[CentOS] CentOS Net Install
Hey all, Is a Network Install ISO planed any time in the near future for CentOS 8? I don't see it in the mirrors, but that might be a function of my poor searching abilities. -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?
On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 16:44 +, Tony Mountifield wrote: > In article <5c2439dc6351659900b0c7ef421ae3f1e7b84fe4.ca...@biggs.org.uk>, > Pete Biggs wrote: > > > is what is annoying me. That seems to be what I would expect if I > > > piped it to less. I checked a fedora 31 and another centos 8 box and > > > am seeing the same behaviour. Am I missing something? > > > > > > > The environment variable $PAGER determines what pager to use. The > > default is 'less'. User > > > > export PAGER=more > > > > to use 'more' instead. Or > > > > export PAGER= > > > > to not pipe to a pager. > > This would also affect "man". Better to use SYSTEMD_PAGER. > That is probably a beneficial side-effect. P. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS website/blog localization support for IT (italian...) language
Hi, thanks a lo (!) t for your reply. > I'm doing some working to start the Italian translation job (build a glossary > and share some good rules to approach translation task) I've completed this (simple) task, so I'm ready to start the translation jpb and also to spread the voice to Italian LUG to catch other people No news still from the MoinMoin development team (asking them to explain if they have some sort of translation support inside their wiki platform). I will keep you updated > I don't think we track any stats of that nature. No data about our web visitors? It's a precise choice? OK to not track single user, etc but understand from an aggregate point of view: visitors per country, user web browser (and OS) choice, user device (pc/mobile/tablet) > Exactly what's https://planet.centos.org? > Planet Centos is a blog aggregator. However, since we have almost no active > bloggers in our community, it ends up just being a mirror of the main > blog.centos.org site. > A while back I looked around for some active centOS bloggers who were posting > quality content and came up with almost nothing. If you're aware of any, we > can try to get them added on. I can contact some IT blogger (that wrote about Linux and Centos) that I found interesting > If you think there's value in translating these blog posts, I suppose that > would be fine. I'm not sure, though, where we would host that content. I think that this page and the content that it brings is very useful (both from an announce/news update that from a technical perspective) Regards, Andrea Flori aka Fleur ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?
In article <5c2439dc6351659900b0c7ef421ae3f1e7b84fe4.ca...@biggs.org.uk>, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > is what is annoying me. That seems to be what I would expect if I > > piped it to less. I checked a fedora 31 and another centos 8 box and > > am seeing the same behaviour. Am I missing something? > > > > The environment variable $PAGER determines what pager to use. The > default is 'less'. User > > export PAGER=more > > to use 'more' instead. Or > > export PAGER= > > to not pipe to a pager. This would also affect "man". Better to use SYSTEMD_PAGER. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: t...@softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: t...@mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?
In article , Mauricio Tavares wrote: > Comparing the output of systemctl between centos 7 and 8: > > [...] > > So far so good. Don't know why it is complaining about log being > rotated but output looks readable. Now, let's grab a centos8 box: > > [raub@vmhost2 ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS Linux release 8.0.1905 (Core) > [raub@vmhost2 ~]$ systemctl status firewalld > â firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon >Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled; vendor > p> >Active: active (running) since Tue 2019-12-10 20:10:20 EST; 2 days ago > Docs: man:firewalld(1) > Main PID: 1031 (firewalld) > Tasks: 2 (limit: 26213) >Memory: 33.5M >CGroup: /system.slice/firewalld.service >ââ1031 /usr/libexec/platform-python -s /usr/sbin/firewalld > --nofork > > lines 1-9/9 (END) > > As you can see, it is trimming the output at the end of my terminal > window, which I do not care; there are options (-i I think) to make it > wrap around, but the line > > lines 1-9/9 (END) > > is what is annoying me. That seems to be what I would expect if I > piped it to less. I checked a fedora 31 and another centos 8 box and > am seeing the same behaviour. Am I missing something? See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713567 for info. It's more of the systemd-mindset disease, and Schmidt looked to be pretty intransigent in the face of concerted objection some years ago. You either have to use: systemctl --no-pager status firewalld Or you have to first do: export SYSTEMD_PAGER= Maybe you could put the latter into a file in /etc/profile.d to make it system-wide: # echo 'export SYSTEMD_PAGER=' >>/etc/profile.d/systemd.sh # echo 'setenv SYSTEMD_PAGER ""' >>/etc/profile.d/systemd.csh Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: t...@softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: t...@mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?
On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 at 11:40, Warren Young wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2019, at 9:27 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > It seems this became the default at some point. > > > > systemctl -l --no-pager > > > > is the way to get it without that. The whole does it use a pager, does > > it ellipse, etc has been a long fight where various people complain > > enough to get it one way or another. It usually goes with the group > > that complains the nicest versus the ones who complain the worst :). > > You can fix the symptom with the software as delivered: > > $ export SYSTEMD_LESS='-FR' Thanks . I did the alias a long time that I forgot about the line you actually quote in the next email :). -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?
On Dec 13, 2019, at 9:39 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > You can fix the symptom with the software as delivered: Also, there’s this bit in the default .bashrc on EL8: # Uncomment the following line if you don't like systemctl's auto-paging feature: # export SYSTEMD_PAGER= ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?
On Dec 13, 2019, at 9:27 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > It seems this became the default at some point. > > systemctl -l --no-pager > > is the way to get it without that. The whole does it use a pager, does > it ellipse, etc has been a long fight where various people complain > enough to get it one way or another. It usually goes with the group > that complains the nicest versus the ones who complain the worst :). You can fix the symptom with the software as delivered: $ export SYSTEMD_LESS='-FR' ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?
On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 at 11:11, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > > Comparing the output of systemctl between centos 7 and 8: > > [root@mail ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core) > [root@mail ~]# systemctl status firewalld > ● firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon >Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled; > vendor preset: enabled) >Active: active (running) since Fri 2019-10-25 00:24:24 UTC; 1 > months 19 days ago > Docs: man:firewalld(1) > Main PID: 6578 (firewalld) >CGroup: /system.slice/firewalld.service >└─6578 /usr/bin/python2 -Es /usr/sbin/firewalld --nofork --nopid > > Warning: Journal has been rotated since unit was started. Log output > is incomplete or unavailable. > [root@mail ~]# > > So far so good. Don't know why it is complaining about log being > rotated but output looks readable. Now, let's grab a centos8 box: > > [raub@vmhost2 ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS Linux release 8.0.1905 (Core) > [raub@vmhost2 ~]$ systemctl status firewalld > ● firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon >Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled; vendor > p> >Active: active (running) since Tue 2019-12-10 20:10:20 EST; 2 days ago > Docs: man:firewalld(1) > Main PID: 1031 (firewalld) > Tasks: 2 (limit: 26213) >Memory: 33.5M >CGroup: /system.slice/firewalld.service >└─1031 /usr/libexec/platform-python -s /usr/sbin/firewalld > --nofork > > lines 1-9/9 (END) > It seems this became the default at some point. systemctl -l --no-pager is the way to get it without that. The whole does it use a pager, does it ellipse, etc has been a long fight where various people complain enough to get it one way or another. It usually goes with the group that complains the nicest versus the ones who complain the worst :). -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?
> > is what is annoying me. That seems to be what I would expect if I > piped it to less. I checked a fedora 31 and another centos 8 box and > am seeing the same behaviour. Am I missing something? > The environment variable $PAGER determines what pager to use. The default is 'less'. User export PAGER=more to use 'more' instead. Or export PAGER= to not pipe to a pager. P, ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] systemctl behaves like it is being piped to less in centos 8?
Comparing the output of systemctl between centos 7 and 8: [root@mail ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core) [root@mail ~]# systemctl status firewalld ● firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Fri 2019-10-25 00:24:24 UTC; 1 months 19 days ago Docs: man:firewalld(1) Main PID: 6578 (firewalld) CGroup: /system.slice/firewalld.service └─6578 /usr/bin/python2 -Es /usr/sbin/firewalld --nofork --nopid Warning: Journal has been rotated since unit was started. Log output is incomplete or unavailable. [root@mail ~]# So far so good. Don't know why it is complaining about log being rotated but output looks readable. Now, let's grab a centos8 box: [raub@vmhost2 ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux release 8.0.1905 (Core) [raub@vmhost2 ~]$ systemctl status firewalld ● firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled; vendor p> Active: active (running) since Tue 2019-12-10 20:10:20 EST; 2 days ago Docs: man:firewalld(1) Main PID: 1031 (firewalld) Tasks: 2 (limit: 26213) Memory: 33.5M CGroup: /system.slice/firewalld.service └─1031 /usr/libexec/platform-python -s /usr/sbin/firewalld --nofork > lines 1-9/9 (END) As you can see, it is trimming the output at the end of my terminal window, which I do not care; there are options (-i I think) to make it wrap around, but the line lines 1-9/9 (END) is what is annoying me. That seems to be what I would expect if I piped it to less. I checked a fedora 31 and another centos 8 box and am seeing the same behaviour. Am I missing something? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] tomcat package and repo for centos8
Hi Rainer On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 2:34 PM Rainer Traut wrote: > Is there any other third party repository which builds tomcat for > centos/rhel 8? I intend to build tomcat 8 and 9 for CentOS 8 in my harbottle-main repo ( https://harbottle.gitlab.io/harbottle-main ), just as I did for CentOS 7, but I'm having trouble with the log4j dependency in CentOS 8 (see my recent emails to this list). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] tomcat package and repo for centos8
Hi all, sadly there is no epel tomcat package so far. As per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745960 there is no progress for three months. Is there any other third party repository which builds tomcat for centos/rhel 8? Thx Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-docs] [centos/centos.org] branch master updated: Updated Steadfast's sponsor logo, per request
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. arrfab pushed a commit to branch master in repository centos/centos.org. The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new 757f25c Updated Steadfast's sponsor logo, per request 757f25c is described below commit 757f25caec7c810c4debf186f4bb9a1bcb530d3b Author: Fabian Arrotin AuthorDate: Fri Dec 13 14:57:38 2019 +0100 Updated Steadfast's sponsor logo, per request Signed-off-by: Fabian Arrotin --- static/images/sponsors/steadfast.png | Bin 22668 -> 5884 bytes 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/static/images/sponsors/steadfast.png b/static/images/sponsors/steadfast.png index 978e43e..6d5b287 100644 Binary files a/static/images/sponsors/steadfast.png and b/static/images/sponsors/steadfast.png differ -- To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact the administrator of this repository. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS website/blog localization support for IT (italian...) language
On 12/10/19 7:20 AM, Andy Tech wrote: Hi all, still again here... I'm doing some working to start the Italian translation job (build a glossary and share some good rules to approach translation task) I've analyzed the wiki software (MoinMoin) and found it extremely useful and simple and I'm trying to get in touch with the it-translator-team of that platform. I've two questions : 1) Can you share the usage/mostly accessed page on the wiki (to choose where to start from the translating job and also to check how many pages are served from the /it/ sub roots) No, I don't think we track any stats of that nature. Exactly what's https://planet.centos.org? It seems to be a historical overview of what's happened in the CentOS community from the beginning of 2017 until today ... planet.centos is a blog aggregator. However, since we have almost no active bloggers in our community, it ends up just being a mirror of the main blog.centos.org site. A while back I looked around for some active centOS bloggers who were posting quality content, and came up with almost nothing. If you're aware of any, we can try to get them added on. Can I also translate this? Perhaps starting from the beginning of 2019 posts... I noted this page seems to be served and managed from a different platform (http://www.planetplanet.org/) If you think there's value in translating these blog posts, I suppose that would be fine. I'm not sure, though, where we would host that content. -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166 ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen Version update policy
Hi, On 13/12/2019 01.31, Steven Haigh wrote: > 2) There's no brctl in CentOS 8. The network scripts need to be > re-written to use 'ip' instead. To maintain compatibility, the network > scripts need to support both brctl and ip commands and use whichever is > present on the system. I think the default is to use Network Manager / nmcli? I'm not sure if NM is going to do things with interfaces you created through ip. regards Nils -- Nils Meyer - IT ConsultingBergkoppelweg 8, 22335 Hamburg E-Mail: n...@nm.cx UST Id: DE256495282 PGP Key Fingerprint DD56 65D0 A3FB 5E6B B98D F66E 5F12 ABF5 D8FE 47DF https://nm.cx/n...@nm.cx.aschttps://www.xing.com/profile/Nils_Meyer7 ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen Version update policy
It seems to rh/centos has removed the xen code from their kernels... I was able to boot centos8 as domU but only with an elrepo kernel... Look at elrepo kernel I think it should do as dom0 to... --- -- Greetz Am 13.12.2019 13:41, schrieb Steven Haigh: The latest bunch of test packages are available here: http://au1.mirror.crc.id.au/repo/el8/x86_64/ Hopefully, as of a few hours ago, this set should actually install. Currently, networking won't work as they require brctl - which isn't in EL8. I've written patches for this, but they'll probably end up being part of a cleanup of everything in /etc/xen/scripts/ Problem is, they're probably too late for the 4.13.0 release - so I'll have to carry them myself for a while until they hit the git staging area within Xen. I don't have a kernel capable of being a Dom0 as yet - so that's still at a roll your own or obtain elsewhere status. The source for all this is here: https://git.crc.id.au/netwiz/xen413 Yes, I take patches. Steven Haigh net...@crc.id.au https://www.crc.id.au ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen Version update policy
The latest bunch of test packages are available here: http://au1.mirror.crc.id.au/repo/el8/x86_64/ Hopefully, as of a few hours ago, this set should actually install. Currently, networking won't work as they require brctl - which isn't in EL8. I've written patches for this, but they'll probably end up being part of a cleanup of everything in /etc/xen/scripts/ Problem is, they're probably too late for the 4.13.0 release - so I'll have to carry them myself for a while until they hit the git staging area within Xen. I don't have a kernel capable of being a Dom0 as yet - so that's still at a roll your own or obtain elsewhere status. The source for all this is here: https://git.crc.id.au/netwiz/xen413 Yes, I take patches. Steven Haigh net...@crc.id.au https://www.crc.id.au On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:11, Christoph wrote: hi if you need someone to test the centos8 pkgs, Im interested :) --- -- Greetz Am 13.12.2019 01:31, schrieb Steven Haigh: On 2019-12-13 04:54, Kevin Stange wrote: I don't want to burden Steven Haigh any, but I wonder if there's a way we could combine some of our efforts to make both "Xen made easy!" and the Virt SIG Xen easier to manage. I've been thinking about this for a while. The problem has been the workflows between myself and the SIG are so far apart, its hard to look at how to merge them. I have full CI between my own git and packages to the mirrors - which is good, but has its down sides. I also don't have the restrictions of the CentOS build system to deal with - which is great for my workflow ;) I'm prepping packages for CentOS 8 now - but its exposing quite a number of problems around the main toolsets for Xen - and instead of just adding my own patch and moving on (ala Fedora's Xen packages), I'm trying to get fixes in upstream where possible. My todo list currently includes: 1) Replace all #! that include env python to a specific python version/binary. ie /usr/bin/python or /usr/bin/python3. The configure portions of this are complete, but the scripts need to be altered to have the detected python version populated. 2) There's no brctl in CentOS 8. The network scripts need to be re-written to use 'ip' instead. To maintain compatibility, the network scripts need to support both brctl and ip commands and use whichever is present on the system. 3) UEFI support needs to be tested. The preferred UEFI boot method for Dom0 is to use grub to then boot Xen - but this needs to be tested. So while me moving to try and get these fixed upstream is great - it should make everyone's job easier in the long term. Although I have the same problem as the SIG - there's just not enough people to test / patch stuff. The more we deep dive into 4.13, the further away I can see the release happening :( ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] log4j12 package in CentOS 8
The weird thing is that I can see the package right here in the repo!: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8/AppStream/x86_64/os/Packages/ What am I misunderstanding? On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 8:04 PM Richard G wrote: > > According to the RHEL docs, package log4j was replaced with package > log4j12 in RHEL 8.0. However, when I attempt to install the package in > CentOS 8, dnf cannot find it. I have the Base, AppStream, Extras and > PowerTools repos enabled. What am I doing wrong? > > Thanks! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DebugInfo repo broken on purpose
On 13/12/2019 02:09, Warren Young wrote: > This line in /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Debuginfo.repo > > baseurl=http://debuginfo.centos.org/$releasever/$basearch/ > > …causes commands like “yum search --enablerepo=* foo” to fail with the > obscure error > > Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'base-debuginfo' > > Apparently this is because the debug info RPMs aren’t hosted there any more, > per the page at the top of the site. However, when I edit that file to point > to the Facebook mirror linked from the top of the debuginfo.centos.org site, > I get the same error, even after assorted remediations: dnf makecache, dnf > update, etc. > > Any ideas on how to fix it, hopefully in a way that lands in a CentOS 8.next, > so it doesn’t have to be fixed manually? > > And in the meantime, is there a short syntax for “search all repos other than > the debuginfo ones”? I could list every repo in a comma-separated list, but > ugh. Well, I guess that it's because repodata weren't even generated .. ? http://debuginfo.centos.org/8/x86_64/ -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen Version update policy
hi if you need someone to test the centos8 pkgs, Im interested :) --- -- Greetz Am 13.12.2019 01:31, schrieb Steven Haigh: On 2019-12-13 04:54, Kevin Stange wrote: I don't want to burden Steven Haigh any, but I wonder if there's a way we could combine some of our efforts to make both "Xen made easy!" and the Virt SIG Xen easier to manage. I've been thinking about this for a while. The problem has been the workflows between myself and the SIG are so far apart, its hard to look at how to merge them. I have full CI between my own git and packages to the mirrors - which is good, but has its down sides. I also don't have the restrictions of the CentOS build system to deal with - which is great for my workflow ;) I'm prepping packages for CentOS 8 now - but its exposing quite a number of problems around the main toolsets for Xen - and instead of just adding my own patch and moving on (ala Fedora's Xen packages), I'm trying to get fixes in upstream where possible. My todo list currently includes: 1) Replace all #! that include env python to a specific python version/binary. ie /usr/bin/python or /usr/bin/python3. The configure portions of this are complete, but the scripts need to be altered to have the detected python version populated. 2) There's no brctl in CentOS 8. The network scripts need to be re-written to use 'ip' instead. To maintain compatibility, the network scripts need to support both brctl and ip commands and use whichever is present on the system. 3) UEFI support needs to be tested. The preferred UEFI boot method for Dom0 is to use grub to then boot Xen - but this needs to be tested. So while me moving to try and get these fixed upstream is great - it should make everyone's job easier in the long term. Although I have the same problem as the SIG - there's just not enough people to test / patch stuff. The more we deep dive into 4.13, the further away I can see the release happening :( ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] DebugInfo repo broken on purpose
On 12/13/19 2:09 AM, Warren Young wrote: > This line in /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Debuginfo.repo > > baseurl=http://debuginfo.centos.org/$releasever/$basearch/ > > …causes commands like “yum search --enablerepo=* foo” to fail with the > obscure error > > Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'base-debuginfo' > > Apparently this is because the debug info RPMs aren’t hosted there any more, > per the page at the top of the site. However, when I edit that file to point > to the Facebook mirror linked from the top of the debuginfo.centos.org site, > I get the same error, even after assorted remediations: dnf makecache, dnf > update, etc. > > Any ideas on how to fix it, hopefully in a way that lands in a CentOS 8.next, > so it doesn’t have to be fixed manually? > > And in the meantime, is there a short syntax for “search all repos other than > the debuginfo ones”? I could list every repo in a comma-separated list, but > ugh. > yum search --enablerepo=* --disablerepo=*-debuginfo foo HTH, Kay ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
