Re: [CentOS-docs] Homepage request
Ralph -- Where are you? Please remember that there are certain things only you can do . . . Alan. Thanks Alan, Maybe we should give Ralph a while ... GaoHu ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Homepage request
On 6 March 2011 07:59, gaohu tigerhei...@gmail.com wrote: Ralph -- Where are you? Please remember that there are certain things only you can do . . . Alan. Thanks Alan, Maybe we should give Ralph a while ... GaoHu . . . or time to recover from yet another excellent beer festival! Alan. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] Homepage request
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, Alan Bartlett wrote: Ralph -- Where are you? Please remember that there are certain things only you can do . . . well, not exactly .. the page and acl for GaoHu is now present http://wiki.centos.org/GaoHu and he should be able to edit it -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Homepage request
On 6 March 2011 17:35, R P Herrold herr...@centos.org wrote: On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, Alan Bartlett wrote: Ralph -- Where are you? Please remember that there are certain things only you can do . . . well, not exactly .. the page and acl for GaoHu is now present http://wiki.centos.org/GaoHu and he should be able to edit it Thanks, Russ. ;-) Alan, ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-es] Problemas con Yum y python
Saludos listeros, tengo CentOS 5.5 instalado y no habia usado el yum para nada, ahora por asunto en dependencias decido instalarlo y me da error. [root@quad yum]# rpm -ivh yum-3.2.22-26.el5.centos.noarch.rpm warning: yum-3.2.22-26.el5.centos.noarch.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID e8562897 Preparing...### [100%] 1:yum### [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/comps.pyc;4d72713c: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch Cuando trate de usar el yum clean all como me sugirieron me devuelve el sgte error [root@quad yum]# yum clean all There was a problem importing one of the Python modules required to run yum. The error leading to this problem was: No module named i18n Please install a package which provides this module, or verify that the module is installed correctly. It's possible that the above module doesn't match the current version of Python, which is: 2.4.3 (#1, Sep 3 2009, 15:37:12) [GCC 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-46)] If you cannot solve this problem yourself, please go to the yum faq at: http://wiki.linux.duke.edu/YumFaq No se que puedo hacer, el servidor me trabaja perfecto, solo este detalle cuando trate de instalar Yum, no tengo acceso a internet para documentarme en el YumFaq Que paquete es el que tiene que ver con i18n en python? Gracias. -- Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos, y se considera que está limpio. For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk -- Este mensaje le ha llegado mediante el servicio de correo electronico que ofrece Infomed para respaldar el cumplimiento de las misiones del Sistema Nacional de Salud. La persona que envia este correo asume el compromiso de usar el servicio a tales fines y cumplir con las regulaciones establecidas Infomed: http://www.sld.cu/ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] Octet (was: IP6 Anyone?)
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:32:34 + Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote: On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 04:12 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote: Those of us who've used older mainframes (such as the PDP-10) remember byte being a synonym for bit field and a byte could be any number of bits, typically from 1 to 36 (on a 36-bit-wide machine). 7-bit and 9-bit bytes were quite common on such machines. PDP being a 'main franme'? Baby mainframe perhaps when compared to Honeywell's (later Bull's) Level 66? Level 66 had 36 bit words which could be used as 6 BCD characters or 4 ASCII characters. Baby? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDP-10 BR, Bob ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Octet (was: IP6 Anyone?)
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 14:36 +0100, Bob Marcan wrote: On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:32:34 + Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote: PDP being a 'main franme'? Baby mainframe perhaps when compared to Honeywell's (later Bull's) Level 66? Level 66 had 36 bit words which could be used as 6 BCD characters or 4 ASCII characters. Baby? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDP-10 I never saw any DEC installtion :-( Working exclusively on Honeywell for over 30 years I was a bit biased. Saw the Amstelveen (NL) computer centre of KLM. It had over 400 hard disk drives! I also saw Honeywell upgrading a L66 machine so it would run faster. The engineer pulled-out a PCB and took it away. That 'upgrade' cost over 1 million NLG (Dutch guilders). With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - What are you looking forward to?
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:33:10PM -0500, Kwan Lowe wrote: On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:11 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: IBM Power servers since the Power4+ CPU (they are up to Power7 now) have hardware partitioning support, commonly known as LPAR. LPAR can be divided in units of 1/10th of a CPU. The software to manage this is now called PowerVM (its been called other names in the past, not all polite). [informative text snipped] Yes, it is some nice stuff... In particular, having the hardware partitioning capability plays nice with Oracle licensing. Under KVM or Xen we still have to license the entire system. This probably won't change with the newer kvm, but one can hope. It's kind of funny since OracleVM *is* Xen, and it's counted as hardware partitioning :) -- Pasi On the Linux side I would like to see how KSM (kernel memory merge) stacks up against memory compression on the Power7 side. Not sure if this made it into RHEL6, but hope springs eternal... Storage management is always a big issue for me. AIX has some really great tools for managing disks. In Linux the LUN, block and fs layer are still relatively decoupled which gives an enormous amount of flexibility but certain types of changes require multiple commands on Linux. On the desktop side I've been running RHEL6 as my primary environment since release. Transition was easy. My old kickstart files needed tweaking, but so far it's been a breeze. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - What are you looking forward to?
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi wrote: On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:33:10PM -0500, Kwan Lowe wrote: On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:11 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: IBM Power servers since the Power4+ CPU (they are up to Power7 now) have hardware partitioning support, commonly known as LPAR. LPAR can be divided in units of 1/10th of a CPU. The software to manage this is now called PowerVM (its been called other names in the past, not all polite). [informative text snipped] Yes, it is some nice stuff... In particular, having the hardware partitioning capability plays nice with Oracle licensing. Under KVM or Xen we still have to license the entire system. This probably won't change with the newer kvm, but one can hope. It's kind of funny since OracleVM *is* Xen, and it's counted as hardware partitioning :) -- Pasi On the Linux side I would like to see how KSM (kernel memory merge) stacks up against memory compression on the Power7 side. Not sure if this made it into RHEL6, but hope springs eternal... Storage management is always a big issue for me. AIX has some really great tools for managing disks. In Linux the LUN, block and fs layer are still relatively decoupled which gives an enormous amount of flexibility but certain types of changes require multiple commands on Linux. On the desktop side I've been running RHEL6 as my primary environment since release. Transition was easy. My old kickstart files needed tweaking, but so far it's been a breeze. What did you hve to tweak? I noticed the new use of the '%end' flag to mark the end of a section, and the new partitioning structure which names the LVM based volumes and groups things which contain the hostname. (This is a big deal if you have multiple virtual hosts on a machihe and want to compare their internal LVM's side by side from the virtualization server.) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - What are you looking forward to?
We are a data shop. nfs v4 support native XFS support ext4 Hopefully by 6.4 they will have native brtfs :-) On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi wrote: On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:33:10PM -0500, Kwan Lowe wrote: On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:11 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: IBM Power servers since the Power4+ CPU (they are up to Power7 now) have hardware partitioning support, commonly known as LPAR. LPAR can be divided in units of 1/10th of a CPU. The software to manage this is now called PowerVM (its been called other names in the past, not all polite). [informative text snipped] Yes, it is some nice stuff... In particular, having the hardware partitioning capability plays nice with Oracle licensing. Under KVM or Xen we still have to license the entire system. This probably won't change with the newer kvm, but one can hope. It's kind of funny since OracleVM *is* Xen, and it's counted as hardware partitioning :) -- Pasi On the Linux side I would like to see how KSM (kernel memory merge) stacks up against memory compression on the Power7 side. Not sure if this made it into RHEL6, but hope springs eternal... Storage management is always a big issue for me. AIX has some really great tools for managing disks. In Linux the LUN, block and fs layer are still relatively decoupled which gives an enormous amount of flexibility but certain types of changes require multiple commands on Linux. On the desktop side I've been running RHEL6 as my primary environment since release. Transition was easy. My old kickstart files needed tweaking, but so far it's been a breeze. What did you hve to tweak? I noticed the new use of the '%end' flag to mark the end of a section, and the new partitioning structure which names the LVM based volumes and groups things which contain the hostname. (This is a big deal if you have multiple virtual hosts on a machihe and want to compare their internal LVM's side by side from the virtualization server.) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS and Marvell SAS/SATA drivers
On 03/06/2011 09:00 AM, compdoc wrote: Regarding the Marvell drivers, I had good luck with the 'sata_mv' driver in Scientific Linux 6 just yesterday, running a pair of 4-port PCIe-x4 Tempo 'Sonnet' controller cards. Are those the Mac/Windows Sonnet cards that go for less than $200? What kind of performance you seeing? Are you doing software raid on them? Yes, those are the cards which target Windows and OS-X, but they work fine on Linux as well. They use the Marvell 88SX series chips. They control 6 2TB WD Caviar Black drives, arranged as 5 drives in a RAID-6 array with one hot spare. 3 drives are connected to each of two cards. mdstat shows array re-sync speed is usually over 100 MBytes/sec although that tends to vary quite a bit over time. -- On 03/06/2011 09:00 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 03/05/11 7:01 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: areca works.. for SAS, I prefer LSI Logic. The Supermicro mobo I'm using (X8DAL-3) has an on-board LSI 1068E SAS/SATA controller chip, although I have the RAID functionality disabled so I can use it as a bunch of drives for software RAID-6. Like the Tempo cards, it has 6 2TB WD SATA drives attached which provides a second set of arrays. Performance really sucks, for some unknown reason, and I get lots of I/O error messages logged when the drives get busy. There appears to be no data corruption, just a lot of retries that slow things down significantly. The LSI web site has no info about the errors. The firmware is passing back I/O abort code 0403 and LSI Debug info related to channel 0 id 9. There are only 8 ports so I don't know which disk drive may or may not be causing problems. The SMART data on all disks shows no issues, although I tend to treat some SMART data with scepticism. I need to track this error down because my understanding is that the LSI controller chip has very good performance. Chuck ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Problem burning dvd's
I have a question on burning dvd iso's, using k3b. I have a sony dvd rw, and I've burned cd's with now problem, including iso's. The problem I'm having is, when I burn a dvd iso, k3b says it's a success, but then when I re-insert the disk, the drive tries to read the disk, but the read/write light just stays on, and the drive can't access the disk. Am I leaving a step out, or something? I burn cd iso's all the time. Thanks Jim ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Updating hardware clock from cron
--On Friday, March 04, 2011 3:04 PM -0500 Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane todd.dennis...@navy.mil wrote: Not if you are running ntp and it was able to sync, because ntpd activates a mode in the kernel that sets the hwclock every 11 minutes when ntp declares it got synced. Thanks, this is the part I was unaware of. So that obviates any need for a cron job. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - What are you looking forward to?
On 03/06/11 5:50 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: It's kind of funny since OracleVM*is* Xen, and it's counted as hardware partitioning :) OracleVM(tm) is a brand name now, being used for anything that remotely resembles virtualization, from Xen to Solaris Zones to hardware partitioning on the M series of big Sparc64 boxes. :-/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - What are you looking forward to?
On Sunday, March 06, 2011 05:28:13 pm John R Pierce wrote: On 03/06/11 5:50 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: It's kind of funny since OracleVM*is* Xen, and it's counted as hardware partitioning :) OracleVM(tm) is a brand name now, being used for anything that remotely resembles virtualization, from Xen to Solaris Zones to hardware partitioning on the M series of big Sparc64 boxes. :-/ Aehm, OracleVM for Sparc is the Sun LDom (Logical Domains) software and does not work on anything but T servers. M servers use Dynamic Domains, a completely different technology. Containers/Zones or Dynamic Domains don't have a OracleVM name... Either way, Oracle counts Oracle VM (for x86/x64) as a hard partitioning technology when you use cpu affinity (http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/virtualization/ovm- hardpart-167739.pdf)... Its just another case where Oracle is favoring their own products with licensing. Peter. -- Censorship: noun, circa 1591. a: Relief of the burden of independent thinking. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS and Marvell SAS/SATA drivers
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Chuck Munro chu...@seafoam.net wrote: On 03/06/2011 09:00 AM, compdoc wrote: Regarding the Marvell drivers, I had good luck with the 'sata_mv' driver in Scientific Linux 6 just yesterday, running a pair of 4-port PCIe-x4 Tempo 'Sonnet' controller cards. Are those the Mac/Windows Sonnet cards that go for less than $200? What kind of performance you seeing? Are you doing software raid on them? Yes, those are the cards which target Windows and OS-X, but they work fine on Linux as well. They use the Marvell 88SX series chips. They control 6 2TB WD Caviar Black drives, arranged as 5 drives in a RAID-6 array with one hot spare. 3 drives are connected to each of two cards. mdstat shows array re-sync speed is usually over 100 MBytes/sec although that tends to vary quite a bit over time. -- On 03/06/2011 09:00 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 03/05/11 7:01 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: areca works.. for SAS, I prefer LSI Logic. The Supermicro mobo I'm using (X8DAL-3) has an on-board LSI 1068E SAS/SATA controller chip, although I have the RAID functionality disabled so I can use it as a bunch of drives for software RAID-6. Like the Tempo cards, it has 6 2TB WD SATA drives attached which provides a second set of arrays. Performance really sucks, for some unknown reason, and I get lots of I/O error messages logged when the drives get busy. There appears to be no data corruption, just a lot of retries that slow things down significantly. The LSI web site has no info about the errors. The firmware is passing back I/O abort code 0403 and LSI Debug info related to channel 0 id 9. There are only 8 ports so I don't know which disk drive may or may not be causing problems. The SMART data on all disks shows no issues, although I tend to treat some SMART data with scepticism. I need to track this error down because my understanding is that the LSI controller chip has very good performance. I've had Linux integration issues with them for various reasons. Also, one LSI chipset may differ, a *LOT*, from the next LSI chipset in performance and integration. I like Adaptec for price/performance, and good Linux overall compatibility (including CentOS). Just don't order those fell off the truck Taiwan specials that are clearly Adaptec chipsets, but have actually had the numbers filed off. (Ran into those at a hardware vendor that specialized in promising BIG! NEW! FEATURES! but which had never tested the components in combination, and explaining that they needed to files 2 millimeters off the overlong and badly cut mounting plates or the controller cards would *keep* unseating was. not a good conversation.) Nico Kadel-Garcia ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Gnu Screen - terminal issues
The remote host's $TERM variable is in fact xterm. When I connect to the screen session the $TERM variable is 'screen'. Are you running screen locally or remotely? Remotely. My work machine is a laptop, which is not powered on all the time. Hence I use a remote box as a jumping-off point, and run my screen sessions there. Or you could write a script, scp it to the hosts you want to run it on (testing first, natch), and exec it: for host in hostlist; do scp myscript $host:.; done [fiddle around with tests or verification as necessary] for host in hostlist; do echo ** $host **; ssh $host ./myscript; done Yes, I do this quite a bit. But there are often times when I have to do interactive work, running different commands on various hosts. As I mentioned earlier, dsh (distributed ssh) is a very powerful tool for running multiple remote commands. Puppet, cfengine, and other tools may also be useful. Yes, thank you for the pointers. I'm familiar with both puppet and cfengine. The GNU screen sessions are mainly used during the build process, before a server has puppet or cfengine up and running. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Load balancing...
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: A warning: round robin can be problematical. Amen. Consider what happens with round-robin DNS when one host stops working. Round-robin DNS will hand out the address of the failed host just as often as it did when it was all working. Some clients (applications) will attempt to use another one of the IP addresses they get from the DNS, some won't. A load balancer checks the health of the hosts and doesn't^Wshouldn't route traffic to hosts that aren't serving requests. There are other considerations for round-robin DNS. As you'll want to make the TTL's very small, you must expect much more DNS traffic, so expect more load on the DNS. -- Charles Polisher ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS and Marvell SAS/SATA drivers
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: I like Adaptec for price/performance, and good Linux overall compatibility (including CentOS). Just don't order those fell off the truck Taiwan specials that are clearly Adaptec chipsets, but have actually had the numbers filed off. Adaptec is proud of their HostRAID technology that has a spotty record with Linux compatibility. The manufacturer's descriptions have led people to mistakenly think they bought a hardware RAID card when in fact the RAID functions are implemented in software. This approach has been dubbed fake RAID. It's not clear to me that this is a win compared to using the kernel's software RAID features. http://www.brentnorris.net/blog/archives/158 tells the sorry tale of a company whose products used to be a safe bet. The comments tend to confirm the sad state of affairs. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Fakeraid#Firmware.2Fdriver-based_RAID covers fake RAID. -- Charles Polisher ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kernel NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
Simon Matter wrote: Sometimes my server network connection on Linux goes down with short message in syslog saying: [localhost kernel] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out (or similar). By the way , I installed the CentOS 5.4 x86_64 bit and the kernel version was 2.6.18-164. Has anyone experienced this problem or is it the bug of the kernel ? It usually happens with problems on the physical layer. You network card may be bad, or the connection, or the other side of the ethernet wire, or a driver problem in the linux kernel. We don't have enough information from you so say more. I agree with your analysis. Had this very problem, it turned out to be due to a dodgy NIC. -- Charles Polisher ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Load balancing...
an interesting choice for low cost hardware load balancing appliances is coyote point http://www.coyotepoint.com/products/?gclid=CI6ri9jQu6cCFQbc4Aodmi1V4Q however for my purpose open and free HAProxy remains best choice!! On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Charles Polisher cpol...@surewest.net wrote: m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: A warning: round robin can be problematical. Amen. Consider what happens with round-robin DNS when one host stops working. Round-robin DNS will hand out the address of the failed host just as often as it did when it was all working. Some clients (applications) will attempt to use another one of the IP addresses they get from the DNS, some won't. A load balancer checks the health of the hosts and doesn't^Wshouldn't route traffic to hosts that aren't serving requests. There are other considerations for round-robin DNS. As you'll want to make the TTL's very small, you must expect much more DNS traffic, so expect more load on the DNS. -- Charles Polisher ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- GPG me!! gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Load balancing...
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote: however for my purpose open and free HAProxy remains best choice!! +1 for HAProxy; excellent piece of software. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Load balancing...
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote: however for my purpose open and free HAProxy remains best choice!! +1 for HAProxy; excellent piece of software. It really depends on your needs, if you are building a production ops environment then the last thing that you would want would be an unsupported/home grown solution. You need to consider the potential risks involved in implementing a poorly understood / virtually unsupported solution that in all likelihood only you would understand vs. a standard solution with an SLA behind it and an upgrade path going forward. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] BUG: soft lockup CPU stuck for 10seconds (Server went down)
Hello, Today my server stopped responding. i went to the console and on the screen there were a continuous loop of the following info shown on the screen: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [java:13959] and alot of other information. ii've took a screen shot of the info shown , you can find it under the following url: http://img585.imageshack.us/i/img00012201103070833.jpg/ and had to hard reset for it to be back up and running. i tried googling with no luck for direct relevant info. so hoping you can help out Thanks, --Roland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] BUG: soft lockup CPU stuck for 10seconds (Server went down)
Am 07.03.2011 08:31, schrieb Roland RoLaNd: Hello, Today my server stopped responding. i went to the console and on the screen there were a continuous loop of the following info shown on the screen: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [java:13959] and alot of other information. ii've took a screen shot of the info shown , you can find it under the following url: http://img585.imageshack.us/i/img00012201103070833.jpg/ and had to hard reset for it to be back up and running. i tried googling with no luck for direct relevant info. so hoping you can help out Thanks, --Roland A good reason why to run CentOS 5.4 (at least its kernel)? Running remotely vulnerable Oracle Java which can be affected by a DoS throug a web application? Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] BUG: soft lockup CPU stuck for 10seconds (Server went down)
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:31:42 +0200 Roland RoLaNd wrote: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [java:13959] i tried googling with no luck for direct relevant info. The first google result for the above string takes me here: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3582 Which in turn contains a reference that takes me here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484590 And it appears that this issue was fixed with kernel version 2.6.18-164. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ www.melvilletheatre.com www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] BUG: soft lockup CPU stuck for 10seconds (Server went down)
Am 07.03.2011 08:46, schrieb Frank Cox: On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:31:42 +0200 Roland RoLaNd wrote: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [java:13959] i tried googling with no luck for direct relevant info. The first google result for the above string takes me here: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3582 Which in turn contains a reference that takes me here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484590 And it appears that this issue was fixed with kernel version 2.6.18-164. Roland's screencopy shows a java process rather than openswan. Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
