Re: [CentOS-virt] virbr0 and libvirtd
Joseph L. Casale wrote on Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:50:47 -0600: Are there any ramifications to doing this the way I did? I'd say no. I did the same. Obviously, the libvirtd/dnsmasq combination is there to provide something that VMWare provides with their VMNet stuff. If you don't need it, then you don't need it ;-) Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
RE: [CentOS-virt] Convirt + CentOS 5
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Alan Murrell wrote on Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:13:00 -0700: 1.) What sort of issues (if any) did you run in to when installing Xen 3.2 over top of the the 3.0.3 that comes with CentOS 5.1? there are several bugs in the python code, have been mentioned in this list over the past weeks. Actually, I think that this xen 3.2 package is one of the buggiest packages I have seen of a major and mature Linux software in some time. Fortunately, the bugs all seem to be minor ones in the GUI. Actually the 3.2 packages are really technology previews, the refinement goes into the Xen Server products. The last 3.1 packages were just as buggy. I have high hopes though for 3.2.1, there are a lot of fixes incorporated between 3.2 and 3.2.1 and it looks like it could be very stable. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-virt] Xen 3.2.0 available in any repository?
Hi folks, Is Xen 3.2.0 available on any CentOS repository or perhaps third party repository? Will using this package require compiling from source? Thanks for your help. /sf ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:21:28PM -0600, Joseph L. Casale alleged: Use rsync to copy the changes to the lv? That would be only be possible if the lv had an fs that rsync and the os under rsync understood:) If these are exported as block devices into xen vm's or as iscsi targets for example it gets trickier. rsync doesn't have fs-specific knowledge. It just reads and writes files. Put another way, what fs does rsync not undestand? -- Garrick Staples, GNU/Linux HPCC SysAdmin University of Southern California Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html pgpV7kIDIvNgX.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back
Garrick Staples wrote: On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:21:28PM -0600, Joseph L. Casale alleged: Use rsync to copy the changes to the lv? That would be only be possible if the lv had an fs that rsync and the os under rsync understood:) If these are exported as block devices into xen vm's or as iscsi targets for example it gets trickier. rsync doesn't have fs-specific knowledge. It just reads and writes files. Put another way, what fs does rsync not undestand? a raw block device, as they said. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 12V computing?
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 12:16 AM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ben Gore wrote: I have run CentOS 4.5 on this platform without problems. I wouldn't expect any issues with CentOS 5+. are these Via C7 processors i686 compliant? Yes they are. Everything from the Nehemiah and newer cores. -- Daniel ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] install perl with setuid emulation
Dear All, i would like to know how to install perl with setuid emulation since the default centos 5 wont install with the setuid emulation apprecite your help regards simon -- Network ADMIN: -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] install perl with setuid emulation
Mail Administrator wrote: Dear All, i would like to know how to install perl with setuid emulation since the default centos 5 wont install with the setuid emulation Install perl-suidperl. Ralph pgpaiR6jwQdDl.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos issues
On 4/13/08, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 16:56 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, hamood Iqbal wrote: snip but if i cant solve it i will switch back to suse. Did you consider it to be unfriendly to compare one project with another and threaten to go back if you don't get an answer. Did you consider it to be unfriendly to imply that the problems you have are caused by CentOS and not by an action of yourself ? To be honest, I personally wouldn't mind if you would go back using OpenSUSE because we do not need a community of whiners that lacks any social skills. But if you intend to stay and be part of the CentOS community, I hope you can change your attitude. Geez folks! Let's have a little thicker skin. Nothing wrong, IMO, with what was posted. OP was just sharing a strategic decision that might be made. I found nothing offensive there. -- Bill i was having a gripe about my work at home on friday and my partner waited until i had finished and said: would you like some cheese with that whine? made me laugh, thought i'd share mike ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] MS Exchange to CentOs (multiuser)
Either way...just as long as the mail gets to CentOs...although, I have control over the CentOS box and NOT over the Exchange server. Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. Systems Programmer MCP, MCP+I, MCSE RHCE American Income Life Insurance Co. Phone: (254)761-6649 1200 Wooded Acres Dr.Fax: (254)741-5777 Waco, Texas 76710 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Milton Calnek Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 9:46 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange to CentOs (multiuser) So you want exchange to forward the mail to the centos? Or you want the centos to pickup the mail from the exchange? Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: Is there a way to get mail from a MS Exchange server that is addressed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than the [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that users on host.domain.com can read their mail on that host (CentOS). (I'm assuming that Exchange needs to know about host.domain.com, somehow.) Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. Systems Programmer MCP, MCP+I, MCSE RHCE American Income Life Insurance Co. Phone: (254)761-6649 1200 Wooded Acres Dr.Fax: (254)741-5777 Waco, Texas 76710 _ This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Milton Calnek BSc, A/Slt(Ret.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 306-717-8737 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos _ This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] MS Exchange to CentOs (multiuser)
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 10:50 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange to CentOs (multiuser) Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: Is there a way to get mail from a MS Exchange server that is addressed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than the [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that users on host.domain.com can read their mail on that host (CentOS). (I'm assuming that Exchange needs to know about host.domain.com, somehow.) The way mailers would know about host.domain.com is to look it up in DNS. They will try for an MX record first, then an A record if the MX doesn't exist. If that directs it to the right place, port 25 is open between them, and the receiving machine is configured properly everything should work. -- Les Mikesell --- 1) host.domain.com is in the DNS 2) No MX record for host.domain.com 3) host.domain.com has smtp tcp0 0 localhost.localdomain:smtp *:* LISTEN 4) Configured properly? Don't know, what is proper? Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. Systems Programmer MCP, MCP+I, MCSE RHCE American Income Life Insurance Co. Phone: (254)761-6649 1200 Wooded Acres Dr.Fax: (254)741-5777 Waco, Texas 76710 _ This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] logging items to the console using centos 5.1
I need to (occasionally) automatically drop out of X11 mode, recompile something, and then reboot. I can drop out of X11 with init 3, works fine. I use chvt 1 to ensure I am on virtual terminal 1 My recompile and reboot also work. The piece that doesnt work is: make | tee $LOGFILE I was expecting the output (stdout) to be virtual terminal 1. My LOGFILE has all commands in it from my successful recompile but I dont see anything on virtual terminal 1. How do I get the output of my make to show on the console and also in my logfile? Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back
Joseph L. Casale wrote: Nah :) I want to sanp a volume, mount the snap, do my `stuff`, if I like it, I can merge into the primary copy and continue or dump the snap and go back... You need to start by reading some of the docs on LVM2. eg. nothing stops you from mounting a snapshot back onto the same mountpoint you snaped from. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange to CentOs (multiuser)
Why not just have the CentOS users pop/imap to the exchange server to read mail (t-bird/mutt/evolution)? If that doesn't work, fetchmail will pickup mail and deliver it to the localhost's mailserver. The users will want a cron job to do this on a regular basis. Or have the CentOS users change their email profile so that a copy is forwarded to the CentOS boxes. Of course the CentOS boxes need static ip's for this to work. Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: Either way...just as long as the mail gets to CentOs...although, I have control over the CentOS box and NOT over the Exchange server. Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. Systems Programmer MCP, MCP+I, MCSE RHCE American Income Life Insurance Co. Phone: (254)761-6649 1200 Wooded Acres Dr.Fax: (254)741-5777 Waco, Texas 76710 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Milton Calnek Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 9:46 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange to CentOs (multiuser) So you want exchange to forward the mail to the centos? Or you want the centos to pickup the mail from the exchange? Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: Is there a way to get mail from a MS Exchange server that is addressed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than the [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that users on host.domain.com can read their mail on that host (CentOS). (I'm assuming that Exchange needs to know about host.domain.com, somehow.) Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. Systems Programmer MCP, MCP+I, MCSE RHCE American Income Life Insurance Co. Phone: (254)761-6649 1200 Wooded Acres Dr.Fax: (254)741-5777 Waco, Texas 76710 _ This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Milton Calnek BSc, A/Slt(Ret.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 306-717-8737 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] logging items to the console using centos 5.1
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do I get the output of my make to show on the console and also in my logfile? Use script. Type script logfile.txt, it will open a new shell. After that, everything you type and the output of commands will go to the terminal and to the logfile. After that, just use exit or Ctrl-D to exit the shell, it will stop logging. For more details, man script. It's part of the util-linux rpm, so you'll certainly have it installed already. HTH, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange to CentOs (multiuser)
Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 10:50 AM --- tcp0 0 localhost.localdomain:smtp *:* LISTEN 4) Configured properly? Don't know, what is proper? Not quite. Assuming you are using sendmail, and have sendmail-cf installed, edit /etc/mail/sendmail.mc. Find the line that looks something like DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA')dnl Remove the Addr=127.0.0.1, part. This will cause your sendmail to listen on all interfaces. If your machine is directly connected to the internet, having it listen on all interfaces may not be what you want. -- Milton Calnek BSc, A/Slt(Ret.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 306-717-8737 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back
You need to start by reading some of the docs on LVM2. eg. nothing stops you from mounting a snapshot back onto the same mountpoint you snaped from. I understand that, but where I am unsure is how space in the vg relates to this? Will this not require much additional space, what if I need to do this a continued basis? jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Openssh 5 RPMs
Hi, here are the unofficial C5 openssh5 rpms: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-ssh/stable/i386/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-ssh/stable/x86_64/ Regards, David Hrbáč PS:Some of you may find C4 versions of these. Please do not use them, they are not OK yet. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Custom SELinux file contexts?
Hi. Do anyone know of some place to put custom SELinux file context specifications? I would prefer not to append lines to /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts but rather put one or more similar files somewhere. A file_contexts.d firectory would be nice, but it isn't available. Just creating your own file_contexts.local file does not work, I already tried. I'm running CentOS 5.1 Regards Ingemar ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back
Joseph L. Casale wrote: You need to start by reading some of the docs on LVM2. eg. nothing stops you from mounting a snapshot back onto the same mountpoint you snaped from. I understand that, but where I am unsure is how space in the vg relates to this? Will this not require much additional space, what if I need to do this a continued basis? You make the snapshot with a given size. That size should be large enough to hold all expected _changed_ /or/ _new_ stuff. Whatever is not changed or new, lvm simply points back to the original lv. If you need to add more space to the snapshot, do an lvextend on it. -- Toby Bluhm Alltech Medical Systems America, Inc. 30825 Aurora Road Suite 100 Solon Ohio 44139 440-424-2240 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Custom SELinux file contexts?
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Ingemar Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but rather put one or more similar files somewhere. A file_contexts.d firectory would be nice, but it isn't available. Just creating your own file_contexts.local file does not work, I already tried. /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.local works fine for me. Did you use restorecon afterwards to relabel the relevant files/directories? -- Daniel ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Custom SELinux file contexts?
Ingemar Nilsson wrote: /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.local works fine for me. Did you use restorecon afterwards to relabel the relevant files/directories? It works now, I don't know what mistake I made. Thanks anyway. It only works when using the name file_contexts.local though, using a subdirectory like file_contexts.d or a file named file_contexts.somethingelse does not work. Regards Ingemar ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Custom SELinux file contexts?
Daniel de Kok wrote: On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Ingemar Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but rather put one or more similar files somewhere. A file_contexts.d firectory would be nice, but it isn't available. Just creating your own file_contexts.local file does not work, I already tried. /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts.local works fine for me. Did you use restorecon afterwards to relabel the relevant files/directories? It works now, I don't know what mistake I made. Thanks anyway. Regards Ingemar ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] MS Exchange to CentOs (multiuser)
Ahgood catch. That worked great! Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. Systems Programmer MCP, MCP+I, MCSE RHCE American Income Life Insurance Co. Phone: (254)761-6649 1200 Wooded Acres Dr.Fax: (254)741-5777 Waco, Texas 76710 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Milton Calnek Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 9:44 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] MS Exchange to CentOs (multiuser) Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 10:50 AM --- tcp0 0 localhost.localdomain:smtp *:* LISTEN 4)Configured properly? Don't know, what is proper? Not quite. Assuming you are using sendmail, and have sendmail-cf installed, edit /etc/mail/sendmail.mc. Find the line that looks something like DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA')dnl Remove the Addr=127.0.0.1, part. This will cause your sendmail to listen on all interfaces. If your machine is directly connected to the internet, having it listen on all interfaces may not be what you want. -- Milton Calnek BSc, A/Slt(Ret.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 306-717-8737 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos _ This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] redirecting outside connections to https on apache
Hi friends, There are about 15 applications hosted on different in our infrastructure mostly running on apache/iis/tomcat. We have a frontend apache server running on Centos 4.4 64bit which make these applications accessible to outside world. For the applications which are running on tomcat we are running jkmount to make these applications available without mentioning tomcat ports. For apache/iis applications we are using ProxyPass. The issue we are facing is that we are not able to make these applications accessible through https automatically means if the user is not from within the LAN then the http link should automatically redirected to https. We already have GoDaddy stamped ssl certificate on this apache frontend server but we are struggling for rules for outside world. What is the best way to make these applications accessible to outside world through https connections only that is if somebody use http://xx.xx.com/xx to use the application it should be redirected to https we don't have the requirement for https connections from within the LAN but definitely for outside connections. JkMount /team/* team JkMount /team team Then we have rules for this in the workers.properties file ProxyPass /public http://my.testing.com/public ProxyPassReverse /public https://my.testing.com/public Please let me know do you need any further inputs Thanks Regards Ankush ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] redirecting outside connections to https on apache
Quoting ankush grover [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi friends, There are about 15 applications hosted on different in our infrastructure mostly running on apache/iis/tomcat. We have a frontend apache server running on Centos 4.4 64bit which make these applications accessible to outside world. For the applications which are running on tomcat we are running jkmount to make these applications available without mentioning tomcat ports. For apache/iis applications we are using ProxyPass. The issue we are facing is that we are not able to make these applications accessible through https automatically means if the user is not from within the LAN then the http link should automatically redirected to https. We already have GoDaddy stamped ssl certificate on this apache frontend server but we are struggling for rules for outside world. What is the best way to make these applications accessible to outside world through https connections only that is if somebody use http://xx.xx.com/xx to use the application it should be redirected to https we don't have the requirement for https connections from within the LAN but definitely for outside connections. JkMount /team/* team JkMount /team team Then we have rules for this in the workers.properties file ProxyPass /public http://my.testing.com/public ProxyPassReverse /public https://my.testing.com/public You can force to ssl by using something like this with mod_rewrite RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://www.domain.com/$1 [R,L] Details on how to select your condition for this statement is available at: http://askapache.info/trunk/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritecond ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Interface bonding?
On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 11:06 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Can you post the ifcfg files used and the output of /proc/net/bonding/bond0? This is for one system. I have another one that I've been working on too, and it too doesn't work with 'port group 2' on the two switch ports that it is connected to (haven't tried adding 'spanning-tree portfast' to those yet). I've been focusing on this one first as it is an iSCSI target, and the other one is running Xen so it's a bit more complicated (DomU can't get out at the moment with the bond, but Dom0 can, still no increased throughput...) --Tim _ / A political man can have as his aim the realization of freedom, \ | but he has no means to realize it other than through violence. | \ -- Jean Paul Sartre / - \ \ \ \ /\ ( ) .( o ). DEVICE=bond0 IPADDR=69.30.2.20 NETMASK=255.255.255.224 NETWORK=69.30.2.0 BROADCAST=69.30.2.31 ONBOOT=yes BOOTPROTO=none USERCTL=no GATEWAY=69.30.2.1 DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=00:B0:D0:DF:DB:68 ONBOOT=yes USERCTL=no MASTER=bond0 SLAVE=yes DEVICE=eth1 HWADDR=00:B0:D0:DF:DB:69 ONBOOT=yes IPADDR= NETMASK= USERCTL=no MASTER=bond0 SLAVE=yes # Intel Corporation 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] DEVICE=eth2 HWADDR=00:02:B3:36:55:BE ONBOOT=no USERCTL=no MASTER=bond0 SLAVE=yes alias eth0 e100 alias eth1 e100 alias eth2 e100 alias scsi_hostadapter aic7xxx alias bond0 bonding options bond0 miimon=80 mode=4 Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.1.2 (January 20, 2007) Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation Transmit Hash Policy: layer2 (0) MII Status: down MII Polling Interval (ms): 80 Up Delay (ms): 0 Down Delay (ms): 0 802.3ad info LACP rate: slow Active Aggregator Info: Aggregator ID: 1 Number of ports: 1 Actor Key: 9 Partner Key: 1 Partner Mac Address: 00:00:00:00:00:00 Slave Interface: eth0 MII Status: up Link Failure Count: 0 Permanent HW addr: 00:b0:d0:df:db:68 Aggregator ID: 1 Slave Interface: eth1 MII Status: up Link Failure Count: 0 Permanent HW addr: 00:b0:d0:df:db:69 Aggregator ID: 2 Slave Interface: eth2 MII Status: up Link Failure Count: 0 Permanent HW addr: 00:02:b3:36:55:be Aggregator ID: 3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:54:36PM -0700, John R Pierce alleged: Garrick Staples wrote: On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:21:28PM -0600, Joseph L. Casale alleged: Use rsync to copy the changes to the lv? That would be only be possible if the lv had an fs that rsync and the os under rsync understood:) If these are exported as block devices into xen vm's or as iscsi targets for example it gets trickier. rsync doesn't have fs-specific knowledge. It just reads and writes files. Put another way, what fs does rsync not undestand? a raw block device, as they said. Well, I was thinking about vm and such, assuming at some point there was an OS reading the filesystem tht can run rsync. But I concede the point, it definitely makes things tricky. -- Garrick Staples, GNU/Linux HPCC SysAdmin University of Southern California Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html pgpoi3ZvHFJNd.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos issues
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008, William L. Maltby wrote: On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 16:56 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, hamood Iqbal wrote: snip but if i cant solve it i will switch back to suse. Did you consider it to be unfriendly to compare one project with another and threaten to go back if you don't get an answer. Did you consider it to be unfriendly to imply that the problems you have are caused by CentOS and not by an action of yourself ? To be honest, I personally wouldn't mind if you would go back using OpenSUSE because we do not need a community of whiners that lacks any social skills. But if you intend to stay and be part of the CentOS community, I hope you can change your attitude. Geez folks! Let's have a little thicker skin. Nothing wrong, IMO, with what was posted. OP was just sharing a strategic decision that might be made. I found nothing offensive there. A strategic decision is the last thing that pops up in my mind when reading that mail. You don't switch distributions because you cannot solve something (or because people are not helping you to solve something). Especially not if it is something that a Google search could have helped you with. But apparently it works to mention switching distributions :) Maybe I should go back to Slackware ? -- -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back
Well, I was thinking about vm and such, assuming at some point there was an OS reading the filesystem tht can run rsync. But I concede the point, it definitely makes things tricky. It does seem there is some talk about the functionality, I assume it will happen sooner or later... jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] merge an lvm snapshot back
Joseph L. Casale wrote: Well, I was thinking about vm and such, assuming at some point there was an OS reading the filesystem tht can run rsync. But I concede the point, it definitely makes things tricky. It does seem there is some talk about the functionality, I assume it will happen sooner or later... indeed, most of the snapshot systems I've seen to date have a 'revert' function which makes the specified snapshot the 'default' live version. OTOH, most of these only support readonly snapshots. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] redirecting outside connections to https on apache
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Barry Brimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting ankush grover [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi friends, There are about 15 applications hosted on different in our infrastructure mostly running on apache/iis/tomcat. We have a frontend apache server running on Centos 4.4 64bit which make these applications accessible to outside world. For the applications which are running on tomcat we are running jkmount to make these applications available without mentioning tomcat ports. For apache/iis applications we are using ProxyPass. The issue we are facing is that we are not able to make these applications accessible through https automatically means if the user is not from within the LAN then the http link should automatically redirected to https. We already have GoDaddy stamped ssl certificate on this apache frontend server but we are struggling for rules for outside world. What is the best way to make these applications accessible to outside world through https connections only that is if somebody use http://xx.xx.com/xx to use the application it should be redirected to https we don't have the requirement for https connections from within the LAN but definitely for outside connections. JkMount /team/* team JkMount /team team Then we have rules for this in the workers.properties file ProxyPass /public http://my.testing.com/public ProxyPassReverse /public https://my.testing.com/public You can force to ssl by using something like this with mod_rewrite RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://www.domain.com/$1 [R,L] Details on how to select your condition for this statement is available at: http://askapache.info/trunk/mod/mod_rewrite.html#rewritecond To clarify, the proxy pass configuration is irrelevant. The https rewrite rule is applied to the outside facing web server for whatever URL patterns you wish to secure. You don't need to do anything to the back-end web server. Here's a useful example on the rewrite: http://tinyurl.com/6l7erl -- Jeff ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] GNOME issue. Seeking Guidance.
Below is what has been documented on this issue, and I am needing further guidance. Essetially, I am running in GNOME, but it isn't working properly. Can some one help. |--| |I am new to the Centos ISO and was looking for a forum, when I came across this. If it isn't something you can help, | |can you help point me in the right direction? Here are the answers you requested from me: | | | |I go to the applications menu at the top left and click to pull down | |I click on Add/Remove Software but nothing happens. | | | |I am using GNOME | | | |I go to the system menu at the top left and click to pull down, and then click admin and then click network. Nothing | |happens. | | | |It is like the GNOME is not working properly. It did work until I pulled down the software updates after the initial | |intstallation. | | | |Again, thank you. | |--| |--| |There are several ways to get help with CentOS: | | | |The CentOS web forums are at http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/ [^] | |The CentOS email lists are at http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos [^] | |Realtime forums (IRC) can be found via http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=8 [^] | | | |In your case, I am expecting that the pirut or system-helper command are not working correctly. Please try the| |following. | | | |Right click on the desktop and choose Open Terminal. In the terminal type pirut. A popup window should occur asking | |for the root password. If it doesnt, then there is a permission problem that might have 'broken' during an update.| | | |In the terminal type ls -l /usr/bin/pirut. And you should get output like the following:| | | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /usr/bin/pirut | |lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 12 2007 /usr/bin/pirut - consolehelper* | | | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /usr/bin/consolehelper | |-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5920 Mar 14 2007 /usr/bin/consolehelper* | | | | | |If it is a permission problem, we can try the following:
[CentOS] Re: Centos issues
on 4-13-2008 7:56 AM Dag Wieers spake the following: On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, hamood Iqbal wrote: Hi i just swicthed from opensuse and having some issues that were not present in suse. 1. add/remove software (package management)does not work. Opensuse flawless working. 2. how to add dvd as repository. in suse it was automatic. i choose centos b/c it has the longest upgrade cycle. i am using centos 5.1 on vmware server but if i cant solve it i will switch back to suse. Did you consider it to be unfriendly to compare one project with another and threaten to go back if you don't get an answer. Did you consider it to be unfriendly to imply that the problems you have are caused by CentOS and not by an action of yourself ? To be honest, I personally wouldn't mind if you would go back using OpenSUSE because we do not need a community of whiners that lacks any social skills. But if you intend to stay and be part of the CentOS community, I hope you can change your attitude. Bad day today? ;-P -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Centos issues
on 4-14-2008 11:09 AM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following: Dag Wieers wrote: On Sun, 13 Apr 2008, William L. Maltby wrote: On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 16:56 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, hamood Iqbal wrote: snip but if i cant solve it i will switch back to suse. Did you consider it to be unfriendly to compare one project with another and threaten to go back if you don't get an answer. Did you consider it to be unfriendly to imply that the problems you have are caused by CentOS and not by an action of yourself ? To be honest, I personally wouldn't mind if you would go back using OpenSUSE because we do not need a community of whiners that lacks any social skills. But if you intend to stay and be part of the CentOS community, I hope you can change your attitude. Geez folks! Let's have a little thicker skin. Nothing wrong, IMO, with what was posted. OP was just sharing a strategic decision that might be made. I found nothing offensive there. A strategic decision is the last thing that pops up in my mind when reading that mail. You don't switch distributions because you cannot solve something (or because people are not helping you to solve something). Especially not if it is something that a Google search could have helped you with. But apparently it works to mention switching distributions :) Maybe I should go back to Slackware ? Who cares what the OP does. He can pour gasoline on his computer, light it on fire while dancing around it naked chanting Gobe-Gobe-Gobe for all I care. Hey, that is how I clean the spyware from Windows PC's! I better get my patent filed ... ;-P -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Installing Centos 5 on HP DL140 G3
I want to install CentOS 5.1 with hardware RAID on an HP DL140 G3 server that I have here for testing. It prompts me for a storage controller. According to this readme page for the latest driver at ftp://ftp.hp.com/pub/softlib2/software1/pubsw-linux/p1463703615/v44436/mpt linux-4.00.13.01-2.rhel5.i686.dd.gz.txt CentOS 5 should already contain a default driver version contained in the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 installation CD I would rather like to use that than go the complicated route of providing the latest HP driver. That HP Internal Port SAS/SATA HBA with RAID actually is a RAID controller from LSILogic and I tried to load all four LSILogic drivers provided on the driver list, but none is accepted. Does somebody have experience with this server/RAID controller and can tell me if I can go somehow with the drivers provided by CentOS 5.1 or do I need to go with the drivers provided by HP? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GNOME issue. Seeking Guidance.
If there is anyone who has experianced this, can you please give me further guidance. I have tried everything below, and still can not get anything to come up with GNOME. Strangest thing. Somehow, it worked prior to installing the centos updates and Zenoss's Network Monitoring utility. Now I can't get it to work to save my life...Not quite sure were to start looking.. Please Advise. Very Respectfully, Christy Below is what has been documented on this issue, and I am needing further guidance. Essetially, I am running in GNOME, but it isn't working properly. Can some one help. |--| |I am new to the Centos ISO and was looking for a forum, when I came across this. If it isn't something you can help, | |can you help point me in the right direction? Here are the answers you requested from me: | | | |I go to the applications menu at the top left and click to pull down | |I click on Add/Remove Software but nothing happens. | | | |I am using GNOME | | | |I go to the system menu at the top left and click to pull down, and then click admin and then click network. Nothing | |happens. | | | |It is like the GNOME is not working properly. It did work until I pulled down the software updates after the initial | |intstallation. | | | |Again, thank you. | |--| |--| |There are several ways to get help with CentOS: | | | |The CentOS web forums are at http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/ [^] | |The CentOS email lists are at http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos [^] | |Realtime forums (IRC) can be found via http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=8 [^] | | | |In your case, I am expecting that the pirut or system-helper command are not working correctly. Please try the| |following. | | | |Right click on the desktop and choose Open Terminal. In the terminal type pirut. A popup window should occur asking | |for the root password. If it doesnt, then there is a permission problem that might have 'broken' during an update.| | | |In the terminal type ls -l /usr/bin/pirut. And you should get output like the following:| | | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /usr/bin/pirut | |lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 12 2007 /usr/bin/pirut - consolehelper* | | | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /usr/bin/consolehelper | |-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5920 Mar 14 2007 /usr/bin/consolehelper* | | | | | |If it is a permission problem, we can try the following: | | | |1) Login as root (in the terminal window you can do a su - root | |2) Type the following: | |/sbin/restorecon -R -v /etc /usr /sbin /bin /var | | | |This will take a long time, but it should restore selinux permissions to some items that either zenoss or an update | |accidently broke | | | |After this command finishes try the following: | |Top Menu - Applications - Add/Remove Software | | | |If it pops up now.. then it was an selinux item. If it does not then there is a problem with consolehelper talking| |getting root which might have occured with the zenoss install. I would first check with them to see if it is a known | |issue on their part, and then with the forums. | | | |/usr/bin/consolehelper is a program that allows a normal user to get super-user/administrator rights. So there are 2 | |pirut programs. /usr/bin/pirut calls consolehelper which calls some programs to make sure you can become 'root' If you| |know the root password then it will call /usr/sbin/pirut which is the real program, but only runs as 'root' not a | |normal user. | |--| |---| |Yes and no luck yet. I have contacted Zenoss, however they seem to think it is with Centos. Since it is a free | |utility, they are very reluctant to offer support. If I were to pay, then they would graciously put for the effort | |to help. So I am on my own. I don't mind the CLI, actually I prefer it, but my co-workers are were I am concerned. | |I want them to be able to use it, and be comfortable with it. But with out being able to use the GNOME (GUI). They | |are reluctant to do so. That is my fear. They know nothing about Linux or UNIX, and only know router's and switches| |CLI. If you can offer any guidance, I graciously welcome it all | |---|
Re: [CentOS] GNOME issue. Seeking Guidance.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If there is anyone who has experianced this, can you please give me further guidance. I have tried everything below, and still can not get anything to come up with GNOME. Strangest thing. Somehow, it worked prior to installing the centos updates and Zenoss's Network Monitoring utility. Now I can't get it to work to save my life...Not quite sure were to start looking.. well, if it works before you did X Y, then either X or Y probably broke it, so I'd probably try to back out Y and see if its OK. Of course, its also possible backing out Y doesn't quite return it to the state it was in prior to the installation of Y, whereupon the next thing to try would be starting over, clean install the base system, verify functionality, install X (the centos updates) and verify functionality, then try Y (Zenoss) again... if it breaks only after that last step, the logical conclusion is that something Zenoss did broke it, whereupon I'd have to suggest going back to that community rather than this one. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos issues
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 20:03 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008, William L. Maltby wrote:
On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 16:56 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
snip
Geez folks! Let's have a little thicker skin. Nothing wrong, IMO, with
what was posted. OP was just sharing a strategic decision that might be
made. I found nothing offensive there.
A strategic decision is the last thing that pops up in my mind when
reading that mail.
You don't switch distributions because you cannot solve something (or
because people are not helping you to solve something). Especially not if
it is something that a Google search could have helped you with.
I suspect a difference in ... age, background, personality causes our
different POV on this.
As soon as reading the OP, I deduced that little or no research was done
and no attempt to RTFM had occured. This could be wrong, but it's
irrelevant to me.
That is the OP's problem. I make it a rule to (*try*) not let other's
problems become mine. Especially of an emotional nature.
I realize that is easier said than done. Especially if one has invested
dedicated work and effort. It does take a fair amount of effort to just
to maintain this attitude. When I was youg and full of piss and vinegar,
I 1) didn't know the rule and 2) would have failed miserably regardless.
Now I am able to figure that the strategy of a lot of folks (based on
observation) is to lay as much effort onto others as possible,
minimizing their own effort. This no longer bothers me *as much* as it
used to. It's like getting pissed off because it is raining.
However, having said all that, my response was not intended to be a
criticism. It was only meant to encourage a less ... *reactive* response
to things such as this, which really only ends up wasting your own time.
If the OP is not inclined to do the research it is doubtful that
anything we post here would have much influence.
I *do* sometimes try to ... educate folks, but only selectively as I
*think* I see something indicating the poster may be amenable to such
education.
But apparently it works to mention switching distributions :)
Only if the OP *thinks* it is a successful bullying* tactic. Then some
satisfaction might be derived. But if such a tactic fails to provoke any
response at all, chance of satisfaction is reduced, IMO.
But it's really just a style difference ('twixt you and me, e.g.). I
really don't have any animosity toward anyone who defends themselves
or their project.
Maybe I should go back to Slackware ?
*chuckle*
That's a stategic decision! ;-)
--
Bill
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Centos issues
on 4-14-2008 3:03 PM William L. Maltby spake the following: On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 20:03 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: On Sun, 13 Apr 2008, William L. Maltby wrote: On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 16:56 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: snip Geez folks! Let's have a little thicker skin. Nothing wrong, IMO, with what was posted. OP was just sharing a strategic decision that might be made. I found nothing offensive there. A strategic decision is the last thing that pops up in my mind when reading that mail. You don't switch distributions because you cannot solve something (or because people are not helping you to solve something). Especially not if it is something that a Google search could have helped you with. I suspect a difference in ... age, background, personality causes our different POV on this. As soon as reading the OP, I deduced that little or no research was done and no attempt to RTFM had occured. This could be wrong, but it's irrelevant to me. That is the OP's problem. I make it a rule to (*try*) not let other's problems become mine. Especially of an emotional nature. I realize that is easier said than done. Especially if one has invested dedicated work and effort. It does take a fair amount of effort to just to maintain this attitude. When I was youg and full of piss and vinegar, I 1) didn't know the rule and 2) would have failed miserably regardless. Now I am able to figure that the strategy of a lot of folks (based on observation) is to lay as much effort onto others as possible, minimizing their own effort. This no longer bothers me *as much* as it used to. It's like getting pissed off because it is raining. However, having said all that, my response was not intended to be a criticism. It was only meant to encourage a less ... *reactive* response to things such as this, which really only ends up wasting your own time. If the OP is not inclined to do the research it is doubtful that anything we post here would have much influence. I *do* sometimes try to ... educate folks, but only selectively as I *think* I see something indicating the poster may be amenable to such education. I have just started to not answer posters that look like they habitually don't do any initial work or research. Kind of a mental blacklist when I remember the OP. Some of them just seem to stand out. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GNOME issue. Seeking Guidance.
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 15:47 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Below is what has been documented on this issue, and I am needing further guidance. Essetially, I am running in GNOME, but it isn't working properly. Can some one help. |--| |I am new to the Centos ISO and was looking for a forum, when I came across this. If it isn't something you can help, | |can you help point me in the right direction? Here are the answers you requested from me: | | | |I go to the applications menu at the top left and click to pull down | |I click on Add/Remove Software but nothing happens. | | | |I am using GNOME | | | |I go to the system menu at the top left and click to pull down, and then click admin and then click network. Nothing | |happens. | | | |It is like the GNOME is not working properly. It did work until I pulled down the software updates after the initial | |intstallation. | | | |Again, thank you. | |--| Christy... pirut is the package manager and it could a number of things that could cause that...perhaps a problem with the rpmdb or a problem with your python installation... First...make sure that there isn't a copy of yum or pirut running... service yum-updatesd stop ps aux|grep pirut and kill whatever process shows up... likewise... ps aux|grep yum and kill whatever process shows up then, perhaps just to clean up your rpmdb... rm /var/lib/rpm/__db* # and answer yes to delete each one then rebuild the db... rpm --rebuilddb Then after all that, you might try pirut again...I would venture to guess that most of us don't use the GUI package manager. Is Zenoss running? that uses python so if it's running, python would seem to be working. The logs are your friend.../var/log/messages is where most of this stuff will be logged. Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] yum update did not complete
I was doing a yum update today. It downloaded all the packages. was doing the next part and my remote connection was lost. so ssh session was killed. When I logged back in I am not sure if the update is done or not. I presume not. I presume it died with my remote session. I do a yum update now and it returns as if there is nothing to update. last I saw it was 30 out of 312 in the installation section. What next? Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] yum update did not complete
I do a yum update now and it returns as if there is nothing to update. last I saw it was 30 out of 312 in the installation section. What next? Check /var/log/yum.log and look at the time/dates of what was/was not done. jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Installing Centos 5 on HP DL140 G3
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 23:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: I want to install CentOS 5.1 with hardware RAID on an HP DL140 G3 server that I have here for testing. It prompts me for a storage controller. Check your BIOS Settings for the controller. May be that it needs to set to Mass Storage if available in the HP Bios. I am not a die hard HP person so check the settings available. I know for a fact this is a problem with other manufactures. Maybe there is a HP Guy or Gal in here some where that can elaborate some more on this for you. According to this readme page for the latest driver at ftp://ftp.hp.com/pub/softlib2/software1/pubsw-linux/p1463703615/v44436/mpt linux-4.00.13.01-2.rhel5.i686.dd.gz.txt CentOS 5 should already contain a default driver version contained in the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 installation CD Then again the MPT Drivers for that controller may have been dropped for that controller. I do know several have been End of Lifed I know this to be true for other high end server manufactures. Support for them ended in RHEL 4. So that would = CentOS 4 as well. I would rather like to use that than go the complicated route of providing the latest HP driver. That HP Internal Port SAS/SATA HBA with RAID actually is a RAID controller from LSILogic and I tried to load all four LSILogic drivers provided on the driver list, but none is accepted. See bios explaination above. Does somebody have experience with this server/RAID controller and can tell me if I can go somehow with the drivers provided by CentOS 5.1 or do I need to go with the drivers provided by HP? Kai -- ~/john OpenPGP Sig:BA91F079 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Installing Centos 5 on HP DL140 G3
Kai Schaetzl wrote: That HP Internal Port SAS/SATA HBA with RAID actually is a RAID controller from LSILogic and I tried to load all four LSILogic drivers provided on the driver list, but none is accepted. HP raids tend to have custom microcode to implement various HP specific features such as media interchange between all their different systems, so they aren't likely going to work with the hardware vendors generic OEM drivers. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] SSH Question relating to Public and Private Keys
Hi People, The Linux Environment I am responsible for is using ssh key pairs to allow access to a number or accounts on a number Linux Servers. I currently have the opportunity to re-design some of this. So I would like to tap into peoples experiences to see what might be some good changes to make. Specifically I have a couple of questions 1. Currently all of the key pairs we are using have empty passphrases is it worth the effort of changing this and setting up ssh-agent compared to what you gain in security by doing this ? 2. At this stage I am going to use RSA Keys of the default size, is this generally the best approach? Thanks for any thoughts, and have a nice day :) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
