[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0579 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 vsftpd - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0579 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0579.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/vsftpd-1.2.1-3E.16.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0616 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 thunderbird - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0616 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0616.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/thunderbird-1.5.0.12-14.el4.centos.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-es] Problemas Iptables - Direccionar a maquina interna
Tambien te recomiendo Shorewall, un bune manual te lo recomiendo: http://www.com-sl.org/staticpages/index.php?page=config-shorewall Suerte. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] looking for Ubuntu config for Dag Wieers' mrepo
Rudi Ahlers wrote: Hi Does anyone have a sample configuration file to setup a repository for Ubuntu, to use with mrepo? mrepo is for rpm based distributions as it builds yum/apt *rpm* repositories. No idea how you got the idea one could use it for deb based distributions. Ralph pgpIRxPw3YI8T.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] looking for Ubuntu config for Dag Wieers' mrepo
Ralph Strangeness wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: Hi Does anyone have a sample configuration file to setup a repository for Ubuntu, to use with mrepo? mrepo is for rpm based distributions as it builds yum/apt *rpm* repositories. No idea how you got the idea one could use it for deb based distributions. Ralph ___ Well, I was under the impressions it really just mirrored the upstream repository? I'm trying to have a .deb repository on my LAN, and would like to have it on my CentOS server, and the info on the Ubuntu forums looks like it's meant to run on a Ubuntu machine only. So, I was hoping someone has done this already? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1574 - Release Date: 7/25/2008 4:27 PM ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] preferred software RAID 10?
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: John R Pierce wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: And then, how do I setup the partitioning? Do I setup /boot on a separate RAID partition? If so, what happens if I want to replace the 1st 2 HDD's with bigger ones? each partition is raided seperately with mdadm you could make the whole thing one LVM partition thats raid10, then use LVM to dice it up into file systems. if you have 4 drives and are doing software raid10, you won't be swapping drives with different sizes without a WHOLE lotta pain. Ok, so how do I do this? Let's say I have 4x 160GB HDD's now, and plan on replacing them with 4x 500GB HDD's in the future? Personally I would never put an OS install on a higher RAID then RAID1, because it gets too messy to upgrade like you suggested. What setup would help with a upgrade in the future? /boot shouldn't be mirrored, as the BIOS won't know how to boot it. leave /dev/sdb1 the same size as /dev/sda1 and call it /boot2 and try to remember to copy /boot to /boot2 each time you update the kernel. I understand this, but how do you boot from /boot2 on the second HDD if the 1st have failed? Could you not get a system that had 2 drives for the OS and 4 drives for data? No, unfortunately not :( I have a 2U rackmount case with very limited space inside. I have setup 4 disk RAID10 systems before, but they were never intended to be upgraded (in place at least). I can forward a couple of recipes, but let me first say that to do it from the CentOS install media requires 2 RAID1s and LVM striping because the RAID10 option isn't on the media, but it is functionally equivalent both in useable space and performance. Would you mind forwarding me your recipes? I'd love to try it out, and I have some time right now to setup the RAID 10 system If you want to use the MD RAID10 driver you need to build it from a working system then install on it. -Ross __ -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1574 - Release Date: 7/25/2008 4:27 PM ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s!
Dear All, I selected CentOS5 in my works and installed them in two DELL PowerEdge1950. However, a trouble blocked me during the machines run after two days. The machines crashed and the syslog said it got the following messages: -- part dump of /var/log/messages -- . Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c045bc58] ? exit_mmap+0x93/0xc9 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04214c2] ? mmput+0x25/0x68 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046e9c9] ? flush_old_exec+0x4f8/0x777 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046dfcf] ? kernel_read+0x32/0x43 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c0490e60] ? load_elf_binary+0x359/0x1152 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c045a6ee] ? get_user_pages+0x2d5/0x35c Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04570d2] ? page_address+0x78/0x98 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c045735a] ? kmap_high+0x19/0x16b Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04570d2] ? page_address+0x78/0x98 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046dced] ? copy_strings+0x169/0x173 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046ddad] ? search_binary_handler+0x8f/0x1af Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046efe7] ? do_execve+0x133/0x194 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04030d7] ? sys_execve+0x2a/0x4a Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04047aa] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c061] ? early_init_intel+0x0/0x3c Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: === Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7 stuck for 61s! [sshd:24188] Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: Pid: 24188, comm: sshd Not tainted (2.6.25.3 #3) Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: EIP: 0060:[c06154f0] EFLAGS: 00200293 CPU: 7 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: EIP is at _spin_lock+0xa/0x15 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: EAX: c079349c EBX: f79ec580 ECX: EDX: 8381 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: ESI: EDI: f79ec580 EBP: f68a6580 ESP: f1824e50 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: SS: 0068 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: CR0: 8005003b CR2: b7ebf978 CR3: 32996000 CR4: 06f0 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: DR0: DR1: DR2: DR3: Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04119c7] ? native_flush_tlb_others+0x49/0x9b Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c0411e65] ? flush_tlb_mm+0x51/0x54 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c045bc58] ? exit_mmap+0x93/0xc9 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04214c2] ? mmput+0x25/0x68 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046e9c9] ? flush_old_exec+0x4f8/0x777 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046dfcf] ? kernel_read+0x32/0x43 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c0490e60] ? load_elf_binary+0x359/0x1152 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c045a6ee] ? get_user_pages+0x2d5/0x35c Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04570d2] ? page_address+0x78/0x98 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c045735a] ? kmap_high+0x19/0x16b Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04570d2] ? page_address+0x78/0x98 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046dced] ? copy_strings+0x169/0x173 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046ddad] ? search_binary_handler+0x8f/0x1af Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046efe7] ? do_execve+0x133/0x194 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04030d7] ? sys_execve+0x2a/0x4a Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04047aa] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c061] ? early_init_intel+0x0/0x3c Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: === Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [http_cap:12228] . --- I choose CentOS because I believe it is the most stable OS in commodity machines. But I don't know how to do when facing the trouble. The difference lies in that I patched a PF_RING patch in original kernel and recompiled the kernel to run my machines. I wonder whether the patched kernel crashes the CentOS because PF_RING automatically downloads the kernel codes from www.kernel.org, but not the one from www.centos.org? Or, the centOS holds the bugs in its distribution? Hope somebody can given me some advices. Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Ian ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] looking for Ubuntu config for Dag Wieers' mrepo
Rudi Ahlers wrote: Ralph Strangeness wrote: ^^^ Is that supposed to be funny? mrepo is for rpm based distributions as it builds yum/apt *rpm* repositories. No idea how you got the idea one could use it for deb based distributions. Well, I was under the impressions it really just mirrored the upstream repository? I'm trying to have a .deb repository on my LAN, and would like to have it on my CentOS server, and the info on the Ubuntu forums looks like it's meant to run on a Ubuntu machine only. So, I was hoping someone has done this already? We run debmirror and debmirrorx on our ubuntu/debian mirror - which is on CentOS. Those are just perl scripts, so they can run on CentOS. Cheers, Ralph pgp2UdcoIMxRq.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firewall in CentOS 5.1
Ray Leventhal ha scritto: Robert Spangler wrote: On Thursday 24 July 2008 03:34, Gopinath Achari wrote: Please suggest me a good firewall package for Cent OS 5.1 Server. This server is going to face to internet and will be accessed by the branch offices. adding a late voice to this thread, I've used and enjoyed the cli of apf which acts as a front end for iptables http://rfxnetworks.com/apf.php no rpm of which I'm aware, but the install is non-intrusive and very simple -Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I use shorewall in some server from 5-6 yesars without problems. http://www.shorewall.net/ Amedeo Fragai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] looking for Ubuntu config for Dag Wieers' mrepo
Ralph Angenendt wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: Ralph Strangeness wrote: ^^^ Is that supposed to be funny? Where did u get that? I don't see it on my side? mrepo is for rpm based distributions as it builds yum/apt *rpm* repositories. No idea how you got the idea one could use it for deb based distributions. Well, I was under the impressions it really just mirrored the upstream repository? I'm trying to have a .deb repository on my LAN, and would like to have it on my CentOS server, and the info on the Ubuntu forums looks like it's meant to run on a Ubuntu machine only. So, I was hoping someone has done this already? We run debmirror and debmirrorx on our ubuntu/debian mirror - which is on CentOS. Those are just perl scripts, so they can run on CentOS. Cheers, Ralph ___ Cool, so can you specify which repositories to mirror with it, like with mrepo? Cause I don't want to mirror the whole ubuntu repo - bandwidth is limited -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1574 - Release Date: 7/25/2008 4:27 PM ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] preferred software RAID 10?
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: Hi all I'm looking at setting up software RAID 10, using CentOS 5.1 x64 - what is the best way todo this? I'm reading some sources on the internet, and get a lot of different suggestions 1 suggestion says to boot up with a Live CD like Knoppix or SystemRescueCD, setup the RAID 10 partitions, and then install Linux from there. 2. Another is to setup a small RAID 1 on the first 2 HDD's, install Linux, bootup, and then setup the rest as RAID 10 The others didn't really make sense to me, so how do I actually do this? And then, how do I setup the partitioning? Do I setup /boot on a separate RAID partition? If so, what happens if I want to replace the 1st 2 HDD's with bigger ones? What's the hardware setup? I didn't really specify any, cause I want to keep it purely software. Generally it would be on a generic PIV motherboard with 4 / 6 SATA, or even mixed SATA IDE HDD's - all new, so at least 80GB per HDD I was primarily interested in the # of HDDs that can be used. If you have 6 disks, setup 2 disks as a RAID1 for the OS and the other 4 as a RAID10 for the data. If you have 4 disks all together: 1) create /boot partition as a 4 disk RAID1 across all 4 disks 2) create the remaining space as 2 separate RAID1s of type LVM 3) create a VG out of the 2 RAID1 PVs, create root, swap LVs on the VG with a stripe of 2. LVM striping over multiple RAID1 PVs provides the same performance as a native RAID10 array, plus you can add RAID1s later to increase the size/performance and dump/restore the data to stripe it across the larger set of PVs. -Ross _ Thanx, this seems like a fairly easy way of doing it. From what I gather, the data will fill up from the beginning of the stripe, right? So the 1st 2 HDD's will work hardest in the beginning, until there's enough data to fill the other 2 HDD's - unless of cause I split the LV's across the PV's - i.e. put root on md1 swap or var on md2 for example. Does swap need to be part of the RAID set? Is there actually a performance boost? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1574 - Release Date: 7/25/2008 4:27 PM ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] preferred software RAID 10?
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Kai Schaetzl wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote on Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:10:48 +0200: /boot shouldn't be mirrored, as the BIOS won't know how to boot it. leave /dev/sdb1 the same size as /dev/sda1 and call it /boot2 and try to remember to copy /boot to /boot2 each time you update the kernel. I understand this, but how do you boot from /boot2 on the second HDD if the 1st have failed? You don't (*). I don't understand John's advice here. There is no problem md mirroring /boot. You just need to install grub a second time on the other disk. For that you have to boot from it. (I think I also did it successfully without booting from the other disk in the past, but last time I tried it it didn't want to work like I remembered it should.) (*) Anyway, you would boot from a Rescue CD or such and rename it ... Yes, no problems, I had /boot mirrored across 4 drives (NAS box) and grub installed on each. If you use labels for /boot in fstab you don't even need to edit fstab from a rescue CD, just remove the failed first drive and boot. -Ross _ Can you please explain this to me? I've never used labels before, so if you could maybe show me a sample of how it's setup? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1574 - Release Date: 7/25/2008 4:27 PM ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 41, Issue 11
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest... Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2008:0607 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 kernel Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2008:0607 Important CentOS 4 i386 kernel Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2008:0616 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 thunderbird Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2008:0616 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 thunderbird Update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CESA-2008:0616 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 thunderbird Update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CESA-2008:0616 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 thunderbird Update (Johnny Hughes) 7. CESA-2008:0575 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 rdesktopUpdate (Johnny Hughes) 8. CESA-2008:0575 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 rdesktopUpdate (Johnny Hughes) 9. CESA-2008:0576 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 rdesktop - security update (Tru Huynh) 10. CESA-2008:0576 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 rdesktop - security update (Tru Huynh) 11. CESA-2008:0579 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 vsftpd -security update (Tru Huynh) 12. CESA-2008:0579 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 vsftpd - security update (Tru Huynh) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:44:27 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0607 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 kernel Update To: CentOS-Announce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0607 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0607.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: kernel-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.x86_64.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.x86_64.rpm kernel-doc-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.noarch.rpm kernel-largesmp-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.x86_64.rpm kernel-largesmp-devel-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.x86_64.rpm kernel-smp-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.x86_64.rpm kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.x86_64.rpm kernel-xenU-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.x86_64.rpm kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.x86_64.rpm src: kernel-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.src.rpm -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080724/f2d3c9eb/signature-0001.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:44:30 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0607 Important CentOS 4 i386 kernel Update To: CentOS-Announce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0607 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0607.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: kernel-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.i586.rpm kernel-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.i686.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.i586.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.i686.rpm kernel-doc-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.noarch.rpm kernel-hugemem-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.i686.rpm kernel-hugemem-devel-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.i686.rpm kernel-smp-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.i586.rpm kernel-smp-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.i686.rpm kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.i586.rpm kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.i686.rpm kernel-xenU-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.i686.rpm kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.i686.rpm src: kernel-2.6.9-67.0.22.EL.src.rpm -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080724/b844df13/signature-0001.bin -- Message: 3 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:46:44 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0616 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 thunderbird Update To: CentOS-Announce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0616 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0616.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: thunderbird-1.5.0.12-14.el4.centos.i386.rpm src: thunderbird-1.5.0.12-14.el4.centos.src.rpm -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes
[CentOS] how do I get Ubuntu installed as a XEN domU guest?
Hi all, Does anyone have a working tutorial on installing an Ubuntu domU guest onto a CentOS XEN server? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1574 - Release Date: 7/25/2008 4:27 PM ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] looking for Ubuntu config for Dag Wieers' mrepo
Rudi Ahlers wrote on Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:48:41 +0200: Where did u get that? I don't see it on my side? It's in the mail that was distributed to the list. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] preferred software RAID 10?
Rudi Ahlers wrote on Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:19:14 +0200: I've never used labels before CentOS uses labels in grub.conf and fstab by default if you do a standard installation (no mdraid devices), I wasn't aware that you can use labels in connection with md devices. I'd be interested in that as well. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] looking for Ubuntu config for Dag Wieers' mrepo
Rudi Ahlers wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: Ralph Strangeness wrote: ^^^ Is that supposed to be funny? Where did u get that? I don't see it on my side? In the mail you sent to this list. We run debmirror and debmirrorx on our ubuntu/debian mirror - which is on CentOS. Those are just perl scripts, so they can run on CentOS. Cool, so can you specify which repositories to mirror with it, like with mrepo? Cause I don't want to mirror the whole ubuntu repo - bandwidth is limited Yes. I don't have syntax and configuration handy (cannot reach the mirror from here), but it is doable with debmirror. Ralph pgpCFobKNrr3e.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how do I get Ubuntu installed as a XEN domU guest?
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 7:13 AM, Rudi Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Does anyone have a working tutorial on installing an Ubuntu domU guest onto a CentOS XEN server? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1574 - Release Date: 7/25/2008 4:27 PM ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Perhaps you should start using Xen Wiki, here: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/HowTos Cheers, -- It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion. Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente servidas ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s!
Ian jonhson wrote: Dear All, I selected CentOS5 in my works and installed them in two DELL PowerEdge1950. However, a trouble blocked me during the machines run after two days. The machines crashed and the syslog said it got the following messages: -- part dump of /var/log/messages -- . Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c045bc58] ? exit_mmap+0x93/0xc9 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04214c2] ? mmput+0x25/0x68 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046e9c9] ? flush_old_exec+0x4f8/0x777 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046dfcf] ? kernel_read+0x32/0x43 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c0490e60] ? load_elf_binary+0x359/0x1152 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c045a6ee] ? get_user_pages+0x2d5/0x35c Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04570d2] ? page_address+0x78/0x98 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c045735a] ? kmap_high+0x19/0x16b Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04570d2] ? page_address+0x78/0x98 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046dced] ? copy_strings+0x169/0x173 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046ddad] ? search_binary_handler+0x8f/0x1af Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046efe7] ? do_execve+0x133/0x194 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04030d7] ? sys_execve+0x2a/0x4a Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04047aa] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c061] ? early_init_intel+0x0/0x3c Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: === Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7 stuck for 61s! [sshd:24188] Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: Pid: 24188, comm: sshd Not tainted (2.6.25.3 #3) Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: EIP: 0060:[c06154f0] EFLAGS: 00200293 CPU: 7 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: EIP is at _spin_lock+0xa/0x15 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: EAX: c079349c EBX: f79ec580 ECX: EDX: 8381 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: ESI: EDI: f79ec580 EBP: f68a6580 ESP: f1824e50 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: SS: 0068 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: CR0: 8005003b CR2: b7ebf978 CR3: 32996000 CR4: 06f0 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: DR0: DR1: DR2: DR3: Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04119c7] ? native_flush_tlb_others+0x49/0x9b Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c0411e65] ? flush_tlb_mm+0x51/0x54 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c045bc58] ? exit_mmap+0x93/0xc9 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04214c2] ? mmput+0x25/0x68 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046e9c9] ? flush_old_exec+0x4f8/0x777 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046dfcf] ? kernel_read+0x32/0x43 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c0490e60] ? load_elf_binary+0x359/0x1152 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c045a6ee] ? get_user_pages+0x2d5/0x35c Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04570d2] ? page_address+0x78/0x98 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c045735a] ? kmap_high+0x19/0x16b Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04570d2] ? page_address+0x78/0x98 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046dced] ? copy_strings+0x169/0x173 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046ddad] ? search_binary_handler+0x8f/0x1af Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c046efe7] ? do_execve+0x133/0x194 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04030d7] ? sys_execve+0x2a/0x4a Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c04047aa] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [c061] ? early_init_intel+0x0/0x3c Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: === Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [http_cap:12228] . --- I choose CentOS because I believe it is the most stable OS in commodity machines. But I don't know how to do when facing the trouble. The difference lies in that I patched a PF_RING patch in original kernel and recompiled the kernel to run my machines. I wonder whether the patched kernel crashes the CentOS because PF_RING automatically downloads the kernel codes from www.kernel.org, but not the one from www.centos.org? Or, the centOS holds the bugs in its distribution? This is very common, a google search for: 'poweredge 1950' 'BUG: soft lockup' 'stuck' produces almost 2000 results. It seems to be something to do with the on board network ports. I do not seen this problem ... has anyone else? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1 NFS problems
Thankyou everyone. I updated the 5.2 kernel onto 5.1 and everything seems to work fine. Thanks for all of your help and wisdom. TIA On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Mag Gam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not an option at my university :-( Then you can try the patched kernel offered by Johnny Hughes: http://people.centos.org/~hughesjr/kernel/5/bz32/ Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] yum search prints 13 times the same package results
Hi all Why yum search prints 13 times the same results? I enabled according CentOS wiki the RPMforge repository. # yum search youtube-dl Loading fastestmirror plugin Loading priorities plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * rpmforge: ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de * base: mirror.widexs.nl * updates: archive.cs.uu.nl * addons: mirror.widexs.nl * extras: mirror.widexs.nl 274 packages excluded due to repository priority protections youtube-dl.noarch : Download videos from YouTube.com youtube-dl.noarch : Download videos from YouTube.com youtube-dl.noarch : Download videos from YouTube.com youtube-dl.noarch : Download videos from YouTube.com youtube-dl.noarch : Download videos from YouTube.com youtube-dl.noarch : Download videos from YouTube.com youtube-dl.noarch : Download videos from YouTube.com youtube-dl.noarch : Download videos from YouTube.com youtube-dl.noarch : Download videos from YouTube.com youtube-dl.noarch : Download videos from YouTube.com youtube-dl.noarch : Download videos from YouTube.com youtube-dl.noarch : Download videos from YouTube.com youtube-dl.noarch : Download videos from YouTube.com regards Sven ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum search prints 13 times the same package results
Sven wrote on Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:20:09 +0200: Why yum search prints 13 times the same results? It's not the same package, just the same output. Functionality of search has been reduced in 5.2. Use yum list. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Gnumeric rpm
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Iain Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul, Thanks your contribution, I too miss gnumeric. However, I get these errors and the installed gnumeric crashes on opening a gnumeric file: = Package Arch Version RepositorySize = Installing: gnumerici386 1:1.8.2-2Centos5.2pj kups 12 M Installing for dependencies: goffice i386 0.6.2-1Centos5.2pj kups 1.4 M Transaction Summary = Install 2 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 13 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing: goffice # [1/2] Installing: gnumeric # [2/2] I/O error : Attempt to load network entity http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.3/docbookx.dtd /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/welcome.xml:138: parser error : Entity 'nbsp' not defined Protrademark/nbsp;and HTML. gnum; ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/welcome.xml:139: parser error : Entity 'nbsp' not defined can save files to several versions of the MS Exceltrademark/nbsp;file ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/welcome.xml:467: parser error : Entity 'nbsp' not defined The file format used by the Microsoft Exceltrademark/nbsp; ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/welcome.xml:644: parser error : chunk is not well balanced ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gnumeric.xml:408: parser error : Failure to process entity welcome welcome; ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gnumeric.xml:408: parser error : Entity 'welcome' not defined welcome; ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/quick-start.xml:1776: parser error : Entity 'hellip' not defined hellip; /guimenuitem/menuchoice. This brings up the file ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/quick-start.xml:1810: parser error : Entity 'hellip' not defined hellip;/guimenuitem/menuchoice. The interface Auto ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/quick-start.xml:1934: parser error : chunk is not well balanced ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gnumeric.xml:474: parser error : Failure to process entity quick-start quick-start; ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gnumeric.xml:474: parser error : Entity 'quick-start' not defined quick-start; ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:168: parser error : Entity 'mdash' not defined guimenuitemNew/guimenuitem mdash; Create a new ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:179: parser error : Entity 'mdash' not defined guimenuitemOpen.../guimenuitem mdash; The ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:205: parser error : Entity 'mdash' not defined guimenuitemSave/guimenuitem mdash; The ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:217: parser error : Entity 'mdash' not defined guimenuitemSave As.../guimenuitem mdash; The ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:250: parser error : Entity 'mdash' not defined guimenuitemPage Setup.../guimenuitem mdash; The ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:261: parser error : Entity 'mdash' not defined guimenuitemPrint.../guimenuitem mdash; The ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:273: parser error : Entity 'mdash' not defined guimenuitemPrint Preview.../guimenuitem mdash; The ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:305: parser error : Entity 'mdash' not defined guimenuitemSend To.../guimenuitem mdash; The ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:317: parser error : Entity 'mdash' not defined guimenuitemProperties.../guimenuitem mdash; The ^ /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:329: parser error : Entity 'mdash' not defined
[CentOS] Re: Gnumeric rpm
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Iain Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul, Thanks your contribution, I too miss gnumeric. However, I get these errors and the installed gnumeric crashes on opening a gnumeric file: = Package Arch Version RepositorySize = Installing: gnumerici386 1:1.8.2-2Centos5.2pj kups 12 M Installing for dependencies: goffice i386 0.6.2-1Centos5.2pj kups 1.4 M Transaction Summary = Install 2 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 13 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing: goffice # [1/2] Installing: gnumeric # [2/2] I/O error : Attempt to load network entity http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.3/docbookx.dtd /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/welcome.xml:138: parser error : Entity 'nbsp' not defined Protrademark/nbsp;and HTML. gnum; ^ Dear Iain: I've been googling more, found redhat bugzilla on the I/O error and network entity: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440295 Are you by chance running the Server version of Centos 5.2 with the mis-matched versions of Dockbook mentioned in this bug report? That would explain the trouble you see. I don't get that same error you see, so I can't say for sure if a system update does fix it. But it appears it might. I think also you should consider installing the gnome-doc-utils package I have, and check your xlst packages: $ rpm -qa | grep xsl libxslt-devel-1.1.17-2.el5_1.1 openoffice.org-xsltfilter-2.3.0-6.5.1.el5_2 docbook-style-xsl-1.69.1-5.1 libxslt-1.1.17-2.el5_1.1 pj -- Paul E. Johnson Professor, Political Science 1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504 University of Kansas ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] nspluginwrapper included in CentOS 5.2 fails completely
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:16 AM, Mark Hull-Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip However, the 32-bit 1.1.11 release just blew up again when I tried to save a page I was editing. Same old bug, again, only now I don't have a working version of the 64-bit browser because the nspluginwrapper is broken. I will start again from scratch and see if that helps. Good luck with that! Have you tried it on a VMWare Server? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: IPCop updates, Evolution Calendar rarely crashes now
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 7-24-2008 5:36 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following: snip At work, you do the reboot at 3 A.M. or you have users who are furious, or you send them a message the network is going down temporarily? I usually have to do updates like that on the weekends, as I can't depend on a 3AM reboot to be up in the morning when Exec's are in. A reboot I trust, but not the first one after a kernel change. On a weekend I can drive in and see what happened if necessary and switch to a backup router. In our main office I have 2 running side by side and I can log in to the T1 router and change switch ports to swap them. Then a reboot on the router to hasten the MAC changeover. Usually 5 minutes tops. Thank you for the explanation! I wondered, if you would trust it, to come back up, if you scheduled a reboot for 3 A.M. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] problems with update of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3
List, I have an 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5xen X86_64 machine that is failing to update perl. I did not see any bugs reported on the list and was wondering if anyone else had the same problem with a solution. Thanks, Greg Ennis Updating: perlx86_64 4:5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 updates 12 M Transaction Summary = Install 0 Package(s) Update 1 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 12 M Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/pod/perldiag.pod from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/c2ph.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/cpan.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/dprofpp.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/enc2xs.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/find2perl.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/h2ph.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/h2xs.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/instmodsh.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/libnetcfg.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/perlbug.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/perlcc.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/perldiag.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/perlivp.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/piconv.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/pl2pm.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/pod2html.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/pod2latex.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/pod2man.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/pod2text.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/pod2usage.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/podchecker.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/podselect.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/prove.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/psed.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/pstruct.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/s2p.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/splain.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/xsubpp.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 Error Summary ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] problems with update of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3
Gregory P. Ennis wrote: List, I have an 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5xen X86_64 machine that is failing to update perl. I did not see any bugs reported on the list and was wondering if anyone else had the same problem with a solution. Thanks, Greg Ennis Updating: perlx86_64 4:5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 updates 12 M Transaction Summary = Install 0 Package(s) Update 1 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 12 M Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/pod/perldiag.pod from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/c2ph.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/cpan.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/dprofpp.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/enc2xs.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/find2perl.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/h2ph.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/h2xs.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/instmodsh.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/libnetcfg.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/perlbug.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/perlcc.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/perldiag.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/perlivp.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/piconv.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/pl2pm.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/pod2html.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/pod2latex.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/pod2man.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/pod2text.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/pod2usage.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/podchecker.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/podselect.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/prove.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/psed.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/pstruct.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/s2p.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/splain.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 file /usr/share/man/man1/xsubpp.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 looks like you have both perl i386 and x86_64 installed ... do you need both? If so, make sure extras is also enabled. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
