Re: [CentOS-docs] Italian translation proposal

2011-09-18 Thread Ralph Angenendt
On 09/12/2011 06:10 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
 Hello,
 as I see @ http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0
 there isn't any italian translation link.
 If there is no guy already involved for this, I'm available to help
 with it for both CentOS 6.0 and upcoming 5.7.
 And for other content too.
 Let me know how to proceed if interested.

First you need a wiki account (FirstnameLastname, so GianlucaCecchi).
Then I need to add you to the correct ACL.

Then you can go ahead :)

So just say when you have your wiki account ready.

Cheers,

Ralph
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] New HOWTO Proposal: How to Configure Centralized Authentication on CentOS 6.0

2011-09-18 Thread Ralph Angenendt
On 09/13/2011 11:14 PM, Adrian Hall wrote:
 Ok - so holding the article on the inclusion of SSL/TLS - I'll update this
 group once I've got that information.  I also want to include access
 controls in the final document since it is an authentication server.
 
 Regarding sssd - I wouldn't hold the document for this.  I've just been
 doing some reading on the subject.  Even if it is deployed, that doesn't
 mean it is configured or started.  It looks like authconfig handles the vast
 majority of the work involved in authentication configuration in CentOS.
  I'm assuming anyone who wants to use sssd will know how to alter the
 authconfig to allow that.  If not, it can be reviewed in a different HOWTO.

Yeah, that looks like a good idea. Just ping us when you're ready for a
final review.

Regards,

Ralph

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Grub Installation for CentOS 5 and 6

2011-09-18 Thread Ralph Angenendt
On 09/18/2011 05:42 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:

 Very complete - probably too much so for Tips and Tricks:

Thanks for the review. I'll wait until the (small) issues you mentioned
are fixed.

Ralph
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] HOWTO: Configure a CentOS 6 Network Install Server - on my home page wiki

2011-09-18 Thread Adrian Hall
Yes - the edits were done.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 18, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Ralph Angenendt ralph.angene...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 09/13/2011 08:45 PM, Adrian Hall wrote:
 Thanks Phil - all excellent suggestions.  I will adjust within the next
 hour.
 
 Has that happened? (I know, I am a bit behind).
 
 Cheers,
 
 Ralph
 ___
 CentOS-docs mailing list
 CentOS-docs@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


[CentOS-virt] Having trouble starting more than 8 Xen guests

2011-09-18 Thread Scot P. Floess
All,

I've spent quite a few hours trying to figure this out to no avail...  I 
have two machines and the result is the same on both.  Additionally, 
each machine does not support full hardware virtualization...

I am able to create 8 VMs.  When attempting to create ninth VM, I get the 
following 
error:

Error: Device 51712 (vbd) could not be connected. /etc/xen/scripts/block 
failed; error detected.

To create the VMs, I use the command:

xm create [vm name]

My machine has 8 GB RAM and is an old school dual opteron box.

uname -a is:

Linux centos-host-2 2.6.18-274.3.1.el5.centos.plusxen #1 SMP Wed Sep 7 
06:25:54 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux


To be clear, I can shutdown any one of the 8 VMs and then run the ninth 
xm create - that VM will start...

I did some google'ing and from what I cn tell that error arises due to the 
lack of loop back devices (there being 8 by default)...

I've tried both using MAKEDEV (in my /etc/rc.local) to create a number of 
loop back devices and put max_loops in my grub,.conf file.  For example 
here is what I have in grub.conf now:

title CentOS (2.6.18-274.3.1.el5.centos.plusxen)
 root (hd0,0)
 kernel /xen.gz-2.6.18-274.3.1.el5.centos.plus
 module /vmlinuz-2.6.18-274.3.1.el5.centos.plusxen ro root=LABEL=/ 
max_loop=64
 module /initrd-2.6.18-274.3.1.el5.centos.plusxen.img


Due to wrapping, max_loop is actually on the module /vmlinuz- line...

I also tried to put max_loop on the kernel line as well...

As I mentioned above, I also created the loop back devices from 
/etc/rc.local like so:

/sbin/MAKEDEV -d /dev -m 64 loop

And, once I can log in to the machine, I do see everything in /dev (for 
example /dev/loop0 to /dev/loop64)

Has anyone else had this problem?  If so, how did you resolve it


Thanks ahead of time!


Scot P. Floess RHCT  (Certificate Number 605010084735240)
Chief Architect FlossWare  http://sourceforge.net/projects/flossware
http://flossware.sourceforge.net
https://github.com/organizations/FlossWare
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-18 Thread Keith Roberts
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote:

 To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
 From: Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense
 
 Hi,

 On 09/18/2011 12:39 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
 A lot of people responded related to media, and that's because it
 happens. As in the end the OP confirms that.

 That is true, and I apologise. Guess I must just be really 
 lucky not having had a media issue in many years now.

 - KB

That's accepted by me Karanbir. Thanks for being brave 
enough to apologize in public. It was not a statement of 
opinion, but a very terse and concise question to point 
the OP in what I considered to be a possibility.

Reason being I had a very similar experience with the Fedora
Electronics Lab respin Live CD earlier this year.

Kind Regards,

Keith

-
Websites:
http://www.karsites.net
http://www.php-debuggers.net
http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk

All email addresses are challenge-response protected with
TMDA [http://tmda.net]
-
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-18 Thread Always Learning

On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 08:29 +0100, Keith Roberts wrote:

 Reason being I had a very similar experience with the Fedora
 Electronics Lab respin Live CD earlier this year.

I always buy 386 and x64 DVDs of each Centos sub-version. About 3-4
months ago I tried to install Centos from DVDs and the disks had read
errors. I then tried to install from the DVDs of the previous Centos
version but those DVDs also had read errors. Luckily I successfully
installed Centos from the previous, previous version.

Then I changed my supplier of Centos DVDs and ordered fresh DVDs.  Now
Centos 5.7 is out, I shall be ordering 386 and x64 DVDs from the new
supplier despite upgrading via KB's CR repository.

Regards,

Paul.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 6.1 Update request

2011-09-18 Thread Timo Neuvonen
 Just ordered a Lenovo TS130. I think there are some issues with the Intel
 graphics with 6.0 and I saw where they are resolved in 6.1. Hopefully 6.1
 can be released soon. If not, I can install Scientific Linux temporarily.

 Fingers crossed!!

 Or, just grab the intel xorg driver rpm from SL, and libdrm, and one other
 package, the nouveau rpm.  It doesn't make sense to go all the way over to 
 SL
 if you plan on coming straight back.


I simply installed CentOS 6.0, downloaded kernel from SL6.1 repo, and 
installed it. Basically this is what was needed to make Intel graphics work, 
I think there were 1-2 other rpms I needed to upgrade too to fix 
dependencies, but this was easy to notice during the kernel install.

This way the system automatically will roll back to pure CentOS when newer 
CentOS 6.1 rpms will be available.

--
TiN 


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos-release 5.7 srpm where?

2011-09-18 Thread me
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote:

 On 09/15/2011 01:17 PM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
 I realize everyone is busy but it would be nice to have at least the srpms
 that were specific to the centos project with the release.

 Are you able to find what you are looking for in Vault/5.7 ?

Yes, Thank You.


 ( more details on what the thinking behind this is, coming shortly )

Never thought to look there but I think I see what you are doing. :-)

Regards,

-- 
Tom m...@tdiehl.org Spamtrap address
me...@tdiehl.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Refocusing the list; was: centos product specification

2011-09-18 Thread R P Herrold
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote:

 I am unaware of ever making those comments !

Check your file copy of your email to me of 25 Aug.  I won't 
engage in a battle of semantics with an anonymous troll

To all:

As a matter of logistics, we are putting some new permissions 
in place to permit the stewards of the CentOS resources to 
quell the flood of off topic matter.  The protocol will 
probably be first a private word to repeated instigator of 
noise off the mailing list, and then a silent moderation of 
that person; there is also the capacity to close down further 
posts on a subject line in Mailman, and we may use that as 
well

I considered and proposed a formal and public nomination and 
voting system but this was probably geeky technical overkill. 
Also it would have required material coding to get up and 
running, to address what is, in the end, simply sustained bad 
behaviour by a few serial offenders.  We'll be trying what in 
already in Mailman first

I'm not happy about this moderation, but as one of the other 
stewards said:

 some of these conversations are really getting out of hand, 
 the level of OT isnt even funny anymore. People seem to have 
 descended into a social chatter list attitude rather than 
 something that is topical and meant to be a collection of 
 people focused on a specific interest.

 I'm all for putting a mod flag on these guys, specially for 
 the guys who have been on the list for a while

and I am much more unhappy with the hijacking of the list for 
personal entertainment and trolling sport

Thank you for bearing with us as we steer the list back to 
addressing CentOS usage specific matter

-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Refocusing the list; was: centos product specification

2011-09-18 Thread Always Learning

On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 11:41 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:

 On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote:
 
  I am unaware of ever making those comments !
 
 Check your file copy of your email to me of 25 Aug.  I won't 
 engage in a battle of semantics with an anonymous troll


From: 
Always Learning
cen...@u61.u22.net
  To: 
R P Herrold
herr...@centos.org
 Subject: 
Re: centos] what
happened to
rpmforge?
Date: 
Fri, 26 Aug 2011
01:52:25 +0100




I work longer hours than you, usually 7 days a week. I post for a wee
break.

My words are nothing like what you alleged.

Paul.
Anyone Interested in a Centos+Chat list? Reply privately please.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Depsolving errors whilst upgrading Centos 5.6 - 5.7

2011-09-18 Thread Dave Cross
I have a dedicated server from 11 (http://1and1.co.uk/). A 'yum list
updates' today showed me that the 5.7 update was available (it's
probably been there for a while, I don't check that often).

But running 'yum update' gives the following error:

Running rpm_check_debug
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
kernel(rhel5_fs_proc_ga) is needed by (installed) kmod-xfs-xen-0.4-2.x86_64
kernel(rhel5_arch_x86_64_kernel_ga) is needed by (installed)
kmod-xfs-xen-0.4-2.x86_64
kernel(rhel5_fs_partitions_ga) is needed by (installed)
kmod-xfs-xen-0.4-2.x86_64
kernel(rhel5_vmlinux_ga) is needed by (installed) kmod-xfs-xen-0.4-2.x86_64
kernel(rhel5_kernel_u2) is needed by (installed) kmod-xfs-xen-0.4-2.x86_64
kernel(rhel5_fs_u2) is needed by (installed) kmod-xfs-xen-0.4-2.x86_64
kernel(rhel5_drivers_xen_core_ga) is needed by (installed)
kmod-xfs-xen-0.4-2.x86_64
kernel(rhel5_block_u2) is needed by (installed) kmod-xfs-xen-0.4-2.x86_64
kernel(rhel5_kernel_ga) is needed by (installed) kmod-xfs-xen-0.4-2.x86_64
kernel(rhel5_security_ga) is needed by (installed) kmod-xfs-xen-0.4-2.x86_64
kernel(rhel5_block_ga) is needed by (installed) kmod-xfs-xen-0.4-2.x86_64
kernel(rhel5_kernel_module_ga) is needed by (installed)
kmod-xfs-xen-0.4-2.x86_64
kernel(rhel5_fs_ga) is needed by (installed) kmod-xfs-xen-0.4-2.x86_64
kernel(rhel5_mm_ga) is needed by (installed) kmod-xfs-xen-0.4-2.x86_64
kernel(rhel5_lib_ga) is needed by (installed) kmod-xfs-xen-0.4-2.x86_64
kernel(rhel5_mm_u2) is needed by (installed) kmod-xfs-xen-0.4-2.x86_64
Complete!
(1, [u'Please report this error in
http://bugs.centos.org/set_project.php?project_id=16ref=http://bugs.centos.org/bug_report_page.php?category=yum'])

I haven't reported the bug yet. I thought I'd see if anyone here had
seen anything similar first.

Cheers,

Dave...

-- 
Dave Cross :: d...@dave.org.uk
http://dave.org.uk/
@davorg
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Can't boot Centos6 ext4 partition from GAG bootloader

2011-09-18 Thread Maurice Batey
Have just installed Centos-6 from a Linux Format DVD.
   The install went smoothly, although the installer inisisted that
the root partition had to be formatted ext4.

When my GAG boot loader tried to boot from that root partition,  
it was unable do so.

Elsewhere I read that GAG cannot boot from an ext4 parititon.

I there any way tp persuade Centos-6 to use an ext3 root partition?
-- 
/\/\aurice 
(Retired in Surrey, UK) 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Depsolving errors whilst upgrading Centos 5.6 - 5.7

2011-09-18 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/18/11 10:32 AM, Dave Cross wrote:
 I have a dedicated server from 11 (http://1and1.co.uk/). A 'yum list
 updates' today showed me that the 5.7 update was available (it's
 probably been there for a while, I don't check that often).
 

does that server use cpanel or webmin or something?  many of those muck 
with the system package lists such that yum update is not reliable.



-- 
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Depsolving errors whilst upgrading Centos 5.6 - 5.7

2011-09-18 Thread Dave Cross
On 18 September 2011 18:46, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
 On 09/18/11 10:32 AM, Dave Cross wrote:
 I have a dedicated server from 11 (http://1and1.co.uk/). A 'yum list
 updates' today showed me that the 5.7 update was available (it's
 probably been there for a while, I don't check that often).
 

 does that server use cpanel or webmin or something?  many of those muck
 with the system package lists such that yum update is not reliable.

Yes. It uses Plesk Parallels. I've done this a few times and I've
never seen this problem before.

Maybe I'll just have to rebuilt the server. In which case I'll wait
for them to have Centos 6 available.

Dave...

-- 
Dave Cross :: d...@dave.org.uk
http://dave.org.uk/
@davorg
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Reinstall boot lodear.

2011-09-18 Thread Ashish Shaligram
Hi,

I have install 2 os, windows  centos6.0 x86. and after format of windows os
cent os bootlodear not showing, how can i active my cent os with healp of
centos dvd ?

Thank You

-- 
*Regards,*
Ashish A. Shaigram
All-Tech Computer Solutions
9722537772
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 6.1 Update request

2011-09-18 Thread Thomas Dukes
 

 -Original Message-
 From: centos-boun...@centos.org 
 [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Timo Neuvonen
 Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 8:27 AM
 To: centos@centos.org
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] 6.1 Update request
 
  Just ordered a Lenovo TS130. I think there are some issues 
 with the 
  Intel graphics with 6.0 and I saw where they are resolved in 6.1. 
  Hopefully 6.1 can be released soon. If not, I can install 
 Scientific Linux temporarily.
 
  Fingers crossed!!
 
  Or, just grab the intel xorg driver rpm from SL, and 
 libdrm, and one 
  other package, the nouveau rpm.  It doesn't make sense to 
 go all the 
  way over to SL if you plan on coming straight back.
 
 
 I simply installed CentOS 6.0, downloaded kernel from SL6.1 repo, and 
 installed it. Basically this is what was needed to make Intel 
 graphics work, 
 I think there were 1-2 other rpms I needed to upgrade too to fix 
 dependencies, but this was easy to notice during the kernel install.
 
 This way the system automatically will roll back to pure 
 CentOS when newer 
 CentOS 6.1 rpms will be available.

Thanks!!

Installed the SL kernel and firmware packages. WOW!! That made a huge
difference.

Thanks!!

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] sarg

2011-09-18 Thread madu...@gmail.com
I am running squid + sarg, how can I change the ip-address in the
generated report into username? The users are free to surf the web
anonymously, no need  to provide a login or any authentication to the
proxy.


Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sarg

2011-09-18 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/18/11 2:17 PM, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
 I am running squid + sarg, how can I change the ip-address in the
 generated report into username? The users are free to surf the web
 anonymously, no need  to provide a login or any authentication to the
 proxy.

without requiring a proxy login, how would the squid server know who is 
running the browser at a given IP address to do this?




-- 
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Reinstall boot lodear.

2011-09-18 Thread Jake Shipton
On 09/18/2011 07:27 PM, Ashish Shaligram wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I have install 2 os, windows  centos6.0 x86. and after format of
 windows os cent os bootlodear not showing, how can i active my cent os
 with healp of centos dvd ?
 
 Thank You
 
 -- 
 *Regards,*
 Ashish A. Shaigram
 All-Tech Computer Solutions
 9722537772
 
 
 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello,

There is a CentOS Wiki article regarding this.

http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/ReinstallGRUB

That should help you on your way to fixing your bootloader (assuming
your using grub) :-)

-- 
Jake
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] javaWS under firefox on CentOS 5.6 fails to launch sound

2011-09-18 Thread Rob Kampen

Hi List,
Before I spend hours chasing this - my initial google search seems to 
indicate that javaWS and JNLP apps with sound do not work on CentOS 
systems. The developer's website says they support :-


*Linux*

*Supported OS’s and recommended versions of Java*

   * Linux
 o openSUSE 11 (64 bit with 64 bit JVM)
 o Ubuntu 9.10 (64 bit with 64 bit JVM)
   * Pentium III 1 GHz processor
   * Sun Java 1.5.0_17 or Sun Java 1.6.0_12 or greater is recommended

I have Oracle's java v1.6.0_26 installed - the java app opens up and 
appears to be functioning fine, however the wizard for setting up the 
sound, even though it recognizes my sound card fails to actually play 
any sound.

Running latest 5.7
[rkampen@robsws ~]$ uname -a
Linux robsws.ndgonline.net 2.6.18-238.19.1.el5.centos.plus #1 SMP Mon 
Jul 18 10:05:09 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

[rkampen@robsws ~]$ rpm -qa |grep firefox
firefox-3.6.18-1.el5.centos.x86_64
Sound from within other browser based apps (flash etc) work just fine.
Anyone got a javaWS with sound application working on CentOS?
TIA - Rob
attachment: rkampen.vcf___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sarg

2011-09-18 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, September 19, 2011 06:34 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
 On 09/18/11 2:17 PM, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
 I am running squid + sarg, how can I change the ip-address in the
 generated report into username? The users are free to surf the web
 anonymously, no need  to provide a login or any authentication to the
 proxy.

 without requiring a proxy login, how would the squid server know who is
 running the browser at a given IP address to do this?


It might be possible with AD + kerberos/ntlm to do it in a SLO 
manner...so not anonymous but also without requiring users to login or 
authenticate themselves.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] ekiga

2011-09-18 Thread hadi motamedi
Dear All
I have installed Asterisk on my centos 5.0 and I have two other centos
6.0 and centos 5.6 with ekiga sip client. The centos 6.0 can make
successful sip calls but centos 5.6 cannot. Among the Asterisk logs, I
found that the centos 6.0 has ekiga 3.2.6 but centos 5.6 has ekiga
2.0.2 . How can I install/upgrade my older ekiga?
Thank you
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos