Re: [CentOS-es] CentOS Dojo en Madrid
Hola, gracias Yanis, tienes razón, culpa mía. Aprovecho también para comentar que el día de antes del CentOS Dojo se celebrará en el mismo sitio un tutorial de 4h de OpenNebula: http://blog.opennebula.org/?p=5284 El tutorial será gratis para todos los participantes del CentOS Dojo. Un saludo, Jaime 2013/10/24 Yanis Guenane yguen...@gmail.com Una corrección, es el 8 de noviembre ;) Saludos, -- Yanis Guenane 2013/10/24 Jaime Melis jme...@opennebula.org Hola a todos, El próximo 8 de octubre se celebrará en Madrid una nueva edición de CentOS Dojo. Los CentOS Dojo son eventos de un solo día, que se organizan en el mundo entero, y que reúnen a las comunidades de CentOS para hablar de administración de sistemas, mejores prácticas en el mundo linux, y de tecnologías emergentes. El énfasis reside en reunir gente del área local para hablar de los temas más importantes y compartir experencias al trabajar con CentOS en diferentes escenarios. Más información del próximo evento de Madrid en este link: http://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Madrid2013 Un saludo, Jaime -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- *Yanis Guenane* ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Jaime Melis Project Engineer OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple www.OpenNebula.org | jme...@opennebula.org ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 104, Issue 13
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2013:1457 Moderate CentOS 6 libgcrypt Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CESA-2013:1459 Moderate CentOS 6 gnupg2 Update (Johnny Hughes)
3. CESA-2013:1459 Moderate CentOS 5 gnupg2 Update (Johnny Hughes)
4. CESA-2013:1458 Moderate CentOS 5 gnupg Update (Johnny Hughes)
5. CESA-2013:1457 Moderate CentOS 5 libgcrypt Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:06:22 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:1457 Moderate CentOS 6 libgcrypt
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20131024160622.ga17...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1457 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1457.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
800d11a507a330b28e59d300bf7383b19c95b5a857863b1501b8aa1f0b9388dc
libgcrypt-1.4.5-11.el6_4.i686.rpm
d97f0c12e08acb0844404a6ba4ab288d20dcf2a16d03bcf5647b05eba3e98f65
libgcrypt-devel-1.4.5-11.el6_4.i686.rpm
x86_64:
800d11a507a330b28e59d300bf7383b19c95b5a857863b1501b8aa1f0b9388dc
libgcrypt-1.4.5-11.el6_4.i686.rpm
bdda38f5a6dbfe6a1d07dd6d5f38aace66ff0a19c4575c834a6fdb0f8a226c01
libgcrypt-1.4.5-11.el6_4.x86_64.rpm
d97f0c12e08acb0844404a6ba4ab288d20dcf2a16d03bcf5647b05eba3e98f65
libgcrypt-devel-1.4.5-11.el6_4.i686.rpm
472773662216defd7ac43f73dac325fca2402009ffdf11d81efc6fe16b86c4c3
libgcrypt-devel-1.4.5-11.el6_4.x86_64.rpm
Source:
c963b5bf4c84d5798d987e86b4e600ce3c7ae03e035096d88982385a81dcdbbc
libgcrypt-1.4.5-11.el6_4.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:06:44 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:1459 Moderate CentOS 6 gnupg2
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20131024160644.ga17...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1459 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1459.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
6aa89f96d1cfd8908fd626383bdc3b4c005791e2cd640f4f4378f927b4bf1f17
gnupg2-2.0.14-6.el6_4.i686.rpm
aaf1056582718786d36262f305ed609c7175ccc29c3dbe1875bd75f4c710b871
gnupg2-smime-2.0.14-6.el6_4.i686.rpm
x86_64:
71bc0bf467b5d366a6811846d2177f841de438ee60754f26dc57c1d3ab26cf23
gnupg2-2.0.14-6.el6_4.x86_64.rpm
3e90ca1a588ae05a452d271119e09a1d0c31e4bd3da230ee7ef498831d3e5b5e
gnupg2-smime-2.0.14-6.el6_4.x86_64.rpm
Source:
44fcd477f37bc5265ff0632afd7fc43bd4545ab32456023cdaec32345c2d4561
gnupg2-2.0.14-6.el6_4.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:57:55 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:1459 Moderate CentOS 5 gnupg2
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20131025135755.ga20...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1459 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1459.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
4cd2743e8d15398c794621c8bf76c1d36d506fb96a23dd8c62f9998be18ee3aa
gnupg2-2.0.10-6.el5_10.i386.rpm
x86_64:
4280bb73c87920955b050fbcf66a209eeedc8ebbdba66841df92814b9a805b35
gnupg2-2.0.10-6.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
Source:
7cf4ba0a1bf3d9ea6055f45cfadcc788bccd6b001e1b411bb374c1c75c83412f
gnupg2-2.0.10-6.el5_10.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:00:34 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:1458 Moderate CentOS 5 gnupg
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20131025140034.ga21...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1458 Moderate
Upstream details at :
Re: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux in production?
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 01:41:17PM -0700, Lists wrote: We are a CentOS shop, and have the lucky, fortunate problem of having ever-increasing amounts of data to manage. EXT3/4 becomes tough to manage when you start climbing, especially when you have to upgrade, so we're contemplating switching to ZFS. As of last spring, it appears that ZFS On Linux http://zfsonlinux.org/ calls itself production ready despite a version number of 0.6.2, and being acknowledged as unstable on 32 bit systems. However, given the need to do backups, zfs send sounds like a godsend over rsync which is running into scaling problems of its own. (EG: Nightly backups are being threatened by the possibility of taking over 24 hours per backup) Was wondering if anybody here could weigh in with real-life experience? Performance/scalability? -Ben PS: I joined their mailing list recently, will be watching there as well. We will, of course, be testing for a while before making the switch. Joining the discussion late, and don't really have anything to contribute on the ZFSonLinux side of things... At $DAYJOB we have been running ZFS via Nexenta (previously via Solaris 10) for many years. We have about 5PB of this and the primary use case is for backups and handling of imagery. For the most part, we really, really like ZFS. My feeling is that ZFS itself (at least in the *Solaris form) is rock solid and stable. Other pieces of the stack -- namely SMB/CIFS and some of the management tools provided by the various vendors are a bit more questionable. We spend a bit more time fighting weirdnesses with things higher up the stack than we do say on our NetApp environment. Too be expected. I'm waiting for Red Hat or someone else to come out and support ZFS -- perhaps unlikely due to legality questions, but if I could marry the power of ZFS with the software stack in Linux (Samba!!), I'd be mighty happy. Yes -- we could run Samba on our Nexenta boxes, but it isn't supported. Echo'ing what many others say: - ZFS is memory hungry. All of our PRD boxes have 144GB of memory in them, and some have SSD's for ZIL or L2ARC depending on the workload. - Powerful redundancy is possible. Our environment is built on top of Dell MD1200 JBOD's all dual pathed up to dual LSI SAS switches. Our vdev's (RAID groups) are sized to match the number of JBODs with the invididual disks spread across each JBOD. We use triple parity RAID (RAIDZ3) and as such can lose three entire JBODs without suffering any data loss. We actually had one JBOD go flaky on us and were able to hot yank it out, put in a new one with zero downtime (and much shorter resilver/rebuild times than you'd get with regular RAID). - We make heavy use of snapshots and clones. Probably have 200-300 on some sysems and we use them to do release management for collections of imagery. Very powerful and haven't run into performance issues yet. * Snapshots let us take diffs between versions quite easily. We then stream these diffs to an identical ZFS system at a DR site and merge in the changes. Our network pipe isn't big enough yet to do this quickly, so we typically just plug in another SAS JBOD with a zpool on it, stream the diffs there as a flat file, sneakernet the JBOD to the DR site, plug it in, import the zpool and slurp in the differences. Pretty cool. As I mentioned, we have run into a few weird quirks. Mainly around stability of the management GUI (or lack of basic features like useful SNMP based monitoring), performance with CIFS and oddnesses like high system load in certain edge cases. Some general rough edges I suppose that we've been OK dealing with. The Nexenta guys are super smart, but of course they're a smaller shop and don't have the resources behind them that CentOS does with Red Hat. My guess is that this would be exacerbated to some extent on the Linux platform at this point. I personally wouldn't want to use ZFS on Linux for our customer data serving workloads, but might consider it for something purely internal. Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux in production?
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 01:59:15PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: On 10/24/2013 1:41 PM, Lists wrote: Was wondering if anybody here could weigh in with real-life experience? Performance/scalability? I've only used ZFS on Solaris and FreeBSD.some general observations... 1) you need a LOT of ram for decent performance on large zpools. 1GB ram above your basic system/application requirements per terabyte of zpool is not unreasonable. 2) don't go overboard with snapshots. a few 100 are probably OK, but 1000s (*) will really drag down the performance of operations that enumerate file systems. 3) NEVER let a zpool fill up above about 70% full, or the performance really goes downhill. Have run into this one (again -- with Nexenta) as well. It can be pretty dramatic. We tend to set quotas to ensure we don'get exceed 75% or so max, but ...at least on the Solaris side, there's a tunable you can set that keeps the metaslab (which gets fragmented and inefficient when pool utilization is high) entirely in memory. This completely resolves our throughput issue, but does require that you have sufficient memory to load the thing... echo metaslab_debug/W 1 | mdb -kw There may be a ZOL equivalent. 4) I prefer using striped mirrors (aka raid10) over raidz/z2, but my applications are primarily database. (*) ran into a guy who had 100s of zfs 'file systems' (mount points), per user home directories, and was doing nightly snapshots going back several years, and his zfs commands were taking a long long time to do anything, and he couldn't figure out why. I think he had over 10,000 filesystems * snapshots. Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] VNC
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Earl Ramirez earlarami...@gmail.comwrote: On Sun, 2013-10-20 at 07:44 -0600, Larry Martell wrote: On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Earl A Ramirez earlarami...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry for top posting, this is the only option that the phone allow. If the host is running a X server you can use -X option with ssh. $ ssh -X user@host And start virt-manager to manage the VMs. I am running putty from Windows. I do have X11 forwarding enabled. But I still get 'could not open display' I though perhaps I needed to install Xming, but I don't have admin rights on the Windows box, so I couldn't do that. Hello Larry, Were you able to connect to the VM using VNC? No, no one there could make it work on a VM. I switched to using a physical host. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] baby blue screen of permanent death
Absent other ideas, I might try re-installing CentOS or re-installing X. I have a pretty good idea how to do the former, but the latter might be harder despite, in principle, being less intrusive. My understand is that unistalling X will normally take all its dependents will it. That means That I will have to re-install said dependents, possibly listing each one separately. My thought is to /usr/bin/script yum's output into a file. I'd use the file to produce another yum commmand to reinstall X's dependents. Does that seem like a good plan? To reinstall CentOS, I would back up things that needed backing up. I would use yum to list all installed packages. I would use my grub menu to select the same stanza that I used to do a net-install of CentOS. It might be nice to use a kickstart file, but I do not know how. After the install, I would restore the directory that listed all my repositories. This is a step I am not sure about. I have a vague recollection that that is not sufficient. What else would I need to do? I would use the yum listing to install everything I have now. Does this seem like a good plan? -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu On Monday, I'm gonna have to tell my kindergarten class, whom I teach not to run with scissors, that my fiance ran me through with a broadsword. -- Lily ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] baby blue screen of permanent death
On 10/27/2013 07:03 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote: Absent other ideas, I might try re-installing CentOS or re-installing X. I have a pretty good idea how to do the former, but the latter might be harder despite, in principle, being less intrusive. My understand is that unistalling X will normally take all its dependents will it. That means That I will have to re-install said dependents, possibly listing each one separately. My thought is to /usr/bin/script yum's output into a file. I'd use the file to produce another yum commmand to reinstall X's dependents. Does that seem like a good plan? To reinstall CentOS, I would back up things that needed backing up. I would use yum to list all installed packages. I would use my grub menu to select the same stanza that I used to do a net-install of CentOS. It might be nice to use a kickstart file, but I do not know how. After the install, I would restore the directory that listed all my repositories. This is a step I am not sure about. I have a vague recollection that that is not sufficient. What else would I need to do? I would use the yum listing to install everything I have now. Does this seem like a good plan? Way too much work. Why not yum reinstall package names That will ensure that all package contents are correctly installed..?? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] VNC
On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 11:26 -0600, Larry Martell wrote: On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Earl Ramirez earlarami...@gmail.comwrote: On Sun, 2013-10-20 at 07:44 -0600, Larry Martell wrote: On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Earl A Ramirez earlarami...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry for top posting, this is the only option that the phone allow. If the host is running a X server you can use -X option with ssh. $ ssh -X user@host And start virt-manager to manage the VMs. I am running putty from Windows. I do have X11 forwarding enabled. But I still get 'could not open display' I though perhaps I needed to install Xming, but I don't have admin rights on the Windows box, so I couldn't do that. Hello Larry, Were you able to connect to the VM using VNC? No, no one there could make it work on a VM. I switched to using a physical host. I will be able to replicate your environment within a few days are you willing to give it another shot? SilverTip257 had an interesting question with regards to how the network is setup. I'm assuming that the host has a bridge nic compared to the bridge that is created by libvirtd virbr0, which has the default network of 192.168.122.0/24. Can you confirm my assumption and let me know if you are willing to continue to work on a resolution. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Kind Regards Earl Ramirez GPG Key: http://trinipino.com/PublicKey.asc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 6.4, LAMP, MariaDB
Hi, I am trying to install a LAMP stack using MariaDB on CentOS 6.4, 64 bit. I have installed MariaDB by using the MariaDB repository configuraton tool. I installed php by itself. Both MariaDB and php individually test fine. I know that php-mysql has to be installed to complete the LAMP stack installation. From lots of googling I understand that there is a php-mysql and a php-mysqlnd. If I do: # yum list | grep -i php-mysql I only get php-mysql, not php-mysqlnd, even though the MariaDB repository is active. Will php-mysql work or should I try to find mysqlnd? FYI: I installed LAMP with MariaDB on a Fedora 19 box and, I don't remember how, php-mysqlnd was installed. Thank you, Joe Hesse ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4, LAMP, MariaDB
On 10/26/2013 05:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 26.10.2013 23:37, schrieb Joseph Hesse: I know that php-mysql has to be installed to complete the LAMP stack installation. From lots of googling I understand that there is a php-mysql and a php-mysqlnd. If I do: # yum list | grep -i php-mysql I only get php-mysql, not php-mysqlnd, even though the MariaDB repository is active. CentOS != Fedora Will php-mysql work or should I try to find mysqlnd? maybe you should read what myqsqlnd is at all http://www.php.net/manual/en/intro.mysqlnd.php it is a different *low-level* abstraction compared to libmysql and so the question is nonsense from the view of php scripts there is no difference hence you can even compile php with libmysqlnd without provide any loadable extension FYI: I installed LAMP with MariaDB on a Fedora 19 box and, I don't remember how, php-mysqlnd was installed CentOS/RHEL != Fedora Thank you for your reply. What I want to do is install WordPress on a CentOS 6.4 server using MariDB. According to the WordPress documentation you need a LAMP server. I have installed MariaDB and php. What else do I have to install to get a functioning LAMP server? Thank you in advance. Joe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux in production?
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 01:59:15PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote: On 10/24/2013 1:41 PM, Lists wrote: Was wondering if anybody here could weigh in with real-life experience? Performance/scalability? I've only used ZFS on Solaris and FreeBSD.some general observations... 1) you need a LOT of ram for decent performance on large zpools. 1GB ram above your basic system/application requirements per terabyte of zpool is not unreasonable. 2) don't go overboard with snapshots. a few 100 are probably OK, but 1000s (*) will really drag down the performance of operations that enumerate file systems. 3) NEVER let a zpool fill up above about 70% full, or the performance really goes downhill. Have run into this one (again -- with Nexenta) as well. It can be pretty dramatic. We tend to set quotas to ensure we don'get exceed 75% or so max, but We maybe getting a bit off topic here but on that subject we have noticed a significant degrade in performance on systems running at 75-80 % of their pool capacity. I understand that the nature of COW will increase fragmentation. On large storages though 70% out of 100TB means that you have to always maintain 30TB free which is not a small number in terms of cost per TB. - George Kontostanos --- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Network Problem on New Install of 6.4
I have a new install of CentOS 6.4 on an HP Pavilion 500-27c with one mother board nic card. results of lspci : 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR8161 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 04:00.0 Network controller: Ralink corp. Device 539b results of ifconfig -a lo Link encap:Local Loopback wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 70:18:8B:80:AE:71 There is no /etc/sysconfig/network file present. The install was performed without incident from a DVD. I would surely appreciate your help in trying to activate this network. Is this a problem with the 6.4 disc or do I have a network card on this machine that is not supported by 6.4 -- Greg Ennis PoMec Corporation www.PoMec.Net ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network Problem on New Install of 6.4
Are there any messages in the logs? In particular 'dmesg' messages. (I don't have a CentOS system right here so I can't see which log is appropriate.) Is there a DHCP server on the network? A little more detail on your situation would be handy. Is this a home network with ADSL or similar? Cheers, Cliff On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote: I have a new install of CentOS 6.4 on an HP Pavilion 500-27c with one mother board nic card. results of lspci : 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR8161 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 04:00.0 Network controller: Ralink corp. Device 539b results of ifconfig -a lo Link encap:Local Loopback wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 70:18:8B:80:AE:71 There is no /etc/sysconfig/network file present. The install was performed without incident from a DVD. I would surely appreciate your help in trying to activate this network. Is this a problem with the 6.4 disc or do I have a network card on this machine that is not supported by 6.4 -- Greg Ennis PoMec Corporation www.PoMec.Net ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network Problem on New Install of 6.4
Cliff, Thanks for your help. This machine is scheduled to be a mail server for a business with a static ip address behind an ATT Uverse router. There were no entries in the /var/log/messages that I could identify as errors. There was no dhcp exposure during the intallation; I planned to manually enter the ip, gateway, dns addresses, and subnet after the installation. The problem apparent was that the customary eth0 was not present for me to edit. I have now taken the server back to my lab, and still am not able to get to the network card. Any suggestions before I try CentOS 5.9 would sure be beneficial. Greg - Are there any messages in the logs? In particular 'dmesg' messages. (I don't have a CentOS system right here so I can't see which log is appropriate.) Is there a DHCP server on the network? A little more detail on your situation would be handy. Is this a home network with ADSL or similar? Cheers, Cliff On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote: I have a new install of CentOS 6.4 on an HP Pavilion 500-27c with one mother board nic card. results of lspci : 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR8161 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 04:00.0 Network controller: Ralink corp. Device 539b results of ifconfig -a lo Link encap:Local Loopback wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 70:18:8B:80:AE:71 There is no /etc/sysconfig/network file present. The install was performed without incident from a DVD. I would surely appreciate your help in trying to activate this network. Is this a problem with the 6.4 disc or do I have a network card on this machine that is not supported by 6.4 -- Greg Ennis PoMec Corporation www.PoMec.Net ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network Problem on New Install of 6.4
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote: I have a new install of CentOS 6.4 on an HP Pavilion 500-27c with one mother board nic card. results of lspci : 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR8161 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 04:00.0 Network controller: Ralink corp. Device 539b Please take a look at ELRepo's FAQ #4 ( http://elrepo.org/tiki/FAQ ) and determine the vendor:device ID pairing. It will help you find an appropriate driver. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network Problem on New Install of 6.4
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote: I have a new install of CentOS 6.4 on an HP Pavilion 500-27c with one mother board nic card. results of lspci : 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR8161 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 04:00.0 Network controller: Ralink corp. Device 539b Please take a look at ELRepo's FAQ #4 ( http://elrepo.org/tiki/FAQ ) and determine the vendor:device ID pairing. It will help you find an appropriate driver. Akemi ___ Akemi, That seemed to be a good start. I determined that there were three rpm's that satisfied the id pairing : kmod-alx-0.0-2.20121003.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm 22-Dec-2012 12:32 77K kmod-alx-0.0-6.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm17-Jul-2013 21:58 32K kmod-alx-0.0-7.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm30-Jul-2013 00:58 32K I installed the first one and the system would not boot. I am in the process of reinstalling 6.4 and will try the 0.0.7 next. Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] baby blue screen of permanent death
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013, Rob Kampen wrote: On 10/27/2013 07:03 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote: Absent other ideas, I might try re-installing CentOS or re-installing X. I have a pretty good idea how to do the former, but the latter might be harder despite, in principle, being less intrusive. My understand is that unistalling X will normally take all its dependents will it. That means That I will have to re-install said dependents, possibly listing each one separately. My thought is to /usr/bin/script yum's output into a file. I'd use the file to produce another yum commmand to reinstall X's dependents. Does that seem like a good plan? Way too much work. Why not yum reinstall package names That will ensure that all package contents are correctly installed..?? Would yum reinstall X reinstall X's dependents? If not, I still need the list of package names that depend on X. Telling yum, at least tentatively, to remove X would seem to be the simplest way. I really do not want to do any more experiments than I have to. -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu On Monday, I'm gonna have to tell my kindergarten class, whom I teach not to run with scissors, that my fiance ran me through with a broadsword. -- Lily ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network Problem on New Install of 6.4
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote: I have a new install of CentOS 6.4 on an HP Pavilion 500-27c with one mother board nic card. results of lspci : 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR8161 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 04:00.0 Network controller: Ralink corp. Device 539b Please take a look at ELRepo's FAQ #4 ( http://elrepo.org/tiki/FAQ ) and determine the vendor:device ID pairing. It will help you find an appropriate driver. Akemi ___ Akemi, That seemed to be a good start. I determined that there were three rpm's that satisfied the id pairing : kmod-alx-0.0-2.20121003.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm 22-Dec-2012 12:32 77K kmod-alx-0.0-6.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm17-Jul-2013 21:58 32K kmod-alx-0.0-7.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm30-Jul-2013 00:58 32K I installed the first one and the system would not boot. I am in the process of reinstalling 6.4 and will try the 0.0.7 next. Greg Akemi, kmod-alx-0.0.7 was the rpm that worked. I had to rebuild the entire os, and then had to add the /etc/sysconfig/network file, but after these steps I got it to work. Thanks much for your assistance!! Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
