Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki Access Request for Java How To's

2009-04-25 Thread Phil Schaffner

On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 12:25 -0700, Sean Gilligan wrote:
...
 
 I noticed this wiki page
 (http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CreateLocalMirror) was recently added.
 I believe using Cobbler is a valid alternative approach for this,
 right?

Please feel free to add a Cobbler summary and/or pointers to the above
page in the alternatives section which already includes mrepo, lftp, and
reposync.

Phil


___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki Access Request for Java How To's

2009-04-25 Thread Sean Gilligan

Phil Schaffner wrote:

On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 12:25 -0700, Sean Gilligan wrote:
...
  

I noticed this wiki page
(http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CreateLocalMirror) was recently added.
I believe using Cobbler is a valid alternative approach for this,
right?



Please feel free to add a Cobbler summary and/or pointers to the above
page in the alternatives section which already includes mrepo, lftp, and
reposync.

Phil

  


I'm still waiting for write-access to the Wiki.

-- Sean

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] contrib repository not mentioned on AdditionalResources/Repositories

2009-04-25 Thread Alan Bartlett
On 25/04/2009, Sean Gilligan s...@msgilligan.com wrote:
 The 'contrib' repository is mentioned on FAQ/General #13:

  
 http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-92ba307b036080a16dbffa44486cde25c081fcca

  but not on the AdditionalResources/Repositories page:

  http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories

Thanks Sean. Now mentioned.

Alan.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] How do I find xyz.rpm for CentOS?

2009-04-25 Thread JohnS
Post this in the general centos list next time.

On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 10:33 -0700, Sean Gilligan wrote:
 My next question is:  How do I find out if a particular package is 
 available in one of the repositories?

yum search package_name --enablerepo=*\repo_name

 FAQ/General #8 is Where can I get package XyZ.rpm for CentOS? and it 
 links to the  Repositories page. 
 
 What I'm looking for is links to directories of each repository or 
 (better still) a unified directory and/or search utility.
 
 Of course, I'm willing to help update pages once I get wiki write access
 
 -- Sean
 
 
 
 Alan Bartlett wrote:
  On 25/04/2009, Sean Gilligan s...@msgilligan.com wrote:

  The 'contrib' repository is mentioned on FAQ/General #13:
 
   
  http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-92ba307b036080a16dbffa44486cde25c081fcca
 
   but not on the AdditionalResources/Repositories page:
 
   http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
  
 
  Thanks Sean. Now mentioned.
 
  Alan.
  ___
  CentOS-docs mailing list
  CentOS-docs@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

 
 ___
 CentOS-docs mailing list
 CentOS-docs@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


[CentOS-docs] How do I find xyz.rpm for CentOS?

2009-04-25 Thread Sean Gilligan
My next question is:  How do I find out if a particular package is 
available in one of the repositories?

FAQ/General #8 is Where can I get package XyZ.rpm for CentOS? and it 
links to the  Repositories page. 

What I'm looking for is links to directories of each repository or 
(better still) a unified directory and/or search utility.

Of course, I'm willing to help update pages once I get wiki write access

-- Sean



Alan Bartlett wrote:
 On 25/04/2009, Sean Gilligan s...@msgilligan.com wrote:
   
 The 'contrib' repository is mentioned on FAQ/General #13:

  
 http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-92ba307b036080a16dbffa44486cde25c081fcca

  but not on the AdditionalResources/Repositories page:

  http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
 

 Thanks Sean. Now mentioned.

 Alan.
 ___
 CentOS-docs mailing list
 CentOS-docs@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
   

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] How do I find xyz.rpm for CentOS?

2009-04-25 Thread Alan Bartlett
On 25/04/2009, Sean Gilligan s...@msgilligan.com wrote:

snip

  Of course, I'm willing to help update pages once I get wiki write access

That will be for to Ralph to attend to -- in due course.

Please remember to abide by the CentOS m/l rules -- in particular no
top posting, use bottom posting only and to trim your response / reply
of all extraneous material.

Alan.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] How do I find xyz.rpm for CentOS?

2009-04-25 Thread Sean Gilligan
JohnS wrote:
 Post this in the general centos list next time.
   

Sorry.  I'm new to CentOS and I'm trying to learn things through the 
docs and I would really like to help improve them as I learn.  I'll post 
actual questions to the general list, but when I get answers I'll try to 
improve the documentation either directly or by posting on this list. 

 yum search package_name --enablerepo=*\repo_name
   


Thanks, I didn't know about the --enablerepo option to yum.
 

-- Sean
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


[CentOS-es] Apache y ServerName

2009-04-25 Thread AraDaen
Hola a todos de nuevo, tengo una duda con apache.

Tengo un servidor centos 5.3 que actua como servidor DNS con bind9 y 
servidor web con apache 2.2.
el servidor DNS funciona perfectamente tanto de forma directa como 
inversa resolviendo los nombres e ips de la red local e internet, tanto 
desde el servidor como desde clientes.

La ip del servidor es 192.168.1.201, y responde a varios registros 
(vcos.ardn.net el NS, y dos CNAME dns1.ardn.net y www.ardn.net). Al 
final os pongo el contenido de la zona, para que veáis como lo defino, 
por si no queda claro.

El servidor web está instalado, y puedo acceder a él desde cualquier 
máquina de la red. el problema que tengo es que sólo quiero que puedan 
acceder escribiendo en la barra de dirección www.ardn.net
y ahora mismo pueden acceder escribiendo también dns1.ardn.net o 
vcos.ardn.net.

Como los tres registros tiene la misma IP (dos son alias de 
vcos.ardn.net), no puedo utilizar la directiva Listen del httpd.conf 
pues seguiría respondiendo el servidor web a las peticiones de los tres 
nombres.
Lo he intentado con ServerName www.ardn.net, pensando que así sólo 
respondería a ese dominio, pero no ha sido así y puedo seguir accediendo 
escribiendo cualquiera de los otros dos nombres.

¿Alguna idea?



$ORIGIN ardn.net.
$TTL86400
@   IN  SOA vcos.ardn.net.  root.ardn.net.  (
2009042303  ; Serial
28800   ;Refresh
14400   ;Retry
360 ;Expire
86400 ) ;Minimum
IN  NS  vcos.ardn.net.
;SERVIDORES
;   IN  MX 10   mail.ardn.net. ;servidor correo

vcosIN  A   192.168.1.201 ; Centos
vos IN  A   192.168.1.202 ; OpenSolaris
vdebIN  A   192.168.1.203 ; Debian
vslack  IN  A   192.168.1.204 ; Slackware
vbsdIN  A   192.168.1.205 ; FreeBSD
vws2008 IN  A   192.168.1.206 ; Windows Server 2008
dns1IN  CNAME   vcos
www IN  CNAME   vcos

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] configurar cliente tonto centos

2009-04-25 Thread alberto Crego
Hola a todos después de unos días probando y mirando cosas al final me
decidi por usar el XDMCP y en el Gnome inié la sesion en el servidor
remoto con el GDM.

Lo que necesitaba era ejecutar una aplicacion que hicieron para Gnome
y desde varios equipos remotos tenia que ejetuar dicha aplicación en
el servidor.

Ahora las dudas que tengo, es en el tema de rendimito y consumo de
red, es decir, ahora mismo tengo probando en 10 equipos trabajando
duramente, lo que sucede (supongo que será normal) que muchas veces se
relentizan bastante, lo que quiero  hacer ahora es monitorizar a los
usuarios y la red para ver bien lo que sucede.


Ya les seguiré contando.

Un saludo.





El día 13 de abril de 2009 13:51, Eduardo Grosclaude
eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com escribió:
 2009/4/11 alberto Crego albertocr...@gmail.com:
 con el ltsp, se pueden exportar sesiones de gnome de un servidor a un equipo 
 cliente? el tema es que tengo que buscar la forma de como hacerlo sin que me 
 consuma mucho ancho de banda de la red, ni recursos del server, aun no se 
 como hacerlo mejor, de la forma A, que es mediante un cliente ligero, o la 
 opcion B, instalando en centos en el equipo cliente y ejecutar una sesion de 
 gnome de servidor en el cliente (que eso no se si se puede hacer).

 La respuesta tendrá que ver con cuánta funcionalidad necesitas
 exactamente: si te basta con correr un proceso en forma remota o si
 necesitas una sesión completa de desktop remoto.

 En el primer caso, te puede bastar una sesión ssh del cliente al
 servidor, que ejecute el proceso remoto que quieres. Para esto basta
 con que el cliente corra un servidor X, sin gestor de escritorio ni de
 ventanas. Este script puede dar una idea de lo que se necesita hacer:

 #!/bin/bash
 SERVER=192.168.0.1
 USUARIO=pepe
 PROGRAMA=system-config-users
 X :1 
 sleep 3
 DISPLAY=localhost:1 ssh $usua...@$server $PROGRAMA

 Para poder hacer esto sin que la sesión ssh pida password, puedes
 estudiar cómo editar el archivo .ssh/authorized_keys del usuario en el
 servidor agregándole la clave pública del cliente.

 En el segundo caso (sesión remota completa), hay varias formas de
 hacerlo, con diferentes requerimientos de recursos. XDMCP es la forma
 nativa en Unix de obtener sesiones remotas a través de XWindow.  Hay
 alternativas más modernas y según he escuchado más eficientes, como
 FreeNX. RDP (Remote Desktop) es una solución muy buena, en el sentido
 de que la experiencia de usuario es muy parecida a ejecutar la
 interfaz en forma local, y a veces la supera. Tiene la ventaja de
 poder aprovechar servidores Windows.

 Otra familia de soluciones corresponde a VNC (que serviría para
 compartir un mismo escritorio entre varios clientes, pero no parece
 ser tu caso).

 Tambíen quería saber si existe alguna forma en gnome de que una vez que 
 inicie la sesion se le abra el programa unicamente y no pueda ejecutar 
 otro programa.

 Puedes hacerlo modificando la estructura de menús y editando la
 configuración de arranque automático de la sesión, pero así
 posiblemente sigan quedando algunas vías de escape para los usuarios
 que tengan algo de conocimiento. Me parece más seguro empezar por no
 levantar procesos innecesarios en lugar de poner restricciones a la
 interfaz de usuario: si no quieres que use nada del Gnome, pues no lo
 actives. Creo que tus requerimientos se parecen más a los de cliente
 liviano que a los de sesión local retocada.

 Puedes crear un cliente liviano a partir de una distribución
 multipropósito como CentOS, modificando el inicio del sistema
 (editando inittab). Puedes hacerte un runlevel propio, que solamente
 dispare los procesos que necesitas. Por ejemplo, el servidor X y la
 sesión ssh al servidor invocando el programa en forma remota, como lo
 hace el script adjunto. Si no quieres que se pueda acceder a consolas
 de texto, las desactivas para ese runlevel. Para probarlo sin romper
 el sistema en funcionamiento puedes editar la línea GRUB del kernel
 indicando el número de nivel que quieres correr. Cuando lo tienes
 depurado, fijas el runlevel default y si es necesario eliminas los
 demás (esto no tiene retorno, salvo que bootees con un disco de
 rescate).

 Otra solución muy fácil, y ya empaquetada, es la distribución
 Thinstation, que te creará un cliente liviano de cualquiera de estos
 protocolos (o de todos ellos juntos), y es configurable hasta la
 náusea. Tiene la posibilidad de especificar directamente la aplicación
 que se va a correr en el servidor. La palabra clave para buscar más
 sobre este modo de funcionamiento es kiosk.

 Saludos
 --
 Eduardo Grosclaude
 Universidad Nacional del Comahue
 Neuquen, Argentina
 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Apache y ServerName

2009-04-25 Thread Manolo
AraDaen escribió:
 Hola a todos de nuevo, tengo una duda con apache.

 Tengo un servidor centos 5.3 que actua como servidor DNS con bind9 y 
 servidor web con apache 2.2.
 el servidor DNS funciona perfectamente tanto de forma directa como 
 inversa resolviendo los nombres e ips de la red local e internet, tanto 
 desde el servidor como desde clientes.

 La ip del servidor es 192.168.1.201, y responde a varios registros 
 (vcos.ardn.net el NS, y dos CNAME dns1.ardn.net y www.ardn.net). Al 
 final os pongo el contenido de la zona, para que veáis como lo defino, 
 por si no queda claro.

 El servidor web está instalado, y puedo acceder a él desde cualquier 
 máquina de la red. el problema que tengo es que sólo quiero que puedan 
 acceder escribiendo en la barra de dirección www.ardn.net
 y ahora mismo pueden acceder escribiendo también dns1.ardn.net o 
 vcos.ardn.net.

 Como los tres registros tiene la misma IP (dos son alias de 
 vcos.ardn.net), no puedo utilizar la directiva Listen del httpd.conf 
 pues seguiría respondiendo el servidor web a las peticiones de los tres 
 nombres.
 Lo he intentado con ServerName www.ardn.net, pensando que así sólo 
 respondería a ese dominio, pero no ha sido así y puedo seguir accediendo 
 escribiendo cualquiera de los otros dos nombres.

 ¿Alguna idea?



 $ORIGIN ardn.net.
 $TTL86400
 @   IN  SOA vcos.ardn.net.  root.ardn.net.  (
 2009042303  ; Serial
 28800   ;Refresh
 14400   ;Retry
 360 ;Expire
 86400 ) ;Minimum
 IN  NS  vcos.ardn.net.
 ;SERVIDORES
 ;   IN  MX 10   mail.ardn.net. ;servidor correo

 vcosIN  A   192.168.1.201 ; Centos
 vos IN  A   192.168.1.202 ; OpenSolaris
 vdebIN  A   192.168.1.203 ; Debian
 vslack  IN  A   192.168.1.204 ; Slackware
 vbsdIN  A   192.168.1.205 ; FreeBSD
 vws2008 IN  A   192.168.1.206 ; Windows Server 2008
 dns1IN  CNAME   vcos
 www IN  CNAME   vcos

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

   
Hola, asi de primeras se me ocurre que podrias crearte un virtualhost 
para www.ardn.net (con los parametros de tu site) y otro para default 
en este ultimo solo una web html indicando que no esta accediendo 
correctamente.

No se si te sirve esto.
Saludos.
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Apache y ServerName

2009-04-25 Thread AraDaen

Manolo escribió:
 AraDaen escribió:
   
 Hola a todos de nuevo, tengo una duda con apache.

 Tengo un servidor centos 5.3 que actua como servidor DNS con bind9 y 
 servidor web con apache 2.2.
 el servidor DNS funciona perfectamente tanto de forma directa como 
 inversa resolviendo los nombres e ips de la red local e internet, tanto 
 desde el servidor como desde clientes.

 La ip del servidor es 192.168.1.201, y responde a varios registros 
 (vcos.ardn.net el NS, y dos CNAME dns1.ardn.net y www.ardn.net). Al 
 final os pongo el contenido de la zona, para que veáis como lo defino, 
 por si no queda claro.

 El servidor web está instalado, y puedo acceder a él desde cualquier 
 máquina de la red. el problema que tengo es que sólo quiero que puedan 
 acceder escribiendo en la barra de dirección www.ardn.net
 y ahora mismo pueden acceder escribiendo también dns1.ardn.net o 
 vcos.ardn.net.

 Como los tres registros tiene la misma IP (dos son alias de 
 vcos.ardn.net), no puedo utilizar la directiva Listen del httpd.conf 
 pues seguiría respondiendo el servidor web a las peticiones de los tres 
 nombres.
 Lo he intentado con ServerName www.ardn.net, pensando que así sólo 
 respondería a ese dominio, pero no ha sido así y puedo seguir accediendo 
 escribiendo cualquiera de los otros dos nombres.

 ¿Alguna idea?



 $ORIGIN ardn.net.
 $TTL86400
 @   IN  SOA vcos.ardn.net.  root.ardn.net.  (
 2009042303  ; Serial
 28800   ;Refresh
 14400   ;Retry
 360 ;Expire
 86400 ) ;Minimum
 IN  NS  vcos.ardn.net.
 ;SERVIDORES
 ;   IN  MX 10   mail.ardn.net. ;servidor correo

 vcosIN  A   192.168.1.201 ; Centos
 vos IN  A   192.168.1.202 ; OpenSolaris
 vdebIN  A   192.168.1.203 ; Debian
 vslack  IN  A   192.168.1.204 ; Slackware
 vbsdIN  A   192.168.1.205 ; FreeBSD
 vws2008 IN  A   192.168.1.206 ; Windows Server 2008
 dns1IN  CNAME   vcos
 www IN  CNAME   vcos

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

   
 
 Hola, asi de primeras se me ocurre que podrias crearte un virtualhost 
 para www.ardn.net (con los parametros de tu site) y otro para default 
 en este ultimo solo una web html indicando que no esta accediendo 
 correctamente.

 No se si te sirve esto.
 Saludos.
 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

   
Hola Manolo,

Gracias por contestar :)
Sip, eso es una opción, aunque el servidor web seguiría respondiendo a 
las peticiones vcos.ardn.net y dns.ardn.net, y la idea es que no se sepa 
fácilmente que detrás de esos casos hay un servidor web también.
No se si la opción pasa por añadir mas ips al sistema, y asignar a cada 
registro una ip. Pensaba que igual alguien tenía otra opción más sencilla.

Gracias de nuevo Manolo
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] configurar cliente tonto centos

2009-04-25 Thread Arturo Limon
En cuanto a LTSP:

http://k12ltsp.org/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page

Me va de cine. Es una CentOS en toda regla, preinstalada y preconfigurada
para correr LTSP. Lo estoy utilizando en educación, aunque todavía no ha
hecho nadie mucho uso de sus funciones LTSP, que te las deja listas para
arrancar clientes gráficos vía red.

Por otra parte, como PDC Samba, firewall con iptables, servidor de correo,
servidor web (Joomla, Moodle, etc.), servidor mysql, etc ... de maravilla.

Saludos,

Arturo.


El 25 de abril de 2009 15:36, alberto Crego albertocr...@gmail.comescribió:

 Hola a todos después de unos días probando y mirando cosas al final me
 decidi por usar el XDMCP y en el Gnome inié la sesion en el servidor
 remoto con el GDM.

 Lo que necesitaba era ejecutar una aplicacion que hicieron para Gnome
 y desde varios equipos remotos tenia que ejetuar dicha aplicación en
 el servidor.

 Ahora las dudas que tengo, es en el tema de rendimito y consumo de
 red, es decir, ahora mismo tengo probando en 10 equipos trabajando
 duramente, lo que sucede (supongo que será normal) que muchas veces se
 relentizan bastante, lo que quiero  hacer ahora es monitorizar a los
 usuarios y la red para ver bien lo que sucede.


 Ya les seguiré contando.

 Un saludo.





 El día 13 de abril de 2009 13:51, Eduardo Grosclaude
 eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com escribió:
  2009/4/11 alberto Crego albertocr...@gmail.com:
  con el ltsp, se pueden exportar sesiones de gnome de un servidor a un
 equipo cliente? el tema es que tengo que buscar la forma de como hacerlo sin
 que me consuma mucho ancho de banda de la red, ni recursos del server, aun
 no se como hacerlo mejor, de la forma A, que es mediante un cliente
 ligero, o la opcion B, instalando en centos en el equipo cliente y
 ejecutar una sesion de gnome de servidor en el cliente (que eso no se si se
 puede hacer).
 
  La respuesta tendrá que ver con cuánta funcionalidad necesitas
  exactamente: si te basta con correr un proceso en forma remota o si
  necesitas una sesión completa de desktop remoto.
 
  En el primer caso, te puede bastar una sesión ssh del cliente al
  servidor, que ejecute el proceso remoto que quieres. Para esto basta
  con que el cliente corra un servidor X, sin gestor de escritorio ni de
  ventanas. Este script puede dar una idea de lo que se necesita hacer:
 
  #!/bin/bash
  SERVER=192.168.0.1
  USUARIO=pepe
  PROGRAMA=system-config-users
  X :1 
  sleep 3
  DISPLAY=localhost:1 ssh $usua...@$server $PROGRAMA
 
  Para poder hacer esto sin que la sesión ssh pida password, puedes
  estudiar cómo editar el archivo .ssh/authorized_keys del usuario en el
  servidor agregándole la clave pública del cliente.
 
  En el segundo caso (sesión remota completa), hay varias formas de
  hacerlo, con diferentes requerimientos de recursos. XDMCP es la forma
  nativa en Unix de obtener sesiones remotas a través de XWindow.  Hay
  alternativas más modernas y según he escuchado más eficientes, como
  FreeNX. RDP (Remote Desktop) es una solución muy buena, en el sentido
  de que la experiencia de usuario es muy parecida a ejecutar la
  interfaz en forma local, y a veces la supera. Tiene la ventaja de
  poder aprovechar servidores Windows.
 
  Otra familia de soluciones corresponde a VNC (que serviría para
  compartir un mismo escritorio entre varios clientes, pero no parece
  ser tu caso).
 
  Tambíen quería saber si existe alguna forma en gnome de que una vez
 que inicie la sesion se le abra el programa unicamente y no pueda ejecutar
 otro programa.
 
  Puedes hacerlo modificando la estructura de menús y editando la
  configuración de arranque automático de la sesión, pero así
  posiblemente sigan quedando algunas vías de escape para los usuarios
  que tengan algo de conocimiento. Me parece más seguro empezar por no
  levantar procesos innecesarios en lugar de poner restricciones a la
  interfaz de usuario: si no quieres que use nada del Gnome, pues no lo
  actives. Creo que tus requerimientos se parecen más a los de cliente
  liviano que a los de sesión local retocada.
 
  Puedes crear un cliente liviano a partir de una distribución
  multipropósito como CentOS, modificando el inicio del sistema
  (editando inittab). Puedes hacerte un runlevel propio, que solamente
  dispare los procesos que necesitas. Por ejemplo, el servidor X y la
  sesión ssh al servidor invocando el programa en forma remota, como lo
  hace el script adjunto. Si no quieres que se pueda acceder a consolas
  de texto, las desactivas para ese runlevel. Para probarlo sin romper
  el sistema en funcionamiento puedes editar la línea GRUB del kernel
  indicando el número de nivel que quieres correr. Cuando lo tienes
  depurado, fijas el runlevel default y si es necesario eliminas los
  demás (esto no tiene retorno, salvo que bootees con un disco de
  rescate).
 
  Otra solución muy fácil, y ya empaquetada, es la distribución
  Thinstation, que te creará un cliente liviano de cualquiera de estos
  protocolos (o de todos 

Re: [CentOS-es] Cómo crear Alias de un equipo exte rno

2009-04-25 Thread Héctor Suárez Planas
  en el fichero de zona de tu red agregas.
 
  ft1 CNAME   www1.example2.com.
 
  Yoinier. Recuerda, requieres bind.
 
 Sí, pero no me funciona. :)

Lo que quiero hacer es lo siguiente: 

Supongamos que tenemos el host... em ... smtp.gmail.com, por poner un
ejemplo, el cual cuando hago un DIG me muestra lo siguiente:

;  DiG 9.2.4  smtp.gmail.com
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 21229
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 7, ADDITIONAL: 7

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;smtp.gmail.com.IN  A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
smtp.gmail.com. 300 IN  CNAME   gmail-smtp-msa.l.google.com.
gmail-smtp-msa.l.google.com. 300 IN A   74.125.93.109
gmail-smtp-msa.l.google.com. 300 IN A   74.125.93.111

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
l.google.com.   4644IN  NS  b.l.google.com.
l.google.com.   4644IN  NS  c.l.google.com.
l.google.com.   4644IN  NS  d.l.google.com.
l.google.com.   4644IN  NS  e.l.google.com.
l.google.com.   4644IN  NS  f.l.google.com.
l.google.com.   4644IN  NS  g.l.google.com.
l.google.com.   4644IN  NS  a.l.google.com.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
a.l.google.com. 14459   IN  A   209.85.139.9
b.l.google.com. 14459   IN  A   74.125.45.9
c.l.google.com. 14459   IN  A   64.233.161.9
d.l.google.com. 14550   IN  A   74.125.77.9
e.l.google.com. 14515   IN  A   209.85.137.9
f.l.google.com. 14459   IN  A   72.14.235.9
g.l.google.com. 14510   IN  A   74.125.95.9

Esto indica que smtp.gmail.com tiene 2 IPs: 74.125.93.109 y 74.125.93.111,
pero tengo entendido que estas varían con el tiempo. Entonces lo que quiero
hacer es crear distintos aliases en mi servidor para el host smtp.gmail.com,
pero sin utilizar las IPs, sino los nombres; o sea, esto:

smtp1.gmail.com    smtp.gmail.com
smtp2.gmail.com    smtp.gmail.com
smtp3.gmail.com    smtp.gmail.com
smtp4.gmail.com    smtp.gmail.com
smtp5.gmail.com    smtp.gmail.com

Para así tener una completa sincronización con el nombre real aunque cambien
las IPs.

Puse el ejemplo con un alias de servidor de correo porque es más ilustrativo
(para que tomen la idea) que un alias de virtualhost.

 
 
  El jue, 23-04-2009 a las 08:48 -0400, Héctor Suárez Planas escribió:
   Saludos, hermanos.
  
   Tengo una pregunta: ¿cómo puedo hacer un alias de un equipo externo en
  mi
   red?
  
   Me explico, supongamos que mi red tiene el dominio example.com y mi
  equipo
   es maq1.example.com (claro, con mi DNS y todo funcionando OK), pero yo
   quiero tener un alias del equipo ft1.example2.com que está ubicado en
   Internet que sea www1.example2.com en mi red de manera que cuando yo
 le
  de
   ping a ese equipo remoto me responda con su IP correspondiente.
  
   O sea, yo lo que quiero es tener un alias del equipo, no un par
  (otronombre,
   IP), debido a que si el equipo remoto cambia la IP voy a estar
  esclavizado
   siempre actualizando el IP del alias.
  
   No sé si me hago entender.
  
   Gracias de antemano.
  
  
  
   ---
   Red Telematica de Salud - Cuba
   CNICM - Infomed
   ___
   CentOS-es mailing list
   CentOS-es@centos.org
   http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
  
 
  ___
  CentOS-es mailing list
  CentOS-es@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
 
 
 ---
 Red Telematica de Salud - Cuba
 CNICM - Infomed
 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


---
Red Telematica de Salud - Cuba
  CNICM - Infomed
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] consulta de iptables

2009-04-25 Thread Walter Cervini
Por lo que estoy observando no tienes ninguna regla para cuando hay una
peticion de nueva conexion. Deberias tener una regla de la siguiente manera


$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -o $IF_WAN -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT

Walter Cervini
movil: 0424-1543350
Pin: 20911CF3
Sent from Caracas, Venezuela

2009/4/23 Freddy Angulo samilo...@yahoo.com

  hola listeros tengo necesito de su ayuda, tengo un firewall con iptables
 en centos 5. he creado interfaces virtuales para los servicios que manejamos
 dentro de la empresa.

 eth0 wan_lan
 eth0:1  mail
 eth0:2  wan_lan2

 cuando pongo a toda la red por solo un interface salen a internet estando
 en DROP, pero cuando coloco a la misma lan por la interface virtual no sale
 a internet, pero si la coloco en ACCEPT navegan sin ningun problema.

 ###  les coloco el postruting quwe realizo, saben si necesito cargar algun
 modulo adicional o crear algun ruta, gracias por su ayuda.

 echo 1  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
 /sbin/modprobe ip_tables
 /sbin/modprobe ip_conntrack
 /sbin/modprobe iptable_filter
 /sbin/modprobe iptable_mangle
 /sbin/modprobe iptable_nat
 /sbin/modprobe ipt_LOG
 /sbin/modprobe ipt_limit
 /sbin/modprobe ipt_state
 /sbin/modprobe ipt_REDIRECT

 $IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $IF_WAN -d $LAN_CALL -o $IF_LAN -m state --state
 ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
 $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s $LAN_CALL -o $IF_WAN -j SNAT --to-source
 $IP_WAN_LAN

 $IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $IF_WAN -d $LAN_WIFI -o $IF_WIFI -m state --state
 ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
 $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.20.0.0/27 -o $IF_WAN -j SNAT
 --to-source $IP_WAN_LAN_2

 --

 ¡Obtén la mejor experiencia en la web!
 Descarga gratis el nuevo Internet Explorer 8
 http://downloads.yahoo.com/ieak8/?l=e1

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Bonding + bridge + maquina virtual.

2009-04-25 Thread Walter Cervini
Buenos Dias Mario
Por lo general cuando usas maquinas virtuales con VirtualBox y poder acceder
a las maquinas virtuales  desde la maquina anfitrion necesitar usar una
interface puente o bridge, posterior a esto debes crear una interface tunel
y esta interface la asocias al bridge sin ip. Y en la maquina virtual
asignas la ip que pertenezca a la misma red del Bridge.
Puedes tener tantas interfaces bridge como desees y del mismo modo
interfaces tunel.
Para crear una interface bridge:
brctl addbr [nombre de la Interface]
ejemplo:
brctl addbr br0
brctl addbr br1
ifconfig br0 192.168.100.1/24 up
ifconfig br1 192.168.200.1/24 up

ya en este punto tus interfaces puentes estan creada y lenvantadas. ahora
creamos las interfaces tuneles, para esto debes tener el modulo tun cargado
modprobe tun
creando las interfaces de tunnel
tunctl -u [Usuario]  -d [nobre que quieres poner a la interface]
ejemplo:
tunclt -u mario -d tun0
tunctl -u mario -d tun1
a estas interfaces no le asignas ip los haces a traves de la maquina virtual

luego agregamos las interfaces que manejara el puente o bridge
brctl addif br0 tun0
brctl addif br1 tun1
hasta aqui todo esta configurado, ahora antes de iniciar la maquina virtual
tienes que configurar la maquina virtual con interfaces del tipo
BridgeNetwork para VB 2.2 o interface anfitrio para versiones anteriores y
el nombre de la interfaz es algunas de los tuneles creados. Recuerda la ip
de la maquina virtual debera pertenecer a la red creada en el bridge.
posterior a esto inicias tu maquina virtual y desde la maquina anfitrion
intenta hacer un ping a la ip asignada a la maquina virtual.

Intenta y me comentas.

Walter Cervini
movil: 0424-1543350
Pin: 20911CF3
Sent from Caracas, Venezuela

2009/4/24 Mario Ganga mario.ga...@gmail.com

 Hola.

 Estimados tengo un server en centos 5.3 con bonding y tengo una maquina
 virtual en virtual box win2003 (en el mismo server), la idea es balancear la
 carga de red de la VM, el problema es que cuando trato de setearle el bond0
 como interfaz anfitrion arroja un error de que no reconoce la trajeta de red
 y no se inicia la VM, estube averiguando en internet y me parece que tengo
 que hacer un bridge con bridge-utils para que la maquina virtual reconozca
 el bonding.

 Ahora tengo algunas preguntas ojala me puedan ayudar:

 ¿Se puede hacer un link , por decirlo de alguna manera, entre un el
 bond0 y un bidge, si se puede me pueden guiar como hacerlo por favor?

 ¿Es factible que bonding de centos haga balanceo de la carga de red de
 mi maquina virtual?

 ¿Sera mejor deshacer el bonding y configurar dos tarjetas de red como
 conexion puente directamente en la win 2003 virtual tomando en cuenta que
 quiero balancear la carga de red?

 Espero me puedan ayudar o recomendar cual es la mejor forma de hacerlo,
 recurro a la lista ya que en el foro de virtual box, no me han respondido.

 Atento a sus comentarios me despido.


 Atte.

 Mario Ganga Castro.

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS] centos firewall?

2009-04-25 Thread Mintairov Mihail





  [r...@server1 bin]# man iptables 
  No manual entry for iptables 
  [r...@server1 bin]# man ipchains 
  No manual entry for ipchains 
  [r...@server1 bin]# 
  
 
  So is there something wrong with what they set me up with? 
 
  seems as though you need to install iptables package 
 
 [r...@server1 /]# uname -a 
 Linux Server1 2.6.24-23-xen #1 SMP Mon Jan 26 03:09:12 UTC 2009 x86_64 
 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 
 
 But if iptables is not installed, how is port 5900 being blocked? 
 
maybe the xen host is blocking them. Maybe upstream router is blocking. 

why not just use freenx and run everything through ssh port which 
clearly isn't blocked? It's faster and better anyway. 

Craig 

Or you can use X11Forwarding sshd option. To use it you shoud put 
X11Forwarding yes option to/etc/ssh/sshd_config on server side, and use 

ssh -X usern...@server

command on client side to connect to the server. After it all GUI program
wich you will start on ssh-shell will display on client computer. (This all work 
if your client computer is based on *nix system such is Linux, if you have MS Windows on client computer you 
must use the xming+putty software to do this)



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos firewall?

2009-04-25 Thread Tru Huynh
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:37:45AM +0400, Mintairov Mihail wrote:
 !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN
 HTML

Please don't post html in this mailing list.

-- 
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B


pgps5cRqr76P2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos firewall?

2009-04-25 Thread Tru Huynh
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 04:33:20PM -0700, Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote:
 [r...@server1 /]# uname -a
 Linux Server1 2.6.24-23-xen #1 SMP Mon Jan 26 03:09:12 UTC 2009 x86_64  
 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
 

Ask your hoster, this is definitely NOT a CentOS provided kernel.
Who knows what else has been changed on your distribution, but
this is no longer CentOS.

see http://wiki.centos.org/irc_centos_request

Tru
-- 
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B


pgpjZlxOltqel.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos firewall?

2009-04-25 Thread Robert Spangler
On Friday 24 April 2009 18:51, Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote:

  How do I add 5900 to the centos firewall? How do I edit the conf file?

I don't know your knowledge so
Lets go through this step by step.
Commands will be between [].
Examples will be between ''.

You are looking to see why  port 5900 is blocked.
Are you sure something is listening on this port?

Check to see if port 5900 is listening with the following:
[lsof -i]

If that port is not listed or if the service is listening on another port you 
should see this now.  If not then start the service and try to connect again.


Still having issues connecting then we should check the firewall.

First lets see if the firewall is up:
[service iptables status]

If the firewall is up this should give you a list of all the rules present.
If the firewall is not running it will state firewall is not running.

If the firewall is not running, vcn is running and you still cannot connect 
the problem is outside your control and you will have to talke with your 
service provider.  Even if the firewall is running the service provider can 
still be blocking the port so after ensureing/configuring the below and you 
are still unable to connect you need to contact the service provider and 
question them.

If the firewall is running you now have to figure out how it is being started.  
Some people use the default method (myself included) and some use scripts 
(which I believe is because they do not know how or understand how to 
configure the default setup).

First let us check in what run level the system is started.
[grep id: /etc/inittab]

You should see something like
'id:3:initdefault:'

This is run level 3 and all my startup scripts are going to start from 
'/etc/rc.d/rc3.d'.

Look in this directory for anything that might be iptables or firewall 
related.  As stated above some time a script other then the default is used 
to start the firewall.  Do you see anything other then iptables?

Scripts starting with a 'K' are not run and those with an 'S' are.

We should also check rc.local to ensure there is nothing being started there 
that might over ride firewall if it is started in 'rc3.d'.

If you have determined that the firewall is being started the default way and 
it is up and running then /etc/sysconfig/iptables is the file you have to 
look at and edit.  If the firewall is being started using another method then 
you are going to have to look at that script to determine how to 
correct/update that script.

You can edit the file with 'vim' or 'vi', depending on what is installed on 
your system, from the command line.

Here is a link to a very good IPTABLES Tutorial.
http://iptables.rlworkman.net/chunkyhtml/index.html


-- 

Regards
Robert

Linux User #296285
http://counter.li.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] MP4

2009-04-25 Thread centos
Hi,

How do get to view MP4 video streams?

-- 
Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] MP4

2009-04-25 Thread forum
You can open the stream in a program called VLC. 
--Original Message--
From: cen...@911networks.com
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
To: CentOS Mailing list
ReplyTo: CentOS Mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] MP4
Sent: Apr 25, 2009 11:27

Hi,

How do get to view MP4 video streams?

-- 
Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos firewall?

2009-04-25 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote on Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:20:24 -0700:

 There is something fundamental that I am missing and having never used  
 CentOS is probably not helping.

I think the point is that you are *not* on CentOS. Your system is 
*derived* from CentOS. You should contact your hoster.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos firewall?

2009-04-25 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote on Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:51:13 -0700:

 I only have SSH ability at this point...

That's good enough. If you are not comfortable with managing the system 
from the command line then use Webmin. Some think that is unsafe, but it 
is surely several degrees safer than using blank VNC over the net.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos firewall?

2009-04-25 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote on Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:04:23 -0700:

 and looking for /etc/sysconfig/iptables

you have to install iptables. Then you get iptables-config.
The file you mention is created when you save the state of iptables with 
service iptables save. And the rules are loaded from it on next startup. 
For that there have to be rules added to iptables (via command-line, not 
added to the file), of course!

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Problems eith yum (wrong releasever)

2009-04-25 Thread Sam Piippo
After installing clean Centos 5.3 and updating with yum update yum starts
to fail. I get the following error message


YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file.
 Eg. 7 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet/
removing mirrorlist with no valid mirrors:
//var/cache/yum/base/mirrorlist.txt

It looks like the $releasever variable has value 7. Why does this happen and
how do I fix this?

Thanks,

Sami
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problems eith yum (wrong releasever)

2009-04-25 Thread D Tucny
2009/4/26 Sam Piippo sampii...@gmail.com

 After installing clean Centos 5.3 and updating with yum update yum starts
 to fail. I get the following error message


 YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file.
  Eg. 7 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet/
 removing mirrorlist with no valid mirrors:
 //var/cache/yum/base/mirrorlist.txt

 It looks like the $releasever variable has value 7. Why does this happen
 and how do I fix this?


Check that distroverpkg in /etc/yum.conf is redhat-release, if it is, check
that centos-release is the only package providing redhat-release by running
rpm -q --whatprovides redhat-release, you should see

centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1

which shows a single package and the version is 5, this is what yum uses to
determine releasever... Do you have another package installed that also
provides redhat-release?

d
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problems eith yum (wrong releasever)

2009-04-25 Thread Sam Piippo
Thanks for the comments. I had /var directory that contained files from an
old Fedora 7 installation and I think that yum did read the $release
variable, as well as package information, from some file in /var. I fixed
the problem the easy way and reinstalled the whole system (with having a
clean /var directory). Now everything works perfectly.
I should had figured this out before posting to the mailing-list, sorry.

Sami

On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 8:10 PM, D Tucny d...@tucny.com wrote:

 2009/4/26 Sam Piippo sampii...@gmail.com

 After installing clean Centos 5.3 and updating with yum update yum starts
 to fail. I get the following error message


 YumRepo Error: All mirror URLs are not using ftp, http[s] or file.
  Eg. 7 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet/
 removing mirrorlist with no valid mirrors:
 //var/cache/yum/base/mirrorlist.txt

 It looks like the $releasever variable has value 7. Why does this happen
 and how do I fix this?


 Check that distroverpkg in /etc/yum.conf is redhat-release, if it is, check
 that centos-release is the only package providing redhat-release by running
 rpm -q --whatprovides redhat-release, you should see

 centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1

 which shows a single package and the version is 5, this is what yum uses to
 determine releasever... Do you have another package installed that also
 provides redhat-release?

 d



 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-25 Thread Kai Schaetzl
I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add 
a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or 
with the xen network script having a problem with multiple NICs and 
virtual interfaces. I could need some help/comments on this.

Some history:
I added a NIC (chip identifies as Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 
RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet) to a Dell R200 server.
CentOS 5.3 with Xen 3.3.1 (gitco repo). eth0 and eth1 are the built-in 
NICs, this is then eth2 (or it should be).
Works. Everything is fine until I add a virtual interface to eth0 and 
reboot. I can add eth0:1 at runtime just fine. But if I let it stay in 
network-scripts and boot the whole eth0 is killed (doesn't show up in 
ifconfig and doesn't work). A network restart brings it up as if nothing 
is wrong.
I first thought it might have something to do with the fact that eth0 is 
actually a bridge on Xen  3.2 and tried the same config on another 
machine and there it works. It's not the exact same xen version, not 64bit 
and it's got only 1 NIC. So there are differences, but it seems to rule 
out the bridge as a cause.

I then checked the logs more thoroughly and found that CentOS changes the 
NIC initialization order at boot-time.
Without the third NIC it's eth0=NIC1 and eth1=NIC2 (as shown on the 
chassis). But with the third NIC it's most often that one that goes first. 
Here's a typical excerpt from messages. tigon/tg3 is the driver for the 
internal NICs which normally were on eth0 and eth1.

Apr 25 19:00:59 c4 kernel: eth0: RTL8168b/8111b at 0xc2022000, 
00:21:27:c9:d1:f5, XID 3800 IRQ 16
Apr 25 19:00:59 c4 kernel: eth1: Tigon3 [partno(BCM95721) rev 4201 PHY
(5750)] (PCI Express) 10/100/1000Base-T Ethernet 00:1e:c9:fe:fb:ab
Apr 25 19:00:59 c4 kernel: eth1: RXcsums[1] LinkChgREG[0] MIirq[0] ASF[1] 
WireSpeed[1] TSOcap[1]
Apr 25 19:00:59 c4 kernel: eth1: dma_rwctrl[7618] dma_mask[64-bit]
Apr 25 19:00:59 c4 kernel: eth2: Tigon3 [partno(BCM95721) rev 4201 PHY
(5750)] (PCI Express) 10/100/1000Base-T Ethernet 00:1e:c9:fe:fb:ac
Apr 25 19:00:59 c4 kernel: eth2: RXcsums[1] LinkChgREG[0] MIirq[0] ASF[1] 
WireSpeed[1] TSOcap[1]
Apr 25 19:00:59 c4 kernel: eth2: dma_rwctrl[7618] dma_mask[64-bit]
Apr 25 19:00:59 c4 kernel: tg3: eth0: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full 
duplex.
Apr 25 19:00:59 c4 kernel: tg3: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for 
RX.
Apr 25 19:00:59 c4 kernel: r8169: eth2: link up
Apr 25 19:00:59 c4 kernel: r8169: eth2: link up
Apr 25 19:01:01 c4 ntpd[2461]: Listening on interface eth2, 
192.168.2.4#123 Enabled
Apr 25 19:01:01 c4 ntpd[2461]: Listening on interface eth0, 
192.168.1.24#123 Enabled
Apr 25 19:01:01 c4 ntpd[2461]: Listening on interface eth1, 
192.168.2.3#123 Enabled
Apr 25 19:01:08 c4 uxmon: c4.net: started monitoring: lo eth2 eth0 eth1
Apr 25 19:01:18 c4 kernel: tg3: peth0: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full 
duplex.
Apr 25 19:01:18 c4 kernel: tg3: peth0: Flow control is on for TX and on 
for RX.
Apr 25 19:01:18 c4 kernel: device peth0 entered promiscuous mode
Apr 25 19:01:18 c4 kernel: type=1700 audit(1240678878.244:3): dev=peth0 
prom=256 old_prom=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295
Apr 25 19:01:18 c4 kernel: eth0: topology change detected, propagating
Apr 25 19:01:18 c4 kernel: eth0: port 1(peth0) entering forwarding state

Repeated booting sometimes gives me a different order, e.g. the two tigon 
come first, but this is rare.

Well, it seems this wasn't a problem until I added a virtual interface to 
eth0. When the eth interfaces are brought up the system seems to 
reenumerate the eth numbering according to the HWADDR matches and thus 
eth0=NIC1 and so on. As soon as I add a virtual interface to eth0 this 
breaks and all of eth0 is killed. At least that's what I figure.

So, the next obvious question is: How can I set a fixed order, so that 
NIC1 is always brought up first as eth0?

I'm not sure if this would fix it, though. I have done too few reboots 
yet, but it seems that at least once I got the correct initialization 
order but eth0 got killed, anyway. So, it might not be the order but still 
something in the Xen script which happens only when multiple NICs are 
present and a virtual interface is added.

Any thoughts so far?

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-25 Thread JohnS

On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
 I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add 
 a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or 
 with the xen network script having a problem with multiple NICs and 
 virtual interfaces. I could need some help/comments on this.
 
 Some history:
 I added a NIC (chip identifies as Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 
 RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet) to a Dell R200 server.
 CentOS 5.3 with Xen 3.3.1 (gitco repo). 

see this:
http://linux.dell.com/files/whitepapers/nic-enum-whitepaper-v3.pdf

This is a known issue with all Poweredge Servers. It will give you an
explanation and workaround for it.

JohnStanley

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] repository for mod_security

2009-04-25 Thread David Hrbáč
Bowie Bailey napsal(a):
 I want to add mod_security to my Apache server running CentOS 5.3 and am
 trying to find a repository to get it from.  I found it in EPEL, but
 they have version 2.1.7, which is over a year old according to what I
 found on the modsecurity.org website.  Is there a repository which is
 keeping this up to date?  Or should I just build it from source?
 

Within my repos:
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/x86_64/repoview/
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/x86_64/repoview/

I can rebuild the latest one.
David Hrbáč
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-25 Thread Les Mikesell
JohnS wrote:
 On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
 I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add 
 a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or 
 with the xen network script having a problem with multiple NICs and 
 virtual interfaces. I could need some help/comments on this.

 Some history:
 I added a NIC (chip identifies as Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 
 RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet) to a Dell R200 server.
 CentOS 5.3 with Xen 3.3.1 (gitco repo). 
 
 see this:
 http://linux.dell.com/files/whitepapers/nic-enum-whitepaper-v3.pdf
 
 This is a known issue with all Poweredge Servers. It will give you an
 explanation and workaround for it.

I don't think there is anything unique to Dells about this.  The kernel 
essentially randomizes device naming on everything.  Dell just took the 
trouble to document it.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-25 Thread JohnS

On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:52 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
 JohnS wrote:
  On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
  I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add 
  a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or 
  with the xen network script having a problem with multiple NICs and 
  virtual interfaces. I could need some help/comments on this.
 
  Some history:
  I added a NIC (chip identifies as Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 
  RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet) to a Dell R200 server.
  CentOS 5.3 with Xen 3.3.1 (gitco repo). 
  
  see this:
  http://linux.dell.com/files/whitepapers/nic-enum-whitepaper-v3.pdf
  
  This is a known issue with all Poweredge Servers. It will give you an
  explanation and workaround for it.
 
 I don't think there is anything unique to Dells about this.  The kernel 
 essentially randomizes device naming on everything.  Dell just took the 
 trouble to document it.

From what I understand this was only with dell hardware that this was
happening and they submitted a patch to red hat. Also it is the only
hardware I have encountered with the problem also. There could be
others.

What's more is Kai says he's running 5.3 but the fix should be in that
kernel. What I do wonder is if when the centos kernel was built, was it
included? Maybe the CentOS Kernel builder could let us know? 

2.6.19-rc3 and higher are supposed to have the fix?

It is however a strange thing when you encounter it. I pulled my hair
for a long time.

Last thing is he has this problem on a R200 and from memory those were
not a problem. Could be this is something new? He could check for a BIOS
Revision if there is one.

JohnStanley

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] df -h shows system at 100% used, but there is space left

2009-04-25 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Dnk wrote on Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:04:38 -0700:

 What does that command do exactly?

what about using man?

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-25 Thread JohnS

On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:52 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
 JohnS wrote:
  On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
  I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add 
  a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or 
  with the xen network script having a problem with multiple NICs and 
  virtual interfaces. I could need some help/comments on this.
 
  Some history:
  I added a NIC (chip identifies as Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 
  RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet) to a Dell R200 server.
  CentOS 5.3 with Xen 3.3.1 (gitco repo). 
  
  see this:
  http://linux.dell.com/files/whitepapers/nic-enum-whitepaper-v3.pdf
  
  This is a known issue with all Poweredge Servers. It will give you an
  explanation and workaround for it.
 
 I don't think there is anything unique to Dells about this.  The kernel 
 essentially randomizes device naming on everything.  Dell just took the 
 trouble to document it.
---

Also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491432
Seems to apply to Kais case.

You *must* specify the HWADDR field in the ifcfg-* files in order to
have persistent ethernet naming. Was the way I done it on dell hardware
and it states that on the Bug Report.

JohnStanley


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-25 Thread Les Mikesell
JohnS wrote:
 On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:52 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
 JohnS wrote:
 On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
 I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add 
 a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or 
 with the xen network script having a problem with multiple NICs and 
 virtual interfaces. I could need some help/comments on this.

 Some history:
 I added a NIC (chip identifies as Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 
 RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet) to a Dell R200 server.
 CentOS 5.3 with Xen 3.3.1 (gitco repo). 
 
 see this:
 http://linux.dell.com/files/whitepapers/nic-enum-whitepaper-v3.pdf

 This is a known issue with all Poweredge Servers. It will give you an
 explanation and workaround for it.
 I don't think there is anything unique to Dells about this.  The kernel 
 essentially randomizes device naming on everything.  Dell just took the 
 trouble to document it.
 ---
 
 Also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491432
 Seems to apply to Kais case.
 
 You *must* specify the HWADDR field in the ifcfg-* files in order to
 have persistent ethernet naming. Was the way I done it on dell hardware
 and it states that on the Bug Report.

I've had my ifcfg-* files renamed to ifcfg-*.bak files and ignored 
completely when moving drives, even among identical hardware.  It's no 
fun when shipping to remote locations where the on-site people don't 
know much about linux.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] df -h shows system at 100% used, but there is space left

2009-04-25 Thread Dnk




On 25-Apr-09, at 1:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:

 Dnk wrote on Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:04:38 -0700:

 What does that command do exactly?

 what about using man?

 Kai

 --  


Been there, done that since I had gotten back to a Linux box. :-) I  
was out and about when I read your reply and got curious.

Thanks in advance.

D 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Olivier Castien/Roncq/Infofrance/FRA/TZG est absent.

2009-04-25 Thread Olivier_Castien

Je serai absent(e) à partir du  25/04/2009 de retour le 04/05/2009.

Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour. En cas d'urgence, vous pouvez
contacter l'équipe technique d'infofrance.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-25 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:32:06 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org 
wrote:

 
 
 On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:52 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
  JohnS wrote:
   On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
   I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I 
   add 
   a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or 
   with the xen network script having a problem with multiple NICs and 
   virtual interfaces. I could need some help/comments on this.
  
   Some history:
   I added a NIC (chip identifies as Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. 
   RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet) to a Dell R200 server.
   CentOS 5.3 with Xen 3.3.1 (gitco repo). 
   
   see this:
   http://linux.dell.com/files/whitepapers/nic-enum-whitepaper-v3.pdf
   
   This is a known issue with all Poweredge Servers. It will give you an
   explanation and workaround for it.
  
  I don't think there is anything unique to Dells about this.  The kernel 
  essentially randomizes device naming on everything.  Dell just took the 
  trouble to document it.
 ---
 
 Also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491432
 Seems to apply to Kais case.
 
 You *must* specify the HWADDR field in the ifcfg-* files in order to
 have persistent ethernet naming. Was the way I done it on dell hardware
 and it states that on the Bug Report.

On ALL RedHat flavored distros (even eith 2.4 kernels), I *always*
specificed the HWADDR field in the ifcfg-* files.  I *think* the RedHat
installers generally always set this field during installation as well.
At least as early as RH 7.mumble or RH 9, which would be when I first
was dealing with machines with more than one NIC.

 
 JohnStanley
 
 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
   

-- 
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System
http://www.deepsoft.com/  -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows
hel...@deepsoft.com   -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/
   
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Antivirus for CentOS? (yuck!)

2009-04-25 Thread Ross Walker
On 4/24/09 8:05 AM, NM n...@altiva.fr wrote:

 On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:10:38 -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
 
 How about running it as the untrusted user 'clamav'?
 
 How's that user going to check anything that's not o+r?

How about selinux? You could make a context that allows clamav read rights
to everything, and write to none. You could even develop your own PCI
compliant selinux security framework that can be applied to all PCI hosts.

 I know there is a lot of boilerplate regulation out there, I have my
 fair share to deal with myself. Often hidden in the BS there is a good
 intention it just requires a little give and take. Give in to a little
 BS here to get a little break on the BS there.
 
 What the consultant should be working off of is an accurate risk
 assessment of the OS and the applications installed on it, not some dumb
 checklist.
 
 Yeah, well, problem is, you don't get to choose who's going to assess you.

Well you can either go with the compliance flow, or you can let the
compliance flow take you kicking and screaming. Either way your regulated
now and there isn't anything you can do about it. It's the world we live in
today I'm afraid.

If you don't like the way the consultant is doing things, then after this
cycle is complete, take control of the process. Do your own risk assessments
on the hardware and software and develop your own PCI compliant controls
that more accurately reflects the true threats and vulnerabilities of your
environment instead of the perceived threats and vulnerabilities being
used now.

Having your own regular in-house risk assessment performed can only help you
in both developing and supporting your decisions for which controls are
applied to which systems. And even if you need a token install of anti-virus
everywhere to appease the regulator gods, it isn't the end of the world. If
your risk analysis of the software determines it poses a great enough risk,
you can impose controls on it like I mentioned above.

-Ross


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Olivier Castien/Roncq/Infofrance/FRA/TZG est absent.

2009-04-25 Thread Lanny Marcus
2009/4/25  olivier_cast...@zieglergroup.com:
 Je serai absent(e) à partir du  25/04/2009 de retour le 04/05/2009.

 Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour. En cas d'urgence, vous pouvez
 contacter l'équipe technique d'infofrance.
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

This is a message from his Vacation Responder. He will be back on the
4th of May 2009.
Can the list administrator remove or disable him from the mailing
list? (I can read Spanish, but this is French)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-25 Thread Kai Schaetzl
JohnS wrote on Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:32:06 -0400:

 You *must* specify the HWADDR field in the ifcfg-* files in order to
 have persistent ethernet naming.

And that is what I always do. Never done it another way.
You may have overlooked that part in my message where I state that it 
works without a problem despite this juggling around until I add a virtual 
interface to eth0. I'll try tomorrow adding HWADDR to eth0:1 as well, but 
I think this will fail.
I guess I will have to turn off in the BIOS or remove eth2 and maybe eth1 
as well tomorrow and run some more tests with just one adapter and then 
add to it. I hope I can switch off eth2 in the BIOS somehow. I would hate 
to remove it as it is below the SAS adapter and the many SATA cables.

Thanks for the answers so far. At least confirms that the simple juggling 
around of the main network interfaces is normal and to be expected.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimal kickstart.cfg requested

2009-04-25 Thread listmail
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:48:43 -0500, Daniel_Curry wrote
 I'm looking at building about a dozen CentOS VM's for a project.  I have
 a desire to use kickstart for this coupled with PXE.  I'm looking 
 for a minimal ks.cfg file specifically, I want the bare minimum of software
 that is needed for a system to function.  I will need sshd and yum as
 the only 'services or applications' on top of the OS.  Does anyone have
 an example I can work with, or suggestions on getting to this minimal
 configuration? I'm just looking to save some time, rather than
 re-inventing what may and probably is already out there.
 
If you find such a thing, please post to the list. You're not the only
one who could use something like that, as the installer and its defaults
make it almost impossible to do consistent installations.

Thanks,
--Bill
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimal kickstart.cfg requested

2009-04-25 Thread James A. Peltier
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, daniel_cu...@dell.com wrote:

 Hello, all.

 I'm looking at building about a dozen CentOS VM's for a project.  I have
 a desire to use kickstart for this coupled with PXE.  I'm looking for a
 minimal ks.cfg file specifically, I want the bare minimum of software
 that is needed for a system to function.  I will need sshd and yum as
 the only 'services or applications' on top of the OS.  Does anyone have
 an example I can work with, or suggestions on getting to this minimal
 configuration? I'm just looking to save some time, rather than
 re-inventing what may and probably is already out there.

I assume that you are looking for all of the packages that can be removed 
from an install that just has @core and @virtualization specified for the 
package groups that you want installed?

-- 
James A. Peltier
Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director
Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus
Phone   : 778-782-6573
Fax : 778-782-3045
E-Mail  : jpelt...@sfu.ca
Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca | http://vivarium.cs.sfu.ca
   http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier
MSN : subatomic_s...@hotmail.com

The point of the HPC scheduler is to
keep everyone equally unhappy.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimal kickstart.cfg requested

2009-04-25 Thread Eric Sisolak
One way to do this would be to use %packages --nobase.  This is an
extremely stripped down install, that is still functional (well it
boots).  You will need to add packages to it, especially since yum and
ssh aren't included.  Many other utilities will be missing as well,
hopefully this link will get you closer to what you want.

http://openrent.blogspot.com/2005/11/ultra-minimal-kickstart.html

--
Eric

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 9:48 PM, daniel_cu...@dell.com wrote:

 Hello, all.

 I'm looking at building about a dozen CentOS VM's for a project.  I have
 a desire to use kickstart for this coupled with PXE.  I'm looking for a
 minimal ks.cfg file specifically, I want the bare minimum of software
 that is needed for a system to function.  I will need sshd and yum as
 the only 'services or applications' on top of the OS.  Does anyone have
 an example I can work with, or suggestions on getting to this minimal
 configuration? I'm just looking to save some time, rather than
 re-inventing what may and probably is already out there.

 Thanks

 Daniel
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] df -h shows system at 100% used, but there is space left

2009-04-25 Thread Eric Sisolak
The amount shown under Avail does not include the reserve, even if
it is set.  If the reserve is used, then avail (and Use%) become a
negative value.  For example it might say -2.5GB Available.

The Size does include the reserve however.

I agree with Jake that this is due to it rounding 99.5% used to a whole number.

--
Eric

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
 At Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:43:57 -0700 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org 
 wrote:


 Has anyone seen output like this before? Notice on my /dev/md0 That it
 reports 100% used, but also 5.3 Gb available. What would cause this?



 # df -h
 Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
 /dev/sda2              71G  1.6G   66G   3% /
 /dev/sda1              99M   22M   73M  23% /boot
 tmpfs                 506M     0  506M   0% /dev/shm
 /dev/md0              903G  851G  5.3G 100% /home


 Thanks in advance!

 There is a 'reserve' of space, that only root can write to.  In the case
 of /dev/md0 above, normal users will get a 'no space left on device'
 error trying to write files.  root, however, can still manage to write
 another 5.3 gig before encountering this error.  It only shows up as so
 large because the reserve space is a *percentage* of the total file
 system, and /dev/md0 is a huge file system.


 d


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



 --
 Robert Heller             -- 978-544-6933
 Deepwoods Software        -- Download the Model Railroad System
 http://www.deepsoft.com/  -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows
 hel...@deepsoft.com       -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos