RE: [CentOS] 4 or 5 for VMware server?
Vmware server is perfectly content on either CentOS 4 or 5 as host operating system. I guess in this case it will simply be a matter of preference. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WipeOut Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 11:56 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] 4 or 5 for VMware server? I am soon going to be setting up a box to run VMware server but have to make the choice between Centos 4.x or 5.x.. I have tested both and VMware installs in both.. So are there any pros or cons to either version or does it make no difference at all? TIA ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Installing VMWare Server 1.0.3 on CentOS 5
VMWare server will install on CentOS 5 without the need of the any-any patch. The symlink is all that is required and the kernel-devel packages. When going through the configuration script, it when it cannot identify where the sources are it will then prompt you for a new location whilst showing the current search location. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Mathis Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 3:14 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Installing VMWare Server 1.0.3 on CentOS 5 On 6/29/07, Mark Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was in the process of installing VMWare Server 1.0.3 via the tarball I downloaded from their site. When it asked for the C header files for my installed kernel (2.6.18-6), hey could not be found. When I initially installed CentOS, I made sure everything was included, so I am at a loss why they can not be found. I haven't tried installing it via the RPM, but I don't think it will make a difference. Any and all thoughts are appreciated. Thanks! > > Mark Once you have the kernel-devel package installed, I believe you need to make a link called /usr/src/linux from the actual location of the kernel headers. Sorry I can't be more specific. I did that a month or so ago, and I'm not at that machine right now. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] iptables question
They certainly are different... But if he wanted that feature in
iptables he could use the rule I specified. I was under the impression
he was looking to migrate...
That certainly may have been an assumption on my part.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Sliger
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:48 PM
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: RE: [CentOS] iptables question
I believe that iptables is different than freebsd's ipfw.
I don't think the rules would be expressed the same way.
Am I wrong?
-chaz
Charles L. Sliger, Information Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{Yahoo: chaz_sliger} {Google: chaz.sliger}
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of ann kok
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 7:46 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] iptables question
>
> Hi all
>
> Can iptables have log and deny rule together?
> if no. how can I make a deny rule and log rule and the log rule can
> limit the log entry eg: 200 if yes, how can I make it
>
> I am using freebsd ipfw.
> eg: ipfw add 22 deny log all from any to x.x.x.x
>
> thank you
>
>
>
> __
>
> __
> Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket:
> mail, news, photos & more.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] BQ/CentOS port forwarding
What happens when you try the following?
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -I eth1 -d 69.54.130.16 -p tcp -m tcp
--dport 25 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.10.10.12
Can we get an output of your iptables?
"iptables -L -nv --line-numbers"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Sliger
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:21 PM
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: RE: [CentOS] BQ/CentOS port forwarding
Here is the corresponding command from my iptables script:
EXTDEV=eth1
EXTIP=69.54.130.16
SMTPIP=10.10.10.12
$IPT -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $EXTDEV -p tcp -d $EXTIP --dport 25 \
-j DNAT --to-destination $SMTPIP
-chaz
Charles L. Sliger, Information Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{Yahoo: chaz_sliger} {Google: chaz.sliger}
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Richard Veale
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 1:38 PM
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: RE: [CentOS] BQ/CentOS port forwarding
>
> I tried to set up IPtables for it using:
>
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 3389 -j DNAT \
> --to 10.0.0.100
>
> but the 'to' statement does not seem to work on my CentOS box and
> every time I do anything to IPtables my DNS blows up.
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Richard Veale
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 8:32 AM
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: RE: [CentOS] BQ/CentOS port forwarding
>
> Thanks Robert,
> I have a Terminal Services Server that will be behind the inside
> interface, I need to forward hits on port 3389 eth1 to an IP address
> behind eth0.
>
> Richard Veale
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Robert Spangler
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 10:31 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] BQ/CentOs port forwarding
>
> On Thu June 14 2007 18:06, Richard Veale wrote:
>
> > Just bought a new BQ/CentOS box with full NuOnce load (Linux
> > 2.6.9-55.ELsmp, gcc 3.4.6, Red Hat 3.4.6-8, Apache 2.0.52, BQ
> > 5102r), to replace my old Qube 3 pro, I have NAT setup (eth0 =
> > inside, eth1 =
> outside)
> > but need to get port forwarding going. What is the best way?
>
> Well it depends on what you are trying to forward But to turn on
> forward in
>
> general use this;
>
> /bin/echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>
>
> --
>
> Regards
> Robert
>
> Smile... it increases your face value!
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] iptables question
Something along these lines should do the job for ya. iptables -A INPUT -s 0.0.0.0/0 -d x.x.x.x/32 -m hashlimit --hashlimit 200 --hashlimit-mode dstip -j LOG iptables -A INPUT -s 0.0.0.0/0 -d x.x.x.x/32 -j DROP Dig around on this site for more details. http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/iptables-tutorial.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ann kok Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 10:46 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] iptables question Hi all Can iptables have log and deny rule together? if no. how can I make a deny rule and log rule and the log rule can limit the log entry eg: 200 if yes, how can I make it I am using freebsd ipfw. eg: ipfw add 22 deny log all from any to x.x.x.x thank you Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
