[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0687 CentOS 6 tcsh Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0687
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0687.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
7fd5609316d0075b50bbf1b2bd28f84bcf1a3aa093eda16779bab0bc31ff75c9
tcsh-6.17-19.el6_2.i686.rpm
x86_64:
5c1e42ef8c09a69a5ace2816efc5f012958619574697c1ee627f1241732644ad
tcsh-6.17-19.el6_2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
93f506843d03a70269cb447708b34c1d99671cd6d87b5590dc6f652f7d7411e4
tcsh-6.17-19.el6_2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2012:0689 CentOS 5 tzdata Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0689
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0689.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
51e6aa9e590d99c5e701b16df17b28a69e20f913d183abd16e170382d6ed25ef
tzdata-2012c-1.el5.i386.rpm
7bd6b84dc1bcd0c8024f7b787fe6caac501fb0483a730bbac6ec5a95d9e9d2c2
tzdata-java-2012c-1.el5.i386.rpm
x86_64:
8c987cb46e810c34d586c35a2d33e14fdf907fccd41d40434374bba427beb37d
tzdata-2012c-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
9c1e847aa79a26e892ed7afd11bf474b1e8b9c32c827a369deb73b7d6417e7a2
tzdata-java-2012c-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
127684a8135f7754c3d13108b8da9791beb77614c00fe153acd40a5ba970d605
tzdata-2012c-1.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2012:0689 CentOS 6 tzdata Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0689
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0689.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
74f8a6ef475e53903eae45e3272dcdb6488633611b2c96737484cac9339ae138
tzdata-2012c-1.el6.noarch.rpm
e03810219bfb33a93350c102219d38a30d07e204ce4f665a902ebad8fa574432
tzdata-java-2012c-1.el6.noarch.rpm
x86_64:
acde065b30b20598ced3e622d99871d4d0d8dcdc046c8bbf02d3d9b6b90ee5ea
tzdata-2012c-1.el6.noarch.rpm
7f33b9cbc30bfcf10f7db984dfbb925037728179ee0b0112944189ff9ed70077
tzdata-java-2012c-1.el6.noarch.rpm
Source:
e2d9a7a0016c3f34db1b6bb93fc6e55eeea71aa214f8d00a35a39c9b97315d99
tzdata-2012c-1.el6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS] Secure VNC access from iPad
On 23/05/12 2:32 PM, david wrote: If any of you have been successful in using an iPad as a VNC client with SSH tunnelling, I'd love to know how it's done. I have tried using the iSSH application, but without success. I know that the server is accessible from a Windows client (using TigerVNC), via an SSH tunnel, so the server is properly configured. If you have a working example, please let me know what magic sauce you used. I use iTeleport. The security settings inside it let me set up the ssh tunnel and which port the VNC server is running. iTeleport seems to work with Linux, MacOSX and Windoze VNC servers no problem. It even lets me set up an ssh tunnel to a gateway machine and then port forward to other machines behind the firewall. The general procedure is: 1) create a new connection 2) set the name and port of the machine that is running VNC. NOTE: this does not have to be the same as the SSH gateway. 3) In security go to encryption and select SSH. This is the machine that is running SSH and as I said it can be a gateway machine or the VNC itself. 4) Select the OS you are connecting to. I suspect that iTeleport has different click settings depending on what you are connecting to. You are now done. Good luck, -pete -- Peter Brady Email: pdbr...@ans.com.au Skype: pbrady77 Mobile: +61 410 490 797 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS in the world
for all, thanks you very much about your information :) -- http://mafatahna.web.id @mafatahna ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Repositories in CentOS 5.8
On 22.5.2012 20:18, Les Mikesell wrote: On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Markus Falb markus.f...@fasel.at wrote: There are a lot of 3rd party repositories around, and my understanding is that the only sane way is not to trust a whole repository but only selected and therefore tested packages. Consequently though you will have to maintain your own repository. But with EPEL and others with policies to not overwrite base packages, you won't get anything that you didn't explicitly install (assuming you trust them to follow their policy...). There are repositories that might not have such policies. There are rpm downloads that are not yum-ified. -- Kind Regards, Markus Falb ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - vnc - authentication is required to set the network proxy used for downloading packages
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 23:24 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:11:43 -0600 Frank Cox wrote: So what am I missing? Best way I found was to remove PackageKit and all its packages (Desktops it causes a major user whine and loads of complaints). I think I've found it. I ran gnome-session-properties and un-checked PackageKit Update Applet That'll work also but for that one user account I just restarted vncserver and this time I don't have that annoying window popping up on my remote desktop. So it appears that's the fix. Also yes packagekitd is a binary but controled by DBUS. I think that is just silly because it has no service command to stop it. Stopping 'dbus' should take care of it but then you will prolly be stopping really needed things. John signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Reset adapter
Hi, one of our rented root-server has a problem with the network-adapter.The network is interrupted from time to time and i can not longer connect to our server. We can only reboote (remote) the server and restart the network. I think it was an network-driver-problem from an Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network --- e1000e But now i have install a new kernel-driver and i have the same problem again. Here an extract of the logs: ---//first log with old driver//--- May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 1.4.4-k May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: e1000e: Copyright(c) 1999 - 2011 Intel Corporation. May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: e1000e :04:00.0: Disabling ASPM L0s May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: e1000e :04:00.0: PCI INT A - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 16 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: scsi 0:1:0:0: Direct-Access TOSHIBA MBF245LRC6104 PQ: 1 ANSI: 5 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: scsi 0:1:1:0: Direct-Access TOSHIBA MBF245LRC6104 PQ: 1 ANSI: 5 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: usb 1-1.2: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 3 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: scsi 0:3:0:0: Enclosure ADAPTEC Virtual SGPIO PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3092.973 MHz. May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: Switching to clocksource tsc May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: e1000e :04:00.0: eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GT/s:Width x1) 00:25:90:75:ad:38 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: e1000e :04:00.0: eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: e1000e :04:00.0: eth0: MAC: 3, PHY: 8, PBA No: FF-0FF May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: e1000e :05:00.0: Disabling ASPM L0s May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: e1000e :05:00.0: PCI INT A - GSI 18 (level, low) - IRQ 18 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: usb 1-1.2: New USB device found, idVendor=0557, idProduct=2221 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: usb 1-1.2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: usb 1-1.2: Product: Hermon USB hidmouse Device May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: usb 1-1.2: Manufacturer: Winbond Electronics Corp May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: usb 1-1.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: input: Winbond Electronics Corp Hermon USB hidmouse Device as /devices/pci:00/:00:1a.0/usb1/1-1/1-1.2/1-1.2:1.0/input/input4 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: generic-usb 0003:0557:2221.0001: input,hidraw0: USB HID v1.00 Mouse [Winbond Electronics Corp Hermon USB hidmouse Device] on usb-:00:1a.0-1.2/input0 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: input: Winbond Electronics Corp Hermon USB hidmouse Device as /devices/pci:00/:00:1a.0/usb1/1-1/1-1.2/1-1.2:1.1/input/input5 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: generic-usb 0003:0557:2221.0002: input,hidraw1: USB HID v1.00 Keyboard [Winbond Electronics Corp Hermon USB hidmouse Device] on usb-:00:1a.0-1.2/input1 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: input: ImPS/2 Generic Wheel Mouse as /devices/platform/i8042/serio1/input/input6 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: e1000e :05:00.0: eth1: (PCI Express:2.5GT/s:Width x1) 00:25:90:75:ad:39 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: e1000e :05:00.0: eth1: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: e1000e :05:00.0: eth1: MAC: 3, PHY: 8, PBA No: FF-0FF May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: scsi: waiting for bus probes to complete ... May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 878686208 512-byte logical blocks: (449 GB/418 GiB) May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, supports DPO and FUA May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: sda: sda1 sda2 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI removable disk May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: dracut: Scanning devices sda2 for LVM logical volumes vg_r378120301/lv_root vg_r378120301/lv_swap May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: dracut: inactive '/dev/vg_r378120301/lv_root' [50.00 GiB] inherit May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: dracut: inactive '/dev/vg_r378120301/lv_home' [358.70 GiB] inherit May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: dracut: inactive '/dev/vg_r378120301/lv_swap' [9.80 GiB] inherit May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: dracut: Mounted root filesystem /dev/mapper/vg_r378120301-lv_root May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: SELinux: Disabled at runtime. May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: type=1404 audit(1337698352.963:2): selinux=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: dracut: May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: dracut: Switching root May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: udev: starting version 147 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: scsi 0:1:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0 May 22 16:52:40 mega2 kernel: scsi 0:1:1:0: Attached scsi generic
Re: [CentOS] 200 Stream not found errors in flash player and firefox
Rob, what are you doing to get the error message? I.e., what command or application are you invoking and where does the 200 Stream error appear? I've been having problems with flashplayer also-- for a long time and over many upgrades. When, using firefox, I visit a site which invokes flashplayer, the cpu load begins to increase it can go from 0.4 to 6.8. If I then close the tab to that site, the cpu load goes back down to where it was. I've talked with friends who use Mac OS X and Windows and they both experience similar problems with flashplayer, so I always assumed it was something in flash. On 05/21/2012 11:09 PM Rob Kampen wrote: Hi List, I have been getting the above errors for the last few months and extensive google foo has been less than conclusive - but indicates that the requesting flash player is somehow putting the wrong url content into the request. After I recently did a yum update on my wife's laptop she too started getting these errors. She has an old sony laptop running 5.8 and other than this error on various streaming tv links it is working just fine. Needless to say, she is less than thrilled with my IT skills at this point as she can no longer watch her favourite TV programs. So I decided to try and track down the problem on my own machine (CentOS 6.2) where yumex allows you to see and load older versions of a package. I started with a downgrade (and then a 2nd one and then the 5th one) of libflashplayer.so - fortunately rpmforge has older versions. Going right back to a 10.x version did not fix the problem. Thus I guess it is a firefox / xulrunner problem, however I am not happy to go back too many versions here as the exploit potential is much higher. Then I tried konqueror with flash enabled and guess what - no problems with any of the links that fail under firefox / libflashplayer. So my question to the list members - does anyone else have this problem with flash under firefox?? What do I do to fix it? TIA Rob ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] openldap mmr + heartbeat hot standby
Hi List, I've setup 2 openldap servers in n-way multimaster replication mode in a test environment, both run centos 6.2, this works well but now i'm trying to make these 2 servers failover using heartbeat. i've got no experience with heartbeat (or setting up clusters in general) however from what i understand heartbeat starts/stops the service if the server has the virtual IP assigned or not. this would be fine for httpd , but since replication doesn't work when slapd is stopped i was wondering if anyone knows if there is a way to setup heartbeat with a hot standby? so that the service keeps running but the ip does gets reassigned when one goes down. Thanks, Wessel ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Repositories in CentOS 5.8
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Markus Falb markus.f...@fasel.at wrote: There are a lot of 3rd party repositories around, and my understanding is that the only sane way is not to trust a whole repository but only selected and therefore tested packages. Consequently though you will have to maintain your own repository. But with EPEL and others with policies to not overwrite base packages, you won't get anything that you didn't explicitly install (assuming you trust them to follow their policy...). There are repositories that might not have such policies. There are rpm downloads that are not yum-ified. Agreed - and the most likely source of conflicts is when you have installed packages from 2 different 3rd party repositories or unrelated sources. Normally any single source will test against a stock RHEL base, but not other 3rd party packages, and when package dependencies change in future updates you have the potential for conflicts. Not even copying packages to your own repository can ensure that packages from multiple different sources will be able to track future updates without conflicts. But, EPEL is fairly safe by itself and has a huge number of packages that are maintained pretty well. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Tomcat7
Hello Does anyone know where I can find a repository with Centos6 Tomcat7? Thanks. -- Rudinei Dias ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] openldap mmr + heartbeat hot standby
Wessel van der Aart wrote: Hi List, I've setup 2 openldap servers in n-way multimaster replication mode in a test environment, both run centos 6.2, this works well but now i'm trying to make these 2 servers failover using heartbeat. i've got no experience with heartbeat (or setting up clusters in general) however from what i understand heartbeat starts/stops the service if the server has the virtual IP assigned or not. this would be fine for httpd , but since replication doesn't work when slapd is stopped i was wondering if anyone knows if there is a way to setup heartbeat with a hot standby? so that the service keeps running but the ip does gets reassigned when one goes down. A slight clarification: what happens on a failover cluster is that you've got heartbeat running, and each machine looks to see if the other's still alive. At this point, one is live, and the other's standby. If/when the standby notices it cannot see - even a ping - the other address, or it can be configured to look for a service, such as doing a default search (for apache, that might be a wget ImAlive.html) - it tells the system to assert the IP, and turns up all services for which it's been configured. I haven't done it, but I'd say you could easily configure heartbeat to check, and if the IP's visible, but the service times out, to tell the live one to turn down services, and to take over primaryhood. Hope that's clearer. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Tomcat7
On 23/5/2012 4:13 μμ, Rudinei Dias wrote: Does anyone know where I can find a repository with Centos6 Tomcat7? Check this: http://www.distrotips.com/centos/installing-tomcat-7-on-centos-6.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Tomcat7
Hi. This I had found. The first thing to do is google search. I've had bad experiences mess configuration caused by not using RPM on Centos installers. Even so, thanks. The question is if anyone knows where you have a RPM repository for the tomcat7 HREL6/EL6. - Rudinei Dias 2012/5/23 Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr On 23/5/2012 4:13 μμ, Rudinei Dias wrote: Does anyone know where I can find a repository with Centos6 Tomcat7? Check this: http://www.distrotips.com/**centos/installing-tomcat-7-on-** centos-6.htmlhttp://www.distrotips.com/centos/installing-tomcat-7-on-centos-6.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Repositories in CentOS 5.8
On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 12:17:07 PM Kaushal Shriyan wrote: I am running Cent OS 5.8 in production. Can someone please explain me about various repositories available in CentOS 5.8 and which third party repos ( http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories) i should use it in Production environment. You've already gotten some excellent advice about this, but I'd like to add a few things, starting with a list of just a few factoids I've observed about repos and repo mixing: 1.) EPEL doesn't make it a priority (or even a goal) to work well with any other third-party repository; 2.) The mixability of other repos varies, with both repoforge/RPMforge and ELrepo taking pains to not overwrite base repo packages unless you enable their 'extras' sub-repos (others may as well, I'm speaking from my own experience, and the repos I use the most are EPEL, repoforge, and ELrepo, and so I'm not even going to comment about the mixability of others, like remi, IUS, ATrpms, or others since I have either insufficient or old information about them); 3.) At least one useful repository that I use on certain production machines, the CERT Forensics repo, relies on both EPEL and RPMforge/repoforge, so look carefully at the mixing issues of each of your selected repos' upstream repo dependencies; 4.) Random mixing of packages (like random downloads from pkgs.org) is certain to cause problems; 5.) The fewer the number of repos you use the more stable your package set will be. That is especially true if you mix 'specialty' repos like OpenNMS and PacketFence (or even slightly off the wall ones like LinuxTech (which has a usable handbrake for CentOS 6, for instance)), or upstream repos like the one from the PostgreSQL RPM building project to get the latest PostgreSQL on you system; 6.) There is no such thing in repositories as 'one size fits all.' What will fit your needs depends a great deal on what 'production' is defined to be in your specific instance. (For a server in 'production' that is serving typical network service loads (file, print, web, e-mail, databases, etc) you're going to need some specific things (where 'things' is defined as the set of packages and interdependencies between packages). A 'production' research/development desktop (we have a few here) will need different things; a 'production' embedded machine controller (we have a couple of those, too) will need yet another different set of things.); 7.) You really need to look at the packages that you need for your application and then individually investigate which repo or repos has the packages that you need, built the way you need them. And look at the longevity of the repo; both RPMforge/repoforge and EPEL, for instance, have been around a while and are pretty well maintained; 8.) The recommendations on the CentOS Wiki repositories page are very good starting points, but what you specifically need in production is something you'll need to determine for yourself after doing some testing with different repos. And I'd keep some testing machines or VM's available to test various repos over time to see how they work or don't work with each other, and you might even want to build your own repository, depending upon your specific critieria; 9.) Don't mix from-source (./configure;make;make install) installed packages and packages from repositories unless: a.) You know exactly what you're doing; b.) The from-source package builds all its own dependencies (like Plone does); c.) The from-source package's author won't support it otherwise. 10.) Learn to use yum and its tools effectively to keep mixing issues at bay (priorities, plugins, and the command line parameters to enable and disable individual repositories as needed are the ones to start with); Now, a non-factoid observation: if you think about it, it's quite an amazing thing that so many people are so willing to keep repositories of packages up to date at no cost to the end-user, given the very definite benefit and value of those updates (which is why I can't really complain if a repo is a little out of date, or if two repos that aren't costing me any opex won't mix just the way I want them to) and the very real cost to the maintainer, in terms of time, stress, frustration, and money. Having kept packages up to date for public consumption before, I understand all too well the trials of a packager and the entitlement syndrome some users seem to have. And thus my last recommendation: 11.) be prepared to do some work on your own to make different repositories work together for you, and be patient with the maintainers of those repositories when they don't work together the way you might like. They don't have to listen to you, but most will listen if you approach them the right way, respectfully acknowledging their valuable contribution to your bottom line. YMMV, FWIW, IMHO, HTH, etc.
Re: [CentOS] Tomcat7
On 05/23/2012 05:24 PM, Rudinei Dias wrote: The question is if anyone knows where you have a RPM repository for the tomcat7 HREL6/EL6. I dream of the existence of a repository I just activate and issue $ sudo yum install @tomcat Like this one http://www.how2centos.com/installing-tomcat-6-on-centos-5-5-tutorial/ but on CentOS6 for Tomcat 7. -- RMA. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 87, Issue 13
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CEBA-2012:0687 CentOS 6 tcsh Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CEEA-2012:0689 CentOS 5 tzdata Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 10:38:13 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0687 CentOS 6 tcsh Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20120523103813.ga13...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0687
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0687.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
7fd5609316d0075b50bbf1b2bd28f84bcf1a3aa093eda16779bab0bc31ff75c9
tcsh-6.17-19.el6_2.i686.rpm
x86_64:
5c1e42ef8c09a69a5ace2816efc5f012958619574697c1ee627f1241732644ad
tcsh-6.17-19.el6_2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
93f506843d03a70269cb447708b34c1d99671cd6d87b5590dc6f652f7d7411e4
tcsh-6.17-19.el6_2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 13:47:40 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2012:0689 CentOS 5 tzdata Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20120523134740.ga23...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0689
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0689.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
51e6aa9e590d99c5e701b16df17b28a69e20f913d183abd16e170382d6ed25ef
tzdata-2012c-1.el5.i386.rpm
7bd6b84dc1bcd0c8024f7b787fe6caac501fb0483a730bbac6ec5a95d9e9d2c2
tzdata-java-2012c-1.el5.i386.rpm
x86_64:
8c987cb46e810c34d586c35a2d33e14fdf907fccd41d40434374bba427beb37d
tzdata-2012c-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
9c1e847aa79a26e892ed7afd11bf474b1e8b9c32c827a369deb73b7d6417e7a2
tzdata-java-2012c-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
127684a8135f7754c3d13108b8da9791beb77614c00fe153acd40a5ba970d605
tzdata-2012c-1.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 87, Issue 13
***
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Repositories in CentOS 5.8
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote: 1.) EPEL doesn't make it a priority (or even a goal) to work well with any other third-party repository; True enough as a fact, but it sort-of sounds like a criticism for something that's not really practical. Normally packages would be accepted into EPEL if they meet the guidelines and there is usually some reason if they are elsewhere. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Repositories in CentOS 5.8
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 01:11:54 PM Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote: 1.) EPEL doesn't make it a priority (or even a goal) to work well with any other third-party repository; True enough as a fact, but it sort-of sounds like a criticism for something that's not really practical. I'll just point to the EPEL section of the wiki.centos.org Repositories page, and let that say almost all that really needs to be said, other than I will say that I chose my wording for that sentence rather carefully, since I didn't want it to sound like a complaint, and only hit send after making multiple revisions. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] biggest disk partition on 5.8?
Hey folks, I have a Sun J4400 SAS1 disk array with 24 x 1T drives in it connected to a Sunfire x2250 running 5.8 ( 64 bit ) I used 'arcconf' to create a big RAID60 out of (see below). But then I mount it and it is way too small This should be about 20TB : [root@solexa1 StorMan]# df -h /dev/sdb1 FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 186G 60M 176G 1% /mnt/J4400-1 Here is how I created it : ./arcconf create 1 logicaldrive name J4400-1-RAID60 max 60 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 10 0 11 0 12 0 13 0 14 0 15 0 16 0 17 0 18 0 19 0 20 0 21 0 22 0 23 noprompt [root@solexa1 StorMan]# ./arcconf getconfig 1 ld Controllers found: 1 -- Logical device information -- Logical device number 0 Logical device name : J4400-1-RAID60 RAID level : 60 XOR Status of logical device : Impacted Size : 19066880 MB Stripe-unit size : 256 KB Read-cache mode : Enabled Write-cache mode : Enabled (write-back) Write-cache setting : Enabled (write-back) when protected by battery Partitioned : Yes Protected by Hot-Spare : No Bootable : Yes Failed stripes : No Logical device segment information Group 0, Segment 0 : Present (0,0) 9QJ3ZAYQ Group 0, Segment 1 : Present (0,1) 9QJ3ZP3Y Group 0, Segment 2 : Present (0,2) 9QJ3X7GR Group 0, Segment 3 : Present (0,3) 9QJ3XJQW Group 0, Segment 4 : Present (0,4) 9QJ3TPK2 Group 0, Segment 5 : Present (0,5) 9QJ40PHP Group 0, Segment 6 : Present (0,6) GTE002PBHJEDBE Group 0, Segment 7 : Present (0,7) 9QJ3ZHE0 Group 0, Segment 8 : Present (0,8) 9QJ3Z053 Group 0, Segment 9 : Present (0,9) 9QJ3ZEX6 Group 0, Segment 10 : Present (0,10) 9QJ33XGG Group 0, Segment 11 : Present (0,11) 9QJ3X88X Group 1, Segment 0 : Present (0,12) 9QJ3YLR2 Group 1, Segment 1 : Present (0,13) GTE002PBHHNVZE Group 1, Segment 2 : Present (0,14) 9QJ3ZGM2 Group 1, Segment 3 : Present (0,15) GTE002PBGP9VZE Group 1, Segment 4 : Present (0,16) 9QJ3ZB4X Group 1, Segment 5 : Present (0,17) 9QJ3ZAE0 Group 1, Segment 6 : Present (0,18) 9QJ3Y8C8 Group 1, Segment 7 : Present (0,19) GTE002PBH30GKE Group 1, Segment 8 : Present (0,20) GTE002PAKXKDPE Group 1, Segment 9 : Present (0,21) 9QJ3VXEL Group 1, Segment 10 : Present (0,22) 9QJ3W4W6 Group 1, Segment 11 : Present (0,23) 9QJ3TPGR Make 1 big partition : sfdisk /dev/sdb EOF ,,L EOF [root@solexa1 StorMan]# sfdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 2430685 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track Units = cylinders of 8225280 bytes, blocks of 1024 bytes, counting from 0 Device Boot Start End #cyls#blocks Id System /dev/sdb1 0+ 24540- 24541- 197124430 83 Linux /dev/sdb2 0 - 0 00 Empty /dev/sdb3 0 - 0 00 Empty /dev/sdb4 0 - 0 00 Empty And then make an ext4 filesystem on that : [root@solexa1 StorMan]# mke4fs /dev/sdb1 mke4fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) Filesystem label= OS type: Linux Block size=4096 (log=2) Fragment size=4096 (log=2) Stride=0 blocks, Stripe width=0 blocks 12320768 inodes, 49281107 blocks 2464055 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user First data block=0 Maximum filesystem blocks=4294967296 1504 block groups 32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group 8192 inodes per group Superblock backups stored on blocks: 32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208, 4096000, 7962624, 11239424, 2048, 23887872 Writing inode tables: done Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done This filesystem will be automatically checked every 30 mounts or 180 days, whichever comes first. Use tune4fs -c or -i to override. -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org
Re: [CentOS] biggest disk partition on 5.8?
Damn, should have checked the archives first (had been looking at Centos and RHEL docs but no luck) Looks like 16TB is the limit? -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] pvcreate limitations on big disks?
OK folks, I'm back at it again. Instead of taking my J4400 ( 24 x 1T
disks) and making a big RAID60 out of it which Linux cannot make a
filesystem on, I'm created 4 x RAID6 which each are 3.64T
I then do :
sfdisk /dev/sd{b,c,d,e} EOF
,,8e
EOF
to make a big LVM partition on each one.
But then when I do :
pvcreate /dev/sd{b,c,d,e}1
and then
pvdisplay
It shows each one as only half its actual size.
But if I take the last one and wipe the partition table and just do
pvcreate on the entire disk, it works
pvcreate /dev/sde
And then if I take the results from that and use the size to force a
size on another PV I get it right too
pvcreate /dev/sdd1 --setphysicalvolumesize=3.64T
I'd use the entire disk expect that this seems dangerous to me because
you do sfdisk -l and the disk appears to have no partition table
which might entice someone to thing it is unused.
And I'm not sure whether it is safe to use setphysicalvolumesize.
Anyone know for sure?
What are my alternatives?
/dev/sdb1 is a new physical volume of 1.64 TB
--- NEW Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/sdb1
VG Name
PV Size 1.64 TB
Allocatable NO
PE Size (KByte) 0
Total PE 0
Free PE 0
Allocated PE 0
PV UUID 7bzxpQ-Md1o-Z73g-YzLX-xxj7-nszh-LucEFW
/dev/sdc1 is a new physical volume of 1.64 TB
--- NEW Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/sdc1
VG Name
PV Size 1.64 TB
Allocatable NO
PE Size (KByte) 0
Total PE 0
Free PE 0
Allocated PE 0
PV UUID tlpJ6A-LPs1-NFbl-h1AZ-5aBX-yOuO-phcwWD
/dev/sdd1 is a new physical volume of 3.64 TB
--- NEW Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/sdd1
VG Name
PV Size 3.64 TB
Allocatable NO
PE Size (KByte) 0
Total PE 0
Free PE 0
Allocated PE 0
PV UUID ifwmQQ-AOvK-Ke6L-2gEy-aJgJ-bb8d-DaJJDD
/dev/sde is a new physical volume of 3.64 TB
--- NEW Physical volume ---
PV Name /dev/sde
VG Name
PV Size 3.64 TB
Allocatable NO
PE Size (KByte) 0
Total PE 0
Free PE 0
Allocated PE 0
PV UUID VPptAS-CFul-Awe9-TI7E-W9jq-zVdx-1mJjDR
[root@solexa1 ~]#
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] pvcreate limitations on big disks?
Em 23-05-2012 16:24, Alan McKay escreveu:
OK folks, I'm back at it again. Instead of taking my J4400 ( 24 x 1T
disks) and making a big RAID60 out of it which Linux cannot make a
filesystem on, I'm created 4 x RAID6 which each are 3.64T
I then do :
sfdisk /dev/sd{b,c,d,e} EOF
,,8e
EOF
to make a big LVM partition on each one.
But then when I do :
pvcreate /dev/sd{b,c,d,e}1
and then
pvdisplay
It shows each one as only half its actual size.
You need to use GPT partition table to manage above 2TB.
Traditional DOS partition can't manage above 2TB.
fdisk can't work with GPT, it's possible sfdisk don't work too.
Try using parted /dev/device, and
mklabel GPT
--
Marcelo Beckmann
Suporte Corporativo - supo...@webers.com.br
Webers Tecnologia - http://www.webers.com.br
Curitiba (PR) (41) 3094-6600
Rio de Janeiro (RJ) (21) 4007-1207
São Paulo (SP) (11) 4007-1207
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] biggest disk partition on 5.8?
On 05/23/2012 01:25 PM, Alan McKay wrote: Damn, should have checked the archives first (had been looking at Centos and RHEL docs but no luck) Looks like 16TB is the limit? http://wiki.centos.org/About/Product Indeed 16TB is the ext3 limit. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum problem with glibc
Johnny Hughes wrote:
---
Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 !=
glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.i686
** Found 3 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows:
bash-4.1.2-9.el6_2.x86_64 is a duplicate with
bash-4.1.2-8.el6.centos.x86_64 glibc-common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 is
a duplicate with glibc- common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.x86_64
glibc-common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 has missing requires of glibc =
('0', '2.12', '1.47.el6_2.12')
---
I've tried rpm --rebuilddb but that did not seem to help.
Any suggestions or advice gratefully received.
You have both the i686 and x86_64 versions of glibc installed. That
error means that the repo you are trying to update from has a different
version of i686 glibc and x86_64 glibc ... or you are trying to upgrade
one (the x86_64 version) and not the other (the i686 version).
Since multilib installs share some files (all the Documentation, etc.),
that means you must install the same version of each arch if you install
both i686 and x86_64 packages.
Thank you very much for your response.
But I'm afraid I'm not clear what action I can take.
I don't like to remove any glibc or glibc-common packages,
as I'm afraid it might have a disastrous effect,
since they seem to be required by so many other packages,
including the kernel.
I'm slightly puzzled how the system got in this position,
as I have never said anything except yum upgrade,
and the repos I have enabled all seem harmless,
though there are several of them:
[adobe-linux-x86_64, CentOS-CR (cr), epel, kbs-CentOS-Extras, rpmforge.
The system (which is in another country) seems to be running fine.
If I leave it will it sort itself out in time?
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum problem with glibc
On 05/23/2012 04:41 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
---
Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 !=
glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.i686
** Found 3 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows:
bash-4.1.2-9.el6_2.x86_64 is a duplicate with
bash-4.1.2-8.el6.centos.x86_64 glibc-common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 is
a duplicate with glibc- common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.x86_64
glibc-common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 has missing requires of glibc =
('0', '2.12', '1.47.el6_2.12')
---
I've tried rpm --rebuilddb but that did not seem to help.
Any suggestions or advice gratefully received.
You have both the i686 and x86_64 versions of glibc installed. That
error means that the repo you are trying to update from has a different
version of i686 glibc and x86_64 glibc ... or you are trying to upgrade
one (the x86_64 version) and not the other (the i686 version).
Since multilib installs share some files (all the Documentation, etc.),
that means you must install the same version of each arch if you install
both i686 and x86_64 packages.
Thank you very much for your response.
But I'm afraid I'm not clear what action I can take.
I don't like to remove any glibc or glibc-common packages,
as I'm afraid it might have a disastrous effect,
since they seem to be required by so many other packages,
including the kernel.
I'm slightly puzzled how the system got in this position,
as I have never said anything except yum upgrade,
and the repos I have enabled all seem harmless,
though there are several of them:
[adobe-linux-x86_64, CentOS-CR (cr), epel, kbs-CentOS-Extras, rpmforge.
The system (which is in another country) seems to be running fine.
If I leave it will it sort itself out in time?
Based on your errors, what I would do is this:
1. You only need 1 version of glibc-common.x86_64. The only way you
could have gotten into this position is either your machine died in the
middle of a yum update or someone force installed the later glibc-common
via the rpm -i command.
I would first try to install the yum-utils package with this command:
yum install yum-utils
once that is installed, I would try:
yum-complete-transaction
If you do not have any incomplete transactions, then you have some bad
packages force installed.
I would figure out exactly what packages I had installed for glibc and
get them all on one version ... you need to be careful with glibc (and
its sub packages) ... it is the most important package on your machine.
How I would do this is that I would download all the RPMs for the latest
version of all the packages you have installed ... for me that would be:
glibc-devel-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64.rpm
glibc-headers-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64.rpm
glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.i686.rpm
glibc-common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64.rpm
glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64.rpm
nscd-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64.rpm
You may have others.
Once I had them all in the same directory, I would try a:
rpm -Uvh *.rpm
then I would look at the errors
based on those errors (if it does not install) then I would likely do:
rpm -Uvh --force *.rpm
that will LIKELY clean up your rpm issues for glibc ... but if you don't
understand the errors, post those here.
2. For bash, I would:
rpm -e bash-4.1.2-8.el6.centos.x86_64
then I would reinstall the other bash
yum reinstall bash-4.1.2-9.el6_2.x86_64
3. The real issue here is to make sure you figure out HOW you got in
this position and how NOT to get into it again.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SMB shares and LDAP
On May 22, 2012, at 11:07 AM, aurfalien aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: On May 21, 2012, at 11:25 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 05/21/2012 03:17 PM, aurfalien wrote: Is there some kind of passwd backend option in my smb.conf that allows it to query my OpenLDAP server? Presumably, you're trying to avoid a proper setup: http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Replicated_Failover_Domain_Controller_and_file_server_using_LDAP If you already have LDAP authentication and NSS set up, and you don't want to add Samba related attributes to your directory, you'd need to disable encrypt passwords in smb.conf and modify the Windows registry so that it sends your passwords in plain text: http://www.encs.concordia.ca/helpdesk/howto/plain_password.html Needless to say, the security of this configuration is awful, but not worse than if you're using OpenLDAP without SSL. Hi Gordon, What should my passdb backend be set to? Yes, you are correct, I'd rather dispense with having my ldap db be populated with Samba attributes. I've setup Samba + LDAP before, just unsure how to break the model. I mean the docs are great for doing things proper, just unsure how to do it improper if you know what I mean. Windows only authenticates CIFS with Kerberos, NTLM or plain text AFAIK. If security is a concern this means you'll need a Kerberos system or SAM account database setup. Kerberos is probably not an option at this point, which just leaves a SAM database of NTLM passwords. For this scenario the database comes in two varieties (backends), openldap or passdb. Openldap requires you to add the samba schema to your database and go through a period where it synchronizes the SAM passwords, basically implicitly trusting the client and recording the password sent to it if the password in the SAM DB is blank, if it isn't blank then authenticating the client. Passdb is pretty much the same except the SAM database is kept externally so no need to change your openldap schema. I do believe there is a way to use Samba+PAM to keep the passdb synchronized with the openldap by doing a samba password change whenever an openldap password change occurs, but it's pretty fragile. Personally I always prefer Kerberos, but it can be a bitch to setup after the fact (all those UPNs and SPNs plus nodes and applications = pain). Google search on site:samba.org -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 200 Stream not found errors in flash player and firefox
On 05/23/2012 11:38 PM, ken wrote: Rob, what are you doing to get the error message? I.e., what command or application are you invoking and where does the 200 Stream error appear? It appears in the middle of the flash player screen (black at this point as it is trying to load the stream) I've been having problems with flashplayer also-- for a long time and over many upgrades. When, using firefox, I visit a site which invokes flashplayer, the cpu load begins to increase it can go from 0.4 to 6.8. If I then close the tab to that site, the cpu load goes back down to where it was. I've talked with friends who use Mac OS X and Windows and they both experience similar problems with flashplayer, so I always assumed it was something in flash. Yes, flash player appears to have some nasty bits - maybe this is another reason why Apple / Steve Jobs was so anti flash on the iPhone. I am now using Konqueror with flowplayer - this is a java / flash incarnation that seems to work fine. On 05/21/2012 11:09 PM Rob Kampen wrote: Hi List, I have been getting the above errors for the last few months and extensive google foo has been less than conclusive - but indicates that the requesting flash player is somehow putting the wrong url content into the request. After I recently did a yum update on my wife's laptop she too started getting these errors. She has an old sony laptop running 5.8 and other than this error on various streaming tv links it is working just fine. Needless to say, she is less than thrilled with my IT skills at this point as she can no longer watch her favourite TV programs. So I decided to try and track down the problem on my own machine (CentOS 6.2) where yumex allows you to see and load older versions of a package. I started with a downgrade (and then a 2nd one and then the 5th one) of libflashplayer.so - fortunately rpmforge has older versions. Going right back to a 10.x version did not fix the problem. Thus I guess it is a firefox / xulrunner problem, however I am not happy to go back too many versions here as the exploit potential is much higher. Then I tried konqueror with flash enabled and guess what - no problems with any of the links that fail under firefox / libflashplayer. So my question to the list members - does anyone else have this problem with flash under firefox?? What do I do to fix it? TIA Rob ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Repositories in CentOS 5.8
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote: On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 01:11:54 PM Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote: 1.) EPEL doesn't make it a priority (or even a goal) to work well with any other third-party repository; True enough as a fact, but it sort-of sounds like a criticism for something that's not really practical. I'll just point to the EPEL section of the wiki.centos.org Repositories page, and let that say almost all that really needs to be said, other than I will say that I chose my wording for that sentence rather carefully, since I didn't want it to sound like a complaint, and only hit send after making multiple revisions. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Thanks for the explanation. Please help me understand when i install CentOS 5.8 on a fresh server, what are the available repositories by default and if i need any packages which are not there in the default repos, Do i need to enable third party repositories. Regards Kaushal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Centos 5.8 has no Virtualization install option
Hi, when I try to install Centos 5.8 on a Dell r410 then I don't get a Virtualization option during the package selection of the installer. Centos 5.7 does show that option fine. Is this a known issue? Regards, Dennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
