Re: [CentOS] gpgcheck of rpms / anaconda / kickstart / composer install

2020-02-19 Thread Heath Nye 
remove me

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:32 PM Leon Fauster via CentOS 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I wonder if the gpgchecks are done while installing a system via
> anaconda? Any experts here?
>
> I was playing with the livemedia-creator and had a 3rd party repo in my
> ks file. The packages were installed without any problems although
> having not any key in the rpm db imported. So that leads me to the
> assumption that the gpgchecks are not done. How to get the integrity
> check done? reposync and manual check as a pre composer step?
>
> I appreciate any hints ...
>
> --
> Leon
>
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>


-- 
Heath Nye
*Systems Administrator*
*P:*877-344-8450
*E:* heath@industryweapon.com
*www.industryweapon.com   |  *900 Parish
Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15220







::
Disclaimer ::
The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is
intended solely for the use of the named addressee/'s. Access, copying or
re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other
person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please
notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] gpgcheck of rpms / anaconda / kickstart / composer install

2020-02-19 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS 

Hi all,

I wonder if the gpgchecks are done while installing a system via 
anaconda? Any experts here?


I was playing with the livemedia-creator and had a 3rd party repo in my 
ks file. The packages were installed without any problems although 
having not any key in the rpm db imported. So that leads me to the 
assumption that the gpgchecks are not done. How to get the integrity 
check done? reposync and manual check as a pre composer step?


I appreciate any hints ...

--
Leon




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Need info on adobe flash player plugin 32 for CentOS7

2020-02-19 Thread Kay Schenk 


On 2/11/20 5:18 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:

James Pearson wrote:

J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote:

On 16/01/2020 20:37, Steve Clark wrote:

On 01/16/2020 03:30 PM, Chris Adams wrote:

Once upon a time, Kay Schenk  said:

I kept getting messages that my old Flash Player 31 was obsolete so
I went in search of an update.

Adobe stopped releasing Flash for Linux a while back.  IIRC the only
"supported" Flash on Linux is distributed as a part of Google Chrome
(and that's going away sometime soon too, Chrome on all platforms
will
no longer support Flash).


Don't know about C7 but I just yum updated my C6 system.
adobe-linux-x86_64 | 2.9 kB 00:00

Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package flash-plugin.x86_64 0:32.0.0.255-release will be updated
---> Package flash-plugin.x86_64 0:32.0.0.314-release will be an
update
--> Finished Dependency Resolution


It's still supported on C7:

$ yum list | grep flash
flash-plugin.x86_64    32.0.0.314-release @adobe-linux-x86_64
...

I think you'll find the latest releases won't run on CentOS 7:

% ldd libflashplayer.so
./libflashplayer.so: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.21' not
found (required by ./libflashplayer.so)

and hence Firefox won't load this version ...

The last version that runs on CentOS 7 is 32.0.0.270

See: https://tracker.adobe.com/#/view/FP-4199058

Adobe have recently released Flash 32.0.0.330 - which works OK on CentOS
6/7

Thanks for lettings us know, I already gave up checking as they didn't
manage to fix it for so many weeks.

Seems they finally found out that upgrading their build hosts to the
latest greatest distribution was not the smartest idea :-)

Regards,
Simon


Hi all --

Yes, I too just got an update on Flash 32.0.0.330

pushed to my system. Firefox seems to recognize it as a plugin and it works 
fine.

Trying to install the plugin provided by Adobe site wasn't successful for me.:-(



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 180, Issue 4

2020-02-19 Thread centos-announce-request 
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2020:0521 Important CentOS 6 firefox Security Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   2. CESA-2020:0515 Important CentOS 6 ksh SecurityUpdate
  (Johnny Hughes)
   3. CESA-2020:0520 Important CentOS 7 firefox Security Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   4. CESA-2020:0541 Important CentOS 7 java-1.7.0-openjdk Security
  Update (Johnny Hughes)
   5. CESA-2020:0540 Important CentOS 7 sudo Security   Update
  (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:27:59 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2020:0521 Important CentOS 6 firefox
Security Update
Message-ID: <20200218162759.ga17...@bstore1.rdu2.centos.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:0521 Important

Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0521

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
d43d61853b40107c46c134fd55a9c534d542ac46eaf41fb552229f8f2847f611  
firefox-68.5.0-2.el6.centos.i686.rpm

x86_64:
d43d61853b40107c46c134fd55a9c534d542ac46eaf41fb552229f8f2847f611  
firefox-68.5.0-2.el6.centos.i686.rpm
c5c89229eb8001aae7c67813ab6decbad01f1490eed0ad6dacf6179d3f1ae909  
firefox-68.5.0-2.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm

Source:
d76a824ccbbd2969af061d8b0e1fc79d69ad4ce24d4048d538b54d88aaa91f48  
firefox-68.5.0-2.el6.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS



--

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:29:10 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2020:0515 Important CentOS 6 ksh
SecurityUpdate
Message-ID: <20200218162910.ga17...@bstore1.rdu2.centos.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:0515 Important

Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0515

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
60f31eb1eeb85ee75993562ed776948f2fa42f5cb3daa55b34d32e8314717099  
ksh-20120801-38.el6_10.i686.rpm

x86_64:
0065fa89236a838064da000de793fc751f17bdf3cd13f554a2d504d30dc9524b  
ksh-20120801-38.el6_10.x86_64.rpm

Source:
f2e78f2920502527bf67d56c6f4823fb037680e241954770b01e7d46452163d0  
ksh-20120801-38.el6_10.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS



--

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:18:44 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2020:0520 Important CentOS 7 firefox
Security Update
Message-ID: <20200218221844.ga30...@bstore1.rdu2.centos.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:0520 Important

Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0520

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
cabd0f607b8b426403c5f84f15cb36b727b8792d122f3bb2547d4d965618  
firefox-68.5.0-2.el7.centos.i686.rpm
11046ce36b466eeb0619c65b9df1ed10137bb07f3f01eba9a97d05648a04d714  
firefox-68.5.0-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm

Source:
377fa5d423b415ca61552036614942832b1570258973ad8541056292981425b4  
firefox-68.5.0-2.el7.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS



--

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:20:02 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2020:0541 Important CentOS 7
java-1.7.0-openjdk Security Update
Message-ID: <20200218222002.ga30...@bstore1.rdu2.centos.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:0541 Important

Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0541

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
7ccac31a20eab804358cb7c553b075ff9f5a300262c4aa2c9f296125de67c450  
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.251-2.6.21.0.el7_7.x86_64.rpm
eb646678be3d37c16ccd39579a10a467ba7dd876ddc0053ea1e534c7