Re: [CentOS-es] ayuda con conexion a otro servidor
¿Has probado con mount para ver dónde está montado el recurso remoto? Salu2 El Dom, 16 de Septiembre de 2007, 22:41, luiso escribió: Amigos de la lista, soy nuevo con el CentOS hay una una opcion en el menu en el CentOS con escritorio GNOME, sobre conectarse a un lugar remoto, ahora bien pongo la direccion IP del lugar remoto e indico que es un servidor windows, la conexion se efectúa sin problemas cuando pongo el passwd del administrador, y puedo acceder a los datos sin problemas y efectuar cualquier operacion de copiado o pegado de archivos, desde esa ventana que me abre el CentOS, todo OK. ahora bien he intentado acceder a esta conexion que crea el CentOS desde la consola y no hay forma en que la encuentre, es decir quiero tener acceso mediante consola a esa conexion que crea el CentOS, para poder visualizar los datos del servidor windows. Alguna idea, de donde se encuentra esto o donde más o menos encontrarlo. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] Re: centos] CentOS 5 on IA64
Sorry to be a bit of a stickler, but can we please change the topic for each architecture. I am monitoring all posts containing IA64 or Itanium to see when CentOS 5 support will be available and this thread has been throwing *a lot* of false positives. Thanks, and again, sorry to be so sticky. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Segmentation fault YUM
umair shakil wrote: I can right now define Segmentation Fault When a process is trying to exceed the memroy location of what allocated to it, we normally face in this case segmentation fault. That is not correct. a segfault is when a process will try to access memory that its not authorised to, eg. trying to write to memory marked read-only is the classic case. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Compiling mod_webauth on CentOS 5 - krb dependency failure
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 12:43:18PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] alleged: Hello all, When I try to compile the mod_webauth module on CentOS 5, the dependencies for Kerberos fail. I have the Kerberos libs installed, which is what I assume it's complaining about. Ideas? Is there an RPM missing? Here's some of what I found: [EMAIL PROTECTED] webauth-3.5.4]# ./configure checking for gcc... gcc What's with the double spacing? checking for krb5-config... no $ yum provides krb5-config ... krb5-devel.i386 1.3.4-49 installed Matched from: /usr/kerberos/bin/krb5-config [EMAIL PROTECTED] webauth-3.5.4]# rpm -qa | grep -i krb krb5-libs-1.5-26 krb5-libs-1.5-29 krb5-server-1.5-29 pam_krb5-2.2.11-1 pam_krb5-2.2.11-1 krb5-workstation-1.5-26 You haven't installed krb5-devel. pgpjjmoQaZOgg.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] nVdia C15G chipset and GeForce 6100 on board graphix controller - SOLVED
Chris Geldenhuis wrote: Jim Perrin wrote: On 8/29/07, Chris Geldenhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am new to installing drivers etc. Could you possible give me a few pointers to help me along the way. RPMForge makes installing the nvidia drivers reasonably easy. Simply run 'yum install nvidia-x11-drv' and then reboot. Instructions for RPMForge are at http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories/RPMForge Hi again, I have followed Jim's instructions to add the RPMforge repository and to download the nvidia-x11-drv driver from there. When rebooting after this the system instruct me to re-configure the X11 configuration, when doing this using the gui screens provided I cannot select a screen but can select the nVidia card and then the nVidia driver. The configuration generated still does not work - I attach a copy of the Xorg.0.log generated. In this log there is a mention of using the GLX driver/module from nVidia. While inspecting /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions I noticed a sub-directory nvida that contained a file libglx.so. I renamed the libglx.so file in /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions and copied the file in the nvidia sub directory into it's place - and rebooted. The reconfiguration of X11 still would not allow me to select a screen and also did not work. I attach a copy of the Xorg log Xorg.0.log.2 where it seems as if the correct GLX module has now been found but without giving me a useable X11 configuration. Any suggestion on how to proceed from here would be welcome - if entails getting another graphics card please suggest a suitable card that will run without hassles. TIA ChrisG snip /snip Hi All, I have finally found the solution to the problem of the invisible mouse pointer - from a tip given to me by Chris from Tangent Systems. When you insert an Option line as shown below in the Device section of the xorg.conf file the mouse pointer stays visible. Section Device Identifier Videocard0 Driver nv Option HWCursoroff EndSection ChrisG ChrisG ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Installation troubles
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:11:35PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: This is one the major issues with the Linux process these days, as you move from kernel to kernel there is almost zero assurance of driver abi/api stability - and that in turn creates a situation like this wherein one kernel works while another does not. Its enough of a situation that on a lot of platforms sysadmins will not upgrade a kernel unless they really really need to. On CentOS and the EL codebase, this isnt so much of an issue because upstream do some work on trying to make sure they dont break driver compatibility. If they do break this compatibility, its easy to detect. And most of the heavy lifting is getting done by a fairly simple shell script called weak-modules, based in /sbin/ and comes from module-init-tools.rpm weak-modules will basically take a given driver .ko and check what other kernels installed at this time will work with it, it will then create the symlinks for each of those kernels to point at this .ko. It will then check each initrd in the /boot dir, and update each initrd for kernels it found compatible with the driver. Rather than overwrite the initrd, it will create a new one with the same-name but followed by a number. It will then edit /etc/grub.conf and add a *new* section for this just created initrd. So when you reboot the machine you have the choice to boot the kernel.rpm shipped initrd or the newly updated one. Ok, so how does this work ? lets say you have drivers ( from install time ) in /lib/modules/2.6.8-8.el5/updates/ 1) sudo to root 2) find /lib/modules/2.6.8-8.el5/updates | /sbin/weak-modules --add-modules This didn't work. I did: ls -1 /lib/modules/2.6.8-8.el5/updates | /sbin/weak-modules --add-modules 3) watch the blinking lights, depending on how many kernels you have installed it could be a few seconds 4) check /boot/ and make sure you have the new updated initrd's for all kernels you thought it would work with. 5) check /etc/grub.conf for new sections [1] 6) reboot with whatever kernel + initrd you want All worked fine for the 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen kernel. 7) all further kernels brought down by yum from the centos repos will auto magically get this driver included in the initrd. ( rpm -q --scripts kernel-version will show you what happens in the post install section, and how weak-updates does an --add-kernel ) New kernel was released, so I did yum update. The new kernel boots, but does not see the raid devices on the 3ware card. the update also seems to have removed my install kernel (2.6.18-8.el5xen). Did that step on something? If I boot the 2.6.18-8.1.8el5xen kernel, I still see my raid devices, so it worked for the first update... I will try this in a few moments. One last observation though, 3Ware has a newer driver for the updated kernel. If I wish to use it, is it a simple matter of replacing the 3w-9xxx.ko file with the appropriate one? If it is more complicated than that, where do I find info about this issue? well, in this case, build that .ko agains the oldest kernel-devel you have on the machine ( ideally, I should say only against the installtime kernel, but lots of people dont have that hanging around :/ ) and weak-modules should do its magic. There is a pre-built (by 3ware) .ko file for 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen I don't know what to do with it though. Slight change in plan, I did this braindump and you get to write the wiki page :) I've never done a wiki page, but I'm okay with writing this all up, once I understand it. I can put what you wrote above (with some minor fixes), but it didn't exactly work out for further kernel updates... Not sure what to say about that. You might also want to look and see how the /lib/modules/kver/extras/ directory contents are handled and include some info on that. Since that would basically address non install time .ko The extras dir in the orig install kernel tree is empty. So is the weak-updates dir, since the kernel update removed the install kernel??? The 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen tree has a weak updates tree which appears to duplicate the old lib/modules tree. It looks like this: /lib/modules/2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen/weak-updates/lib/modules/2.6.18-8.el5xen/updates/3w-9xxx.ko So I'm completely confused at this point... -chuck ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Compiling mod_webauth on CentOS 5 - krb dependency failure
Hello all, When I try to compile the mod_webauth module on CentOS 5, the dependencies for Kerberos fail. I have the Kerberos libs installed, which is what I assume it's complaining about. Ideas? Is there an RPM missing? Here's some of what I found: [EMAIL PROTECTED] webauth-3.5.4]# ./configure checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed snip checking for krb5-config... no checking for library containing res_search... no checking for library containing __res_search... -lresolv checking for library containing crypt... -lcrypt checking for krb5_init_context in -lkrb5... no checking for krb5int_getspecific in -lkrb5support... no checking for library containing pthread_setspecific... -lpthread checking for krb5int_setspecific in -lkrb5support... no checking for krb5_cc_default in -lkrb5... no configure: error: cannot find usable Kerberos v5 library [EMAIL PROTECTED] webauth-3.5.4]# However, when I search via rpm, I see: [EMAIL PROTECTED] webauth-3.5.4]# rpm -qa | grep -i krb krb5-libs-1.5-26 krb5-libs-1.5-29 krb5-server-1.5-29 pam_krb5-2.2.11-1 pam_krb5-2.2.11-1 krb5-workstation-1.5-26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] webauth-3.5.4]# Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] strange chgrp behavior
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 13:16 +0200, Tomas Ruprich wrote: Thanks for your reply and your time, i've reported it to centos bug tracking system. I will try it also on RHEL and if it occurs, i'll sent it also to the RH. Good. If and when they close it, will you post in this thread so folks know the result? ISTM it's a bug and should be reported on both CentOS and RH tracking systems. Two errors are apparent. One may be difficult to correct. As you originally discovered, the user ID is being change during execution of the command to change a group. And it is using the ID from the symbolic link owner, as you later noticed. The 2nd bug is a recursion into the original directory via the symbolic link when dereference is not suppressed. IMO, recursion should not occur, but I know from a programming background that it takes a little foresight, thought and intense effort to avoid this sort of trap. I think, that dereferrence should occure (at least for my coreutils version); man chgrp: --dereference affect the referent of each symbolic link, rather than the symbolic link itself (this is the default) I don't have an issue with dereference. My issue is is the recursion into the directories that the symbolic link points to. This is a well known potential problem when symbolic links point to places that have symbolic links that (eventually) lead to the original symbolic link again. Some packages (tar and find, IIRC and maybe some others) try to avoid this trap in various ways. IMO, all utilities that normally recurse in an environment wherein looping via such mechanisms as symbolic links is possible should have some basic checks trying to prevent eternal loops from occurring. I do think the recursion, as reported in your OP, is a bug in that the utility has not (apparently) made an attempt to prevent an interminable loop. But, that's my opinion from the days when we developers were expected to do rigorous design and testing, rather than leaving it (intentionally) to our users to suffer and report. snip -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Server Virtualization
Hello, I work for a school in a New Zealand university and we are wanting to implement Server Virtualization for both CentOS and Windows systems. So I thought I would ask here what experience people have had with this and what issues that you all think should be considered? From my own research it seems that VMWare or Xen are really the two major products to be considered, are there any others I should be considering ? Is anyone running Linux Guest O/S's inside a Windows host ?? And if so can you share your reasons for this? Anyway thank you for your time and any experiences / knowledge you are willing to share :) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] openoffice 2.3 on centos 4.5
Would I have to be concerned about any issues if I put open office 2.3 on centos 4.5? Anyone done it? Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Server Virtualization
Quoting Clint Dilks [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, I work for a school in a New Zealand university and we are wanting to implement Server Virtualization for both CentOS and Windows systems. So I thought I would ask here what experience people have had with this and what issues that you all think should be considered? Xen is great - however you will need Full virtualisation support in your hardware. These are shown as the ?vmx? flag for Intel or ?svm? for AMD CPUs in /proc/cpuinfo. If you are running Windows guest in a linux Xen domain, you will want to pay for the Xen licenses. This gives you access to the windows drivers for disk and network etc - which improves performance immensely. From my own research it seems that VMWare or Xen are really the two major products to be considered, are there any others I should be considering ? I can only really speak for Xen... Is anyone running Linux Guest O/S's inside a Windows host ?? And if so can you share your reasons for this? I'd say VMWare would be the way to do this - if you really had to. Anyway thank you for your time and any experiences / knowledge you are willing to share :) The learning curve for Xen is huge. I would suggest a few things though if you decide to use it. 1) Setup your Dom0 (the host) disk to use LVM. You will want to make MANY partitions. Use a raw disk partition for disk access instead of a file as the disk - performance is much better this way. 2) If you're going to add Windows as a guest OS, make sure you get the Windows drivers. This is something you have to pay for, but the performance increase will be well worth it. 3) use 'xm top' on Dom0 to monitor what your guest systems are doing. Get yourself a multi processor system, and divide up usage between physical CPUs. This way, you get the best usage of your hardware. 4) Get lots and lots of RAM. We use systems with 8Gb RAM. We give the hypervisor 256Mb, and then chunks of 256Mb, 512Mb or 1Gb to each DomU depending on usage. -- Steven Haigh Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.crc.id.au Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Server Virtualization
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 11:20 +1200, Clint Dilks wrote: Hello, I work for a school in a New Zealand university and we are wanting to implement Server Virtualization for both CentOS and Windows systems. So I thought I would ask here what experience people have had with this and what issues that you all think should be considered? From my own research it seems that VMWare or Xen are really the two major products to be considered, are there any others I should be considering ? Is anyone running Linux Guest O/S's inside a Windows host ?? And if so can you share your reasons for this? Anyway thank you for your time and any experiences / knowledge you are willing to share :) I use Xen personally and at work I work with VMware. I don't have any machines personally that have hardware virtualization extensions in the processor, so I'm only doing para-virtualization with CentOS 5 as host and guests. Documentation seems a little sparse if you want to deviate from the default configuration too much in Xen. Other than that I've been very happy with Xen. At work we've been playing with VMware Infrastructure 3. If you are going to go the VMware route, this is by far the best bang for your buck. You are able to manage several VM hosts under one interface, and if you are running Windows as a guest you can do some pretty neat things (coming soon for the Linux side). I've also used the free version, VMware Server (also called GSX, Infrastructure comes with the version called ESX) on both Windows and Linux...prefer using Linux though as the host (much better stability and low-level options if you are into customizing the environment). Any more questions, like specifics, please ask. I've been using Xen and VMware for several months now. -- Timothy Selivanow [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux System Administrator EasyStreet Online Services, Inc. http://www.easystreet.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Server Virtualization
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 11:20 +1200, Clint Dilks wrote: Hello, I work for a school in a New Zealand university and we are wanting to implement Server Virtualization for both CentOS and Windows systems. So I thought I would ask here what experience people have had with this and what issues that you all think should be considered? From my own research it seems that VMWare or Xen are really the two major products to be considered, are there any others I should be considering ? Those are probably the top contenders. Is anyone running Linux Guest O/S's inside a Windows host ?? And if so can you share your reasons for this? No. If there are reasons, they are beyond my understanding. :-) Anyway thank you for your time and any experiences / knowledge you are willing to share :) I use VMware Server Workstation - primarily for testing new Linux releases and for running Windows apps under Linux. Have run some services for testing purposes and find performance and functionality to be pretty good. You may want to join the new CentOS Virtualization list to find a more targeted audience: http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Server Virtualization
Clint Dilks wrote: Hello, I work for a school in a New Zealand university and we are wanting to implement Server Virtualization for both CentOS and Windows systems. So I thought I would ask here what experience people have had with this and what issues that you all think should be considered? Irrespective of which virtual server solution you choose be aware that virtualization brings with it steep storage requirements. Think of providing around 1TB of RAID10 storage for 20 guests. VMs do lots of tiny random IOs so for 20 guests split between 2 servers I provide 500GB of RAID10 to each via iSCSI SAN. From my own research it seems that VMWare or Xen are really the two major products to be considered, are there any others I should be considering ? Not really. Is anyone running Linux Guest O/S's inside a Windows host ?? And if so can you share your reasons for this? I do at work so I can prototype some Linux stuff on my Windows box. Anyway thank you for your time and any experiences / knowledge you are willing to share :) I would try both VMware server and Xen on CentOS, if you have 2 servers set them up side by side and plugged into your storage SAN. Run them through their paces, do some benchmarks get a feel for ease of use and maintenance. When your ready and have a budget you can move up to the commercial versions, ESX and Xen Enterprise. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] openoffice 2.3 on centos 4.5
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:26:22 -0400 Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] took out a #2 pencil and scribbled: Would I have to be concerned about any issues if I put open office 2.3 on centos 4.5? Anyone done it? Jerry I have it running on a fully updated CentOS 4 machine and it seems to be okay. I've only used the writer portion for a few documents though. I've been fairly absent from that laptop today. Sincerely -- Alex White [EMAIL PROTECTED] Life is a prison, death is a release ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] openoffice 2.3 on centos 4.5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:26:22 -0400 Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] took out a #2 pencil and scribbled: Would I have to be concerned about any issues if I put open office 2.3 on centos 4.5? Anyone done it? Jerry I have it running on a fully updated CentOS 4 machine and it seems to be okay. I've only used the writer portion for a few documents though. I've been fairly absent from that laptop today. I don't recall having any issues on 4.5 either. I've used both the writer and spreadsheet apps without incident. Seems pretty solid and I'm trying to rely on it more so I can wean myself off M$ Office for good. Best, ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Segmentation fault YUM
Dear Karanbir, Please can u please explain me that trying to exceed the memroy or try to gain the memory not authorized is there making any difference.. OR please i suppose my mistake was not using google exact defination :) Regards, Umair Shakil On 9/17/07, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: umair shakil wrote: I can right now define Segmentation Fault When a process is trying to exceed the memroy location of what allocated to it, we normally face in this case segmentation fault. That is not correct. a segfault is when a process will try to access memory that its not authorised to, eg. trying to write to memory marked read-only is the classic case. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Compiling mod_webauth on CentOS 5 - krb dependency failure
Dear, Have u installed krb-deval package if yes then possibblly the reqiuired library is not in that PATH. Regards, Umair Shakil ETd On 9/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, When I try to compile the mod_webauth module on CentOS 5, the dependencies for Kerberos fail. I have the Kerberos libs installed, which is what I assume it's complaining about. Ideas? Is there an RPM missing? Here's some of what I found: [EMAIL PROTECTED] webauth-3.5.4]# ./configure checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed snip checking for krb5-config... no checking for library containing res_search... no checking for library containing __res_search... -lresolv checking for library containing crypt... -lcrypt checking for krb5_init_context in -lkrb5... no checking for krb5int_getspecific in -lkrb5support... no checking for library containing pthread_setspecific... -lpthread checking for krb5int_setspecific in -lkrb5support... no checking for krb5_cc_default in -lkrb5... no configure: error: cannot find usable Kerberos v5 library [EMAIL PROTECTED] webauth-3.5.4]# However, when I search via rpm, I see: [EMAIL PROTECTED] webauth-3.5.4]# rpm -qa | grep -i krb krb5-libs-1.5-26 krb5-libs-1.5-29 krb5-server-1.5-29 pam_krb5-2.2.11-1 pam_krb5-2.2.11-1 krb5-workstation-1.5-26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] webauth-3.5.4]# Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Server Virtualization
Dear, Yes, VMware is the product which is basically in the market. I have installed and use once i mean about 2 years back. Well, through my research, VMware is only good if your are in a Tesing Environment. It is not recommended in the production environment. Because of following reasons, It uses Kernel Resources upto high and u need very High End Server IF u are using 3 etc applications like (DNS, WEB, FTP), if the machine goes down all your three application goes down High Demanding of memory Regards, Umair Shakil ETD On 9/18/07, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Clint Dilks wrote: Hello, I work for a school in a New Zealand university and we are wanting to implement Server Virtualization for both CentOS and Windows systems. So I thought I would ask here what experience people have had with this and what issues that you all think should be considered? Irrespective of which virtual server solution you choose be aware that virtualization brings with it steep storage requirements. Think of providing around 1TB of RAID10 storage for 20 guests. VMs do lots of tiny random IOs so for 20 guests split between 2 servers I provide 500GB of RAID10 to each via iSCSI SAN. From my own research it seems that VMWare or Xen are really the two major products to be considered, are there any others I should be considering ? Not really. Is anyone running Linux Guest O/S's inside a Windows host ?? And if so can you share your reasons for this? I do at work so I can prototype some Linux stuff on my Windows box. Anyway thank you for your time and any experiences / knowledge you are willing to share :) I would try both VMware server and Xen on CentOS, if you have 2 servers set them up side by side and plugged into your storage SAN. Run them through their paces, do some benchmarks get a feel for ease of use and maintenance. When your ready and have a budget you can move up to the commercial versions, ESX and Xen Enterprise. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
