[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1184 CentOS 5 perl-XML-SAX FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1184
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1184.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
85aed94f1ee9a2c4886d2bbca6ccd73b59d9e9e0903f866c84e12219703faeca
perl-XML-SAX-0.14-13.el5.noarch.rpm
x86_64:
85aed94f1ee9a2c4886d2bbca6ccd73b59d9e9e0903f866c84e12219703faeca
perl-XML-SAX-0.14-13.el5.noarch.rpm
Source:
6f4b61fbe7b63de7d5c02060658ff4abb22311683498d23cd28a74be734d21c1
perl-XML-SAX-0.14-13.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1188 CentOS 6 cluster Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1188
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1188.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
0884f142ad72587353fe703782995289324bee58533e1ffd3894eb29bc9aec49
clusterlib-3.0.12.1-32.el6_3.1.i686.rpm
4bbd67e420ba3831a44c73352c9242e7069dcd5911bd6aa44ff4583018a6217b
clusterlib-devel-3.0.12.1-32.el6_3.1.i686.rpm
2772b2983618ad22bedab7882b23b1d15812e108e1e67fe3bb4e65c14045d383
cman-3.0.12.1-32.el6_3.1.i686.rpm
d894d4dbcd8d8affe9790b7c932d08b036e00b1b685497144539f609bee5cc74
gfs2-utils-3.0.12.1-32.el6_3.1.i686.rpm
x86_64:
0884f142ad72587353fe703782995289324bee58533e1ffd3894eb29bc9aec49
clusterlib-3.0.12.1-32.el6_3.1.i686.rpm
7bc8556a181a8d9384e896f2f6d2a9873c4c0fc527e10d604bc87cdb7e504f19
clusterlib-3.0.12.1-32.el6_3.1.x86_64.rpm
4bbd67e420ba3831a44c73352c9242e7069dcd5911bd6aa44ff4583018a6217b
clusterlib-devel-3.0.12.1-32.el6_3.1.i686.rpm
106cfdae34f1e8676c3a5ab8d38e75f512db2e76a4d354d67e5afb0e3e2878fa
clusterlib-devel-3.0.12.1-32.el6_3.1.x86_64.rpm
12c9f4beb799cc83befa4654810653c7af4ef5bf50dc86dd64c27f240d8f2235
cman-3.0.12.1-32.el6_3.1.x86_64.rpm
f2b3ac3f2de5883b927b3217ccf23d7f20563b663338c131f0da1d424880daa1
gfs2-utils-3.0.12.1-32.el6_3.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
7dd61eb2163bce86db970ce082765cc9c7e7b9e7e4ccce60a669f3ba657c3d74
cluster-3.0.12.1-32.el6_3.1.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:1174 Low CentOS 5 kernel Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1174 Low
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1174.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
007574b8b83e4f7a9115f5c88662987aa7cefa4ec8d643593093f6622368159d
kernel-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.i686.rpm
56d3750693a8e702ea5f2d228bfa90121d99ab684ee0e551cfec7ffd222aa86d
kernel-debug-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.i686.rpm
d9ea4496ce8e7a242548a63e5314a36d8be6ba568e4c2509d6be382760b01ede
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.i686.rpm
d9e78ac7660465cec5d4c0533a5a37690270eb0c048697d8717a066b24e96c7f
kernel-devel-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.i686.rpm
ed283ffd469117f3696f77c57e58dea6ac1c037dd2648b497fb1cd58298f97c4
kernel-doc-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.noarch.rpm
2554589055a1db9b4bc027bc58c22a2445438de6cf8eef5c1c6f430fc964f237
kernel-headers-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.i386.rpm
fb126c493e4d14cb4475a3c9214833893a03907fe15a98d45262aba89e877a43
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.i686.rpm
ddf76d4f4ba5b58654881dc9bdb1106e473c6a8f77d0428d57a199d2940566cb
kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.i686.rpm
7917773f962fa4be09e1285259f6205660727a55171cb2100ee8a951a278f98e
kernel-xen-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.i686.rpm
a23b0ea62ffb7f46ba1bcbf4f0f936588dfddbede13c5d684043155cff53cd3e
kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.i686.rpm
x86_64:
a98f8e0d679ccc7f436bedbf17a2ff4b928bd0ec81b34549989d8f29e972787b
kernel-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
786ae2d03b1722d02625d816cf056fdb6f5dd844c174b7d84ba63ee9f82b6ef2
kernel-debug-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
7fb96cc3983922b0d76d8aabe574d6a8327bdfd16fa7e249b1e3a90567335817
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
cc6f2f94ce5011eaa8d4ea1a671fae1c23c4051599eeab7604ffc0a34bd9ec63
kernel-devel-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
ed283ffd469117f3696f77c57e58dea6ac1c037dd2648b497fb1cd58298f97c4
kernel-doc-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.noarch.rpm
b319cf7cc1586832b97c4143311f4c782de12e1e03d106cd4959e047f1a51d8c
kernel-headers-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
5cfd019d08a7e516e959bd92d13180230a86deeb874c9d977ef64bd318e21bca
kernel-xen-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
dad1e5f000a37307c9469416dd3dbd1bacd5d8855655886fc2629537daf98782
kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
dd30cc06c412caf391e7e96e3d4ab01d80dcb50b4d81e752735c8587b93372fe
kernel-2.6.18-308.13.1.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS] Debugging/optimizing LAN/Fileserver Performance
Hi, I do have one fileserver, which is compared to other systems slow when transferring file through the lan. The test I did get a transfer speed of about 70 - 80 MB/s. I copy files by rsync or scp from a SSD disk to the servers ISCSI Storage and I tested to copy to a serverside RAM disk. I copy one big file of about 2/10 GB; 2 is to the RAM disk. The point is, the mentioned one server just get rates off 35+- MB :/ To DAS HW Raid and RAM disk. And I don't have any clue, why it is so slow All servers and clients are connected to gbit full duplex cisco switche ports, which are configured the same. The servers ar centos 6.3. Filesystems ext4 with default settings. I checked cables and logfiles but don't get any errors/warnings to. The difference is: The concerned server has a 'small' CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 3040 @ 1.86GHz Dual Core. My question: What can affect the network speed? What parameters can I check? Thanks for any suggestion or hints! Best Regards . Götz -- Götz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 Fax +49 7141 969 55 420 E-Mail goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jürgen Walter MdL Staatssekretär im Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Geschäftsführer: Prof. Thomas Schadt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Debugging/optimizing LAN/Fileserver Performance
On 08/21/2012 08:54 AM, Götz Reinicke wrote: The test I did get a transfer speed of about 70 - 80 MB/s. I copy files by rsync or scp from a SSD disk to the servers ISCSI Storage and I tested to copy to a serverside RAM disk. What does top say on the server when you're copying? Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Debugging/optimizing LAN/Fileserver Performance
Am 21.08.12 09:14, schrieb Mogens Kjaer: On 08/21/2012 08:54 AM, Götz Reinicke wrote: The test I did get a transfer speed of about 70 - 80 MB/s. I copy files by rsync or scp from a SSD disk to the servers ISCSI Storage and I tested to copy to a serverside RAM disk. What does top say on the server when you're copying? load average: 0.75, 0.23, 0.07 Cpu(s): 56.8%us, 12.1%sy, 0.0%ni, 19.0%id, 8.6%wa, 0.3%hi, 3.1%si, 0.0%st 564 root 20 0 98.5m 6872 2968 R 99.0 0.2 1:08.10 sshd 569 root 20 0 105m 860 360 R 35.2 0.0 0:22.33 rsync /Götz -- Götz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 Fax +49 7141 969 55 420 E-Mail goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jürgen Walter MdL Staatssekretär im Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Geschäftsführer: Prof. Thomas Schadt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Debugging/optimizing LAN/Fileserver Performance
On 08/21/2012 09:30 AM, Götz Reinicke wrote: 564 root 20 0 98.5m 6872 2968 R 99.0 0.2 1:08.10 sshd It looks like ssh is the rate limiting step in your rsync. What cipher are you using for ssh? I use rsync --rsh='/usr/bin/ssh -c arcfour128' ... that helps quite a bit on my hardware, your hardware might do better with another cipher. You should check out https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=136713 to learn more about this. Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Debugging/optimizing LAN/Fileserver Performance
Am 21.08.12 09:37, schrieb Mogens Kjaer: On 08/21/2012 09:30 AM, Götz Reinicke wrote: 564 root 20 0 98.5m 6872 2968 R 99.0 0.2 1:08.10 sshd It looks like ssh is the rate limiting step in your rsync. What cipher are you using for ssh? I use rsync --rsh='/usr/bin/ssh -c arcfour128' ... that helps quite a bit on my hardware, your hardware might do better with another cipher. You should check out https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=136713 to learn more about this. Thanks, that shows a much different transfer speed :) I was not thinking, that rsync also involves ssh and de/encryption speed .. so the bottleneck looks like the cpu in my test. Thanks a lot I learned something new to me :) Regards . Götz -- Götz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 Fax +49 7141 969 55 420 E-Mail goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jürgen Walter MdL Staatssekretär im Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Geschäftsführer: Prof. Thomas Schadt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] proftp drives me crazy ....
Hi, I installed proftpd from Centos repository to my Centos 6.3 server. Iptables and selinux are off; I do have one unix user which can ssh and login to the server. I do use the default config and cant login to the ftp server (home directory of that user is all I want) :/ I use filezilla and Mac OS X native ftp access, both fails with incorrect login (530) WTF can be wrong? Or what may I have to change? Thanks for any hints and suggestions! Regards . Götz -- Götz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 Fax +49 7141 969 55 420 E-Mail goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jürgen Walter MdL Staatssekretär im Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Geschäftsführer: Prof. Thomas Schadt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] proftp drives me crazy ....
The shell of the approp user not defined in /etc/shells? The user in /etc/ftpusers to deny access? The ftp server not started? ... suomi On 2012-08-21 11:29, Götz Reinicke wrote: Hi, I installed proftpd from Centos repository to my Centos 6.3 server. Iptables and selinux are off; I do have one unix user which can ssh and login to the server. I do use the default config and cant login to the ftp server (home directory of that user is all I want) :/ I use filezilla and Mac OS X native ftp access, both fails with incorrect login (530) WTF can be wrong? Or what may I have to change? Thanks for any hints and suggestions! Regards . Götz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] proftp drives me crazy ....
Hi, On 08/21/2012 10:29 AM, Götz Reinicke wrote: I installed proftpd from Centos repository to my Centos 6.3 server. CentOS does not ship proftpd - so you might want to check where you got it from. can be wrong? Or what may I have to change? look at the log files on the server to see what is reported, then read the config files to make sure there is authentication setup. Or even better, get rid of proftpd and just install vsftpd which should work out of the box on a CentOS machine ( and its included in the CentOS repos ) Also, have you considered trimming your signature a bit ? at 23 lines its a bit over the usual 4 lines that most people stick with on mailing lists. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] proftp drives me crazy ....
Am 21.08.12 11:39, schrieb anax: The shell of the approp user not defined in /etc/shells? It is, login by ssh uses that shell. The user in /etc/ftpusers to deny access? nop The ftp server not started? it is started ... suomi On 2012-08-21 11:29, Götz Reinicke wrote: Hi, I installed proftpd from Centos repository to my Centos 6.3 server. Iptables and selinux are off; I do have one unix user which can ssh and login to the server. I do use the default config and cant login to the ftp server (home directory of that user is all I want) :/ I use filezilla and Mac OS X native ftp access, both fails with incorrect login (530) WTF can be wrong? Or what may I have to change? Thanks for any hints and suggestions! Regards . Götz -- Götz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 Fax +49 7141 969 55 420 E-Mail goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jürgen Walter MdL Staatssekretär im Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Geschäftsführer: Prof. Thomas Schadt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] proftp drives me crazy ....
Am 21.08.12 11:41, schrieb Karanbir Singh: Hi, On 08/21/2012 10:29 AM, Götz Reinicke wrote: I installed proftpd from Centos repository to my Centos 6.3 server. CentOS does not ship proftpd - so you might want to check where you got it from. /(§ repositories; it's from rpmforge. Sorry. can be wrong? Or what may I have to change? look at the log files on the server to see what is reported, then read the config files to make sure there is authentication setup. Or even better, get rid of proftpd and just install vsftpd which should work out of the box on a CentOS machine ( and its included in the CentOS repos ) I'll try vsftpd. Also, have you considered trimming your signature a bit ? at 23 lines its a bit over the usual 4 lines that most people stick with on mailing lists. Sorry for that much mail signature, but that's our company policy and have to use it that way... Thanks Regards . Götz -- Götz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 Fax +49 7141 969 55 420 E-Mail goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jürgen Walter MdL Staatssekretär im Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Geschäftsführer: Prof. Thomas Schadt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] proftp drives me crazy ....
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:46:45AM +0200, Götz Reinicke wrote: Sorry for that much mail signature, but that's our company policy and have to use it that way... Post from another mail account, then? Signatures that long are rude to those of us that don't really care about your corporate policies. -- When a man tells you that he got rich through hard work, ask him: Whose? -- Don Marquis (1878-1937), American humorist, journalist, and author pgpjoY7oIZ0S5.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] projects.centos.org - certificate has expired
Just FYI I guess, you could also run your own CA and sign stuff yourself. After all, your RPMs are also self-signed ;-) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] KVM Setup for Win7 Pro on CentOS 5.x
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: On 08/16/2012 12:34 AM, Bill Campbell wrote: Can somebody point me to a HowTO or other documentation describing the tools available under the CentOS 5 KVM package to create and manage a Windows 7 Pro VM? All my VM experience to date has been the old free VMware Server. Just for information, there is a centos-virt ML. Thanks for that hint. I subscribed a couple of days ago, but so far haven't seen any traffic. A google search of the archives did turn up some interesting posts. I have things working now after cleaning up some of the cruft left around after my original attempts to follow the docs. standard input:17: warning [p 1, 1.7i]: can't break line 1. Create a bridge, 'br0' following the writeup on this page (and several others): https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html-single/Virtualization/index.html#sect-Virtualization-Network_Configuration-Bridged_networking_with_libvirt This link also has some interesting hints. http://itscblog.tamu.edu/startup-guide-for-kvm-on-centos-6/ 2. Delete the routed network definition I had made prior to creating the bridge. Things didn't work properly with the old definition even though it was point to my private interface, 'eth1'. I also deleted the 'default' NAT interface as we will never use that. 3. Check for other software that references the new bridge, changing the old 'eth1' interface to 'br0'. Samba shares were not appearing until I updated 'interfaces' in the 'smb.conf' file. This may have been caused when I turned sharing on in the Win7 VM which I didn't need. Bill -- INTERNET: b...@celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way Voice: (206) 236-1676 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820 Fax:(206) 232-9186 Skype: jwccsllc (206) 855-5792 If there's anything a public servant hates to do it's something for the public. -- K. Hubbard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] OpenVPN TAP interface problem.
Hi all. I have an OpenVPN server: 2.2.1-1 x86_64 Server config: port 11223 dev tap proto udp tls-server ca keys/ca.crt cert keys/server.crt key keys/server.key dh keys/dh1024.pem server 1.2.3.3 255.255.255.0 push route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 1.2.3.4 keepalive 10 60 client-to-client duplicate-cn inactive 600 log /var/log/openvpn.log syslog status /var/log/openvpn-status.log user openvpn group openvpn persist-tun persist-key verb 4 comp-lzo Server interface: 11: tap0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 100 link/ether 56:73:e7:c9:c8:e5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 1.2.3.4/24 brd 1.2.3.255 scope global tap0 Client: 2.2.1-8ubuntu1 x86_64 Client config: remote 1.2.3.3 port 11223 dev tap proto udp resolv-retry infinite #nobind persist-key persist-tun tls-client ca /etc/openvpn/keys/ca.crt cert /etc/openvpn/keys/client.crt key /etc/openvpn/keys/client.key ns-cert-type server comp-lzo verb 4 log /var/log/openvpn.log #syslog status /var/log/openvpn-status.log After successful start of openvpn service (Tue Aug 21 16:12:24 2012 us=644993 Initialization Sequence Completed in logfile) I have: Client interface: 9: tap0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 100 link/ether 4a:3d:52:dc:51:c3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff When I start the tunnel I am not able to ping 1.2.3.4 IP on server, the TAP interface is also in DOWN state. I have no firewall configured. My client log file is attached. Should I have an IP addres on my TAP interface? Thanks for the help ;) Best regards, Rafal. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OpenVPN TAP interface problem.
Rafał Radecki wrote: Hi all. I have an OpenVPN server: 2.2.1-1 x86_64 snip After successful start of openvpn service (Tue Aug 21 16:12:24 2012 us=644993 Initialization Sequence Completed in logfile) I have: Client interface: 9: tap0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 100 link/ether 4a:3d:52:dc:51:c3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff When I start the tunnel I am not able to ping 1.2.3.4 IP on server, the TAP interface is also in DOWN state. I have no firewall configured. My client log file is attached. Should I have an IP addres on my TAP interface? I know nothing at all about OpenVPN, but the first thing I'd look at is why it's in a DOWN state. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] projects.centos.org - certificate has expired
From: Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de Just FYI I guess, you could also run your own CA and sign stuff yourself. After all, your RPMs are also self-signed ;-) But that means the browsers will complain until each user permanently adds this untrusted certificate manually... which might be no big deal if only a few ttech savy people are using this sub-domain... If CentOS is rich, a wildcard certificate costs around $120/year, maybe cheaper... JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OpenVPN TAP interface problem.
Am 21.08.2012 um 16:27 schrieb Rafał Radecki: When I start the tunnel I am not able to ping 1.2.3.4 IP on server, the TAP interface is also in DOWN state. I have no firewall configured. My client log file is attached. Should I have an IP addres on my TAP interface? What are your goals? A bridged setup (dev tap) or a routed network (dev tun)? LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] projects.centos.org - certificate has expired
On 8/21/2012 7:39 AM, John Doe wrote: From: Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de Just FYI I guess, you could also run your own CA and sign stuff yourself. After all, your RPMs are also self-signed ;-) But that means the browsers will complain until each user permanently adds this untrusted certificate manually... which might be no big deal if only a few ttech savy people are using this sub-domain... If CentOS is rich, a wildcard certificate costs around $120/year, maybe cheaper... Or $0/year at startssl.com... -Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] projects.centos.org - certificate has expired
Startssl Wildcards require validation which is (i think) $59,90 per 2 years. Now startssl simple certificates are $0, that's right :-) Since i am StartCom-validated anyway i'd donate a 2-year SSL wildcard certificate if the person in charge contacts me off-list. All i need i s a CSR to submit and a valid email contact for the centos.org domain... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] Im Auftrag von Greg Bailey Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. August 2012 16:48 An: centos@centos.org Betreff: Re: [CentOS] projects.centos.org - certificate has expired On 8/21/2012 7:39 AM, John Doe wrote: From: Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de Just FYI I guess, you could also run your own CA and sign stuff yourself. After all, your RPMs are also self-signed ;-) But that means the browsers will complain until each user permanently adds this untrusted certificate manually... which might be no big deal if only a few ttech savy people are using this sub-domain... If CentOS is rich, a wildcard certificate costs around $120/year, maybe cheaper... Or $0/year at startssl.com... -Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] projects.centos.org - certificate has expired
On 21/08/2012 15:47, Greg Bailey wrote: On 8/21/2012 7:39 AM, John Doe wrote: From: Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de Just FYI I guess, you could also run your own CA and sign stuff yourself. After all, your RPMs are also self-signed ;-) But that means the browsers will complain until each user permanently adds this untrusted certificate manually... which might be no big deal if only a few ttech savy people are using this sub-domain... If CentOS is rich, a wildcard certificate costs around $120/year, maybe cheaper... Or $0/year at startssl.com... -Greg I use startssl.com - and generally it is fine... I have however had a problem. Someone recently sent an email in my name (but not from my email address) asking for my certificate to be revoked to the startssl certmaster. The startssl certmaster went ahead and revoked my certificate, this caused me a fair amount of pain, and obviously there is little cross-verification done against this type of social-engineering attack. I have been told that it is unlikely to happen again (because my account now has red flags all over it), but if you use certificates for anything serious you might want to use an organisation that has enough funding to perform some cross-verification against such attacks.. -- Regards, Giles Coochey, CCNA, CCNAS NetSecSpec Ltd +44 (0) 7983 877438 http://www.coochey.net http://www.netsecspec.co.uk gi...@coochey.net ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] projects.centos.org - certificate has expired
From: Greg Bailey gbai...@lxpro.com On 8/21/2012 7:39 AM, John Doe wrote: From: Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de Just FYI I guess, you could also run your own CA and sign stuff yourself. After all, your RPMs are also self-signed ;-) But that means the browsers will complain until each user permanently adds this untrusted certificate manually... which might be no big deal if only a few ttech savy people are using this sub-domain... If CentOS is rich, a wildcard certificate costs around $120/year, maybe cheaper... Or $0/year at startssl.com... In the Class 1 settings (free), the only possible relationship between StartCom and the subscriber is with individuals Now, is CentOS more of an individual than a company...? JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] projects.centos.org - certificate has expired
John Doe wrote: From: Greg Bailey gbai...@lxpro.com On 8/21/2012 7:39 AM, John Doe wrote: From: Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de Just FYI I guess, you could also run your own CA and sign stuff yourself. After all, your RPMs are also self-signed ;-) But that means the browsers will complain until each user permanently adds this untrusted certificate manually... which might be no big deal if only a few ttech savy people are using this sub-domain... If CentOS is rich, a wildcard certificate costs around $120/year, maybe cheaper... Or $0/year at startssl.com... In the Class 1 settings (free), the only possible relationship between StartCom and the subscriber is with individuals Now, is CentOS more of an individual than a company...? Silly question: would they *donate* one? Or check out root CA's that use CentOS, and ask? (Sorry, I can't remember whether Trustwave, who I did a short-term contract for in '09, used RHEL or CentOS). mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] projects.centos.org - certificate has expired
On 08/21/2012 02:37 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote: Just FYI I guess, you could also run your own CA and sign stuff yourself. After all, your RPMs are also self-signed ;-) I'll get this fixed shortly. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 90, Issue 12
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CEBA-2012:1175 CentOS 6 lldpad Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CESA-2012:1180 Moderate CentOS 6 gimp Update (Johnny Hughes)
3. CEBA-2012:1182 CentOS 6 dropwatch FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:23:38 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1175 CentOS 6 lldpad Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20120820162338.ga3...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1175
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1175.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
44c0d1a80e6afcf5ce1815c5594e22e69b64d71995ecb0580c18f95086b14001
lldpad-0.9.43-20.el6_3.i686.rpm
d89a96d9870538240259713e4604edf2fe01f290d09d313bc97e4e7a83a2b973
lldpad-devel-0.9.43-20.el6_3.i686.rpm
x86_64:
b8d1fe24aedc0bd2257751100e4e31da63a0e83b8b8f6f1bf2750f82d9704701
lldpad-0.9.43-20.el6_3.x86_64.rpm
d89a96d9870538240259713e4604edf2fe01f290d09d313bc97e4e7a83a2b973
lldpad-devel-0.9.43-20.el6_3.i686.rpm
b60d621b8669a0e4ed5811a743f2bf1fc0bc218e2a8e728a472d77782b33ed5b
lldpad-devel-0.9.43-20.el6_3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
7813cc04c6726c7860fcf31a049bf2c4cabfbcd5e297bd9891a4f7ae4eb9da04
lldpad-0.9.43-20.el6_3.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:23:59 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:1180 Moderate CentOS 6 gimp
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20120820162359.ga3...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1180 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1180.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
bf77c78603120e7763f561e53f9d0f05a4a43cf4f9ae5ca310aa47bd1cea3875
gimp-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
afdfc47cea6baf3f805915c88377f01fd158cfc95f3384fb3ff6910b92dbfeb6
gimp-devel-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
bae1bc702fccecd530ca5ce023fd27b8faebfe8502c1db8754098033d214c5de
gimp-devel-tools-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
50a7d1a29b521fb183db906330a30db193d1b253e61c7eb5651b4c9cd1fdb2d4
gimp-help-browser-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
7c49f7125b1d6921c72fcbd5e39b82cc738868728ea6ad69bf627d8224cb46a7
gimp-libs-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
x86_64:
700bff613b9c5ec262ccf2f1fa307e9c0250c73fbc712582962f7939ef811cbe
gimp-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm
afdfc47cea6baf3f805915c88377f01fd158cfc95f3384fb3ff6910b92dbfeb6
gimp-devel-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
afbfdc0c694c04ded8e7631aedb90732b82fc572ef08cd91d59e51601e2d31c3
gimp-devel-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm
7e9d7bbedf7af8738f87ef7d8973c855b4a4cfdade3e0319053225ac4000c6d4
gimp-devel-tools-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm
91f6461858e878872dadee1c95e568fcac38e5ab556efe3b1aed91569b383fd6
gimp-help-browser-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm
7c49f7125b1d6921c72fcbd5e39b82cc738868728ea6ad69bf627d8224cb46a7
gimp-libs-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
ab390738da10d9ddd6e6688498c595903a4a5cb393e06ec916686627c33d
gimp-libs-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
a4642047bd08241fc1fa97418861fe733761ec0babef53aaef3241227590838c
gimp-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 22:30:39 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1182 CentOS 6 dropwatch FASTTRACK
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20120820223039.ga22...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1182
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1182.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
6ac23fb8e771b955101114e18fca69ec8a6d20e92241fddd86f9b6633931ac5d
dropwatch-1.3-1.el6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
25c46207c9b627dbd1e3b7e4d2ff7d607007b077161ab400843cb7c40ae95230
dropwatch-1.3-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
2bc4942b0f96336c8d3d5f25a7392f6e347ab5e852a14b786640da31f30f562f
Re: [CentOS] Intel D425KT Motherboard / Realtek RTL8105E
Just to be sure, have you tested on the machine to ping the interface? i.e. give it an IP address in ifcfg-eth0, then ping the ip address locally? Did you put another temporary PCI card into the system and tried that? Jobst On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:59:11PM -0500, Tim Nelson (tnel...@rockbochs.com) wrote: - Original Message - Tim Nelson wrote: Greetings- I'm attempting to get CentOS 5.5 x86 (yes, very specific version required for specific software usage scenario... don't ask) running on an Intel D425KT mini-ITX motherboard. Everything works fine, with the exception of the onboard ethernet, which is a Realtek RTL8105E chip. The stock CentOS installation attempts to use the r8169 driver, which does not work. I've been around the block a few times dealing with Realtek interfaces and their driver hell, but this one is stumping me. snip I've got a baaad feeling about this. Have you considered returning the m/b for a replacement? Yes, it crossed my mind, but the fact is I have 4 of these boards, all with the same symptoms. :( --Tim ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular? | |0| | Jobst Schmalenbach, jo...@barrett.com.au, General Manager | | |0| Barrett Consulting Group P/L The Meditation Room P/L |0|0|0| +61 3 9532 7677, POBox 277, Caulfield South, 3162, Australia ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
