Re: WTB: 64K cache SIMM (72-pin)

2018-09-11 Thread Al Kossow via cctalk



On 9/1/18 9:41 AM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote:

> Is this actually a *non*-standard thing?

it seems likely.

I looked at the IDT and Micron 90's SRAM catalogs
and the x32 stock sram modules they made are all 64 pin





Re: WTB: 64K cache SIMM (72-pin)

2018-09-11 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki via cctalk
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote:

> An excellent question, but it is exactly the same socket as the 72-pin RAM
> SIMMs below it. I even labouriously counted all the pins on the board socket
> this morning just in case I'd missed something, and it's 72. The service
> manual even warns against installing RAM there.
> 
> Is this actually a *non*-standard thing? I know Apple had all kinds of boffo
> L2 cache configurations for the beige Power Macs but Apple's Apple and
> certainly larger than Alpha Micro.

 I'd expect SRAM rather than DRAM on a cache SIMM.  Cache memory is 
supposed to be fast after all.  Otherwise why bother? -- caching only 
complicates things, so there has to be benefit in return.

  Maciej


Re: WTB: 64K cache SIMM (72-pin)

2018-09-01 Thread David Griffith via cctalk
On September 1, 2018 9:41:37 AM PDT, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk 
 wrote:
>> > Trying to restore an Alpha Micro ColdFire-based system, and it's
>missing
>> > its cache SIMM. It works without it, but it sure would be nice. AM
>doesn't
>> > have much info on it but it appears to be a 72-pin 64KB SIMM
>(unknown
>> > speed), same keying as 72-pin RAM SIMMs.
>> >
>> > I doubt this is a custom part and ISTR that PCs of around that time
>used
>> > something similar. If you've got something like this mouldering in
>your
>> > parts drawer, please advise. Thanks!
>> >
>> I have three devices which if I remember right were cache modules,
>but 
>> they all appear to be 80 pin devices.
>> Slightly longer pins than the typical 72-pin SIMMs, fit into a
>vertical 
>> socket on the MB. Any chance you've got the pin count wrong?
>
>An excellent question, but it is exactly the same socket as the 72-pin
>RAM
>SIMMs below it. I even labouriously counted all the pins on the board
>socket
>this morning just in case I'd missed something, and it's 72. The
>service
>manual even warns against installing RAM there.
>
>Is this actually a *non*-standard thing? I know Apple had all kinds of
>boffo
>L2 cache configurations for the beige Power Macs but Apple's Apple and
>certainly larger than Alpha Micro.
>
>-- 
> personal:
>http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
>Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com *
>ckai...@floodgap.com
>-- Seen on hand dryer: "Push button for a message from your
>congressman." -

I had a regular Pentium motherboard with cache like that.  The manual describes 
this as COAST for Cache On A Stick.  The actual  SIMM has gold fingers that are 
much longer than the ones found on regular DRAM SIMMs.  I curiously tried 
putting a regular SIMM into a COAST slot and vice versa.  It didn't work 
because of this length difference.
-- 
David Griffith
d...@661.org


Re: WTB: 64K cache SIMM (72-pin)

2018-09-01 Thread Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
> > Trying to restore an Alpha Micro ColdFire-based system, and it's missing
> > its cache SIMM. It works without it, but it sure would be nice. AM doesn't
> > have much info on it but it appears to be a 72-pin 64KB SIMM (unknown
> > speed), same keying as 72-pin RAM SIMMs.
> >
> > I doubt this is a custom part and ISTR that PCs of around that time used
> > something similar. If you've got something like this mouldering in your
> > parts drawer, please advise. Thanks!
> >
> I have three devices which if I remember right were cache modules, but 
> they all appear to be 80 pin devices.
> Slightly longer pins than the typical 72-pin SIMMs, fit into a vertical 
> socket on the MB. Any chance you've got the pin count wrong?

An excellent question, but it is exactly the same socket as the 72-pin RAM
SIMMs below it. I even labouriously counted all the pins on the board socket
this morning just in case I'd missed something, and it's 72. The service
manual even warns against installing RAM there.

Is this actually a *non*-standard thing? I know Apple had all kinds of boffo
L2 cache configurations for the beige Power Macs but Apple's Apple and
certainly larger than Alpha Micro.

-- 
 personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
  Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com
-- Seen on hand dryer: "Push button for a message from your congressman." -


Re: WTB: 64K cache SIMM (72-pin)

2018-08-31 Thread Rick Murphy via cctalk

On 8/31/2018 8:35 PM, Cameron Kaiser via cctalk wrote:

Trying to restore an Alpha Micro ColdFire-based system, and it's missing
its cache SIMM. It works without it, but it sure would be nice. AM doesn't
have much info on it but it appears to be a 72-pin 64KB SIMM (unknown
speed), same keying as 72-pin RAM SIMMs.

I doubt this is a custom part and ISTR that PCs of around that time used
something similar. If you've got something like this mouldering in your
parts drawer, please advise. Thanks!

I have three devices which if I remember right were cache modules, but 
they all appear to be 80 pin devices.
Slightly longer pins than the typical 72-pin SIMMs, fit into a vertical 
socket on the MB.  Any chance you've got the pin count wrong?

    -Rick




WTB: 64K cache SIMM (72-pin)

2018-08-31 Thread Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
Trying to restore an Alpha Micro ColdFire-based system, and it's missing
its cache SIMM. It works without it, but it sure would be nice. AM doesn't
have much info on it but it appears to be a 72-pin 64KB SIMM (unknown
speed), same keying as 72-pin RAM SIMMs.

I doubt this is a custom part and ISTR that PCs of around that time used
something similar. If you've got something like this mouldering in your
parts drawer, please advise. Thanks!

-- 
 personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
  Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com
-- Heisenberg may have been here. -