[CentOS-virt] Traffic Accounting KVM vs Xen
We've been using CentOS 6.4 for both host and KVM guests for our own internal uses here, ftp server, mail servers, web server, etc. I am getting to where we want to offer virtual servers for lease but to do so we need some method of measuring and/or limiting traffic to individual guests. I am wondering what others are using for this purpose? I know that you can look at traffic stats on the bridge on the host machine but that information is lost when the machine is rebooted. I'm wondering if there is any software that databases that information on an ongoing basis and does not lost information across reboots? Second question, what are the advantaged and disadvantages of KVM verses Xen? I played with Xen back when I had CentOS 5, but find KVM easier to work with and not much difference in performance. -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting. Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers. See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874. ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] Traffic Accounting KVM vs Xen
On 2013-08-16 02:24, Robert Dinse wrote: I am getting to where we want to offer virtual servers for lease but to do so we need some method of measuring and/or limiting traffic to individual guests. I am wondering what others are using for this purpose? I know that you can look at traffic stats on the bridge on the host machine but that information is lost when the machine is rebooted. I'm wondering if there is any software that databases that information on an ongoing basis and does not lost information across reboots? What would be your policies when reaching the quota? Depending on that, you could take some solution or another. In a previous work, we used AAA with Coova and FreeRADIUS, but you can also just use iptables. -- RMA. ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-es] email
Buenos Dias una pregunta como hago para que puedan enviar email desde un telefono de nextel ya configure el telefono y se le llegan los email pero cuando quiero enviar uno no salen , mi servidor lo tengo configurado para que las ip que esten en el archivo access tengan acceso a poder enviar , pero no se que ip o como poner a nextel para que puedan enviar mis usuarios gracias ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] email
On 08/15/2013 11:32 AM, VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ wrote: Buenos Dias una pregunta como hago para que puedan enviar email desde un telefono de nextel ya configure el telefono y se le llegan los email pero cuando quiero enviar uno no salen , mi servidor lo tengo configurado para que las ip que esten en el archivo access tengan acceso a poder enviar , pero no se que ip o como poner a nextel para que puedan enviar mis usuarios implementa saslauth -- Ernesto Pérez Estévez Movi: 09 9924 6504 http://EcuaLinux.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] AYUDA CON PROXY CENTOS Y FIREWALL SHOREWALL
BUENAS PARA SOLICITARLE SU AYUDA A TODA LA COMUNIDAD HE INSTALADO UN SERVIDOR PROXY CON FIREWALL SHOREWALL TODO BIEN PERO CUANDO QUIERO ENVIAR Y RECIBIR CORREO DE MICROSOFT OUTLOOK 2007 NO CONECTA ME SALE ERROR DE CONEXIÓNSI PODRÍAN AYUDARME GRACIAS ROLANDO JESÚS NUÑEZ TARAZONAPERU Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:11:09 -0500 From: cen...@ecualinux.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] email On 08/15/2013 11:32 AM, VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ wrote: Buenos Dias una pregunta como hago para que puedan enviar email desde un telefono de nextel ya configure el telefono y se le llegan los email pero cuando quiero enviar uno no salen , mi servidor lo tengo configurado para que las ip que esten en el archivo access tengan acceso a poder enviar , pero no se que ip o como poner a nextel para que puedan enviar mis usuarios implementa saslauth -- Ernesto Pérez Estévez Movi: 09 9924 6504 http://EcuaLinux.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] AYUDA CON PROXY CENTOS Y FIREWALL SHOREWALL
Verifica en tu firewall las reglas de salida y entrada de la lan para los puertos SMTP IMAP POP3. From: rolandojesu...@hotmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:25:38 -0500 Subject: [CentOS-es] AYUDA CON PROXY CENTOS Y FIREWALL SHOREWALL BUENAS PARA SOLICITARLE SU AYUDA A TODA LA COMUNIDAD HE INSTALADO UN SERVIDOR PROXY CON FIREWALL SHOREWALL TODO BIEN PERO CUANDO QUIERO ENVIAR Y RECIBIR CORREO DE MICROSOFT OUTLOOK 2007 NO CONECTA ME SALE ERROR DE CONEXIÓNSI PODRÍAN AYUDARME GRACIAS ROLANDO JESÚS NUÑEZ TARAZONAPERU Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:11:09 -0500 From: cen...@ecualinux.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] email On 08/15/2013 11:32 AM, VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ wrote: Buenos Dias una pregunta como hago para que puedan enviar email desde un telefono de nextel ya configure el telefono y se le llegan los email pero cuando quiero enviar uno no salen , mi servidor lo tengo configurado para que las ip que esten en el archivo access tengan acceso a poder enviar , pero no se que ip o como poner a nextel para que puedan enviar mis usuarios implementa saslauth -- Ernesto Pérez Estévez Movi: 09 9924 6504 http://EcuaLinux.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] AYUDA CON PROXY CENTOS Y FIREWALL SHOREWALL
Ip_forwarding = 1 Jesús Rudas Simmonds Móvil 57-3157482877 Enviado desde mi iPhone El 15/08/2013, a las 12:40 p.m., Luis Terrel cantrel...@hotmail.com escribió: Verifica en tu firewall las reglas de salida y entrada de la lan para los puertos SMTP IMAP POP3. From: rolandojesu...@hotmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:25:38 -0500 Subject: [CentOS-es] AYUDA CON PROXY CENTOS Y FIREWALL SHOREWALL BUENAS PARA SOLICITARLE SU AYUDA A TODA LA COMUNIDAD HE INSTALADO UN SERVIDOR PROXY CON FIREWALL SHOREWALL TODO BIEN PERO CUANDO QUIERO ENVIAR Y RECIBIR CORREO DE MICROSOFT OUTLOOK 2007 NO CONECTA ME SALE ERROR DE CONEXIÓNSI PODRÍAN AYUDARME GRACIAS ROLANDO JESÚS NUÑEZ TARAZONAPERU Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:11:09 -0500 From: cen...@ecualinux.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] email On 08/15/2013 11:32 AM, VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ wrote: Buenos Dias una pregunta como hago para que puedan enviar email desde un telefono de nextel ya configure el telefono y se le llegan los email pero cuando quiero enviar uno no salen , mi servidor lo tengo configurado para que las ip que esten en el archivo access tengan acceso a poder enviar , pero no se que ip o como poner a nextel para que puedan enviar mis usuarios implementa saslauth -- Ernesto Pérez Estévez Movi: 09 9924 6504 http://EcuaLinux.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] AYUDA CON PROXY CENTOS Y FIREWALL SHOREWALL
BUENAS AHI LE ENVIO EL ARCHIVO DEL SHOREWALL SI PORQUE TODO ESTA BIEN SOLO NO SALE EL OUTLOOK. BACH. ING. ROLANDO JESÚS NUÑEZ TARAZONAPROGRAMA NACIONAL DE ALIMENTACIÓN ESCOLAR - QALI WARMA UNIDAD DE ADMINISTRACIÓN PROFESIONAL ADMINISTRATIVO – SOPORTE SIAF- SP ESPECIALISTA SIAF - SIGA From: jrud...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:50:16 -0500 To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] AYUDA CON PROXY CENTOS Y FIREWALL SHOREWALL Ip_forwarding = 1 Jesús Rudas Simmonds Móvil 57-3157482877 Enviado desde mi iPhone El 15/08/2013, a las 12:40 p.m., Luis Terrel cantrel...@hotmail.com escribió: Verifica en tu firewall las reglas de salida y entrada de la lan para los puertos SMTP IMAP POP3. From: rolandojesu...@hotmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:25:38 -0500 Subject: [CentOS-es] AYUDA CON PROXY CENTOS Y FIREWALL SHOREWALL BUENAS PARA SOLICITARLE SU AYUDA A TODA LA COMUNIDAD HE INSTALADO UN SERVIDOR PROXY CON FIREWALL SHOREWALL TODO BIEN PERO CUANDO QUIERO ENVIAR Y RECIBIR CORREO DE MICROSOFT OUTLOOK 2007 NO CONECTA ME SALE ERROR DE CONEXIÓNSI PODRÍAN AYUDARME GRACIAS ROLANDO JESÚS NUÑEZ TARAZONAPERU Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:11:09 -0500 From: cen...@ecualinux.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] email On 08/15/2013 11:32 AM, VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ wrote: Buenos Dias una pregunta como hago para que puedan enviar email desde un telefono de nextel ya configure el telefono y se le llegan los email pero cuando quiero enviar uno no salen , mi servidor lo tengo configurado para que las ip que esten en el archivo access tengan acceso a poder enviar , pero no se que ip o como poner a nextel para que puedan enviar mis usuarios implementa saslauth -- Ernesto Pérez Estévez Movi: 09 9924 6504 http://EcuaLinux.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] manejar espacios en blanco en el nombre de usuario
Gracias David, me han servido de mucho tus consejos!! JOSE FERMIN De: David González Romero dgrved...@gmail.com Para: centos-es@centos.org; Fermin Francisco abc...@yahoo.com Enviado: Miércoles, 14 de agosto, 2013 8:30 A.M. Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] manejar espacios en blanco en el nombre de usuario Hijole... la solucion la tiene Winrus Creas el usuario fermin.perez pero lo muestras como Fermin Perez. En tu samba fermin.perez; al final el usuario ve fermin perez, usa la interface de los iconitos de windows para el perfil local, así solo da click sobre el nombre y luego el passwd. Suerte, David El 12 de agosto de 2013 21:01, Fermin Francisco abc...@yahoo.com escribió: Buenas noches!! He instalado Centos 6.4 lo he configurado para que sea con controlado de dominio del Active Directory con Samba 4. Todo va a la perfeccion hasta que decide intentar crear un un usuario en el Active Directory llamado: fermin francisco. Resulta que cuando intento loguearme con M$ Windows 7 me dice lo siguiente: the user name or password En realidad el usuario es el correcto y la contrasena tambien es la correcta. Entonces decidi hacer una prueba, la cual fue que sustitui el espacio en blanco del usuario lo renombre de la siguiente manera: fermin-francisco. Despues de este cambio fue todo perfecto, me pude loguear con ese usuario. Pero lo que me gustaria es poder crear usuarios que contengan espacios en blanco entre su nombre y apellido: ejemplo juan perez, ya que esa forma es la manera natural de una persona escribir su nombre completo y no juan_perez. Alguien ha podido solucionar esa situacion?? JOSE FERMIN ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] AYUDA CON PROXY CENTOS Y FIREWALL SHOREWALL
creo que olvidaste adjuntar el archivo... Pero de forma generica te recomiendo hagas algunas reviciones a tus reglas: 1- Manten abiertos los puertos: 25 (smtp), 110 (pop), 143(imap) y busca el valor del puerto para esos mismo servicios pero en calidad de seguro (smtps, pops, imaps). 2- Activar el ip_forwarding en: *shell# echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward* * * 3- Activar tu firewall y verfica tu LOG. Haz prueba y checa el logo. Saludos ! El 15 de agosto de 2013 14:02, Rolando Jesus Nuñez Tarazona rolandojesu...@hotmail.com escribió: BUENAS AHI LE ENVIO EL ARCHIVO DEL SHOREWALL SI PORQUE TODO ESTA BIEN SOLO NO SALE EL OUTLOOK. BACH. ING. ROLANDO JESÚS NUÑEZ TARAZONAPROGRAMA NACIONAL DE ALIMENTACIÓN ESCOLAR - QALI WARMA UNIDAD DE ADMINISTRACIÓN PROFESIONAL ADMINISTRATIVO – SOPORTE SIAF- SP ESPECIALISTA SIAF - SIGA From: jrud...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:50:16 -0500 To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] AYUDA CON PROXY CENTOS Y FIREWALL SHOREWALL Ip_forwarding = 1 Jesús Rudas Simmonds Móvil 57-3157482877 Enviado desde mi iPhone El 15/08/2013, a las 12:40 p.m., Luis Terrel cantrel...@hotmail.com escribió: Verifica en tu firewall las reglas de salida y entrada de la lan para los puertos SMTP IMAP POP3. From: rolandojesu...@hotmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:25:38 -0500 Subject: [CentOS-es] AYUDA CON PROXY CENTOS Y FIREWALL SHOREWALL BUENAS PARA SOLICITARLE SU AYUDA A TODA LA COMUNIDAD HE INSTALADO UN SERVIDOR PROXY CON FIREWALL SHOREWALL TODO BIEN PERO CUANDO QUIERO ENVIAR Y RECIBIR CORREO DE MICROSOFT OUTLOOK 2007 NO CONECTA ME SALE ERROR DE CONEXIÓNSI PODRÍAN AYUDARME GRACIAS ROLANDO JESÚS NUÑEZ TARAZONAPERU Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:11:09 -0500 From: cen...@ecualinux.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] email On 08/15/2013 11:32 AM, VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ wrote: Buenos Dias una pregunta como hago para que puedan enviar email desde un telefono de nextel ya configure el telefono y se le llegan los email pero cuando quiero enviar uno no salen , mi servidor lo tengo configurado para que las ip que esten en el archivo access tengan acceso a poder enviar , pero no se que ip o como poner a nextel para que puedan enviar mis usuarios implementa saslauth -- Ernesto Pérez Estévez Movi: 09 9924 6504 http://EcuaLinux.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- M.S.I. Angel Haniel Cantu Jauregui. Celular: (011-52-1)-899-871-17-22 E-Mail: angel.ca...@sie-group.net Web: http://www.sie-group.net/ Cd. Reynosa Tamaulipas. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Modificar permisos carpeta compartida de samba en Win7
Buenas noches!! Tengo una carpeta compartida con Centos mediante samba4, y quiero a esta carpeta cambiarle algunos permisos desde Win7 haciendo lo siguiente: Clic derecho sobre la carpeta compartida y luego haciendo clic en propiedades. Cuando hago clic en la pestaña seguridad me aparece lo siguiente: the requested security information is either unavailable or cannot be displayed Alguno de ustedes habrá resuelto esta situación?? JOSE FERMIN ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] yum-plugin-priorities
If I add priority=1 to [updates] in CentOS-Base.repo when I run sudo yum update I get the warning 66 packages excluded due to repository priority protections This does not seem to have any adverse effect, but what exactly does it mean? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum-plugin-priorities
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@alice.it wrote: If I add priority=1 to [updates] in CentOS-Base.repo when I run sudo yum update I get the warning 66 packages excluded due to repository priority protections This does not seem to have any adverse effect, but what exactly does it mean? Hi Timothy, See http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities ( take a close look at section 5 ) Generally all active repo's in Base would be given the same priority. If you have only added a setting of 1 for updates then all other repos will have a priority of 99 (lower). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum-plugin-priorities
Clint Dilks wrote: If I add priority=1 to [updates] in CentOS-Base.repo when I run sudo yum update I get the warning 66 packages excluded due to repository priority protections This does not seem to have any adverse effect, but what exactly does it mean? See http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities ( take a close look at section 5 ) Thanks for your response. I had actually read this section, but evidently do not understand it. I take it the 66 packages mentioned are in unofficial repositories, in my case rpmforge.repo.rpmnew ? Generally all active repo's in Base would be given the same priority. If you have only added a setting of 1 for updates then all other repos will have a priority of 99 (lower). I did realize that. But as far as I can see, the effect of the plugin is to disable all repositories with priority 99, or indeed with priority 2 ? I've presently disabled this plugin, since I don't see any rational way of using it. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum-plugin-priorities
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote: Clint Dilks wrote: If I add priority=1 to [updates] in CentOS-Base.repo when I run sudo yum update I get the warning 66 packages excluded due to repository priority protections See http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities ( take a close look at section 5 ) Thanks for your response. I had actually read this section, but evidently do not understand it. I take it the 66 packages mentioned are in unofficial repositories, in my case rpmforge.repo.rpmnew ? If you have a repo called something.repo.rpmnew, it will be ignored. You would have to rename it to something.repo. To oversimplify, say that you have rpmforge, base, and epel repos. Say that all of them have versions of perl. However, these versions may conflict with each other and break things. So, if you gave base and updates priority of 1, then the others, even if they have a later version of perl, won't install it. The downside is that you're running the older version. The upside is that you don't risk this newer version of perl breaking some other package that you'd forgotten. There are disadvantages--as the wiki page in question mentions, the late Seth Vidal disliked it. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] back to: kernel: do_IRQ: 2.96 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)
I asked here a week or so ago, and referenced an older bug, but haven't seen any comments. Googling, I see others asking about the same. Datum: *every* one I've found is like this: they're all HP DL580's or DL380's, or such. This is being used for heavy-duty scientific computing. Does anyone know if it *will* it seriously affect throughput speed if I turn off irqbalance? It's running 6.4, btw. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] back to: kernel: do_IRQ: 2.96 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)
- Original Message - | I asked here a week or so ago, and referenced an older bug, but | haven't | seen any comments. Googling, I see others asking about the same. | Datum: | *every* one I've found is like this: they're all HP DL580's or | DL380's, or | such. | | This is being used for heavy-duty scientific computing. Does anyone | know | if it *will* it seriously affect throughput speed if I turn off | irqbalance? | | It's running 6.4, btw. | | mark That really depends on the type of computing. If it's memory or CPU intensive computing it should have little to no affect. However, if you are doing heavy I/O intensive operations, more specifically network intensive, then yes, disabling irqbalance will have a fairly significant affect on performance for those operations. -- James A. Peltier Manager, IT Services - Research Computing Group Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpelt...@sfu.ca Website : http://www.sfu.ca/itservices “A successful person is one who can lay a solid foundation from the bricks others have thrown at them.” -David Brinkley via Luke Shaw ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] back to: kernel: do_IRQ: 2.96 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:32 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I asked here a week or so ago, and referenced an older bug, but haven't seen any comments. Googling, I see others asking about the same. Datum: *every* one I've found is like this: they're all HP DL580's or DL380's, or such. This is being used for heavy-duty scientific computing. Does anyone know if it *will* it seriously affect throughput speed if I turn off irqbalance? It's running 6.4, btw. mark You referred to http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6319 in your earlier post. If you believe you are hit by the bug reported there, I strongly urge you to test the centosplus kernel that has a patch (see note 17700 of the bug report). Regarding the current status, upstream BZ ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887006 ) is open to the public. It is on QA at the moment. I suspect the fix will be in EL6.5 and possibly in a 6.4 kernel update. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] samba: check password with AD without joining domain?
Is there a way to get samba to authenticate against an AD without having to join that domain (which needs admin credentials)?I don't want any of the automatic user creation or mapping stuff from winbind, just a password check instead of having to maintain a local password. I can get that effect via kerberos for normal linux logins by using authconfig-tui, checking kerberos, and filling in the domain/kdc details.Local users still have to be added to the linux system, but where the user names match they can authenticate with their domain password. But, samba doesn't work that way. Even though the authconfig program modifies the smb.conf file, it doesn't seem to work without joining the domain. Is it possible to make it just authenticate via kerberos but otherwise use the local account details for the matching user? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum-plugin-priorities
On 08/15/2013 01:07 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:07:26PM +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote: Clint Dilks wrote: If I add priority=1 to [updates] in CentOS-Base.repo when I run sudo yum update I get the warning 66 packages excluded due to repository priority protections See http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities ( take a close look at section 5 ) Thanks for your response. I had actually read this section, but evidently do not understand it. I take it the 66 packages mentioned are in unofficial repositories, in my case rpmforge.repo.rpmnew ? If you have a repo called something.repo.rpmnew, it will be ignored. You would have to rename it to something.repo. To oversimplify, say that you have rpmforge, base, and epel repos. Say that all of them have versions of perl. However, these versions may conflict with each other and break things. So, if you gave base and updates priority of 1, then the others, even if they have a later version of perl, won't install it. The downside is that you're running the older version. The upside is that you don't risk this newer version of perl breaking some other package that you'd forgotten. There are disadvantages--as the wiki page in question mentions, the late Seth Vidal disliked it. Warning: If you set priority of base repo to 1, and priority of updates repo (or all others) to 2, then packages in updates repository will be hidden. that is why it is so important to have same priority on both base and updates repositories. Any package name that exists in 2 or more repositories will be hidden from repositories with higher number / lesser priority (just like those 66 in your case). Example: httpd.x86_64 = ver. 2.2.15-26.el6.centos in base httpd.x86_64 = ver 2.2.15-28.el6.centos in updates httpd.x86_64 = ver. 2.2.15-29.el6.centos in updates With priority plugin: base=1, updates=2 (or nothing) 2 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Available: httpd.x86_64 = ver. 2.2.15-26.el6.centos from base With priority plugin: base=1, updates=1 (same priority) 0 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Available: httpd.x86_64 = ver. 2.2.15-29.el6.centos from updates -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] back to: kernel: do_IRQ: 2.96 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)
Hi, Akemi, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:32 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I asked here a week or so ago, and referenced an older bug, but haven't seen any comments. Googling, I see others asking about the same. Datum: *every* one I've found is like this: they're all HP DL580's or DL380's, or such. This is being used for heavy-duty scientific computing. Does anyone know if it *will* it seriously affect throughput speed if I turn off irqbalance? It's running 6.4, btw. You referred to http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6319 in your earlier post. If you believe you are hit by the bug reported there, I strongly urge you to test the centosplus kernel that has a patch (see note 17700 of the bug report). I'm checking with the system co-owner (the other co-owner is another Institute...), and that may take a while, because they've set up samba on it, so there's a number of folks hitting this box. Regarding the current status, upstream BZ ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887006 ) is open to the public. It is on QA at the moment. I suspect the fix will be in EL6.5 and possibly in a 6.4 kernel update. I see in the last message that I could set intremap=off on the grub kernel command line. It then mentions If intr-remap is turned off, you'll also have to add the kvm parameter to the boot line, or in an /etc/modprobe.d file, allow_unsafe_assigned_interrupts . Otherwise, kvm device assignment will fail.. Now, the only kvm I know is the virtual machine package; as there are no VMs running on this system, is this relevant to me? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS6 bind DLV problems
On 08/14/2013 07:14 PM, Tony Mountifield wrote: I have two CentOS6 boxes, both running Bind as a local resolver, with what appears to me to be the same configuration as each other. I have a problem on one but not the other, to do with DNSSEC Lookaside Validation. On the box with the problem, if I do: host www.bbc.co.uk 127.0.0.1 (for example), it sits there for a while, then gives me a timeout error. I did some tests while running a tcpdump packet capture on udp port 53, and I discovered that bind was fetching the correct answer normally, and then performing a validation query to one of the DLV servers at ISC (e.g. 199.6.0.29, 199.6.0.30, 199.6.1.29 or 199.6.1.30). It was not receiving any reply. After several seconds, it tried another DLV server and again received no reply. A similar test on the other box receives replies from ISC no problem. I have tried disabling iptables on the failing box, but that didn't help. I'm assuming something in the request causes ISC to ignore it. Have you tried to switch IP addresses and see if possible routing or public IP denial is in place? -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Red Hat CEO: Go Ahead, Copy Our Software
http://www.businessinsider.com/red-hat-ceo-go-ahead-copy-our-software-2013-8 Title says is all. Nice to know RH understands and accepts the relationship between CentOS and RHEL. Although it is complex. After all, if too many choose CentOS, there may no longer be a CentOS. However, I don't think I would refer to CentOS as a parasite as the author Matt Asay does. More appropriate to call it symbiotic. Is the relationship a 50/50 affair? Not sure. Complicating matters even more is Oracle Unmistakable Linux. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Red Hat CEO: Go Ahead, Copy Our Software
Robert Arkiletian wrote: http://www.businessinsider.com/red-hat-ceo-go-ahead-copy-our-software-2013-8 Title says is all. Nice to know RH understands and accepts the relationship between CentOS and RHEL. Although it is complex. After all, if too many choose CentOS, there may no longer be a CentOS. However, I don't think I would refer to CentOS as a parasite as the author Matt Asay does. More appropriate to call it symbiotic. Is the relationship a 50/50 affair? Not sure. Complicating matters even more is Oracle Unmistakable Linux. Yeah, and the author *really* doesn't understand, and didn't bother to try, to do their research. Excerpt: Arguably one critical area that CentOS hasn't helped Red Hat is with developers. While developers want the latest and greatest technology, Red Hat's bread-and-butter audience over the years has been operations departments, which want stable and predictable software. (Read: boring.) CentOS, by cloning RHEL's slow-and-steady approach to Linux development, is ill-suited to attracting developers. --- end excerpt --- As I said mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Red Hat CEO: Go Ahead, Copy Our Software
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:20 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Yeah, and the author *really* doesn't understand, and didn't bother to try, to do their research. Excerpt: Arguably one critical area that CentOS hasn't helped Red Hat is with developers. While developers want the latest and greatest technology, Red Hat's bread-and-butter audience over the years has been operations departments, which want stable and predictable software. (Read: boring.) CentOS, by cloning RHEL's slow-and-steady approach to Linux development, is ill-suited to attracting developers. --- end excerpt --- How about the real history, where Red Hat took a bunch of software developed by others, published the barely-working stuff with horrible bugs (read the changelogs if you disagree), then accepted contributed debugging, fixes and improvements from the users until it was good enough to charge for, then they cut off access even to the people who had helped make it usable. And CentOS helps fix that problem. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Red Hat CEO: Go Ahead, Copy Our Software
I have no problems with RedHat and have used CEntOS steadily for quite some time now. Even though it's at home on my personal machines, I have been aching for my company to adopt an open source alternative to the five or six Windows 2008 servers that are currently in place...and I've made progess! So MUCH progress that in another month I'm to have a sit-down with the higher-ups from Accounting...IT...and Corporate to determine if my suggestion warrants merit, and if sohow to go about implementing itwhen I finally do get my chance on the mike so to speak?...I'll be recommending both Red Hat AND CEntOS.as they're basically the same thing...and the things I won't be able to troubleshoot myself...I'll have the RedHat Tech Support handle. Either way I see it as a win-win situation. The author might have flubbed a few things...as others have stated, CEntOS...isn't a parasite to RedHatbut more a sibling. And RedHat really DOESN'T own any of the source code it sells! but hey...everyone makes mistakes!..LoL! I will say this: I have used Windows since the Win '95 era, and even though they have come a long way, I have not enjoyed using my computers as much as when I installed Linux, and not just CEntOSbut Fedora...UbuntuopenSuSE..Debianetc. I wish there was a way to return' the favor to al lthe developers and contributors to the Open Source movement! Cheers! EGO II On 08/15/2013 04:59 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 3:20 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Yeah, and the author *really* doesn't understand, and didn't bother to try, to do their research. Excerpt: Arguably one critical area that CentOS hasn't helped Red Hat is with developers. While developers want the latest and greatest technology, Red Hat's bread-and-butter audience over the years has been operations departments, which want stable and predictable software. (Read: boring.) CentOS, by cloning RHEL's slow-and-steady approach to Linux development, is ill-suited to attracting developers. --- end excerpt --- How about the real history, where Red Hat took a bunch of software developed by others, published the barely-working stuff with horrible bugs (read the changelogs if you disagree), then accepted contributed debugging, fixes and improvements from the users until it was good enough to charge for, then they cut off access even to the people who had helped make it usable. And CentOS helps fix that problem. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Red Hat CEO: Go Ahead, Copy Our Software
On 8/15/2013 2:22 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote: And RedHat really DOESN'T own any of the source code it sells! redhat doesn't sell the source code. they sell their support services and infrastructure. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Red Hat CEO: Go Ahead, Copy Our Software
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: How about the real history, where Red Hat took a bunch of software developed by others, published the barely-working stuff with horrible bugs (read the changelogs if you disagree), then accepted contributed debugging, fixes and improvements from the users until it was good enough to charge for, then they cut off access even to the people who had helped make it usable. And CentOS helps fix that problem so what what about live and let live? What about bait and switch? remove anything delevoped by RH paied employes in the last 10 years from the ecosystem and you stay here naked and helpless and most other distributions too in case of modern and rock solid software Remove the stuff contributed by others and what would still work at all? GCC and the kernel are only two but importnat pieces where Redhat invested a lot of time and money over the years so whats your problem? I guess I'd rather have seen the contributed work go to a distribution that didn't develop a community with a free version and then after accepting their work, take the free version away. CentOS still gives the same effect, so why didn't they just continue to allow redistribution? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Red Hat CEO: Go Ahead, Copy Our Software
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 04:40:14PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: What about bait and switch? What about the fact that you've been beating this same horse for many years now and it's a little tired at this point? I guess I'd rather have seen the contributed work go to a distribution that didn't develop a community with a free version and then after accepting their work, take the free version away. CentOS still gives the same effect, so why didn't they just continue to allow redistribution? If you're so disgruntled with Red Hat, and from the many years of beaten horse posts it's clearly evident that you are, why do you continue to use their components? CentOS originates with Red Hat no matter how you care to look at it. John -- The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently. -- Friedrich Nietzsche pgp4PGu2XgomD.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] samba: check password with AD without joining domain?
Do you require samba or do you just want linux users to authenticate to AD? Samba when configured to work in a domain must be joined to the AD domain. By the way, unless the admins have changed the defaults, any authenticated user can join up to 10 hosts to an AD domain (search ms-DS-MachineAccountQuota on your favorite search engine). If you want your linux hosts to login using AD credentials, I haven't tried it yet, but using sssd with msktutil should work with some trial and error: http://theblitzbit.com/2013/04/08/make-red-hat-talk-to-windows/ instead of using the samba bits, use msktutil, works much better (rpms in repoforge). The rest should be the same. -- Groeten, natxo On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a way to get samba to authenticate against an AD without having to join that domain (which needs admin credentials)?I don't want any of the automatic user creation or mapping stuff from winbind, just a password check instead of having to maintain a local password. I can get that effect via kerberos for normal linux logins by using authconfig-tui, checking kerberos, and filling in the domain/kdc details.Local users still have to be added to the linux system, but where the user names match they can authenticate with their domain password. But, samba doesn't work that way. Even though the authconfig program modifies the smb.conf file, it doesn't seem to work without joining the domain. Is it possible to make it just authenticate via kerberos but otherwise use the local account details for the matching user? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Red Hat CEO: Go Ahead, Copy Our Software
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:45 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote: What about bait and switch? What about the fact that you've been beating this same horse for many years now and it's a little tired at this point? They are the ones that changed their position. Mine hasn't and won't. And I can't see a reason why it should. If you're so disgruntled with Red Hat, and from the many years of beaten horse posts it's clearly evident that you are, why do you continue to use their components? CentOS originates with Red Hat no matter how you care to look at it. If you are so happy with Red Hat, why even consider CentOS? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Red Hat CEO: Go Ahead, Copy Our Software
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: are you really that dumb? take the free version away - come on and explain how this works for GPL software Exactly, explain where the GPL distinguishes between what restrictions you can add to binaries vs source components. Redhat *does not* sell the software and code they sell the service and support contracts So, what about redistribution of copies? why are you not simply use a operating system without code from Redhat and shut up? Windows and Apple OSX as example would free you from Redhat and CentOS come on, move forward if you are pissed of Redhat for no reason! I could use debian, but then I'd have to learn to type apt-get instead of rpm. I'd prefer to continue using the commands that Red Hat baited us with. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Red Hat CEO: Go Ahead, Copy Our Software
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: So, what about redistribution of copies? learn the difference between trademarks and software licences So, if you have a license that says the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of this License, and You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein, it really means that you can add something that adds restrictions. I could use debian, but then I'd have to learn to type apt-get instead of rpm. I'd prefer to continue using the commands that Red Hat baited us with so learn it or shut up with your Redhat hate for no reason I have my reason. You don't have to like it. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum-plugin-priorities
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: To oversimplify, say that you have rpmforge, base, and epel repos. Say that all of them have versions of perl. However, these versions may conflict with each other and break things. So, if you gave base and updates priority of 1, then the others, even if they have a later version of perl, won't install it. The downside is that you're running the older version. The upside is that you don't risk this newer version of perl breaking some other package that you'd forgotten. But what if a package in rpmforge requires a newer version of a package that is available in rpmforge but not in updates? Surely this is very likely to happen? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum-plugin-priorities
Timothy Murphy wrote: But what if a package in rpmforge requires a newer version of a package that is available in rpmforge but not in updates? Surely this is very likely to happen? If a package in RPMForge requires another package from RPMForge that doesn't conflict with a package from Base or Updates, then the second package will be installed. If a package in RPMForge requires another package from RPMForge that _does_ conflict with a package from Base or Updates, then the second package won't be installed, and neither will the first package. That's what's supposed to happen. By design, CentOS is a conservative and stable distribution. If you need the latest packages, CentOS isn't the right distribution for you. Yves Bellefeuille y...@storm.ca ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] samba: check password with AD without joining domain?
Last time I checked a few years ago I don't think AD supported an LDAP anonymous bind, so you may need to bind as that user in order to validate the creds. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] samba: check password with AD without joining domain?
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 06:40:54PM -0700, Devin Reade wrote: Last time I checked a few years ago I don't think AD supported an LDAP anonymous bind, so you may need to bind as that user in order to validate the creds. AD is kerberos for authentication. If you just want to authenticate user xyzzy to AD with password (as opposed to krb keys) then just configure /etc/krb5.conf to point to an AD domain controller. Don't need LDAP at all. Everything else (samba, ldap, etc) gives closer integration, but isn't essential for pure 'AD password' authentication. -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] samba: check password with AD without joining domain?
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 06:40:54PM -0700, Devin Reade wrote: Last time I checked a few years ago I don't think AD supported an LDAP anonymous bind, so you may need to bind as that user in order to validate the creds. AD is kerberos for authentication. If you just want to authenticate user xyzzy to AD with password (as opposed to krb keys) then just configure /etc/krb5.conf to point to an AD domain controller. Don't need LDAP at all. Everything else (samba, ldap, etc) gives closer integration, but isn't essential for pure 'AD password' authentication. Authconfig sets that up with pam when you pick kerberos authentication and it works fine for linux user logins (console, ssh, etc.). What I want in addition is for those users to be able to map their home directories from a windows box using that same login/password. I don't really care if they have to enter it explicitly for the share or if whatever windows does because they are already logged into the domain, I just don't want to manage a separate copy of each user's password. And what authconfig puts in the smb.conf doesn't seem to work that way. I used to be able to use security=server against an older style windows domain controller, but I think the AD domain has been upgraded and no longer has that backwards compatibility mode. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
