[CentOS] Re: SOT: Best strategy for automatize a flow that need user interaction
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:09, reynie...@gmail.comwrote: I am working in a Dockerfile but there is a "secure" MariaDB server script I need to run which is interactive and I don't know how to deal with this. Basically this is the flow I have follow on the script at test environment and is the same I want to achieve in the Dockerfile without user interaction by just answering as you seen on the flow below: # /usr/bin/mysql_secure_installation [snip] So I need to write a bash script or something else that could handle this automatically but has not idea, how would you take care of this? You have a urgend need to re-invent the wheel, no? Have a look at the offical mariab image Dockerfile, be aware that it was written with debian:latest as base: https://github.com/docker-library/mariadb/blob/master/Dockerfile.template or, be even more clever and look at the centos/mariadb image: https://hub.docker.com/r/centos/mariadb/ https://github.com/CentOS/CentOS-Dockerfiles/tree/master/mariadb/centos7 I hope this gives you some pointers to avoid wasting time, but, each to their own, find your pesonal way. Have a nice weekend. - Yamaban. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Alternative HTML Editor
On 01/27/2016 11:15 AM, Tim Evans wrote: I've been using the SeaMonkey built-in HTML editor from the epel repo for CentOS 6.7: $ repoquery -i seamonkey Name: seamonkey Version : 2.39 Release : 1.el6 Architecture: x86_64 Size: 127340745 Packager: Fedora Project Group : Applications/Internet URL : http://www.seamonkey-project.org Repository : epel Summary : Web browser, e-mail, news, IRC client, HTML editor Source : seamonkey-2.39-1.el6.src.rpm This is now dumping core. The latest release, directly from Mozilla (2.9b4), fails with: /usr/local/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin: error while loading shared libraries: libdbus-glib-1.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Recommendations for alternative HTML editors for this system? To close the loop on this, I've been able to get the latest 32-bit beta of Seamonkey (2.9beta4, tar file downloaded directly from mozilla.org, not anyone's RPM) to work, after installing a batch of 32-bit libs and dependencies. Thanks to Clint Dilks and John R. Pierce for a little coaching on identifying the necessary libs. J.S. Evans suggested kompozer (http://www.kompozer.net/). This turned out to be a 32-bit app as well, but, even after installing a batch of 32-bit libs, it fails to load, and without presenting any error messages at all--just fails. Thanks, all. -- Tim Evans |5 Chestnut Court 443-394-3864|Owings Mills, MD 21117 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, 327 kernel still crashing
> -Original Message- > From: Wes James [mailto:compte...@me.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:04 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, 327 kernel still crashing > > > > On Jan 27, 2016, at 1:47 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > > > I've just added the following to the CentOS bugtracker for CentOS-7 > > 0009860. I admit to not being sure if it's the same issue, or a separate > > one, but this and other Dell servers - I *think* they're all R420's, but I > > could be wrong, just all do the same thing on boot. > > * > > I've just updated a CentOS 7 server to the latest kernel, > > vmlinuz-3.10.0-327.4.5.el7.x86_64, and the server fails to boot. It has > > failed on every 327 kernel. > > > > Server: Dell R420, 2 Xeons, 124G RAM. > > > > I have the same issue on a 2011 iMac. Usually a it takes one or two rounds > of kernels more and it starts working, but I have to stay on > 3.10.0-229.20.1 right now. All the 327’s crash on boot. > > -wes The `rpm -q --changelog ` of the 327 kernel looks like they only made three 'important' changes, and I think gives pointers to kernel.org changes you could use find the offending patches. Have you folks considered grabbing the srpm, backing out the each of the (three) changes between the pre 327 and 327 and building it yourself to figure out which thing broke your systems? Do either of you have any of the equipment listed in the 327 change? If so, that equipment patch is the patch I would focus on. Of course this will have you stepping off the CentOS reservation (thus use caution), but seeing as you are hanging back at 229, you are already on the fence. :) When you can point to the problem http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network.drbd/9973/focus=9996 sometimes folks will get it fixed quickly http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network.drbd/9973/focus=9996 I grant you, it was much easier back then, because the fedora and RH folks would have the patches as ... patches ... in the rpm that you could take out with a comment, but it can still be done with a more research. Even more fun might be to see if the elrepo kernel-lt or kernel-ml would work. Even when this disclaimer is not here: I am not a contracting officer. I do not have authority to make or modify the terms of any contract. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, 327 kernel still crashing
Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote: >> From: Wes James [mailto:compte...@me.com] >> > On Jan 27, 2016, at 1:47 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> > >> > I've just added the following to the CentOS bugtracker for CentOS-7 >> > 0009860. I admit to not being sure if it's the same issue, or a >> > separate one, but this and other Dell servers - I *think* they're >> > all R420's, but I could be wrong, just all do the same thing on boot. >> > * >> > I've just updated a CentOS 7 server to the latest kernel, >> > vmlinuz-3.10.0-327.4.5.el7.x86_64, and the server fails to boot. It >> > has failed on every 327 kernel. >> > >> > Server: Dell R420, 2 Xeons, 124G RAM. >> >> I have the same issue on a 2011 iMac. Usually a it takes one or two >> rounds of kernels more and it starts working, but I have to stay on >> 3.10.0-229.20.1 right now. All the 327’s crash on boot. >> > > The `rpm -q --changelog ` of the 327 kernel looks like they only made > three 'important' changes, and I think gives pointers to kernel.org > changes you could use find the offending patches. > Have you folks considered grabbing the srpm, backing out the each of the > (three) changes between the pre 327 and 327 and building it yourself to > figure out which thing broke your systems? Sorry, I really don't have the time. HOWEVER, here's an additional datum: I just updated some servers, and one failed to reboot, also dropping into the rdshell The thing is, this was vmlinuz-3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.x86_64, *not* a 327. When I went back to vmlinuz-3.10.0-229.14.1.el7.x86_64, I had no trouble. Note: in the rdshell, both with any 327 kernel, or with the 229-20, I had zero issues when I made a mountpoint and mounted /boot or /. I saved the rdshell from this morning, and have the ok to look more closely. I will note this: I'm now starting to wonder if this is possibly a systemd issue... or a grub2 issue. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] SOT: Best strategy for automatize a flow that need user interaction
I am working in a Dockerfile but there is a "secure" MariaDB server script I need to run which is interactive and I don't know how to deal with this. Basically this is the flow I have follow on the script at test environment and is the same I want to achieve in the Dockerfile without user interaction by just answering as you seen on the flow below: # /usr/bin/mysql_secure_installation Enter current password for root (enter for none): [ENTER] // because there is no password OK, successfully used password, moving on... Set root password? [Y/n] n ... skipping. Remove anonymous users? [Y/n] Y ... Success! Disallow root login remotely? [Y/n] n ... skipping. Remove test database and access to it? [Y/n] Y - Dropping test database... ... Success! - Removing privileges on test database... ... Success! Reloading the privilege tables will ensure that all changes made so far will take effect immediately. Reload privilege tables now? [Y/n] Y ... Success! Cleaning up... So I need to write a bash script or something else that could handle this automatically but has not idea, how would you take care of this? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Write content to file from Dockerfile and/or any other method
Thx to both of you, I forgot to add a SOT before the title because yes this is more a Docker question than a Linux one, my bad On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Yamabanwrote: > On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 06:31, Keith Keller wrote: > >> On 2016-01-29, reynie...@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> >>> I am building a Dockerfile and I am setting up MariaDB repos as follow: >>> >> >> This question is probably way offtopic for a CentOS mailing list. >> >> # Setup MariaDB repos >>> RUN touch /etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB.repo >>> >>> What's the right way to do this? The one below? >>> >>> echo "[mariadb]" >> "/etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB.repo" >>> echo "name = MariaDB" >> "/etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB.repo" >>> echo "baseurl = http://yum.mariadb.org/5.5/centos6-amd64; >> >>> "/etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB.repo" >>> echo "gpgkey=https://yum.mariadb.org/RPM-GPG-KEY-MariaDB; >> >>> "/etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB.repo" >>> echo "gpgcheck=1" >> "/etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB.repo" >>> >> >> You probably want to do a COPY. The Docker docs cover Dockerfile syntax >> in detail: >> >> https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/#copy >> > > Yep, this is a much better way to do such things. > create the 'MariaDB.repo' in the direstory the 'Dockerfile' resides in, > and use the following line in the Dockerfile: > > [code] > COPY MariaDB.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB.repo > [/code] > > much better that way, for further tips on Dockerfile writing, > I'll point you to the offical site "docs.docker.com", esp: > > https://docs.docker.com/engine/articles/dockerfile_best-practices/ > > Have a nice weekend, > - Yamaban. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent
>> Jonathan Billings wrote: >> >> >> > Maybe you're not >> >> > aware of it, but there are a LOT of things that systemd fixes that >> >> > people are happy about. >> >> >> Like what ? I don't remember there were as many errors to fix before >> >> systemd appeared. >> >> > I suggest reading the previous emails (SOME OF WHICH YOU REPLIED TO) >> > that listed many of the features people are happy about. >> >> I don't take a position in the systemd argument, >> but you said that systemd fixes lots of problems. >> It is perfectly reasonable to ask you to name one of these problems, >> perhaps the one you think is most important. > > Well, here's a great one. I agree with Matthew: > > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2016-January/157399.html > > Note who responded to that message. ... And what "who" answered. Sylvain. Pensez ENVIRONNEMENT : n'imprimer que si ncessaire ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Write content to file from Dockerfile and/or any other method
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 06:31, Keith Kellerwrote: On 2016-01-29, reynie...@gmail.com wrote: I am building a Dockerfile and I am setting up MariaDB repos as follow: This question is probably way offtopic for a CentOS mailing list. # Setup MariaDB repos RUN touch /etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB.repo What's the right way to do this? The one below? echo "[mariadb]" >> "/etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB.repo" echo "name = MariaDB" >> "/etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB.repo" echo "baseurl = http://yum.mariadb.org/5.5/centos6-amd64; >> "/etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB.repo" echo "gpgkey=https://yum.mariadb.org/RPM-GPG-KEY-MariaDB; >> "/etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB.repo" echo "gpgcheck=1" >> "/etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB.repo" You probably want to do a COPY. The Docker docs cover Dockerfile syntax in detail: https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/#copy Yep, this is a much better way to do such things. create the 'MariaDB.repo' in the direstory the 'Dockerfile' resides in, and use the following line in the Dockerfile: [code] COPY MariaDB.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/MariaDB.repo [/code] much better that way, for further tips on Dockerfile writing, I'll point you to the offical site "docs.docker.com", esp: https://docs.docker.com/engine/articles/dockerfile_best-practices/ Have a nice weekend, - Yamaban. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-docs] Multilanguage design
Hello. I have an initiative of multilanguage wiki upgrade. Current version has no multilanguage user interface which can not be translated. As of current moment we have many people who use wiki with different languages but navigation lead them into English sections only. Can we start new deployment (project) which will be true multilangual. Then move all actual content from current wiki. The questions are: 1. How to start this project if this is possible? 2. Where it can be hosted? If there is no way to host it, which hosting provider has discount for us as community? How much the project will cost? 3. How many people do we have to work on it? ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS] Where did network setup goes under setup utility in CentOS 7?
In CentOS 6.7 I ran setup command and I could configure network settings from that "gui" utility at command line. In CentOS 7 I don't know where this goes or how to enabled. I have installed a few packages: yum install setuptool -y \ && yum install system-config-network-tui -y \ && yum install system-config-firewall* -y \ && yum install system-config-securitylevel-tui -y \ && yum install system-config-keyboard -y \ && yum install ntsysv -y But I can't see the network settings, see this pic: http://content.screencast.com/users/ReynierPM/folders/Snagit/media/39e744c6-1575-47b6-b3fb-6e95280fe21d/01.29.2016-11.38.png Should I install any other package? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Apache doesn't display "It works page" under CentOS 7
On 29/01/16 16:45, reynie...@gmail.com wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Michael Hwrote: > >> setsebool -P httpd_can_network_connect on >> firewall-cmd --add-service=http --permanent >> > > I have ran those two and still can't access. I have restarted httpd and > iptables services after ran those lines. BTW, what those means? setsebool > is part of SELinux? Or this is new kind of extra security layer on CentOS7? > I am moving from Centos 6.7 to 7 and things change between versions. Selinux has been around for a while. setsebool - set selinux boolean You should probably be using the firewall-cmd rather than iptables; firewall-cmd --add-service=http --permanent - add the http service to your firewall. I forgot, unless you run firewall-cmd --reload the rules may not be in play. Michael > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Apache doesn't display "It works page" under CentOS 7
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Michael Hwrote: > Selinux has been around for a while. > Yes, I know this but ... > > setsebool - set selinux boolean > What I am asking is if the command above is part of SELinux since I doesn't use before because it's a VM running on my PC so I not need such security levels. > > You should probably be using the firewall-cmd rather than iptables; > firewall-cmd --add-service=http --permanent - add the http service to > your firewall. > > I forgot, unless you run > > firewall-cmd --reload > > the rules may not be in play. > U # firewall-cmd --reload FirewallD is not running ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Apache doesn't display "It works page" under CentOS 7
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Michael Hwrote: > I've setup several web servers this week, if this isn't working, you > broke something. We always use minimal installs. > No problem, it works! Thx ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Apache doesn't display "It works page" under CentOS 7
I have Apache/2.4.6 installed in a minimal CentOS 7 VM. I am trying to access the default page when Apache is installed by accessing the CentOS IP as http://192.168.3.130 (is a host only interface) but I got "This webpage is not available: ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT" and I can't find why. I have stopped iptables and then checked: # service iptables status Redirecting to /bin/systemctl status iptables.service ● iptables.service - IPv4 firewall with iptables Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/iptables.service; disabled; vendor preset: disabled) Active: inactive (dead) Jan 29 11:22:43 devserver.local systemd[1]: Stopped IPv4 firewall with iptables. isn't running. I have checked the status of Apache: # service httpd status Redirecting to /bin/systemctl status httpd.service ● httpd.service - The Apache HTTP Server Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/httpd.service; disabled; vendor preset: disabled) Active: active (running) since Fri 2016-01-29 11:16:00 EST; 7min ago Docs: man:httpd(8) man:apachectl(8) Main PID: 18738 (httpd) Status: "Total requests: 0; Current requests/sec: 0; Current traffic: 0 B/sec" CGroup: /system.slice/httpd.service ├─18738 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND ├─18739 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND ├─18740 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND ├─18741 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND ├─18742 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND └─18743 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND Jan 29 11:15:58 devserver.local systemd[1]: Starting The Apache HTTP Server... Jan 29 11:15:59 devserver.local httpd[18738]: AH00557: httpd: apr_sockaddr_info_get() failed for devserver.local Jan 29 11:15:59 devserver.local httpd[18738]: AH00558: httpd: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain name, using 127.0.0.1. Set the 'ServerName' directive globally to suppress this message Jan 29 11:16:00 devserver.local systemd[1]: Started The Apache HTTP Server. it's running. I have checked network status: # ifconfig eno1628: flags=4163mtu 1500 inet 192.168.222.133 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.222.255 inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe6f:2b72 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20 ether 00:0c:29:6f:2b:72 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 152628 bytes 225455749 (215.0 MiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 54931 bytes 3355746 (3.2 MiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 eno33554952: flags=4163 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.3.130 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.3.255 inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe6f:2b7c prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20 ether 00:0c:29:6f:2b:7c txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 9655 bytes 702056 (685.6 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 5800 bytes 529054 (516.6 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 lo: flags=73 mtu 65536 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10 loop txqueuelen 0 (Local Loopback) RX packets 20 bytes 1700 (1.6 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 20 bytes 1700 (1.6 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 it's fine. I have ping server from Windows: C:\Users\reynierpm>ping 192.168.3.130 Pinging 192.168.3.130 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.3.130: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.3.130: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.3.130: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.3.130: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.3.130: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms it works. So ... what's wrong? What I am missing here? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Apache doesn't display "It works page" under CentOS 7
On 29/01/16 16:35, reynie...@gmail.com wrote: > I have Apache/2.4.6 installed in a minimal CentOS 7 VM. I am trying to > access the default page when Apache is installed by accessing the CentOS IP > as http://192.168.3.130 (is a host only interface) but I got "This webpage > is not available: ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT" and I can't find why. I have > stopped iptables and then checked: my first guess would be; setsebool -P httpd_can_network_connect on firewall-cmd --add-service=http --permanent if you're serving over https you'll also want; firewall-cmd --add-service=https --permanent if you intend on sending email; setsebool -P httpd_can_sendmail on ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SOT: Best strategy for automatize a flow that need user interaction
On 2016-01-29, reynie...@gmail.comwrote: > I am working in a Dockerfile but there is a "secure" MariaDB server script > I need to run which is interactive and I don't know how to deal with this. Honestly, I think your best long-term strategy for getting help with Docker is a Docker list. Personally I have no major problems with OT questions, but if you ask your question someplace where everyone uses (and maybe even develops) your software you're much more likely to get a more complete and correct answer. On this list you're hoping that there's enough of a subset of users to answer your questions, and of that subset who knows how many of them really know what they're doing. If the software you were asking about were some strange obscure program that few people use any more, I could see asking everywhere you could on the off-chance that someone knows about it. But for something so popular like Docker there's no reason to go away from their discussion forums. --keith -- kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SOT: Best strategy for automatize a flow that need user interaction
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Keith Keller < kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote: > Honestly, I think your best long-term strategy for getting help with > Docker is a Docker list. Personally I have no major problems with OT > questions, but if you ask your question someplace where everyone uses > (and maybe even develops) your software you're much more likely to get > a more complete and correct answer. On this list you're hoping that > there's enough of a subset of users to answer your questions, and of > that subset who knows how many of them really know what they're doing. > > If the software you were asking about were some strange obscure program > that few people use any more, I could see asking everywhere you could on > the off-chance that someone knows about it. But for something so > popular like Docker there's no reason to go away from their discussion > forums. > No problem Keith, I will move this discussion to Docker google groups and perhaps I will get a better answer :-) thanks for your suggestion Cheers ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Apache doesn't display "It works page" under CentOS 7
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Michael Hwrote: > setsebool -P httpd_can_network_connect on > firewall-cmd --add-service=http --permanent > I have ran those two and still can't access. I have restarted httpd and iptables services after ran those lines. BTW, what those means? setsebool is part of SELinux? Or this is new kind of extra security layer on CentOS7? I am moving from Centos 6.7 to 7 and things change between versions. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Apache doesn't display "It works page" under CentOS 7
I should add this is a minimal CentOS perhaps it's lacks a few packages and I am not aware of which ones On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:52 AM, reynie...@gmail.comwrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Michael H wrote: > >> Selinux has been around for a while. >> > > Yes, I know this but ... > > >> >> setsebool - set selinux boolean >> > > What I am asking is if the command above is part of SELinux since I > doesn't use before because it's a VM running on my PC so I not need such > security levels. > > >> >> You should probably be using the firewall-cmd rather than iptables; >> firewall-cmd --add-service=http --permanent - add the http service to >> your firewall. >> >> I forgot, unless you run >> >> firewall-cmd --reload >> >> the rules may not be in play. >> > > U > > # firewall-cmd --reload > FirewallD is not running > > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7, 327 kernel still crashing
Ok, more info. I've just looked at the rdsosreport from a 327 kernel, and the one from this morning, from the 229-20 kernel, and I see where they croak: [3.045600] lym.cit.nih.gov systemd[1]: Found device ST500NM0003-9ZM172 /. [3.045950] lym.cit.nih.gov systemd[1]: Starting File System Check on /dev/disk/by-label/\x2f... [3.047209] lym.cit.nih.gov systemd-fsck[575]: Failed to detect device /dev/disk/by-label// [3.047337] lym.cit.nih.gov systemd[1]: systemd-fsck-root.service: main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE [3.047449] lym.cit.nih.gov systemd[1]: Failed to start File System Check on /dev/disk/by-label/\x2f. [3.047559] lym.cit.nih.gov systemd[1]: Dependency failed for /sysroot. and yet. starting at line 75 of 1281, I see + ls -l /dev/disk/by-id /dev/disk/by-label /dev/disk/by-path /dev/disk/by-uuid <...> /dev/disk/by-label: total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root 0 10 Jan 29 14:27 SWAP-sda2 -> ../../sda2 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root 0 10 Jan 29 14:27 \x2f -> ../../sda3 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root 0 10 Jan 29 14:27 \x2fboot -> ../../sda1 So, at some point, it seems to have lost the visibility to /dev/disk/by-label. Any thoughts, here? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Apache doesn't display "It works page" under CentOS 7
On 29/01/16 16:52, reynie...@gmail.com wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Michael Hwrote: > >> Selinux has been around for a while. >> > > Yes, I know this but ... > > >> >> setsebool - set selinux boolean >> > > What I am asking is if the command above is part of SELinux since I doesn't > use before because it's a VM running on my PC so I not need such security > levels. > >> You should probably be using the firewall-cmd rather than iptables; >> firewall-cmd --add-service=http --permanent - add the http service to >> your firewall. >> >> I forgot, unless you run >> >> firewall-cmd --reload >> >> the rules may not be in play. > U > > # firewall-cmd --reload > FirewallD is not running systemctl stop iptables systemctl disable iptables systemctl start firewalld systemctl enable firewalld firewall-cmd --list-services - confirm you have http, if not repeat the previous commands to add services. setsebool is a part of selinux. if you don't care about it setenforce 0 systemctl restart httpd firewall-cmd --reload and test. ensure /etc/httpd/conf.d/[yourvirtualhost].conf has listen *:80 I've setup several web servers this week, if this isn't working, you broke something. We always use minimal installs. Michael ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Where did network setup goes under setup utility in CentOS 7?
Run: nmtui > On Jan 29, 2016, at 11:42 AM, "reynie...@gmail.com"> wrote: > > Should I install any other package ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] man and man-db inconsitency
On 1/29/2016 9:22 PM, david wrote: Is there a reason for this inconsistency? The above algorithm works with most other packages. what 'algorithm' ? there's no fixed correlation between program name and package name. for example, the package providing 'iostat' and 'sar' is called sysstat. And, some packages change their names in different major releases of an OS. Some packages are dropped entirely in new releases, and other packages are added. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] man and man-db inconsitency
Folks I use "yum list installed" to determine if a package has been installed. In particular, I was interested in the "man" program, installed with the command "yum install man". In Centos6, if I look at the results, I see that "man" was installed. This is good. In Centos7, if I look at the results, I see that "man-db" was installed. This is inconsistent. The result is that the generic algorithm: if I want package X , check the "yum list installed" output. If X is not listed, install it, otherwise assume it's already installed. Is there a reason for this inconsistency? The above algorithm works with most other packages. David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Where did network setup goes under setup utility in CentOS 7?
On 1/29/2016 10:42 AM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote: In CentOS 6.7 I ran setup command and I could configure network settings from that "gui" utility at command line. In CentOS 7 I don't know where this goes or how to enabled. I have installed a few packages: You're looking for nmtui. I went through this pain recently, so I'll share a few things you're going to want to know about the firewall & network manager. Configure the firewall with firewalld-cmd. Don't use --permanent with firewalld-cmd, instead do all of your changes then run: firewalld-cmd --runtime-to-permanent Even though firewalld-cmd seems to allow you to change the zones of interfaces, it doesn't work like you'd think it does by reading the documentation. Instead, use: nmcli con modify ens224 connection.zone trusted Adjusting your ens224 and zone as necessary, of course. This is the only way I've identified which will consistently and permanently change the connection zone. If yum updates network manager or firewalld, you need to reload the services for the tools to work correctly; especially after a fresh install! systemctl daemon --reload This will reload all the daemons. -- --- - Nick Bright- - Vice President of Technology - - Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- - - Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789 - - Web http://www.valnet.net/ - --- - Are your files safe?- - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup - - More information & 30 day free trial at - - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault - --- This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission. If you have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by reply E-mail and immediately delete this message from your system. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos