Re: [CentOS] load balancer recommendations
On 1/23/2013 12:22 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > On 1/23/2013 10:57 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Bowie Bailey wrote: >>> On 1/20/2013 10:12 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: You'll undoubtedly find more material on the iNet, but I hope the above may serve as a starting point. >>> The iNet? Wow, Apple's getting into everything these days... :) >> I think he meant the Inet. >> >> Missed the beginning of this thread, but if this is about serious hardware >> load balancers, a few years ago, where I was working, we bought one from >> Radware - less expensive than F5, and a very nice box, very configurable. >> >> ObBias: as I worked closely with the sales engineer setting it up, and got >> friendly with him, I'd be glad to get you in touch with him > We're using a Foundry ServerIron. Works well for us. > > But the OP was asking about a software load balancer. > I am a little late to the party on this one. So please excuse me if someone else has recommended HAproxy. I have been using it in a few production deployments, running it in a VM. Has been rock solid. -- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] increase harddisk diskspace Failed to suspend LogVol00
On 6/2/2011 1:13 PM, Manu wrote: Hi, I want to increase my harddisk space and receive the following error # lvextend -l +323 /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 Extending logical volume LogVol00 to 48.97 GB device-mapper: reload ioctl failed: Invalid argument Failed to suspend LogVol00 Try: lvextend -L +10G /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 upper case L Looks like you have 10.09GB free. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
On 4/7/2011 11:00 AM, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 08:52, Rudi Ahlers wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Anton Parol >> wrote: >>> Racism in open source software. That's the first time I've seen that. >>> Regardless of your dislike for someone, even if legitimate, comments like >>> that are NOT acceptable. >>> I suggest you make a swift and sincere apology. >>> >>> CentOS is free, and you get what you pay for. If you don't like it, fork >>> and make your own efforts. > I am receiving more than that. In fact, I have received from the > CentOS project more than what I could have payed for. And I keep > getting even more through the mailing list, wiki, and forums. Every > single day. These people are priceless and don't deserve to be > submitted to the harshness we have been witnessing lately. > I suggest we write up a blurb in the wiki or somewhere explaining the > full "When it's ready" case --in the point of view of those > responsible for the project, who's else? > And then, never, ever again, answer these questions with anything but > a link to that page. > had to give this one a + (1 * (infinity)) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!
John Hinton wrote: > All, > > (and please do not turn this into the next long thread) > > I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team members immensely. I sincerely thank you all for the time you put in to what i consider the best free Linux distro available. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cloning a server
PA wrote: > > Hi, I have a centos 5 (current) mail server that I have compiled > dovecot/postfix and installed some packages like mysql etc. These > packages have been configured and changed to my liking. How can I now > save all this and install it on another server without having to do > all the work of compiling installing and configuring the same > applications. Is it possible to burn this server image into multiple > DVD’s make it bootable and then install on another server. > > Basically I want to clone this server and make it easy to install on > another similar hardware server without having to install centos and > then manually installing/configuring dovecot/postfix/mysql etc. Not > sure if I can create a bootable ISO that will install on new servers > or what my options are. I would appreciate any suggestions. > > Paul > We use Clonezilla for this sort of thing. http://www.clonezilla.org/ Have had decent success with this. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] route question
I am trying to get my two WAN ethernet connections into one box to work. > Eth2 is cable, eth1 is T1 and eth0 is office LAN. Eth2 works just fine. > connections on eth1 dont seem to go anywhere. > > I thought it was the routing based on route -n info. > > I am also using iptable to preroute and postroute. What exactly does not work? Connecting to what destination IP? Your default route is pointing out eth2. So any traffic to a non-directly connected network will go out eth2. (without some additional static routes) What are you trying to accomplish? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] route question
>> GATEWAY=74.223.8.177 on /etc/sysconfig/network file ? >> >> > Actually I have that in the ifcfg-eth1 and ifcfg-eth2. And this is hte > route I get. > > DEVICE=eth1 > ONBOOT=YES > BOOTPROTO=static > IPADDR=74.223.8.179 > NETMASK=255.255.255.240 > GATEWAY=74.223.8.177 > > > DEVICE=eth2 > ONBOOT=Yes > BOOTPROTO=static > IPADDR=24.123.23.170 > NETMASK=255.255.255.248 > GATEWAY=24.123.23.169 > > route -n > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse > Iface > 24.123.23.168 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 00 eth2 > 74.223.8.1760.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0 00 eth1 > 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 > 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 00 eth2 > 0.0.0.0 24.123.23.169 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth2 > > > I dont want 74.X traffic going out 24.X network. I want it going back > out the 74.X network. > How do I setup the ifcfg-eth files so the GW above will route back out > the correct gw? > > Jerry > > > Traffic will already route out the appropriate interface for a directly connected network. So packets to an IP on the 74.223.8.176/28 subnet should route out eth1 and packets to the 24.123.23.168/29 network will route out eth2. Are you trying to route other subnets within the 74.X.X.X out eth1? Cj ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
