Re: [CentOS-docs] Italian translation proposal
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote: [snip] I don't understand the issue - just use the edit button on top of that page to continue? [snip] I get an error page with: You are not allowed to edit this page. Try now. Cheers, Ralph ___ Ok, I succeeded in creating my home page... When I saved it, I still continue to see the edit buttons to edit again if I like Instead if I go to the work in progress italian release notes page http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0/Italian I can't see the edit buttons at all so I don't know how to further edit it... The first time when the page was created from the TranslationTemplate I saw the edit buttons at top, but after the first save operation I wasn't able to see them any more One question. Inside the current release notes page the hyper link for localizations (eg German) points to: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0/German while if I understood correctly the general rules for localization, it should be http://wiki.centos.org/de/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0/ So what is the correct approach? Is it the release notes an exception..? ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Italian translation proposal
On 09/29/2011 11:55 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote: [snip] I don't understand the issue - just use the edit button on top of that page to continue? [snip] I get an error page with: You are not allowed to edit this page. Try now. Cheers, Ralph ___ Ok, I succeeded in creating my home page... When I saved it, I still continue to see the edit buttons to edit again if I like Instead if I go to the work in progress italian release notes page http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0/Italian I can't see the edit buttons at all so I don't know how to further edit it... The first time when the page was created from the TranslationTemplate I saw the edit buttons at top, but after the first save operation I wasn't able to see them any more One question. Inside the current release notes page the hyper link for localizations (eg German) points to: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0/German while if I understood correctly the general rules for localization, it should be http://wiki.centos.org/de/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0/ So what is the correct approach? Is it the release notes an exception..? Include this line, below Traduzioni di queste Note di Rilascio sono disponibili in diverse lingue : [[Include(Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0,,from=##begin-translations, to=##end-translations)]] ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Italian translation proposal
On 09/29/2011 12:06 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: [[Include(Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0,,from=##begin-translations, to=##end-translations)]] I noticed that you were not making use of any of the booksmarks existing in the English version of the RN, so I modified your translation in order to use them ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Italian translation proposal
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: On 09/29/2011 12:06 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: [[Include(Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0,,from=##begin-translations, to=##end-translations)]] I noticed that you were not making use of any of the booksmarks existing in the English version of the RN, so I modified your translation in order to use them The problem is that I only applied a few modifications just for test of using the wiki, then saved, then I was not able to edit the page anymore... When I log in with my GianlucaCecchi login and I go to http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0/Italian I see the page but as a normal user, I don't see the control button at top, that I instead see when I point to: http://wiki.centos.org/GianlucaCecchi (edit, edit(GUI).) I don't know if it is a matter of ACL definition or what... Until this is fixed I can't put any additional change into the page.. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Italian translation proposal
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: [snip] When I log in with my GianlucaCecchi login and I go to http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0/Italian I see the page but as a normal user, I don't see the control button at top, that I instead see when I point to: http://wiki.centos.org/GianlucaCecchi (edit, edit(GUI).) I don't know if it is a matter of ACL definition or what... Until this is fixed I can't put any additional change into the page.. strangely I have the power to edit your translation page (Romanian) and the German page, but no way for the Italian one... perhaps because it is a new page and not an already existent one? or is it just the italian phrase that defaults to generate intrinsic inefficiency (see our government ;-) BTW: I see now that the Italian link appears, but due to its brokenness in contents, it would be preferable not to have it until I can modify the italian page... why so complicated to contribute efficiently? ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Italian translation proposal
On 09/29/2011 04:13 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: [snip] When I log in with my GianlucaCecchi login and I go to http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0/Italian I see the page but as a normal user, I don't see the control button at top, that I instead see when I point to: http://wiki.centos.org/GianlucaCecchi (edit, edit(GUI).) I don't know if it is a matter of ACL definition or what... Until this is fixed I can't put any additional change into the page.. strangely I have the power to edit your translation page (Romanian) and the German page, but no way for the Italian one... perhaps because it is a new page and not an already existent one? or is it just the italian phrase that defaults to generate intrinsic inefficiency (see our government ;-) BTW: I see now that the Italian link appears, I've added it but due to its brokenness in contents, it would be preferable not to have it until I can modify the italian page... I've commented the link to your page. (I cannot fix ACLs, we have to wait for Ralph ) ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] I would like to contribute to the Wiki
I would be glad to work with Manuel Wolfshant on this. Manuel, please let me know if you use any instant messenger client. Maybe that way we can communicate faster and better on this subject using our native language... Also, after reading your answer, I want to add a note to your opinion about Romanian CentOS users not reading romanian translations: Most of the time, I use google to search for specific answers. I bet, more romanian wiki pages will add more results on google.ro searches, naturally driving up more readers in our native language. Of course I may be wrong. By the other way, for me, translating the wiki will certainly improve my CentOS knowledge. I see this as a way both to learn for myself and doing something positive for the comunity in the same time. I also have a proposal about the way we should write from now on: I think we must use romanian diacritics like șțâăî in our translations. This is the correct way to write romanian. I see all the wiki pages are using UTF-8 character set so there will be no technical problems with that. Other from writing faster, i see no reason not to use our language specific diacritics. Also if you agree with that Manuel my next step will be to translate the following page: http://wiki.centos.org/Documentation into http://wiki.centos.org/ro/Documentation I am requesting the rights to create/edit that page.___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] I would like to contribute to the Wiki
On 09/29/2011 04:49 PM, Madalin Grigore-Enescu wrote: I would be glad to work with Manuel Wolfshant on this. Manuel, please let me know if you use any instant messenger client. Maybe that way we can communicate faster and better on this subject using our native language... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ManuelWolfshant Also, after reading your answer, I want to add a note to your opinion about Romanian CentOS users not reading romanian translations: Most of the time, I use google to search for specific answers. I bet, more romanian wiki pages will add more results on google.ro searches, naturally driving up more readers in our native language. Of course I may be wrong. I am involved in the RLUG community since it was created ( '98) and most of the people I know would rather read the original. But if you have the time to invest in translations, maybe this will change. By the other way, for me, translating the wiki will certainly improve my CentOS knowledge. I see this as a way both to learn for myself and doing something positive for the comunity in the same time. I also have a proposal about the way we should write from now on: I think we must use romanian diacritics like șțâăî in our translations. This is the correct way to write romanian. I see all the wiki pages are using UTF-8 character set so there will be no technical problems with that. Other from writing faster, i see no reason not to use our language specific diacritics. There is a long debate around that. As long as a whole page is written in one style only ( either with diacritics everywhere or with none ) you have my support. Personally I usually avoid diacritics because in many cases I had bad experience when reading pages which included them, due to missing fonts on the rendering side. Not to mention the large use of wrong characters ( ş instead of the correct one, ș) Also if you agree with that Manuel my next step will be to translate the following page: http://wiki.centos.org/Documentation into http://wiki.centos.org/ro/Documentation Sure, by all means. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2011:1345 CentOS 5 x86_64 openldap Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:1345
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1345.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
e64cca127bbb4fcf22ff6463117eab57
compat-openldap-2.3.43_2.2.29-12.el5_7.9.i386.rpm
58e5b3e51e20806547aa73fa7204ab9e
compat-openldap-2.3.43_2.2.29-12.el5_7.9.x86_64.rpm
9c83aa8b9265cda78223b12a78ca0078 openldap-2.3.43-12.el5_7.9.i386.rpm
a0f897e668fd4cfb4334681e988bdc53 openldap-2.3.43-12.el5_7.9.x86_64.rpm
e6fd687d433ff74f707e224dee47d86a openldap-clients-2.3.43-12.el5_7.9.x86_64.rpm
6edcfaf89c7f250be0a043a9047d00a4 openldap-devel-2.3.43-12.el5_7.9.i386.rpm
3ec857d25d95d2e418dec463617f896e openldap-devel-2.3.43-12.el5_7.9.x86_64.rpm
09995e0d631ce4f7a4244696eaef2671 openldap-servers-2.3.43-12.el5_7.9.x86_64.rpm
3d177da7553463ad8aa14ed950ac670e
openldap-servers-overlays-2.3.43-12.el5_7.9.x86_64.rpm
7ef8bbacd9e05b9b773d4cba4573cff6
openldap-servers-sql-2.3.43-12.el5_7.9.x86_64.rpm
Source:
261e46fdbb87df98f3f51296581a9caf openldap-2.3.43-12.el5_7.9.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2011:1345 CentOS 5 i386 openldap Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:1345
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1345.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
e64cca127bbb4fcf22ff6463117eab57
compat-openldap-2.3.43_2.2.29-12.el5_7.9.i386.rpm
9c83aa8b9265cda78223b12a78ca0078 openldap-2.3.43-12.el5_7.9.i386.rpm
e17187d3ab9395b2ee149457260c0418 openldap-clients-2.3.43-12.el5_7.9.i386.rpm
6edcfaf89c7f250be0a043a9047d00a4 openldap-devel-2.3.43-12.el5_7.9.i386.rpm
1492f29d1a4bff21464694671102cc42 openldap-servers-2.3.43-12.el5_7.9.i386.rpm
98126b6f1c17098d4e830740515406f5
openldap-servers-overlays-2.3.43-12.el5_7.9.i386.rpm
6defffc175c3b1e0c045610d3fd05f61
openldap-servers-sql-2.3.43-12.el5_7.9.i386.rpm
Source:
261e46fdbb87df98f3f51296581a9caf openldap-2.3.43-12.el5_7.9.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1341 Critical CentOS 4 i386 firefox - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:1341 firefox security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1341.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/firefox-3.6.23-1.el4.centos.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/firefox-3.6.23-1.el4.centos.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 i386 installations by running the command: yum update firefox Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpG2OU1oKTLd.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1341 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 firefox - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:1341 firefox security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1341.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/firefox-3.6.23-1.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/*.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update firefox Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpsJMleAdUqI.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1343 Critical CentOS 4 i386 thunderbird - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:1343 thunderbird security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1343.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/thunderbird-1.5.0.12-44.el4.centos.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/thunderbird-1.5.0.12-44.el4.centos.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 i386 installations by running the command: yum update thunderbird Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpVkFV4UOBiY.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1343 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 thunderbird - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:1343 thunderbird security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1343.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/thunderbird-1.5.0.12-44.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/thunderbird-1.5.0.12-44.el4.centos.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update thunderbird Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpIXrSYceIsZ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1344 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 seamonkey - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:1344 seamonkey security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1344.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-76.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-76.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-76.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.9-76.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-js-debugger-1.0.9-76.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-mail-1.0.9-76.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-76.el4.centos.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update seamonkey Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgp4jVTBhJvH2.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1344 Critical CentOS 4 i386 seamonkey - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:1344 seamonkey security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1344.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-76.el4.centos.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-76.el4.centos.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-76.el4.centos.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.9-76.el4.centos.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-js-debugger-1.0.9-76.el4.centos.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-mail-1.0.9-76.el4.centos.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-76.el4.centos.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 i386 installations by running the command: yum update seamonkey Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpCF032S8WJy.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-virt] Second VM cannot use the network.
Hi, I started to use libvirt and kvm yesterday. The first VM works great. Today I made another VM, same configuration as before. But its network just did not work. The guest cannot even get a dhcp ip. The network is NAT mode. The first VM got internal ip correctly. The command I made the VM is: virt-install -nzabbix1 -r2048 --vcpus=2 -c/var/lib/libvirt/images/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-netinstall.iso --os-type=linux --os-variant=rhel6 --disk vol=kvmguests/zabbix1 --vnc -v --virt-type=kvm --check-cpu --prompt --arch=x86_64 --vnclisten=0.0.0.0 --noautoconsole --noreboot --autostart What should I do? -- 竹密岂妨流水过 山高哪阻野云飞 ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-es] Grabar Iso CentOS 6
Buenas... ya baje la iso como en tres oportunidades y no logro quemarla en un DVD.. me dice que exede el Tamaño... aunque la imagen dice que pesa 4,4GB la iso que baje es la : i386-bin y con md5sum , me da correcto... osea me perdi de algo? la intento Grabar desde Linux con K3b.. o Brasero... y no es la primera vez que quemo una ISO... la Grabadora anda bien... lo intente en la Notebook y en la Pc de escritorio con la version Live... no tuve problemas... Saludos y Gracias Walter www.infoquil.com.ar ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Grabar Iso CentOS 6
El 29/09/11 11:30, Maykel Franco Hernández escribió: Yo probaría ahora con el nero de evaluación para linux y comentas. Un saludo. On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:27:19 -0300, Walter wrote: Buenas... ya baje la iso como en tres oportunidades y no logro quemarla en un DVD.. me dice que exede el Tamaño... aunque la imagen dice que pesa 4,4GB la iso que baje es la : i386-bin y con md5sum , me da correcto... osea me perdi de algo? la intento Grabar desde Linux con K3b.. o Brasero... y no es la primera vez que quemo una ISO... la Grabadora anda bien... lo intente en la Notebook y en la Pc de escritorio con la version Live... no tuve problemas... Saludos y Gracias Walter www.infoquil.com.ar [1] ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org [2] http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es [3] Links: -- [1] http://www.infoquil.com.ar [2] mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org [3] http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Nop.. Tampoco. alguno que haya grabado la version i386? ahora mismo estoy bajando la version 64Bits y veo que esta viene en 2 DVD -- Walter www.infoquil.com.ar ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Grabar Iso CentOS 6
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:01:25 -0300 From: iqsiste...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Grabar Iso CentOS 6 El 29/09/11 11:30, Maykel Franco Hernández escribió: Yo probaría ahora con el nero de evaluación para linux y comentas. Un saludo. On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:27:19 -0300, Walter wrote: Buenas... ya baje la iso como en tres oportunidades y no logro quemarla en un DVD.. me dice que exede el Tamaño... aunque la imagen dice que pesa 4,4GB la iso que baje es la : i386-bin y con md5sum , me da correcto... osea me perdi de algo? la intento Grabar desde Linux con K3b.. o Brasero... y no es la primera vez que quemo una ISO... la Grabadora anda bien... lo intente en la Notebook y en la Pc de escritorio con la version Live... no tuve problemas... Saludos y Gracias Walter www.infoquil.com.ar [1] ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org [2] http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es [3] Links: -- [1] http://www.infoquil.com.ar [2] mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org [3] http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Nop.. Tampoco. alguno que haya grabado la version i386? ahora mismo estoy bajando la version 64Bits y veo que esta viene en 2 DVD -- Walter www.infoquil.com.ar ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Alguna vez tuve el mismo problema con Fedora 13 y se solucionó bajándola de otro enlace y en otra computadora. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Grabar Iso CentOS 6
2011/9/29 Ernesto Pérez Estévez cen...@nuestroserver.com El jue, 29-09-2011 a las 11:27 -0300, Walter escribió: Buenas... ya baje la iso como en tres oportunidades y no logro quemarla en un DVD.. me dice que exede el Tamaño... aunque la imagen dice que pesa 4,4GB Ah, para eso están las release notes http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0/Spanish#head-2dcfcc57bdaab2dcb3bcd22cbb4bcc0877e1834d El DVD para i386 es un poco mas largo de lo normal para un DVD+R. Este puede ser gravado (SIC) en un DVD-R. a propósito, todavía recuerdo con añoranza cómo discutimos en esta lista la traducción al Casetellano de la versión 5, recuerdan? Realmente la traducción en Español actual tiene los defectos que intentamos evitar, se agradece al que lo hizo, pero gravado.. al cuánto %? Porque gravado es cuando se pone un gravamen, un impuesto. saludos epe la iso que baje es la : i386-bin y con md5sum , me da correcto... osea me perdi de algo? la intento Grabar desde Linux con K3b.. o Brasero... y no es la primera vez que quemo una ISO... la Grabadora anda bien... lo intente en la Notebook y en la Pc de escritorio con la version Live... no tuve problemas... Saludos y Gracias Walter www.infoquil.com.ar ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Interesante información yo no lo sabía, gracias por compartirlo, porque yo tampoco hubiera leído las notas de la versión ¡Jajaja!. Un valioso recordatorio, leer siempre las notas. Éxitos, -- Carlos Sura.- http://www.carlossura.com/ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] sendmail en web server
El 28/09/2011 03:55 p.m., Ernesto Pérez Estévez escribió: pidele al servidor smarthost, que autorice para que envíes desde esa ip. es una variante saludos epe Gracias por la sugerencia. Pude comprobar que desde algunos sitios en mi servidor, sí se envian mails correctamente. Aparentemente tengo un problema con el nombre que tiene o utiliza mi servidor (desde algunos sitios) para conectarse con el servidor de correo. En estos casos se delega la tarea al servicio sendmail. Revisé las distintas opciones MASQUERADE que están en la configuración de sendmail. Me cuesta entender la documentación de sendmail, por lo que comencé a probar y logré que funcione activando: MASQUERADE_AS(dominio.del.que.dependo) FEATURE(masquerade_envelope) FEATURE(masquerade_entire_domain) MASQUERADE_DOMAIN(localhost) MASQUERADE_DOMAIN(localhost.localdomain) Saludos -- --- Fernando Ariel Martinez --- Bahía Blanca - Argentina --- ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Estupenda web de configuración Centos 6
Hola Arturo. Gracias por el aporte, parece una muy buena página. Saludos El 29 de septiembre de 2011 01:31, Carlos Sura carlos.su...@googlemail.comescribió: 2011/9/28 Arturo Limón art...@susetic.com A ver si tengo un rato y me puedo meter con ello esta semana. Ya contaré qué tal me va la cosa. Saludos, Arturo. El 28 de septiembre de 2011 23:01, Fernando Martinez fmarti...@uns.edu.arescribió: El 28/09/2011 05:33 p.m., Arturo Limón escribió: Me falta configurar samba como controlador de dominio sobre LDAP; ya veremos que tal sale. Gracias por el aporte, interesante sitio web. Agradeceré nos compartas los avances para configurar samba como controlador de dominio sobre LDAP. Saludos Fernando M. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Se agradece el aporte, voy a revisarlo y comento. Saludos -- Carlos Sura.- http://www.carlossura.com/ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- _(@^@)__ Luciano Andres Chiarotto Celular:02652-15655153; San Luis (Capital). Técnico Universitario en Microprocesadores El saber es la parte principal de la felicidad. Sócrates (470-399 a. C.); filósofo griego. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Consultas sobre bloqueo y eliminación de SPAM y antivirus.
Buen día, Verán, tengo un par de consultas que desee solventar, y es que, tal vez alguno de ustedes me puede ayudar a solventarlas: - ¿Hay alguna forma en que pueda bloquear direcciones web en Postfix sin utilizar spamassassin o amavis? Si es favorable ¿Cómo? ¿Una guia? - Quiero utilizar amavisd y spamassassin sin un panel de control en mi servidor ni interfaz gráfica ¿es posible? quiero que verifique actualmente cada correo que entre y busque SPAM. - ¿Hay alguna manera de bloquear la entrada de correos HTML y permitir el acceso solo a correos en modo texto? Si es así ¿Cómo? y ¿como enviar un mensaje informándole al usuario -que me envío un correo HTML, que solo acepto texto-? -el mensaje debe ser automático obviamente. Le agradecería al que pueda y desee ayudarme, Éxitos, -- Carlos Sura.- www.carlossura.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Estupenda web de configuración Centos 6
Arturo muchas gracias, que es un buen material. lo voy a trabajar paso a
paso y luego te cuento que tal me va
El 28 de septiembre de 2011 15:33, Arturo Limón art...@susetic.comescribió:
Hola,
He encontrado una web con un montón de información para configurar
funciones
en Centos 6
http://www.server-world.info/en/note?os=CentOS_6p=download
Lo que he probado a configurar según estas instrucciones funciona, salvo un
pequeño detalle en phpldapadmin, y es que en config.php hay que suprimir
(poner como comentario) la línea que dice:
$servers-setValue('login', 'attr', 'uid');
... o phpldapadmin no te reconoce usuario y contraseña.
Me falta configurar samba como controlador de dominio sobre LDAP; ya
veremos
que tal sale.
Espero que os sea de interés.
Saludos,
Arturo.
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
--
*Aldemar Valencia R.
Cel 320-6127420
301-6000829*
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Estupenda web de configuración Centos 6
Me alegro de que lo encontréis de interés. Dentro de que no entra casi en explicaciones sobre el porqué de cada paso de configuración, creo que añadiendo o ampliando tales explicaciones (quienes tengan nivel para hacerlo, lo que por desgracia no es mi caso en gran parte de ellas) más las experiencias que podamos añadir nosotros, puede llegarse a un interesante manual-resumen de configuración de Centos 6. A ver si este fin de semana saco tiempo y puedo cacharrearlo un poco más, que está semana la estoy teniendo muy ocupada. Saludos, ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] (sin asunto)
buenas , ¿como puedo hacer que mi servidor proxy squid no acepte proxys hijos? creo que hay algun usuario que esta usando mi servidor squid como parent ,¿como puedo deshablitar esto? gracias. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] squid proxy en centos
buenas , ¿como puedo hacer que mi servidor proxy squid no acepte proxys hijos? creo que hay algun usuario que esta usando mi servidor squid como parent ,¿como puedo deshablitar esto? gracias. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Grabar Iso CentOS 6
El 29/09/11, Walter iqsiste...@gmail.com escribió: Buenas... ya baje la iso como en tres oportunidades y no logro quemarla en un DVD.. me dice que exede el Tamaño... aunque la imagen dice que pesa 4,4GB Yo he grabado esa misma imágen con brasero tanto en fedora 15 y en debian (está última no lanza nada de fallos, fedora 15 dice hubo un problema y no se puede expulsar la unidad, pero lo graba bien), si dice excede el tamaño puede ser que el disco no es dvd, eso sería lo primero que pensaría, otro que el archivo esta malo, cómo la descargaste?, usando un cliente bittorrent? o descarga directa? la iso que baje es la : i386-bin 4.4G, esa misma yo tengo. y con md5sum , me da correcto... osea me perdi de algo? la intento Grabar desde Linux con K3b.. o Brasero... yo no tuve problemas... y no es la primera vez que quemo una ISO... la Grabadora anda bien... disco o imagen son los problemas..., eso creo :) lo intente en la Notebook y en la Pc de escritorio con la version Live... no tuve problemas... Hay uno bueno que se llama CDBurnerXP, para windows me vá de maravillas :), por si tienes una pc con windows :) Saludos y Gracias Walter www.infoquil.com.ar ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Edguit@r http://cybernautape.blogspot.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] CentOS 6: corosync and pacemaker won't stop (patch)
Hi,
I cannot 'halt' my CentOS 6 servers while running corosync+pacemaker.
I believe the runlevels used to stop corosync and pacemaker are not in the
correct order and create the infinite Waiting for corosync services to
unload... loop thing.
This is my first time with this cluster technology but apparently pacemaker
has to be stopped /before/ corosync.
Applying the following patch to pacemaker init script fix this issue.
# diff -Nu /etc/init.d/pacemaker{.orig,}
--- /etc/init.d/pacemaker.orig 2011-09-27 14:08:32.984117731 +0200
+++ /etc/init.d/pacemaker 2011-09-27 14:08:56.125143439 +0200
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
#
# License: Revised BSD
-# chkconfig: - 90 90
+# chkconfig: - 90 75
# description: Pacemaker Cluster Manager
# processname: pacemaker
#
Florian
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0: iptables stacktrace with named chains 28 chars
Florian CROUZAT wrote on 2011-09-28: Hi, I'm not sure where to ask this question, you, redhat or netfilter so I'll ask you guys first, hoping you can redirect me where this post belongs. I have an issue with my CentOS 6 box with named chains in iptables. Apparently there is a builtin #define to limit chain names up to 30 chars, but the test condition fails and iptables crashes with a stacktrace. # cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux release 6.0 (Final) # rpm -qa | fgrep iptables iptables-ipv6-1.4.7-3.el6.x86_64 iptables-1.4.7-3.el6.x86_64 Use cases prove that you can create chains with names up to =30 chars but you can only reference =28 chars named chains. Trying to reference a 29 or 30 chars named chains will crash iptables. = Use cases with 28,29,30 and 31 chars long named chains: # iptables -N $(for((i=0;i28;i++));do printf %s a;done) echo ok || echo ko ok # iptables -N $(for((i=0;i29;i++));do printf %s b;done) echo ok || echo ko ok # iptables -N $(for((i=0;i30;i++));do printf %s c;done) echo ok || echo ko ok iptables -N $(for((i=0;i31;i++));do printf %s d;done) echo ok || echo ko iptables v1.4.7: chain name `ddd' too long (must be under 30 chars) Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information. ko # iptables -I INPUT -j echo ok || echo ko ok # iptables -I INPUT -j b echo ok || echo ko stacktrace ko # iptables -I INPUT -j cc echo ok || echo ko stacktrace ko I can attach strace output or the stacktrace if required. Any infos where to report this issue much appreciated. Florian. http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos This bug is not reproducible on CentOS release 5.6 (Final). Florian ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: corosync and pacemaker won't stop (patch)
Florian Crouzat wrote on 2011-09-29:
Hi,
I cannot 'halt' my CentOS 6 servers while running corosync+pacemaker. I
believe the runlevels used to stop corosync and pacemaker are not in the
correct order and create the infinite Waiting for corosync services to
unload... loop thing.
This is my first time with this cluster technology but apparently
pacemaker has to be stopped /before/ corosync. Applying the following
patch to pacemaker init script fix this issue.
# diff -Nu /etc/init.d/pacemaker{.orig,}
--- /etc/init.d/pacemaker.orig 2011-09-27 14:08:32.984117731 +0200
+++ /etc/init.d/pacemaker 2011-09-27 14:08:56.125143439 +0200
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
#
# License: Revised BSD
-# chkconfig: - 90 90
+# chkconfig: - 90 75
# description: Pacemaker Cluster Manager
# processname: pacemaker
#
Btw, it has already been fixedupstream.
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/blob/master/mcp/pacemaker.in#L9
Greetings,
Florian
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] add on sata card relabeling drives, installation
From: Bob Hoffman b...@bobhoffman.com When installing with anaconda, the 2 drives located on the add-on sata card are being listed as sda and sdb instead of going to the back of the line. Check in the bios if it proposes a ctrl detection order. JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] is there a way to make the kernel see a new ethernet device without rebooting?
I wonder if it has to do with the type of NIC. In my case, vmware says it's of type 'flexible', and the CentOS o.s uses the 'pcnet32' driver for it. Try: modprobe pcnet32 or if the module is already loaded rmmod pcnet32 modprobe pcnet32 Radu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to build a webserver, centos 6, videos
Bob Hoffman wrote: I am going to post videos on a youtube channel showing the steps I am taking in putting together a new server. channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/WebserverVideos Comments open, but moderated. This is just a personal webserver project and will cover the steps I take (and why) in building it. Interesting video, but I think the lighting needs to be brighter, particularly at the beginning when you were showing the ports on the end of the machine - I couldn't see them. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to build a webserver, centos 6, videos
-- Timothy Murphy wrote Interesting video, but I think the lighting needs to be brighter, particularly at the beginning when you were showing the ports on the end of the machine - I couldn't see them. -- Thanks. ALthough I have the software and a way to record the install and config, I had nothing special for the computer build, I tried to add what light I could (did it at night), and used the computer webcam to do it. It got darker when I rendered it though, tried to save space. Guess I could have played with the brightness in the video program. Its more for someone who is using dedicated or shared hosting and is afraid of making the move to colo. I wanted to show it is easier to put together a server than your own home computer. Later I am going to show a much cheaper 1,400 dollar server that is already in the datacenter. I am definitely not going to be on TV with my skills, but hope it helps someone make the jump. bob ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] 5.7 x86_64 DVD iso
I am trying to find a DVD iso that is not a torrent, and looking through the mirrors I am unable to find one. Does anyone happen to have a mirror or repository that they know of that carries the DVD iso for direct download? I am behind a pretty strict firewall and am unable to do torrents. Thanks in advance Michael Weiner === Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals in America by U.S.News World Report (2010). Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for a complete listing of our services, staff and locations. Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.7 x86_64 DVD iso
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011, Weiner, Michael wrote: I am trying to find a DVD iso that is not a torrent, and looking through the mirrors I am unable to find one. Does anyone happen to have a mirror or repository that they know of that carries the DVD iso for direct download? I am behind a pretty strict firewall and am unable to do torrents. Then you've not looked very hard. Pick a mirror and it should be easy to find under the isos directory. Here's an example: http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/mirror.centos.org/5/isos/x86_64/ jh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.7 x86_64 DVD iso
Sorry for the static guys, I managed to find one just after I hit send. My apologies Thanks! Michael Weiner === Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals in America by U.S.News World Report (2010). Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for a complete listing of our services, staff and locations. Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.7 x86_64 DVD iso
on 9/29/2011 8:29 AM Weiner, Michael spake the following: I am trying to find a DVD iso that is not a torrent, and looking through the mirrors I am unable to find one. Does anyone happen to have a mirror or repository that they know of that carries the DVD iso for direct download? I am behind a pretty strict firewall and am unable to do torrents. Try the mirror list http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=30 there is a column that states if a mirror has direct dvd downloads. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 79, Issue 10
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2011:1341 Critical CentOS 5 i386 firefox Update
(Johnny Hughes)
2. CESA-2011:1341 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 firefox Update
(Johnny Hughes)
3. CESA-2011:1343 Critical CentOS 5 i386 thunderbird Update
(Johnny Hughes)
4. CESA-2011:1343 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 thunderbird Update
(Johnny Hughes)
5. CEEA-2011:1345 CentOS 5 x86_64 openldap Update (Johnny Hughes)
6. CEEA-2011:1345 CentOS 5 i386 openldap Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:54:30 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1341 Critical CentOS 5 i386
firefox Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20110929035430.ga6...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1341 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1341.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
5dae95d6ce62de4d245ad634b899d56e firefox-3.6.23-2.el5.centos.i386.rpm
5b6e501c8621dbec7fe4227d8cf7203e xulrunner-1.9.2.23-1.el5_7.i386.rpm
b4ac1d4bd797dd1da02296d4e7615345 xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.23-1.el5_7.i386.rpm
Source:
607cdb48738c9f547b35fb80ddedeb60 firefox-3.6.23-2.el5.centos.src.rpm
d4f5f9fa6aca4a006c17c3b15fca51fd xulrunner-1.9.2.23-1.el5_7.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:54:31 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1341 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64
firefox Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20110929035431.ga6...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1341 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1341.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
5dae95d6ce62de4d245ad634b899d56e firefox-3.6.23-2.el5.centos.i386.rpm
9eb03996efe95755402d2e115ae9d38c firefox-3.6.23-2.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
5b6e501c8621dbec7fe4227d8cf7203e xulrunner-1.9.2.23-1.el5_7.i386.rpm
e724c7b5559182f771dfb2baaecae658 xulrunner-1.9.2.23-1.el5_7.x86_64.rpm
b4ac1d4bd797dd1da02296d4e7615345 xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.23-1.el5_7.i386.rpm
cd662869a05cd184f713e1c4fa4dc58c xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.23-1.el5_7.x86_64.rpm
Source:
607cdb48738c9f547b35fb80ddedeb60 firefox-3.6.23-2.el5.centos.src.rpm
d4f5f9fa6aca4a006c17c3b15fca51fd xulrunner-1.9.2.23-1.el5_7.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 04:34:00 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1343 Critical CentOS 5 i386
thunderbird Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20110929043400.ga9...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1343 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1343.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
cb55b2f841e048189488a90861729f4c thunderbird-2.0.0.24-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm
Source:
b9a631707641d84283eb20e9ac872caf thunderbird-2.0.0.24-26.el5.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 04:34:00 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1343 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64
thunderbird Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20110929043400.ga9...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1343 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1343.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
37be11bf79a58f8f2003c85b6a24e996 thunderbird-2.0.0.24-26.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
b9a631707641d84283eb20e9ac872caf thunderbird-2.0.0.24-26.el5.centos.src.rpm
Re: [CentOS] Odd issue with C6 and NIS
On 09/27/2011 11:55 AM, James A. Peltier wrote: I seem to have this very odd issue with CentOS 6 WRT NIS. I have taken the package selection that I used with CentOS 5 and basically plopped it into my C6 kickstart file (see below). On C5 this works just fine and I'm able to log in with NIS credentials just fine. However, it looks like on C6 if you use a package selection like this, you also need to specify the yp-tools package as part of the kickstart *even though* you specify an authentication method of NIS in the kickstart. Seems like a bug to me?!? since you mention nis, i'll guess you use automount as well. so be warned that centos 6 has some issues with automount. if automount requests are made rapidly (like on a mail server delivery to a large alias), it will quickly start failing to mount directories and get stuck that way for minutes. i don't have access to r*dh*t box to determine if this has been fixed with all the 6.1 updates. needless to say i can't roll out centos 6 yet. i have filed a centos bug (4984), but since i can't compare against upstream, i don't know for sure where the problem lies. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.7 x86_64 DVD iso
On 09/29/2011 11:29 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: I am trying to find a DVD iso that is not a torrent, and looking through the mirrors I am unable to find one. Does anyone happen to have a mirror or repository that they know of that carries the DVD iso for direct download? I am behind a pretty strict firewall and am unable to do torrents. Thanks in advance Michael Weiner Hi Michael, http://mirror.its.dal.ca/centos/6.0/isos/ Cheers, Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Odd issue with C6 and NIS
Hi Joe, Le 29/09/2011 18:18, Joe Pruett a écrit : since you mention nis, i'll guess you use automount as well. so be warned that centos 6 has some issues with automount. if automount requests are made rapidly (like on a mail server delivery to a large alias), it will quickly start failing to mount directories and get stuck that way for minutes. i don't have access to r*dh*t box to determine if this has been fixed with all the 6.1 updates. needless to say i can't roll out centos 6 yet. Did you try to install the CentOS 6 CR repo (continuous releaes), which brings to 6.0 the updates from 6.1 ? See : https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=33458forum=53 See if it solves the problem. Alain -- == Alain Péan - LPP/CNRS Administrateur Système/Réseau Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas - UMR 7648 Observatoire de Saint-Maur 4, av de Neptune, Bat. A 94100 Saint-Maur des Fossés Tel : 01-45-11-42-39 - Fax : 01-48-89-44-33 == ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.7 x86_64 DVD iso
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:39 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.ukwrote: Then you've not looked very hard. Pick a mirror and it should be easy to find under the isos directory. Actually John, i did take some time to peruse the mirrors list on the CentOS site (http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5/isos/x86_64/) and NONE of them have the DVD iso. it wasnt until i found another mirror listing, that i managed to find a couple that had the iso i was interested it. I was rather disappointed in how unintuitive finding the appropriate DVD was, and why everyone has gone to torrents, when i the business world, most places have Bittorrent disabled . Thank you for the URL however, i appreciate that :) Michael Weiner ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.7 x86_64 DVD iso
On 09/29/2011 11:29 AM, Weiner, Michael wrote: I am trying to find a DVD iso that is not a torrent, and looking through the mirrors I am unable to find one. Does anyone happen to have a mirror or repository that they know of that carries the DVD iso for direct download? I am behind a pretty strict firewall and am unable to do torrents. Thanks in advance Michael Weiner Sorry, should have read your message twice. http://mirror.its.dal.ca/centos/5.7/isos/x86_64/ Cheers again. Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.7 x86_64 DVD iso
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote: Try the mirror list http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=30 there is a column that states if a mirror has direct dvd downloads. Thank you Scott, that is the listing i finally managed to come across after perusing the mirror listing on the site ( http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5/isos/x86_64/) and realizing there were no DVD images there. I have bookmarked that URL for future reference. Strange that i have never really had this issue before, oh well, all is good :) Thanks again Michael Weiner ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.7 x86_64 DVD iso
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Phil Savoie psavoie1...@rogers.comwrote: http://mirror.its.dal.ca/centos/6.0/isos/ Thank you Phil!! Michael ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.7 x86_64 DVD iso
On 9/29/2011 12:24 PM, Michael Weiner wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:39 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.ukwrote: Then you've not looked very hard. Pick a mirror and it should be easy to find under the isos directory. Actually John, i did take some time to peruse the mirrors list on the CentOS site (http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5/isos/x86_64/) and NONE of them have the DVD iso. it wasnt until i found another mirror listing, that i managed to find a couple that had the iso i was interested it. I was rather disappointed in how unintuitive finding the appropriate DVD was, and why everyone has gone to torrents, when i the business world, most places have Bittorrent disabled . Thank you for the URL however, i appreciate that :) Michael Weiner I'm not sure where that url came from, but I went to the CentOS site, pulled up their North American mirror list from the link under the Downloads menu at the top and randomly checked a couple of the mirrors that claim to have direct DVD downloads (there are quite a few of them). Both of the ones I looked at had the DVD isos available for 5.7. http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=30 -- Bowie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.7 x86_64 DVD iso
On 09/29/11 9:24 AM, Michael Weiner wrote: Actually John, i did take some time to peruse the mirrors list on the CentOS site (http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5/isos/x86_64/) and NONE of them have the DVD iso. it wasnt until i found another mirror listing, that i managed to find a couple that had the iso i was interested it. I was rather disappointed in how unintuitive finding the appropriate DVD was, and why everyone has gone to torrents, when i the business world, most places have Bittorrent disabled . where did that link come from? I've never seen that one, always found this 1-2 clicks from the home page... http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=30 -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Odd issue with C6 and NIS
On 09/29/2011 09:23 AM, Alain Péan wrote: Hi Joe, Le 29/09/2011 18:18, Joe Pruett a écrit : since you mention nis, i'll guess you use automount as well. so be warned that centos 6 has some issues with automount. if automount requests are made rapidly (like on a mail server delivery to a large alias), it will quickly start failing to mount directories and get stuck that way for minutes. i don't have access to r*dh*t box to determine if this has been fixed with all the 6.1 updates. needless to say i can't roll out centos 6 yet. Did you try to install the CentOS 6 CR repo (continuous releaes), which brings to 6.0 the updates from 6.1 ? See : https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=33458forum=53 See if it solves the problem. sorry, forgot to mention that i have applied the cr updates. but i don't think the cr has everything from 6.1 yet (no new kernel, which i'd guess there will be). since the devs are still having issues with getting 6.1 to fully compile, i expect more packages to show up. there was an autofs update, but that didn't help the situation. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ssh -D socks proxy through CentOS-5
Is there anything special in the way of configuration that is required to enable a CentOS box to act as the point of origin for an http request routed to it via a SOCKS ssh link? I have researched this matter and the recommended procedure is to open an SSH connection to the desired host passing the requisite switches so: ssh -f -n -D port u...@host.domain.tld And then reconfigure the desired applications to use the localhost:port as the SOCKS proxy. However, I cannot seem to get this to work with my CentOS based desktop to which I am trying to connect through a public wireless network. I connect to the desktop via terminal (on OSX-10.6.8 fine), but setting the browser, Firefox-3.6.23, advanced network config to use localhost:port as a SOCKSv5 proxy for http simply results in the browser failing to show anything. I do not get any error, I just get a blank page for whatever url I try. I have tried this with and without the iptables service running on the target and achieved the same results. Therefore I do not consider the firewall configuration on the target to be the immediate problem. Has anyone here tried to do this and succeeded? Supplemental question: How does one route an https connection to a non-standard port via SOCKS? How does one configure a browser to do this? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ssh -D socks proxy through CentOS-5
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:54 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote: Is there anything special in the way of configuration that is required to enable a CentOS box to act as the point of origin for an http request routed to it via a SOCKS ssh link? I have researched this matter and the recommended procedure is to open an SSH connection to the desired host passing the requisite switches so: ssh -f -n -D port u...@host.domain.tld And then reconfigure the desired applications to use the localhost:port as the SOCKS proxy. Would this blog help? It's been working for me: http://blog.toracat.org/2008/09/socks-proxy-with-auto-config/ Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] VLAN support?
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:12 PM, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote: | Are there any new tools in CentOS 6 to configure VLAN interfaces | (where | the switch passes multiple tagged VLANs over one physical link to the | host) or is it best to edit /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/eth?.vlan# | files manually? | So far none that I've found. I use VLANs quite extensively so I'm stuck rolling it with kickstart/puppet or manually when testing. Where is the best place to find documentation on how to set them up manually? When I use the same ifcfg-eth#.vlan# configs as in 5.x, ifup gives me an error about 'Device not managed by NetworkManager' . -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] add on sata card relabeling drives, installation
On Wednesday, September 28, 2011 07:47:15 PM Bob Hoffman wrote: I do not want my raid 1 mirror OS to be on sdc, sdd, and sdeit just looks weird. It's related to PCI enumeration order, and may not be changeable. You could try the add-on card in another slot. However, if you think that's weird, I want you to note the portion of the output of mount below, and note the drive device my /boot is on (and yes, that is actually the real booting drive): [root@www ~]# mount|grep boot /dev/sdag1 on /boot type ext4 (rw) [root@www ~]# cat /etc/issue Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.1 (Santiago) Kernel \r on an \m [root@www ~]# ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] add on sata card relabeling drives, installation
- Original Message - From: Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 1:36:28 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] add on sata card relabeling drives, installation On Wednesday, September 28, 2011 07:47:15 PM Bob Hoffman wrote: I do not want my raid 1 mirror OS to be on sdc, sdd, and sdeit just looks weird. It's related to PCI enumeration order, and may not be changeable. You could try the add-on card in another slot. However, if you think that's weird, I want you to note the portion of the output of mount below, and note the drive device my /boot is on (and yes, that is actually the real booting drive): [root@www ~]# mount|grep boot /dev/sdag1 on /boot type ext4 (rw) [root@www ~]# cat /etc/issue Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.1 (Santiago) Kernel \r on an \m [root@www ~]# ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos This type of issue is why relying on /dev/sdX is bad. Mounting based on uuid or label when available is best. Unfortunately, there are controller cards that present all disks as the same uuid. It makes using mdadm that can only see /dev/sdX a pain to use. David. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] add on sata card relabeling drives, installation
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 4:09 PM, David C. Miller mille...@fusion.gat.com wrote: This type of issue is why relying on /dev/sdX is bad. Mounting based on uuid or label when available is best. Unfortunately, there are controller cards that present all disks as the same uuid. It makes using mdadm that can only see /dev/sdX a pain to use. So how do you propose getting a uuid or label on a disk in the first place if you can't identify which is which physically? And how do you know which to move when you want the content in some other box? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] add on sata card relabeling drives, installation
Les Mikesell wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 4:09 PM, David C. Miller mille...@fusion.gat.com wrote: This type of issue is why relying on /dev/sdX is bad. Mounting based on uuid or label when available is best. Unfortunately, there are controller cards that present all disks as the same uuid. It makes using mdadm that can only see /dev/sdX a pain to use. So how do you propose getting a uuid or label on a disk in the first place if you can't identify which is which physically? And how do you know which to move when you want the content in some other box? When I build, our PXEboot ks partitions and labels the partitions. When I add or replace, I make the partition, the fs, and e2label them. I've gotten to really appreciate labeling. I hate the UUIDs - they're ludicrously too long, and bear no relationship to what device they are, or where they go. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] add on sata card relabeling drives, installation
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 4:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: This type of issue is why relying on /dev/sdX is bad. Mounting based on uuid or label when available is best. Unfortunately, there are controller cards that present all disks as the same uuid. It makes using mdadm that can only see /dev/sdX a pain to use. So how do you propose getting a uuid or label on a disk in the first place if you can't identify which is which physically? And how do you know which to move when you want the content in some other box? When I build, our PXEboot ks partitions and labels the partitions. When I add or replace, I make the partition, the fs, and e2label them. I've gotten to really appreciate labeling. I hate the UUIDs - they're ludicrously too long, and bear no relationship to what device they are, or where they go. What happens when you move the disks around among machines? Or don't you ever do that after they contain data? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] add on sata card relabeling drives, installation
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 05:16:16 PM Les Mikesell wrote: So how do you propose getting a uuid or label on a disk in the first place if you can't identify which is which physically? And how do you know which to move when you want the content in some other box? Drive model number plus serial number. Really the only way; when putting systems together you just need to note the drive model and serial number(s). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] add on sata card relabeling drives, installation
Les Mikesell wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 4:19 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: This type of issue is why relying on /dev/sdX is bad. Mounting based on uuid or label when available is best. Unfortunately, there are controller cards that present all disks as the same uuid. It makes using mdadm that can only see /dev/sdX a pain to use. snip When I build, our PXEboot ks partitions and labels the partitions. When I add or replace, I make the partition, the fs, and e2label them. I've gotten to really appreciate labeling. I hate the UUIDs - they're ludicrously too long, and bear no relationship to what device they are, or where they go. What happens when you move the disks around among machines? Or don't you ever do that after they contain data? Other than offline backups, we don't move disks, other than to replace. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Error installing Postfix - Mysql Support
Hello: Does anyone have any idea how resolve this error on my server to install postfix with mysql support? Dedicated Server with CentOS 5.7 64 Bit. I get this dependency information when trying to use the command yum-y install postfix Error: Missing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.15()(64bit) is needed by package 2:postfix-2.3.3-2.3.centos.mysql_pgsql.x86_64 (centosplus) Error: Missing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.15(libmysqlclient_15)(64bit) is needed by package 2:postfix-2.3.3-2.3.centos.mysql_pgsql.x86_64 (centosplus) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest At the command below: root@server [/tmp]# ldconfig -p | grep libmysqlclient.so.15 libmysqlclient.so.15 (libc6,x86-64) = /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.15 libmysqlclient.so.15 (libc6,x86-64) = /usr/lib64/libmysqlclient.so.15 I appreciate any information. Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Error installing Postfix - Mysql Support
Have you tried removing the currently installed libmysql and the trying to install postfix? Perhaps yum can then see the missing dependency (because you removed it) and resolve it sanely? On 29 September 2011 23:05, Silvio Tadeu silvio.in...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello: Does anyone have any idea how resolve this error on my server to install postfix with mysql support? Dedicated Server with CentOS 5.7 64 Bit. I get this dependency information when trying to use the command yum-y install postfix Error: Missing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.15()(64bit) is needed by package 2:postfix-2.3.3-2.3.centos.mysql_pgsql.x86_64 (centosplus) Error: Missing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.15(libmysqlclient_15)(64bit) is needed by package 2:postfix-2.3.3-2.3.centos.mysql_pgsql.x86_64 (centosplus) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest At the command below: root@server [/tmp]# ldconfig -p | grep libmysqlclient.so.15 libmysqlclient.so.15 (libc6,x86-64) = /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.15 libmysqlclient.so.15 (libc6,x86-64) = /usr/lib64/libmysqlclient.so.15 I appreciate any information. Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] data recovery
Lamar, Thanks for the info. Paras. On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote: On Monday, September 26, 2011 11:18:06 AM Paras pradhan wrote: On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote: May I ask what sort of SAN? Its a Hitachi OpenV fibre channel SAN (4Gbps HBA). My storage admin checked if this LUN can be accessible by others and he found no other hosts have access to it. Ok. I've seen some odd LUN reshuffling before, ... reshuffling here means automatically changing disk's geometry as I am having an issue? It would be interesting to know if this can happen. No, reshuffling as in a host gained access to LUNs in a 'phantom' manner that it should not have had access to. No longer a problem, and hasn't been for a great while. It was an odd interaction, but I forget the details. If another host were put onto the FC with the exact same WWN onto the fabric it might be possible to see this sort of thing, too, but the WWN's are all supposed to be unique. Here are some new additional info : ... So my question is: if the LUN has been re partitioned for ex: say to install windows , why am i seeing our data in these newly created partitions? Is it possible to see data in a reapportioned drive? Yes, it is. If the recovery tool can look at the raw device it can grab stuff that isn't in any partition, and you can look at that data. Standard forensics. Repartitioning erases nothing except the partition table. Now, in the specific case of GPT, it is further possible to have a GPT and an MBR at the same time, and while the 'shadow' MBR is supposed to match the GPT's partitioning it doesn't have to. If you read through the LVM2 documentation and source code you may be able to find the signature used to mark a partition as being LVM; once you do that you should be able to find the start of the partition, and re-write the partition table(s). I use the plural there since with GPT you can have the GPT and the MBR coexisting; ideally you'd want to wipe the GPT out, but in reality you may not want to. But, being that you really don't want to write anything to this volume, you really should set up an offset, read-only, loop device; that is, find the starting sector of the partition (preferably an image of the LUN, and not the actual LUN; can the Hitachi array do LUN replication (EMC's SANcopy or Snapview or MirrorView being the rough equivalents)?). Then, once you find the starting position of the LVM physical volume: START_OFFSET_BYTE='actual starting sector number * sector size, zero origin' DEVLUN='LUN device, probably /dev/sde in your case' losetup -o $START_OFFSET_BYTE --read-only /dev/loop0 $DEVLUN Then see if you can get LVM to see this physical volume (by default loop devices are included in the scan, but you may want to verify they're not filtered in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf): pvscan vgscan lvscan You may be able to mount (-o ro of course) the LV at that point (I'm going through the LVM business because you mentioned VG names in your post). Hope that helps. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] VLAN support?
Not sure if someone has asked this previously, but have you got the 8021q kernel module installed and loaded? On 29 September 2011 20:15, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:12 PM, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote: | Are there any new tools in CentOS 6 to configure VLAN interfaces | (where | the switch passes multiple tagged VLANs over one physical link to the | host) or is it best to edit /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/eth?.vlan# | files manually? | So far none that I've found. I use VLANs quite extensively so I'm stuck rolling it with kickstart/puppet or manually when testing. Where is the best place to find documentation on how to set them up manually? When I use the same ifcfg-eth#.vlan# configs as in 5.x, ifup gives me an error about 'Device not managed by NetworkManager' . -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Error installing Postfix - Mysql Support
Hi Michael: Excuse me for sure now, but you can remove the libmysql, without removing the MySQL? Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:34:08 +0100 From: mrcri...@gmail.com To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Error installing Postfix - Mysql Support Have you tried removing the currently installed libmysql and the trying to install postfix? Perhaps yum can then see the missing dependency (because you removed it) and resolve it sanely? On 29 September 2011 23:05, Silvio Tadeu silvio.in...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello: Does anyone have any idea how resolve this error on my server to install postfix with mysql support? Dedicated Server with CentOS 5.7 64 Bit. I get this dependency information when trying to use the command yum-y install postfix Error: Missing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.15()(64bit) is needed by package 2:postfix-2.3.3-2.3.centos.mysql_pgsql.x86_64 (centosplus) Error: Missing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.15(libmysqlclient_15)(64bit) is needed by package 2:postfix-2.3.3-2.3.centos.mysql_pgsql.x86_64 (centosplus) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest At the command below: root@server [/tmp]# ldconfig -p | grep libmysqlclient.so.15 libmysqlclient.so.15 (libc6,x86-64) = /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.15 libmysqlclient.so.15 (libc6,x86-64) = /usr/lib64/libmysqlclient.so.15 I appreciate any information. Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] zoneminder-1.24.4-3.el6.x86_64.rpm
On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 12:28:38 AM Joseph L. Casale wrote: ftp://ftp.muug.mb.ca/mirror/fedora/linux/updates/testing/15/SRPMS/zoneminder -1.24.4-3.fc15.src.rpm My bad, thought you had to modify the spec... There were some recent changes to a bz I was following that got resolved which got me thinking now that CentOS 6 is out I should get this done. And without a whole lot of effort, this is doable with mock (as installed from EPEL; you can get everything you need by installing fedora-packager). You need the following packages in a local mock repo, all rebuilt with 'mock --rebuild' from the F15 source RPM's grabbed from an F15 mirror: perl-PHP-Serialization-0.34-2.el6.noarch.rpm perl-Sys-Mmap-0.14-3.el6.x86_64.rpm perl-Sys-Mmap-debuginfo-0.14-3.el6.x86_64.rpm (the debuginfo not really required). You'll need to use createrepo on the lock mock repo; edit the appropriate /etc/mock config (in my case, /etc/mock/epel-6-x86_64.cfg) to make the local repo have: baseurl=file:///path/to/your/local/repo/ In my case, this was /var/lib/mock/localrepo: baseurl=file:///var/lib/mock/localrepo/ If you want CR included in the buildroot you'll need to add it to the mock config; you'll want to expand out the $releasever and $basearch yourself. Also, you need to issue 'mock --install perl-Time-HiRes' since the F15 ZoneMinder package doesn't call that out as a buildrequires, but it is in fact required (F14 at least provides perl(Time::HiRes) in the perl package, but C6 provides it in perl-Time-HiRes). And you need to do the mock rebuild of the zoneminder source RPM with --no-clean after the mock --install... But I was able to get this to build. I have not yet installed it; that's the next step. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] add on sata card relabeling drives, installation
-- Lamar Owen wrote Drive model number plus serial number. Really the only way; when putting systems together you just need to note the drive model and serial number(s) -- That seems like an important thing. After some research I have decided the only two options are 1) to leave as is and deal with any software (such as monitoring tools, mdadm reports, etc) as they come and try to fix them. 2) You can actually change the order that UDEV looks at things and you can assign permanent drive letters AFTER the install. However, there is not much documentation on that, so option 1 seems easiest. I do not understand the technical reasons why linux decided to dynamically label things sda, sdb, etc. After looking at udev files I find the drives are listed by UUID and a deeper labeling system like hd0, hd1, hd2. So why even have the labels in the first place if the system doesn't use them, you cannot rely on them, and apparently they don't matter? It would be better for the anaconda installer to just list them as hd0, hd1, hd2, etc. Where this is an issue is when you are cloning drives, adding grubs, etc...because all my instructions rely on using sda, sdb, etc...and not UUID or other things. And reports from mdadm (and all tech instructions) use the sda sdb. IT is what it is. I am sure there is a reason. Just odd. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] zoneminder-1.24.4-3.el6.x86_64.rpm
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Lamar Owen Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 7:19 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] zoneminder-1.24.4-3.el6.x86_64.rpm On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 12:28:38 AM Joseph L. Casale wrote: ftp://ftp.muug.mb.ca/mirror/fedora/linux/updates/testing/15/SRPMS/zon eminder -1.24.4-3.fc15.src.rpm My bad, thought you had to modify the spec... There were some recent changes to a bz I was following that got resolved which got me thinking now that CentOS 6 is out I should get this done. And without a whole lot of effort, this is doable with mock (as installed from EPEL; you can get everything you need by installing fedora-packager). You need the following packages in a local mock repo, all rebuilt with 'mock --rebuild' from the F15 source RPM's grabbed from an F15 mirror: This was my first attempt to rebuild a source rpm. It worked, it installed and I'm stunned it runs. :-) This weekend, I will pull my video capture card and install it in my new server. I don't see any reason, at this point, it won't work, unless there is a problem with this 32 bit PCI card. What is a fedora-packager? It seems your method may be less time consuming as it took me several hours to 'look for' and install the dependencies. perl-PHP-Serialization-0.34-2.el6.noarch.rpm perl-Sys-Mmap-0.14-3.el6.x86_64.rpm perl-Sys-Mmap-debuginfo-0.14-3.el6.x86_64.rpm I had to install a lot more than that but it was a fresh CentOS 6 install that didn't have a lot of perl modules installed. (the debuginfo not really required). You'll need to use createrepo on the lock mock repo; edit the appropriate /etc/mock config (in my case, /etc/mock/epel-6-x86_64.cfg) to make the local repo have: baseurl=file:///path/to/your/local/repo/ In my case, this was /var/lib/mock/localrepo: baseurl=file:///var/lib/mock/localrepo/ I have nothing in /var/lib/mock If you want CR included in the buildroot you'll need to add it to the mock config; you'll want to expand out the $releasever and $basearch yourself. Also, you need to issue 'mock --install perl-Time-HiRes' since the F15 ZoneMinder package doesn't call that out as a buildrequires, but it is in fact required (F14 at least provides perl(Time::HiRes) in the perl package, but C6 provides it in perl-Time-HiRes). And you need to do the mock rebuild of the zoneminder source RPM with --no-clean after the mock --install... OK, you just lost me. But I was able to get this to build. I have not yet installed it; that's the next step. It would be nice to have all the requires built into the .rpm as mailscanner provides but I'm sure that's some serious stuff I'd never be able to learn on my own. Zoneminder is a nice application. I wish the CentOS Community could make it an 'extra'. Can't tell you the peace of mind I have when I'm out of town and can check on my furry, four legged children. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] add on sata card relabeling drives, installation
- Original Message - From: Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 2:16:16 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] add on sata card relabeling drives, installation On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 4:09 PM, David C. Miller mille...@fusion.gat.com wrote: This type of issue is why relying on /dev/sdX is bad. Mounting based on uuid or label when available is best. Unfortunately, there are controller cards that present all disks as the same uuid. It makes using mdadm that can only see /dev/sdX a pain to use. So how do you propose getting a uuid or label on a disk in the first place if you can't identify which is which physically? And how do you know which to move when you want the content in some other box? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com I just had to come up with a solution for this recently. Here is what I did. I create a small 2 block partition on each disk and gave them labels that is the drives serial number when I format them as ext3/4. I dedicate the rest of the disk to Linux auto RAID. Something like this to create a label. mkfs.ext3 -L $DRIVE_SN /dev/sd1 I then have a script that mounts the small partitions by label to a directory with the same name as the label. mount LABEL=$DRIVE_SN /mnt/drive-check/$DRIVE_SN So if you do a df it will show something like. FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/md0 71G 3.9G 63G 6% / tmpfs 12G 0 12G 0% /dev/shm /dev/sdc1 16M 1.2M 14M 8% /mnt/drive-check/WD-WMAY03208723 /dev/sdd1 16M 1.2M 14M 8% /mnt/drive-check/WD-WMAY03287844 /dev/sde1 16M 1.2M 14M 8% /mnt/drive-check/WD-WMAY03247298 /dev/sdf1 16M 1.2M 14M 8% /mnt/drive-check/WD-WMAY03247844 /dev/sdg1 16M 1.2M 14M 8% /mnt/drive-check/WD-WMAY03674888 /dev/sdh1 16M 1.2M 14M 8% /mnt/drive-check/WD-WMAY03678644 /dev/sdi1 16M 1.2M 14M 8% /mnt/drive-check/WD-WMAY03674814 /dev/sdj1 16M 1.2M 14M 8% /mnt/drive-check/WD-WMAY03675850 /dev/sdk1 16M 1.2M 14M 8% /mnt/drive-check/WD-WMAY03675194 /dev/sdl1 16M 1.2M 14M 8% /mnt/drive-check/WD-WMAY03288196 /dev/sdm1 16M 1.2M 14M 8% /mnt/drive-check/WD-WMAY03672314 /dev/sdn1 16M 1.2M 14M 8% /mnt/drive-check/WD-WMAY03287843 /dev/sdo1 16M 1.2M 14M 8% /mnt/drive-check/WD-WMAY03674460 /dev/sdp1 16M 1.2M 14M 8% /mnt/drive-check/WD-WMAY03585344 /dev/sdq1 16M 1.2M 14M 8% /mnt/drive-check/WD-WMAY03508896 /dev/sdr1 16M 1.2M 14M 8% /mnt/drive-check/WD-WMAY03209984 Now if I'm using mdadm to make a software RAID and it is complaining /dev/sdf2 is missing. I can run my script to mount all the small partitions and the one that complains it can't mount is easily identified by the serial number. Sure I can just let the hardware RAID card handle everything but I don't trust them from past experiences seeing failed cards and corrupted arrays. With the disks seen by linux as raw block devices I can put these disks on any JBOD controller and mount my raid using mdadm. I'm not tied to a particular controller if it fails. David. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Running Apache sites as separate users
I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having each website use a different user to run the hosting service. So example1.comhas it's own Apache instance running as apache1 and then example2.com has its own instance of Apache as apache2. Is this even possible or realistic? I understand the idea of how that would be secure, much like creating a virtual machine to segregate services. The only way I can think how this is done is to chroot each website. What makes this request even stranger is that each website will be managed by the same CMS and code base. So with that being the case, I don't see how this is possible. Any ideas or insight are very welcome. Thanks - Trey ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Running Apache sites as separate users
On 09/29/11 6:22 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote: I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having each website use a different user to run the hosting service. So example1.comhas it's own Apache instance running as apache1 and then example2.com has its own instance of Apache as apache2. Is this even possible or realistic? I understand the idea of how that would be secure, much like creating a virtual machine to segregate services. The only way I can think how this is done is to chroot each website. What makes this request even stranger is that each website will be managed by the same CMS and code base. So with that being the case, I don't see how this is possible. Any ideas or insight are very welcome. afaik, its only possible to use multiple instances of apache if you have multiple IP addresses, each one bound to a different address, or use different ports for each site (which would require specifying the :port as part of the URL) I'd strongly question the rationale behind this request. sounds like half-thinking to me. -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Running Apache sites as separate users
On 09/30/2011 03:31 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 09/29/11 6:22 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote: I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having each website use a different user to run the hosting service. So example1.comhas it's own Apache instance running as apache1 and then example2.com has its own instance of Apache as apache2. Is this even possible or realistic? I understand the idea of how that would be secure, much like creating a virtual machine to segregate services. The only way I can think how this is done is to chroot each website. What makes this request even stranger is that each website will be managed by the same CMS and code base. So with that being the case, I don't see how this is possible. Any ideas or insight are very welcome. afaik, its only possible to use multiple instances of apache if you have multiple IP addresses, each one bound to a different address, or use different ports for each site (which would require specifying the :port as part of the URL) I'd strongly question the rationale behind this request. sounds like half-thinking to me. I wonder if SELinux/sVirt can be used for something like this. sVirt was created to isolate running virtual machine instances from one another. Something similar should be possible for virtual hosts at least in theory. Regards, Dennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Apache security , Was: Running Apache sites as separate users
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Lucian luc...@lastdot.org wrote: On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Trey Dockendorf treyd...@gmail.com wrote: I had a recent request to improve security on my web servers by having each website use a different user to run the hosting service. So example1.comhas it's own Apache instance running as apache1 and then example2.com has its own instance of Apache as apache2. Is this even possible or realistic? I understand the idea of how that would be secure, much like creating a virtual machine to segregate services. The only way I can think how this is done is to chroot each website. What makes this request even stranger is that each website will be managed by the same CMS and code base. So with that being the case, I don't see how this is possible. Any ideas or insight are very welcome. Is there a specific requirement to run different http servers? Because if there is not then you can just use Suexec+fastcgi. Otherwise, just use Apache to proxy stuff to backend servers (can be anything from apache to nginx). HTH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I do not know the exact reasoning for wanting each website to be run by a separate Apache process that has it's own user. Likely it's a misunderstanding of actual threats to websites, or using a IIS mindset to set requirements for Apache. I'll give Suexec+fastcgi a look and mod_ruid. Thanks for those suggestions While on subject of Apache security... Another request / idea was to have this CMS under development write user controls to .htaccess files to restrict download access to directories. Typically if I even allow any overrides, I set it so apache can only read .htaccess. My understanding of the more obvious implications is that if the web server can write to .htaccess so can any attacker, and then can easily inject malware or redirect the site to malicious content. Is there ever a case where it's safe to allow write access by apache to .htaccess? Does the below config for .htaccess in httpd.conf protect from this at all if write permissions were given on the file system? Files ~ ^\.htaccess Order allow,deny Deny from all Satisfy All /Files Personally I think that the CMS should handle authorization, and at then possibly rely on Apache for authentication. In the case of this CMS it will be authenticating against a campus SSO through CAS, but access has to be restricted based on user lists. - Trey ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to build a webserver, centos 6, videos
On Thursday 29 September 2011 01:43, Bob Hoffman wrote: I am going to post videos on a youtube channel showing the steps I am taking in putting together a new server. I am by no means an expert and it is intended for people who just want to get a gist of what it entails. channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/WebserverVideos Wow, A Fifth of Beethoven in the sound track! :-) I think this kind of video is always useful. However, I would suggest you make a special effort to speak very slowly and clearly. Regards, -- Yves Bellefeuille y...@storm.ca La Esperanta Civito ne rifuzas anticipe la kunlaboron de erarintoj, se ili konscias pri sia eraro. -- Heroldo Komunikas, n-ro 473. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to build a webserver, centos 6, videos
--- yves wrote Wow, A Fifth of Beethoven in the sound track! :-) I think this kind of video is always useful. However, I would suggest you make a special effort to speak very slowly and clearly. Regards, True (and you just showed your age). I never did a vid before and was first attempt. Am thinking about redoing audio. Just wanted to show people that building a server is not that hard and if they are thinking about it, they should jump in. the webcam microphone was not so good and it was really early in the morning...(or late in the evening I should say). next vid gonna be more 60s stuff background music...in about a few hours from now. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to build a webserver, centos 6, videos
On 09/29/11 9:54 PM, Bob Hoffman wrote: the webcam microphone was not so good and it was really early in the morning...(or late in the evening I should say). you really should use a lapel microphone for that sort of thing, and good lighting is critical to decent video. one approach is to not talk while recording the video, and do the speech as a voice over, recorded seperately... -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] [solved] passwd problem with new vps
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 18:37:52 PM +0200, Marco Fioretti wrote: greetings, I am setting up Centos 6 i686 remotely, on a new VPS. A problem I have is that I cannot set password for new users. I solved this, so to speak, reinstalling from scratch. I had likely installed conflicting security related packages and/or misconfigured them. Marco ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
