Re: [CentOS-virt] CentOS virt-sig Linux kernel 4.9.155 build
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 2:07 PM Karl Johnson wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 4:43 AM Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:21:01PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >> > > >> > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:22:19PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > I updated my PR: [3] >> https://github.com/CentOS-virt7/xen-kernel/pull/18 >> > > > >> > > > Hi Karl, I've build and tested your PR, but without the GCC7 >> patch, and >> > > > when I've tested it on el6, none of the guests had network >> access. >> > > > I had to revert the bridge changes to have them working >> > > > (CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER=m and CONFIG_BRIDGE=m). >> > > > >> > > > Why did you want the BRIDGE built-in instead of a module? >> > > > >> > > > Maybe you have something to setup the bridge (probably filter) >> properly, >> > > > or maybe something is different in the xen package between el6 >> and el7. >> > > > Any idea? >> > > > >> > > > I still have to investigate the Xen pkg, and have a closer >> look at those >> > > > tests I'm running. >> > > > >> > > >Hum strange. I switched from module to built-in because I always >> had a >> > > >deprecated warning about bridge when booting CentOS 6 (and I >> guess >> > > >everyone needs bridge?). I don't remember what was the exact >> warning >> > > >because it's been a long time since I switched it. I don't mind >> to put it >> > > >back as a module, both works for me but the warning is gone when >> built-in. >> > > >> > > Yeah better to keep things as modules, like they have been. >> > > >> > > btw upstream Linux 4.9 LTS kernel is now at 4.9.162 :) >> > > >> > >> > I suggest we: >> > >> > 1) Rebase to linux 4.9.162. >> > 2) Drop the "set bridge to built-in instead of module" changes. Let's >> keep those settings like they were earlier. >> > 3) Drop the use of gcc7 for now. >> > >> > How does that sound? >> > >> >> Karl: Would you like to update the github PR ? Or should someone else >> pick up the kernel update work? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- Pasi >> >> >> > Sure, I will update the PR in the next few days. > > Karl > I've updated my PR and tested a build, it boots well: [root@node-tmp1 ~]# cat /proc/version Linux version 4.9.165-35.el6.x86_64 (mockbu...@build.aerisnetwork.net) (gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-23) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Sat Mar 23 14:44:16 EDT 2019 Test rpms: https://repo.aerisnetwork.com/archive/ Anthony will be able to build it on the CBS as devtoolset has been removed from the spec. Karl ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 - AltArch i386 - DVD iso?
On 3/23/19 10:06 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: I don’t do unmanaged installs that often, but last I tried, if you boot off and install from a CD/DVD it doesn’t bring up the network by default. That sounds consistent with what I saw. I don't think there's any reason to call out the Minimal ISO as being deficient or defective in any way (as mark did). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-virt] CentOS virt-sig Linux kernel 4.9.155 build
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 4:43 AM Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:21:01PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:22:19PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I updated my PR: [3] > https://github.com/CentOS-virt7/xen-kernel/pull/18 > > > > > > > > Hi Karl, I've build and tested your PR, but without the GCC7 > patch, and > > > > when I've tested it on el6, none of the guests had network > access. > > > > I had to revert the bridge changes to have them working > > > > (CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER=m and CONFIG_BRIDGE=m). > > > > > > > > Why did you want the BRIDGE built-in instead of a module? > > > > > > > > Maybe you have something to setup the bridge (probably filter) > properly, > > > > or maybe something is different in the xen package between el6 > and el7. > > > > Any idea? > > > > > > > > I still have to investigate the Xen pkg, and have a closer look > at those > > > > tests I'm running. > > > > > > > >Hum strange. I switched from module to built-in because I always > had a > > > >deprecated warning about bridge when booting CentOS 6 (and I guess > > > >everyone needs bridge?). I don't remember what was the exact > warning > > > >because it's been a long time since I switched it. I don't mind > to put it > > > >back as a module, both works for me but the warning is gone when > built-in. > > > > > > Yeah better to keep things as modules, like they have been. > > > > > > btw upstream Linux 4.9 LTS kernel is now at 4.9.162 :) > > > > > > > I suggest we: > > > > 1) Rebase to linux 4.9.162. > > 2) Drop the "set bridge to built-in instead of module" changes. Let's > keep those settings like they were earlier. > > 3) Drop the use of gcc7 for now. > > > > How does that sound? > > > > Karl: Would you like to update the github PR ? Or should someone else pick > up the kernel update work? > > > Thanks, > > -- Pasi > > > Sure, I will update the PR in the next few days. Karl ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 - AltArch i386 - DVD iso?
On Mar 22, 2019, at 4:30 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > Is that different from the standard install? Does that one activate > interfaces regardless? I don’t do unmanaged installs that often, but last I tried, if you boot off and install from a CD/DVD it doesn’t bring up the network by default. If you boot off the network (or use the virt-install -l URL method) it brings up a network, since it obviously is installing off the same network. -- Jonathan Billings ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] http error when updating 7.5 ==> 7.6
> On Mar 22, 2019, at 9:52 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > Was just doing a (very) belated update on a 7.5 system and ran into > this set of errors: > > Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying.. > > > so, anybody know why we're getting the 416 error from yum but not from > firefox? > Hi Fred, Ran into this yesterday. It seems to be a delta rpm problem. Firefox is working because it’s downloading the whole rpm, avoiding the issue. setting deltarpm=0 in /etc/yum.conf is an equivalent workaround, and fixed the issue for me. I’d appreciate someone who knows more about how delta rpms work weighing in on what the actual issue is. Bez Thomas Tech Services, Astronomy/CCAPS Cornell University ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 169, Issue 6
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2019:0623 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update
(Johnny Hughes)
2. CESA-2019:0622 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update
(Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:50:10 +
From: Johnny Hughes
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2019:0623 Critical CentOS 6 firefox
SecurityUpdate
Message-ID: <20190322135010.ga8...@bstore1.rdu2.centos.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:0623 Critical
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0623
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
90ecdbff9c59846eba27ea0639c06c2e49bc42a22d1b163ecc344b3b32cd1c5a
firefox-60.6.0-3.el6.centos.i686.rpm
x86_64:
90ecdbff9c59846eba27ea0639c06c2e49bc42a22d1b163ecc344b3b32cd1c5a
firefox-60.6.0-3.el6.centos.i686.rpm
0db0e7abf3b5f22a4d5f6795c46801f46caec7cae8bcb03875a29de0f171c0ca
firefox-60.6.0-3.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
755c2ec68e20acf81102a1af307545795620b6b8508f703a5fcd82d679ccdea8
firefox-60.6.0-3.el6.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:54:23 +
From: Johnny Hughes
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2019:0622 Critical CentOS 7 firefox
SecurityUpdate
Message-ID: <20190322135423.ga9...@bstore1.rdu2.centos.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:0622 Critical
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0622
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
064bf5f1d2922d5bde8c56499aa6cf44d5f2b69ed0b4caf7a656fa98e6ccbae9
firefox-60.6.0-3.el7.centos.i686.rpm
7355e00a6bcdf41291c388dd9d59b4d785b1d546a2be9cf35a593eafa6d858ca
firefox-60.6.0-3.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
cafd3da67a81d0f7376884bcc41d9b4362fd6e45f75d67744e702dae02f4c5a5
firefox-60.6.0-3.el7.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
--
Subject: Digest Footer
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
--
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 169, Issue 6
***
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
