Re: [CentOS] CentOS-5 End of Life
> Am 03.03.2017 um 13:19 schrieb James Hogarth : > > On 3 March 2017 at 11:47, James Hogarth wrote: >> On 3 March 2017 at 11:34, John Hodrien wrote: >>> On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Tony Mountifield wrote: >>> You mean just thrown away, or archived somewhere? Just thrown away would seem rather irresponsible... >>> >>> >>> Mirroring EPEL makes sense well before this point, as they don't keep old >>> versions of packages online either AFAIK. >>> >>> jh >>> >>> >> >> Indeed they aren't kept ... and since there hasn't been an EOL of EPEL >> before I honestly have no idea ... I've asked on the epel-devel >> mailing list as to whether it'll move to archive like old fedora >> releases do. > > My mistake - I forgot there was an EPEL4 in the mists of time .. so > the last version of the repo is likely to end up here: > > http://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/ JFI: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/YTEBPQPLP7NIVR3C533EBHEAERPH26P3/ -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: On 03/08/2017 07:09 PM, Mark Weaver wrote: > > I followed your guide to the letter, however I think it seems I > > missed something. When I test with telnet to port 25 this is the > > result: > > > > > telnet merlin 25 > > Trying 10.10.3.6... > > Connected to merlin.ciss.local. > > Escape character is '^]'. > > 220 mdw1982.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.7/8.13.8; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 > 16:53:31 -0500 > > ehlo merlin > > 250-mdw1982.com Hello [10.10.3.102], pleased to meet you > > 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES > > 250-PIPELINING > > 250-8BITMIME > > 250-SIZE > > 250-DSN > > 250-ETRN > > 250-DELIVERBY > > 250 HELP > > > auth login > > 504 5.3.3 AUTH mechanism login not available > > > > thoughts? > > Many. :-) > > Check your mail log for clues. > > Ensure you have a valid SSL certificate and key. Sendmail is touchy > about permissions on the key file. Try googling for > confDONT_BLAME_SENDMAIL and GroupReadableKeyFile. > > Make sure saslauthd is configured and running. > > Compile your .mc (m4) file with the macros distributed with the > version of sendmail you're actually running. This line suggests you're > not: > > mdw1982.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.7/8.13.8 > > That's a first stab at things to try. I fixed the version mis-match by installing sendmail-cf package and recompiling sendmail.mc. saslauthd is running and conigured according to your specs. So, I'm not sure what's missing. Still googling around and found some things that appear to be missing from the sendmail config, but when I test saslauthd it doesn't appear to be working. testsaslauthd -u username -p mypassword 0: NO "authentication failed" Usually, testsaslauthd needs a service name. In this case, testsaslauthd -u username -p mypassword -s smtp If your password has any characters a shell might misinterpret (*, !, <, >, &, ...), make sure you enclose it in quotation marks. What have you seen in your logs (usually /var/log/maillog on CentOS systems)? If sendmail is having trouble setting up TLS/SSL, it will let you know! You may have to post the entire contents of your sendmail.mc (the m4 file), redacted as necessary to obscure any non-relevant bits that may be sensitive. -- Paul Heinlein <> heinl...@madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox for CentOS
On 03/09/2017 09:01 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 03/09/2017 07:35 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Yamaban wrote: >>> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes >> wrote: >> >>> On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> Johnny Hughes wrote: > I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have >> noticed > that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree >> (45.8) > to > the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left EL5 and > EL6 > at the ESR level (45.8.0-2). > > EL7: > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0461.html > > EL5 and EL6: > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0459.html > > As stated above, I am currently building and testing these, so they > are > not yet released .. just preparing people for the changes. > >> Does anyone know if ESR 52.x will eventually be released for CentOS 6? >> > > I am sure it will, certainly when version 45 goes EOL. > > The variables and content to build it on EL6 are in the current EL7 > SRPM, but the EL5 stuff is (understandably, since it is going EOL soon) > missing. > > What I am not sure of is if EL7 will stay on the Current Release for >> the > next update or if it will shift back to ESR. > Eh?? There is a slight misunderstanding here. The Firefox 52.0 Version is released for BOTH, the normal release >> channel AND the ESR channel. This was done to have one 6 week periode of >> overlapp between the old and the new ESR version, to "ease over" the transistion, as the 52 version insists on GKT3 and gstreamer 1.x normally. (snip) >>> >>> This is the point that worries me. If ESR 52.x requires GTK3, then how >> can >>> it be supported on CentOS 6? >>> >>> >> They will include it and build it as part of firefox. They already >> build and use a new gcc (4.8) and other new things (binutils, yasm) in >> EL6 to build the current firefox there. >> >> I'm sure they will add in things they need and include them in the built >> RPMs as required. >> >> > OK, thanks for reassuring me! :) > For the record, I just checked and the released SRPM for EL7 has the proper variables and sources and actually builds on EL6. It uses gtk2 from el6 to build. They obviously felt more comfortable instead released the older one on EL6 this cycle, but I suspect that the newer 52.x ESR version will be released during the next cycle. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox for CentOS
On 03/09/2017 05:46 AM, James Pearson wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >> What I am not sure of is if EL7 will stay on the Current Release for the >> next update or if it will shift back to ESR. > > Not quite sure what you mean - the current EL7 firefox 52.0 uses the > Mozilla Firefox 52.0 ESR source ... Right .. Mozilla released 52.0 as ESR and Mainline at the same time. I didn't realize they did it that way. Red Hat moved EL7 to 52.0 and kept EL6 and EL5 back at 45.8.0 .. both are now active ESR releases by Mozilla. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox for CentOS
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/09/2017 07:35 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Yamaban wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> > >>> On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > >>> > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes > wrote: > > > On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > > >> Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> > >>> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have > noticed > >>> that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree > (45.8) > >>> to > >>> the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left EL5 and > >>> EL6 > >>> at the ESR level (45.8.0-2). > >>> > >>> EL7: > >>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0461.html > >>> > >>> EL5 and EL6: > >>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0459.html > >>> > >>> As stated above, I am currently building and testing these, so they > >>> are > >>> not yet released .. just preparing people for the changes. > >>> > >> > Does anyone know if ESR 52.x will eventually be released for CentOS 6? > > >>> > >>> I am sure it will, certainly when version 45 goes EOL. > >>> > >>> The variables and content to build it on EL6 are in the current EL7 > >>> SRPM, but the EL5 stuff is (understandably, since it is going EOL soon) > >>> missing. > >>> > >>> What I am not sure of is if EL7 will stay on the Current Release for > the > >>> next update or if it will shift back to ESR. > >>> > >> > >> Eh?? There is a slight misunderstanding here. > >> > >> The Firefox 52.0 Version is released for BOTH, the normal release > channel > >> AND the ESR channel. This was done to have one 6 week periode of > overlapp > >> between the old and the new ESR version, to "ease over" the transistion, > >> as the 52 version insists on GKT3 and gstreamer 1.x normally. > >> > >> (snip) > > > > This is the point that worries me. If ESR 52.x requires GTK3, then how > can > > it be supported on CentOS 6? > > > > > They will include it and build it as part of firefox. They already > build and use a new gcc (4.8) and other new things (binutils, yasm) in > EL6 to build the current firefox there. > > I'm sure they will add in things they need and include them in the built > RPMs as required. > > OK, thanks for reassuring me! :) -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox for CentOS
On 03/09/2017 07:35 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Yamaban wrote: > >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >>> On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >>> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed >>> that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) >>> to >>> the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left EL5 and >>> EL6 >>> at the ESR level (45.8.0-2). >>> >>> EL7: >>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0461.html >>> >>> EL5 and EL6: >>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0459.html >>> >>> As stated above, I am currently building and testing these, so they >>> are >>> not yet released .. just preparing people for the changes. >>> >> Does anyone know if ESR 52.x will eventually be released for CentOS 6? >>> >>> I am sure it will, certainly when version 45 goes EOL. >>> >>> The variables and content to build it on EL6 are in the current EL7 >>> SRPM, but the EL5 stuff is (understandably, since it is going EOL soon) >>> missing. >>> >>> What I am not sure of is if EL7 will stay on the Current Release for the >>> next update or if it will shift back to ESR. >>> >> >> Eh?? There is a slight misunderstanding here. >> >> The Firefox 52.0 Version is released for BOTH, the normal release channel >> AND the ESR channel. This was done to have one 6 week periode of overlapp >> between the old and the new ESR version, to "ease over" the transistion, >> as the 52 version insists on GKT3 and gstreamer 1.x normally. >> >> (snip) > > This is the point that worries me. If ESR 52.x requires GTK3, then how can > it be supported on CentOS 6? > > They will include it and build it as part of firefox. They already build and use a new gcc (4.8) and other new things (binutils, yasm) in EL6 to build the current firefox there. I'm sure they will add in things they need and include them in the built RPMs as required. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.8 fsck report Maximal Count
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, James B. Byrne wrote: This indicated that a bad sector on the underlying disk system might be the source of the problem. The guests were all shutdown, a /forcefsck file was created on the host system, and the host system remotely restarted. fsck's not good at finding disk errors, it finds filesystem errors. If it was a real disk issue, you'd expect matching errors in the host logs. Did you? /var/log/messages:Mar 9 08:34:48 vhost03 kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-6): warning: maximal mount count reached, running e2fsck is recommended Unmount it and run fsck on it, and that message would go away. But I'd not worry about that one. jh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-6.8 fsck report Maximal Count
We have a remote warm standby system running CentOS-6.8 as a KVM system with multiple guests. One of the guests began reporting an error when running aide. Caught SIGBUS/SEGV while mmapping. File was truncated while aide was running? Caught SIGBUS/SEGV. Exiting The /var/log/messages file contained this: Mar 9 09:14:13 inet12 kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 14539264 Mar 9 09:14:31 inet12 kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 14539296 Mar 9 09:14:48 inet12 kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 14539296 df Filesystem 1K-blocksUsed Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg_inet02-lv_root 7932336 2262672 5260064 31% / tmpfs 961044 0961044 0% /dev/shm /dev/vda1 487652 139473322579 31% /boot . . . This indicated that a bad sector on the underlying disk system might be the source of the problem. The guests were all shutdown, a /forcefsck file was created on the host system, and the host system remotely restarted. However, this action did not remove the error. The host system log files had this to say about fsck: /var/log/messages:Mar 9 08:34:48 vhost03 kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-6): warning: maximal mount count reached, running e2fsck is recommended in /dev I see this: brw-rw. 1 root disk253, 6 Mar 9 08:34 dm-6 But, this device has nothing whatsoever to do with the kvm guests: ll /dev/vg_vhost03/ | grep dm-6 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 7 Mar 9 08:34 lv_centos_repos -> ../dm-6 Rather this is an lv devoted to holding CentOS ISOs: /dev/mapper/vg_vhost03-lv_centos_repos 101016992 77160124 18718848 81% /var/data/centos So, my questions are: 1. How do I fix the problem with the guest system that Aide is stumbling over? 2. How do I get the fsck issue with dm-6 resolved? -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox for CentOS
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Yamaban wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes >>> wrote: >>> On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> I am currently building the latest Firefox updates and I have noticed >> that they have upgraded the CentOS-7 Firefox from the ESR tree (45.8) >> to >> the mainline tree (Currently firefox-52.0). They have left EL5 and >> EL6 >> at the ESR level (45.8.0-2). >> >> EL7: >> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0461.html >> >> EL5 and EL6: >> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0459.html >> >> As stated above, I am currently building and testing these, so they >> are >> not yet released .. just preparing people for the changes. >> > >>> Does anyone know if ESR 52.x will eventually be released for CentOS 6? >>> >> >> I am sure it will, certainly when version 45 goes EOL. >> >> The variables and content to build it on EL6 are in the current EL7 >> SRPM, but the EL5 stuff is (understandably, since it is going EOL soon) >> missing. >> >> What I am not sure of is if EL7 will stay on the Current Release for the >> next update or if it will shift back to ESR. >> > > Eh?? There is a slight misunderstanding here. > > The Firefox 52.0 Version is released for BOTH, the normal release channel > AND the ESR channel. This was done to have one 6 week periode of overlapp > between the old and the new ESR version, to "ease over" the transistion, > as the 52 version insists on GKT3 and gstreamer 1.x normally. > > (snip) This is the point that worries me. If ESR 52.x requires GTK3, then how can it be supported on CentOS 6? -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth
Am 2017-03-09 13:39, schrieb Alexander Dalloz: Am 2017-03-09 02:20, schrieb Mark Weaver: [ ... ] Still googling around and found some things that appear to be missing from the sendmail config, but when I test saslauthd it doesn't appear to be working. testsaslauthd -u username -p mypassword 0: NO "authentication failed" How is your saslauthd configured? Which backend does it use? For debugging purposes it is helpful not to start saslauthd as a service but to run it with parameter -d to see its output on stdout. Alexander Btw. the cyrus-sasl man pages are nicely published here: https://sys4.de/de/blog/tags/cyrus%20sasl/ Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth
Am 2017-03-09 02:20, schrieb Mark Weaver: [ ... ] Still googling around and found some things that appear to be missing from the sendmail config, but when I test saslauthd it doesn't appear to be working. testsaslauthd -u username -p mypassword 0: NO "authentication failed" How is your saslauthd configured? Which backend does it use? For debugging purposes it is helpful not to start saslauthd as a service but to run it with parameter -d to see its output on stdout. Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Up to date guide/information Sendmail SMTP Auth
Am 2017-03-09 00:41, schrieb Mark Weaver: [ ... ] And now? telnet merlin 25 Trying 10.10.3.6... Connected to merlin.ciss.local. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mdw1982.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.7/8.14.7; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:39:51 -0500 ehlo merlin 250-mdw1982.com Hello [10.10.3.102], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 250-DSN 250-ETRN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP auth login 504 5.3.3 AUTH mechanism login not available Mark, which cyrus-sasl packages did you install? What's your precise Sendmail configuration in sendmail.mc? Please provide too your /etc/sasl2/Sendmail.conf as well your saslauthd configuration if you make use of it. Alexander P.S. This is a mailing list, so please strip your replies as it is not necessary to quote a hole previous mail. Just keep the context to which your reply. Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] another SMTP auth question
Am 2017-03-09 01:15, schrieb Fred Smith: My ISP has just informed me that we will soon be required to authenticate when connecting to their smtp server, so I've been looking around on the web for how to do that with sendmail (just using auth when connecting outward-bound, nothing else). I've found a page here: http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/auth.html that explains it simply (for simple minds, like mine) but it appears to be old-ish. So, I'm wondering if the recommendation of using: define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS', `EXTERNAL GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN')dnl is still appropriate, since MD5 is known to be breakable. Are there other hash mechanisms that can be used in SMTP for this purpose? DIGEST-MD5 and CRAM-MD5 are shared secret mechanisms. Not the password or it's hash is transported over the wire. Also, if someone can help me understand the syntax, I'd appreciate it: does EXTERNAL mean some external tool not specified here? if so, how is it specified? what such tools would be appropriate? EXTERNAL means a lower layer is being used is there something more robust, e.g., sha256 or similar that should be used here instead? No. You can make use of what got implemented by cyrus-sasl. is GSSAPI internal, or does the external mean EXTERNAL GSSAPI? GSSAPI is kerberos. No, EXTERNAL and GSSAPI are 2 mechanisms. Thanks in advance for any tips. See https://www.cyrusimap.org/docs/cyrus-sasl/2.1.25/ Fred Only offer or use those mechanisms the partner side can deal with. PLAIN over a forcefully TLS secured connection is safe and a defacto standard. Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 145, Issue 4
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2017:0454 Important CentOS 5 kvm SecurityUpdate
(Johnny Hughes)
2. CESA-2017:0459 Critical CentOS 5 firefox Security Update
(Johnny Hughes)
3. CESA-2017:0459 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update
(Johnny Hughes)
4. CEBA-2017:0472 CentOS 5 tzdata BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
5. CEBA-2017:0472 CentOS 6 tzdata BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
6. CEEA-2017:0458 CentOS 7 kmod-redhat-mpt3sas Enhancement
Update (Johnny Hughes)
7. CEEA-2017:0460 CentOS 7 nspr Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes)
8. CEEA-2017:0460 CentOS 7 nss-util Enhancement Update
(Johnny Hughes)
9. CEEA-2017:0460 CentOS 7 nss Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes)
10. CESA-2017:0461 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update
(Johnny Hughes)
11. CEBA-2017:0472 CentOS 7 tzdata BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:33:47 +
From: Johnny Hughes
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:0454 Important CentOS 5 kvm
SecurityUpdate
Message-ID: <20170308183347.ga13...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:0454 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0454.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
0e34501fb214585a504064e6aa4e92d8c6324981104fd7a29edc6f918e5cb238
kmod-kvm-83-277.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
9ed56a631d250bbda7b31e4a1df28387709f816b5974aa87ab522774273e480c
kmod-kvm-debug-83-277.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
38ddb0118eabc062c89dd5353b3da9f4574d4d03c3bb5dba677200cb5522fcb7
kvm-83-277.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
c96ade4c2185dd18a78fcf51c74fe7a7a916de7e45e339975ba14ec5d394928b
kvm-qemu-img-83-277.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
02aed4ba713b572ba9745a568289cb5c48b30b3f94f512a69b77c51bfc532a00
kvm-tools-83-277.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
125954ae9f9608b901902f81b2d144fbef70efff0e11a761787324457034832d
kvm-83-277.el5.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: JohnnyCentOS
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:38:57 +
From: Johnny Hughes
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:0459 Critical CentOS 5 firefox
SecurityUpdate
Message-ID: <20170308183857.ga13...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:0459 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0459.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
a34545c9cf03031487401a126491ebd9b070d5ae4939388b5257c0247934edbb
firefox-45.8.0-2.el5.centos.i386.rpm
x86_64:
a34545c9cf03031487401a126491ebd9b070d5ae4939388b5257c0247934edbb
firefox-45.8.0-2.el5.centos.i386.rpm
68ced987cc2f967a4d8034f1bce8cd63a8ef8a3213cd20d65b66a18a1ca00977
firefox-45.8.0-2.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
05f28d258f433afa408773c4cac5d3a96058a6e9e25b4991c2e90764335f89e1
firefox-45.8.0-2.el5.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: JohnnyCentOS
--
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:42:41 +
From: Johnny Hughes
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:0459 Critical CentOS 6 firefox
SecurityUpdate
Message-ID: <20170308184241.ga61...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:0459 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0459.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
4bec161eb52a589439c71ed05b1cec02090238945f06c5842c46131c1afdb1aa
firefox-45.8.0-2.el6.centos.i686.rpm
x86_64:
4bec161eb52a589439c71ed05b1cec02090238945f06c5842c46131c1afdb1aa
firefox-45.8.0-2.el6.centos.i686.rpm
5419e8f6cd70aaf324f787f935578562ecb86ffc853fd770a850f87050b7e928
firefox-45.8.0-2.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
d9df8316ea7d9e8656a6a2b5b08270d79726ab2be1959a4fd8cf787bb4a3f4a8
firefox-45.8.0-2.el6.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://ww
Re: [CentOS] Firefox for CentOS
Johnny Hughes wrote: > > What I am not sure of is if EL7 will stay on the Current Release for the > next update or if it will shift back to ESR. Not quite sure what you mean - the current EL7 firefox 52.0 uses the Mozilla Firefox 52.0 ESR source ... James Pearson ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files
On 09/03/17 09:28, John Hodrien wrote: I'll obviously argue I wasn't scaremongering. You can start with CentOS, and do anything you like with it, and as I've said, you're absolutely free to do that. But at some point, you have to accept that what you've got left isn't CentOS. If you don't use what the distribution provides, what you're doing isn't the distribution. Given you're getting no formal support on this, that possibly means little to you, but don't be surprised by the community backing away from providing unofficial support to something that's no longer CentOS. You see this sort of thing in a more extreme way with things like cPanel. Well, let's put it this way, the more someone argues that I need to run some software that I clearly don't need, the more I become suspicious of what that software is doing. The network configuration of my servers is static, it doesn't need to be changed once the server has booted up. So it doesn't need some piece of software running away doing goodness knows what... I'm just going to be waiting for it to bug or error out and leave me high and dry without a network config. I am not trying to suggest of encourage people to emulate what I have done, I have just been making a point that if you want to run something to manage your network configuration, and your network configuration is clearly not going to change, then it might be simpler to hardcode that configuration. In any case, two alternatives have come out of this thread, the networkd alternative, and the configure-and-exit parameter to NetworkManager. I think it best we leave this thread to die, and accept that others will not always do things your way and/or the Redhat/Centos way, but go on their own path, and they will probably be happy to accept that this is their own creation and the risks associated with that (no support / unknown behaviour in certain circumstances etc...). Their creation may address things that NetworkManager doesn't do in the future, and if adopted everyone will benefit. Is this the Catherdral or the Bazaar? -- Regards, Giles Coochey +44 (0) 7584 634 135 +44 (0) 1803 529 451 gi...@coochey.net ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, isdtor wrote: Did I see an implicit "do as Red Hat says or else" there somewhere? Not appropriate. Linux is not Windows (yet). In the heat of the moment it may easily be forgotton that Linux is all about choice. We choose to run CentOS, and we choose to run it the way we see fit. We appreciate the efforts that go into the *Community* *Enterprise* OS, and if you have dealt with buggy crap like Ubuntu or Fedora, you appreciate it even more. This does not imply deference to upstream. That statement about "effectively [running] your own Linux distribution" is scaremongering, at best. If there's one thing I've learned on this list, it's realizing how many use cases, scenarios and solutions there are that can make approaching the topic at hand without prejudice challenging at times. I'll obviously argue I wasn't scaremongering. You can start with CentOS, and do anything you like with it, and as I've said, you're absolutely free to do that. But at some point, you have to accept that what you've got left isn't CentOS. If you don't use what the distribution provides, what you're doing isn't the distribution. Given you're getting no formal support on this, that possibly means little to you, but don't be surprised by the community backing away from providing unofficial support to something that's no longer CentOS. You see this sort of thing in a more extreme way with things like cPanel. jh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files
On 9 March 2017 at 00:54, isdtor wrote: > Did I see an implicit "do as Red Hat says or else" there somewhere? Not > appropriate. Linux is not Windows (yet). In the heat of the moment it may > easily be forgotton that Linux is all about choice. We choose to run CentOS, > and we choose to run it the way we see fit. We appreciate the efforts that go > into the *Community* *Enterprise* OS, and if you have dealt with buggy crap > like Ubuntu or Fedora, you appreciate it even more. This does not imply > deference to upstream. > > That statement about "effectively [running] your own Linux distribution" is > scaremongering, at best. If there's one thing I've learned on this list, it's > realizing how many use cases, scenarios and solutions there are that can make > approaching the topic at hand without prejudice challenging at times. > You're reaching here. It's simply there is good advice and sane management practices, and there's bad advice and approaches to manage systems that have plenty of clear issues and step way outside of the documented and supported methods of handling things. If you want to use a random script that has so many issues it's even less supportable than the legacy network service, more power to you! Just don't advise people entering into this area to do that and don't expect much help from those more knowledgeable in those areas who spend their own time assisting on the mailing list and IRC if you insist on jumping off the cliff with your homemade parachute after people have pointed out that patching it with small bits of cloth wasn't the best of ideas ... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
