Re: [CentOS] SquidGuard update in EPEL

[Gwaland]

looks like it was updated due to a segfault.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750550
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253662



On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 1:03 PM Nicolas Kovacs  wrote:

> Le 29/09/2019 à 18:48, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit :
> > Is there a problem with the version which is in EPEL?
>
> No, there isn't.
>
> I was just puzzled that there was an update to an application that's
> been manifestly dormant for more than ten years.
>
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
> 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
> Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
> Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
> Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
> Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Opinions on using CR repository in production environments.

[Gwaland]

I was wondering what people's opinions are on running the CR repository on
production systems?  I'm currently predisposed to not do it since it
indicates it hasn't fully gone through QA yet.  But from my understanding
except for the alt-arch systems these are just recompiles of the redhat
RPMs after debranding right?

I'm Curious how other people are treating this repository since, from the
sounds of it, rpms are going to be in holding here between releases.

So would you treat it as a production repository or for testing only?  Do
we know how it's actually intended to be treated?

Any opinion is appreciated.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos