Re: [CentOS-es] Traduciendo págia es/TipsAndT ricks/BondingInterfaces

2007-07-23 Thread Jordi Espasa Clofent

Alain,

POr lo que respecta al punto 2 que mencionábamos al principio del hilo, 
a mi me parece una traducción correcta a todas luces.
Ahora mismo ando muy corto de tiempo; si dispongo de algo más de tiempo 
más adelante le doy una ojeada a todo el documento y te comento mi opinión.


Estás haciendo un grandísimo trabajo. Gracias.

--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Traduciendo págia es/TipsAndTricks/BondingInterfaces

2007-07-23 Thread Alain Reguera Delgado

On 7/23/07, Jordi Espasa Clofent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Alain,

POr lo que respecta al punto 2 que mencionábamos al principio del hilo,
a mi me parece una traducción correcta a todas luces.


que bueno escuchar eso :)


Ahora mismo ando muy corto de tiempo; si dispongo de algo más de tiempo
más adelante le doy una ojeada a todo el documento y te comento mi opinión.


eso sería muy útil !!! ...

Si el tiempo les permite, hay otros trabajos preliminares que pueden
ser revisados en http://centos-docses.on-wiki.net/PorHacer.


Estás haciendo un grandísimo trabajo. Gracias.


Muchas gracias Jordi, ... tus mensajes me animan a continuar.

Saludos Cordiales.
al.
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


[CentOS] Re: NFS filesystem recommendations please (and problems with XFS)

2007-07-23 Thread Kay Diederichs

Johnny Hughes wrote:

Patrick - South Valley Internet wrote:

I see it just fine.  Do I need to install the kernel from the plus repos
as well?

Patrick



Akemi Yagi wrote:

I do that, then when I reboot I still get the:

mount: fs type xfs not supported by kernel

Any ideas what's going on?

Patrick


P.S.
The command I was using to install was:

yum --enablerepo=centosplus install kernel-module-xfs

Do I need to issue any other commands as well?

The command looks ok.  Did you see it installed?  Do a :

rpm -qa | grep kernel

to confirm you have it.



You just need to pick the kmod-xfs (or kernel-module-xfs) module for
your running kernel.

uname -a will tell you the kernel, install the kernel module that
matches that one exactly.

You do not need the plus kernel for XFS.


I wanted to try XFS with the normal kernel but I get:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ESRF]# uname -a
Linux turn29.biologie.uni-konstanz.de 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5 #1 SMP Tue Jul 10 
06:39:17 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ESRF]# yum  --enablerepo=centosplus install kmod-xfs.x86_64
Loading protectbase plugin
Loading installonlyn plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
59 packages excluded due to repository protections
Parsing package install arguments
Resolving Dependencies
-- Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
--- Package kmod-xfs.x86_64 0:0.4-1.2.6.18_8.1.8.el5.centos.plus set to be 
installed

-- Running transaction check
-- Processing Dependency: kernel-x86_64 = 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5.centos.plus for 
package: kmod-xfs

-- Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: kernel-x86_64 = 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5.centos.plus is 
needed by package kmod-xfs



So it appears like it _does_ need the plus kernel. Or am I doing anything wrong 
here?


Thx,

Kay

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: NFS filesystem recommendations please (and problems with XFS)

2007-07-23 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Kay Diederichs wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ESRF]# uname -a
 Linux turn29.biologie.uni-konstanz.de 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5 #1 SMP Tue Jul 10 
 06:39:17 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

 -- Processing Dependency: kernel-x86_64 = 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5.centos.plus for 
 package: kmod-xfs
 -- Finished Dependency Resolution
 Error: Missing Dependency: kernel-x86_64 = 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5.centos.plus is 
 needed by package kmod-xfs

 So it appears like it _does_ need the plus kernel. Or am I doing anything 
 wrong here?

Try 

yum install kmod-xfs-0.4-1.2.6.18_8.1.8.el5.x86_64.rpm

instead (with centosplus enabled). 

.el5.centos.plus probably looks newer to the dependency resolver in yum.

Cheers,

Ralph


pgpdidI1pk4Ft.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Re: NFS filesystem recommendations please (and problems with XFS)

2007-07-23 Thread Kay Diederichs

Ralph Angenendt wrote:

Kay Diederichs wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ESRF]# uname -a
Linux turn29.biologie.uni-konstanz.de 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5 #1 SMP Tue Jul 10 
06:39:17 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux


-- Processing Dependency: kernel-x86_64 = 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5.centos.plus for 
package: kmod-xfs

-- Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: kernel-x86_64 = 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5.centos.plus is 
needed by package kmod-xfs


So it appears like it _does_ need the plus kernel. Or am I doing anything 
wrong here?


Try 


yum install kmod-xfs-0.4-1.2.6.18_8.1.8.el5.x86_64.rpm

instead (with centosplus enabled). 


.el5.centos.plus probably looks newer to the dependency resolver in yum.

Cheers,

Ralph


Thanks, Ralph -

yum  --enablerepo=centosplus install kmod-xfs-0.4-1.2.6.18_8.1.8.el5

worked (with .x86_64.rpm appended, it didn't).

I also did yum  --enablerepo=centosplus install xfsprogs
and
/sbin/mkfs.xfs /dev/md4
which is a RAID0, and am now happily testing XFS.

thanks to the CentOS developers for making it so easy to try things out!

Kay

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] is there kiosk mode for firefox?

2007-07-23 Thread Tomas Ruprich
I don't know IE kiosk mode, byt try r-kiosk 
(https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1659).

Opera has quite nice kiosk mode too ;-)

Tom

Sun, Jul 22, 2007 ve 09:24:48PM +0800, Fung napsal:
 Is there kiosk mode for firefox in linux, like the IE kiosk mode in windows?

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 29, Issue 11

2007-07-23 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2007:0569 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 tomcat -  security
  update (Johnny Hughes)
   2. CESA-2007:0569 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 tomcat -security
  update (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 10:57:46 -0500
From: Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0569 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64
tomcat -security update
To: CentOS-Announce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0569

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0569.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

x86_64:
tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.x86_64.rpm
tomcat5-admin-webapps-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.x86_64.rpm
tomcat5-common-lib-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.x86_64.rpm
tomcat5-jasper-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.x86_64.rpm
tomcat5-jasper-javadoc-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.x86_64.rpm
tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.x86_64.rpm
tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-javadoc-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.x86_64.rpm
tomcat5-server-lib-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.x86_64.rpm
tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.x86_64.rpm
tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-javadoc-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.x86_64.rpm
tomcat5-webapps-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.x86_64.rpm

src:
tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.src.rpm

-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20070722/3ed616f2/signature-0001.bin

--

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 10:57:51 -0500
From: Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0569 Moderate CentOS 5 i386
tomcat -security update
To: CentOS-Announce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0569

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0569.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

i386:
tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.i386.rpm
tomcat5-admin-webapps-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.i386.rpm
tomcat5-common-lib-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.i386.rpm
tomcat5-jasper-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.i386.rpm
tomcat5-jasper-javadoc-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.i386.rpm
tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.i386.rpm
tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-javadoc-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.i386.rpm
tomcat5-server-lib-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.i386.rpm
tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.i386.rpm
tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api-javadoc-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.i386.rpm
tomcat5-webapps-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.i386.rpm

src:
tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.src.rpm




-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20070722/6cb3859b/signature-0001.bin

--

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 29, Issue 11
***
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] postfix-2.2.10-1.1.el4.centos.mysql_pgsql.base.i386.rpm vs postfix-2.2.10-1.1.el4.centos.mysql_pgsql.plus.i386.rpm

2007-07-23 Thread David Hrbáč
Hi,
what are the differences between
postfix-2.2.10-1.1.el4.centos.mysql_pgsql.base.i386.rpm vs
postfix-2.2.10-1.1.el4.centos.mysql_pgsql.plus.i386.rpm. Changelogs are
the very same and there's no announcement.
Thanks,
David Hrbáč
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Active Directory

2007-07-23 Thread Adriatik Allamani
Hello

For the moment I manage the user in the network with win 2000 Server.
I want to use an linux OS to manaxhe the network? Is this possible.

So. How can I organize and configure the Cent OS to use it as Active
Directory or something like this, and to open all the existing users
there, and then to shut down the win2000 Server and to Activate the
CentOS as domain controller?

Can someone help me in this?


Thanks


Regards
Adriatik ALLAMANI
PO. Box:  253/1
Tirana / Albania
Telephone: 00 355 4 257 368
Fax: 00 355 4 250 926
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS based router dropping connections

2007-07-23 Thread Jesse Cantara
The problem ended up being the tg3 Broadcom NIC kernel module driver. 
It doesn't work properly at Gigabit speeds. Turning it down to 100 
Megabit fixed the issue. Does anybody know where I should report this bug?


Thanks for all your help,
-Jesse

William L. Maltby wrote:

On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 12:29 -0400, Jesse Cantara wrote:

Hi Bob,

snip


The issue I'm having is that external traffic is being forwarded 
properly, BUT that it drops the connection occasionally. It's not 
consistent (maybe 2 out of 5 downloads from the internet through the 
router to the webserver will drop), and the connections are being made, 
so it's not a fundamental configuration issue. It's something more 
sneaky. I'm thinking that there's something in the kernel or network 
driver that isn't functioning properly, or maybe a buffer that is 
becoming full and abandoning the connection?


snip



-Jesse

Bob Chiodini wrote:


Jesse Cantara wrote:

Hello,

I am trying to figure out a problem I'm having using CentOS on a 
machine as a router. The short story is: any traffic routed through 
the router seems to get disconnected at random occasionally.


snip


Someone recently posted a thread about a similar complaint to the lists
recently. IIRC, the [SOLVED] post mentioned a problem with MTU being
smaller than some of the packets received at one point, causing
fragmentation, and the next step not being to reassemble the packet
because of a certain flag being set.

I don't remember which bit the flag was and no little about this, but I
remember the general gist.

Maybe your problem is similar?

HTH
--
Bill

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] NFS filesystem recommendations please (and problems with XFS)

2007-07-23 Thread Andreas Micklei
Am Samstag, 21. Juli 2007 schrieb Patrick - South Valley Internet:
 With all this said, I'd like to use XFS, if it indeed is going to be the
 fastest for the solution I want to implement.  If you guys can help me
 get that installed by telling me what I need - great!  If you think XFS
 isn't going to work as efficiently and fast as I want it to, and there
 is another filesystem (such as ext3) that will be more stable and just
 as fast in my setup, I'm all ears.

Just to add some positive feedback: I implemented XFS on an x86_64 box running 
CentOS around here. The machine is an NFS, Samba and Emailserver (kolab, that 
means postfix + cyrus imapd). The machine has a Hardware SCSI RAID with 8 10k 
U320 HDs. So far we had a minor issue with some small undeletable files that 
could be tracked down to a XFS bug (which is fixed by now). Other than that 
the box has been running rock stable. We started with CentOS 4.2 or 4.3 and 
are now at 4.5 via continuous yum updates.

Before the machine went into production I had about two weaks for doing heavy 
benchmarking and some reinstalls. Using XFS and tuning the parameters of the 
RAID array gave a massive performance boost. I also tried tuning ext3 but got 
only about half the throughput than with XFS, so I decided to go XFS.

Of course these results depend on usage pattern, hardware, etc. So do your own 
benchmarks. I myself asked our heavies nfs users for their homedirs or parts 
of it and benchmarked by copying these around in parrallel. This was quite 
enlightening and much more useful than artifical benchmarks.

regards,
Andreas Micklei

-- 
Andreas Micklei
IVISTAR Kommunikationssysteme AG
Ehrenbergstr. 19 / 10245 Berlin, Germany
http://www.ivistar.de

Handelsregister: Berlin Charlottenburg HRB 75173
Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE207795030
Vorstand: Dr.-Ing. Dirk Elias
Aufsichtsratsvorsitz: Dipl.-Betriebsw. Frank Bindel
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] GNU pascal

2007-07-23 Thread Martin Marques

Is there a package for CentOS of GNU/Pascal?

--
 21:50:04 up 2 days,  9:07,  0 users,  load average: 0.92, 0.37, 0.18
-
Lic. Martín Marqués |   SELECT 'mmarques' ||
Centro de Telemática|   '@' || 'unl.edu.ar';
Universidad Nacional|   DBA, Programador,
del Litoral |   Administrador
-
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Re: Printer Driver 2180

2007-07-23 Thread Scott Silva
Berth Sumah spake the following on 7/22/2007 7:27 PM:
 Im having problem with my 5.0 centos. it seems that my printer driver
 isnt in the centos library. Could anyone tell me where i could find it.
 Thanks all
  
Let me get out my crystal ball Magic 8-ball what manufacturer made his
printer?


-- 

MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] GFS/LVM/RAID1 recovery question

2007-07-23 Thread James Fidell
Tru Huynh wrote:
 On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:07:57PM +0100, James Fidell wrote:
 ...
   lvcreate -m 1 ... /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd
 
 or use pvreate /dev/md0 (md raid1 mirror of sda/sdb/sdc)?

AIUI, MD isn't cluster-{aware,safe} though, so I could end up with all
the servers that can see the physical disks trying to do stuff with the
mirrors individually, making a horrible mess?

(In my configuration, all servers mount the iSCSI devices and I'm using
LVM/clvmd to allow them to keep everything sane and remove any single
point of failure.)

 where sd[bc] are the mirrored (iSCSI) PVs in the VG and sdd is the log.
 I have this working and can write data to the filesystem on one machine
 in the cluster and see it appear elsewhere etc.

 What I now want to do is to test what happens when I disable one
 of the mirrors and then restore it with clean disks.
 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/docs/4.5/SAC_Cluster_Logical_Volume_Manager/mirrorrecover.html

Perfect.  That's exactly what I was after.  Thank you.

James
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Can we get a newer version of madwifi on rpmforge?

2007-07-23 Thread Robert Moskowitz

Jim Perrin wrote:

On 7/23/07, Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


There are over 60 visible access points in most locations (actually not
that may APs, but an SSID for b/g, another for a, another for 802.1x
TKIP, another for 802.1x CCMP, argh!) and I think there are some serious
table handling problems.  It would be nice to be current with code...


Rather than posting to this list, and dag directly, don't you think
you'd have better luck asking on the rpmforge user's list? 

oops.

Too many protocols on the brain.

From the SIP working group, to the NEA, skipping speerment, then on to 
enum.


OVERLOAD!!!

:)


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS based router dropping connections

2007-07-23 Thread Jesse Cantara

Actually, I spoke too soon.

Setting the NIC to 100 Mbit did not fix the issue, I just happened to 
misdiagnose a fix, because it seemed to be working for quite some time, 
but it is back to the old problems.


Basically, I'm at wits end right now. I'm going to go down to the 
colocation and see if they can test the network drop into our cabinet. 
If it's not that, then I'm convinced it's the tg3 driver.


-Jesse

Jesse Cantara wrote:
The problem ended up being the tg3 Broadcom NIC kernel module driver. 
It doesn't work properly at Gigabit speeds. Turning it down to 100 
Megabit fixed the issue. Does anybody know where I should report this bug?


Thanks for all your help,
-Jesse

William L. Maltby wrote:

On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 12:29 -0400, Jesse Cantara wrote:

Hi Bob,

snip


The issue I'm having is that external traffic is being forwarded 
properly, BUT that it drops the connection occasionally. It's not 
consistent (maybe 2 out of 5 downloads from the internet through the 
router to the webserver will drop), and the connections are being 
made, so it's not a fundamental configuration issue. It's something 
more sneaky. I'm thinking that there's something in the kernel or 
network driver that isn't functioning properly, or maybe a buffer 
that is becoming full and abandoning the connection?


snip



-Jesse

Bob Chiodini wrote:


Jesse Cantara wrote:

Hello,

I am trying to figure out a problem I'm having using CentOS on a 
machine as a router. The short story is: any traffic routed through 
the router seems to get disconnected at random occasionally.


snip


Someone recently posted a thread about a similar complaint to the lists
recently. IIRC, the [SOLVED] post mentioned a problem with MTU being
smaller than some of the packets received at one point, causing
fragmentation, and the next step not being to reassemble the packet
because of a certain flag being set.

I don't remember which bit the flag was and no little about this, but I
remember the general gist.

Maybe your problem is similar?

HTH
--
Bill

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Asuscom 56000 serial modem

2007-07-23 Thread Alain Reguera Delgado

On 7/22/07, Oskar Stolc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
 Hi guys,

 I am trying to connect through an asuscom (56000) serial modem in
 CentOS5, but when tried Kppp tool it sais no device found. I can't see
 /dev/modem :(
 What could you suggest in this cases ?

Is your modem an external one?


yes, it's a gray external one.

If so

- connect it to your machine's serial port (/dev/ttyS0 or /dev/ttyS1)


I connected the modem to /dev/ttyS0 port. Then used the network gui
interface to add the modem connection. Done this, tried to activate
the connection and after some modem lights blinking the modem get lost
forever. As if the channel ttyS0 kept busy trying to connect without a
response, or something like that. I needed to restart the system.


- try to communicate with it with 'minicom'
- ensure it responds your 'at' commands

Once done, you are safe to create a /dev/modem symlink to your ttySx device.


well, think I need to connect to the modem first, or not ?.

As a side note, when I tried with the CentOS 4.4 live CD it connected
perfectly well.



Oskar



Thanks Oskar.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos