[CentOS] Troubles with NetworkManager
NetworkManager used to work fine for me but during the last few installations its a big hurdle in the wireless connectivity. I'm using Madwifi and its interface is correctly listed and working but I cannot connect to any wifi AP without NetworkManager. I've two interfaces: eth0 and wifi0. Starting NetworkManager doesn't show any notification icon in the top right in gnome and I believe its only activating the ath0 instead of wireless interface wifi0 but still I am unable to see any of the notification icon in the gnome as I was used to in past for any of the NICs. The error which I recieve upon logging into the gnome is: The NetworkManager applet could not find some required resources. It cannot conitnue. But still, there are no errors in the syslogs besides the below ones particularly *localhost NetworkManager: WARNING nm_device_802_11_wireless_scan (): could not trigger wireless scan on device ath0: Network is down*. Thanks in advance for the helpout. [EMAIL PROTECTED] abbask]# grep -A 2 -B2 NetworkManager /var/log/messages | tail -60 Jan 15 05:35:31 localhost NetworkManager: information Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) started... Jan 15 05:35:31 localhost NetworkManager: information Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) scheduled... Jan 15 05:35:31 localhost NetworkManager: information Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) complete. Jan 15 05:35:31 localhost NetworkManager: information Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) starting... Jan 15 05:35:31 localhost NetworkManager: information Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) successful. Jan 15 05:35:31 localhost NetworkManager: information Activation (eth0) Stage 3 of 5 (IP Configure Start) scheduled. Jan 15 05:35:31 localhost NetworkManager: information Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) complete. Jan 15 05:35:31 localhost NetworkManager: information Activation (eth0) Stage 3 of 5 (IP Configure Start) started... Jan 15 05:35:31 localhost dhclient: wifi0: unknown hardware address type 801 Jan 15 05:35:31 localhost dhclient: wifi0: unknown hardware address type 801 -- Jan 15 05:35:31 localhost NET[6581]: /sbin/dhclient-script : updated /etc/resolv.conf Jan 15 05:35:31 localhost dhclient: bound to 13.13.13.4 -- renewal in 1581 seconds. Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost NetworkManager: information Activation (eth0) Beginning DHCP transaction. Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost dhclient: wifi0: unknown hardware address type 801 Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost NetworkManager: information Activation (eth0) Stage 3 of 5 (IP Configure Start) complete. Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost NetworkManager: information DHCP daemon state is now 12 (successfully started) for interface eth0 Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost NetworkManager: information DHCP daemon state is now 1 (starting) for interface eth0 Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost dhclient: wifi0: unknown hardware address type 801 Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost avahi-daemon[5154]: New relevant interface eth0.IPv6 for mDNS. -- Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost dhclient: DHCPREQUEST on eth0 to 255.255.255.255port 67 Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost dhclient: DHCPACK from 13.13.13.3 Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost NetworkManager: information DHCP daemon state is now 4 (reboot) for interface eth0 Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost NetworkManager: information Activation (eth0) Stage 4 of 5 (IP Configure Get) scheduled... Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost NetworkManager: information Activation (eth0) Stage 4 of 5 (IP Configure Get) started... Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost dhclient: bound to 13.13.13.4 -- renewal in 1438 seconds. Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost dhcdbd: message_handler: message handler not found under /com/redhat/dhcp/eth0 for sub-path eth0.dbus.get.host_name -- Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost dhcdbd: message_handler: message handler not found under /com/redhat/dhcp/eth0 for sub-path eth0.dbus.get.nis_domain Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost dhcdbd: message_handler: message handler not found under /com/redhat/dhcp/eth0 for sub-path eth0.dbus.get.nis_servers Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost NetworkManager: information Retrieved the following IP4 configuration from the DHCP daemon: Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost NetworkManager: information address 13.13.13.4 Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost NetworkManager: information netmask 255.255.255.0 Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost NetworkManager: information broadcast 13.13.13.255 Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost NetworkManager: information gateway 13.13.13.3 Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost NetworkManager: information nameserver 13.13.13.3 Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost NetworkManager: information Activation (eth0) Stage 5 of 5 (IP Configure Commit) scheduled... Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost NetworkManager: information Activation (eth0) Stage 4 of 5 (IP Configure Get) complete. Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost NetworkManager: information Activation (eth0) Stage 5 of 5 (IP Configure Commit) started... Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost avahi-daemon[5154]: Withdrawing address record for 13.13.13.4 on eth0. Jan 15 05:35:32 localhost
[CentOS] Crash recovery
While playing with the graphic card drivers, I broke up the system and now I've a kernel panic with not syncing error. I did backup the system with mondorescue but I forgot to write the iso image files to the DVD rom. Can I burn the ISO file in rescue mode or in CentOS livecd environment? Already tried in the LiveCD env, but, as soon as I eject the live CD to put a blank DVD, the system halts ! Are there any other options available? Please advise. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Crash recovery
Yep, gives the same kernel panic there as well unfortunately... On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:53 PM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ABBAS KHAN wrote: While playing with the graphic card drivers, I broke up the system and now I've a kernel panic with not syncing error. I did backup the system with mondorescue but I forgot to write the iso image files to the DVD rom. Can I burn the ISO file in rescue mode or in CentOS livecd environment? Already tried in the LiveCD env, but, as soon as I eject the live CD to put a blank DVD, the system halts ! Are there any other options available? can you boot up in single user? you should be able to burn the CD there ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos on intel D945GCLF board
I've Intel DG31PR with almost same Realtek chipset. Disabling / enabling on board LAN from the BIOS works flawlessly. You can make sure if the board is certified at hardware.redhat.com. I guess to test kernal you can use CentOS Live CD and the dmesg tool as well. Good luck! On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 6:22 AM, Janez Košmrlj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am trying to install centos on the intel D945GCLF board. It's a mini-ITX board with the atom processor and it uses the Realtek RTL8102EL LAN chipset. When I disable the on-board LAN card it installs and runs OK, but when I enable it, I get kernel panic at boot. The board runs perfectlj with Fedora 9 (with the latest kernel) or with Ubuntu server. My question is: is there some way to run centos on this board (test kernel, i can try for example)? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?
I'm adding the default gateway to the route through route add default gw 10.10.10.10 which is also shown in route -n but the problem is that as soon as I restart the network through /etc/init.d/network restart; the route sets to default one...! SO, my question is there any way to save the modified route permanently by hardcoding the changes? Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos on intel D945GCLF board
Is this the kernel module used for the LAN card driver? *r8169 * On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Janez Košmrlj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried kernel-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5.x86_64. I know of the driver on the Intel page, but I would like a system that works out of the box. So I can update it any time, since this system will be a router and it will be connected to the internet 24/7. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.2/updates/x86_64/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5.x86_64.rpm ABBAS KHAN wrote: Here is the driver, provided for Intel for the board. http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?ProductID=2916DwnldID=16242lang=eng http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?ProductID=2916DwnldID=16242lang=eng You can compile it and give it a try as a last resort, if everything else fails. Could you please tell the version of kernal you're using? A simple search showed that this LAN card has a lot of issues with kernal. Thanks. On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Janez Košmrlj [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know that disabling the LAN in BIOS works. The problem is that I need the on-board card, since I am trying to build a home router and I need 2 LAN cards for that. And the board has only one PCI slot. ABBAS KHAN wrote: I've Intel DG31PR with almost same Realtek chipset. Disabling / enabling on board LAN from the BIOS works flawlessly. You can make sure if the board is certified at hardware.redhat.com http://hardware.redhat.com http://hardware.redhat.com. I guess to test kernal you can use CentOS Live CD and the dmesg tool as well. Good luck! On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 6:22 AM, Janez Košmrlj [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am trying to install centos on the intel D945GCLF board. It's a mini-ITX board with the atom processor and it uses the Realtek RTL8102EL LAN chipset. When I disable the on-board LAN card it installs and runs OK, but when I enable it, I get kernel panic at boot. The board runs perfectlj with Fedora 9 (with the latest kernel) or with Ubuntu server. My question is: is there some way to run centos on this board (test kernel, i can try for example)? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?
Thats the config file, I was looking for. Thanks Tom. Worked like a charm :) On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 6:48 AM, Tom Diehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, ABBAS KHAN wrote: I'm adding the default gateway to the route through route add default gw 10.10.10.10 which is also shown in route -n but the problem is that as soon as I restart the network through /etc/init.d/network restart; the route sets to default one...! SO, my question is there any way to save the modified route permanently by hardcoding the changes? There are several ways, actually. System-config-network is one way, or if like me you prefer to edit the config files by hand you can edit the files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth* or the file /etc/sysconfig/network. There needs to be a GATEWAY= line in one of those files. If you have an existing GATEWAY line modify it to taste. If you have no default gateway I would suggest putting it in /etc/sysconfig/ifcfg-eth?. Where the ? corresponds to the interface that points to the gateway. Hope this helps. Regards, -- Tom Diehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spamtrap address [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Where is cached memory going?
As by the time, I've learned that Linux works by caching apps by using a lot
of RAM and then it reallocates the new stuff by cleaning the old cached
pages from memory as compared to other OSs. With 2 gigs of RAM often I see
the free memory only as 100-400MB. Using TOP or PS, it doesn't look like any
program or process is using excessive memory (the highest process is seen
with 1-2% total memory). *So, my questions are:*
what programs are using that much of memory? (or cached memory)
Is that really due to a lot of cache in the memory
*if yes, then, is there a way to parse the cache to findout what
applications are eating up the cache?*
*how to free the cached memory?*
*Currently, here are the details:*
Top two high mem processes only using 2.6% of RAM.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ps aux | sort -nrk4 | head -2
abbask5922 0.0 1.4 364300 28312 ?SAug19 0:00
/usr/bin/python -E /usr/bin/sealert -s
ntop 4914 0.0 1.2 332752 24760 ?Ssl Aug19 0:00 ntop -d -L
@/etc/ntop.conf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# head -5 /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 1913856 kB
MemFree:500612 kB
Buffers:169720 kB
Cached: 751000 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# free -m
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 1869 1380488 0165733
-/+ buffers/cache:480 1388
Swap: 1983 0 1983
*Total percentage memory for all the processes, being used is 15.5% only.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ps aux | awk '{print $4}' | grep [0-9] | tr -s \n + |
awk '{print $1 0 }' | bc
15.5*
*
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?
Thanks Bob for the additional tip :) On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Bob Beers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IIANM, you can also use /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth*, no? Take a look at /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-routes script. -Bob ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos on intel D945GCLF board
Thats what I wanted to know and thats exactly what I saw people complaining about this card's incompatibility with kernel. If you have time to work on the issue, if you want to find out the bottom causes and if compiling the new driver doesn't help; you can boot to Fedora and get the Kernel version and the driver's module number and then switch back to CentOS, try to load the same module (i hope it would be also in CentOS under /lib/modules/) through modprobe and then the same kernel environment, if possible - since you already told that Fedora's drivers work fine for you! I hope this helps! On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Janez Košmrlj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the lspci output from the machine: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ/P/PL Memory Controller Hub (rev 02) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller (rev 01) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 01) 00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 3 (rev 01) 00:1c.3 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 4 (rev 01) 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 (rev 01) 00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #2 (rev 01) 00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #3 (rev 01) 00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 (rev 01) 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 01) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev e1) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801GB/GR (ICH7 Family) LPC Interface Bridge (rev 01) 00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) IDE Controller (rev 01) 00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801GB/GR/GH (ICH7 Family) SATA IDE Controller (rev 01) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 01) 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8101E PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller (rev ff) 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) the RTL-8139 is the secondary card pluged in the pci slot ad this one works ok. And yes this is the module. And to Michael. I know of the disabling on-board LAN workaround, but i need two LAN cards. ABBAS KHAN wrote: Is this the kernel module used for the LAN card driver? /*r8169 */ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Where is cached memory going?
An awesome reply. Makes sense! Thanks. On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:42 AM, David Dyer-Bennet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, August 19, 2008 11:31, ABBAS KHAN wrote: As by the time, I've learned that Linux works by caching apps by using a lot of RAM and then it reallocates the new stuff by cleaning the old cached pages from memory as compared to other OSs. With 2 gigs of RAM often I see the free memory only as 100-400MB. Using TOP or PS, it doesn't look like any program or process is using excessive memory (the highest process is seen with 1-2% total memory). *So, my questions are:* what programs are using that much of memory? (or cached memory) It's very likely being used as disk cache. You can get some more numbers by running top, and looking at the last two lines of the headers. I routinely see over 1GB of cache on a not very active 4GB system. Your meminfo output is the same numbers, and looks completely normal to me. Free memory is *bad*; it means it's being wasted completely. Memory used for disk caching is instantly available if it's suddenly needed for a program. Is that really due to a lot of cache in the memory *if yes, then, is there a way to parse the cache to findout what applications are eating up the cache?* It's only indirectly tied to an application; it's cached disk blocks. You could say the process that read that file last is responsible, but the *next* process to read those blocks is the one that would benefit. *how to free the cached memory?* Why do you want to? As I said, free memory is memory that's going to waste. Unless you have severe real-time issues with a process becoming runnable where the difference between discarding a clean cached page, and just allocating a free page, will make a difference, there's no point. If you DO have that level really extreme real-time performance issues, you need to understand the whole virtual memory system an order of magnitude better than you seem to. That's off in a far corner of the Linux application space -- Linux can do some real-time stuff, but it's not the first choice for hard real-time environments last time I talked to any of those people. -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED]; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Where is cached memory going?
LOL ! I got that fellows :D But, I guess, computer geeks don't usually have girl friends and the same I do!! Unfortunately :( LOL On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:37 AM, David Dyer-Bennet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, August 19, 2008 12:06, William L. Maltby wrote: On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 11:50 -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: I don't recall that anybody referred to DASD connected to our IBM 1401; it was just disk. Were we just a weird corner (I wouldn't swear they didn't use some weird term like DASD in the manuals, just that none of the people I worked with used it)? Or was that a later term, say from the 360 generation? (When I worked on the 1401, we were in fact well into the 360 generation chronologically, just not at the place I was working; that was in 1969, and we moved from the 1401 to a DEC PDP-11/20 just a couple of years after that.) Ditto here. But our 1401 stuff was being emulated on S360/30. During that time, DASD became the lazy acronym used extensively to cover any of the then-extant direct-access devices (drums, cylinders, disks - euphemistically mounted in pizza ovens (2314/19 IIRC). We emulated the 1401 on the DEC 11/20 for a while, first with a standalone emulator, later with a run-time system that integrated into RSTS and let us run the 1401 applications under time-sharing. I think of drums as being generally *before* then, and what are cylinders that differs from drums? But it *does* actually make sense to have a generic term for that class of storage; we just didn't have enough examples to need it, and DASD sounds stupid :-), and as an IBM mainframe term wasn't something we wanted to emulate. I suppose we're getting a bit far off-topic, but thanks for the stroll down memory lane! -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED]; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos on intel D945GCLF board
Cheers! On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Janez Košmrlj [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: OK, I downloaded the driver from Realtek homepage and build the modules and it works now. Thanks for the patience to everybody. Janez Košmrlj wrote: I don't have fedora installed on the machine any more. But if i understand correctly, if compiling the driver doesn't work, i can copy the module from a fedora machine and replace the current one? ABBAS KHAN wrote: Thats what I wanted to know and thats exactly what I saw people complaining about this card's incompatibility with kernel. If you have time to work on the issue, if you want to find out the bottom causes and if compiling the new driver doesn't help; you can boot to Fedora and get the Kernel version and the driver's module number and then switch back to CentOS, try to load the same module (i hope it would be also in CentOS under /lib/modules/) through modprobe and then the same kernel environment, if possible - since you already told that Fedora's drivers work fine for you! I hope this helps! On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Janez Košmrlj [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the lspci output from the machine: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ/P/PL Memory Controller Hub (rev 02) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller (rev 01) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 01) 00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 3 (rev 01) 00:1c.3 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) PCI Express Port 4 (rev 01) 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 (rev 01) 00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #2 (rev 01) 00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #3 (rev 01) 00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 (rev 01) 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 01) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev e1) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801GB/GR (ICH7 Family) LPC Interface Bridge (rev 01) 00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) IDE Controller (rev 01) 00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801GB/GR/GH (ICH7 Family) SATA IDE Controller (rev 01) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 01) 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8101E PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller (rev ff) 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) the RTL-8139 is the secondary card pluged in the pci slot ad this one works ok. And yes this is the module. And to Michael. I know of the disabling on-board LAN workaround, but i need two LAN cards. ABBAS KHAN wrote: Is this the kernel module used for the LAN card driver? /*r8169 */ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Is there a way to save the routing table permanently?
Currently, only one NIC wifi0. AFAIK, /etc/rc.local will only be executed once after other init scripts. And this reverts the changes to default after restarting the network. Thanks. On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Rob Townley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:32 AM, ABBAS KHAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Bob for the additional tip :) On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Bob Beers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IIANM, you can also use /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth*, no? Take a look at /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-routes script. -Bob ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos How many NICs? SELinux? When you have SELinux, two NICs each that would use two different gateways, system-config-network is worthless whether using the GUI or text based one. The route will not stay permanent. ifup would not process either route.ethX nor ethX.route - at least not enough for it to show in route. Had to set the routes in /etc/rc.local. Of course, you can't set two default gateways, but you can add two routes via something like the following: route add -net 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0 gw a.b.c.ddev eth0 route add -net 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0 gw w.x.y.zdev eth1 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Boot CentOS 5 to command line
Hi fellows, Pretty new to CentOS. I was trying to find a way to boot CentOS into command prompt instead of GUI (or without loading any services). Tried using 'Crl+Alt+F1' at the boot process, but, that holds the screen at mounting and doing fstab and doesn't proceed further. Is there anyother way to boot CentOS into command prompt without using Rescue option from the installation CD? Thanks. Best. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Boot CentOS 5 to command line
Thanks you :) On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Bobby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 18 August 2008 14:46:22 ABBAS KHAN wrote: Hi fellows, Pretty new to CentOS. I was trying to find a way to boot CentOS into command prompt instead of GUI (or without loading any services). Tried using 'Crl+Alt+F1' at the boot process, but, that holds the screen at mounting and doing fstab and doesn't proceed further. Is there anyother way to boot CentOS into command prompt without using Rescue option from the installation CD? Thanks. Best. Then there is the temporary method for when you forget the passwd. Or simply want to get into single user mode. Which is to add the word single to the kernel boot line (if you are using GRUB boot loader, which is default in CentOS). When GRUB appears press any key to stop the automatic countdown. Select the kernel to boot from and press e for edit. Then cursor down to the line that starts with kernel (usually the 2nd line), and press e to edit that line. Go to the end of the line and add a space and the word single. Press Enter to accept your change, and b to boot. It will now boot with your change. Please note, since we did not actually alter the config file it will not retain this change at any subsequent boots. -- Bobby ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
