date:20150827



On 08/27/15 07:11, Gary Stainburn wrote: Bad news Guys, they've just moved
the emails to somewhere else and have
 started again:

 From: Caylian Curtis caylian@enjoylovef**k.com


not true. she has been at that site for a while.

i received 1st email from her and Julie Anna just after i posted to this
thread.

i will say emailing Julie Anna was more fun than with Caylian.

Julie Anna is much better looking than Caylian, btw. :-b


-- 
peace out.

If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes...
 ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it!
-+-
in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6

tc,hago.

g
.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread John R Pierce


On 8/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote:

we had a vary serious and meaningful intercourse that only someone of
a high amount of education and intelligence would have been able to
maintain.



PLEASE tell me this whole post is tongue-in-cheek.


nayways, none of this has ANYthing to do with CENTOS and really, is 
totally off topic for this list.


--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 Bind and DLZ support

2015-08-27 Thread James A. Peltier

- Original Message -
| Is DLZ support enabled in the Centos 7 bind?
| 
| building a Samba/sernet AD, and this looks to be the best way to handle
| the DNS needs of the AD.
| 
| thanks.
| 
| Also any web tools for managing a mysql (mariaDB?) DLZ backend? Web, as
| my AD will not have a GUI; nor should I be doing this on the AD directly.

In our case, we just define the zones that the AD servers should be allowed to 
update, such as the _msdcs, _sites, _tcp and _udp zones, and assign the BIND 
servers as slaves.  It seems to work but YMMV

-- 
James A. Peltier
IT Services - Research Computing Group
Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus
Phone   : 604-365-6432
Fax : 778-782-3045
E-Mail  : jpelt...@sfu.ca
Website : http://www.sfu.ca/itservices
Twitter : @sfu_rcg
Powering Engagement Through Technology
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Alice Wonder




On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote:



On 08/27/15 09:31, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:



*sigh*
And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat,
47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way


.
i seriously doubt it.

several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy.




Whoever he is, is using both valid SPF records and DKIM signatures, 
they've figured out using those reduces spam score on some systems.


Most spam seems to come from a small group of spammers that operate out 
of South Florida, why there I don't know.


But they aren't the under-achieving geek many imagine them to be. It's 
serious business for them. Dirty business but serious.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] a peculiar LVM failure on CentOS 6 run as a VMware 5.5 guest

2015-08-27 Thread Boris Epstein

Hello Leonard,

Thank you very much for your response.

While it most likely is related the problem description provided at the
link seems a bit vague, and tips on how to resolve the issue seem to be
even more so.

I have done some research and in the process stumbled upon this:

http://linoxide.com/linux-how-to/fixing-broken-initrd-image-linux/

The discussion there circled around using mkinitrd (as opposed to dracut
which in my case did not help).

So, while mounted off a Centos DVD ISO I chroot'ed into the root of my
installation on the disk and then ran the following:

mkinitrd /boot/initramfs-2.6.32-573.3.1.el6.x86_64.img 2.6.32-573.3.1

I saved the original content of
/boot/initramfs-2.6.32-573.3.1.el6.x86_64.img too. So now the problem is
resolved, and it is reproducible - it boots with the one I generated but
not with the original one which was the one that got there as a result of
an update.

I have not been able to see what the issue was with the original image.

Cheers,

Boris.

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
leon...@den.ottolander.nl wrote:

Hello Boris,

On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 15:59 -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
We have a Centos 6 VM (64 bit) running on a VMware vSphere 5.5 server. It
was running just fine until one day I decided to reboot it and it just
would not boot up. Effectively, dracut failed to initialize the LVM, much
like under the scenario described here:

http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/207593/how-to-make-lvms-at-available-boot-kernel-panic-dracut-cannot-find-logical-vo#

Perhaps this is related?
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1615.html

Prior to this update, using the lvm utility when the persistent cache
file was
outdated caused devices that were stored in the persistent cache to
unintentionally bypass logical volume manager (LVM) filters set in the
LVM
configuration. As a consequence, Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization hosts
in some
cases failed to start with an outdated cache file. This update fixes
LVM's
internal cache handling so that the filters are applied properly, and
the
described problem no longer occurs. (BZ#1248032)

Try updating LVM to the latest version and see if it helps.

Regards,
Leonard.

--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Alice Wonder




On 08/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote:



On 08/27/15 12:12, Alice Wonder wrote:

On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote:

On 08/27/15 09:31, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:



*sigh*
And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat,
47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way


.
i seriously doubt it.

several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy.


Whoever he is, is using both valid SPF records and DKIM signatures,
they've figured out using those reduces spam score on some systems.


.
as i wrote;

several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy.

the responses were too quick. no fat 47 yog could have enough photos
to respond to request that i made.


Okay, um, I have done some work related to that industry - never for a 
company that spams.


For about $10 you can buy photosets, usually of Eastern European models, 
with hundreds of photos in different settings.


So no, the photos are most certainly not an indication of who you were 
communicating with.


But enough off-topic. Those kind of e-mails should only be sent to 
people who specifically opt-in to receive them. That's the bottom line.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user



On 08/27/15 13:00, Alice Wonder wrote:
 
 
 On 08/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote:


 On 08/27/15 12:12, Alice Wonder wrote:
 On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote:
 On 08/27/15 09:31, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 

 *sigh*
 And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat,
 47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way

 .
 i seriously doubt it.

 several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy.

 Whoever he is, is using both valid SPF records and DKIM signatures,
 they've figured out using those reduces spam score on some systems.

 .
 as i wrote;

 several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy.

 the responses were too quick. no fat 47 yog could have enough photos
 to respond to request that i made.
 

 Okay, um, I have done some work related to that industry - never for a 
 company that spams.

.
i will be polite and not ask what company. :-)

 For about $10 you can buy photosets, usually of Eastern European models, 
 with hundreds of photos in different settings.

.
yes, i have seen them. but i believe, why should i pay for what i can see
for free and live.

 So no, the photos are most certainly not an indication of who you were 
 communicating with.

.
very true.

 But enough off-topic. Those kind of e-mails should only be sent to 
 people who specifically opt-in to receive them. That's the bottom line.

.
i agree.

one should always have choice of what pleasure one receives, or gives.
tho the mystery of yet to come can make pleasures greater.

also, i do like to see the change in your attitude. a good indication
of maturity.

i still believe moz gen would be a good place to continue because of the
additional input.


-- 
peace out.

If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes...
 ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it!
-+-
in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6

tc,hago.

g
.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 Bind and DLZ support

2015-08-27 Thread Robert Moskowitz




On 08/27/2015 12:49 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:

- Original Message -
| Is DLZ support enabled in the Centos 7 bind?
|
| building a Samba/sernet AD, and this looks to be the best way to handle
| the DNS needs of the AD.
|
| thanks.
|
| Also any web tools for managing a mysql (mariaDB?) DLZ backend? Web, as
| my AD will not have a GUI; nor should I be doing this on the AD directly.

In our case, we just define the zones that the AD servers should be allowed to 
update, such as the _msdcs, _sites, _tcp and _udp zones, and assign the BIND 
servers as slaves.  It seems to work but YMMV


So what are you running for DNS on the AD?


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user



On 08/27/15 12:12, Alice Wonder wrote:
 On 08/27/2015 08:58 AM, g wrote:
 On 08/27/15 09:31, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 

 *sigh*
 And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat,
 47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way

 .
 i seriously doubt it.

 several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy.

 Whoever he is, is using both valid SPF records and DKIM signatures, 
 they've figured out using those reduces spam score on some systems.

.
as i wrote;

   several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy.

the responses were too quick. no fat 47 yog could have enough photos
to respond to request that i made. and i made them to see if who i was
writing to was in fact live and real.

Julie Anna showed a very goodly attitude and even a bit of maturity
about her. very much unlike yours. ;-)

 Most spam seems to come from a small group of spammers that operate out 
 of South Florida, why there I don't know.

.
i would not call her a spammer in the full sense of the meaning of
spamming. i say this because if i had not responded, i seriously doubt
that i would have received any more emails.

we had a vary serious and meaningful intercourse that only someone of
a high amount of education and intelligence would have been able to
maintain.

in fact, i found it to be an enjoyable time, until you started your
griping about it.

as for some of the pix that she sent, yes, she bared her breast, but
so what, i have seen bare breast from my childhood years and i do still
admire and enjoy seeing them.

in fact, the city where i live had a 'topless fest' at the local city
park. it was a most enjoyable event. all had a good time, no one got
raped, molested, or arrested. at least i was not aware that there were
of or see any.

i did see many beautiful women with beautiful breast and they had every
right to be proud of them.

to shun and condemn children knowledge of human anatomy and not give
them a proper education of anatomy and sex is tending to point them
into a life of perversion, molestation and homosexuality.

when my daughter was was old enough to understand, comprehend, and reason,
i started explaining life, anatomy, sexual differences, and why men and
women are different. i started with basics and as she grew older and
could understand more, i explained more to her. the results of all of
it were well worth it because she grew up to be a well adjusted normal
woman.

why did i do it? simple.

it was written in several of the child psychology books that i have read.
basically, teach them young and not have to worry about them when they are
older.

this is getting very off topic. if you would like to continue this with
opinions of others, join the mozilla general news. that is unless you are
afraid to because i am sure that there many subscribers of the group that
will agree with me.


-- 
peace out.

If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes...
 ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it!
-+-
in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6

tc,hago.

g
.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user

g wrote:
 On 08/27/15 07:11, Gary Stainburn wrote: Bad news Guys, they've just
 moved
 the emails to somewhere else and have started again:
 
 From: Caylian Curtis caylian@enjoylovef**k.com
 
 not true. she has been at that site for a while.

 i received 1st email from her and Julie Anna just after i posted to this
 thread.

 i will say emailing Julie Anna was more fun than with Caylian.

 Julie Anna is much better looking than Caylian, btw. :-b

*sigh*
And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat, 47 yr
old guy living in a basement and making money this way

  mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Always Learning


On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 10:35 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:

 Me too: I started receiving them from different IP (with much longer
 delay, so they do add improvements to their setup). This IP, has neither
 DNS A record nor DNS PTR record, but has DNS MX record. One can use these
 (have your MX stop talking to anything having broken DNS records).

Exim is available from EPEL.

In Exim:

(1) I set one indicator if the host name does not fully resolve (IP to
name to IP)

(2) I set another indicator if there is something wrong with the
HELO/EHLO name or the name does not resolve to the sender's IP address

(3) I set a third indicator if the SMTP sender = SMTP recipient; or
 the SMTP recipient is an email address disused because of spam; or
 the SMTP recipient's host is *not* one of ours

(4) If all 3 indicators set, then:-

* then the email attempt is rejected before the email body (DATA) is
received

* a PHP sub-routine is called which creates a fully descriptive internal
email and SUDO is invoked to add the IP address to the firewall's
monthly blocking list.

Otherwise if the sender = recipient or the recipient is 'wrong' the
connection is rejected *before* the message body is accepted from the
sender.

-

Meanwhile, every incoming email's sender's host is checked against a
file containing banned senders' host names and the occasional IP
address.

Fight spam by *not* being a passive victim.

Regards,

Paul.
 



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user

Gary Stainburn wrote:
 Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have
 started again:
snip

A suggestion: there should be a way to filter using *domain* AND mailhost;
that is, if emails come from a domain, and through one mailhost, then
block the domain. If many domains, and the same mailhost, only then block
the mailhost.

I've been thinking about this since yesterday, when I got back from
vacation, to hear from my manager that he had to screw with mailman,
because we were getting a lot of emails from elsewhere, subscribing to one
or more of our lists... and having the target be one of three gmail
accounts - a DDoS against them (and we assume that they're doing it to a
lot of other places).

Anyway, given the number of times I've been blocked by nixspam (which I
found is run by IX, a German IT mag, and that they don't answer emails to
*them*, either), I've been trying to think of a *reasonable* way to block
that doesn't do collective punishment to the many domains of a huge
hosting provider, and that's my best thought so far.

 mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Valeri Galtsev

On Thu, August 27, 2015 9:29 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 Gary Stainburn wrote:
 Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have
started again:
 snip

 A suggestion: there should be a way to filter using *domain* AND
mailhost;
 that is, if emails come from a domain, and through one mailhost, then
block the domain. If many domains, and the same mailhost, only then
block
 the mailhost.

Me too: I started receiving them from different IP (with much longer
delay, so they do add improvements to their setup). This IP, has neither
DNS A record nor DNS PTR record, but has DNS MX record. One can use these
(have your MX stop talking to anything having broken DNS records). I
however am tempted to block digitalocean's whole blocks of IP addresses
again (after all, I bet I've seen the whole collection of these images
already ;-). This is not trouble with their customer IMHO. This is trouble
with themselves: how come the IP that is not registered in DNS can have
DNS MX record, and can be accessed by somebody?!


 I've been thinking about this since yesterday, when I got back from
vacation, to hear from my manager that he had to screw with mailman,
because we were getting a lot of emails from elsewhere, subscribing to
one
 or more of our lists... and having the target be one of three gmail
accounts - a DDoS against them (and we assume that they're doing it to a
lot of other places).

That is another side of you being famous ;-) We are not, so no one is
trying to abuse somebody else by means of subscribing them to our mail
lists (that said, it would be our list admins who would be abused as all
lists - based on mailman - require approval and confirmation, the last
comes after approval if I remember correctly).

Thanks.
Valeri


 Anyway, given the number of times I've been blocked by nixspam (which I
found is run by IX, a German IT mag, and that they don't answer emails
to
 *them*, either), I've been trying to think of a *reasonable* way to
block
 that doesn't do collective punishment to the many domains of a huge
hosting provider, and that's my best thought so far.

  mark

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247





___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user



On 08/27/15 09:31, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:


 *sigh*
 And they're probably sent by a script running on the PC of a fat,
 47 yr old guy living in a basement and making money this way

.
i seriously doubt it.

several of the responses could not have been from a fat 47 yo guy.


-- 
peace out.

If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes...
 ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it!
-+-
in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6

tc,hago.

g
.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Robert Wolfe

Now see, I run a spam filter (run on CentOS, by the way *smiles*) and I have 
several friends' domain emails running through it.  It has a pretty good filter 
rate, too for being all open source.

-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of 
m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:30 AM
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] please block user

Gary Stainburn wrote:
 Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and 
 have started again:
snip

A suggestion: there should be a way to filter using *domain* AND mailhost; that 
is, if emails come from a domain, and through one mailhost, then block the 
domain. If many domains, and the same mailhost, only then block the mailhost.

I've been thinking about this since yesterday, when I got back from vacation, 
to hear from my manager that he had to screw with mailman, because we were 
getting a lot of emails from elsewhere, subscribing to one or more of our 
lists... and having the target be one of three gmail accounts - a DDoS against 
them (and we assume that they're doing it to a lot of other places).

Anyway, given the number of times I've been blocked by nixspam (which I found 
is run by IX, a German IT mag, and that they don't answer emails to *them*, 
either), I've been trying to think of a *reasonable* way to block that doesn't 
do collective punishment to the many domains of a huge hosting provider, and 
that's my best thought so far.

 mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user



On 08/27/15 13:07, John R Pierce wrote:
 On 8/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote:
 we had a vary serious and meaningful intercourse that only someone of
 a high amount of education and intelligence would have been able to
 maintain.

 PLEASE tell me this whole post is tongue-in-cheek.

.
that is one place for a tongue. ;-)

look at the meaning of the word.

  https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/intercourse

it does not only mean coitus.

 nayways, none of this has ANYthing to do with CENTOS and really, is 
 totally off topic for this list.

.
true. and i thank moderate for his understanding.

i have invited Alice to continue this on moz gen. how about you?


-- 
peace out.

If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes...
 ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it!
-+-
in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6

tc,hago.

g
.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user



On 08/27/15 13:32, John R Pierce wrote:
 On 8/27/2015 11:30 AM, g wrote:
 i have invited Alice to continue this on moz gen. how about you?

 I am neither on that list nor have any interest in joining it.

.
fine. end of discussion.

have a great day.

mine has been most enjoyable so far.


-- 
peace out.

If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes...
 ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it!
-+-
in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6

tc,hago.

g
.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] C7, nfs issue on restart

Hi, folks,

   We're having an issue on a server reboot after update; nfs doesn't come
up. systemctl tells us it's enabled, dead. We restart the service with
systemctl, and there's no problem at all.

   I was just looking in the logfiles from the reboot (grep -i nfs
/var/log/messages), and the *only* odd thing I see is this:
Aug 25 08:05:09 servername systemd: Cannot add dependency job for unit
nfs.target, ignoring: Unit nfs.target failed to load: No such file or
directory.

   Also, and I think I may have posted this a month or so ago, is that
ll /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/nfs.target
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 34 Sep 25  2014
/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/nfs.target -
/usr/lib/systemd/system/nfs.target

is a bad link - there *is* no /usr/lib/systemd/system/nfs.target.

   Any clues? I suspect some kind of timing issue/race condition, but

   mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] centos 6 - changing resolv.conf by hand gets overwritten by rebooting

2015-08-27 Thread George

given machine with C6 x86_64 (seen on C 6.6 but also before and probably 
still present on C6.7) only 1 interface, there is dhcp on this network 
(for kickstarting) but the machines have static ip's, and NO 
networkmanager installed


contents of resolv.conf
search some.domain.here
nameserver x.x.x.x #dns1
nameserver y.y.y.y #dns2

change resolv.conf to:
search some.newdomain.here
nameserver z.z.z.z #dns3
nameserver a.a.a.a #dns4

reboot machine and the contents of resolv.conf is again:
search some.domain.here
nameserver x.x.x.x #dns1
nameserver y.y.y.y #dns2

change it again to:
search some.newdomain.here
nameserver z.z.z.z #dns3
nameserver a.a.a.a #dns4
reboot again
now it stick to the last update.

Already tried to set /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 
NM_controlled=no

with no result
other suggestions around the internet suggest also to set in
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
usepeerdns=no
have not tried this but should check if this fixes stuff.

Question: can someone explain me WHY this would help if it does and if 
this a valid entry in /etc/sysconfig/network ?
since I don't want to go over all my machines (a couple thousand) 
figuring out how many interfaces they have and what their names are to 
reconfigure that for each interface (some even suggest this should be 
done for lo too).


See also dozens of questions like that using google:
https://www.google.com/search?q=centos+6+overwrites+resolv.conf+reboot

G.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 - changing resolv.conf by hand gets overwritten by rebooting

2015-08-27 Thread Pete Geenhuizen


I think that you want to create /etc/dhclient-enter-hooks
with this, for more info do a search on dhclient-enter-hooks

# vi /etc/dhclient-enter-hooks
make_resolv_conf(){
:
}

Pete

On 08/27/15 15:36, George wrote:
given machine with C6 x86_64 (seen on C 6.6 but also before and 
probably still present on C6.7) only 1 interface, there is dhcp on 
this network (for kickstarting) but the machines have static ip's, and 
NO networkmanager installed


contents of resolv.conf
search some.domain.here
nameserver x.x.x.x #dns1
nameserver y.y.y.y #dns2

change resolv.conf to:
search some.newdomain.here
nameserver z.z.z.z #dns3
nameserver a.a.a.a #dns4

reboot machine and the contents of resolv.conf is again:
search some.domain.here
nameserver x.x.x.x #dns1
nameserver y.y.y.y #dns2

change it again to:
search some.newdomain.here
nameserver z.z.z.z #dns3
nameserver a.a.a.a #dns4
reboot again
now it stick to the last update.

Already tried to set /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 
NM_controlled=no

with no result
other suggestions around the internet suggest also to set in
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
usepeerdns=no
have not tried this but should check if this fixes stuff.

Question: can someone explain me WHY this would help if it does and if 
this a valid entry in /etc/sysconfig/network ?
since I don't want to go over all my machines (a couple thousand) 
figuring out how many interfaces they have and what their names are to 
reconfigure that for each interface (some even suggest this should be 
done for lo too).


See also dozens of questions like that using google:
https://www.google.com/search?q=centos+6+overwrites+resolv.conf+reboot

G.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



--
If money can fix it, it's not a problem.
 -- Click and Clack the Tappet brothers

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread John R Pierce


On 8/27/2015 11:30 AM, g wrote:

i have invited Alice to continue this on moz gen. how about you?


I am neither on that list nor have any interest in joining it.



--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user - OT, very

g wrote:
 On 08/27/15 13:07, John R Pierce wrote:
 On 8/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote:
 we had a vary serious and meaningful intercourse that only someone of
 a high amount of education and intelligence would have been able to
 maintain.

 PLEASE tell me this whole post is tongue-in-cheek.
 that is one place for a tongue. ;-)

 look at the meaning of the word.

   https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/intercourse

 it does not only mean coitus.

 nayways, none of this has ANYthing to do with CENTOS and really, is
 totally off topic for this list.

 .
 true. and i thank moderate for his understanding.

 i have invited Alice to continue this on moz gen. how about you?

PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS EMAIL, g, AND PLEASE TAKE IT OFFLIST. This
isn't even a discussion of Poettering and systemd, this is just *not* the
place for this kind of conversation.

I will note that people far more on topic have been banned, temporarily or
permanently, including me, for things deemed inappropriate.

Besides we all have other venues for such conversations.

Just stop. Resist the temptation to get in the last word.

mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] C7 bind-sdb

2015-08-27 Thread Robert Moskowitz


This seems to be just a stub with 3 READMEs?

# locate bind-sdb
/usr/share/doc/bind-sdb-9.9.4
/usr/share/doc/bind-sdb-9.9.4/INSTALL.ldap
/usr/share/doc/bind-sdb-9.9.4/README.ldap
/usr/share/doc/bind-sdb-9.9.4/README.sdb_pgsql

Unless it is putting files elsewhere.

These readmes are dated long ago.  What is really needed and where is 
any good documentation for using this?


thanks

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] C6 HP lt4112 Gobi 4G Module

2015-08-27 Thread Patrick Bervoets


Anyone got an HP lt4112 Gobi 4G Module working in C6?
Care to give me some pointers about how/where to begin?

Thanks
Patrick

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 Bind and DLZ support

2015-08-27 Thread James A. Peltier



- Original Message -
| 
| 
| On 08/27/2015 12:49 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
|  - Original Message -
|  | Is DLZ support enabled in the Centos 7 bind?
|  |
|  | building a Samba/sernet AD, and this looks to be the best way to handle
|  | the DNS needs of the AD.
|  |
|  | thanks.
|  |
|  | Also any web tools for managing a mysql (mariaDB?) DLZ backend? Web, as
|  | my AD will not have a GUI; nor should I be doing this on the AD directly.
| 
|  In our case, we just define the zones that the AD servers should be allowed
|  to update, such as the _msdcs, _sites, _tcp and _udp zones, and assign the
|  BIND servers as slaves.  It seems to work but YMMV
| 
| So what are you running for DNS on the AD?

We allow Windows to run it's own AD Services for those zones and we don't 
publish them anywhere.

-- 
James A. Peltier
IT Services - Research Computing Group
Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus
Phone   : 604-365-6432
Fax : 778-782-3045
E-Mail  : jpelt...@sfu.ca
Website : http://www.sfu.ca/itservices
Twitter : @sfu_rcg
Powering Engagement Through Technology
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1693 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1693 Critical

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1693.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
ccd6daae6b5970ffd6d52ea9ef5b7fe86f7fe70433769e107da8e6e120f5cdda  
firefox-38.2.1-1.el7.centos.i686.rpm
8f0427d72b51874513dcff75cea91a9ad9c6df842274fa10962599793f07cb0e  
firefox-38.2.1-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm

Source:
39557ff01ea4da417e94adec1aa984713f4228164e660abec3fbb8357cff126d  
firefox-38.2.1-1.el7.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1682 Important CentOS 6 thunderbird Security Update


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1682 Important

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1682.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
212a3fb8ffd55e5b884a0d3d4a93b9fa329e42ec0d3da2697cd07f4164cab75d  
thunderbird-38.2.0-4.el6.centos.i686.rpm

x86_64:
2f599516b2700248194b1b0349de15698e6d5834417c78e4d9de1541033bca97  
thunderbird-38.2.0-4.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm

Source:
02c890e4584b486f07a69663e905d4658aa623f1bd38f8ff107707324a06962f  
thunderbird-38.2.0-4.el6.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1682 Important CentOS 5 thunderbird Security Update


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1682 Important

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1682.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
4a3c17746a0f6eb4538da53dedb6ce365d7e26b3922ca2764ad95cb6552985be  
thunderbird-38.2.0-4.el5.centos.i386.rpm

x86_64:
085dda14f0c68b842c7b691e9ae8797cab53e0d4b9f21d6b739b023f53181e2d  
thunderbird-38.2.0-4.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm

Source:
caa0713b07db9133ad60279eebf11190f87a1113c9142276756f8cbbe8e1cd50  
thunderbird-38.2.0-4.el5.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:1690 CentOS 7 kross-interpreters FASTTRACK BugFix Update


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1690 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1690.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
bff85d28d1892ca118dbd646a6f8c8b6e5bf954c282f8bcd424ce55c33cad0bd  
kross-interpreters-4.10.5-8.el7.x86_64.rpm
0dccd9630de7c99e87a7ed2b8e1a8bccfe2c34542fc79c4039a8e46db7016e1f  
kross-python-4.10.5-8.el7.x86_64.rpm
688aa654e71c511661bfefe293930102d1080373c8f10f1a6f0756bf6b55d2b6  
kross-ruby-4.10.5-8.el7.x86_64.rpm

Source:
490537dc16654bc6615642fe1694036e8782092789392d8d359529463585916f  
kross-interpreters-4.10.5-8.el7.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

[CentOS] virt-manager with dhcpd running on same machine

2015-08-27 Thread Jerry Geis

If I have dhcpd running on my machine,
and I wish to run virt-manager on the same machine
How do I do that - its telling me an error for starting the network
and the error is that DHCPD is already running - port in use.

Thanks,

Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1682 Important CentOS 7 thunderbird Security Update


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1682 Important

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1682.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
492a01e64a18f0d1800361dfd73d9678a07ce1c1eb75908e1c2c6a77dec9bfd8  
thunderbird-38.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm

Source:
2a4b617361ac4ba011498b67672a799e315d1db60db9804a63af67efbe454380  
thunderbird-38.2.0-1.el7.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

Re: [CentOS] virt-manager with dhcpd running on same machine

2015-08-27 Thread Gordon Messmer


On 08/27/2015 01:43 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:

If I have dhcpd running on my machine,
and I wish to run virt-manager on the same machine
How do I do that - its telling me an error for starting the network
and the error is that DHCPD is already running - port in use.


I'm mostly sure that if you want to run dhcpd, you just need to turn off 
the default network and use bridged networking instead.


https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Virtualization/sect-Virtualization-Network_Configuration-Bridged_networking_with_libvirt.html
(Hasn't really changed)

Under virt-manager, connect to the local host, then right-click on the 
local host and open Details.  Switch to the Virtual Networks tab, and 
uncheck the Autostart: On Boot option.


Guests will get dhcp from the bridged network, and will be on the same 
broadcast domain as the KVM host.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] apache mysterious 404 error

2015-08-27 Thread Rodrigo Maia

Hi apache on GNU/Linux  is case-sensitive samples:


/var/www/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg

on  browser :


(index):1 GET
http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/altImg.png

try :


(index):1 GET
http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png
http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/altImg.png



2015-08-27 19:18 GMT-03:00 Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com:

 Hey guys,

  Just have a question about apache. Hoping to get an opinion on this.

  I've just setup a site under apache 2.4.

  And made sure that the document root setup in the vhost for the site I'm
 serving has permissions for the apache user. Yet some of the files are
 throwing a 404 error in a browser even tho they are clearly present and
 accounted for on the file system.

 For example, I'm getting this error:

 (index):1 GET
 http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/altImg.png
 404 (*Not Found)

 (index):1 GET
 http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg
 404* (Not Found)

 (index):1 GET
 http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg
 404* (Not Found)

 (index):1 GET
 http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg
 404* (Not Found)
 And yet as I mentioned all those files are definitely there on the file
 system:

 [root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# ls -l
 /var/www/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png
 /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg
 /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg
 /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg

 -rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon128 Aug 27 12:22
 /var/www/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png

 -rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 260983 Jul 16 14:03
 /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg

 -rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 126628 Jul 16 14:00
 /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg

 -rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 222568 Jul 16 13:56
 /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg

 And all those files have the correct ownership for apache:

 [root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# egrep -i user|group conf/httpd.conf |
 egrep -i -v -e '#' -e log -e module

 User daemon

 Group daemon

 All the files are owned by daemon:daemon!! So why on earth are these files
 giving a 404?

 This is my virtual host for the site:


 VirtualHost *

 ServerAdmin timothy.dun...@mycomany.com

 DocumentRoot /var/www/mycomanystore

 ServerName stage.theshopatmycomanystudios.com

 ServerAlias 173.213.219.48

 ErrorLog logs/store_error_log

 LogFormat %h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b common

 CustomLog logs/store_access_log common

 Directory /var/www/mycomanystore

   DirectoryIndex index.html

   AddHandler cgi-script .cgi

   Options -Indexes +FollowSymLinks +ExecCGI +Includes

   AllowOverride All

   Require all granted

 /Directory

 ExpiresActive On

 ExpiresDefault access plus 30 minute

 RewriteEngine On

 RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^TRACE

 RewriteRule .* - [F]

 /VirtualHost

 Thanks

 Tim


 --
 GPG me!!

 gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] apache mysterious 404 error

2015-08-27 Thread Tim Dunphy

Hey guys,

 Just have a question about apache. Hoping to get an opinion on this.

 I've just setup a site under apache 2.4.

 And made sure that the document root setup in the vhost for the site I'm
serving has permissions for the apache user. Yet some of the files are
throwing a 404 error in a browser even tho they are clearly present and
accounted for on the file system.

For example, I'm getting this error:

(index):1 GET 
http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/altImg.png
404 (*Not Found)

(index):1 GET 
http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg
404* (Not Found)

(index):1 GET 
http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg
404* (Not Found)

(index):1 GET 
http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg
404* (Not Found)
And yet as I mentioned all those files are definitely there on the file
system:

[root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# ls -l
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon128 Aug 27 12:22
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 260983 Jul 16 14:03
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 126628 Jul 16 14:00
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 222568 Jul 16 13:56
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg

And all those files have the correct ownership for apache:

[root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# egrep -i user|group conf/httpd.conf |
egrep -i -v -e '#' -e log -e module

User daemon

Group daemon

All the files are owned by daemon:daemon!! So why on earth are these files
giving a 404?

This is my virtual host for the site:


VirtualHost *

ServerAdmin timothy.dun...@mycomany.com

DocumentRoot /var/www/mycomanystore

ServerName stage.theshopatmycomanystudios.com

ServerAlias 173.213.219.48

ErrorLog logs/store_error_log

LogFormat %h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b common

CustomLog logs/store_access_log common

Directory /var/www/mycomanystore

  DirectoryIndex index.html

  AddHandler cgi-script .cgi

  Options -Indexes +FollowSymLinks +ExecCGI +Includes

  AllowOverride All

  Require all granted

/Directory

ExpiresActive On

ExpiresDefault access plus 30 minute

RewriteEngine On

RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^TRACE

RewriteRule .* - [F]

/VirtualHost

Thanks

Tim


-- 
GPG me!!

gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Nataraj

On 08/27/2015 07:29 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 Gary Stainburn wrote:
 Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have
 started again:
 snip

 A suggestion: there should be a way to filter using *domain* AND mailhost;
 that is, if emails come from a domain, and through one mailhost, then
 block the domain. If many domains, and the same mailhost, only then block


Here's a sure way to block this kind of spam, though there is a price
for doing so.  For each mailing list that I subscribe to (or for all of
the mailing lists on a particular mailman server) I create a unique
email address that I use to subscribe to that list.  That userid
forwards to my real email address.

I then run some software capable of whitelisting/blacklisting at the
smtp level.  The one I run can whitelist or blacklist based on the
following (regular expressions are supported):

  * envelope sender
  * envelope recipient
  * helo name
  * remote ip address
  * remote hostname

So I create the following two rules (which must be processed in the
specified order):
Whitelist  remotehostname: *mail.centos.org*
Blacklist  envelope recipient: unique email address

This method works 100% of the time.  The price of doing this is:

1) You can't receive private emails from list members with out having
some type of on list exchange or adding their email to your whitelist.
2) You must post to the list using the address that you used to subscribe.

This has stopped all of the spam that I was getting from spammers that
harvest email addresses on mailing lists.

My whitelisting and blacklisting is done using vpostmaster (which is no
longer maintained), but I believe there are other packages which can be
used with postfix or exim to do this type of thing.

Nataraj

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Cisco UCS HBA Firmware - 1.6.0.12(b)

2015-08-27 Thread Saravanan Arumugam

Hello, 

Any idea when Cisco UCS Firmware Package will be included in centos Patching ?

I had planned for Ontab storage upgarde, hence needed this level firmware 
version on CentOS

Any help and leads will help me to plan the upgrade.

Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] apache mysterious 404 error

2015-08-27 Thread Luigi Rosa


Tim Dunphy wrote on 28/08/2015 00:18:


  And made sure that the document root setup in the vhost for the site I'm
serving has permissions for the apache user. Yet some of the files are
throwing a 404 error in a browser even tho they are clearly present and
accounted for on the file system.


Put

CheckSpelling on
CheckCaseOnly on

in vhost or Apache configuration

You have to enable mod_speling in /etc/httpd/conf.modules.d/00-base.conf


--


Ciao,
luigi

/
+--[Luigi Rosa]--
\

In case of fire, yell FIRE.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1693 Critical CentOS 5 firefox Security Update


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1693 Critical

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1693.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
4accd0ef78beb2cffe7de1eb2cb077d3260d2be1254241b94dcabd5429668ffa  
firefox-38.2.1-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm

x86_64:
4accd0ef78beb2cffe7de1eb2cb077d3260d2be1254241b94dcabd5429668ffa  
firefox-38.2.1-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm
ee12a3a8a5ef058838bb608ec2f7bedb4033c0a4494b14e562d0567f98b8fad6  
firefox-38.2.1-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm

Source:
c90518b13fdd40682ddfed92ebff461d50ba1b4504e553119caf965de91e5892  
firefox-38.2.1-1.el5.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

Re: [CentOS] apache mysterious 404 error

2015-08-27 Thread Peter

On 08/28/2015 10:18 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
 Hey guys,
 
  Just have a question about apache. Hoping to get an opinion on this.
 
  I've just setup a site under apache 2.4.
 
  And made sure that the document root setup in the vhost for the site I'm
 serving has permissions for the apache user. Yet some of the files are
 throwing a 404 error in a browser even tho they are clearly present and
 accounted for on the file system.
 
 For example, I'm getting this error:
 
 (index):1 GET 
 http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/altImg.png
 404 (*Not Found)

A GET request should not include the protocol (http) or hostname
(stage.theshopatmycomany.com).  Also as others pointed out it is
case-sensitive and you cannot use globbing (*) in the request.  Try this:

GET /mycomanystore/images/altImg.png HTTP/1.1
Host: stage.theshopatmycomanystudios.com

(note hit enter twice after the Host: line)


Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Gary Stainburn

On Thursday 27 August 2015 01:40:21 zep wrote:
 digital ocean finally replied (at least to me):

 Hi there,

 I'm sorry about this.  We gave our customer time to resolve the issue,
 and he hasn't done so, so we've blocked his ability to send email, pending
 further action if necessary to ensure this never occurs again.

 If you get or hear about ANY further spam like this, please let me know
 immediately so we can take further action on it.

 Regards,
 Cash, Trust  Safety Specialist
 Digital Ocean Support

 Perhaps it's fixed if only for a little while.

I can confirm that I haven't received anything since midnight yesterday 
morning so fingers crossed
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Gary Stainburn

On Wednesday 26 August 2015 20:11:20 g wrote:
 so the only harm is spam, which i now have going to my Junk folder.


That is not the only harm.  These people are very good and very effective 
confidence tricksters and are experts at getting vulnerable people to send 
them money which they usually cannot affort to lose in the first place.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] please block user

2015-08-27 Thread Gary Stainburn

Bad news Guys, they've just moved the emails to somewhere else and have 
started again:

Return-path: 
014f6ef4427c-8079d442-fc1e-4116-841a-ba157163def8-000...@amazonses.com
Envelope-to: g...@ringways.co.uk
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:39:10 +0100
Received: from a8-81.smtp-out.amazonses.com ([54.240.8.81])
by mail.ringways.co.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.84)
(envelope-from 
014f6ef4427c-8079d442-fc1e-4116-841a-ba157163def8-000...@amazonses.com)
id 1ZUvWO-000OYv-WE
for g...@ringways.co.uk; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:39:10 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple;
s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1440675545;

h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Feedback-ID;
bh=fVEJhWs8Q7XcrcFzcgBz4XutQlRwasAG6LBk6AIcMXk=;
b=sLK9RxQFIiu3wpu8v9mmIVYJcoXkVBacgYyzSYbkYbK/oZidKkKY/qDJWTDYKrCY
ksDKQs7UBpcSp4Sqog0hbDkK2DkkZiHT1kvzSb3qqkAnX3Ducm2AkOctxdRF9z76Pj1
4tXWWopJjegOWIw8kgqR9gCRHqwv+eBxjlQlZnuA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple;
s=koy5qxgfr6wvd7nlse57372ojbusvxt2; d=enjoylovef**k.com;
t=1440675545;

h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
bh=fVEJhWs8Q7XcrcFzcgBz4XutQlRwasAG6LBk6AIcMXk=;
b=bbmKwgB0hG2rPrgHwUes63nmRozyqrLi7VVW4qmLC6019nRt0Cf4enbC60kJQzZw
Qx/UaYetwOkCm4LUObL7zw+uP0JJYzNXVooAZD7NdB1Dzs5gwT5B5ltM2sv0xxA11ev
vnxdKiIUER2QKOcFOkYczDJV6QYtpOj3yr7cPYMM=
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:39:05 +
To: Gary Stainburn g...@ringways.co.uk g...@ringways.co.uk
From: Caylian Curtis caylian@enjoylovef**k.com
Reply-To: caylian@enjoylovef**k.com
Subject: Re: Re: [CentOS] please block user
Message-ID: 
014f6ef4427c-8079d442-fc1e-4116-841a-ba157163def8-000...@email.amazonses.com
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.2.10 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer/)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
  boundary=b1_51d7d61107a8c78e364939b05ceed99b
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SES-Outgoing: 2015.08.27-54.240.8.81
Feedback-ID: 
1.us-east-1.dCINwTXKWoGdJVCeRWe4yCPvzru4XXSdsNzu7qbGWgA=:AmazonSES
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] apache mysterious 404 error

2015-08-27 Thread Tim Dunphy

Hey Rodrigo,

Thanks for your reply.

Well those errors are pulled from the Chrome developer tools.

 I notice if I do a GET on that file using both all lower case as well as
the upper case that's in the URL I get the same result:

[root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# GET
http://stage.theshopatmycompanystudios.com/mycopmanyStore/images/altImg.png
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
htmlhead
title404 Not Found/title
/headbody
h1Not Found/h1
pThe requested URL /mycompanyStore/images/altImg.png was not found on
this server./p
/body/html

[root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# GET
http://stage.theshopatmycompanystudios.com/mycompanystore/images/altImg.png
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
htmlhead
title404 Not Found/title
/headbody
h1Not Found/h1
pThe requested URL /mycpmpanystore/images/altImg.png was not found on
this server./p
/body/html

This is how that file looks on the command line. I made a symlink to
account for the change in case, because I realize that's relevant:

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 128 Aug 27 12:22
/var/www/nbcstore/images/altImg.png

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 128 Aug 27 12:22
/var/www/mycompanyStore/images/altImg.png

Still not sure why I'm not able to do a GET on that and those other files.
Appreciate your input tho! And any other advice is certainly welcome!

Tim

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Rodrigo Maia rod.pm...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi apache on GNU/Linux  is case-sensitive samples:


 /var/www/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png
 /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg
 /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg
 /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg

 on  browser :


 (index):1 GET
 http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/altImg.png

 try :


 (index):1 GET
 http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png
 http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/altImg.png



 2015-08-27 19:18 GMT-03:00 Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com:

  Hey guys,
 
   Just have a question about apache. Hoping to get an opinion on this.
 
   I've just setup a site under apache 2.4.
 
   And made sure that the document root setup in the vhost for the site I'm
  serving has permissions for the apache user. Yet some of the files are
  throwing a 404 error in a browser even tho they are clearly present and
  accounted for on the file system.
 
  For example, I'm getting this error:
 
  (index):1 GET
  http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/altImg.png
  404 (*Not Found)
 
  (index):1 GET
 
 http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg
  404* (Not Found)
 
  (index):1 GET
 
 http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg
  404* (Not Found)
 
  (index):1 GET
 
 http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg
  404* (Not Found)
  And yet as I mentioned all those files are definitely there on the file
  system:
 
  [root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# ls -l
  /var/www/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png
  /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg
  /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg
  /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg
 
  -rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon128 Aug 27 12:22
  /var/www/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png
 
  -rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 260983 Jul 16 14:03
  /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg
 
  -rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 126628 Jul 16 14:00
  /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg
 
  -rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 222568 Jul 16 13:56
  /var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg
 
  And all those files have the correct ownership for apache:
 
  [root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# egrep -i user|group conf/httpd.conf |
  egrep -i -v -e '#' -e log -e module
 
  User daemon
 
  Group daemon
 
  All the files are owned by daemon:daemon!! So why on earth are these
 files
  giving a 404?
 
  This is my virtual host for the site:
 
 
  VirtualHost *
 
  ServerAdmin timothy.dun...@mycomany.com
 
  DocumentRoot /var/www/mycomanystore
 
  ServerName stage.theshopatmycomanystudios.com
 
  ServerAlias 173.213.219.48
 
  ErrorLog logs/store_error_log
 
  LogFormat %h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b common
 
  CustomLog logs/store_access_log common
 
  Directory /var/www/mycomanystore
 
DirectoryIndex index.html
 
AddHandler cgi-script .cgi
 
Options -Indexes +FollowSymLinks +ExecCGI +Includes
 
AllowOverride All
 
Require all granted
 
  /Directory
 
  ExpiresActive On
 
  ExpiresDefault access plus 30 minute
 
  RewriteEngine On
 
  RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^TRACE
 
  RewriteRule .* - [F]
 
  /VirtualHost
 
  Thanks
 
  Tim
 
 
  --
  GPG me!!
 
  gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
  ___
  CentOS mailing list
  CentOS@centos.org
  https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] apache mysterious 404 error

2015-08-27 Thread Philip Manuel




On 28/08/15 09:56, Tim Dunphy wrote:

Hey Rodrigo,

Thanks for your reply.

Well those errors are pulled from the Chrome developer tools.

  I notice if I do a GET on that file using both all lower case as well as
the upper case that's in the URL I get the same result:

[root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# GET
http://stage.theshopatmycompanystudios.com/mycopmanyStore/images/altImg.png
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
htmlhead
title404 Not Found/title
/headbody
h1Not Found/h1
pThe requested URL /mycompanyStore/images/altImg.png was not found on
this server./p
/body/html

[root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# GET
http://stage.theshopatmycompanystudios.com/mycompanystore/images/altImg.png
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
htmlhead
title404 Not Found/title
/headbody
h1Not Found/h1
pThe requested URL /mycpmpanystore/images/altImg.png was not found on
this server./p
/body/html

This is how that file looks on the command line. I made a symlink to
account for the change in case, because I realize that's relevant:

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 128 Aug 27 12:22
/var/www/nbcstore/images/altImg.png

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 128 Aug 27 12:22
/var/www/mycompanyStore/images/altImg.png

Still not sure why I'm not able to do a GET on that and those other files.
Appreciate your input tho! And any other advice is certainly welcome!

Tim

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Rodrigo Maia rod.pm...@gmail.com wrote:


Hi apache on GNU/Linux  is case-sensitive samples:


/var/www/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg

on  browser :


(index):1 GET
http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/altImg.png

try :


(index):1 GET
http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png
http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/altImg.png



2015-08-27 19:18 GMT-03:00 Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com:


Hey guys,

  Just have a question about apache. Hoping to get an opinion on this.

  I've just setup a site under apache 2.4.

  And made sure that the document root setup in the vhost for the site I'm
serving has permissions for the apache user. Yet some of the files are
throwing a 404 error in a browser even tho they are clearly present and
accounted for on the file system.

For example, I'm getting this error:

(index):1 GET
http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/altImg.png
404 (*Not Found)

(index):1 GET


http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg

404* (Not Found)

(index):1 GET


http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg

404* (Not Found)

(index):1 GET


http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg

404* (Not Found)
And yet as I mentioned all those files are definitely there on the file
system:

[root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# ls -l
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon128 Aug 27 12:22
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 260983 Jul 16 14:03
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 126628 Jul 16 14:00
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 222568 Jul 16 13:56
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg

And all those files have the correct ownership for apache:

[root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# egrep -i user|group conf/httpd.conf |
egrep -i -v -e '#' -e log -e module

User daemon

Group daemon

All the files are owned by daemon:daemon!! So why on earth are these

files

giving a 404?

This is my virtual host for the site:


VirtualHost *

 ServerAdmin timothy.dun...@mycomany.com

 DocumentRoot /var/www/mycomanystore

 ServerName stage.theshopatmycomanystudios.com

 ServerAlias 173.213.219.48

 ErrorLog logs/store_error_log

 LogFormat %h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b common

 CustomLog logs/store_access_log common

 Directory /var/www/mycomanystore

   DirectoryIndex index.html

   AddHandler cgi-script .cgi

   Options -Indexes +FollowSymLinks +ExecCGI +Includes

   AllowOverride All

   Require all granted

 /Directory

 ExpiresActive On

 ExpiresDefault access plus 30 minute

 RewriteEngine On

 RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^TRACE

 RewriteRule .* - [F]

/VirtualHost

Thanks

Tim


--
GPG me!!

gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




Do you get any

Re: [CentOS] apache mysterious 404 error

2015-08-27 Thread Barry Brimer


Well those errors are pulled from the Chrome developer tools.

  I notice if I do a GET on that file using both all lower case as well as
the upper case that's in the URL I get the same result:

[root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# GET
http://stage.theshopatmycompanystudios.com/mycopmanyStore/images/altImg.png
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
htmlhead
title404 Not Found/title
/headbody
h1Not Found/h1
pThe requested URL /mycompanyStore/images/altImg.png was not found on
this server./p
/body/html

[root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# GET
http://stage.theshopatmycompanystudios.com/mycompanystore/images/altImg.png
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
htmlhead
title404 Not Found/title
/headbody
h1Not Found/h1
pThe requested URL /mycpmpanystore/images/altImg.png was not found on
this server./p
/body/html

This is how that file looks on the command line. I made a symlink to
account for the change in case, because I realize that's relevant:

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 128 Aug 27 12:22
/var/www/nbcstore/images/altImg.png

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 128 Aug 27 12:22
/var/www/mycompanyStore/images/altImg.png

Still not sure why I'm not able to do a GET on that and those other files.
Appreciate your input tho! And any other advice is certainly welcome!

Tim

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Rodrigo Maia rod.pm...@gmail.com wrote:


Hi apache on GNU/Linux  is case-sensitive samples:


/var/www/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg

on  browser :


(index):1 GET
http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/altImg.png

try :


(index):1 GET
http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png
http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/altImg.png



2015-08-27 19:18 GMT-03:00 Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com:


Hey guys,

  Just have a question about apache. Hoping to get an opinion on this.

  I've just setup a site under apache 2.4.

  And made sure that the document root setup in the vhost for the site 
I'm

serving has permissions for the apache user. Yet some of the files are
throwing a 404 error in a browser even tho they are clearly present and
accounted for on the file system.

For example, I'm getting this error:

(index):1 GET
http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/altImg.png
404 (*Not Found)

(index):1 GET


http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg

404* (Not Found)

(index):1 GET


http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg

404* (Not Found)

(index):1 GET


http://stage.theshopatmycomany.com/mycomanyStore/images*/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg

404* (Not Found)
And yet as I mentioned all those files are definitely there on the file
system:

[root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# ls -l
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon128 Aug 27 12:22
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/altImg.png

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 260983 Jul 16 14:03
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_485x1215_R2.jpg

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 126628 Jul 16 14:00
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x413_R2.jpg

-rw-r--r--. 1 daemon daemon 222568 Jul 16 13:56
/var/www/mycomanystore/images/Jimmy_792x802_R2.jpg

And all those files have the correct ownership for apache:

[root@aozwsls00019la apache2]# egrep -i user|group conf/httpd.conf |
egrep -i -v -e '#' -e log -e module

User daemon

Group daemon

All the files are owned by daemon:daemon!! So why on earth are these

files

giving a 404?

This is my virtual host for the site:


VirtualHost *

 ServerAdmin timothy.dun...@mycomany.com

 DocumentRoot /var/www/mycomanystore

 ServerName stage.theshopatmycomanystudios.com

 ServerAlias 173.213.219.48

 ErrorLog logs/store_error_log

 LogFormat %h %l %u %t \%r\ %s %b common

 CustomLog logs/store_access_log common

 Directory /var/www/mycomanystore

   DirectoryIndex index.html

   AddHandler cgi-script .cgi

   Options -Indexes +FollowSymLinks +ExecCGI +Includes

   AllowOverride All

   Require all granted

 /Directory

 ExpiresActive On

 ExpiresDefault access plus 30 minute

 RewriteEngine On

 RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^TRACE

 RewriteRule .* - [F]

/VirtualHost


Do you get any errors in the error logs ?  And also have you checked whether 
selinux is having an effect ?


I can't tell if you are sending a literal '*' in your GET request, but if 
you are, I would try without it as I don't believe there is globbing in 
http nor do I believe that '*' is a legal character in a URL. I could be 
wrong about all of this, but that is what stands out to me.

___
CentOS

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1693 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update