Re: [CentOS] Install to internal USB?

[John R Pierce]

On 11/8/2013 11:01 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
> Some of the newer workstation/server boards have an internal USB
> (female) connector soldered on to the board; specifically meant for
> embedded OS.I have seen it on the Supermicro and Dell systems.

personally, I'd as soon use a CF or SD card for this, but ah well.

my home HP Microserver, running FreeNAS, has a sandisk USB stick plugged 
into its internal USB jack on the main board.   has been working great 
for a year.   occassionally I backup the configuration file so if the 
stick dies, in theory I make a new one and slap the XML file on it and 
reboot.



-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Install to internal USB?

[Arun Khan]

On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Lists  wrote:
> Saw a trick today, wondering if anybody else had done/tried this? Assume
> you have a 1U rackmount with 4 front-accessed drive bays, and you want
> all four bays for a 4-disk RAID5 storage.
>
> The idea is to use an internal USB adapter and a couple of bigger USB
> thumb drives to install to, RAID 1 style, freeing up all your external
> drive bays. At first, I didn't think that a thumb drive would hold
> enough for the O/S, but in actual production use for a file server with
> 14 TB of redundant storage, the OS actually uses less than 6 GB!
>
> Here's the internal USB adapter specifically mentioned:
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B007PODI1W
>

Some of the newer workstation/server boards have an internal USB
(female) connector soldered on to the board; specifically meant for
embedded OS.I have seen it on the Supermicro and Dell systems.

> I'd be concerned about getting a higher quality drive than the $10
> givaways at Staples; Anybody here ever tried this?

Make sure you do buy industrial quality USB pen drives.  I use Apacer
but there are others in the market.

I prefer to use SATA Disk on Modules (DoM).  For basic server install
a 2GB DoM is plenty.

In either case, do not put swap on the flash drive.

-- Arun Khan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Installing CentOS via USB thumbdrive

[John R Pierce]

On 11/8/2013 4:58 PM, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> I'll find a USB DVD drive and use that, until a hybrid ISO becomes available.

this has worked for me, using a Windows machine to prep the USB stick
http://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=29829

and this tool was even easier to use, you can setup the USB stick on 
either a windows or linux box.
http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/

I nearly always use the CentOS 6 MINIMAL install, its hardly bigger than 
the NETINSTALL, and less hassle to setup.  once its up and running, I 
yum install anything else I need.   I prefer minimal installs to very 
comprehensive ones, yum updates are much faster when you aren't updating 
tons of packages you'll never use.



-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Installing CentOS via USB thumbdrive

[Joseph Spenner]

> On Nov 8, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Yves Bellefeuille  wrote:
> 
> On Friday 08 November 2013, Joseph Spenner  
> wrote:
> 
>> I've been poking at this for quite a while, and have never been able
>> to get it to work. 
> 
> Have a look at this thread: 
> http://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4478
> 


Just checked it out.
Looks like a lot of frustrated people, with no real resolution.
I'll find a USB DVD drive and use that, until a hybrid ISO becomes available.

Thanks!

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Installing CentOS via USB thumbdrive

[Yves Bellefeuille]

On Friday 08 November 2013, Joseph Spenner  
wrote:

> I've been poking at this for quite a while, and have never been able
>  to get it to work. 

Have a look at this thread: 
http://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4478

-- 
Yves Bellefeuille 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Install to internal USB?

[Jim Wise]

On Nov 8, 2013, at 17:48 , John R Pierce  wrote:

> On 11/8/2013 2:40 PM, Jim Wise wrote:
>> It’s worth noting that FreeNAS does more or less exactly this, using a USB 
>> drive with a more-or-less read-only OS image to serve some number of 
>> spinning or flash disks.
> 
> yeah, but whats on that USB stick is mostly a single file thats loaded 
> into a ramdrive, and a single XML file thats updated when you make 
> configuration changes, which typically isn't very often...


Yeah, true.

How close is Centos (or the upstream) to being able to run with all but /var 
and /tmp readonly?

-- 
Jim Wise
jw...@draga.com






signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Install to internal USB?

[John R Pierce]

On 11/8/2013 2:40 PM, Jim Wise wrote:
> It’s worth noting that FreeNAS does more or less exactly this, using a USB 
> drive with a more-or-less read-only OS image to serve some number of spinning 
> or flash disks.

yeah, but whats on that USB stick is mostly a single file thats loaded 
into a ramdrive, and a single XML file thats updated when you make 
configuration changes, which typically isn't very often...



-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Install to internal USB?

[Jim Wise]

On Nov 8, 2013, at 17:12 , Lists  wrote:

> On 11/08/2013 02:06 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 11/8/2013 12:57 PM, Lists wrote:
>>> Saw a trick today, wondering if anybody else had done/tried this? Assume
>>> you have a 1U rackmount with 4 front-accessed drive bays, and you want
>>> all four bays for a 4-disk RAID5 storage.
>>> 
>>> The idea is to use an internal USB adapter and a couple of bigger USB
>>> thumb drives to install to, RAID 1 style, freeing up all your external
>>> drive bays. At first, I didn't think that a thumb drive would hold
>>> enough for the O/S, but in actual production use for a file server with
>>> 14 TB of redundant storage, the OS actually uses less than 6 GB!
>> USB thumb drives are really not that suitable for anything doing random
>> writes, lots of small files, etc.
>> 
> Agreed! In the case of a file store, there isn't a whole lot going on 
> with the O/S drive, just the drives that the O/S is hosting. The 
> original post recommended that /var/log be run off the big partition 
> being hosted (on spinning disks) to minimize writes to the flash drives.


It’s worth noting that FreeNAS does more or less exactly this, using a USB 
drive with a more-or-less read-only OS image to serve some number of spinning 
or flash disks.

-- 
Jim Wise
jw...@draga.com






signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Install to internal USB?

[Lists]

On 11/08/2013 02:06 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 11/8/2013 12:57 PM, Lists wrote:
>> Saw a trick today, wondering if anybody else had done/tried this? Assume
>> you have a 1U rackmount with 4 front-accessed drive bays, and you want
>> all four bays for a 4-disk RAID5 storage.
>>
>> The idea is to use an internal USB adapter and a couple of bigger USB
>> thumb drives to install to, RAID 1 style, freeing up all your external
>> drive bays. At first, I didn't think that a thumb drive would hold
>> enough for the O/S, but in actual production use for a file server with
>> 14 TB of redundant storage, the OS actually uses less than 6 GB!
> USB thumb drives are really not that suitable for anything doing random
> writes, lots of small files, etc.
>
Agreed! In the case of a file store, there isn't a whole lot going on 
with the O/S drive, just the drives that the O/S is hosting. The 
original post recommended that /var/log be run off the big partition 
being hosted (on spinning disks) to minimize writes to the flash drives.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Install to internal USB?

[John R Pierce]

On 11/8/2013 12:57 PM, Lists wrote:
> Saw a trick today, wondering if anybody else had done/tried this? Assume
> you have a 1U rackmount with 4 front-accessed drive bays, and you want
> all four bays for a 4-disk RAID5 storage.
>
> The idea is to use an internal USB adapter and a couple of bigger USB
> thumb drives to install to, RAID 1 style, freeing up all your external
> drive bays. At first, I didn't think that a thumb drive would hold
> enough for the O/S, but in actual production use for a file server with
> 14 TB of redundant storage, the OS actually uses less than 6 GB!

USB thumb drives are really not that suitable for anything doing random 
writes, lots of small files, etc.



-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Install to internal USB?

[Keith Keller]

On 2013-11-08, Lists  wrote:
>
> The idea is to use an internal USB adapter and a couple of bigger USB 
> thumb drives to install to, RAID 1 style, freeing up all your external 
> drive bays. At first, I didn't think that a thumb drive would hold 
> enough for the O/S, but in actual production use for a file server with 
> 14 TB of redundant storage, the OS actually uses less than 6 GB!

Yeah, thumb drives have really gotten enormous over the years.

My concern about the above would be, if one drive fails, you have to
down the box, or at least slide the case out and open it, in order to
change it.  I would be slightly more inclined to do this with external
drives.

Question: does the controller backing the four hot-swap bays support
device carving?  You can take one RAID array and expose two volumes to
the OS, which appear as separate devices.  Both 3ware and MegaRAID cards
support this; I imagine Areca does too.  One downside is that you can't
replace the entire RAID5 on the fly, since it has your OS.

--keith

-- 
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Install to internal USB?

[Lists]

Saw a trick today, wondering if anybody else had done/tried this? Assume 
you have a 1U rackmount with 4 front-accessed drive bays, and you want 
all four bays for a 4-disk RAID5 storage.

The idea is to use an internal USB adapter and a couple of bigger USB 
thumb drives to install to, RAID 1 style, freeing up all your external 
drive bays. At first, I didn't think that a thumb drive would hold 
enough for the O/S, but in actual production use for a file server with 
14 TB of redundant storage, the OS actually uses less than 6 GB!

Here's the internal USB adapter specifically mentioned:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B007PODI1W

I'd be concerned about getting a higher quality drive than the $10 
givaways at Staples; Anybody here ever tried this?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Installing CentOS via USB thumbdrive

[Lists]

On 11/08/2013 10:04 AM, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> Has anyone successfully installed via USB?
> I remember reading some multi part instructions where the USB drive is 
> formatted with some special tools, often involving Windows, and various files 
> need to be copied to the USB drive.  But I was hoping we were passed that by 
> now.
> But then again, Dell firmware updates still want me to make a DOS bootable 
> floppy.  So, I'm usually not surprised when I hear something like this.   :)

I did an install from USB disk a while back. It mostly worked. The only 
thing I had issues with is that the USB disk occupied a slot and I had 
to tell grub which partition to boot from.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Installing CentOS via USB thumbdrive

[Joseph Spenner]

I've been poking at this for quite a while, and have never been able to get it 
to work.
I've found a couple links with some partial truths:
  
http://syslint.com/syslint/how-to-make-a-usb-boot-disk-for-centosrhel-from-iso-file/
  http://brakkee.org/site/2013/05/09/creating-a-usb-install-for-centos-6-4/

The first one talks about converting a standard iso to a 'hybrid' image, using: 
 'isohybrid'.
 But it then instructs the reader to make a vfat partition on the thumbdrive, 
and DD the image to that partition.  This seemed odd to me, since the image 
itself should have all that info.  I've used hybrid images before, such as 
Linux Mint, and was simply able to dd directly to the device itself, ie:  dd 
if=/path/to/hybrid.iso of=/dev/sdb   (where sdb is the thumbdrive).
 But, I went along with it, and it failed-- unable to find 'isolinux.bin'.
  I've read this error is due to old/incompatible firmware, but I've booted 
other thumbdrive hybrid-built images many times, and have never seen this 
except in CentOS installations.
  So, I tried doing a dd directly to the thumbdrive device, rather than the 
partition.

This actually looked like it was going to work.  I got to the initial installer 
page, and proceeded through the Language and Keyboard questions.   It then 
forgot where itself was, and asked me where the media for installation was.  I 
selected Hard Drive, and /dev/sda1 showed up as default.  I hit enter, and it 
continued further.
But then it again forgot where the media was, and couldn't find the 
installation media.


The second URL/instruction wouldn't boot at all.

Has anyone successfully installed via USB?
I remember reading some multi part instructions where the USB drive is 
formatted with some special tools, often involving Windows, and various files 
need to be copied to the USB drive.  But I was hoping we were passed that by 
now.
But then again, Dell firmware updates still want me to make a DOS bootable 
floppy.  So, I'm usually not surprised when I hear something like this.   :)

Thanks!

Regards,
Joseph Spenner



 
If life gives you lemons, keep them-- because hey.. free lemons.

"~heart~ Sticker"  fixer:  http://microflush.org/stuff/stickers/heartFix.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Wireless problems

[Krzysztof Szarlej]

Answer 1: Home router
Answer 2: Nothing should cut the signal, signal strength is very good as i
am close to the router (not 2 close however). Anyway on my windows (this pc
is dual boot) everything is fine...

I found that there is a

Nov  8 14:10:17 mlody NetworkManager[8817]:  (wlan0): device state
change: 8 -> 3 (reason 11)

the reason 11 is:

NM_DEVICE_STATE_REASON_SUPPLICANT_TIMEOUT

Any suggestions?? Regards




2013/11/8 

> Krzysztof Szarlej wrote:
> > Hi guys, I have a problem with my Centos 6.4.
> >
> > I am experiencing a Wireless Disconnects, some time ago I had them
> > constantly each 2-3minutes. After upgrading to new kernel (and other
> > software from "Software Update" I am still exepriencing disconnects but
> > every 10-15 minutes. It makes me angry because I am doing a lot of work
> > with ftp servers.
> 
> Question 1: what provides the wireless? A router? Is this at home or work?
> Question 2: if it's really that regular, are you sure that something is
>  not coming between you and the hotpoint to cut the signal?
>
>   mark
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Wireless problems

[m . roth]

Krzysztof Szarlej wrote:
> Hi guys, I have a problem with my Centos 6.4.
>
> I am experiencing a Wireless Disconnects, some time ago I had them
> constantly each 2-3minutes. After upgrading to new kernel (and other
> software from "Software Update" I am still exepriencing disconnects but
> every 10-15 minutes. It makes me angry because I am doing a lot of work
> with ftp servers.

Question 1: what provides the wireless? A router? Is this at home or work?
Question 2: if it's really that regular, are you sure that something is
 not coming between you and the hotpoint to cut the signal?

  mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] IBM Storwize V3700 storage - device names

[Tris Hoar]

On 07/11/2013 21:14, Todor Petkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have IBM Storwize V3700 storage, connected to 2 IBM x3550 M4 servers
> via fiber channel. The servers are with QLogic ISP2532-based 8Gb Fibre
> Channel to
> PCI Express HBA cards and run Centos 5.10
>
> When I export a volume to the servers, each of them sees the volume
> twice, i.e  /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc, with the same size.
>
> Previously I have installed many systems with IBM DS3500 series of
> storage and the servers see one disk per export. I am using the MPP
> drives from this package:
> http://support.netapp.com/NOW/public/apbu/oemcp/apbu_lic.cgi/public/apbu/oemcp/09.03.0C05.0652/rdac-LINUX-09.03.0C05.0652-source.tar.gz
>
> I came upon the IBM site, saying to configure multipath (I never did it
> for DS3500 series). When I did, a new device came, /dev/dm-7, but my
> goal is to have one /dev/sdX type of device and no device mapper. I read
> that Storwize support DMP RDAC, and DS support MPP RDAC, but does anyone
> else have experience with such setup and can give an advice/hint?
>
> Thanks in advance.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

I's been a while since I set this up, and this on on XIV, not v3700 
(which we also have but it only has VMware connected to it) but this is 
a RHEL 5.10 box, so is reasonably compatible.

This is, IMO, normal behaviour for a multipath device. For example on 
one of our boxes if I run:
[root@server ~]# multipath -ll
mpath0 (20017380011ea0c74) dm-2 IBM,2810XIV
[size=224G][features=1 queue_if_no_path][hwhandler=0][rw]
\_ round-robin 0 [prio=1][active]
  \_ 3:0:0:1 sdb 8:16  [active][ready]
  \_ 3:0:1:1 sdc 8:32  [active][ready]
  \_ 3:0:2:1 sdd 8:48  [active][ready]
  \_ 3:0:3:1 sde 8:64  [active][ready]
  \_ 3:0:4:1 sdf 8:80  [active][ready]
  \_ 3:0:5:1 sdg 8:96  [active][ready]
  \_ 4:0:0:1 sdh 8:112 [active][ready]
  \_ 4:0:1:1 sdi 8:128 [active][ready]
  \_ 4:0:2:1 sdj 8:144 [active][ready]
  \_ 4:0:3:1 sdk 8:160 [active][ready]
  \_ 4:0:4:1 sdl 8:176 [active][ready]
  \_ 4:0:5:1 sdm 8:192 [active][ready]

You can see there are 12 sdx devices, but that all maps to just 1 LUN.
With multipathd installed and running this all maps to a single volume 
under /dev/mpath/mpath0 which I then use LVM to manage:

   --- Physical volume ---
   PV Name   /dev/mpath/mpath0
   VG Name   vg_data
   PV Size   224.00 GB / not usable 4.00 MB
   Allocatable   yes (but full)
   PE Size (KByte)   4096
   Total PE  57343
   Free PE   0
   Allocated PE  57343
   PV UUID   GY4ekC-KuXE-LyW6-kiHB-F9g6-ivB2-BD01Ih

This all works fine and allows us to loose paths to the SAN with out 
disruption to the servers. There is no reason to be using /dev/sdx 
devices to control your underlying hardware, and is in fact coincided 
bad practice as there is no assurance that when the server next boots it 
will detect the hardware in the same order. You should really be using 
UUIDS or device labels to address your storage as that is immutable 
between boots.

Tris

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 
to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email 
in error please notify postmas...@bgfl.org

The views expressed within this email are those of the 
individual, and not necessarily those of the organisation
*

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Wireless problems

[Krzysztof Szarlej]

Hi guys, I have a problem with my Centos 6.4.

I am experiencing a Wireless Disconnects, some time ago I had them
constantly each 2-3minutes. After upgrading to new kernel (and other
software from "Software Update" I am still exepriencing disconnects but
every 10-15 minutes. It makes me angry because I am doing a lot of work
with ftp servers.

Card:
*Atheros Communications Inc. AR9285 Wireless Network Adapter (PCI-Express)
(rev 01)*

uname -r:
*2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.i686*

I Turned off ipv6 in */etc/sysctl.conf*

Here is Log: ( I divided it into 2 stages)

Nov  8 14:10:01 mlody kernel: cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world
regulatory domain
Nov  8 14:10:01 mlody NetworkManager[8817]:  (wlan0): supplicant
connection state:  completed -> disconnected
Nov  8 14:10:01 mlody kernel: cfg80211: World regulatory domain updated:
Nov  8 14:10:01 mlody kernel: cfg80211:   (start_freq - end_freq @
bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp)
Nov  8 14:10:01 mlody kernel: cfg80211:   (2402000 KHz - 2472000 KHz @
4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm)
Nov  8 14:10:01 mlody kernel: cfg80211:   (2457000 KHz - 2482000 KHz @
2 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm)
Nov  8 14:10:01 mlody kernel: cfg80211:   (2474000 KHz - 2494000 KHz @
2 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm)
Nov  8 14:10:01 mlody kernel: cfg80211:   (517 KHz - 525 KHz @
4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm)
Nov  8 14:10:01 mlody kernel: cfg80211:   (5735000 KHz - 5835000 KHz @
4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm)
---
Nov  8 14:10:01 mlody NetworkManager[8817]:  (wlan0): supplicant
connection state:  disconnected -> scanning
Nov  8 14:10:17 mlody NetworkManager[8817]:  (wlan0): device state
change: 8 -> 3 (reason 11)
Nov  8 14:10:17 mlody NetworkManager[8817]:  (wlan0): deactivating
device (reason: 11).
Nov  8 14:10:17 mlody NetworkManager[8817]:  (wlan0): canceled DHCP
transaction, DHCP client pid 16791
Nov  8 14:10:17 mlody NetworkManager[8817]:  Couldn't disconnect
supplicant interface: Method "Disconnect" with signature "" on interface
"fi.epitest.hostap.WPASupplicant.Interface" doesn't exist#012.
Nov  8 14:10:17 mlody NetworkManager[8817]:  Auto-activating
connection 'Auto Bulgarski Poscikk'.
Nov  8 14:10:17 mlody NetworkManager[8817]:  Activation (wlan0)
starting connection 'Auto Bulgarski Poscikk'
...


first block: This appears and after several seconds then second block
appear and the wifi is disconnected, right after it disconnects it tries to
reconnect.


*Regards!*
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 105, Issue 6

[centos-announce-request]

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CEBA-2013:1506  CentOS 6 udev Update (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 15:26:14 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:1506  CentOS 6 udev Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20131107152614.ga51...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1506 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1506.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
b037d6c2c622f7a34fa0765e4bfd64cd1859207946dbb2c81b31b1c023474a3c  
libgudev1-147-2.46.el6_4.2.i686.rpm
6188b3eb42bf874d8a246e06511bfa799caf7b1cf3ea61daa8512a564dfa91df  
libgudev1-devel-147-2.46.el6_4.2.i686.rpm
6918e179150b87608ca4afdfaca40cb81d252d82d4d5782a842ea16b2f922525  
libudev-147-2.46.el6_4.2.i686.rpm
b543f81d1516650b23013a477bbb2b4c88e87f7126fda4476acae8ce84ebae0e  
libudev-devel-147-2.46.el6_4.2.i686.rpm
aece91f7bda8f95d7596555acbc7b7d629ca8463cf3cb0a70b3a9159537bc4a8  
udev-147-2.46.el6_4.2.i686.rpm

x86_64:
b037d6c2c622f7a34fa0765e4bfd64cd1859207946dbb2c81b31b1c023474a3c  
libgudev1-147-2.46.el6_4.2.i686.rpm
6a537fc17943a2e2bfa28404545b02aa4e87fc4d383c76be9c493bda75f32f8c  
libgudev1-147-2.46.el6_4.2.x86_64.rpm
6188b3eb42bf874d8a246e06511bfa799caf7b1cf3ea61daa8512a564dfa91df  
libgudev1-devel-147-2.46.el6_4.2.i686.rpm
343a8ca5cc5f4230119d68610b65f1994b5f2a79b58930fdb42bd9911c8a75e8  
libgudev1-devel-147-2.46.el6_4.2.x86_64.rpm
6918e179150b87608ca4afdfaca40cb81d252d82d4d5782a842ea16b2f922525  
libudev-147-2.46.el6_4.2.i686.rpm
f6775e18c55f77726482388648ce5acb30084399ab9f1a84392ed728b2208137  
libudev-147-2.46.el6_4.2.x86_64.rpm
b543f81d1516650b23013a477bbb2b4c88e87f7126fda4476acae8ce84ebae0e  
libudev-devel-147-2.46.el6_4.2.i686.rpm
cc89b8410bbc8061c0c66d320793dbe6be8f0bc85759099513663c5ed066bda3  
libudev-devel-147-2.46.el6_4.2.x86_64.rpm
5d95c1d1a19cf7e6b3b7be132a95c6a780047bb8b3b216e00012759c522502ec  
udev-147-2.46.el6_4.2.x86_64.rpm

Source:
a85a5c251c89d8ac6810a7316d0da6980d4cc864b0cad57a59d0ee042b6c4fcf  
udev-147-2.46.el6_4.2.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 105, Issue 6
***
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] chipsets etc to avoid for CentOS 6.x

[Arun Khan]

On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Arun Khan  wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Devin Reade  wrote:
>>
>> I've typically stuck to Intel CPUs, and prefer Gigabyte or Intel
>> motherboards.  I'd prefer to minimize the likelihood of non-working
>> or marginally-working hardware.
>
> Gigabyte does list Linux for their boards, albeit as caveat -- an example 
> here:
> 
>
> I would suggest select a board that has been in the market for about 6
> months.   Look up the chipset on the board and verify support for it
> in the Linux kernel.   Also, besides costing a little less it will
> most likely work with the latest incarnate of the OS.
>

I had meant to add following info in my earlier response -

Supermicro makes desktop/workstation boards based on i3/i5/i7 CPUs and
compatible chip set:


OS compatibility for board chip set ==>


HTH
-- 
Arun Khan
Sent from my non-iphone/non-android device
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos