Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-23 Thread Glen Slick via cctalk
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:38 AM Chris Elmquist via cctalk
 wrote:
>
> On Wednesday (03/23/2022 at 04:18PM +0100), Christian Corti via cctalk wrote:
> >
> > I didn't even know that primitive EPROMs have device IDs...
> > Without looking for a data book, how is the ID mechanism implemented?
>
> Intel called it "Intelligent Identifier(tm) Mode".
>
>  From page 5-43 of my 1991 Intel Memory Products book, for the 27256,
>
> You put Vh (+12V) on address A9 and then,
>
> with A0=0, you will read out the manufacturer ID
> with A0=1, you will read out the device ID
>
> Chris

It is interesting that the Table 1 Operating Modes referenced above on
page 5-43 says that the Manufacturer ID is 89H for UV erasable Cerdip
parts, and 88H for OTP Plastic parts.

The interesting thing is that previously Intel data books (e.g.
1983_Memory_Component_Handbook.pdf, page 4-28) said "All identifiers
for manufacturer and device codes will possess odd parity, with the
MSB (D7) defined as the parity bit". The Manufacturer ID of 88H does
not have odd parity. I don't know if the odd parity requirement was
removed, or if this is an exception.


Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-23 Thread Chris Elmquist via cctalk
On Wednesday (03/23/2022 at 04:18PM +0100), Christian Corti via cctalk wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, Chris Elmquist wrote:
> > More interesting.  If the programming algorithms remained the same then I
> > guess it is just an issue for the programming system--  when it auto-IDs,
> > it should display (and allow!) 27C256A instead of 27C256.
> > 
> > I guess the next question is whether the programming algorithms really
> > are the same between the 8CH and the 8DH variants??
> > 
> > My limited testing suggests they are at least compatible since my 8DH
> > appears to be working when programmed as an 8CH.
> 
> I didn't even know that primitive EPROMs have device IDs...
> Without looking for a data book, how is the ID mechanism implemented?

Intel called it "Intelligent Identifier(tm) Mode".

 From page 5-43 of my 1991 Intel Memory Products book, for the 27256,

You put Vh (+12V) on address A9 and then,

with A0=0, you will read out the manufacturer ID
with A0=1, you will read out the device ID

Chris
-- 
Chris Elmquist



Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-23 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 3/23/22 08:18, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, Chris Elmquist wrote:
>> More interesting.  If the programming algorithms remained the same then I
>> guess it is just an issue for the programming system--  when it auto-IDs,
>> it should display (and allow!) 27C256A instead of 27C256.
>

I think I first ran into this with the Seeq "Silicon Signature" PROMs.
In my case, I think they were 27128s.

--Chuck



Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-23 Thread Christian Corti via cctalk

On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, Chris Elmquist wrote:

More interesting.  If the programming algorithms remained the same then I
guess it is just an issue for the programming system--  when it auto-IDs,
it should display (and allow!) 27C256A instead of 27C256.

I guess the next question is whether the programming algorithms really
are the same between the 8CH and the 8DH variants??

My limited testing suggests they are at least compatible since my 8DH
appears to be working when programmed as an 8CH.


I didn't even know that primitive EPROMs have device IDs...
Without looking for a data book, how is the ID mechanism implemented?

Christian


Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-23 Thread Chris Elmquist via cctalk
On Tuesday (03/22/2022 at 08:09PM -0700), Glen Slick wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 12:25 PM Chris Elmquist  wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday (03/22/2022 at 12:20PM -0700), Glen Slick wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:56 AM Chris Elmquist  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Trying not to hijack the thread too much but I have an Intel D27C256-200
> > > > here in my TL866II+ programmer and it returns ID  89h / 8Dh.
> > > >
> > >
> > > http://www.bitsavers.org/components/intel/_dataBooks/1993_Intel_Memory_Products.pdf
> > > Page 5-78 (Page 1201 of the PDF)
> > > Table 1. Mode Selection
> > > Intelligent Identifier - Manufacturer 89H
> > > Intelligent Identifier - Device 8DH
> > > That is for the A27C256 "Automotive" rated version.
> > >
> > > My BP Microsystems BP-1610 device programmer software doesn't have an
> > > entry for that one either.
> >
> > Interesting.  Thanks Glen.  The part is clearly labeled as
> > "D27C256-200V10" so they must not have gotten around to changing the D
> > to an A :-)
> 
> (Flogging a dead horse here slightly)
> 
> Just took a look at a previous version of that Intel databook:
> http://www.bitsavers.org/components/intel/_dataBooks/1991_Intel_Memory_Products.pdf
> 
> Page 5-56 (Page 325 of the PDF) 27C256
> Table 1. Mode Selection
> Intelligent Identifier - Manufacturer 89H
> Intelligent Identifier - Device 8DH
> NOTES:
> 4. Programming equipment may also refer to this device as the 27C256A.
> Older devices may have device ID = 8CH
> 
> So apparently the Device ID change is not specific to the A27C256
> "Automotive" rated version, just that in the 1993 version of the
> databook where I first looked the only EPROMs listed are the
> "Automotive" ones.

More interesting.  If the programming algorithms remained the same then I
guess it is just an issue for the programming system--  when it auto-IDs,
it should display (and allow!) 27C256A instead of 27C256.

I guess the next question is whether the programming algorithms really
are the same between the 8CH and the 8DH variants??

My limited testing suggests they are at least compatible since my 8DH
appears to be working when programmed as an 8CH.

Chris
-- 
Chris Elmquist



Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-22 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 3/22/22 21:32, dwight via cctalk wrote:
> Years ago when I was at Intel, they would take EPROMs that had only a few 
> defects and attempt to program them with specific applications. They would 
> then usually paint the window black and put on that particular product 
> number. When we needed EPROMs in the lab, we would take a pile of these that 
> were no longer used and scrape the paint off the window. Some would take the 
> desired program and some wouldn't.
> I suspect that they can fuse identify specific bad EPROMs to use for such 
> harvesting. The fused value may be laser blown as well. My guess is that that 
> is the reason for the different ID number. If it will take pre-programming 
> with a particular data, it is worth harvesting.
> This way they can find value in an otherwise unsellable product. I doubt the 
> harvesting methods have changed much over the years.

That's not surprising.  Probably cheaper even for IBM than
mask-programmed PROMs.

--Chuck



Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-22 Thread dwight via cctalk
Years ago when I was at Intel, they would take EPROMs that had only a few 
defects and attempt to program them with specific applications. They would then 
usually paint the window black and put on that particular product number. When 
we needed EPROMs in the lab, we would take a pile of these that were no longer 
used and scrape the paint off the window. Some would take the desired program 
and some wouldn't.
I suspect that they can fuse identify specific bad EPROMs to use for such 
harvesting. The fused value may be laser blown as well. My guess is that that 
is the reason for the different ID number. If it will take pre-programming with 
a particular data, it is worth harvesting.
This way they can find value in an otherwise unsellable product. I doubt the 
harvesting methods have changed much over the years.
Dwight

From: cctalk  on behalf of Paul Berger via 
cctalk 
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 1:14 PM
To: D. Resor via cctalk 
Subject: Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

I can tell you what some of the chips are on the power supply board, but
the list I have is mostly TTL parts

1582684 LM324
1582606 74LS74  F/F D-TYPE DUAL +E/T
2392122 7417BUF/DVR HEX O/C (TPD0 30NS)
8272147 74LS05  INV HEX O/C

Aside from the house numbering of parts which is not unique to IBM, IBM
had their own foundry for many years so you will encounter custom  parts
for which there is no industry equivalent, this is also not unique to
IBM, I have some HP computers that many of the parts are house numbered,
and HP also manufactured their own chips so there are some parts that
are unobtanium as well.

Paul.

On 2022-03-22 06:40, D. Resor via cctalk wrote:
> There are a few other problems.
>
> The power supply does not power up.  Three of it's four voltages are missing
> (+5vdc, +8.5vdc, +13vdc).  With no connections to the power supply board,
> the +5vdc measures 4.92vdc while the other two voltages are still zero
> volts.
>
> The second issue I found upon removing the driver and processor board is
> moisture had entered the typewriter's electronics and the connector between
> the two boards has corrosion on many of the pins and on the PWB near the
> connector.
>
> I do not have access to a microscope.
>
> I know it has been explained to me elsewhere that UV exposure from
> florescent lamps can erase the proms.  The way I understand is the glass of
> the florescent lamp filters out any UV radiation (as does the piece of glass
> mounted in front of quartz halogen lighting).  In order that a UV lamp can
> operate correctly the tube must be made of quartz, not glass.
>
> Am I wrong here?
>
> Don Resor
>
> From: dwight 
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 4:50 PM
> To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
> ; D. Resor 
> Subject: Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?
>
> The dies look to have consistent wire bonding. That would mean they are one
> of the standard EPROMs made by Intel, just preprogrammed by Intel before
> shipping. The numbers wouldn't be intel numbers they would be IBMs inventory
> numbers. My guess is that they are 2732s. You might use a microscope and
> look at the edges of the dies. They often have the die type in the metal
> layers around the edge some place. Avoid using florescent ring lights as a
> large amount of UVC leaks from these. White LED are or incandescent lights.
> Also power it up and note which pins look to have signals. if any of the
> lines have what looks like a constant voltage measure it to the nearest .01
> volts if you can. That will help determine if it is driven by a signal or a
> hard tied wire. Lower left and upper right should be ground and power pins.
> Dwight
>
>
>_
>
> From: cctalk  on behalf of D. Resor via
> cctalk 
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 6:53 PM
> To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
> 
> Subject: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?
>
> I cannot find a datasheet by any of the numbers silkscreened on these ICs.
>
> Could these be proprietary IBM P/N numbers?
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/f6rvemx9ldbbv5x/EPROMS1.jpg?dl=0
>
> No need for a Dropbox account, close the login pop up and you can view the
> image.
>
> Thanks
>
> Don Resor
>
>


Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-22 Thread Glen Slick via cctalk
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 12:25 PM Chris Elmquist  wrote:
>
> On Tuesday (03/22/2022 at 12:20PM -0700), Glen Slick wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:56 AM Chris Elmquist  wrote:
> > >
> > > Trying not to hijack the thread too much but I have an Intel D27C256-200
> > > here in my TL866II+ programmer and it returns ID  89h / 8Dh.
> > >
> >
> > http://www.bitsavers.org/components/intel/_dataBooks/1993_Intel_Memory_Products.pdf
> > Page 5-78 (Page 1201 of the PDF)
> > Table 1. Mode Selection
> > Intelligent Identifier - Manufacturer 89H
> > Intelligent Identifier - Device 8DH
> > That is for the A27C256 "Automotive" rated version.
> >
> > My BP Microsystems BP-1610 device programmer software doesn't have an
> > entry for that one either.
>
> Interesting.  Thanks Glen.  The part is clearly labeled as
> "D27C256-200V10" so they must not have gotten around to changing the D
> to an A :-)

(Flogging a dead horse here slightly)

Just took a look at a previous version of that Intel databook:
http://www.bitsavers.org/components/intel/_dataBooks/1991_Intel_Memory_Products.pdf

Page 5-56 (Page 325 of the PDF) 27C256
Table 1. Mode Selection
Intelligent Identifier - Manufacturer 89H
Intelligent Identifier - Device 8DH
NOTES:
4. Programming equipment may also refer to this device as the 27C256A.
Older devices may have device ID = 8CH

So apparently the Device ID change is not specific to the A27C256
"Automotive" rated version, just that in the 1993 version of the
databook where I first looked the only EPROMs listed are the
"Automotive" ones.


Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-22 Thread Paul Berger via cctalk
I can tell you what some of the chips are on the power supply board, but 
the list I have is mostly TTL parts


1582684 LM324
1582606 74LS74  F/F D-TYPE DUAL +E/T
2392122 7417    BUF/DVR HEX O/C (TPD0 30NS)
8272147 74LS05  INV HEX O/C

Aside from the house numbering of parts which is not unique to IBM, IBM 
had their own foundry for many years so you will encounter custom  parts 
for which there is no industry equivalent, this is also not unique to 
IBM, I have some HP computers that many of the parts are house numbered, 
and HP also manufactured their own chips so there are some parts that 
are unobtanium as well.


Paul.

On 2022-03-22 06:40, D. Resor via cctalk wrote:

There are a few other problems.
  
The power supply does not power up.  Three of it's four voltages are missing

(+5vdc, +8.5vdc, +13vdc).  With no connections to the power supply board,
the +5vdc measures 4.92vdc while the other two voltages are still zero
volts.
  
The second issue I found upon removing the driver and processor board is

moisture had entered the typewriter's electronics and the connector between
the two boards has corrosion on many of the pins and on the PWB near the
connector.
  
I do not have access to a microscope.
  
I know it has been explained to me elsewhere that UV exposure from

florescent lamps can erase the proms.  The way I understand is the glass of
the florescent lamp filters out any UV radiation (as does the piece of glass
mounted in front of quartz halogen lighting).  In order that a UV lamp can
operate correctly the tube must be made of quartz, not glass.
  
Am I wrong here?
  
Don Resor
  
From: dwight 

Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 4:50 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
; D. Resor 
Subject: Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?
  
The dies look to have consistent wire bonding. That would mean they are one

of the standard EPROMs made by Intel, just preprogrammed by Intel before
shipping. The numbers wouldn't be intel numbers they would be IBMs inventory
numbers. My guess is that they are 2732s. You might use a microscope and
look at the edges of the dies. They often have the die type in the metal
layers around the edge some place. Avoid using florescent ring lights as a
large amount of UVC leaks from these. White LED are or incandescent lights.
Also power it up and note which pins look to have signals. if any of the
lines have what looks like a constant voltage measure it to the nearest .01
volts if you can. That will help determine if it is driven by a signal or a
hard tied wire. Lower left and upper right should be ground and power pins.
Dwight
  
  
   _


From: cctalk  on behalf of D. Resor via
cctalk 
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 6:53 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'

Subject: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?
  
I cannot find a datasheet by any of the numbers silkscreened on these ICs.
  
Could these be proprietary IBM P/N numbers?
  
https://www.dropbox.com/s/f6rvemx9ldbbv5x/EPROMS1.jpg?dl=0
  
No need for a Dropbox account, close the login pop up and you can view the

image.
  
Thanks
  
Don Resor
  
  


Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-22 Thread Chris Elmquist via cctalk
On Tuesday (03/22/2022 at 12:20PM -0700), Glen Slick wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:56 AM Chris Elmquist  wrote:
> >
> > Trying not to hijack the thread too much but I have an Intel D27C256-200
> > here in my TL866II+ programmer and it returns ID  89h / 8Dh.
> >
> 
> http://www.bitsavers.org/components/intel/_dataBooks/1993_Intel_Memory_Products.pdf
> Page 5-78 (Page 1201 of the PDF)
> Table 1. Mode Selection
> Intelligent Identifier - Manufacturer 89H
> Intelligent Identifier - Device 8DH
> That is for the A27C256 "Automotive" rated version.
> 
> My BP Microsystems BP-1610 device programmer software doesn't have an
> entry for that one either.

Interesting.  Thanks Glen.  The part is clearly labeled as
"D27C256-200V10" so they must not have gotten around to changing the D
to an A :-)

But, that explains it.  Thanks for the digging.

Chris
-- 
Chris Elmquist



Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-22 Thread Glen Slick via cctalk
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:56 AM Chris Elmquist  wrote:
>
> Trying not to hijack the thread too much but I have an Intel D27C256-200
> here in my TL866II+ programmer and it returns ID  89h / 8Dh.
>

http://www.bitsavers.org/components/intel/_dataBooks/1993_Intel_Memory_Products.pdf
Page 5-78 (Page 1201 of the PDF)
Table 1. Mode Selection
Intelligent Identifier - Manufacturer 89H
Intelligent Identifier - Device 8DH
That is for the A27C256 "Automotive" rated version.

My BP Microsystems BP-1610 device programmer software doesn't have an
entry for that one either.


Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-22 Thread Chris Elmquist via cctalk
On Monday (03/21/2022 at 09:17PM -0700), Glen Slick via cctalk wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 8:25 PM Chuck Guzis via cctalk
>  wrote:
> >
> > The PROMs are most likely house-labeled Intel commodity parts with
> > JEDEC-standard pinouts, so it should be fairly easy, using an EPROM
> > reader, to figure out if these are 8KB, 16KB, 32KB or 64KB devices.
> 
> Some device programmers can read the manufacturer and device ID codes
> from a device, if they are implemented. That would be another way to
> check for a Intel standard part.

[...]

> 
> Intel 27256 - 89h / 04h
> Intel 27C256 - 89h / 8Ch

[...]

Trying not to hijack the thread too much but I have an Intel D27C256-200
here in my TL866II+ programmer and it returns ID  89h / 8Dh.

The TL866+software actually fails to program it if the "Check Id"
feature is enabled as it complains about ID mismatch.  But if I disable
that, it programs correctly and works in-circuit without issue.

Without disabling the Id check, there would be no way to program an
Intel 27256 on this programmer since there are no other 256K-bit Intel
offerings in the menu-- so I am suspecious of the situation.

Any idea why some Intel 256K-bit PROMs are 89/8C and some are 89/8D??
 
Chris
-- 
Chris Elmquist



Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-22 Thread dwight via cctalk
It is true that the glass blocks most of the UVC from florescent lamps. The key 
word here is "most". It is not a 100% block.
When looking at aged data in EPROMs one should error on the side of caution.
As an example, I have a pole lamp that I use a standard florescent bulb, with 
the typical spiral of 3 turns. I used it for about 4 hours a day for about a 
month when I bumped into the lamp shade.
It crumbled into pieces. At the base where the lamp shade was protected from 
direct light of the lamp, the plastic seemed to be of full strength, even 
though the temperature was higher at the base.
I don't know the intensity of the various levels of UV at different frequencies 
leaking from the lamp. I do know that it takes a specific high frequency of UV 
in the UVC range as a minimum to erase EPROMs. This plastic may be sensitive to 
UV closer to the visible spectrum.
I'm only saying that one should use a lamp that has zero UVC as apposed to a 
lamp that has a filter reduced level of UVC.
Years ago, I won a bet by allowing an EPROM to sit exposed for 3 months in an 
industrial setting, using florescent tube lighting. It did not erase any of the 
data in that condition. I suspect it had some effect but unlikely much more 
than that lost by cosmic rays over the same period of time.
Holding an aged EPROM about 2 inches from a florescent lamp is still not 
something that I'd bet on.
Dwight




From: D. Resor 
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 2:40 AM
To: 'dwight' ; 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic 
Posts' 
Subject: RE: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?


There are a few other problems.



The power supply does not power up.  Three of it’s four voltages are missing 
(+5vdc, +8.5vdc, +13vdc).  With no connections to the power supply board, the 
+5vdc measures 4.92vdc while the other two voltages are still zero volts.



The second issue I found upon removing the driver and processor board is 
moisture had entered the typewriter’s electronics and the connector between the 
two boards has corrosion on many of the pins and on the PWB near the connector.



I do not have access to a microscope.



I know it has been explained to me elsewhere that UV exposure from florescent 
lamps can erase the proms.  The way I understand is the glass of the florescent 
lamp filters out any UV radiation (as does the piece of glass mounted in front 
of quartz halogen lighting).  In order that a UV lamp can operate correctly the 
tube must be made of quartz, not glass.



Am I wrong here?



Don Resor



From: dwight 
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 4:50 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' ; 
D. Resor 
Subject: Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?



The dies look to have consistent wire bonding. That would mean they are one of 
the standard EPROMs made by Intel, just preprogrammed by Intel before shipping. 
The numbers wouldn't be intel numbers they would be IBMs inventory numbers. My 
guess is that they are 2732s. You might use a microscope and look at the edges 
of the dies. They often have the die type in the metal layers around the edge 
some place. Avoid using florescent ring lights as a large amount of UVC leaks 
from these. White LED are or incandescent lights.

Also power it up and note which pins look to have signals. if any of the lines 
have what looks like a constant voltage measure it to the nearest .01 volts if 
you can. That will help determine if it is driven by a signal or a hard tied 
wire. Lower left and upper right should be ground and power pins.

Dwight







From: cctalk  on behalf of D. Resor via cctalk 

Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 6:53 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' 
Subject: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?



I cannot find a datasheet by any of the numbers silkscreened on these ICs.

Could these be proprietary IBM P/N numbers?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/f6rvemx9ldbbv5x/EPROMS1.jpg?dl=0

No need for a Dropbox account, close the login pop up and you can view the
image.

Thanks

Don Resor




Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-22 Thread Paul Berger via cctalk
You are correct ordinary glass does not transmit UV well, the UV lamps 
normally used to erase EPROMs and germicidal lamps like the window in an 
EPROM are made from quartz glass. Florescent lights do leak a little UV 
but it would take a long time to erase an EPROM.


Paul.

On 2022-03-22 06:40, D. Resor via cctalk wrote:

There are a few other problems.
  
The power supply does not power up.  Three of it's four voltages are missing

(+5vdc, +8.5vdc, +13vdc).  With no connections to the power supply board,
the +5vdc measures 4.92vdc while the other two voltages are still zero
volts.
  
The second issue I found upon removing the driver and processor board is

moisture had entered the typewriter's electronics and the connector between
the two boards has corrosion on many of the pins and on the PWB near the
connector.
  
I do not have access to a microscope.
  
I know it has been explained to me elsewhere that UV exposure from

florescent lamps can erase the proms.  The way I understand is the glass of
the florescent lamp filters out any UV radiation (as does the piece of glass
mounted in front of quartz halogen lighting).  In order that a UV lamp can
operate correctly the tube must be made of quartz, not glass.
  
Am I wrong here?
  
Don Resor
  
From: dwight 

Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 4:50 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
; D. Resor 
Subject: Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?
  
The dies look to have consistent wire bonding. That would mean they are one

of the standard EPROMs made by Intel, just preprogrammed by Intel before
shipping. The numbers wouldn't be intel numbers they would be IBMs inventory
numbers. My guess is that they are 2732s. You might use a microscope and
look at the edges of the dies. They often have the die type in the metal
layers around the edge some place. Avoid using florescent ring lights as a
large amount of UVC leaks from these. White LED are or incandescent lights.
Also power it up and note which pins look to have signals. if any of the
lines have what looks like a constant voltage measure it to the nearest .01
volts if you can. That will help determine if it is driven by a signal or a
hard tied wire. Lower left and upper right should be ground and power pins.
Dwight
  
  
   _


From: cctalk  on behalf of D. Resor via
cctalk 
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 6:53 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'

Subject: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?
  
I cannot find a datasheet by any of the numbers silkscreened on these ICs.
  
Could these be proprietary IBM P/N numbers?
  
https://www.dropbox.com/s/f6rvemx9ldbbv5x/EPROMS1.jpg?dl=0
  
No need for a Dropbox account, close the login pop up and you can view the

image.
  
Thanks
  
Don Resor
  
  


RE: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-22 Thread D. Resor via cctalk
There are a few other problems.
 
The power supply does not power up.  Three of it's four voltages are missing
(+5vdc, +8.5vdc, +13vdc).  With no connections to the power supply board,
the +5vdc measures 4.92vdc while the other two voltages are still zero
volts.
 
The second issue I found upon removing the driver and processor board is
moisture had entered the typewriter's electronics and the connector between
the two boards has corrosion on many of the pins and on the PWB near the
connector.
 
I do not have access to a microscope.
 
I know it has been explained to me elsewhere that UV exposure from
florescent lamps can erase the proms.  The way I understand is the glass of
the florescent lamp filters out any UV radiation (as does the piece of glass
mounted in front of quartz halogen lighting).  In order that a UV lamp can
operate correctly the tube must be made of quartz, not glass.
 
Am I wrong here?  
 
Don Resor
 
From: dwight  
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 4:50 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
; D. Resor 
Subject: Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?
 
The dies look to have consistent wire bonding. That would mean they are one
of the standard EPROMs made by Intel, just preprogrammed by Intel before
shipping. The numbers wouldn't be intel numbers they would be IBMs inventory
numbers. My guess is that they are 2732s. You might use a microscope and
look at the edges of the dies. They often have the die type in the metal
layers around the edge some place. Avoid using florescent ring lights as a
large amount of UVC leaks from these. White LED are or incandescent lights.
Also power it up and note which pins look to have signals. if any of the
lines have what looks like a constant voltage measure it to the nearest .01
volts if you can. That will help determine if it is driven by a signal or a
hard tied wire. Lower left and upper right should be ground and power pins.
Dwight
 
 
  _  

From: cctalk  on behalf of D. Resor via
cctalk 
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 6:53 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'

Subject: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board? 
 
I cannot find a datasheet by any of the numbers silkscreened on these ICs.
 
Could these be proprietary IBM P/N numbers?
 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/f6rvemx9ldbbv5x/EPROMS1.jpg?dl=0
 
No need for a Dropbox account, close the login pop up and you can view the
image.
 
Thanks
 
Don Resor
 
 


Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-22 Thread Paul Berger via cctalk
The only new information I can gather from those picture is it would 
appear that pins 1 and 28  of the EPROMs is tied together and since 28 
is Vcc, connected to +5V this would eliminate 27512 as pin 1 on a 27512 
is A15, but on 2764, 27128, and 27256 it is Vpp and would normally be 
tied to +5V for read.  As I mentioned previously the empty position has 
pin 26, 27, and 28 tied together, if the positions that are populated 
with sockets are the same that would eliminate 27128 and 27256 as well, 
and I would stand by my previous suggestion that it is 2764.  I would 
suggest that you check to see if 26 and 27 are connected to pin 28 on 
those sockets to verify.


Paul.

On 2022-03-22 07:03, D. Resor via cctalk wrote:

I've taken and uploaded some larger easy to view images of the processor board 
component and solder sides.

One plus is the eproms are socketed.

I've uploaded an image showing the silk screening stamp on the underside of the 
eproms.

Now that I look closer at the Power Supply PWB I see it too is filled with 
proprietarily marked parts (sigh).

Big Blue's curse continues.

Interestingly Xerox didn’t do this with the Star 6085 Workstation.  The full 
service manuals are available for download.  I believe the 8010 is the same way.

I suppose I can email my contact at IBM archives and inquire about circuit 
diagrams...  It never hurts to ask.

I have the MiniPro TL866II Plus programmer.  It does have the ability to read 
the ID of ICs. Setup requires you first select IC p/n number from the list, and 
then it verifies the data prior to a read or write.

It would be nice if it could ID the IC automatically.   I realize there are 
probably too many variables to do this safely without risk of destroying the 
EPROM and/or the data written on it.


https://www.dropbox.com/s/juvn0ahnwp51k80/ProcessorPWBCompSide1.jpg?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/s4mqpxd9ksnciil/ProcessorPWBSolderSide1.jpg?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/rl26dkv3jjuip0u/PromUnderside1.jpg?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/mqok0avoqqumyuq/PowerSpplyPWB1.jpg?dl=0

Don Resor

-Original Message-
From: cctalk  On Behalf Of Glen Slick via cctalk
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 9:17 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts 
Subject: Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 8:25 PM Chuck Guzis via cctalk  
wrote:

The PROMs are most likely house-labeled Intel commodity parts with
JEDEC-standard pinouts, so it should be fairly easy, using an EPROM
reader, to figure out if these are 8KB, 16KB, 32KB or 64KB devices.

Some device programmers can read the manufacturer and device ID codes from a 
device, if they are implemented. That would be another way to check for a Intel 
standard part.

Intel 2764 - 89h / 02h
Intel 2764A - 89h / 08h
Intel 27C64 - 89h / 07h

Intel 27128 - 89h / 83h
Intel 27128A - 89h / 89h
Intel 27C128 - 89h / FCh

Intel 27256 - 89h / 04h
Intel 27C256 - 89h / 8Ch

Intel 27512 - 89h / 0Dh
Intel 27C512 - 89h / FDh



RE: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-22 Thread D. Resor via cctalk
I've taken and uploaded some larger easy to view images of the processor board 
component and solder sides.

One plus is the eproms are socketed.  

I've uploaded an image showing the silk screening stamp on the underside of the 
eproms.

Now that I look closer at the Power Supply PWB I see it too is filled with 
proprietarily marked parts (sigh).

Big Blue's curse continues.

Interestingly Xerox didn’t do this with the Star 6085 Workstation.  The full 
service manuals are available for download.  I believe the 8010 is the same way.

I suppose I can email my contact at IBM archives and inquire about circuit 
diagrams...  It never hurts to ask.

I have the MiniPro TL866II Plus programmer.  It does have the ability to read 
the ID of ICs. Setup requires you first select IC p/n number from the list, and 
then it verifies the data prior to a read or write.

It would be nice if it could ID the IC automatically.   I realize there are 
probably too many variables to do this safely without risk of destroying the 
EPROM and/or the data written on it.


https://www.dropbox.com/s/juvn0ahnwp51k80/ProcessorPWBCompSide1.jpg?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/s4mqpxd9ksnciil/ProcessorPWBSolderSide1.jpg?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/rl26dkv3jjuip0u/PromUnderside1.jpg?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/mqok0avoqqumyuq/PowerSpplyPWB1.jpg?dl=0

Don Resor

-Original Message-
From: cctalk  On Behalf Of Glen Slick via cctalk
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 9:17 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts 
Subject: Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 8:25 PM Chuck Guzis via cctalk  
wrote:
>
> The PROMs are most likely house-labeled Intel commodity parts with 
> JEDEC-standard pinouts, so it should be fairly easy, using an EPROM 
> reader, to figure out if these are 8KB, 16KB, 32KB or 64KB devices.

Some device programmers can read the manufacturer and device ID codes from a 
device, if they are implemented. That would be another way to check for a Intel 
standard part.

Intel 2764 - 89h / 02h
Intel 2764A - 89h / 08h
Intel 27C64 - 89h / 07h

Intel 27128 - 89h / 83h
Intel 27128A - 89h / 89h
Intel 27C128 - 89h / FCh

Intel 27256 - 89h / 04h
Intel 27C256 - 89h / 8Ch

Intel 27512 - 89h / 0Dh
Intel 27C512 - 89h / FDh



Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-21 Thread Glen Slick via cctalk
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 8:25 PM Chuck Guzis via cctalk
 wrote:
>
> The PROMs are most likely house-labeled Intel commodity parts with
> JEDEC-standard pinouts, so it should be fairly easy, using an EPROM
> reader, to figure out if these are 8KB, 16KB, 32KB or 64KB devices.

Some device programmers can read the manufacturer and device ID codes
from a device, if they are implemented. That would be another way to
check for a Intel standard part.

Intel 2764 - 89h / 02h
Intel 2764A - 89h / 08h
Intel 27C64 - 89h / 07h

Intel 27128 - 89h / 83h
Intel 27128A - 89h / 89h
Intel 27C128 - 89h / FCh

Intel 27256 - 89h / 04h
Intel 27C256 - 89h / 8Ch

Intel 27512 - 89h / 0Dh
Intel 27C512 - 89h / FDh


Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-21 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
The PROMs are most likely house-labeled Intel commodity parts with
JEDEC-standard pinouts, so it should be fairly easy, using an EPROM
reader, to figure out if these are 8KB, 16KB, 32KB or 64KB devices.

I suppose one could find representative known Intel samples and compare
the appearance "under the window", but I've never done that.

--Chuck


Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-21 Thread dwight via cctalk
Yes, you are correct. I'm a bad counter. I knew a 2732 was a 24 but suffer from 
brain rot. Still it is likely a standard Intel part. At most it may have a pin 
swap on something like a select pin.
Measuring the pins, will tell which pins are tied and which are active.
Dwight


From: cctalk  on behalf of Paul Berger via 
cctalk 
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 5:19 PM
To: dwight via cctalk 
Subject: Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

They won't be 2732 as the EPROM in the picture has 28 pins, but 2732 is
a 24 pin package 2764, 27128, 27256 and 27512 are all in 28 pin packages.

The 8519602 does look like an IBM house number but unfortunately it is
not listed in the cross reference I have .

I would agree it should be fairly easy to figure out what they are by
looking at the circuitry surrounding them.  The unpopulated U3 position
beside the EPROM looks like it might be for another EPROM and it looks
to have pins 26,27,and 28 all tied together on everything larger than a
2764, pin 26 is A13 so my guess would be 2764.  If you read a 2764 as a
27128 the upper and lower halves of the image will be identical because
the A13 pin is not connected on a 2764 so you would effectively read the
EPROM twice.  Pin 26 tied high would eliminate anything larger than a 2764.

Paul.


On 2022-03-21 20:49, dwight via cctalk wrote:
> The dies look to have consistent wire bonding. That would mean they are one 
> of the standard EPROMs made by Intel, just preprogrammed by Intel before 
> shipping. The numbers wouldn't be intel numbers they would be IBMs inventory 
> numbers. My guess is that they are 2732s. You might use a microscope and look 
> at the edges of the dies. They often have the die type in the metal layers 
> around the edge some place. Avoid using florescent ring lights as a large 
> amount of UVC leaks from these. White LED are or incandescent lights.
> Also power it up and note which pins look to have signals. if any of the 
> lines have what looks like a constant voltage measure it to the nearest .01 
> volts if you can. That will help determine if it is driven by a signal or a 
> hard tied wire. Lower left and upper right should be ground and power pins.
> Dwight
>
>
> 
> From: cctalk  on behalf of D. Resor via cctalk 
> 
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 6:53 PM
> To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' 
> Subject: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?
>
> I cannot find a datasheet by any of the numbers silkscreened on these ICs.
>
> Could these be proprietary IBM P/N numbers?
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/f6rvemx9ldbbv5x/EPROMS1.jpg?dl=0
>
> No need for a Dropbox account, close the login pop up and you can view the
> image.
>
> Thanks
>
> Don Resor
>
>


Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-21 Thread Paul Berger via cctalk
They won't be 2732 as the EPROM in the picture has 28 pins, but 2732 is 
a 24 pin package 2764, 27128, 27256 and 27512 are all in 28 pin packages.


The 8519602 does look like an IBM house number but unfortunately it is 
not listed in the cross reference I have .


I would agree it should be fairly easy to figure out what they are by 
looking at the circuitry surrounding them.  The unpopulated U3 position 
beside the EPROM looks like it might be for another EPROM and it looks 
to have pins 26,27,and 28 all tied together on everything larger than a 
2764, pin 26 is A13 so my guess would be 2764.  If you read a 2764 as a 
27128 the upper and lower halves of the image will be identical because 
the A13 pin is not connected on a 2764 so you would effectively read the 
EPROM twice.  Pin 26 tied high would eliminate anything larger than a 2764.


Paul.


On 2022-03-21 20:49, dwight via cctalk wrote:

The dies look to have consistent wire bonding. That would mean they are one of 
the standard EPROMs made by Intel, just preprogrammed by Intel before shipping. 
The numbers wouldn't be intel numbers they would be IBMs inventory numbers. My 
guess is that they are 2732s. You might use a microscope and look at the edges 
of the dies. They often have the die type in the metal layers around the edge 
some place. Avoid using florescent ring lights as a large amount of UVC leaks 
from these. White LED are or incandescent lights.
Also power it up and note which pins look to have signals. if any of the lines 
have what looks like a constant voltage measure it to the nearest .01 volts if 
you can. That will help determine if it is driven by a signal or a hard tied 
wire. Lower left and upper right should be ground and power pins.
Dwight



From: cctalk  on behalf of D. Resor via cctalk 

Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 6:53 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' 
Subject: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

I cannot find a datasheet by any of the numbers silkscreened on these ICs.

Could these be proprietary IBM P/N numbers?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/f6rvemx9ldbbv5x/EPROMS1.jpg?dl=0

No need for a Dropbox account, close the login pop up and you can view the
image.

Thanks

Don Resor




Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-21 Thread dwight via cctalk
The dies look to have consistent wire bonding. That would mean they are one of 
the standard EPROMs made by Intel, just preprogrammed by Intel before shipping. 
The numbers wouldn't be intel numbers they would be IBMs inventory numbers. My 
guess is that they are 2732s. You might use a microscope and look at the edges 
of the dies. They often have the die type in the metal layers around the edge 
some place. Avoid using florescent ring lights as a large amount of UVC leaks 
from these. White LED are or incandescent lights.
Also power it up and note which pins look to have signals. if any of the lines 
have what looks like a constant voltage measure it to the nearest .01 volts if 
you can. That will help determine if it is driven by a signal or a hard tied 
wire. Lower left and upper right should be ground and power pins.
Dwight



From: cctalk  on behalf of D. Resor via cctalk 

Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 6:53 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' 
Subject: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

I cannot find a datasheet by any of the numbers silkscreened on these ICs.

Could these be proprietary IBM P/N numbers?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/f6rvemx9ldbbv5x/EPROMS1.jpg?dl=0

No need for a Dropbox account, close the login pop up and you can view the
image.

Thanks

Don Resor




ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-21 Thread D. Resor via cctalk
I cannot find a datasheet by any of the numbers silkscreened on these ICs.
 
Could these be proprietary IBM P/N numbers?
 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/f6rvemx9ldbbv5x/EPROMS1.jpg?dl=0
 
No need for a Dropbox account, close the login pop up and you can view the
image.
 
Thanks
 
Don Resor
 
 


RE: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-20 Thread D. Resor via cctalk
This is the CPU board out of a first generation 1982-83 IBM Electronic 85 
Typewriter (Electronics Driven Selectric). 

I was looking to archive the software/firmware from these.  The machine was 
exposed to some dampness.  Corrosion has ensued on the interface connector 
between the CPU and driver boards.  

The next year, more energy efficient memory ICs were used.  Memory power 
failure back up only consisted of 3 AA batteries and could last up to one year. 
 The predecessor (this board) required 6 AA size Nicads and would only retain 
memory for a few hours.

IBM using their apparently very large stock of OLD aluminum covered ICs in as 
many products possible I guess.

Don Resor

-Original Message-
From: wrco...@wrcooke.net  
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 7:13 PM
To: D. Resor 
Subject: Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?



> On 03/20/2022 8:59 PM D. Resor via cctalk  wrote:
> 
> 
> I cannot find a datasheet by any of the numbers silkscreened on these ICs.
> 
> Could these be proprietary IBM P/N numbers?
> 
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/f6rvemx9ldbbv5x/EPROMS1.jpg?dl=0
> 
> No need for a Dropbox account, close the login pop up and you can view 
> the image.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Don Resor

More details would help.  What is the board?  Do you know at what address in 
the PC memory map they fit?
Based on the info you gave and the picture  I would bet $1 they are standard 
2764 chips.  The 2764 was the first standard chip to have 28 pins.  The size of 
the die visible through the quartz window is consistent with 2764 (as opposed 
to 27128 or 27256) and the fact there is room for 3 which would give 24K total. 
 The PC didn't have a lot of places in the memory map that would allow more 
than 24K.  Three 27128s would be 48K (a LOT in those days) and the 27256 would 
be 96K.

I can't help with the part numbers.  But I doubt they are IBM proprietary.  The 
vast majority of chips used in the early PC line were standard from other 
companies.
Will



Re: ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-20 Thread Jon Elson via cctalk

On 3/20/22 20:59, D. Resor via cctalk wrote:

I cannot find a datasheet by any of the numbers silkscreened on these ICs.

Could these be proprietary IBM P/N numbers?
Yes, they are.  But, very likely standard 27xx series of 
EPROMS, all you need to know are how many address bits there 
are and you should be able to cross-refence them to standard 
Intel EPROMs.


https://www.dropbox.com/s/f6rvemx9ldbbv5x/EPROMS1.jpg?dl=0


Jon


ID UV erasable PROMS used on an IBM PC board?

2022-03-20 Thread D. Resor via cctalk


I cannot find a datasheet by any of the numbers silkscreened on these ICs.

Could these be proprietary IBM P/N numbers?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/f6rvemx9ldbbv5x/EPROMS1.jpg?dl=0 

No need for a Dropbox account, close the login pop up and you can view the
image.

Thanks

Don Resor