Re: [CentOS] kickstart problems since 7.3

2017-01-06 Thread Gordon Messmer
I tracked this down, eventually.  Under RHEL/CentOS 7.2, the rootfs was 
limited to the size of available memory.  Under 7.3, there's an 
artificial restriction of 50% of total system memory.  The default size 
of a VM under "virt-manager" is 1G, which creates a ~500MB rootfs in the 
installer.  That filesystem is too small to run the installation in most 
cases.


The documented minimum is still 1GB of RAM, but that's no longer 
sufficient to complete the installation of 7.3:

https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits

I'm going to file a bug and ask Red Hat to document the new minimums.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] does your kdump work?

2017-01-06 Thread lejeczek

hi all

mine does not, and I've tampered with it in many ways, 
cannot get it to work.


best,
L.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Strange (?) device.map in CentOS 7 VM installations

2017-01-06 Thread m . roth
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/06/2017 07:11 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>> Any feedback regarding this "issue" and its possible repercussions
>> will be appreciated!
>
> Probably none.  That file indicates which Linux device file corresponds
> to the (hdX) references in grub.cfg.  I'm not really sure it's even used
> under grub2, since I don't see any of the (hdX) references in grub.cfg
> on the system I checked.

It's used. I can assure you of that, having had to fight one or two
systems back and bootable again

mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firefox Issue

2017-01-06 Thread m . roth
James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Thu, January 5, 2017 17:23, Always Learning wrote:
>>
>> Cyber attacks are gradually replacing armed conflicts.
>
> Better fight with bits than blood.

Yes, but... attacks on the friggin' IoT could result in lots of blood. Or,
less so, what do you mean all the rail lines have been knocked out of
commission for a week, and we can't get food to the eastern half of the
country? Or power?

mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] mlx4_0 Initializing and... (infiniband)

2017-01-06 Thread lejeczek

... Initializing..

hi all,

I've a a very basic setup, directly two boxes via two 
MHEH28-XTC and I cannot activate them.

One peculiar thing is I get (randomly & !often):

[85947.090496] AMD-Vi: Event logged [
[85947.090539] IO_PAGE_FAULT device=09:00.7 domain=0x 
address=0xf6ffb000 flags=0x0050]

[85947.298509] AMD-Vi: Event logged [
[85947.298550] IO_PAGE_FAULT device=09:00.7 domain=0x 
address=0xf6ffb000 flags=0x0050]


which is the card itself, judging by the device id
Would you have and share some thoughts please?

$ ./flint/mstflint -d 09:00.0 q # for both cards

-W- Running quick query - Skipping full image integrity checks.

Image type:  FS2
FW Version:  2.9.1000
Device ID:   25408
Description: Node Port1Port2 Sys 
image
GUIDs:   0008f104039a62a0 0008f104039a62a1 
0008f104039a62a2 0008f104039a62a3
MACs:  
0001

VSD:
PSID:MT_04A0110001

$ ibstat
CA 'mlx4_0'
CA type: MT25408
Number of ports: 2
Firmware version: 2.9.1000
Hardware version: a0
Node GUID: 0x0008f104039a08dc
System image GUID: 0x0008f104039a08df
Port 1:
State: Initializing
Physical state: LinkUp
Rate: 10
Base lid: 1
LMC: 0
SM lid: 1
Capability mask: 0x0259086a
Port GUID: 0x0008f104039a08dd
Link layer: InfiniBand
Port 2:
State: Down
Physical state: Polling
Rate: 10
Base lid: 0
LMC: 0
SM lid: 0
Capability mask: 0x0259086a
Port GUID: 0x0008f104039a08de
Link layer: InfiniBand

in opensm log:

Jan 06 17:00:28 817185 [F6D5A700] 0x01 -> 
sm_mad_ctrl_send_err_cb: ERR 3113: MAD completed in error 
(IB_TIMEOUT): SubnGet(NodeInfo), attr_mod 0x0, TID 0x1cd1
Jan 06 17:00:28 817200 [F6D5A700] 0x01 -> 
sm_mad_ctrl_send_err_cb: ERR 3120 Timeout while getting 
attribute 0x11 (NodeInfo); Possible mis-set mkey?


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Strange (?) device.map in CentOS 7 VM installations

2017-01-06 Thread Gordon Messmer

On 01/06/2017 07:11 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Any feedback regarding this "issue" and its possible repercussions 
will be appreciated! 



Probably none.  That file indicates which Linux device file corresponds 
to the (hdX) references in grub.cfg.  I'm not really sure it's even used 
under grub2, since I don't see any of the (hdX) references in grub.cfg 
on the system I checked.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firefox Issue

2017-01-06 Thread James B. Byrne

On Thu, January 5, 2017 17:23, Always Learning wrote:
>
>
> Cyber attacks are gradually replacing armed conflicts.
>

Better fight with bits than blood.


-- 
***  e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
 Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail

James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Strange (?) device.map in CentOS 7 VM installations

2017-01-06 Thread Nikolaos Milas

On 5/1/2017 11:04 πμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:

Can others please report the content of /boot/grub2/device.map on 
their CentOS 7 (physical or virtual) installations?


Thank you all for your reports. Since it seems this is generally the 
case with CentOS 7, does anyone also have access to RHEL 7 installations 
to verify if this is the case with these installations as well?


And can any tech geek please explain when/why do we have these 
"duplicates" and if they are intentional or not?


Any feedback regarding this "issue" and its possible repercussions will 
be appreciated!


Thanks a lot,
Nick
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CDB tables in Centos7 Postfix ?

2017-01-06 Thread Peter
On 06/01/17 05:25, Tim Smith wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> It seems the default binaries don't have CDB tables compiled into them ?

The GhettoForge postfix3 Packages have CDB support for CentOS 7 if you
install the postfix3-cdb package:

http://ghettoforge.org/index.php/Postfix3

Please note that the latest version is currently in the gf-testing repo,
it should be pushed out to gf-plus in a day or two.


Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CDB tables in Centos7 Postfix ?

2017-01-06 Thread Tim Smith
> You failed to mention the release in question.  However you can try the
> postfix packages in the centosplus repo which I believe have support for
> additional map types.
>
>

Oops, my bad.  CentOS 7.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos