Re: [CentOS] OT: hardware, IBM 3650 M2 won't power on

[FrancisM]

On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 at 07:08, John R Pierce  wrote:

> On 2/22/2017 1:51 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > That's what I was saying - I tried connecting to it from another server
> in
> > the rack, and it's supposed to show a web page, but I can't ping it, and
> > firefox times out trying to connect to the default IP of 192.168.70.125.
>
> a default IP like that only works if the host connecting to it is on the
> same IP subnet and physical LAN segment, unless your routers know to
> route 192.168.70.0/24 to that physical segment. set a laptop to
> 192.168.70.10 mask 255.255.255.0 and plug a ethernet cable in directly
> between the IPMI/BMC management network port and the laptop, THEN try
> and connect to the web thingie.
>
>
>
>
> --
> john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




>
Just sharing my two cents. make sure the casing cover of that server is
close before you power-on again theres a sensor in that will preventing to
not powering on if the server case cover is remove.
-- 


Regards
./Francis

~The future has many paths - choose wisely.. ./StarWars:CloneWars
~If you only do what you can do, you will never be more than you are..
./Master Shifu
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Alternative to cPanel

[FrancisM]

On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 at 17:59, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:

> If you want free/foss then Virtualmin.
>
>
>
> Very good panel, good support and they have been highly consistent over
> the years and very receptive.
>
>
>
> CPanel has also improved massively in the last few years, well worth the
> price.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
>
>
> Nux!
>
> www.nux.ro
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
> > From: "FrancisM" <fran...@mytechrepublic.com>
>
> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
>
> > Sent: Thursday, 15 December, 2016 15:17:56
>
> > Subject: [CentOS] Alternative to cPanel
>
>
>
> > Dear All,
>
> >
>
> > Im looking for alternative for cPanel and somehow I read that the 'cwp
>
> > control web panel' (http://centos-webpanel.com) and Sentora (
>
> > http://www.sentora.ga) is the good alternative for cPanel.
>
> >
>
> > Is there someone using this application and what can you tell about or
>
> > recommend.
>
> >
>
> > Thank you all.
>
> > ___
>
> > CentOS mailing list
>
> > CentOS@centos.org
>
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> ___
>
> CentOS mailing list
>

>
> I have have tried the virtualmin and it seems its easy to undersdand and
> easy to use it. And the other that catches my eyes is their cloudmin i have
> not yet tried and looking forward to run some few test in it probobly after
> holidays.


> Thank you all for your sharing your thoughts about this.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Alternative to cPanel

[FrancisM]

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 at 02:10, Dave Stevens <g...@uniserve.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:23:31 +0100
>
> Andrew Holway <andrew.hol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I think most of the market is moving towards AWS Elastic Beanstalk,
>
> > OpenShift and Docker. It seems control panels are not really much of a
>
> > thing anymore.
>
> >
>
> > Cheers,
>
> >
>
> > Andrew
>
>
>
> the people at virtualmin.com don't agree. Neither do I, I use it a lot
>
> and like it.
>
>
>
> D
>
>
>
> >
>
> > On 15 December 2016 at 16:17, FrancisM <fran...@mytechrepublic.com>
>
> > wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > Dear All,
>
> > >
>
> > > Im looking for alternative for cPanel and somehow I read that the
>
> > > 'cwp control web panel' (http://centos-webpanel.com) and Sentora (
>
> > > http://www.sentora.ga) is the good alternative for cPanel.
>
> > >
>
> > > Is there someone using this application and what can you tell about
>
> > > or recommend.
>
> > >
>
> > > Thank you all.
>
> > > ___
>
> > > CentOS mailing list
>
> > > CentOS@centos.org
>
> > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> > >
>
> > ___
>
> > CentOS mailing list
>
> > CentOS@centos.org
>
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Reporter to Mahatma Ghandi after his tour of east London
>
> "What do you think of western civilization, Mr. Ghandi?"
>
> Ghandi - "I think it would be an excellent idea!"
>
>
>
> ___
>
> CentOS mailing list
>
> CentOS@centos.org
>
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
I agree with you Dave cPanel will always be there. Thank you guys for
sharing your thoughts
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Alternative to cPanel

[FrancisM]

Dear All,

Im looking for alternative for cPanel and somehow I read that the 'cwp
control web panel' (http://centos-webpanel.com) and Sentora (
http://www.sentora.ga) is the good alternative for cPanel.

Is there someone using this application and what can you tell about or
recommend.

Thank you all.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] latest documentation of OpenStack for CentOS7

[FrancisM]

Dear Gianluca,

Thanks for sharing this information it will take my whole week again to
read the architecture and to understand it. By the way is it recommended to
run the OpenStack on top of ESXi6 for testing purpose? When I provision the
CentOS VMs for this test I append this line 'vhv.enable=true' inside the
.vmx file to support Nested-Environment inside my ESXi6

Its my first time to install and configure OpenStack so I'm wondering if I
will hit some limitation in my VM environment if I setup this inside of VMs
running in CentOS7.2



~The future has many paths - choose wisely.. ./StarWars:CloneWars
~If you only do what you can do, you will never be more than you are..
./Master Shifu

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cec...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:03 AM, FrancisM <fran...@mytechrepublic.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Is there any good and complete material on how to install OpenStack in
> > CentOS out there that is updated that you can share to begin
> configuring. I
> > have followed some documentation in docs.openstack.org and its seems
> like
> > every time i follow one of the module I hit a lot of errors and could not
> > complete the installation.
> >
> >
> Hello,
> for updated documentation for the Openstack Platform product as provided by
> Red Hat starts here:
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-openstack-platform/
> and I think it could be a good starting point anyway.
>
> Please note that I think it requires a particular subscription and that you
> can try it for free going here:
> https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/linux-platforms/openstack-platform
>
> If you want to use CentOS (or also base Red Hat OS but without RH Openstack
> channels) you can go with RDO project:
> https://www.rdoproject.org/
>
> It contains many docs too and in general you can choose differente repo,
> depending on which version of Openstack you want to deploy (current one is
> Newton now)
>
> For more detailed questions/clarifications, ecc I think you can go to:
> https://www.rdoproject.org/community/
> and see the appropriate communication channels
>
> HIH,
> Gianluca
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] latest documentation of OpenStack for CentOS7

[FrancisM]

Hello All,

Is there any good and complete material on how to install OpenStack in
CentOS out there that is updated that you can share to begin configuring. I
have followed some documentation in docs.openstack.org and its seems like
every time i follow one of the module I hit a lot of errors and could not
complete the installation.


-- 


Regards
./Francis

~The future has many paths - choose wisely.
~If you only do what you can do, you will never be more than you are.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Cannot boot CentOS 7 VM after updating Host CentOS 7 Kernel

[FrancisM]

Any error in your host logs?

On Sunday, 30 October 2016, Steven Tardy  wrote:

>
> > On Oct 30, 2016, at 3:27 AM, Paul R. Ganci  > wrote:
> >
> > grub> set root=(hd0,msdos2)
> > grub> linux (hd0,1)/vmlinuz-3.10.0-327.36.2.el7.x86_64
> root=(hd0,msdos2)/
> > grub> initrd initrd-plymouth.img
> > grub> boot
>
> Try the initrd matching the kernel?
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org 
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 spontaneous reboots

[FrancisM]

Check the hardware system health it could be that there is a faulty
component that triggering to reboot or maybe high temperature (overheated)
processor check your hardware fan if still working

On Monday, 30 May 2016, Keith Keller 
wrote:

> Hi Bill,
>
> On 2016-05-30, Bill Gee > wrote:
> >
> > By luck I saw the beginning of a reboot on the server console.  Normally
> I have
> > other systems up on the KVM switch.  It appears to have dumped core.  I
> don't
> > know where to look for the core dump files.  They are not in /root.
>
> One place you might check is under /var/lib.  I think there may be a
> /var/lib/crash directory which contains core dumps.
>
> > I ran MemTest 86+.  No memory errors were found.
>
> Another option is to try Advanced Cluster Breakin, which runs other
> tests besides memory.
>
> http://www.advancedclustering.com/products/software/breakin/
>
> I've had it find problems that memtest hasn't (and vice-versa).
>
> > Lm_sensors shows the processor running between 45 and 50C.
>
> If the system supports IPMI, check those sensors and logs, there may be
> something useful there.  If you don't have IPMI, there may still be
> something in the BIOS logs (how you get to those varies wildly, you may
> need to boot into the BIOS to do it).
>
> I hope that helps!
>
> --keith
>
> --
> kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us 
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org 
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>


-- 

This email or attachments may contain confidential or legally privileged
information intended for the sole use of the addressee(s). Any use,
redistribution, disclosure, or reproduction of this message, except as
intended, is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify
the sender and reformat your hard drive to remove all copies of the
message, including any attachments; failure to do so may result in your
floppy drive being filled with jelly. Any views or opinions expressed in
this email (unless otherwise stated) may not represent those of the Vatican
City, George W Bush, or the Sisters of the Perpetual Motion. Cheers [image:
]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Display boot menu with GRUB_TIMEOUT=0?

[FrancisM]

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Nicolas Kovacs  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On my minimal installation of CentOS 7, here's what I have in
> /etc/default/grub:
>
> GRUB_TIMEOUT=0
> GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="$(sed 's, release .*$,,g' /etc/system-release)"
> GRUB_DEFAULT=saved
> GRUB_DISABLE_SUBMENU=true
> GRUB_TERMINAL_OUTPUT="console"
> GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rd.lvm.lv=centos_amandine/root \
> rd.lvm.lv=centos_amandine/swap \
> video=1024x768 \
> quiet"
> GRUB_DISABLE_RECOVERY="true"
>
> According to the official documentation, pressing any alphanumerical key
> just after the BIOS screen will make the GRUB menu appear. I tried that,
> but to no avail.
>
> Any idea what's the magic combination to make the GRUB boot menu appear
> when GRUB_TIMEOUT is set to 0?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Niki
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

-

have you tried to hold the Shift key?

-- 

This email or attachments may contain confidential or legally privileged
information intended for the sole use of the addressee(s). Any use,
redistribution, disclosure, or reproduction of this message, except as
intended, is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify
the sender and reformat your hard drive to remove all copies of the
message, including any attachments; failure to do so may result in your
floppy drive being filled with jelly. Any views or opinions expressed in
this email (unless otherwise stated) may not represent those of the Vatican
City, George W Bush, or the Sisters of the Perpetual Motion. Cheers [image:
]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Tool to Manage KVM with Web Browser

[FrancisM]

Hi James,
The Archipel looks promising I will look and do POC for both of them
Archipel and WebVirtCloud. Thanks

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 5:37 PM James Hogarth <james.hoga...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 8 April 2016 at 09:52, Morgan Cox <morganco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > https://www.ovirt.org/ ?
> >
> > On 8 April 2016 at 09:23, FrancisM <fran...@mytechrepublic.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Is there someone out there using web browser to manage multiple KVM
> > > host servers right now in checking the MIST.IO Cloud platform and
> there
> > > are
> > > lot more from the http://linux-kvm.org/page/Management_Tools but Im
> not
> > > sure what is the best for me. The first requirement is of-course it
> > should
> > > be open-source with zero cost and stable for daily operation. Anyone
> can
> > > help me decide or advice the best web tools for KVM.
> > >
> > > many thanks
> > >
> >
> >
> oVirt is nice but pretty heavyweight ... depending on your needs I've heard
> good things about Archipel
>
> http://archipelproject.org/
>
> We used WebVirtMgr for a really lightweight thing at previous place ...
> looks like that's changed to WebVirtCloud now.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Tool to Manage KVM with Web Browser

[FrancisM]

Hi All,

Is there someone out there using web browser to manage multiple KVM
host servers right now in checking the MIST.IO Cloud platform and there are
lot more from the http://linux-kvm.org/page/Management_Tools but Im not
sure what is the best for me. The first requirement is of-course it should
be open-source with zero cost and stable for daily operation. Anyone can
help me decide or advice the best web tools for KVM.

many thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] KVM Virtualization Network VLAN CentOS7 (resolve)

[FrancisM]

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:20 PM, FrancisM <fran...@mytechrepublic.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:51 PM, FrancisM <fran...@mytechrepublic.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-li...@agoris.net.ua>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello FrancisM,
>>>
>>> Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is
>>> failing to
>>> > bring-up. So this is what Im doing
>>>
>>> > in my DATA trunk port at my HomeLab Im doing this
>>>
>>> > 2 port configured for teaming1 (set as link only port) -> Create Bridge
>>> > (br0 port) on top of the teaming1 -> create slave vlan10,20,30,40 and
>>> the
>>> > parent is br0. Am I doing this correctly? Thanks
>>>
>>> not exactly.
>>>
>>> nmcli connection add con-name br10 ifname br10 type bridge stp no
>>> nmcli connection down br10
>>> nmcli connection edit br10
>>> set ipv4.method disabled
>>> set ipv6.method ignore
>>> save
>>> quit
>>> nmcli connection up br10
>>>
>>> nmcli  connection  add  con-name  vlan10  ifname  vlan10 type vlan dev
>>> teaming1 id 10
>>> nmcli connection down vlan10
>>> nmcli connection edit vlan10
>>> set connection.master br10
>>> set connection.slave-type bridge
>>> verify fix
>>> save
>>> exit
>>> nmcli connection up vlan10
>>>
>>> similarly for br20+vlan20, br30+vlan30, br40+vlan40
>>>
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for providing the command I will definitely try this method.
>>
>>
> Hi,
>
> After trying the method using the 'nmcli'  its the same error result as
> what I encountered in using the 'nmtui' by the way after configuring then
> check it in the nmtui its the same configuration as what I have done
> earlier.
>
> [root@server network-scripts]# systemctl status network.service -l
> ● network.service - LSB: Bring up/down networking
>Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network)
>Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Tue 2015-04-07 17:19:00 SGT;
> 1min 13s ago
>  Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8)
>   Process: 48732 ExecStop=/etc/rc.d/init.d/network stop (code=exited,
> status=0/SUCCESS)
>   Process: 49302 ExecStart=/etc/rc.d/init.d/network start (code=exited,
> status=1/FAILURE)
>
> Apr 07 17:17:28 server network[49302]: [  OK  ]
> Apr 07 17:17:29 server network[49302]: Bringing up interface
> team1_slave_enp5s0f1:  Connection successfully activated (D-Bus active
> path: /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/69)
> Apr 07 17:17:29 server network[49302]: [  OK  ]
> Apr 07 17:19:00 server network[49302]: *Bringing up interface vlan247:
> Error: Timeout 90 sec expired.*
> Apr 07 17:19:00 server network[49302]: *[FAILED]*
> Apr 07 17:19:00 server network[49302]: Bringing up interface br247:  [
> OK  ]
> Apr 07 17:19:00 server systemd[1]: network.service: control process
> exited, code=exited status=1
> Apr 07 17:19:00 server systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: Bring up/down
> networking.
> Apr 07 17:19:00 server systemd[1]: Unit network.service entered failed
> state.
> Apr 07 17:19:00 server systemd[1]: network.service failed.
> [root@server network-scripts]#
>
> I will try to use other configuration on this bridge. Does it matter if I
> use TEAMING and not BONDING on this bridging configuration because the two
> nic card that is trunk is configured as TEAMING in my CentOS7
>

Thanks all I already figure it out its due to the

*ipv4.method link-only* it shoud be *ipv4.method disabled*

in my teaming1 configuration
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] KVM Virtualization Network VLAN CentOS7

[FrancisM]

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:51 PM, FrancisM <fran...@mytechrepublic.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-li...@agoris.net.ua> wrote:
>
>> Hello FrancisM,
>>
>> Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote:
>>
>>
>> > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is
>> failing to
>> > bring-up. So this is what Im doing
>>
>> > in my DATA trunk port at my HomeLab Im doing this
>>
>> > 2 port configured for teaming1 (set as link only port) -> Create Bridge
>> > (br0 port) on top of the teaming1 -> create slave vlan10,20,30,40 and
>> the
>> > parent is br0. Am I doing this correctly? Thanks
>>
>> not exactly.
>>
>> nmcli connection add con-name br10 ifname br10 type bridge stp no
>> nmcli connection down br10
>> nmcli connection edit br10
>> set ipv4.method disabled
>> set ipv6.method ignore
>> save
>> quit
>> nmcli connection up br10
>>
>> nmcli  connection  add  con-name  vlan10  ifname  vlan10 type vlan dev
>> teaming1 id 10
>> nmcli connection down vlan10
>> nmcli connection edit vlan10
>> set connection.master br10
>> set connection.slave-type bridge
>> verify fix
>> save
>> exit
>> nmcli connection up vlan10
>>
>> similarly for br20+vlan20, br30+vlan30, br40+vlan40
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>
> Thanks for providing the command I will definitely try this method.
>
>
Hi,

After trying the method using the 'nmcli'  its the same error result as
what I encountered in using the 'nmtui' by the way after configuring then
check it in the nmtui its the same configuration as what I have done
earlier.

[root@server network-scripts]# systemctl status network.service -l
● network.service - LSB: Bring up/down networking
   Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network)
   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Tue 2015-04-07 17:19:00 SGT;
1min 13s ago
 Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8)
  Process: 48732 ExecStop=/etc/rc.d/init.d/network stop (code=exited,
status=0/SUCCESS)
  Process: 49302 ExecStart=/etc/rc.d/init.d/network start (code=exited,
status=1/FAILURE)

Apr 07 17:17:28 server network[49302]: [  OK  ]
Apr 07 17:17:29 server network[49302]: Bringing up interface
team1_slave_enp5s0f1:  Connection successfully activated (D-Bus active
path: /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/69)
Apr 07 17:17:29 server network[49302]: [  OK  ]
Apr 07 17:19:00 server network[49302]: *Bringing up interface vlan247:
Error: Timeout 90 sec expired.*
Apr 07 17:19:00 server network[49302]: *[FAILED]*
Apr 07 17:19:00 server network[49302]: Bringing up interface br247:  [  OK
]
Apr 07 17:19:00 server systemd[1]: network.service: control process exited,
code=exited status=1
Apr 07 17:19:00 server systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: Bring up/down
networking.
Apr 07 17:19:00 server systemd[1]: Unit network.service entered failed
state.
Apr 07 17:19:00 server systemd[1]: network.service failed.
[root@server network-scripts]#

I will try to use other configuration on this bridge. Does it matter if I
use TEAMING and not BONDING on this bridging configuration because the two
nic card that is trunk is configured as TEAMING in my CentOS7
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] KVM Virtualization Network VLAN CentOS7

[FrancisM]

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Subscriber <ml-li...@agoris.net.ua> wrote:

> Hello FrancisM,
>
> Thursday, April 7, 2016, 8:03:38 AM, you wrote:
>
>
> > I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is failing
> to
> > bring-up. So this is what Im doing
>
> > in my DATA trunk port at my HomeLab Im doing this
>
> > 2 port configured for teaming1 (set as link only port) -> Create Bridge
> > (br0 port) on top of the teaming1 -> create slave vlan10,20,30,40 and the
> > parent is br0. Am I doing this correctly? Thanks
>
> not exactly.
>
> nmcli connection add con-name br10 ifname br10 type bridge stp no
> nmcli connection down br10
> nmcli connection edit br10
> set ipv4.method disabled
> set ipv6.method ignore
> save
> quit
> nmcli connection up br10
>
> nmcli  connection  add  con-name  vlan10  ifname  vlan10 type vlan dev
> teaming1 id 10
> nmcli connection down vlan10
> nmcli connection edit vlan10
> set connection.master br10
> set connection.slave-type bridge
> verify fix
> save
> exit
> nmcli connection up vlan10
>
> similarly for br20+vlan20, br30+vlan30, br40+vlan40
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

Thanks for providing the command I will definitely try this method.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] KVM Virtualization Network VLAN CentOS7

[FrancisM]

On Thursday, 7 April 2016, James Hogarth  wrote:

> On 6 April 2016 at 19:21, Subscriber  > wrote:
>
> > Hello James,
> >
> > Wednesday, April 6, 2016, 5:34:26 PM, you wrote:
> >
> > > Note that this is pretty much the last use case you cannot use
> > > NetworkManager for but need the legacy network service ... to save you
> > some
> > > pain in trying to configure it ;)
> > I disagree... NetworkManager works perfectly.
> >
> >
> >
> Ah I recall slightly incorrectly form my testing last May ... to be fair
> it's been nearly a year since I last looked at this ;)
>
> https://www.hogarthuk.com/?q=node/8
>
> it's nmcli specifically that wouldn't work as the bridge slave had an
> ethernet type requirement so wouldn't work if the type was bond or vlan
>
> NM was able to create the connection from the file configuration however
>  my apologies
>
> Here's the bug with the limitation due to be fixed in the upcoming 7.3
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183420
>
> That's one less reason to use the legacy network service then!
> _
>

I tried last night and it seems like the vlans that I created is failing to
bring-up. So this is what Im doing

in my DATA trunk port at my HomeLab Im doing this

2 port configured for teaming1 (set as link only port) -> Create Bridge
(br0 port) on top of the teaming1 -> create slave vlan10,20,30,40 and the
parent is br0. Am I doing this correctly? Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos