[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0533 Important CentOS 3 i386 bind - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0533 bind security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-22.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/bind-chroot-9.2.4-22.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/bind-devel-9.2.4-22.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/bind-libs-9.2.4-22.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/bind-utils-9.2.4-22.el3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/bind-9.2.4-22.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update bind Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpD6us8Md4Yk.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0533 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 bind - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0533 bind security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-22.el3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/bind-chroot-9.2.4-22.el3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/bind-devel-9.2.4-22.el3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/bind-libs-9.2.4-22.el3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/bind-utils-9.2.4-22.el3.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/bind-9.2.4-22.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update bind Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgp1vT4Qg8y9x.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0584 Important CentOS 3 i386 pidgin - security and bug fix update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0584 pidgin security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0584.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/pidgin-1.5.1-2.el3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/pidgin-1.5.1-2.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update pidgin Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpE6YtGyXtR4.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0584 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 pidgin - security and bug fix update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0584 pidgin security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0584.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/pidgin-1.5.1-2.el3.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/pidgin-1.5.1-2.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update pidgin Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpMZPhgXzA15.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] Re: Bind Patch
read the announcement posted and the check the url in there. Edward Casteloes wrote: Hi, I have seen that the 9.3.4 bind patch is available for Centos 5, does this patch rectify the big DNS issue that was just announced yesterday? The reason I ask is according to ISC they recommend updating to 9.3.5-P1 http://www.isc.org/index.pl?/sw/bind/forgery-resilience.php . I am sure you are getting a lot of mail about this, but if you could advise it would be appreciated. Many Thanks, Ed *Edward Casteloes* Operations Manager Esendex Ltd T: +44 (0)115 852 5774 F: +44 (0)115 852 5757 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.esendex.com http://www.esendex.com/ Esendex: Every Message Matters *Confidentiality*: This e-mail (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of [EMAIL PROTECTED], centos-announce@centos.org and may contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or constitutes a trade secret. If you are not [EMAIL PROTECTED], centos-announce@centos.org you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and then delete it from your computer. Messages sent to and from us may be monitored. The views expressed in this message are those of the author Edward Casteloes and do not necessarily represent the views of Esendex Ltd. ** *Security*: This e-mail and any attachments are believed to be free from any virus but it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure this is so. E-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We recommend you observe this when e-mailing us. *Esendex Ltd* is a limited company registered in the UK, with company number 04217280 and having its registered office at 32a Stoney Street • Nottingham • NG1 1LL • United Kingdom. [v1.1 EN] ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0533 Important CentOS 3 ia64 bind - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0533 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-22.el3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/bind-chroot-9.2.4-22.el3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/bind-devel-9.2.4-22.el3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/bind-libs-9.2.4-22.el3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/bind-utils-9.2.4-22.el3.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0533 Important CentOS 3 s390(x) bind - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0533 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-22.el3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/bind-chroot-9.2.4-22.el3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/bind-devel-9.2.4-22.el3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/bind-libs-9.2.4-22.el3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/bind-utils-9.2.4-22.el3.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-22.el3.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/bind-chroot-9.2.4-22.el3.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/bind-devel-9.2.4-22.el3.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/bind-libs-9.2.4-22.el3.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/bind-utils-9.2.4-22.el3.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0533 Important CentOS 4 ia64 bind - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0533 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/bind-chroot-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/bind-devel-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/bind-libs-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/bind-utils-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0533 Important CentOS 4 s390(x) bind - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0533 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/bind-chroot-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/bind-devel-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/bind-libs-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/bind-utils-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/bind-chroot-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/bind-devel-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/bind-libs-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/bind-utils-9.2.4-28.0.1.el4.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0584 Important CentOS 3 ia64 pidgin - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0584 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0584.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/pidgin-1.5.1-2.el3.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0584 Important CentOS 4 ia64 pidgin - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0584 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0584.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/pidgin-1.5.1-2.el4.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0583 Important CentOS 4 ia64 openldap - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0583 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0583.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/compat-openldap-2.1.30-8.c4.5.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/openldap-2.2.13-8.c4.5.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/openldap-clients-2.2.13-8.c4.5.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/openldap-devel-2.2.13-8.c4.5.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/openldap-servers-2.2.13-8.c4.5.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/openldap-servers-sql-2.2.13-8.c4.5.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0584 Important CentOS 3 s390(x) pidgin - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0584 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0584.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/pidgin-1.5.1-2.el3.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/pidgin-1.5.1-2.el3.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0583 Important CentOS 4 s390(x) openldap - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0583 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0583.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/compat-openldap-2.1.30-8.c4.5.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/openldap-2.2.13-8.c4.5.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/openldap-clients-2.2.13-8.c4.5.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/openldap-devel-2.2.13-8.c4.5.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/openldap-servers-2.2.13-8.c4.5.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/openldap-servers-sql-2.2.13-8.c4.5.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/compat-openldap-2.1.30-8.c4.5.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/openldap-2.2.13-8.c4.5.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/openldap-clients-2.2.13-8.c4.5.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/openldap-devel-2.2.13-8.c4.5.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/openldap-servers-2.2.13-8.c4.5.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/openldap-servers-sql-2.2.13-8.c4.5.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-es] Migrar a CentOS 5.2 x86_64
Hola lista, Tengo instalado en mi estación de trabajo CentOS 5.1 i386. He visto en la Web que uno de los beneficios de los 64 bits es que se puede acceder a más RAM, y que es necesario cuando se utiliza 4GB o más; otra mejora que he leído es que se hace más rápida la compresión de vídeo, algo que no hago frecuentemente. También llegó una PC nueva que se usará como servidor. Se usará como servidor de aplicaciones Web, algunas de ellas escritas en Java y como repositorio de código fuente con Subversión como principal candidato. ¿Valdrá la pena instalar en el servidor y en mi estación de trabajo la versión x86_64 de CentOS? Ambas PC tienen 1GB de RAM. Saludos, Rogenry. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Migrar a CentOS 5.2 x86_64
- Mensaje original De: Rogenry Avila Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: centos-es@centos.org Enviado: miércoles, 9 de julio, 2008 16:23:21 Asunto: [CentOS-es] Migrar a CentOS 5.2 x86_64 Hola lista, Tengo instalado en mi estación de trabajo CentOS 5.1 i386. He visto en la Web que uno de los beneficios de los 64 bits es que se puede acceder a más RAM, y que es necesario cuando se utiliza 4GB o más; otra mejora que he leído es que se hace más rápida la compresión de vídeo, algo que no hago frecuentemente. También llegó una PC nueva que se usará como servidor. Se usará como servidor de aplicaciones Web, algunas de ellas escritas en Java y como repositorio de código fuente con Subversión como principal candidato. ¿Valdrá la pena instalar en el servidor y en mi estación de trabajo la versión x86_64 de CentOS? Ambas PC tienen 1GB de RAM. Saludos, Rogenry. - hola. Yo creo que no. He tenido ambas y no noté la diferencia. Ya sé que es algo subjetivo, pero vamos, en escritorio no le ví ninguna ventaja, y si alguna traba con algún programa que otro. Si no tienes más de 4Gb de RAM, yo no lo cambiaría. Por cierto, a veces, la versión 64 bit de JAVA no me funcionaba fino. No se ahora. Estoy hablando de finales de 2007. Un saludo. __ Enviado desde Correo Yahoo! La bandeja de entrada más inteligente. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Migrar a CentOS 5.2 x86_64
Hola: Yo creo que no. He tenido ambas y no noté la diferencia. Ya sé que es algo subjetivo, pero vamos, en escritorio no le ví ninguna ventaja, y si alguna traba con algún programa que otro. Si no tienes más de 4Gb de RAM, yo no lo cambiaría. Por cierto, a veces, la versión 64 bit de JAVA no me funcionaba fino. No se ahora. Estoy hablando de finales de 2007. Yo no he tenido x64 en mi desktop pero no me he preocupado pues siempre leia que alguien se quejaba porque habian muchas aplicaciones que tenian problemas, como el flash player, el openoffice. Estoy hablando de correos viejos, pero pudieras empezar revisando si estos problemas ya fueron resueltos. Puedes instalar el sistema operativo a 64 bits y utilizar aplicaciones en userland a 32 bits, pero tener que utilizar una capa de compatibilidad seria un paso innecesario en una estacion de trabajo. Siempre dejo que sea el uso que le voy a dar al equipo el que dicte el sistema operativo, revisa si x86_64 te brinda algun beneficio real (y tangible) al uso que le quieres dar a la maquina, a lo mejor quieres probarlo (una razon valida, mejor ahora que no tienes presion). Con 1gb de ram, no creo tampoco que tengas mucha diferencia. Te diria que probaras en el server con 64bits y dejaras i386 en el desktop (criterio muy subjetivo debo aclarar). Estaria bueno si alguien tiene experiencias con x86_64 en el escritorio que nos cuente como le ha ido. Saludos Osvaldo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Migrar a CentOS 5.2 x86_64
Yo acabo de instalar en mi desktop Centos 5.2 x86_64 en un core 2 duo de 2.4 GHz y 4 GB en ram y si se nota el cambio.. si he tenido algunos dramas, con algunos plugins de Firefox, como el java y flash, que no funcionan en 64 bits, pero con el ndisplginswraper funcionaron... y ahora instalé en él vmware con Windows XP y funcionan ambos muy bien... O. T. Suarez escribió: Hola: Yo creo que no. He tenido ambas y no noté la diferencia. Ya sé que es algo subjetivo, pero vamos, en escritorio no le ví ninguna ventaja, y si alguna traba con algún programa que otro. Si no tienes más de 4Gb de RAM, yo no lo cambiaría. Por cierto, a veces, la versión 64 bit de JAVA no me funcionaba fino. No se ahora. Estoy hablando de finales de 2007. Yo no he tenido x64 en mi desktop pero no me he preocupado pues siempre leia que alguien se quejaba porque habian muchas aplicaciones que tenian problemas, como el flash player, el openoffice. Estoy hablando de correos viejos, pero pudieras empezar revisando si estos problemas ya fueron resueltos. Puedes instalar el sistema operativo a 64 bits y utilizar aplicaciones en userland a 32 bits, pero tener que utilizar una capa de compatibilidad seria un paso innecesario en una estacion de trabajo. Siempre dejo que sea el uso que le voy a dar al equipo el que dicte el sistema operativo, revisa si x86_64 te brinda algun beneficio real (y tangible) al uso que le quieres dar a la maquina, a lo mejor quieres probarlo (una razon valida, mejor ahora que no tienes presion). Con 1gb de ram, no creo tampoco que tengas mucha diferencia. Te diria que probaras en el server con 64bits y dejaras i386 en el desktop (criterio muy subjetivo debo aclarar). Estaria bueno si alguien tiene experiencias con x86_64 en el escritorio que nos cuente como le ha ido. Saludos Osvaldo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] cyrus-imapd-nntp y cyrus-imapd-murder no existen en centos 5.2
Hola lista : Estoy tratando de instalar un servidor de correos bajos centos 5 con postfix+cyrus-imapd+clamav+spamassassin guiandome de una manual q encontre en la red pero hace referencia a algunos paquetes como el cyrus-imapd-nntp y cyrus- imapd-murder para centos 5 ya no existe o no los instala, mi pregunta es que si estos archivos ya no se necesitan en esta nueva version de centos 5.2 o pudieran decirme cual es la direccion o como los puedo obtener para bajarlos e instalarlo y seguir con la instalacion. muchas gracias de antemano Saludos, Cesar Ramos Alvarado ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
RE: [CentOS] Re: Problems with bind on 5.2
After digging for a bit at arin Near as I can tell, it appears the authoritative dns servers for that specific block are a lil messed up for the moment. Not delegating something properly. Tough to say without admin access to those machines. If you check your netblock at ARIN whois, it says these two dns servers are authoritive OrgName:MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business OrgID: MCICS Address:22001 Loudoun County Pkwy City: Ashburn StateProv: VA PostalCode: 20147 Country:US NetRange: 208.192.0.0 - 208.255.255.255 CIDR: 208.192.0.0/10 NetName:UUNET1996B NetHandle: NET-208-192-0-0-1 Parent: NET-208-0-0-0-0 NetType:Direct Allocation NameServer: AUTH03.NS.UU.NET NameServer: AUTH00.NS.UU.NET Comment:ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE RegDate:1996-05-08 Updated:2006-12-14 dig -x 208.252.226.222 @AUTH00.NS.UU.NET ; DiG 9.2.4 -x 208.252.226.222 @AUTH00.NS.UU.NET ; (1 server found) ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47733 ;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;222.226.252.208.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: 226.252.208.in-addr.arpa. 21600 IN NS auth02.ns.uu.net. 226.252.208.in-addr.arpa. 21600 IN NS auth20.ns.wcom.com. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: auth02.ns.uu.net. 3600IN A 198.6.1.82 When you do a reverse dig at them, one of them will tell you that this ip is authoritive 198.6.1.82 aka That ip is auth02.ns.uu.net Auto03 returns squat... dig -x 208.252.226.222 @AUTH03.NS.UU.NET ; DiG 9.2.4 -x 208.252.226.222 @AUTH03.NS.UU.NET ; (1 server found) ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 32548 ;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;222.226.252.208.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: 226.252.208.in-addr.arpa. 21600 IN NS auth02.ns.uu.net. 226.252.208.in-addr.arpa. 21600 IN NS auth20.ns.wcom.com. So, maybe something is a lil broken in their in-addr.arpa land Could be wrong though... If you dig stuff at the IP address, it seems to at least try to work though Something is not right imho dig -x 208.252.226.222 @198.6.1.82 ; DiG 9.2.4 -x 208.252.226.222 @198.6.1.82 ; (1 server found) ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 62935 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;222.226.252.208.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR ;; ANSWER SECTION: 222.226.252.208.in-addr.arpa. 21600 IN CNAME 222.192.226.252.208.in-addr.arpa. ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: 192.226.252.208.in-addr.arpa. 21600 IN NS mail.sgvwater.com. Best wishes... - rh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Latest samaba updates
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David G. Mackay Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 5:20 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Latest samaba updates When I let yum install the latest samba updates, it ate my smb users file and smb.conf. Once I restored those, it gave me several selinux avc denials, one of which I can't clear up. See http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2965 for details. Anyone else having problems like this? Dave Did it give you a rpm.new.smb.config file on update of Samba? Users file also? I would first check my Selinux file Permissions for Samba. Then file permissions on the shared directories and also make sure that they are replicating on the file in the directory. My idea would be disable SE Linux then make sure all you permissions are correct for the shares, then enable selinux. From you bug report it looks like permision problems. Also you have new selinux options in your smb.conf file, so check them out also. Good Luck, JohnStanley ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] installation method (CentOS 5.2)
2008/7/8 MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Herta Van den Eynde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/7/7 MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is normal for the graphical installation. Is it? 5.1 starts up an X-server and asks these questions in a graphical screen. You might want to check that. IIRC, every time I have actually installed CentOS from the DVD/CD, it goes into the pseudo-graphical text mode for disk test, language and keyboard, and /then/ it starts up the X server to do the rest. That's how I remember it worked when I installed 4.4 and then 5.0 on my home desktop, 5.1 on my laptop (and once on my aux desktop at home) and 5.2 here at work Cheers. mhr Within the past month, I've done 5 installs of CentOS 5.1 on Dell servers via their DRAC interface. They all behaved as I described. Kind regards, Herta -- Life on Earth may be expensive, but it comes with a free ride around the Sun. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: anything in CentOS 5.2 that uses opendns.com when browsing web?
2008/7/9 Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I believe this is completely OT, but I want to be positive. I have a fully up to date CentOS 5.2 box. During the past week, when surfing with Firefox (and today, while testing with Konqueror), frequently, especially when DNS is slow, I am seeing references to opendns.com At times, I end up on opendns.com web pages, instead of at the web site I'm trying to get to. My ISP, the phone company, claims this is not coming from their end and that they are not using opendns.com. I was told they have two (2) DNS servers. I haven't changed anything in my IPCop Firewall/Router box and my belief is that this is coming from my ISP or upstream from there. . If using opendns.com is something new in CentOS 5.2, please let me know. TIA. Could it be that some server you connect to uses opendns' servers for their own DNS service? Which web sites are you trying to surf to when you reach OpenDNS? --Amos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] USB not detected after update
Hi all, currently on a lenovo R60, after upgrading the CentOS 5.1 I cant detect the USB device any more. The initial installation doesnt have any problems at all. Cannot find solution in forums and bugs either. I am not sure if its a bug or wrongly did an update. The lsusb did not show the device. Things I did: (1) updated to 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 i686 then to 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 i686 and here are some of the settings after update (2) Ran lsmod ehci_hcd 33101 0 ohci_hcd 23261 0 uhci_hcd 25421 0 (3) Ran cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 0: 204299 0IO-APIC-edge timer 1:208 0IO-APIC-edge i8042 2: 0 0 XT-PIC cascade 8: 1 0IO-APIC-edge rtc 11: 2 0IO-APIC-edge ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb3, uhci_hcd:usb4, uhci_hcd:usb5, HDA Intel, [EMAIL PROTECTED]::00:02.0 12: 4782 3521IO-APIC-edge i8042 14: 6429 11429IO-APIC-edge libata 15: 27 1370IO-APIC-edge ide1 209: 27 2661 PCI-MSI eth0 NMI: 0 0 LOC: 204143 204151 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 (4) When I plug in usb disk, the /var/log/messages shows Jul 9 12:35:01 localhost kernel: usb 5-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2 Jul 9 12:35:02 localhost kernel: ehci_hcd :00:1d.7: Unlink after no-IRQ? Controller is probably using the wrong IRQ. Jul 9 12:35:12 localhost kernel: usb 5-2: device not accepting address 2, error -110 (5) checked blacklist file, no usb devices like the ehci Before going into CentOS 5.2, I need to verify what is the problem and if it will occur again. Any help on this? --- Join OSCC MAMPU Mailing Lists http://lists.oscc.org.my/mailman/listinfo/oscc-discuss ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NOW: Firefox 3.0 and GNOME crash when trying to view SME Server documentation WAS: OT: anything in CentOS 5.2 that uses opendns.com when browsing web?
snip Jul 8 21:17:05 dell2400 restorecond: Will not restore a file with more than one hard link (/etc/resolv.conf) No such file or directory snip The above MIGHT be related to your other thread ... if there is an issue with the /etc/resolv.conf file, there will be a problem with name lookups. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NOW: Firefox 3.0 and GNOME crash when trying to view SME Server documentation WAS: OT: anything in CentOS 5.2 that uses opendns.com when browsing web?
snip OK, I can verify that for me (CentOS-5.2 updated, Firefox-3.0-2.el5.centos) this link: http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:Administration_Manual:Booklet Causes X to crash. I can replicate it every time I try with Firefox under CentOS 5, but it works fine with Konqueror. An EeePC and a laptop running Ubuntu don't have any problems accessing this page with Firefox. snip These are the relevant log entries (I think) Jul 8 21:17:06 dell2400 gconfd (lanny-3906): Received signal 15, shutting down cleanly Jul 8 21:17:06 dell2400 gconfd (lanny-3906): Exiting Can some on with RHEL-5.2 try that link and see if it causes a similar issue in RHEL-5? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NOW: Firefox 3.0 and GNOME crash when trying to view SME Server documentation WAS: OT: anything in CentOS 5.2 that uses opendns.com when browsing web?
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 06:56 -0400, Johnny Hughes wrote: snip OK, I can verify that for me (CentOS-5.2 updated, Firefox-3.0-2.el5.centos) this link: http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:Administration_Manual:Booklet Causes X to crash. I can replicate it every time I try with Firefox under CentOS 5, but it works fine with Konqueror. An EeePC and a laptop running Ubuntu don't have any problems accessing this page with Firefox. snip These are the relevant log entries (I think) Jul 8 21:17:06 dell2400 gconfd (lanny-3906): Received signal 15, shutting down cleanly Jul 8 21:17:06 dell2400 gconfd (lanny-3906): Exiting Can some on with RHEL-5.2 try that link and see if it causes a similar issue in RHEL-5? Crashed X like a powerless Lear Jet - glides like a homesick brick. snip sig stuff HTH -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NOW: Firefox 3.0 and GNOME crash when trying to view SME Server documentation WAS: OT: anything in CentOS 5.2 that uses opendns.com when browsing web?
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 06:39 -0400, Johnny Hughes wrote: snip Jul 8 21:17:05 dell2400 restorecond: Will not restore a file with more than one hard link (/etc/resolv.conf) No such file or directory snip The above MIGHT be related to your other thread ... if there is an issue with the /etc/resolv.conf file, there will be a problem with name lookups. I get this all the time Jul 9 07:16:43 centos501 restorecond: Will not restore a file with more than one hard link (/etc/resolv.conf) No such file or directory Never bothered to investigate yet, no other symptoms indicating brokeness. snip sig stuff -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Total lockup caused by Shift-{print screen}
Robert Nichols wrote: System is CentOS 5.2 fully updated on an Intel i686. Suggestions about what component should receive the bugzilla report are welcome. Are you able to recreate it? It happened to me once, I've never seen the issue again after that. Ralph pgpWVgW0tY523.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 41, Issue 4
Important CentOS 3 i386 bind - security update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0533 bind security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-22.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/bind-chroot-9.2.4-22.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/bind-devel-9.2.4-22.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/bind-libs-9.2.4-22.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/bind-utils-9.2.4-22.el3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/bind-9.2.4-22.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update bind Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080709/c9104308/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 9 Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:19:39 +0200 From: Tru Huynh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0533 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 bind - security update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0533 bind security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-22.el3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/bind-chroot-9.2.4-22.el3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/bind-devel-9.2.4-22.el3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/bind-libs-9.2.4-22.el3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/bind-utils-9.2.4-22.el3.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/bind-9.2.4-22.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update bind Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080709/c116aaea/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 10 Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:20:19 +0200 From: Tru Huynh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0584 Important CentOS 3 i386 pidgin -security and bug fix update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0584 pidgin security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0584.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/pidgin-1.5.1-2.el3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/pidgin-1.5.1-2.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update pidgin Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080709/35a36c9e/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 11 Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:20:34 +0200 From: Tru Huynh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0584 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 pidgin -security and bug fix update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0584 pidgin security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0584.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/pidgin-1.5.1-2.el3.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/pidgin-1.5.1-2.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update pidgin Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080709/8e89a97c/attachment-0001.bin -- ___ CentOS
[CentOS] pnm2ppa gone, in any repo?
I can't get my HP DeskJet 712C to print via cups. I believe the reason is that according to http://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2007-May/msg2.html the pnm2ppa filter got dropped between RHEL 4 and RHEL 5, or between Fedora 6 and RHEL 5, depending on how you look at it. Foomatic still generates the pnm2ppa.xml file, but there is no pnm2ppa binary filter installed, so any print attempt ends with an error message. I don't find that any repo I have installed has picked this up for x86_64 architecture. Do I need to add a repo? Has this not been an issue for enough people that someone has made it available from a repo? Right now this has been a show-stopper on upgrading from Centos 4 to 5, as it is hard to use the workstation without a printer. Any help appreciated. Ted Miller Indiana, USA ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Total lockup caused by Shift-{print screen}
Ralph Angenendt wrote: Robert Nichols wrote: System is CentOS 5.2 fully updated on an Intel i686. Suggestions about what component should receive the bugzilla report are welcome. Are you able to recreate it? It happened to me once, I've never seen the issue again after that. Ralph 100% repeatable on two different machines. -- Bob Nichols NOSPAM is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] sudoers
Hi, I need to run /bin/mount and /sbin/mount.cifs commands as nobody user (it has (bin/bash shell). So, I've edited /etc/sudoers and added: Cmnd_AliasCMD_MOUNT = /bin/mount Cmnd_AliasCMD_CIFS ) = /sbin/mount.cifs nobody ALL = NOPASSWD: CMD_MOUNT nobody ALL = NOPASSWD: CMD_CIFS But when I run the command as nobody (in the shell), I get the error: mount error 1 = Operation not permitted Any ideas ? Any help would be appreciated. Warm Regards, Mário Gamito ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: pm-utils - ATrpms updates a system package on the stable branch
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 02:34:01PM -0700, Scott Silva wrote: I think a big problem comes when a repo wants to build packageX, but it requires fancywidgetv2.1. But the base system only has fancywidgetv1.9. How would you get packagex without the possibility of breaking something unless fancywidgetv2.1 has backwards compatibility with fancywidgetv1.9? I completely agree that this is one of the worse situation in multi-repo land today, let me detail on that: First of all even if fancywidgetv2.1 were backwards compatible to fancywidgetv1.9 the promise of no replacemenet cannot be fulfilled, e.g. the task is to provide the two packages in a way that they don't remove/break fancywidgetv1.9 in any way. There are two ways, you either package up fancywidgetv2.1 in a way that it coinstalls with other versions w/o breaking them. This works rather well with libraries that had an soname bump. ATrpms packages these as libfancywidget3-...-...rpm, where 3 is the SONAME. The other way is to move both out of stable and into testing. Or to the non-ATrpms speaking folks: Move it out of the repo that guarantees no replacements and into one that doesn't. That way the user needs to *consiously* choose to replace a package from base. Note that in most cases the replacement packages are no worse than the others. In fact since they usually just turn on a feature or update the package they are probably even safer than using the less tested non-replacement packages. But since there are people that disagree with that opinion and beacuse Open Source is about choice we are trying hard to please everyone and push the choice to the user. But the structuring needs to be done at the server side. How would a yum/smart/etc plugin know that packagex needs fancywidgetv2.1 over fancywidgetv1.9 unless there is a manual hard requirement in the package or a soname bump by happenstance? And wrt manual versioned dependencies, who is really that disciplined to do that? I have a couple of packages in Fedora requiring say python = 2.2 and I was repeatedly asked why I don't drop it -- the dependencies are known to be there. Less dependencies make the specfile more readable. So client side filtering needs a lot of love from packagers and a rethinking about minimal specfiles and if we do need human resources to do that, let's do it properly on the server side and keep packaging styles as they are. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how do I find out which nameserver returns a DNS query?
Ok, sorry, let me re-phrase. I want to know on my own server, which of my nameservers replied to the DNS query. In this example 4.2.2.1 is our ISP's upstream DNS server, which is configured in /etc/resolv.conf - so it should technically appear there. But, let's say I query host1.myserver.co.za - and myserver.co.za is on another server, and has ns1.myserver.co.za, ns2.myserver.co.za, ns3myserver.co.za ns4.myserver.co.za So, as far as I know, any one of those can reply (round robbin DNS?), but I would like to know which one replies for this particular dig. Is that possible? I don't want to specify a server to query, I want to find out which of the 4 returns the query. If it's a cached reply, does it mean I won't see it? is dig +trace host what you are looking for? if not then the bind-users mailing list is a fantastic resource for all dns queries (pun intended) mike ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sudoers
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Mário Gamito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I need to run /bin/mount and /sbin/mount.cifs commands as nobody user (it has (bin/bash shell). So, I've edited /etc/sudoers and added: Cmnd_AliasCMD_MOUNT = /bin/mount Cmnd_AliasCMD_CIFS ) = /sbin/mount.cifs nobody ALL = NOPASSWD: CMD_MOUNT nobody ALL = NOPASSWD: CMD_CIFS But when I run the command as nobody (in the shell), I get the error: mount error 1 = Operation not permitted Any ideas ? Any help would be appreciated. Warm Regards, Mário Gamito May be it is a stupid question but did you execute the command with sudo in logged in as user nobody [EMAIL PROTECTED] sudo /bin/mount[.cifs] -- Tharun Kumar Allu == ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Centos4 audio problem
Hi, I am running centos4u5 on dell precision m4300 laptop. I installed vlc player and i am able to watch the videos,but i am not able to hear audio.when i do system-config-soundcard i am getting the below error. system-config-soundcard Wrong card index 0... ALSA lib pcm_hw.c:1207:(_snd_pcm_hw_open) Invalid value for card aplay: main:550: audio open error: No such device My installed kernel and alsa rpm are uname -a Linux demo.xxx.com 2.6.9-55.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Apr 20 17:03:35 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux rpm -qa |grep alsa alsa-driver-1.0.15-63.el4 alsa-lib-1.0.15-33.el4 alsa-lib-devel-1.0.15-33.el4 alsa-utils-1.0.13-22.el4.at Kindly tell me how to troubleshoot and make audio up and running on my centos box. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how do I find out which nameserver returns a DNS query?
On Wed, July 9, 2008 10:17 am, Michael Simpson wrote: Ok, sorry, let me re-phrase. I want to know on my own server, which of my nameservers replied to the DNS query. In this example 4.2.2.1 is our ISP's upstream DNS server, which is configured in /etc/resolv.conf - so it should technically appear there. But, let's say I query host1.myserver.co.za - and myserver.co.za is on another server, and has ns1.myserver.co.za, ns2.myserver.co.za, ns3myserver.co.za ns4.myserver.co.za So, as far as I know, any one of those can reply (round robbin DNS?), but I would like to know which one replies for this particular dig. Is that possible? I don't want to specify a server to query, I want to find out which of the 4 returns the query. If it's a cached reply, does it mean I won't see it? At the end of your dig reply you will see the following.. ;; Query time: 26 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) ;; WHEN: Wed Jul 9 10:49:40 2008 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 297 That tells you which server answered the query. HTH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sudoers
Yes, I do. On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Tharun Kumar Allu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Mário Gamito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I need to run /bin/mount and /sbin/mount.cifs commands as nobody user (it has (bin/bash shell). So, I've edited /etc/sudoers and added: Cmnd_AliasCMD_MOUNT = /bin/mount Cmnd_AliasCMD_CIFS ) = /sbin/mount.cifs nobody ALL = NOPASSWD: CMD_MOUNT nobody ALL = NOPASSWD: CMD_CIFS But when I run the command as nobody (in the shell), I get the error: mount error 1 = Operation not permitted Any ideas ? Any help would be appreciated. Warm Regards, Mário Gamito May be it is a stupid question but did you execute the command with sudo in logged in as user nobody [EMAIL PROTECTED] sudo /bin/mount[.cifs] -- Tharun Kumar Allu == ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how do I find out which nameserver returns a DNS query?
Brian wrote: On Wed, July 9, 2008 10:17 am, Michael Simpson wrote: Ok, sorry, let me re-phrase. I want to know on my own server, which of my nameservers replied to the DNS query. In this example 4.2.2.1 is our ISP's upstream DNS server, which is configured in /etc/resolv.conf - so it should technically appear there. But, let's say I query host1.myserver.co.za - and myserver.co.za is on another server, and has ns1.myserver.co.za, ns2.myserver.co.za, ns3myserver.co.za ns4.myserver.co.za So, as far as I know, any one of those can reply (round robbin DNS?), but I would like to know which one replies for this particular dig. Is that possible? I don't want to specify a server to query, I want to find out which of the 4 returns the query. If it's a cached reply, does it mean I won't see it? At the end of your dig reply you will see the following.. ;; Query time: 26 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) ;; WHEN: Wed Jul 9 10:49:40 2008 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 297 That tells you which server answered the query. HTH Hi Brain I think you have missed a reply on this topic :) That's the ISP's DNS server you see there. dig +trace domain is what I needed -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Web: http://www.SoftDux.com Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stuff ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NOW: Firefox 3.0 and GNOME crash when trying to view SME Server documentation WAS: OT: anything in CentOS 5.2 that uses opendns.com when browsing web?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip OK, I can verify that for me (CentOS-5.2 updated, Firefox-3.0-2.el5.centos) this link: http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:Administration_Manual:Booklet Causes X to crash. I can replicate it every time I try with Firefox under CentOS 5, but it works fine with Konqueror. An EeePC and a laptop running Ubuntu don't have any problems accessing this page with Firefox. snip These are the relevant log entries (I think) Jul 8 21:17:06 dell2400 gconfd (lanny-3906): Received signal 15, shutting down cleanly Jul 8 21:17:06 dell2400 gconfd (lanny-3906): Exiting Can some on with RHEL-5.2 try that link and see if it causes a similar issue in RHEL-5? Johnny: Thank you for duplicating this issue! After you determine whether or not it is also an Upstream issue, you will be able to describe it, better than I can, in Bugzilla. Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] can I use CentOS as a antivirus / spam filter / HTTP AV gateway?
Hi all I've been thinking about using CentOS on a Dell R200 server and turn it into a firewall / network monitor / traffic shaper in our datacentre, instead of using a dedicated firewall device. One of the devices that I have been looking at, with my limited budget, is the D-Link DFL 860 - http://www.netdefend.eu/Product.aspx?m=15ref=DFL-860 It provides AV, SPI, VPN, DOS, P2P, etc protection. Most of this can be done with Linux as well, but I'm not 100% sure about the AV part. How will I use / setup CentOS to check all traffic coming in out (HTTP, SMTP, POP3, IMAP, etc) for virusses and clean them? We host both Windows Linux servers, and I'm not too worried about the Linux servers, but Windows needs a lot of extra protection. -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Web: http://www.SoftDux.com Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stuff ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] can I use CentOS as a antivirus / spam filter / HTTP AV gateway?
Dear Rudi, what software do you think using to do that operations? Best Regards, --- Eduardo Silvestre nfsi telecom, lda. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. (+351) 21 949 2300 - Fax (+351) 21 949 2301 http://www.nfsi.pt/ - Original Message - From: Rudi Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2008 4:23:59 PM GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: [CentOS] can I use CentOS as a antivirus / spam filter / HTTP AV gateway? Hi all I've been thinking about using CentOS on a Dell R200 server and turn it into a firewall / network monitor / traffic shaper in our datacentre, instead of using a dedicated firewall device. One of the devices that I have been looking at, with my limited budget, is the D-Link DFL 860 - http://www.netdefend.eu/Product.aspx?m=15ref=DFL-860 It provides AV, SPI, VPN, DOS, P2P, etc protection. Most of this can be done with Linux as well, but I'm not 100% sure about the AV part. How will I use / setup CentOS to check all traffic coming in out (HTTP, SMTP, POP3, IMAP, etc) for virusses and clean them? We host both Windows Linux servers, and I'm not too worried about the Linux servers, but Windows needs a lot of extra protection. -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Web: http://www.SoftDux.com Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stuff ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: anything in CentOS 5.2 that uses opendns.com when browsing web?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 4:03 AM, Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/7/9 Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I believe this is completely OT, but I want to be positive. I have a fully up to date CentOS 5.2 box. During the past week, when surfing with Firefox (and today, while testing with Konqueror), frequently, especially when DNS is slow, I am seeing references to opendns.com At times, I end up on opendns.com web pages, instead of at the web site I'm trying to get to. My ISP, the phone company, claims this is not coming from their end and that they are not using opendns.com. I was told they have two (2) DNS servers. I haven't changed anything in my IPCop Firewall/Router box and my belief is that this is coming from my ISP or upstream from there. . If using opendns.com is something new in CentOS 5.2, please let me know. TIA. Could it be that some server you connect to uses opendns' servers for their own DNS service? Which web sites are you trying to surf to when you reach OpenDNS? Amos: This is an intermittent problem and I believe it began one week ago. The first time it happened, I was trying to connect to a Secure (https) web site at irs.gov and I got a warning message from Firefox that the SSL certificate belonged to opendns.com which was very troubling That is the first time I called my ISP about opendns.com I have also seen references to opendns.com while trying to connect to other web sites. I suspect that my ISP (the phone company) is using opendns.com but the Supervisor in support that I spoke with does not think that is true. Of course, she is not the Network person in charge of their 2 DNS servers, so she may be unaware of what happens upstream. Since then, when the DNS is slow, I have seen references to opendns.com at the lower left hand corner of Firefox, where it shows what sites it is trying to connect to, transferring from, etc. For example, yesterday, in that area, I saw guide.opendns.com Waiting for reply I am beginning to look into the idea of having my own Caching DNS Server, as was suggested in this thread last night. I took a *very* quick look at IPCop (which is my current Firewall/Router box) and I think it has provisions for Dynamic DNS built in, but not Caching DNS. I also took a very quick look at the SME Server documentation, which I was able to get last night after I switched to KDE and I think it also has provisions for Dynamic DNS but not DNS Caching. When I have more time available, I will read more about dnscache part of djbdns, which was suggested earlier in this thread, as an option to BIND. Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sudoers
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Mário Gamito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I do. On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Tharun Kumar Allu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Mário Gamito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I need to run /bin/mount and /sbin/mount.cifs commands as nobody user (it has (bin/bash shell). So, I've edited /etc/sudoers and added: Cmnd_AliasCMD_MOUNT = /bin/mount Cmnd_AliasCMD_CIFS ) = /sbin/mount.cifs nobody ALL = NOPASSWD: CMD_MOUNT nobody ALL = NOPASSWD: CMD_CIFS But when I run the command as nobody (in the shell), I get the error: mount error 1 = Operation not permitted Any ideas ? Any help would be appreciated. Warm Regards, Mário Gamito May be it is a stupid question but did you execute the command with sudo in logged in as user nobody [EMAIL PROTECTED] sudo /bin/mount[.cifs] Another stupid question are you editing /etc/sudoers using visudo? normally located at /usr/sbin/visudo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Bind update overwrites named.conf
I just had a customer's bind server lose all of it's local DNS records. Yum updated the bind packages this morning at ~6am, and replaced the original /etc/named.conf file, saving the old as named.conf.rpmsave. This seems like the opposite of what it should have done (i.e. save the new file as named.conf.rpmnew). There does not appear to be any difference between the originally shipped conf file and the new one, suggesting that the file should not have been replaced at all. Just wanted to through this out there in hopes it helps someone else before the phone starts ringing... CentOS release 4.6 (Final) Jul 09 05:59:25 Updated: bind-devel.i386 20:9.2.4-28.0.1.el4 Jul 09 05:59:29 Updated: bind-chroot.i386 20:9.2.4-28.0.1.el4 Chris ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Need basic PPPoE startup help
I need basic PPPoE startup help.
adsl-start DID bring up my PPPoE link (ppp0) to my ISP over eth0 via the
DSL modem/bridge. My IPv4 CIDR block is routing and Shorewall is doing
the firewalling.
But shorewall has to be started after ppp0 is up and working. For now
this means running shorewall restart (or start?). Shorewall 4.2 will
have a way to restart shorewall without recompiling, I learned on the
their list.
In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ppp0 I have:
BOOTPROTO=dialup
NAME=DSLppp0
DEVICE=ppp0
TYPE=xDSL
ONBOOT=no
Should ONBOOT be changed to yes, or is there some startup script that I
should add the
/sbin/adsl-start ppp0
command line followed with the shorewall restart command?
I am away at IEEE 802 plenary meeting next week, and I need this to be
automated in case of system glitches.
Also sometimes the Speedstream just stops forwarding datagrams.
Supposedly if it overheats. This requires a power recycle for the
speedstream (and my ISP will not use anything else for the modem
services). I suspect this will glich the PPPoE connection as well, so I
will need some sort of watchdog and a restart of ppp0 and Shorewall.
Attached is a rather large script of a user that I picked up on the
Shorewall list for some Linux distro. I am NOT a script reader, let
alone writer. Should I use this (how would I modify it for Centos and a
ppp0 interface) and where would I place it to run as needed?
===
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
#THIS SCRIPT CREATED BY EJM (alias Erik Mundall) IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN A
CONSTANT CONNECTION WITH THE TWO
#PPPOE ADSL LINES WHICH HAVE PROVEN TO BE UNRELIABLE/UNSTABLE. 15 APRIL
2008
#
#THIS PROGRAM NEEDS TO FOLLOW THE FOLLOWING ROUTINE IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN
CONNECTIVITY OF THE TWO PPPOE LINES
#AND TO SHARE THE INTERNET LOAD ACROSS THOSE AND ACROSS THE STATIC LINE
#
#THE STATIC SHOULD NEVER FAIL. THIS SCRIPT IS INTENDED TO ADDRESS ONLY
THE INSTABILITY OF THE TWO PPPOE
#LINES, AND WILL DO NOTHING FOR THE STATIC LINE IF IT SHOULD FAIL.
#
#
#STEP ONE:THE PROGRAM SHOULD IDENTIFY THE LINE(S) THAT ARE DOWN, IF
ANY, AND ISOLATE THEM.
#STEP TWO:THE PROGRAM SHOULD RECONFIGURE AND RESTART SHOREWALL TO
MATCH THE LINES THAT ARE UP.
#STEP THREE:THE PROGRAM SHOULD FOCUS ON RESTORING THE DROPPED PPPOE
LINE(S).
#STEP FOUR:THE PROGRAM MUST REPEAT STEP TWO ONCE STEP THREE HAS
SUCCEEDED.
###
# REQUIRED VARIABLES. THESE MUST BE SET PROPERLY!!!
our $admin_email [EMAIL PROTECTED];
our $domain_name = your_domain_name.com;
our $GATEWAY_1 = 'x.x.x.x'; #GATEWAY OF PPP0 LINE
our $GATEWAY_2 = 'x.x.x.x'; #GATEWAY OF PPP1 LINE
our $IPADDRESS_1 = 'x.x.x.x'; #STATIC IP ADDRESS OF PPP0 LINE (ASSIGNED
BY ISP)
our $IPADDRESS_2 = 'x.x.x.x'; #STATIC IP ADDRESS OF PPP1 LINE (ASSIGNED
BY ISP)
our $DEBUG=1; #SET THIS TO 1 FOR DEBUGGING, 0 TO TURN DEBUGGING OFF
our $DEBFILE='/var/log/ppp/debug.log'; #THE /var/log/ppp DIRECTORY MUST
EXIST FOR THE DEBUG FILE
our $logfile='/var/log/ppp/maint.log'; #THE /var/log/ppp DIRECTORY MUST
EXIST FOR LOGGING.
###
# BELOW THIS LINE, NOTHING MORE SHOULD NEED TO BE CONFIGURED.
our @ifconf = ();
our @iprout = `/sbin/ip route`;
our $p1;
our $p2;
our $ppp0=0;
our $ppp1=0;
our $FAILED='FALSE';
our $FAIL='TRUE';
our $attempt=0;
our $date='';
our @data=();
our @updata=();
our @log=();
our @total_log=();
our $cur_day=0;
our $cur_month=0;
our $cur_year=0;
our $late_day=0;
our $late_month=0;
our $late_year=0;
our
%months=(Jan,1,Feb,2,Mar,3,Apr,4,May,5,Jun,6,Jul,7,Aug,8,Sep,9,Oct,10,Nov,11,Dec,12);
our $start_time=`/bin/date`;
our $stop_time;
#
### SAFEGUARD AGAINST MULTIPLE PROCESSES! ###
#
our @pslist = `/bin/ps auxw`;
our $line='';
our $scripts=0;
foreach $line(@pslist) {
if ($line=~s/(ppp-line-maintenance\.pl)/$1/) { #THIS SCRIPT MUST
NOT BE RENAMED, OR IF IT IS, THIS LINE MUST BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY
$scripts++;
if ($DEBUG==1) {print Line:$line\nScripts:$scripts\n };
};
};
if ($scripts=2) { #CONTINUE THIS SCRIPT IF ONLY ONE OCCURRENCE (THIS
ONE) OF THIS SCRIPT IN CURRENT PROCESS LIST
#
### BEGIN ###
#
if ($DEBUG==1) {open DLOG, $DEBFILE or die Cannot open debugging
file!\n};
ping1;
ping2;
checkdowned;
trimlog;
if ($DEBUG==1) {close DLOG};
} #END 'CONTINUE SCRIPT'
sleep 2;
exit;
##
### SUBROUTINES ###
###
sub ping1 {
$p1=`/bin/ping -c 3 $GATEWAY_1`;
if ($p1=~s/100\%\spacket\sloss//) {$p1='DOWN'};
if ($p1=~s/unreachable//) {$p1='DOWN'};
if ($DEBUG==1) {print DLOG p1:$p1\n};
return $p1;
};
sub ping2 {
$p2=`/bin/ping -c 3 $GATEWAY_2`;
if ($p2=~s/100\%\spacket\sloss//) {$p2='DOWN'};
if
Re: [CentOS] Bind update overwrites named.conf
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:42:12AM -0700, Chris Miller wrote: I just had a customer's bind server lose all of it's local DNS records. Yum updated the bind packages this morning at ~6am, and replaced the original /etc/named.conf file, saving the old as named.conf.rpmsave. This seems like the opposite of what it should have done (i.e. save the new file as named.conf.rpmnew). If you have the caching-nameserver package, it's the expected behaviour: /etc/named.conf is owned and labelled as config file for caching-nameserver. The regular bind/bind-chroot don't provide named.conf. You should not install the caching-nameserver package if you are indeed providing DNS services with bind... Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpWw0B7zuoFY.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Flaky desktop audio behavior.
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 09:13 -0700, nate wrote: William L. Maltby wrote: I feel it might be related to Jim's problem. I feel it might be a bug. Can anybody reproduce? I think the T'bird step is coincidental. I think any sound played as another user should reproduce it. Hmmm ... I might be assuming to much if I assume another user is significant. I don't see why the desktop owner would be the only one that can play a sound. But in any case have you checked to see if the sound device is locked by another process? When I have sound issues I usually run lsof | grep /dev/dsp to see what, if anything is using the sound card That returned nothing. So I ran it w/o the dsp and manually extracted anything interesting. Got just these, which look normal. mixer_app 10922 hardtolove2u CHR1,3 1604 /dev/null escd 10926 hardtolove0r CHR1,3 1604 /dev/null A ps yielded (501 = hardtolove) the below. The user that ran the T'bird, which trumpeted mail arrival, was 502. 501 10906 1 0 07:35 ? 00:00:00 gnome-volume-manager --sm-client -id default5 501 10922 1 0 07:35 ? 00:00:00 /usr/libexec/mixer_applet2 --oaf -activate-iid=OAFIID:GNOME_MixerApplet_Factory --oaf-ior-fd=20 501 10926 1 0 07:35 ? 00:00:00 ./escd --key_Inserted=/usr/bin/ esc --on_Signal=/usr/bin/esc Again, looking normal to me. That is *if* they should still be active, which I assume is the case. Looking to reduce the scope of investigation (or conversely expand it beyond 5.2 a tad) I had booted this session with the previous (5.1) kernel. And experienced the same problem. So it seems to not be 5.2 kernel related. This would seem to indicate that it is X/Gnome related across 5.1 and 5.2 versions of libraries/applications. A diff of the /proc/asound/ file contents from a previous normal situation with the contents after this problem was replicated shows only the kernel for significant differences. 432c432 Kernel: Linux centos501.homegroannetworking 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jun 25 13:49:24 EDT 2008 i686 --- Kernel: Linux centos501.homegroannetworking 2.6.18-92.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Sat Jun 21 19:04:27 EDT 2008 i686 Slowly continuing investigation as opportunities arise... and kill it. To me it sounds like thunderbird from the other user is accessing the sound card directly, perhaps preventing other apps from accessing it. Some desktop setups include a sound daemon like esd or Clarification: the other user is me on the desktop, su'd to another user in gnome-terminal and nohup thunderbird. Since *real* id, as opposed to *effective* id, may have effect here, I though I should mention it. Having done programming in many languages over an extended time, and having seen the general level of competence and attention to detail (the old 80/20 rule seem to apply), I don't trust them to do it right all that consistently. karts(?), to facilitate multiple things accessing the sound card simultaneously, but I'm not sure what their capabilities/limitations are as I rarely if ever use them. nate snip sig stuff -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] sudoers
Sorry for this accidental reply. But I might as well take this opportunity to add to the thread. First, look at the unneeded closing parenthesis in the CMD_CIFS alias. Second, have you tried 'sudo -l' as nobody to see the available list of commands that this user is entitled to run with sudo? MAL From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc-Andre Levesque Sent: July 9, 2008 11:54 To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: RE: [CentOS] sudoers From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tharun Kumar Allu Sent: July 9, 2008 11:36 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] sudoers On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Mário Gamito [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I do. On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Tharun Kumar Allu [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Mário Gamito [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I need to run /bin/mount and /sbin/mount.cifs commands as nobody user (it has (bin/bash shell). So, I've edited /etc/sudoers and added: Cmnd_AliasCMD_MOUNT = /bin/mount Cmnd_AliasCMD_CIFS ) = /sbin/mount.cifs nobody ALL = NOPASSWD: CMD_MOUNT nobody ALL = NOPASSWD: CMD_CIFS But when I run the command as nobody (in the shell), I get the error: mount error 1 = Operation not permitted Any ideas ? Any help would be appreciated. Warm Regards, Mário Gamito May be it is a stupid question but did you execute the command with sudo in logged in as user nobody [EMAIL PROTECTED] sudo /bin/mount[.cifs] Another stupid question are you editing /etc/sudoers using visudo? normally located at /usr/sbin/visudo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] can I use CentOS as a antivirus / spam filter / HTTP AV gateway?
Rudi Ahlers wrote: Hi all I've been thinking about using CentOS on a Dell R200 server and turn it into a firewall / network monitor / traffic shaper in our datacentre, instead of using a dedicated firewall device. One of the devices that I have been looking at, with my limited budget, is the D-Link DFL 860 - http://www.netdefend.eu/Product.aspx?m=15ref=DFL-860 It provides AV, SPI, VPN, DOS, P2P, etc protection. Most of this can be done with Linux as well, but I'm not 100% sure about the AV part. How will I use / setup CentOS to check all traffic coming in out (HTTP, SMTP, POP3, IMAP, etc) for virusses and clean them? We host both Windows Linux servers, and I'm not too worried about the Linux servers, but Windows needs a lot of extra protection. well, pop/imap shouldn't need any virus scanning, that would be handled at the SMTP transfer layer, by something like MailScanner + ClamAV (I've used this combination), or spamassassin+clamav, and others. http virus scanning can be done by using Squid as a transparent web proxy agent and squid plugins. I've never attempted this myself, so I can't give you the exact recipe. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Need help with awk one-liner
This awk command pulls URLs from an apache config file, where $x is
the config filename.
awk '/:8008\/root/ {printf $3 \t}' $x
The URL that is output by the script looks something like this:
ajpv12://hostname.network.company.com:8008/root
Is there a way to alter the output so it only shows hostname by
itself? Do I need to pipe this through awk again to clean it up?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Need help with awk one-liner
Sean Carolan wrote:
This awk command pulls URLs from an apache config file, where $x is
the config filename.
awk '/:8008\/root/ {printf $3 \t}' $x
The URL that is output by the script looks something like this:
ajpv12://hostname.network.company.com:8008/root
Is there a way to alter the output so it only shows hostname by
itself? Do I need to pipe this through awk again to clean it up?
awk '/:8008\/root/ {printf $3 \t}' $x | sed 's/.*\/\(.*\):.*/\1/'
-Ross
__
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[solved]Re: [CentOS] How to Auto Add forward slash / when accessing a link/url through ProxyPass
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 8:21 PM, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ankush grover wrote:
I have the below lines added in httpd.conf file
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} /testdiary
RewriteRule /testdiary(.)$ /testdiary/
ProxyPass /testdiary http://testdiary.example.com/
ProxyPassReverse /testdiary http://testdiary.example.com/
This is what I do on my systems
RedirectMatch /testdiary$ http://mysite.example.com/testdiary/
nate
Hi
Using RedirectMatch /testdiary$ /testdiary/ fixed the problem
Thanks everyone.
Regards
Ankush
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need help with awk one-liner
The URL that is output by the script looks something like this:
ajpv12://hostname.network.company.com:8008/root
Is there a way to alter the output so it only shows hostname by
itself? Do I need to pipe this through awk again to clean it up?
awk '/:8008\/root/ {printf $3 \t}' $x | sed 's/.*\/\(.*\):.*/\1/'
That worked well. If I have three matches from the awk command, how
would you alter this so sed will output all three hostnames?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need help with awk one-liner
The awk output that was piped into to the sed command looks like this: ajpv12://host1.domain.company.com:8008/root ajpv12://host2.domain.company.com:8008/root ajpv12://host3.domain.company.com:8008/root ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need help with awk one-liner
those are supposed to be tab-separated urls, all on one line. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Flaky desktop audio behavior.
William L. Maltby wrote: That returned nothing. So I ran it w/o the dsp and manually extracted anything interesting. Got just these, which look normal. How about lsof | grep /dev/snd I'm used to using OSS, which usually means /dev/dsp, it seems that ALSA uses /dev/snd(or maybe another device..). I had a similar issue last night where the flash plugin in firefox prevented Cedega from being able to spit out sound and found it was using a device in /dev/snd, once I stopped the flash plugin I got sound back(and even with the sound device in use, XMMS was able to play sound no problem and it is configured to use ALSA, as is Cedega). Worst case just run lsof | grep /dev that's how I found the issue last night, I wasn't sure what /dev device was in use. mixer_app 10922 hardtolove2u CHR1,3 1604 /dev/null escd 10926 hardtolove0r CHR1,3 1604 /dev/null These reference /dev/null which isn't related. nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NOW: Firefox 3.0 and GNOME crash when trying to view SME Server documentation WAS: OT: anything in CentOS 5.2 that uses opendns.com when browsing web?
This issue also exists on my Fedora Core 8 laptop running the .tgz binaries from mozilla. -Ben On Wednesday 09 July 2008, Lanny Marcus wrote: On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip OK, I can verify that for me (CentOS-5.2 updated, Firefox-3.0-2.el5.centos) this link: http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:Administration_Manual:Booklet Causes X to crash. I can replicate it every time I try with Firefox under CentOS 5, but it works fine with Konqueror. An EeePC and a laptop running Ubuntu don't have any problems accessing this page with Firefox. snip These are the relevant log entries (I think) Jul 8 21:17:06 dell2400 gconfd (lanny-3906): Received signal 15, shutting down cleanly Jul 8 21:17:06 dell2400 gconfd (lanny-3906): Exiting Can some on with RHEL-5.2 try that link and see if it causes a similar issue in RHEL-5? Johnny: Thank you for duplicating this issue! After you determine whether or not it is also an Upstream issue, you will be able to describe it, better than I can, in Bugzilla. Lanny -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- -- Only those who reach toward a goal are likely to achieve it. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Need help with awk one-liner
Sean Carolan wrote:
those are supposed to be tab-separated urls, all on one line.
If 'ajpv12://' and ':8008/root' are always going to be the same:
awk '/:8008\/root/ {printf $3 \t}' $x | sed 's/ajpv12:\/\///g' | sed
's/:8008\/root//g'
If these change then your going to need either a more complex awk,
or more complex sed expression.
-Ross
__
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Evolution in CentOS 5.2
(Probably OT) Has anyone else noticed these flaky (new?) behaviors in Evo since the 5.2 upgrade: - REALLY slow saving messages from inbox to another folder - search capability separated by folder instead of overall (with no option for control) - failure to autocomplete email addresses for known contacts I think that's it. I was wondering if it was just me, or if others had noticed this. (If it's just me, there is no need to reply) Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UTF-8 support in PCRE
The issue is in CentOS 5. I ran the application successfully in Ubuntu 8.04. PCRE in CentOS does not have unicode properties enabled. Please see pcretest -C outputs from CentOS and Ubuntu CentOS 5 === [EMAIL PROTECTED] pcretest -C PCRE version 6.6 06-Feb-2006 Compiled with UTF-8 support No Unicode properties support Newline character is LF Internal link size = 2 POSIX malloc threshold = 10 Default match limit = 1000 Default recursion depth limit = 1000 Match recursion uses stack Ubuntu = [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pcretest -C PCRE version 7.4 2007-09-21 Compiled with UTF-8 support Unicode properties support Newline sequence is LF \R matches all Unicode newlines Internal link size = 2 POSIX malloc threshold = 10 Default match limit = 1000 Default recursion depth limit = 1000 Match recursion uses stack Is there a way to enable these options (without the usual ./configure make)? -Amitava On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Amitava Shee wrote: Yes, building from source will work. I just want to know if there is a package (in some yum repository) somewhere so that updates, patches etc. gets applied with yum update. It would be nice to do something like yum install pcre-utf8 Again - and I'm going to type this very slowly: The supplied pcre which is *IN* CentOS *IS* built with UTF-8 support. And: Your problem has *nothing* to do with pcre, your problem lies *within* the iconv library. Ralph ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need help with awk one-liner
If 'ajpv12://' and ':8008/root' are always going to be the same:
awk '/:8008\/root/ {printf $3 \t}' $x | sed 's/ajpv12:\/\///g' | sed
's/:8008\/root//g'
If these change then your going to need either a more complex awk,
or more complex sed expression.
-Ross
Marvelous. Thanks for taking the time to help me Ross. This is going
to be extremely helpful.
Sean
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Does sprof work on CentOS5?
No matter how I try, I can't seem to get a library profile from sprof on CentOS5. Does anyone know if sprof actually works on CentOS5? I'd be very interested to hear if anyone is using it successfully. At the moment I'm trying something like this to get the dump: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. LD_PROFILE=libmy.so ./mymain where libmy.so is the library I want to profile, and mymain is the executable which links to it. This appears to create the profile dump successfully (which appears at /var/tmp/libmy.so.profile), but when I try to get a readable profile using sprof it fails: $ sprof libmy.so /var/tmp/libmy.so.profile sprof: failed to load shared object `libmy.so' I have a CentOS4 machine here, and doing the above on that works fine, but I've had no luck at all on CentOS5 (all currently up-to-date). Can anyone help? (Please!) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Flaky desktop audio behavior.
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 10:17 -0700, nate wrote: William L. Maltby wrote: That returned nothing. So I ran it w/o the dsp and manually extracted anything interesting. Got just these, which look normal. How about lsof | grep /dev/snd In my visual, I was on the lookout for that (or any variation). BJIC, It returned nothing also. I'm used to using OSS, which usually means /dev/dsp, it seems that ALSA uses /dev/snd(or maybe another device..). I had a similar issue last night where the flash plugin in firefox prevented Cedega from being able to spit out sound and found it was using a device in /dev/snd, once I stopped the flash plugin I got sound back(and even with the sound device in use, XMMS was able to play sound no problem and it is configured to use ALSA, as is Cedega). I'll see if I can ID a plugin in the next pass. Worst case just run lsof | grep /dev that's how I found the issue last night, I wasn't sure what /dev device was in use. That's how I found the below. mixer_app 10922 hardtolove2u CHR1,3 1604 /dev/null escd 10926 hardtolove0r CHR1,3 1604 /dev/null These reference /dev/null which isn't related. I ignored the dev/null bit because I just wanted to see anything that might be sound related that was running. snip sig stuff -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Flaky desktop audio behavior.
William L. Maltby wrote: I'll see if I can ID a plugin in the next pass. The plugins themselves won't show up, in my case it just said firefox was using it. And I recall getting audio from flash earlier in the day so thought it still might be using it, and I happened to be right, after disabling the plugin the lock on the device was released. Since nothing is using the sound device, I'm not sure what else to check, short of permissions, at one point a few years ago it wasn't uncommon for the permissions of devices such as sound devices etc to get automatically changed to the person logged in. Not sure what caused it or why, or if anything still does it anymore. But if your user doesn't have access to the device I would think similar behavior would occur. So, check permissions on /dev/snd/* and /dev/dsp, another thing I do to test is run a command line program that generates a sound(I use mpg123 out of habbit which plays mp3 files), and see if you notice any permission denied type errors. nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] hard drive info
i'm acessing a centos box via ssh, is there any way that i can find out the hard drive info, such IDE/SATA, format, size, make model, etc...? thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Flaky desktop audio behavior.
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 11:25 -0700, nate wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
I'll see if I can ID a plugin in the next pass.
The plugins themselves won't show up, in my case it just said firefox
was using it. And I recall getting audio from flash earlier in the
day so thought it still might be using it, and I happened to be right,
after disabling the plugin the lock on the device was released.
Since nothing is using the sound device, I'm not sure what else to
check, short of permissions, at one point a few years ago it wasn't
uncommon for the permissions of devices such as sound devices etc
to get automatically changed to the person logged in. Not sure what
caused it or why, or if anything still does it anymore. But if your
user doesn't have access to the device I would think similar behavior
would occur.
Well, that was involved partly. The other user owned all the
devices /dev/{gpmctl,mixer,audio,adsp,snd} *and* floppies, HD,
nvidia, ...
So I ran
find /dev -user bill -exec chown hardtolove {} \;
which I really shouldn't (I know better). But that did provide a small
gain.
I can now open the Volume Control Panel (for a lurking friend, that is
VCP ;-)
I still can't open the volume slider that drops down from the little
speaker icon. So something is better, something still not fixed.
So, check permissions on /dev/snd/* and /dev/dsp, another thing I do
to test is run a command line program that generates a sound(I
use mpg123 out of habbit which plays mp3 files), and see if you
notice any permission denied type errors.
Will do. Signing off to find out where I can get mpg123. I think I'll
pop a CD in again first and see what I can doo-dah, doo-dah with that.
BRB
nate
snip sig stuff
Thanks for following up!
--
Bill
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hard drive info
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 at 12:18pm, Hiep Nguyen wrote i'm acessing a centos box via ssh, is there any way that i can find out the hard drive info, such IDE/SATA, format, size, make model, etc...? dmesg df man smartctl -- Joshua Baker-LePain QB3 Shared Cluster Sysadmin UCSF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 kernel [2.6.18-92.1.1.el5] crashes on dual-PIII Compaq ProLiant 3000
2008/6/26 Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: We have created a new test kernel that has an upstream patch to fix this issue, please test this and see if it fixes your issues: http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/kernel/5/bz443853/ So this is for those who already have a booting Centos. Is there a work-around for those trying to install on a Powernow system with a 5.2 media? Or do they have to have to revert to trying a 5.1 media? -Mauriat ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hard drive info
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Hiep Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i'm acessing a centos box via ssh, is there any way that i can find out the hard drive info, such IDE/SATA, format, size, make model, etc...? dmesg | grep Model -- Jeff ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] hard drive info
i'm acessing a centos box via ssh, is there any way that i can find out the hard drive info, such IDE/SATA, format, size, make model, etc...? Cat something from /sys such as #cat /sys/block/sda/size x #cat /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:10.0/host0/target0:0:0/0:0:0:0/model 0/model Virtual disk jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: pm-utils - ATrpms updates a system package on the stable branch [FIXED]
On 7/7/2008 4:28 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 04:20:30PM -0600, Kenneth Burgener wrote: I am not worried about what is did to my system, as this is a minor package. What I am more interested in is if this is a bug that needs to be reported? Yes, as said the package owners are *supposed* to know how to structure the repo. ;) But consider it reported, it has already been fixed (try yum update against the master, or wait for the mirrors to catch up). Thanks! Axel, Thank you for the quick turn around fixing this minor bug. I see that the pm-utils-0.99.3-6.el5.1cubbi_suspend2.i386.rpm package has been moved from /stable/ to /testing/. I just wanted to say that ATrpms is an awesome and very well maintained repository which I use for all my MythTV needs. I rarely if ever run into problems with this repository. Thank you again. Kenneth ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Flaky desktop audio behavior.
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 15:20 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 11:25 -0700, nate wrote:
snip
Well, that was involved partly. The other user owned all the
devices /dev/{gpmctl,mixer,audio,adsp,snd} *and* floppies, HD,
nvidia, ...
So I ran
find /dev -user bill -exec chown hardtolove {} \;
which I really shouldn't (I know better). But that did provide a small
gain.
I can now open the Volume Control Panel (for a lurking friend, that is
VCP ;-)
I still can't open the volume slider that drops down from the little
speaker icon. So something is better, something still not fixed.
So, check permissions on /dev/snd/* and /dev/dsp, another thing I do
to test is run a command line program that generates a sound(I
use mpg123 out of habbit which plays mp3 files), and see if you
notice any permission denied type errors.
Will do. Signing off to find out where I can get mpg123. I think I'll
pop a CD in again first and see what I can doo-dah, doo-dah with that.
BRB
Ah! Music to my ears!
CD is playing alright. Volume Control Panel mute, volume, balance all
work. In *my* original thread (not the one from ech - Jim?), I couldn't
even open the Volume Cont... crap that's too long - VCP ;-) (you know
who you are!)
So, I suspect we have achieved bug nirvana. ISTM that the problem is
isolated to Gnome or it's interface to the system *or* a failure in some
OS component.
1) Gave (properly?) ownership of the devices to a user other than the
desktop owner (NB: *if* it is legal for a user other than desktop owner
to use the facilities because the user is in the desktop, being
invoked from a Gnome terminal, then the device ownership should be given
to the user of the device, just as with tty devices).
2) When the using application(s) are terminated, the devices ownership
should be returned to root, as with tty devices, or back to the desktop
user (if that user ever owned them *before* the devices were used -
which they weren't in this case) allowing later allocation to another
user again and making them also available for the desktop user.
3) When ownership of the devices were manually changed to root owner,
*part* of the desktop facilities began operating normally.
4) Only part not working now is the volume control application out of
the speaker icon on my panel.
5) As you suspected, lookie here!
# cd ~hardtolove;find . -user bill -ls
16646219 7948 -rwxr-xr-x 1 bill bill 8119784 Nov 20
2007 ./firefox/plugins/libflashplayer.so
166462188 -rw-r--r-- 1 bill bill 856 Dec 15
2006 ./firefox/plugins/flashplayer.xpt
The Q now is will changing ownership of these affect the volume
slider? Shouldn't? First one is an LSB shared object, second one is
data.
Anyway, with your (and all the others too) help, we have a reproducible
situation and some clues.
Before I write a bug report (after seeing that one doesn't exist),
anything else you think I could look for or try?
nate
snip sig stuff
Thanks again,
--
Bill
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS Patch for http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113
It has already been released: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2008-July/015083.html On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Sean Carolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will there be a BIND patch available for this vulnerability, for CentOS 3.9? http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- William Hooper ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS Patch for http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113
Sean Carolan wrote: Will there be a BIND patch available for this vulnerability, for CentOS 3.9? http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113 for that matter, how do I figure out what version(s) of Bind for CentOS 4 or 5 include fixes for this? I'm getting a little lost poking around the forums and KB and RHEL's own website is being remarkably obtuse for me today. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS Patch for http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 4:08 PM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sean Carolan wrote: Will there be a BIND patch available for this vulnerability, for CentOS 3.9? http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113 for that matter, how do I figure out what version(s) of Bind for CentOS 4 or 5 include fixes for this? I'm getting a little lost poking around the forums and KB and RHEL's own website is being remarkably obtuse for me today. Here is the link to the RHEL advisory (copied from the CentOS announce list) https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0533.html -- William Hooper ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Flaky desktop audio behavior.
William L. Maltby wrote: CD is playing alright. Volume Control Panel mute, volume, balance all work. In *my* original thread (not the one from ech - Jim?), I couldn't even open the Volume Cont... crap that's too long - VCP ;-) (you know who you are!) I'm not sure it's a bug though, it may be a feature(tm) (the changing of permissions on devices). I don't think it should work that way. I checked my Debian Etch desktop at home for any devices that were owned by my userid and the only ones that came up were terminal devices(/dev/pts/ stuff), which is normal if your logged in. It appears Debian hasn't adopted the stuff that changes the ownership of /dev devices and instead relies upon group access rights(what I think is the right way to do it). So any user in the audio group for example has a right to play audio. I don't have any RHEL or CentOS desktops, I have a Fedora 8 desktop in VMWare ESX but it doesn't appear to provide a virtual sound device so I can't check anything there either. My servers get a minimal version of gnome, not enough to login to a desktop with but enough to run some gnome or gtk related apps over a SSH tunnel. 2) When the using application(s) are terminated, the devices ownership should be returned to root, as with tty devices, or back to the desktop user (if that user ever owned them *before* the devices were used - which they weren't in this case) allowing later allocation to another user again and making them also available for the desktop user. While this may be possible I can imagine the logic getting confusing if there are multiple people that are logged in. The Q now is will changing ownership of these affect the volume slider? Shouldn't? First one is an LSB shared object, second one is data. No neither of these should impact volume. What impacts volumes with regards to flash is if the plugin is actually loaded(which requires going to a page that has a flash object), and actually plays some audio. Before that happens nothing with the audio subsystem is touched as far as I know.. Before I write a bug report (after seeing that one doesn't exist), anything else you think I could look for or try? Not off the top of my head.. I guess last words would be don't be surprised if it doesn't get fixed(short of getting off the scheme of changing ownership of dev devices entirely for things like audio), which I don't think(hope) would happen until a major OS rev is issued. nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: anything in CentOS 5.2 that uses opendns.com when browsing web?
Pfsense could do the job also, if you install tinyDNS and increase the cache limit which is 1Mb by default to perhaps 100mb. I'm giving a try right now because my ISP here in mexico city is so damn slow to resolve domains outside the america continent. cheers. -- It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion. Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente servidas ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Flaky desktop audio behavior.
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 13:32 -0700, nate wrote: William L. Maltby wrote: CD is playing alright. Volume Control Panel mute, volume, balance all work. In *my* original thread (not the one from ech - Jim?), I couldn't even open the Volume Cont... crap that's too long - VCP ;-) (you know who you are!) I'm not sure it's a bug though, it may be a feature(tm) (the changing of permissions on devices). I don't think it should work that way. I'll forgo my tendency to start a philosophical discussion about that. I'll just say that whatever method is chosen, I don't think correct behavior locks out the desktop user when the other current user (especially when that user was instantiated from the same desktop, implying that the *ending* ownership should be at least such that it allows the original gnome user access to the facilities) is finished with the device(s). ISTM it is either a design flaw or an implementation flaw. For an example of correct behavior, just think of ttys where multiple users can use the same device at different times. When a user logs on, ownership is given to that user. When the user logs out, ownership is returned to root. System resources are *ultimately* managed by the system. I checked my Debian Etch desktop at home for any devices that were owned by my userid and the only ones that came up were terminal devices(/dev/pts/ stuff), which is normal if your logged in. It appears Debian hasn't adopted the stuff that changes the ownership of /dev devices and instead relies upon group access rights(what I think is the right way to do it). So any user in the audio group for example has a right to play audio. I don't have any RHEL or CentOS desktops, I have a Fedora 8 desktop in VMWare ESX but it doesn't appear to provide a virtual sound device so I can't check anything there either. My servers get a minimal version of gnome, not enough to login to a desktop with but enough to run some gnome or gtk related apps over a SSH tunnel. Sharing via group access rights is OK too. But it is not appropriate for all devices or even some uses. Think of 3 users printing to a non-spooled printer simultaneously. Or writing a CD/DVD. Regardless, when one user of the group accessible device is finished, subsequent users are not locked out. So even this scenario supports buginess of the RHEL/CentOS situation. 2) When the using application(s) are terminated, the devices ownership should be returned to root, as with tty devices, or back to the desktop user (if that user ever owned them *before* the devices were used - which they weren't in this case) allowing later allocation to another user again and making them also available for the desktop user. While this may be possible I can imagine the logic getting confusing if there are multiple people that are logged in. Not too bad. My background includes some extensive programming and early UNIX kernel internals. Shared devices start out owned by root, are allocated (implying ownership changes) when opened by the user and ownership returns to root when usage ends. There are use counts and associated structures that are checked to see if the device is in use. With Linux it may be different, but some facility that implements some sort of similar control has to exist as a general purpose resource for management of the system. The Q now is will changing ownership of these affect the volume slider? Shouldn't? First one is an LSB shared object, second one is data. No neither of these should impact volume. What impacts volumes with regards to flash is if the plugin is actually loaded(which requires going to a page that has a flash object), and actually plays some audio. Before that happens nothing with the audio subsystem is touched as far as I know.. Yep. In my case, it was the T'bird mail notification that played the sound. Before I write a bug report (after seeing that one doesn't exist), anything else you think I could look for or try? Not off the top of my head.. I guess last words would be don't be surprised if it doesn't get fixed(short of getting off the scheme of changing ownership of dev devices entirely for things like audio), which I don't think(hope) would happen until a major OS rev is issued. I agree. Since this would (apparently, based on what is seen) necessitate the changing of some important library routines and/or application logic. It wouldn't surprise me if the response was something like Why are you running as multiple users? That's stupid!. nate snip sig stuff Regardless, your assistance has been most generous and helpful. I appreciate your selflessness. Thanks, -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Mysql replication stopped after 5.2 update.
I did that, as soon as I start replication, the relay file gets corrupted and replication stops. []a. - Original Message - From: Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2008 7:43:29 PM (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mysql replication stopped after 5.2 update. Alessandro Ren wrote: Has someone had problems with the mysql version of Centos 5.2? After I upgraded, the replication broke, the relay file got corrupted, I had to downgrade for it to work again. no such problems here. You could potentially rebase your replica's once you have done the upgrade. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Alessandro Ren http://www.opservices.com.br [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.2 kernel [2.6.18-92.1.1.el5] crashes on dual-PIII Compaq ProLiant 3000
on 7-9-2008 12:24 PM Mauriat spake the following: 2008/6/26 Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: We have created a new test kernel that has an upstream patch to fix this issue, please test this and see if it fixes your issues: http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/kernel/5/bz443853/ So this is for those who already have a booting Centos. Is there a work-around for those trying to install on a Powernow system with a 5.2 media? Or do they have to have to revert to trying a 5.1 media? -Mauriat Right now you will have to install with either 5.1 media and update, and don't reboot with the bad kernel selected. Maybe the CentOS team will post a fixed install disk, maybe not. I doubt that RedHat will fix it until 5.3, but maybe they will. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Evolution in CentOS 5.2
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:27 AM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone else noticed these flaky (new?) behaviors in Evo since the 5.2 upgrade: - failure to autocomplete email addresses for known contacts I found something awry here, and I'm not sure if it's Evo, Gnome or CentOS (not a clue!): I noticed this problem originally at home, but I rarely send emails out directly from Evo there, but then I noticed it here at work, too. So I opened the Contacts window. Okay, I tried to. I got an immediate error that Evo could not access my addressbook and to check and see if the path existed. Here's the path: /home/mrichter/.evolution/addressbook/local/system Here's what I found: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ll -d .evolution/ drwxr-xr-x 9 mrichter RnD 4096 Jul 9 16:05 .evolution// [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ll .evolution/ total 168 drwxr-xr-x 4 mrichter RnD 4096 Jul 9 16:05 addressbook/ drwx-- 4 mrichter RnD 4096 Jun 3 13:32 cache/ drwxrwxr-x 5 mrichter RnD 4096 Jul 3 14:11 calendar/ -rw--- 1 mrichter RnD 3 Jul 9 16:05 camel-cert.db -rw-rw-r-- 1 mrichter RnD 3152 Apr 29 12:25 categories.xml -rw--- 1 mrichter RnD 65536 Jul 9 16:05 cert8.db -rw--- 1 mrichter RnD 32768 Jul 9 16:05 key3.db drwxrwxr-x 8 mrichter RnD 4096 Jul 9 16:05 mail/ drwxrwxr-x 4 mrichter RnD 4096 Apr 29 12:25 memos/ -rw--- 1 mrichter RnD 32768 Apr 29 12:25 secmod.db drwx-- 2 mrichter RnD 4096 May 14 15:00 signatures/ drwxrwxr-x 4 mrichter RnD 4096 Apr 29 12:25 tasks/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ll .evolution/addressbook/ total 12 drwxr-xr-x 3 mrichter RnD 4096 Apr 21 11:19 local/ -rw--- 1 mrichter RnD 68 Jul 9 16:05 searches.xml drwxr-xr-x 2 mrichter RnD 4096 May 16 10:13 views/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ll .evolution/addressbook/local/ total 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 mrichter RnD 4096 Jun 20 19:48 system/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ll .evolution/addressbook/local/system/ total 32 -rw-r--r-- 1 mrichter RnD 24576 Jun 19 16:24 addressbook.db -rw-r--r-- 1 mrichter RnD 4833 Jun 19 16:24 addressbook.db.summary So I'm stumped - I own every single directory down the path to the addressbook, and the addressbook itself, and I have write rights to all of them. Any ideas? Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Evolution in CentOS 5.2
MHR wrote: So I'm stumped - I own every single directory down the path to the addressbook, and the addressbook itself, and I have write rights to all of them. Maybe it's not looking where you think it is looking.. I'd run the app with strace to find out what files it is attempting to open. What I do is: strace -fF command 1/tmp/strace.log 21 nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: CentOS Patch for http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113
on 7-9-2008 1:08 PM John R Pierce spake the following: Sean Carolan wrote: Will there be a BIND patch available for this vulnerability, for CentOS 3.9? http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113 for that matter, how do I figure out what version(s) of Bind for CentOS 4 or 5 include fixes for this? I'm getting a little lost poking around the forums and KB and RHEL's own website is being remarkably obtuse for me today. This will test your server for the vulnerability; dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Evolution in CentOS 5.2
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 4:35 PM, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe it's not looking where you think it is looking.. I'd run the app with strace to find out what files it is attempting to open. What I do is: strace -fF command 1/tmp/strace.log 21 I got a ton of output, but there is no addressbook at all in the trace. Also: 1) /home is an NFS mount (with exact matches on userids), so the .evolution/ tree is also on the reomte system. 2) When I copied the old addressbook back in, Evo ignores it. 3) When I added a new contact, the file remains unchanged, but the contacts are visible in Evo. 4) I'm waiting for the nfs writeback to see what happens if I try this another way. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Shell Script Question
What's the simplest way to increment the number up by one until some other 4 digit number while preserving leading zero's until the 1000's has a digit other than 0? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Shell Script Question
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
What's the simplest way to increment the number up by one until some other
4 digit number while
preserving leading zero's until the 1000's has a digit other than 0?
In zsh, it would be something like:
for i in {..}; do
echo $i
done
-steve
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Shell Script Question
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's the simplest way to increment the number up by one until some other 4 digit number while preserving leading zero's until the 1000's has a digit other than 0? Your homework done in a snap! for (i=0; i1000;i++); do printf %04d\n i done Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. The Merchant of Venice ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Total lockup caused by Shift-{print screen}
Robert Nichols wrote:
I just had the misfortune to press Shift-{print screen} accidentally
while in a Gnome desktop, and the result was a completely unresponsive
system where the only recovery was a power switch initiated shutdown.
Further investigation shows the runaway creation of gnome-screenshot
processes.
System is CentOS 5.2 fully updated on an Intel i686.
Suggestions about what component should receive the bugzilla report
are welcome.
I've opened bugzilla report #0002971 against metacity, since that appears
to be what interprets the {print screen} key.
--
Bob Nichols NOSPAM is really part of my email address.
Do NOT delete it.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Shell Script Question
Your homework done in a snap! Lol, nah, not homework :P I don't know what I was thinking, long day. OTH, I never seq could do this as well! Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Evolution in CentOS 5.2
MHR wrote: On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 4:35 PM, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe it's not looking where you think it is looking.. I'd run the app with strace to find out what files it is attempting to open. What I do is: strace -fF command 1/tmp/strace.log 21 I got a ton of output, but there is no addressbook at all in the trace. I noticed that too, I'm not too familiar with evolution, but it seems to spawn another process that handles the address book which for some reason strace doesn't pick up, it must use another method other than fork to cause that process to spawn up. Even after I exit evolution that process is running and has the addressbook file open. from my debian desktop - (starting with 0 evolution processes in the process list) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ strace -fF evolution 1/tmp/strace.log 21 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ lsof | grep address lsof: WARNING: can't stat() ext3 file system /dev/.static/dev Output information may be incomplete. evolution 4456 aphro 40u REG8,1 12288 19447939 /home/aphro/.evolution/addressbook/local/system/addressbook.db evolution 4456 aphro 41r REG8,187 19447942 /home/aphro/.evolution/addressbook/local/system/addressbook.db.summary (deleted) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ grep 4456 strace.log (which means evolution never spawned that process via normal forking, which I don't recall ever encountering before, must be one of those new desktop app protocols that seem to be increasingly used) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ ps auxw | grep 4456 aphro 4456 0.6 0.2 67192 6692 ?Sl 17:38 0:00 /usr/lib/evolution/evolution-data-server-1.6 --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_DataServer_InterfaceCheck --oaf-ior-fd=54 aphro 4512 0.0 0.0 2848 712 pts/5S+ 17:39 0:00 grep 4456 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ grep addressbook.db strace.log The next thing I suggest is stopping evolution, and killing all evolution processes on the system and starting evolution again and see if that fixes it. nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Shell Script Question
What's the simplest way to increment the number up by one until some other 4 digit number while preserving leading zero's until the 1000's has a digit other than 0? Lots of answers, depending on the shell. I like this version for ksh: typeset -Z4 a=-1 while (( a++ 1000 )) do print $a done Not enough use is made of typeset :-) -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Shell Script Question
Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's the simplest way to increment the number up by one until some other 4 digit number while preserving leading zero's until the 1000's has a digit other than 0? Easy: $ seq -f %04g Best, --- Les Bell, RHCE, CISSP [http://www.lesbell.com.au] Tel: +61 2 9451 1144 FreeWorldDialup: 800909 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: anything in CentOS 5.2 that uses opendns.com when browsing web?
On 7/9/08, Victor Padro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pfsense could do the job also, if you install tinyDNS and increase the cache limit which is 1Mb by default to perhaps 100mb. I'm giving a try right now because my ISP here in mexico city is so damn slow to resolve domains outside the america continent. Hola Victor: Gracias. I will add Pfsense and tinyDNS to the list of things I need to read up on. Having my own Caching DNS Server, in my Firewall/Router box, is probably the best way to eliminate these problems. If I can do that on CentOS that would be great, and I'm sure that just about anything can be done on CentOS, but I am going to look into doing it with my IPCop box or on SME Server, first, which would probably be much easier for me to get up and running properly. I have a backup IPCop box, that I probably can do this on. It has a P3 500MHz CPU and 384 MB of RAM. I don't think CentOS 5.2 will run on that, but maybe CentOS 4.6 will run OK on it. Until WiMax or TelMex become available in our rural subdivision (in Colombia) at this time, ADSL is our best option for connectivity, but probably it would be nice, only to use them for connectivity and not for DNS. Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Evolution in CentOS 5.2
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 5:42 PM, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The next thing I suggest is stopping evolution, and killing all evolution processes on the system and starting evolution again and see if that fixes it. Well, it didn't /fix/ the problem, but it did restore the original behavior (error opening the contacts address book). I did notice that the addressbook.db file remained unchanged throughout all of this, but the addressbook.db.summary was different. I'm thinking maybe it somehow got corrupted by whatever changes went in between 5.1 and 5.2? I've filed a bugzilla report against this with gnome, and, btw, also one for bug-buddy's refusal to submit bugzilla reports on gnome 2.16 because it's too old. Hopefully they will go somewhere Meanwhile, still open to suggestions Thanks! mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] yum dependency problem
Hi: Today when I do yum update I get this: Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check -- Processing Dependency: libdirectfb-0.9.so.25 for package: mplayer --- Package directfb.i386 0:1.0.1-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package amrnb.i386 0:7.0.0.2-1.el5.rf set to be updated --- Package gsm.i386 0:1.0.12-1.el5.rf set to be updated -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libdirectfb-0.9.so.25 is needed by package mplayer and I have to admit I don't understand that it says it's going to update directfb.i386 then it says directfb is required by mplayer. Huh? perhaps it means it's trying to replace my existing directfb with a DIFFERENT verson and can't because mplayer needs the existing one? the existing directfb I have is: directfb-0.9.25.1-1.el5.rf which came from the same repo as my mplayer: mplayer-1.0-0.38.rc1try2.el5.rf so am I to assume that some other repo (with a greater priority, since I'm using the priority plugin) is trying to overwrite the one I got from the rf repo? the base repos (base, updates, addons and extras) are all priority 1, centosplus and contrib are 2. rpmforge is 10. that's all there are. What's wrong here? Thanks! -- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. -- Philippians 4:13 --- pgpM9MO1e7p6k.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Java Setup
Hi People I have been following the instructions here http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/JavaOnCentOS but trying to modify them for jdk-6u7-linux-amd64.rpm but there doesn't see to be a compatible java-1.6.0-sun-compat-*.rpm.Does one exist ? If not can anyone point me to some documentation on how I can manually set up things so alternatives will work allowing multiple Java versions. Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum dependency problem
You need to take this to the rpmforge mailing list - Dag just posted a note there about this specific problem. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Does sprof work on CentOS5?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Hywel Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. LD_PROFILE=libmy.so ./mymain ... $ sprof libmy.so /var/tmp/libmy.so.profile sprof: failed to load shared object `libmy.so' Acutally I have no idea of what sprof is or does, but from the error message above it seems sprof cannot find your library because it is not in the default library search path. Try this: $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. sprof libmy.so /var/tmp/libmy.so.profile Let us know how that goes. HTH, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
