[CentOS] Thunderbird .desktop file is renamed in version 45.2
I was starting my Thunderbird via a script and I thought I would post that the name of the desktop file has changed to help anyone else who was running the desktop file from a script. Old path was: /usr/share/applications/mozilla-thunderbird.desktop New Path is: /usr/share/applications/thunderbird.desktop Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and Glassfish 2.1.1
Hello. Thank you for your comments. Investigating further I've discovered where glassfish maintain the logs for core dumps: $GLASSFISH_HOME$/domains/domain1/config And they have the following name: hs_err_pid.log Hopefully this will help someone who runs into the same problem. Thank you. El 11/07/2016 a las 05:54 p. m., John R Pierce escribió: On 7/11/2016 3:38 PM, Efraín Déctor wrote: Yes. But it is possible to use Glassfish 2.1.1 with Java 1.7 (I have other systems using that combo and they work fine). I cannot use Glassfish 4.1.1 because the application only runs in 2.1.1. well, glassfish is open source, and its not part of CentOS so you'd best take this up with the Glassfish community, and/or debug it yourself. While we use Java SE at $job, we've avoided Java EE like the plague. *WAY* too many moving parts for our tastes. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and Glassfish 2.1.1
On 7/11/2016 3:38 PM, Efraín Déctor wrote: Yes. But it is possible to use Glassfish 2.1.1 with Java 1.7 (I have other systems using that combo and they work fine). I cannot use Glassfish 4.1.1 because the application only runs in 2.1.1. well, glassfish is open source, and its not part of CentOS so you'd best take this up with the Glassfish community, and/or debug it yourself. While we use Java SE at $job, we've avoided Java EE like the plague. *WAY* too many moving parts for our tastes. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and Glassfish 2.1.1
El 11/07/2016 a las 05:35 p. m., John R Pierce escribió: On 7/11/2016 3:17 PM, Efraín Déctor wrote: Hello. Is Sun/Oracle Java, I installed Glassfish using this guide: https://glassfish.java.net/downloads/v2.1.1-final.html that says to install JDK 5 or 6, not 1.7, for Glassfish 2.1.1, which is a rather old release. the current release is 4.1.1, implementing Java EE 7, https://glassfish.java.net/download.html Yes. But it is possible to use Glassfish 2.1.1 with Java 1.7 (I have other systems using that combo and they work fine). I cannot use Glassfish 4.1.1 because the application only runs in 2.1.1. Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and Glassfish 2.1.1
On 7/11/2016 3:17 PM, Efraín Déctor wrote: Hello. Is Sun/Oracle Java, I installed Glassfish using this guide: https://glassfish.java.net/downloads/v2.1.1-final.html that says to install JDK 5 or 6, not 1.7, for Glassfish 2.1.1, which is a rather old release. the current release is 4.1.1, implementing Java EE 7, https://glassfish.java.net/download.html -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and Glassfish 2.1.1
El 11/07/2016 a las 05:11 p. m., John R Pierce escribió: On 7/11/2016 2:40 PM, Efraín Déctor wrote: I have a server with CentOS 7 installed, on this server I installed Java 1.7 (java version "1.7.0_80") and Glassfish 2.1.1. The last few days I've ran into a problem: Glassfish process got killed twice and I don't have a clue why is getting terminated, I know that sometimes processes get killed if RAM is not enough; however on this server I have 62GB of RAM and 10GB of SWAP and Glassfish is configured to use only 15GB of RAM. I've looked on all the logs on /var/log and there is nothing there, I don't see any message that can't tell me why is the process being terminated. I've not run it in YEARS, but I believe Glassfish maintains its own logs under wherever its installed. is that Java 1.7 the Sun/Oracle Java, or is it OpenJDK ? and where was Glassfish installed from? I didn't think that was built into CentOS 7 or any of the common repositories. Hello. Is Sun/Oracle Java, I installed Glassfish using this guide: https://glassfish.java.net/downloads/v2.1.1-final.html On Glassfish logs the last messages I see are from the application runing on it. Thank you! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and Glassfish 2.1.1
On 7/11/2016 2:40 PM, Efraín Déctor wrote: I have a server with CentOS 7 installed, on this server I installed Java 1.7 (java version "1.7.0_80") and Glassfish 2.1.1. The last few days I've ran into a problem: Glassfish process got killed twice and I don't have a clue why is getting terminated, I know that sometimes processes get killed if RAM is not enough; however on this server I have 62GB of RAM and 10GB of SWAP and Glassfish is configured to use only 15GB of RAM. I've looked on all the logs on /var/log and there is nothing there, I don't see any message that can't tell me why is the process being terminated. I've not run it in YEARS, but I believe Glassfish maintains its own logs under wherever its installed. is that Java 1.7 the Sun/Oracle Java, or is it OpenJDK ? and where was Glassfish installed from? I didn't think that was built into CentOS 7 or any of the common repositories. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 7 and Glassfish 2.1.1
Hello. I have a server with CentOS 7 installed, on this server I installed Java 1.7 (java version "1.7.0_80") and Glassfish 2.1.1. The last few days I've ran into a problem: Glassfish process got killed twice and I don't have a clue why is getting terminated, I know that sometimes processes get killed if RAM is not enough; however on this server I have 62GB of RAM and 10GB of SWAP and Glassfish is configured to use only 15GB of RAM. I've looked on all the logs on /var/log and there is nothing there, I don't see any message that can't tell me why is the process being terminated. Is there other place or is there something I can do to know why is this happening? uname -a Linux server.edh.mx 3.10.0-229.11.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Aug 6 01:06:18 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Thank you very much. Best regards, Efrain ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: NetworkManger creates extra bonds; is this a bug?
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:47, Joe Smithian wrote: Hi Neil, Thanks for your comments. What's the purpose of creating spurious ‘bond0’? It's confusing. Is it anywhere documented? Every time I restart NetworkManager it creates another bond0! Joe [snip] For me the soution was to create a script that removes the "bond0" when NetworkManager is stopped, I have it integrated into the NetworkManager.service via a drop-in scriptlet into the dir "/etc/systemd/system/NetworkManager.service.d/" here is my scriptlet: /etc/systemd/system/NetworkManager.service.d/remove-bond0-at-stop [code] # remove "bond0" interface at stop, it will be re-created at start [Service] ExecStopPost=/usr/bin/bash /path/to/shellscript [/code] sadly the shell script has been lost since, with the move to a machine with 10GbE interfaces. - Yamaban.___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NetworkManger creates extra bonds; is this a bug?
Hi Neil,
Thanks for your comments. What's the purpose of creating spurious ‘bond0’?
It's confusing. Is it anywhere documented?
Every time I restart NetworkManager it creates another bond0!
Joe
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Digimer wrote:
> On 07/07/16 05:36 PM, Digimer wrote:
> > On 07/07/16 05:21 PM, Joe Smithian wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1.
> >> Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the
> Red
> >> Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as
> >> expected.
> >> When I restart NetworkManager, it creates a new bond with the same name
> but
> >> not connected to any device. Two bonds with the same name is confusing
> for
> >> my other monitoring scripts.
> >> I'm wondering why a second bond is created? Is it a bug in
> NetworkManger?
> >>
> >>
> >> #Create a bond with two slaves
> >> nmcli con add autoconnect no type bond con-name bond0 ifname bond0
> >> nmcli con mod bond0 ipv6.method ignore ipv4.method manual
> ipv4.addresses
> >> ${BOND_IP}/${BOND_CIDR} ${BOND_GW} ${BOND_DNS} ${BOND_DNS_SEARCH}
> >> ipv4.never-default no ipv4.ignore-auto-dns no
> >> nmcli con add autoconnect no type bond-slave con-name bond-slave-eth0
> >> ifname eth0 master bond0
> >> nmcli con add autoconnect no type bond-slave con-name bond-slave-eth1
> >> ifname eth1 master bond0
> >>
> >> #Enable bond
> >> nmcli con mod bond-slave-eth0 connection.autoconnect yes
> >> nmcli con up bond-slave-eth0
> >>
> >> nmcli con mod bond-slave-eth1 connection.autoconnect yes
> >> nmcli con up bond-slave-eth1
> >>
> >> nmcli con mod bond0 connection.autoconnect yes
> >> nmcli con up bond0
> >>
> >> systemctl restart NetworkManager
> >> systemctl restart iptables
> >>
> >> nmcli con | grep bond
> >> bond09942bdc6-df72-4723-b2ed-47a78e3a5c59 bond
> bond0
> >> bond-slave-eth0 8b0fbbe1-a7f0-448c-8005-46d11599f57a 802-3-ethernet
> eth0
> >> bond-slave-eth1 333dd1b9-15a4-4119-8e42-55ac3621a85d 802-3-ethernet
> eth1
> >> *bond0460dd9e8-bc0b-473e-9c89-41facda98b66 bond
> >> --# Why this extra bond connections has been created?*
> >>
> >>
> >> I'd appreciate your comments and suggestions to fix the issue.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Joe
> >
> > To this day, on EL6, creating bonds always generates a spurious 'bond0'
> > interface with no slaved interfaces. It was reported to red hat bugzilla
> > ages ago but the issue was closed without resolution (sorry, I've been
> > looking for the rhbz# but haven't found it yet).
> >
> > digimer
>
> Found it:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245440
>
>
> Neil Horman 2015-07-22 14:30:57 EDT
>
> inserting the bonding module always creates the first bond interface,
> thats always how its been, and isn't a bug.
>
> Status: NEW → CLOSED
> Resolution: --- → NOTABUG
> Last Closed: 2015-07-22 14:30:57
>
>
> digimer
>
> --
> Digimer
> Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
> What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
> access to education?
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
