[CentOS] upgrade to kernel 4.19.43 fail.
Hi all... I just upgraded to laatest kernel in experimental from 4.19.40 , and for my OpenCL app this now fails with this msg: amdgpu_device_initialize: DRM version is 2.50.0 but this driver is only compatible with 3.x.x. Booting back to 4.19.40 makes it work again. I have added a few files from amdgpu-pro package, to make openCL work here in centos7; but something must have changed in this new kernel for amdgpu support. As kernel 4.19.40 works fine, it is not a big issue here - just wanted to report it. Allan. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UEFI boot manager sequence problems HP Envy
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:29:39PM +0100, Gary Stainburn wrote: > I then wiped all the Linux partitions and did a clean C7 install > using the latest ISO, all went well, but when it reboot it went > straight into Windows. Using F9 on reboot I chose CentOS Linux and > the new system booted. Using efibootmgr I reset the boot sequence > and all looked fine (see below). > > Unfortunately, when I then reboot it reverts to booting > Windows. Using F9 to get back into Linux then shows that the boot > sequence has reverted. This means that the updated sequence either > was not stored properly, or something is resetting it. I suggest running 'blkid' and 'efibootmgr -v', and double-check that the UUID for the CentOS boot entry matches the UUID of the EFI disk. You can delete and recreate the boot entry with 'efibootmgr', which will likely solve the problem. It depends on the UEFI implementation, but when all the boot entries are wrong (UUID changed due to new disk) sometimes it has a fallback to find the Windows bootloader and choose it. -- Jonathan Billings ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] multilib problem during "yum update"
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 02:14:42AM +, Ian Mortimer wrote: > On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 14:05 +1000, Bill Maidment wrote: > > > > ---> Package libgpg-error.x86_64 0:1.13-1.el7.centos will be an > > > update > > > ---> Package libgpg-error-debuginfo.x86_64 0:1.13-1.el7.centos will > > > be an update > > > ---> Package libgpg-error-devel.x86_64 0:1.13-1.el7.centos will be > > > an update > > > > The update for libgpg-error.i686 1.13-1 seems to be missing > > Where are the libgpg-error 1.13-1.el7.centos packages coming > from? They're not in CentOS updates (or RHEL updates either). bugzy-keepassxc and disabling it solves the problem. I'm using the priority plugin, so apparently I didn't choose a correct value for the bugzy repopriority. If I have more troubles, in the future, from having disabled it, I'll do a closer study of the priorities. thanks for the rap on the head! Fred -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - "For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen." - Jude 1:24,25 (niv) - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox addons disabled - temporary fix
On 05/05/2019 22:21, wwp wrote: > Hello Frank, > > > On Sat, 4 May 2019 11:09:22 -0600 Frank Cox wrote: > >> The currently available fix for Firefox doesn't work with ESR, but there's a >> temporary fix that works. At least, it's working for me: >> >> Go to about:config and set xpinstall.signatures.required to false. > [snip] > > And extensions.langpacks.signatures.required for language packs. > > > Regards, > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Does anyone know what the latest on this is? Specifically can I reset the xpinstall.signatures.required? My machine is running C7 patched today. -- J Martin Rushton MBCS signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] how to change all hardware and system-IDs
Hallo, has anyone a hint how to change all device-IDs in a cloned Centos-VM. I cloned a system 4 times with the vmware-converter but didn t realize that hardware-IDs etc. were not changed. Using a live-cd is possible. Thanks for hints Ralf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Remaster CentOS from source
I read that (and the one for CentOS 7). I was curious if there was any more in-depth information on how to create a working environment? Thank you again. On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 9:02 AM Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > > > > Am 28.05.2019 um 14:59 schrieb Jeremy Hendricks : > > > > Hello, > > > > I was curious if there were any documentation available on how to > > remaster CentOS from srpms (as in to recreate the process from RHEL > > srpms) to create a derivative distro. This is only for educational > > purposes to better understand the process. > > High level : https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8 > > -- > LF > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UEFI boot manager sequence problems HP Envy
On Tuesday 28 May 2019 13:30:44 Günther J. Niederwimmer wrote: > Hello, > > change the bootorder > > BootOrder: 0002,3002,,0003,0004,0005,2001,2002,2003 > your first boot is windows > I know, that's my problem. If you look further down the OP I successfully change the boot sequence, but it doesn't stay that way ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Older versions of samba that work with CentOS 7?
On Tue, 28 May 2019, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 12:43:41PM +0200, Miroslav Geisselreiter (m...@intar.cz) wrote: Hi Jobst, you can use latest samba package from CentOS 7 - there is no problem with NT style domains support (ie. it supports NT style domains). We use servers with CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 both with NT style domains. Phew! Thank you, this is great news! I had huge trouble to get the samba server started after I ported it onto a CentOS 7 machine. I tried to start it with systemctl start smbd nmbd winbind samba and it failed without error messages. So I has asked a question on the Samba mailing list. They told me I should do this as systemctl stop smbd nmbd winbind samba systemctl disable smbd nmbd winbind samba systemctl mask smbd nmbd winbind samba systemctl unmask samba-ad-dc systemctl enable samba-ad-dc systemctl start samba-ad-dc Can you confirm, you start this with systemctl start samba-ad-dc RHEL and therefore Centos does not support a samba ad-dc. You either have to find 3rd party rpms or build from source. IIRC, Your initial request was for nt pdc support. They are totally different animals and might work with the rpms provided by Centos. Various people over on the samba list have found it painful to keep NT domains working with the latest versions of windows. Having said that, your best bet is to bits the bullet and upgrade to AD. NT domains have been obsoleted by Ms for more than 10 years. Samba AD works just fine on Centos 7 if you build it yourself or find workable 3rd party rpms. Regards, -- Tom m...@tdiehl.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Remaster CentOS from source
> Am 28.05.2019 um 14:59 schrieb Jeremy Hendricks : > > Hello, > > I was curious if there were any documentation available on how to > remaster CentOS from srpms (as in to recreate the process from RHEL > srpms) to create a derivative distro. This is only for educational > purposes to better understand the process. High level : https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8 -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Remaster CentOS from source
Hello, I was curious if there were any documentation available on how to remaster CentOS from srpms (as in to recreate the process from RHEL srpms) to create a derivative distro. This is only for educational purposes to better understand the process. Thank you for your time. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UEFI boot manager sequence problems HP Envy
Hello, change the bootorder > BootOrder: 0002,3002,,0003,0004,0005,2001,2002,2003 your first boot is windows Am Dienstag, 28. Mai 2019, 13:29:39 CEST schrieb Gary Stainburn: > Morning all, > > I have a HP Envy dual boot system (Win8 for serious stuff, i.e. Train Sim > and Flight Sim) and Centos 7 for everything else. > > In the past I've had the occasional problem where an update on the windows > side has updated the UEFI boot sequence but using efibootmgr has always > fixed it. > > On Friday I discovered that my HDD was failing so I tried using Clonezilla > to move it on to a new SSD of the same size. Unfortunately the clone > didn't work, failing half way through my main partition. Thankfully the > Windows partitions and boot info cloned across so that side of the system > worked. > > I then wiped all the Linux partitions and did a clean C7 install using the > latest ISO, all went well, but when it reboot it went straight into > Windows. Using F9 on reboot I chose CentOS Linux and the new system > booted. Using efibootmgr I reset the boot sequence and all looked fine > (see below). > > Unfortunately, when I then reboot it reverts to booting Windows. Using F9 to > get back into Linux then shows that the boot sequence has reverted. This > means that the updated sequence either was not stored properly, or > something is resetting it. > > Legacy support in the BIOS is turned off as it should be, and the boot > sequence in the BIOS only has a limited number of options. The sequence in > the BIOS is: > > UEFI Boot Order > USB Diskette on Key/USB Hard Drive > OS boot Manager(shown in white) > Internal CD/DVD ROM Drive > USB CD/DVD ROM Drive > ! Network Adapter > > Legacy Boot Order > Notebook Hard Drive > Internal CD/DVD ROM Drive > USB Diskette on Key/USB Hard Drive > USB CD/DVD ROM Drive > ! Network Adapter > > If I press I get the same options as in efibootmgr but the first option > "Windows Boot Manager" is selected. > > > > [root@gary ~]# efibootmgr > BootCurrent: 0004 > Timeout: 0 seconds > BootOrder: 0002,3002,,0003,0004,0005,2001,2002,2003 > Boot* Linux > Boot0002* Windows Boot Manager > Boot0003* Fedora > Boot0004* CentOS Linux > Boot0005* CentOS > Boot2001* USB Drive (UEFI) > Boot2002* Internal CD/DVD ROM Drive (UEFI) > Boot3000* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk > Boot3002* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk > Boot3004* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk > [root@gary ~]# efibootmgr -o 0004,2001,2002,3000 > BootCurrent: 0004 > Timeout: 0 seconds > BootOrder: 0004,2001,2002,3000 > Boot* Linux > Boot0002* Windows Boot Manager > Boot0003* Fedora > Boot0004* CentOS Linux > Boot0005* CentOS > Boot2001* USB Drive (UEFI) > Boot2002* Internal CD/DVD ROM Drive (UEFI) > Boot3000* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk > Boot3002* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk > Boot3004* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk > [root@gary ~]# efibootmgr > BootCurrent: 0004 > Timeout: 0 seconds > BootOrder: 0004,2001,2002,3000 > Boot* Linux > Boot0002* Windows Boot Manager > Boot0003* Fedora > Boot0004* CentOS Linux > Boot0005* CentOS > Boot2001* USB Drive (UEFI) > Boot2002* Internal CD/DVD ROM Drive (UEFI) > Boot3000* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk > Boot3002* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk > Boot3004* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk > [root@gary ~]# > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- mit freundliche Grüßen / best regards, Günther J. Niederwimmer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] UEFI boot manager sequence problems HP Envy
Morning all, I have a HP Envy dual boot system (Win8 for serious stuff, i.e. Train Sim and Flight Sim) and Centos 7 for everything else. In the past I've had the occasional problem where an update on the windows side has updated the UEFI boot sequence but using efibootmgr has always fixed it. On Friday I discovered that my HDD was failing so I tried using Clonezilla to move it on to a new SSD of the same size. Unfortunately the clone didn't work, failing half way through my main partition. Thankfully the Windows partitions and boot info cloned across so that side of the system worked. I then wiped all the Linux partitions and did a clean C7 install using the latest ISO, all went well, but when it reboot it went straight into Windows. Using F9 on reboot I chose CentOS Linux and the new system booted. Using efibootmgr I reset the boot sequence and all looked fine (see below). Unfortunately, when I then reboot it reverts to booting Windows. Using F9 to get back into Linux then shows that the boot sequence has reverted. This means that the updated sequence either was not stored properly, or something is resetting it. Legacy support in the BIOS is turned off as it should be, and the boot sequence in the BIOS only has a limited number of options. The sequence in the BIOS is: UEFI Boot Order USB Diskette on Key/USB Hard Drive OS boot Manager(shown in white) Internal CD/DVD ROM Drive USB CD/DVD ROM Drive ! Network Adapter Legacy Boot Order Notebook Hard Drive Internal CD/DVD ROM Drive USB Diskette on Key/USB Hard Drive USB CD/DVD ROM Drive ! Network Adapter If I press I get the same options as in efibootmgr but the first option "Windows Boot Manager" is selected. [root@gary ~]# efibootmgr BootCurrent: 0004 Timeout: 0 seconds BootOrder: 0002,3002,,0003,0004,0005,2001,2002,2003 Boot* Linux Boot0002* Windows Boot Manager Boot0003* Fedora Boot0004* CentOS Linux Boot0005* CentOS Boot2001* USB Drive (UEFI) Boot2002* Internal CD/DVD ROM Drive (UEFI) Boot3000* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk Boot3002* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk Boot3004* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk [root@gary ~]# efibootmgr -o 0004,2001,2002,3000 BootCurrent: 0004 Timeout: 0 seconds BootOrder: 0004,2001,2002,3000 Boot* Linux Boot0002* Windows Boot Manager Boot0003* Fedora Boot0004* CentOS Linux Boot0005* CentOS Boot2001* USB Drive (UEFI) Boot2002* Internal CD/DVD ROM Drive (UEFI) Boot3000* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk Boot3002* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk Boot3004* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk [root@gary ~]# efibootmgr BootCurrent: 0004 Timeout: 0 seconds BootOrder: 0004,2001,2002,3000 Boot* Linux Boot0002* Windows Boot Manager Boot0003* Fedora Boot0004* CentOS Linux Boot0005* CentOS Boot2001* USB Drive (UEFI) Boot2002* Internal CD/DVD ROM Drive (UEFI) Boot3000* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk Boot3002* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk Boot3004* Internal Hard Disk or Solid State Disk [root@gary ~]# ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Older versions of samba that work with CentOS 7?
In "my" CentOS 7 there are only services smb and nmb. I do not need winbind. I use samba with ldap and kerberos. So I use: systemctl enable smb nmb systemctl start smb nmb I use standard samba packages comming with CentOS 7: # rpm -qa | grep samba samba-client-libs-4.8.3-4.el7.x86_64 samba-4.8.3-4.el7.x86_64 samba-common-4.8.3-4.el7.noarch samba-common-tools-4.8.3-4.el7.x86_64 samba-common-libs-4.8.3-4.el7.x86_64 samba-libs-4.8.3-4.el7.x86_64 If you have trouble with starting samba there are posibilities to set higher log level and then see what happens. Mirek Dne 28.5.2019 v 3:36 Jobst Schmalenbach napsal(a): On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 12:43:41PM +0200, Miroslav Geisselreiter (m...@intar.cz) wrote: Hi Jobst, you can use latest samba package from CentOS 7 - there is no problem with NT style domains support (ie. it supports NT style domains). We use servers with CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 both with NT style domains. Phew! Thank you, this is great news! I had huge trouble to get the samba server started after I ported it onto a CentOS 7 machine. I tried to start it with systemctl start smbd nmbd winbind samba and it failed without error messages. So I has asked a question on the Samba mailing list. They told me I should do this as systemctl stop smbd nmbd winbind samba systemctl disable smbd nmbd winbind samba systemctl mask smbd nmbd winbind samba systemctl unmask samba-ad-dc systemctl enable samba-ad-dc systemctl start samba-ad-dc Can you confirm, you start this with systemctl start samba-ad-dc thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
