Re: [CentOS-virt] bridging bonded NICs, centos6
De: Bob Hoffman b...@bobhoffman.com À: centos-virt@centos.org Envoyé: Mardi 25 Octobre 2011 02:44:40 Objet: [CentOS-virt] bridging bonded NICs, centos6 Trying to think this through, hope someone can lend a hand. I have 3 eths I want to bond together and that seems simple enough. eth0,1,2 - bond0 , though not sure how this would be for multiple ip addresses needed for the virtual machines... perhaps eth:0, eth:1 etcto bond0:1, bond0:2 ? then I want to bridge to my virtual machines I am going to be using virtual machines, each with one ip address (websites) some with possibly more than one ip... so... for each ip do I need to bond all three nics, go to a new bonding file, then to the bridge file for that virtual machine? what happens when I use two IP addresses for the same virtual machine? Each machine wants to use just one bridge, but will it use more than one? I am pretty sure each bonding file must have an ipaddress on it...so perhaps it will be multiple eth files pointing to multiple bonding files pointing to single bridge files for each machine? somewhat confused. any help appreciated. am I even close? ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt Hi Bob, I use bonding on my Xen hypervisor and my virtual machines are in bridged mode (with VLAN). I didn't create virtual interface (bond0:X) for my VMs, IP addresses are configured in VM (like a physical box). If you want to have multiple IPs for the same VM, you just have to create virtual interface in your VM, or if IPs are not on the same VLAN (i don't know if you use VLAN), just add another interface in your VM config file and link it to the other bridge and make network configuration for it in VM like the first one. Hope this helps. Regards. Baptiste. ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] onboot=yes not working for eth0.x:y interfaces?
Baptiste AGASSE Lyra Network, Service Systèmes et Réseaux Rue Carmin, BP 87350, 31673 Labège Cedex - France Tél: (+33)5.67.22.31.87 Fax: (+33)5.67.22.31.61 Mail: baptiste.aga...@lyra-network.com Site: http://www.lyra-network.com - Mail original - De: Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de À: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS centos-virt@centos.org Envoyé: Lundi 24 Octobre 2011 18:59:28 Objet: [CentOS-virt] onboot=yes not working for eth0.x:y interfaces? Hi, I ran into a Problem when using alias interfaces with vlans on a centos 5 box. When I define such an interface and do a service network restart the alias interface doesn't get started. Starting it manually works fine. Also after changing DEVICE=eth0.10:0 to DEVICE=eth0:0 in the config file the interface is started after a network restart. Does anyone have an idea what the problem might be or a suitable workaround? Regards, Dennis ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt Hi, Why do you want to have virtual interface over vlan interface ? These virtual interfaces are for VMs ? Regards. Baptiste. ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-es] Error con Cyrus-imap (Alexander Jose Labrador Guevara)
Hola Alexander: El problema es que el demonio SASLAUTHD no se esta ejecutando:lo único que necesitas bueno primero , es tener instalado el saslauthd y luego reinicias el servicio: service saslauthd restart y listo!!. Saludos. Luis Roman ==Error con el admin de cyrus=== # cyradm -user cyrus -auth login localhost IMAP Password: Authentication failed. at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Cyrus/IMAP/Admin.pm line 119 cyradm: cannot authenticate to server with login as cyrus -- Alexander Labrador a.k.a rednaxel4 User : GNU/Linux Debian , CentOS 5.x LinuxCounter: 447825 Twitter : @rednaxel4 Blog Personal - http://blog.cachamay.org.ve/ GuayanaLIVE - Free Music - http://guayanalive.com.ve Proyecto Cachamay - http://cachamay.org.ve ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] ssd quandry
From: John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com On a CentOS 6 64bit system, I added a couple prototype SAS SSDs on a HP P411 raid controller ... Disk Name: /dev/sdc ... Just wondering how come the array is detected as /dev/sd* instead of the classical /dev/cciss/c0d*... Is the P411 a fake raid? JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ssd quandry
On 10/25/11 2:16 AM, John Doe wrote: Just wondering how come the array is detected as /dev/sd* instead of the classical /dev/cciss/c0d*... Is the P411 a fake raid? no, its a seriously fast pci-e SAS2 hardware raid. the physical devices don't show at all. it has 1GB of writeback cache thats backed by flash with a supercap, instead of the traditional battery that dies in 3 years. I didn't have to install any special drivers to use it, C6 just saw it as-is, /dev/sda is a raid1 of disks 0,1, /dev/sdb is a raid10 of disks 2-22, and sdc is a raid0 of SSD 23,24 (disk 25 is a hot spare for sda,sdb) its configurable with the hpacucli command tool I got from HP's site. # lspci -vnn -s 6:0.0 06:00.0 RAID bus controller [0104]: Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array G6 controllers [103c:323a] (rev 01) Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array P410 [103c:3243] Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 24 Memory at fbc0 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=2M] Memory at fbbff000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] I/O ports at d800 [size=256] Expansion ROM at fbb0 [disabled] [size=512K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3 Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+ Capabilities: [70] Express Endpoint, MSI 00 Capabilities: [ac] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=16 Masked- Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting Kernel driver in use: hpsa Kernel modules: hpsa # hpacucli ctrl slot=1 show detail Smart Array P410 in Slot 1 Bus Interface: PCI Slot: 1 Serial Number: PACCRCN810E1R9J Cache Serial Number: PBCDF0CRH0Q13H RAID 6 (ADG) Status: Disabled Controller Status: OK Hardware Revision: Rev C Firmware Version: 5.12 Rebuild Priority: Medium Expand Priority: Medium Surface Scan Delay: 15 secs Surface Scan Mode: Idle Queue Depth: Automatic Monitor and Performance Delay: 60 min Elevator Sort: Enabled Degraded Performance Optimization: Disabled Inconsistency Repair Policy: Disabled Wait for Cache Room: Disabled Surface Analysis Inconsistency Notification: Disabled Post Prompt Timeout: 0 secs Cache Board Present: True Cache Status: OK Accelerator Ratio: 25% Read / 75% Write Drive Write Cache: Disabled Total Cache Size: 1024 MB No-Battery Write Cache: Disabled Cache Backup Power Source: Capacitors Battery/Capacitor Count: 1 Battery/Capacitor Status: OK SATA NCQ Supported: True dunno if that helps? since I got it sorted out with 4k blocks and XFS, I'm seeing about 12000 write IOPS via pgbench to that sdb raid10, and 16000 wr/s to the sdc SSD raid1, these are both pretty close to flat out for the disks. sustained writes from iozone hit 1.2GB/sec on sdb and 800MB/s on sdc, also pretty much hardware bandwidth of the disks. -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ssd quandry
From: John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com On 10/25/11 2:16 AM, John Doe wrote: Just wondering how come the array is detected as /dev/sd* instead of the classical /dev/cciss/c0d*... Is the P411 a fake raid? no, its a seriously fast pci-e SAS2 hardware raid. the physical devices don't show at all. it has 1GB of writeback cache thats backed by flash with a supercap, instead of the traditional battery that dies in 3 years. Indeed, nice specs. How much does it cost...? I didn't have to install any special drivers to use it, C6 just saw it as-is, /dev/sda Guess this new ctrl does not use the cciss module anymore. Thx, JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] PHP 5.3.3 question
Can PHP 5.3.3 be installed on CentOS 5.3, or is it not compatable, and if so what is the recommended version of CentOS to use? Thanks, Robert Anstruther. SQA Dalkeith is moving. From 21 November 2011 our address will be; Lowden, 24 Wester Shawfair, Dalkeith, Midlothian, EH22 1FD. There is no change to the address for SQA Glasgow. ** This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted by e-mail. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. SQA accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Scottish Qualifications Authority www.sqa.org.uk postmas...@sqa.org.uk ** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.3.3 question
De: Bob Anstruther bob.anstrut...@sqa.org.uk À: centos@centos.org Envoyé: Mardi 25 Octobre 2011 12:48:26 Objet: [CentOS] PHP 5.3.3 question Can PHP 5.3.3 be installed on CentOS 5.3, or is it not compatable, and if so what is the recommended version of CentOS to use? Thanks, Robert Anstruther. SQA Dalkeith is moving. From 21 November 2011 our address will be; Lowden, 24 Wester Shawfair, Dalkeith, Midlothian, EH22 1FD. There is no change to the address for SQA Glasgow. ** This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted by e-mail. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. SQA accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Scottish Qualifications Authority www.sqa.org.uk postmas...@sqa.org.uk ** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi, You must upgrade your box to the latest 5.x version (currently 5.7), the php53 (php 5.3.3) package is provided in the main repo. Regards. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.3.3 question
Hi, thank you for the quick response, it will save me time trying to make things work on CentOS 5.3, as I have been looking at several sites through google which did not give any definitive information. thanks, Robert Anstruther. SQA Dalkeith is moving. From 21 November 2011 our address will be; Lowden, 24 Wester Shawfair, Dalkeith, Midlothian, EH22 1FD. There is no change to the address for SQA Glasgow. ** This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted by e-mail. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. SQA accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Scottish Qualifications Authority www.sqa.org.uk postmas...@sqa.org.uk ** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ssd quandry
On 10/25/11 3:20 AM, John Doe wrote: Indeed, nice specs. How much does it cost...? it was bundled with a DL180G6 server, I'd have to dig out the quotes to find the controller price, but I'm seeming to remember about $500 -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.3.3 question
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:56:54PM +0200, Baptiste AGASSE wrote: Hi, You must upgrade your box to the latest 5.x version (currently 5.7), the php53 (php 5.3.3) package is provided in the main repo. Can you please learn to properly trim your replies and remove extraneous text? Thank you. As far as php-5.3 the general consensus of those that provide support on the IRC channel is to forgo the CentOS supplied php53 package and instead use the php53u package that is available from the IUS repository. This package doesn't suffer from the drawbacks of the package that Redhat supplied and works out of the box with the support that most people require. Please see http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/ for more information regarding third-party repos in general and a link to the IUS repo. John -- Much of what looks like rudeness in hacker circles is not intended to give offense. Rather, it's the product of the direct, cut-through-the-bullshit communications style that is natural to people who are more concerned about solving problems than making others feel warm and fuzzy. http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html pgpGerLowjLa7.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.3.3 question
On 10/25/11 3:48 AM, bob.anstrut...@sqa.org.uk wrote: Can PHP 5.3.3 be installed on CentOS 5.3, or is it not compatable, and if so what is the recommended version of CentOS to use? First, run yum update to update to 5.7, you're like 2-3 years behind in security and core updates. second, yum install php53 will install 5.3.3 ... this is only available with 5.6 or newer. -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.3.3 question
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:07:07AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: On 10/25/11 3:48 AM, bob.anstrut...@sqa.org.uk wrote: Can PHP 5.3.3 be installed on CentOS 5.3, or is it not compatable, and if so what is the recommended version of CentOS to use? First, run yum update I would _strongly_ caution people to read the release notes for _all_ point releases before updating and to follow the listed recommendations. John -- There is as much difference between us and ourselves as between us and others. -- Michel de Montaigne (1533-1592) French essayist, lawyer, and politician pgpwpIyCkpIq1.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ssd quandry
On 10/25/2011 12:20 PM, John Doe wrote: Guess this new ctrl does not use the cciss module anymore. If it's like a P410i like what I have it uses the hpsa driver. Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ssd quandry
On 10/25/11 4:48 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: On 10/25/2011 12:20 PM, John Doe wrote: Guess this new ctrl does not use the cciss module anymore. If it's like a P410i like what I have it uses the hpsa driver. yes, says as much on that lspci -v output I pasted earlier tonight in this thread. and its exactly like the p410i, just not integrated on the mainboard, instead its a pci-e card. at least, I think it is. these servers came preassembled and I don't recall looking inside when I plonked them on the racks and fired them up. -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] using KVM Virbr0 with bonded nics?
YOu will have to do it on the virbr side, if it does not pick it up automatically. If the bond is set to be your default route, it may just do the right thing. More surprising things have happened... On Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Bob Hoffman wrote: Interested in bonding my 2 on board nics along with my add on card NIC for a total of 3. How would this work with the virtual machines? My eths/IPs --- bond0, bond0:1, etc --- ? virbr0,virbr0:1 (each machine to have own IP address, one machine may have some virtual sites needing more than one ip, so multiple ips added to mix..) add something to the bond0 file, or just leave it alone and mess with the virbr0 files? I heard something about network manager not liking bonding and bridging... anyone do this kind of thing? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Jim Wildman, CISSP, RHCE j...@rossberry.com http://www.rossberry.net Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one. Thomas Paine ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Centos6 sealert browser doesnt appears
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, Im trying to get the sealert browser to show up on my desktop, but I cant get it to work. I have installed all setroubleshoot packages, which provides sealert and im running sealert -b from the command line over a GUI session on gnome and nothing happens. Any ideas? Jeronimo Calvo jeronimocal...@hush.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOpsFjAAoJEGNDE5xD5Cq441UH/22yBoHqSUMS+sN6ARL17fIh KU1Q8sxW9SCVAdx5oDJyGodxGJbIJV2d0zEsK1zczh5Axr76McpWA44PKoWS4ubU 9oa8KQP+fakgmhE+xJzCKig/3CUd4DXd820H4uWJ/vvoy8yIycf+tfFpVfGDOozb rl3j29jQEzp6jL99OVZs/LhqZS0rqBene5Q1741iFdyyXHogyjQErdU0nv1W3RY4 XERaLPPJpohLphmodcYO/D0sQLbVdj9iEwIT+o0yB+dgdn8Wwl1f+z9COlEF2pMI ySql/TqcvNJivNhFnJTUtYxk4DViILJK0ur+kI6CxB3Djh+Fnaxk0CXRcbBnbYg= =n4Uy -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos6 sealert browser doesnt appears
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/2011 10:02 AM, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: Hi folks, Im trying to get the sealert browser to show up on my desktop, but I cant get it to work. I have installed all setroubleshoot packages, which provides sealert and im running sealert -b from the command line over a GUI session on gnome and nothing happens. Any ideas? Run sealert -s to see if it appears. You might also want to clear out the ~/.setroubleshoot file. There have been some bugs where translations have caused setroubleshoot to blow up. A newer version of setroubleshoot will be coming in 6.2. Preview is available in people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL6 Jeronimo Calvo jeronimocal...@hush.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6myg8ACgkQrlYvE4MpobNDmgCfZcIE4Ujfhb4TEGzbHTsqv/KI FloAn2fcXXKsV7FGu9iEhQtbI3bvSrbC =KlET -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba + Openldap
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 12:18 +0200, Giles Coochey wrote: On Fri, October 21, 2011 12:14, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 16:43 -0400, Al wrote: Anyone have an update tutorial/howto for samba to authenticate to ldap? This are lots of docs. But DO NOT DO T. A Samba 3.x DC is very very *obsolete*. The Windows world has moved on to Active Directory. If you want to do that you need Samba 4 - and no OpenLDAP. From the samba Wiki: Samba 4 is currently not yet in a state where it can replace existing production deployments. [1] [1] http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4#Current_Status That is the official story - but try it - it works *BETTER* than an NT4 Samba 3.x domain. Seriously, really. Recent Samba 4 builds *are* in production at several sites. It works. http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO Note that Samba 4 is best discussed on the technical list, not yet on the users list. https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba-technical ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 80, Issue 10
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CEBA-2011:1394 CentOS 5 i386 pdksh FASTTRACK Update
(Johnny Hughes)
2. CEBA-2011:1394 CentOS 5 x86_64 pdksh FASTTRACKUpdate
(Johnny Hughes)
3. CESA-2011:1401 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 xen Update (Johnny Hughes)
4. CESA-2011:1401 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 xen Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:28:51 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:1394 CentOS 5 i386 pdksh
FASTTRACK Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20111024162851.ga21...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1394
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1394.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
3cb8683a5a6420df062776f51d8d6e6c pdksh-5.2.14-37.el5.i386.rpm
Source:
d2f81caabc750fb469dc347c6e050b87 pdksh-5.2.14-37.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:28:51 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:1394 CentOS 5 x86_64 pdksh
FASTTRACK Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20111024162851.ga21...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1394
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1394.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
a593bc8aad177aece733e362e743f554 pdksh-5.2.14-37.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
d2f81caabc750fb469dc347c6e050b87 pdksh-5.2.14-37.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:56:22 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1401 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 xen
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20111024175622.ga27...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1401 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1401.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
cecdd37b7b097d230d649eabbc3d26cf xen-3.0.3-132.el5_7.2.i386.rpm
1b035d24ae62134306e07641b2ff0585 xen-devel-3.0.3-132.el5_7.2.i386.rpm
43512c53d1a866f56316c8e4d2ff0329 xen-libs-3.0.3-132.el5_7.2.i386.rpm
Source:
9143b641eedebf769c4a2f2316a77f98 xen-3.0.3-132.el5_7.2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:56:22 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1401 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 xen
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20111024175622.ga27...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1401 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1401.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
ad399be12c8df4cef9923f1e2b080011 xen-3.0.3-132.el5_7.2.x86_64.rpm
1b035d24ae62134306e07641b2ff0585 xen-devel-3.0.3-132.el5_7.2.i386.rpm
f6de20689de3f7249824e3b3f0bad3d7 xen-devel-3.0.3-132.el5_7.2.x86_64.rpm
43512c53d1a866f56316c8e4d2ff0329 xen-libs-3.0.3-132.el5_7.2.i386.rpm
2de8661d6ae7a932fccd6a640c7f451d xen-libs-3.0.3-132.el5_7.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
9143b641eedebf769c4a2f2316a77f98 xen-3.0.3-132.el5_7.2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 80, Issue 10
***
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Re: [CentOS] Centos6 sealert browser doesnt appears
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25 Oct 2011, at 15:39, Daniel J Walsh wrote: On 10/25/2011 10:02 AM, Jeronimo Calvo wrote: Hi folks, Im trying to get the sealert browser to show up on my desktop, but I cant get it to work. I have installed all setroubleshoot packages, which provides sealert and im running sealert -b from the command line over a GUI session on gnome and nothing happens. Any ideas? Run sealert -s to see if it appears. You might also want to clear out the ~/.setroubleshoot file. There have been some bugs where translations have caused setroubleshoot to blow up. A newer version of setroubleshoot will be coming in 6.2. Preview is available in people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL6 I have tried, but still no luck: [root@localhost iscariote]# sealert -sv 2011-10-25 10:15:03,024 [program.ERROR] exception ImportError: No module named gui_utils Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/sealert, line 976, in module from setroubleshoot.gui_utils import * ImportError: No module named gui_utils Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/sealert, line 1028, in module from setroubleshoot.gui_utils import * ImportError: No module named gui_utils [root@localhost iscariote]# sealert -vb 2011-10-25 10:15:10,870 [dbus.ERROR] could not start dbus: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOpu8BAAoJEGNDE5xD5Cq4ALwH/R2Rv1X00gf3AyGlAO1b9eW8 aP8MT91xDFpOWNDHx1/ExduNqxtY0l5ArkAxXSteYX2oXtf+qhIBw8j5zNbdNEIX i8WmURLzAf757pxBACkvP6gejHWwoWBjBS3T2A2KzHCyVhvLG5+Ce1gO2KH8HpC7 vUfDhrBLgFGnvcbxq5BVJGjn0G7nHgYECboFNA9A8Je5ZShA9zsnzGV9lRQ4AKZf /lacG2/2KJVHwNJds0dg7rxoBw7hzPUm8eK4AGTg5LX4fPCx85W+6zaLDPn6aXnY 2rrnx+zVCDxztXOKX+qv/2r2OP/qVKcDSsOlpVprscer4knACw3dFZidr3t/m1Q= =DNFF -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] using KVM Virbr0 with bonded nics?
Jim Wildman wrote - YOu will have to do it on the virbr side, if it does not pick it up automatically. If the bond is set to be your default route, it may just do the right thing. More surprising things have happened... On Mon, 24 Oct 2011, Bob Hoffman wrote: / Interested in bonding my 2 on board nics along with my add on card NIC // for a total of 3.// // How would this work with the virtual machines? // My eths/IPs --- bond0, bond0:1, etc --- ? virbr0,virbr0:1 // (each machine to have own IP address, one machine may have some virtual // sites needing more than one ip, // so multiple ips added to mix..)// //add something to the bond0 file, or just leave it alone and mess with // the virbr0 files? // I heard something about network manager not liking bonding and bridging... // anyone do this kind of thing? / - Still working on a solution. Apparently the bondn files demand an ipaddress, thus there might have to be one for each and every single ip coming into the computer...I guess you would have to do that anyway just like eth0, eth0:0, eth0:1, etc. I think I am going to try to just make a separate ethn for each ip, going to their respective bondn with the proper ipaddress in them. Then use the bridge as normal, with each bondn calling a respective bridge. Not sure how that works with multiple ips going to same machine (as in, can the bridge handle more than one ip, or can the machine look for more than one bridge...?) Then obviously, the VM would need to go through the whole process too. I can see no other way and there is no information out there going over any of it...will post if it works. (next step after figuring out lvm kvm storage issues.wheee) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] using KVM Virbr0 with bonded nics?
On 10/25/2011 10:48 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote: Still working on a solution. Apparently the bondn files demand an ipaddress, thus there might have to be one for each and every single ip coming into the computer...I guess you would have to do that anyway just like eth0, eth0:0, eth0:1, etc. I think I am going to try to just make a separate ethn for each ip, going to their respective bondn with the proper ipaddress in them. Then use the bridge as normal, with each bondn calling a respective bridge Not sure how that works with multiple ips going to same machine (as in, can the bridge handle more than one ip, or can the machine look for more than one bridge...?) For various reasons I base my host machines on Ubuntu 10.04-LTS and run CentOS under KVM. My bonded/bridged host configuration looks like this. You will have to figure out the CentOS equivalents. # The primary network interface iface eth0 inet manual iface eth1 inet manual # eth0 eth1 form bond0 for x.x.x.0/25 subnet auto bond0 iface bond0 inet static bond_miimon 100 bond_mode active-backup bond_downdelay 200 bond_updelay 200 address x.x.x.35 netmask 255.255.255.128 network x.x.x.0 post-up ifenslave bond0 eth0 eth1 pre-down ifenslave -d bond0 eth0 eth1 auto br0 iface br0 inet static bridge_ports bond0 address x.x.x.35 netmask 255.255.255.128 network x.x.x.0 gateway x.x.x.126 I then configured the virtual interface for each virtual machine like this: interface type='bridge' mac address='xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'/ source bridge='br0'/ model type='virtio'/ /interface and configured each machine using regular 'eth0'. Don't forget to make sure forwarding is turned on and that your firewall on the host machine allows FORWARD chain packets to the bridged interface. -- Benjamin Franz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba + Openldap
On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:38 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Samba 4 is currently not yet in a state where it can replace existing production deployments. [1] [1] http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4#Current_Status That is the official story - but try it - it works *BETTER* than an NT4 Samba 3.x domain. Seriously, really. Recent Samba 4 builds *are* in production at several sites. It works. http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO Note that Samba 4 is best discussed on the technical list, not yet on the users list. /me salutes the white mice that will make samba4 better and completely ready to take over the Windows AD service. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba + Openldap
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 07:57 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:38 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Samba 4 is currently not yet in a state where it can replace existing production deployments. [1] [1] http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4#Current_Status That is the official story - but try it - it works *BETTER* than an NT4 Samba 3.x domain. Seriously, really. Recent Samba 4 builds *are* in production at several sites. It works. http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO Note that Samba 4 is best discussed on the technical list, not yet on the users list. /me salutes the white mice that will make samba4 better and completely ready to take over the Windows AD service. You can already have a mix of Samba 4 and Windows 2008R2 domain controllers in the same domain. If you create an S3 domain you face the grisly prospects of having to upgrade that domain to an S4/AD domain someday. Which is *not* fun. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba + Openldap
On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:16 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 07:57 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:38 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Samba 4 is currently not yet in a state where it can replace existing production deployments. [1] [1] http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4#Current_Status That is the official story - but try it - it works *BETTER* than an NT4 Samba 3.x domain. Seriously, really. Recent Samba 4 builds *are* in production at several sites. It works. http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO Note that Samba 4 is best discussed on the technical list, not yet on the users list. /me salutes the white mice that will make samba4 better and completely ready to take over the Windows AD service. You can already have a mix of Samba 4 and Windows 2008R2 domain controllers in the same domain. I know...but I wanna not have to have any Windows AD. If you create an S3 domain you face the grisly prospects of having to upgrade that domain to an S4/AD domain someday. Which is *not* fun. Thanks. I'll stick with the current Windows 2000 AD until samba4 is ready! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba + Openldap
I'm still going to stick to trying to get Samba3 and try and get openldap to work. I've got it going in my test environment with a clean install of samba and openldap. I'm currently making the modifications to a dev. version of the production ldap database to see if I can get it working with Samba3. I'm not worried about Active Directory, openldap works with our environment. Thanks for the suggestions! On Oct 25, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 12:18 +0200, Giles Coochey wrote: On Fri, October 21, 2011 12:14, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 16:43 -0400, Al wrote: Anyone have an update tutorial/howto for samba to authenticate to ldap? This are lots of docs. But DO NOT DO T. A Samba 3.x DC is very very *obsolete*. The Windows world has moved on to Active Directory. If you want to do that you need Samba 4 - and no OpenLDAP. From the samba Wiki: Samba 4 is currently not yet in a state where it can replace existing production deployments. [1] [1] http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4#Current_Status That is the official story - but try it - it works *BETTER* than an NT4 Samba 3.x domain. Seriously, really. Recent Samba 4 builds *are* in production at several sites. It works. http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO Note that Samba 4 is best discussed on the technical list, not yet on the users list. https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba-technical ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
