[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0308 Important CentOS 4 ia64 cups - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0308 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0308.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.56.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/cups-devel-1.1.17-13.3.56.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/cups-libs-1.1.17-13.3.56.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0275 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 imap - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0275 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0275.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/imap-2002d-15.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/imap-devel-2002d-15.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/imap-utils-2002d-15.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0275 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 imap - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0275 imap security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0275.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/imap-2002d-15.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/imap-devel-2002d-15.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/imap-utils-2002d-15.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/imap-2002d-15.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update imap\* Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpjqvbCEJKfO.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-es] Crear eth0, eth0:0 y eth0:1
Hola a todos, Solo quería confirmar si esta configuración de mi interfaz de red esta bien creada antes de ponerla en marcha. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ ifcfg-eth0 ifcfg-eth0:0 ifcfg-eth0:1 ifcfg-eth0: DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static BROADCAST=192.1.1.255 HWADDR=00:0C:29:37:77:B5 IPADDR=192.1.1.12 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.1.1.0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet ifcfg-eth0:0: DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static BROADCAST=192.1.1.255 HWADDR=00:0C:29:37:77:B5 IPADDR=192.1.1.2 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.1.1.0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet ifcfg-eth0:1: DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static BROADCAST=192.1.1.255 HWADDR=00:0C:29:37:77:B5 IPADDR=192.1.1.6 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.1.1.0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet Quiero tener 3 IP´s diferentes configuradas en la misma tarjera de red. ¿Es así no? Desde ya, gracias por todo. Saludos. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Crear eth0, eth0:0 y eth0:1
Me parece que está bien. Sin embargo que via comandos puedes hacerlo con el comando ifconfig eth0:0 [ip] netmask [].. etc y debería configurarse automáticamente. Con esto quizás pudieras chequear por tí mismo. From: listas-li...@cherrytel.com To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:33:32 +0100 Subject: [CentOS-es] Crear eth0, eth0:0 y eth0:1 Hola a todos, Solo quería confirmar si esta configuración de mi interfaz de red esta bien creada antes de ponerla en marcha. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ ifcfg-eth0 ifcfg-eth0:0 ifcfg-eth0:1 ifcfg-eth0: DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static BROADCAST=192.1.1.255 HWADDR=00:0C:29:37:77:B5 IPADDR=192.1.1.12 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.1.1.0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet ifcfg-eth0:0: DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static BROADCAST=192.1.1.255 HWADDR=00:0C:29:37:77:B5 IPADDR=192.1.1.2 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.1.1.0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet ifcfg-eth0:1: DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static BROADCAST=192.1.1.255 HWADDR=00:0C:29:37:77:B5 IPADDR=192.1.1.6 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.1.1.0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet Quiero tener 3 IP´s diferentes configuradas en la misma tarjera de red. ¿Es así no? Desde ya, gracias por todo. Saludos. _ Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Spaces. It's easy! http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=createwx_url=/friends.aspxmkt=en-us___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Crear eth0, eth0:0 y eth0:1
Encontré esta dirección que te va a ayudar: http://linuxhelp.blogspot.com/2005/05/setting-up-multiple-ip-addresses-on.html Lo que pasa es que yo últimamente he estado trabajando con Debian y es un poco diferente. Cada IP virtual debe tener un archivo de configuración asociado. _ News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now! http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Crear eth0, eth0:0 y eth0:1
Para configurar virtuales te paso una config de una /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:1 DEVICE=eth0:1 BOOTPROTO=static IPADDR=192.1.1.12 BROADCAST=192.1.1.255 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.1.1.0 GATEWAY=192.1.1.1 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet 2009/2/19 Luis J Feo geoquim...@hotmail.es Me parece que está bien. Sin embargo que via comandos puedes hacerlo con el comando ifconfig eth0:0 [ip] netmask [].. etc y debería configurarse automáticamente. Con esto quizás pudieras chequear por tí mismo. -- From: listas-li...@cherrytel.com To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:33:32 +0100 Subject: [CentOS-es] Crear eth0, eth0:0 y eth0:1 Hola a todos, Solo quería confirmar si esta configuración de mi interfaz de red esta bien creada antes de ponerla en marcha. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ ifcfg-eth0 ifcfg-eth0:0 ifcfg-eth0:1 ifcfg-eth0: DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static BROADCAST=192.1.1.255 HWADDR=00:0C:29:37:77:B5 IPADDR=192.1.1.12 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.1.1.0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet ifcfg-eth0:0: DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static BROADCAST=192.1.1.255 HWADDR=00:0C:29:37:77:B5 IPADDR=192.1.1.2 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.1.1.0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet ifcfg-eth0:1: DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static BROADCAST=192.1.1.255 HWADDR=00:0C:29:37:77:B5 IPADDR=192.1.1.6 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.1.1.0 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet Quiero tener 3 IP´s diferentes configuradas en la misma tarjera de red. ¿Es así no? Desde ya, gracias por todo. Saludos. -- Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Spaces. It's easy! Try it!http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=createwx_url=/friends.aspxmkt=en-us ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Saludos ... Christian.- ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Problemas con tarjeta de red
Estimados: Tengo instalado centos 5.2, tengo una tarjeta de red davicom, la configure, no me sale error pero no tengo acceso a la red. Me sale en la consola: eth0: Tx timeout - resetting Saludos, _ Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-ussource=wlmailtagline___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Problemas con tarjeta de red
From: geoquim...@hotmail.es To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:05:42 -0400 Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Problemas con tarjeta de red Revisa esta dirección: http://www.kitiara.org/Lists-Archives/l-linux-0603/msg00592.html --- Ya lo revise y nada. Pero descubri que si funciona si arranco con el kernel 2.6.18-53.el5 El problema se da si arranco con el kernel 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 Que puede ser. Saludos From: h_villavicen...@hotmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:55:20 -0500 Subject: [CentOS-es] Problemas con tarjeta de red Estimados: Tengo instalado centos 5.2, tengo una tarjeta de red davicom, la configure, no me sale error pero no tengo acceso a la red. Me sale en la consola: eth0: Tx timeout - resetting Saludos, Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger Get it now! Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger Get it now! _ Explore the seven wonders of the world http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+worldmkt=en-USform=QBRE___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] realtime backup
CentOS List schrieb: For a speedy backup, could put the db on LVM. Then your procedure would be shutdown/freeze db, make lv snapshot, startup/unfreeze db, rsync/backup data, remove snapshot. That's what I'd suggest too, but be warned that performance on that database (if gets to be of any size to be useful) would completely suck... not unlike driving at 90mph and with the ebrake on and constantly up-and-down-shifting... -I Would a decent alternative be a master/slave, with the dumps being done from the slave. That way if the slave bogs down during the dump, it can catch up afterwards. The master shouldn't slow down at all, or very minimally as it is caching the slave transactions. One too many would's... ;) That would work, and I've done that (though not at the 5-minute interval) in production environments. But since the OP hasn't responded to this thread with any type of follow-up detail (like the size of the db), I'm wondering how much time I want to spend putting out possible solutions... Thanks everyone. At the present I am looking at 150mb worth of database. I stumbled across Zmanda. Has anything tried it? Is it suitable for my case? I'm still not sure what you want to achieve by backing up every 5 minutes. I *think* you are looking for something like PostgreSQL's Point-in-Time recovery feature. Maybe it's time to change databases... Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] USB Memory Key not recognized
From: James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca I have a USB meory key (Kingston) that I formally used with a CentOS-5.2 (32bit) system. When I plug it into a connector slot the light on the key comes on but there are no entries created in /media and no entries made to the /var/log/messages file. Maybe not enough power... Can you try another USB slot? Do you have a powered USB hub to try with it? JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Gpg-agent will not start
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 23:36:33 Lanny Marcus wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wednesday 18 February 2009 20:25:44 Lanny Marcus wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wednesday 18 February 2009 18:50:03 Lanny Marcus wrote: On 2/18/09, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tuesday 17 February 2009 20:44, Phil Schaffner wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: On Tuesday 17 February 2009 16:25:07 Steve Huff wrote: snip Anne: Glad you eliminated that problem! I'm curious as to why you are using the Konqueror web browser. The version that snip I was trying to use Konqueror as a file manager :-) The root konqueror (and other users' konqueror) were all fine, but my ~/.kde got nuked during extreme snip Thank you for the explanation. If you use KDE (I rarely do, but we use some KDE Applications), I think that's the plan. To use Konqueror as your File Manager. Sounds like the Navigation is tough. When it's working properly it's a breeze, but everything that makes file management possible is what I'd lost :-( I'm a happy bunny now, though. It's all working again, and (fingers crossed and hope fate isn't listening) I think that gpg and konqueror were the last problems to iron out. They were also among the most important, though, after IMAP. Glad you have things up and running again. Since you use KDE, and to get closer to the topic of this thread, do you use KGpg? I've tried it a few times. Yes, I've used it for years. It integrates nicely with kde-pim, and gives a gui interface that is great for quick checks on status, etc.. I still use CLI, though, for serious maintenance. Kgpg would probably do it well enough, but I just get paranoid over some things :-) and take comfort in CLI output (or lack of it, in some cases). Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ? (update)
Hi, On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 14:09, Alain Terriault ala...@music.mcgill.ca wrote: removing all my centos+ kernels and using kmod on top of redhat kernels fix my nfs lock problem. Do you mean you replaced the CentOS-Plus kernel with a kernel from RedHat? Or are you using a CentOS-Base (instead of Plus) kernel now? When you replaced it, did you upgrade it as well? What was the version of the -Plus kernel you were using? And what is the version of the -Base or RHEL kernel you are using now? If the issue happens with a version of the -Plus kernel but does not happen with the same version of the -Base kernel, I think it might deserve a little more investigation, so the details on what fixed your problem are important for us to know. Thanks! Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and SATA HotSwap
Hi, On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:57, Julio Rodanes - KNET ju...@knet.es wrote: I have read that the AHCI module allows hotplug but when I add a hot new SATA disk, the system don't detects it . Any idea of what the problem is? Even though it's hotplug, you have to give Linux a command so that it will scan the bus and add the disks to its internal tables. To do that, first you have to identify which SCSI host it will be your SATA controller, you can see a list of the ones you have with this command: ls /sys/class/scsi_host/ To identify which one is your SATA, look in /proc/scsi/scsi, for instance, if it's scsi4 there, it will be host4 in /sys. You can also look at dmesg or /var/log/dmesg and see the messages of when your other disks were detected, it will show it with names as scsiX or sd X:0:0:0. Also grep for ahci in dmesg, it might give you a clue. You might have multiple hosts in one AHCI controller, you might have to figure out which one your disk is connected, or scan all of them. Once you found which host it is, issue the following command as root: echo - - - /sys/class/scsi_host/hostX/scan I wrote hostX above, but you have to use the proper number, like host4 if your SATA is scsi4. This should work. Let us know how that goes. HTH, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Lost konqueror navigation toolbars
And to think we laughed at Windows for its registry, while both Gnome and KDE have implemented much of the same... No lessons learned here. :-( Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question on hwclock
Hi, On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 21:08, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote: I am trying to hwclock to set the time. (hwclock -w) this is what I get on standard 5.2 x86_64. hwclock: Open of /dev/rtc failed, errno=19: No such device. Any thoughts? Do you have SELinux enabled? Have you checked /var/log/audit/audit.log or /var/log/messages if the first doesn't exist? HTH, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question on hwclock
Hi, On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 21:08, Jerry Geis geisj at pagestation.com http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos wrote: / I am trying to hwclock to set the time. (hwclock -w) // this is what I get on standard 5.2 x86_64. // hwclock: Open of /dev/rtc failed, errno=19: No such device. // Any thoughts? / Do you have SELinux enabled? Have you checked /var/log/audit/audit.log or /var/log/messages if the first doesn't exist? HTH, Filipe Filipe, I have selinux disabled. more /etc/selinux/config # This file controls the state of SELinux on the system. # SELINUX= can take one of these three values: # enforcing - SELinux security policy is enforced. # permissive - SELinux prints warnings instead of enforcing. # disabled - SELinux is fully disabled. SELINUX=disabled after running hwclock --debug the two files you mentioned above did not have anything extra added. audit.log just has stuff about drond messages just has stuff about dhcp. Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Lost konqueror navigation toolbars
On Thursday 19 February 2009 12:31:59 Filipe Brandenburger wrote: And to think we laughed at Windows for its registry, while both Gnome and KDE have implemented much of the same... No lessons learned here. Not the same at all. You try doing a recovery from a screwed-up windows registry. I lost some time on this, but nothing else. Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Lost konqueror navigation toolbars
On 19/02/2009, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thursday 19 February 2009 12:31:59 Filipe Brandenburger wrote: And to think we laughed at Windows for its registry, while both Gnome and KDE have implemented much of the same... No lessons learned here. Not the same at all. You try doing a recovery from a screwed-up windows registry. I lost some time on this, but nothing else. yes you can't delete the registry in windows and get a fresh copy automagically generated mike ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] help with alternatives
I've installed java-1.6.0-openjdk (from EPEL) on a CentOS 5.2 x86_64 system and see that it has not registered itself with alternatives. First, is there a reason I should know about that it does not set itself up as an alternative? But second, if I was to configure it myself, the syntax is alternatives --install link name path priority... and other optional stuff Looking at other examples, I'm not clear on the difference between link and path in this command Thanks, Tony Schreiner Boston College ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] help with alternatives
On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote: I've installed java-1.6.0-openjdk (from EPEL) on a CentOS 5.2 x86_64 system and see that it has not registered itself with alternatives. First, is there a reason I should know about that it does not set itself up as an alternative? But second, if I was to configure it myself, the syntax is alternatives --install link name path priority... and other optional stuff Looking at other examples, I'm not clear on the difference between link and path in this command Thanks, Tony Schreiner Boston College Sorry to follow up to myself rpm -q --scripts java-1.6.0-openjdk actually shows it has commands to install itself in alternatives, but it didn't happen. I ran the commands by hand and got the error link /usr/share/javaws incorrect for slave javaws (/usr/bin/javaws javaws) that's why it didn't install. I can remove the part about javaws from the script and it works. Will investigate why that at some point. Tony ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for abackup server?
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for abackup server? Hi there, I am currently setting up a server that will house my backups (simply using rsync). This system has 4 X 500 gb drives and I am looking to raid for max drive space and data safety. Performance is not so much a concern. My experience with software raids in nil, so some of these may seem like pretty dumb questions. I was thinking a raid 1 is probably sufficient. Would it be best to raid 1 two drives each and LVM them together? My next question would be about how to do this as I have never done a linux software raid. You are in luck. I never did one before when I started too. I did a step by step procedure that covers adding and removing drives... For centos 5.x, with 4 drives. http://www.bobhoffman.com/wordpress/?page_id=44 This will take 2 drives into a raid 1, with LVM and all that. IT adds a third drive as a hot spare incase one fails. It adds a fourth as a standalone backup (good for a rync of the raid) Just remember to wait for the drives to sync up before doing too much. This is a step by step for newbs like me and is perfectly tailored for what you need. Let me know if you have any issues. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] USB Memory Key not recognized
Message-ID: 499cc7d9.9050...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:15:45 +0530, partha chowdhury kira.lau...@gmail.com wrote: what do /sbin/lsusb and fdisk -l show ? [r...@inet04 ~]# /sbin/lsusb Bus 002 Device 001: ID : Bus 001 Device 001: ID : Bus 007 Device 001: ID : Bus 003 Device 002: ID 046d:c312 Logitech, Inc. Bus 003 Device 001: ID : Bus 006 Device 001: ID : Bus 008 Device 001: ID : Bus 005 Device 001: ID : Bus 004 Device 001: ID : Bus 004 Device 002: ID 045e:0039 Microsoft Corp. IntelliMouse Optical [r...@inet04 ~]# fdisk -l Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux /dev/sda2 14 121601 976655610 8e Linux LVM [r...@inet04 ~]# Pardon the delay but I get the digest version of the mailing list. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] USB Memory Key not recognized
Based on another message respecting power to the USB key I inserted it into a port located at the back of the host and it was recognized immediately. I have no idea why it is not picked up when placed into on of the front panel usb ports but it matters not so long as I can mount it. Thanks for the help. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check
Greetings list- I have a Samba-centric question to ask. I have a particular user who claims Samba has the ability to allow users to create/edit/modify existing files of a share but NOT delete them. To my knowledge, the aforementioned permissions require the user to have write access to the share which *ALSO* gives them the ability to delete files as well. The Samba server is nothing special, simply the latest Samba running on CentOS 5, ext3 filesystem. I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone can give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is possible or not. --Tim ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] USB Memory Key not recognized
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 14:31 -0500, James B. Byrne wrote: Based on another message respecting power to the USB key I inserted it into a port located at the back of the host and it was recognized immediately. I have no idea why it is not picked up when placed into on of the front panel usb ports but it matters not so long as I can mount it. Check BIOIS setup and see if all the on-board usb ports are enabled. Also, front-panel ports usually have a small cable from the mainboard port to the panel connector. It may have become dislodged or be reversed if the connector is not keyed. Thanks for the help. HTH -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check
on 2-19-2009 11:54 AM Tim Nelson spake the following: Greetings list- I have a Samba-centric question to ask. I have a particular user who claims Samba has the ability to allow users to create/edit/modify existing files of a share but NOT delete them. To my knowledge, the aforementioned permissions require the user to have write access to the share which *ALSO* gives them the ability to delete files as well. The Samba server is nothing special, simply the latest Samba running on CentOS 5, ext3 filesystem. I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone can give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is possible or not. --Tim It is possible that a user can create a file that another user can't delete. But a user should be able to delete anything he/she created. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check
Tim Nelson wrote: I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone can give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is possible or not. It may be possible to prevent them from deleting a file, but if they have write access it wouldn't be possible from effectively deleting the file by wiping it's contents(truncating it). nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] USB Memory Key not recognized
At Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:31:26 -0500 (EST) CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Based on another message respecting power to the USB key I inserted it into a port located at the back of the host and it was recognized immediately. I have no idea why it is not picked up when placed into on of the front panel usb ports but it matters not so long as I can mount it. Sounds like your front panel usb ports don't have the power connections wired or maybe they are broken? Thanks for the help. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows hel...@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate cen...@linuxpowered.net wrote: Tim Nelson wrote: I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone can give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is possible or not. It may be possible to prevent them from deleting a file, but if they have write access it wouldn't be possible from effectively deleting the file by wiping it's contents(truncating it). However, file creation and deletion are functions of the directory permissions where the file resides. If a directory allows a user to write to it, they can create and delete files in that directory with reckless abandon. There are probably some intricate ways around this particular problem, but they can get pretty complicated really fast. HTH. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check
- MHR mhullr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate cen...@linuxpowered.net wrote: Tim Nelson wrote: I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone can give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is possible or not. It may be possible to prevent them from deleting a file, but if they have write access it wouldn't be possible from effectively deleting the file by wiping it's contents(truncating it). However, file creation and deletion are functions of the directory permissions where the file resides. If a directory allows a user to write to it, they can create and delete files in that directory with reckless abandon. There are probably some intricate ways around this particular problem, but they can get pretty complicated really fast. HTH. mhr I've been trying to devise a way around this problem and as you mentioned, it gets extremely complicated quickly. It's even more complicated than allowing users to delete files and restoring the file from a backup set. Well, at least I don't feel I'm going insane anymore (for now...). Thank you to all who responded. --Tim ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check
on 2-19-2009 1:31 PM Tim Nelson spake the following: - MHR mhullr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate centos-T6AQWPvKiI1cRAk/vaj...@public.gmane.org wrote: Tim Nelson wrote: I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone can give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is possible or not. It may be possible to prevent them from deleting a file, but if they have write access it wouldn't be possible from effectively deleting the file by wiping it's contents(truncating it). However, file creation and deletion are functions of the directory permissions where the file resides. If a directory allows a user to write to it, they can create and delete files in that directory with reckless abandon. There are probably some intricate ways around this particular problem, but they can get pretty complicated really fast. HTH. mhr I've been trying to devise a way around this problem and as you mentioned, it gets extremely complicated quickly. It's even more complicated than allowing users to delete files and restoring the file from a backup set. Well, at least I don't feel I'm going insane anymore (for now...). Thank you to all who responded. --Tim I have enabled the recycle bin vfs object on my systems. That way a user has to really try and delete a file to make it go away. Like windows, they would have to delete it, go look in the recycle bin (that you can hide) and delete it again. It has saved me many hours of recovering stuff. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check
- Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote: on 2-19-2009 1:31 PM Tim Nelson spake the following: - MHR mhullr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate centos-T6AQWPvKiI1cRAk/vaj...@public.gmane.org wrote: Tim Nelson wrote: I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone can give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is possible or not. It may be possible to prevent them from deleting a file, but if they have write access it wouldn't be possible from effectively deleting the file by wiping it's contents(truncating it). However, file creation and deletion are functions of the directory permissions where the file resides. If a directory allows a user to write to it, they can create and delete files in that directory with reckless abandon. There are probably some intricate ways around this particular problem, but they can get pretty complicated really fast. HTH. mhr I've been trying to devise a way around this problem and as you mentioned, it gets extremely complicated quickly. It's even more complicated than allowing users to delete files and restoring the file from a backup set. Well, at least I don't feel I'm going insane anymore (for now...). Thank you to all who responded. --Tim I have enabled the recycle bin vfs object on my systems. That way a user has to really try and delete a file to make it go away. Like windows, they would have to delete it, go look in the recycle bin (that you can hide) and delete it again. It has saved me many hours of recovering stuff. Ooo! This may indeed be a partial solution. 'Administrators' could have access to the Recycle Bin to restore deleted items where 'users' would not have access. Interesting... --Tim ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check
on 2-19-2009 1:53 PM Tim Nelson spake the following: - Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote: on 2-19-2009 1:31 PM Tim Nelson spake the following: - MHR mhullr...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate centos-T6AQWPvKiI1cRAk/vaj...@public.gmane.org wrote: Tim Nelson wrote: I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone can give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is possible or not. It may be possible to prevent them from deleting a file, but if they have write access it wouldn't be possible from effectively deleting the file by wiping it's contents(truncating it). However, file creation and deletion are functions of the directory permissions where the file resides. If a directory allows a user to write to it, they can create and delete files in that directory with reckless abandon. There are probably some intricate ways around this particular problem, but they can get pretty complicated really fast. HTH. mhr I've been trying to devise a way around this problem and as you mentioned, it gets extremely complicated quickly. It's even more complicated than allowing users to delete files and restoring the file from a backup set. Well, at least I don't feel I'm going insane anymore (for now...). Thank you to all who responded. --Tim I have enabled the recycle bin vfs object on my systems. That way a user has to really try and delete a file to make it go away. Like windows, they would have to delete it, go look in the recycle bin (that you can hide) and delete it again. It has saved me many hours of recovering stuff. Ooo! This may indeed be a partial solution. 'Administrators' could have access to the Recycle Bin to restore deleted items where 'users' would not have access. Interesting... --Tim And you can also set it to keep versions of deleted files. Pretty cool! But beware of most of the docs on the internet that mention creating a recycle.conf file. That option has been broken for some time, and you need to put all the definitions into smb.conf directly. Check the last post on this page for the syntax; http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=155763page=2 -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check
On Thursday 19 February 2009 04:29:03 pm MHR wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, nate cen...@linuxpowered.net wrote: Tim Nelson wrote: I've been around and around on this topic and I'm just hoping someone can give me a little sanity by confirming 'yay or nay' whether this is possible or not. It may be possible to prevent them from deleting a file, but if they have write access it wouldn't be possible from effectively deleting the file by wiping it's contents(truncating it). However, file creation and deletion are functions of the directory permissions where the file resides. If a directory allows a user to write to it, they can create and delete files in that directory with reckless abandon. There are probably some intricate ways around this particular problem, but they can get pretty complicated really fast. I've always 'enjoyed' the solutions the samba team found for interoperability. Here's a good reference that provides the juicy details: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/AccessControls.html Makes me shudder just to read it again . . . A == HTH. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by Avantel Systems, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?
I'm trying to find a CentOS 5 x86_64 video driver for an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo to support 1680X1050 resolution. There appears to be nothing at Intel - or anywhere else that I can find. Anyone know where I can find one? -- Dick Holland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Permissions - Sanity check
Tim Nelson wrote on Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:54:41 -0600 (CST): I have a particular user who claims Samba has the ability to allow users to create/edit/modify existing files of a share but NOT delete them. Not samba-specific. The sticky bit could help in this if I recall right. If you regularly reown the files to root users will still be able to create and edit, but not delete (unless in the short time until next reown). There might also be extended ACL that could do that. And setgid might be able to help in this mix as well. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] iptables question
Hi, I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement: BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips] BOX B [1 ip] I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm about to pull my hair out. Can anyone lend a hand? All my searching leads me to home firewall type arrangements using DNAT. I tried to bend one of those to fit my situation but it was a no go (most likely due to my lack of knowledge with iptables) Paul Fontenot Wells Fargo Public Key Infrastructure Team Cryptography Services|IST|EIM|TES|TIG|Wells Fargo Email: ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com Phone: (480) 437-7795 This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] iptables question
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 18:46 -0600, ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote: Hi, I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement: BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips] BOX B [1 ip] I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm about to pull my hair out. Can anyone lend a hand? All my searching leads me to home firewall type arrangements using DNAT. I tried to bend one of those to fit my situation but it was a no go (most likely due to my lack of knowledge with iptables) Why not keep the vip and move it over to the other box? Heartbeat is perfectly suited to such a task... -I ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] iptables question
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote: Hi, I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement: BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips] BOX B [1 ip] I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm about to pull my hair out. Can anyone lend a hand? All my searching leads me to home firewall type arrangements using DNAT. I tried to bend one of those to fit my situation but it was a no go (most likely due to my lack of knowledge with iptables) iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -d 192.168.0.1 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.2 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ip6tables forwarding rule
I have 2 boxes that act as IPv6 routers. One with 2 physical interfaces, the other with 6 vlan 'interfaces' on one physical interface plus a second physical interface. On both systems I have in /etc/sysconfig/network IPV6FORWARDING=yes But if I have my 'basic' ip6tables service running, only ICMP messages get through. Since both of these boxes are Centos based, I can't use the new shorewall6 that requires at least FC9 (both boxes have shorewall for IPv4 routing controls). Is there a 'simple' rule to add to forward all IPv6 traffic between the interfaces, with the other rules only impacting traffic for each host itself? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] iptables question
I add that and telnet to the port on BOX A and get Trying 192.168.0.1... telnet: connect to address 192.168.0.1: Connection refused I can telnet to that port on BOX B and get a successful connection. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Barry Brimer Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:38 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] iptables question On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote: Hi, I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement: BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips] BOX B [1 ip] I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm about to pull my hair out. Can anyone lend a hand? All my searching leads me to home firewall type arrangements using DNAT. I tried to bend one of those to fit my situation but it was a no go (most likely due to my lack of knowledge with iptables) iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -d 192.168.0.1 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.2 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?
I'm trying to find a CentOS 5 x86_64 video driver for an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo to support 1680X1050 resolution. There appears to be nothing at Intel - or anywhere else that I can find. Anyone know where I can find one? That 965 mobo uses the X3000 IGA, so you can prolly add rpmforge and install 915resolution. HTH, jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] iptables question
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 7:46 PM, ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote: I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm about to pull my hair out. While i haven't done this before, i believe the answer you're looking for lies in SNAT. It would seem the requirements would be that the traffic needs to wind up at the right destination (NAT would get you that far) but the return traffic must also appear to come from the original VIP or else the source device would not already think it has an open session with that device. Take a look here: http://www.linuxtopia.org/Linux_Firewall_iptables/x4658.html Good luck! -- Jake Paulus jakepau...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] iptables question
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote: I add that and telnet to the port on BOX A and get Trying 192.168.0.1... telnet: connect to address 192.168.0.1: Connection refused I can telnet to that port on BOX B and get a successful connection. I assume that you are not telnetting from Box A .. as that will most likely not work. Are there any additional firewall rules on Box A? Barry -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Barry Brimer Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:38 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] iptables question On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote: Hi, I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement: BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips] BOX B [1 ip] I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm about to pull my hair out. Can anyone lend a hand? All my searching leads me to home firewall type arrangements using DNAT. I tried to bend one of those to fit my situation but it was a no go (most likely due to my lack of knowledge with iptables) iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -d 192.168.0.1 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.2 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] iptables question
There are a few on there and I'm telnetting from a different box on that network. I'll dig around some more and eventually figure it out. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Barry Brimer Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 6:22 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] iptables question On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote: I add that and telnet to the port on BOX A and get Trying 192.168.0.1... telnet: connect to address 192.168.0.1: Connection refused I can telnet to that port on BOX B and get a successful connection. I assume that you are not telnetting from Box A .. as that will most likely not work. Are there any additional firewall rules on Box A? Barry -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Barry Brimer Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:38 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] iptables question On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote: Hi, I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement: BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips] BOX B [1 ip] I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm about to pull my hair out. Can anyone lend a hand? All my searching leads me to home firewall type arrangements using DNAT. I tried to bend one of those to fit my situation but it was a no go (most likely due to my lack of knowledge with iptables) iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -d 192.168.0.1 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.2 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] iptables question
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Barry Brimer Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:38 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] iptables question On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote: Hi, I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement: BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips] BOX B [1 ip] I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm about to pull my hair out. Can anyone lend a hand? All my searching leads me to home firewall type arrangements using DNAT. I tried to bend one of those to fit my situation but it was a no go (most likely due to my lack of knowledge with iptables) iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -d 192.168.0.1 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.2 Hi. DNAT is what you would be wanting. As can be seen, DNAT is processed in the PREROUTING chain in the nat table, thus it happens before packets hit the filter table and all you are doing is changing the destination address. You will still need rules in your forward chain of your filter table (it is still forward even if the packets enter and exit the same network card). This rule will need to allow the original source to talk to the new destination. Regards, Andrew. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] testing
test.. please ignore.. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for a backup server?
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org wrote: The other side of the coin (as I think you mentioned) is that many are not comfortable having LVM handle the mirroring. Are its mirroring abilities as mature or fast as md? It's certainly not documented as well at the very least. :) I remember googling for this before setting up a server some weeks ago and somebody did a benchmark. The general conclusion was stick to md for RAID 1, it has better performance. IIRC, one of the reason was while md1 will read from both disk, LVM mirror apparently only reads from the master unless it fails. Furthermore, given the nightmare of a time I'm having trying to restore a LVM PV sitting across 3 pairs of md RAID 1, I'll strongly recommend against tempting fate by using LVM for mirroring as well. Thankfully for the underlying md mirror, I can at least activate the LVM vg and offload data in rescue mode even if it won't work off a normal boot. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph L. Casale Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 2:32 AM To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution? That 965 mobo uses the X3000 IGA, so you can prolly add rpmforge and install 915resolution. Pardon my intrusion, but what does packages like that add to the default from-the-box-install? I know we use Nvidias range of gfx-cards and the proprietary driver from Nvidia, because the stereo-capabilities of that driver is supported, and even required in some cases, by most 3rd party software. Generally speaking however, most gfx-cards work fine out-of-the-box, so why wanting to install another driver? -- /Sorin smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 8:12 AM To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution? I'm trying to find a CentOS 5 x86_64 video driver for an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo to support 1680X1050 resolution. There appears to be nothing at Intel - or anywhere else that I can find. Is this an mobo-integrated gfx-card? Did you check Intels download site? Sorry, missed the line where you said you'd already checked Intels site. -- /Sorin smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question on hwclock
Jerry Geis wrote: after running hwclock --debug the two files you mentioned above did not have anything extra added. Just curious, you are running this on real hardware right not a virtual machine? nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 08:12 +0100, Sorin Srbu wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Dick Holland Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 11:26 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution? I'm trying to find a CentOS 5 x86_64 video driver for an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo to support 1680X1050 resolution. There appears to be nothing at Intel - or anywhere else that I can find. Is this an mobo-integrated gfx-card? Did you check Intels download site? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Yes, it is integrated graphics and I checked Intel and could find nothing. -- Dick Holland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 video driver for Intel DG965WHMKR at 1680X1050 resolution?
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 18:32 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote: I'm trying to find a CentOS 5 x86_64 video driver for an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo to support 1680X1050 resolution. There appears to be nothing at Intel - or anywhere else that I can find. Anyone know where I can find one? That 965 mobo uses the X3000 IGA, so you can prolly add rpmforge and install 915resolution. HTH, jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Be gentle with me, I'm a bit of a noob. Do you mean add rpmforge as a yum repository and do a yum install 915resolution? -- Dick Holland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
