from:"Jean\-Marc Liger"

Re: [CentOS-virt] Mitel only supported VMware virtualization platform for some CentOS servers based products

2018-07-16 Thread Jean-Marc Liger


Hi,

I finaly find enough legal stuff, from the French government 
recommandations, to qualify our CentOS KVM/libvirt as a platform we can use.


By the way the legal advisory of KVM is not as the save level as its 
technical quality :



Le 11/07/2018 à 18:07, Jean-Marc Liger a écrit :


Hi,

Some Mitel products, which are CentOS 6.x or 7.x servers based with 
some telephony services added, are only supported on VMware 
virtualisation platform, even all if theses CentOS guests are 
certified on last CentOS/Redhat Virtualization or Microsoft Hyper V 
platforms.


So, at he moment we have three bad choices :
- Migrate part of our virtualization services from KVM/libvirt to VMware ;
- Install Mitel concerned product on a physical server ;
- Stay on KVM/libvirt and lose Mitel support for this product.

I'm seeking for technical/legal arguments which could help us to stay 
on KVM/libvirt without losing Mitel support.


Regards,

--

*Jean-Marc LIGER
Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseaux de Communication
*
FACULTÉ DE MÉDECINE
Direction Technique, Informatique, Réseaux et Multimédia
15 rue de l’École de Médecine – 75270 Paris cedex 06
Tél : +33 (0)1 76 53 00 71



___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

[CentOS-virt] Mitel only supported VMware virtualization platform for some CentOS servers based products

2018-07-11 Thread Jean-Marc Liger


Hi,

Some Mitel products, which are CentOS 6.x or 7.x servers based with some 
telephony services added, are only supported on VMware virtualisation 
platform, even all if theses CentOS guests are certified on last 
CentOS/Redhat Virtualization or Microsoft Hyper V platforms.


So, at he moment we have three bad choises :
- Migrate part of our virtualization services from KVM/libvirt to VMware ;
- Install Mitel concerned product on a physical server ;
- Stay on KVM/libvirt and lose Mitel support for this product.

I'm seeking for technical/legal arguments which could help us to stay on 
KVM/libvirt without losing Mitel support.


Regards,

--

*Jean-Marc LIGER
Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseaux de Communication
*
FACULTÉ DE MÉDECINE
Direction Technique, Informatique, Réseaux et Multimédia
15 rue de l’École de Médecine – 75270 Paris cedex 06
Tél : +33 (0)1 76 53 00 71

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

[CentOS-virt] Kimchi and noVNC

2018-02-23 Thread Jean-Marc Liger


Hi,

I've rebuild Kimchi/Wok 2.5.0 based on ClearOS packages. I've also 
upgraded noVNC 1.0.0. Unfortunatly the QEMUExtendedKeyEvent which fixes 
French keyboard's detection doesn't work for me at the moment.


But maybe, the problem is located in my QEMU 2.11.0 implementation.

If someone want to digg his own way ?

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/builds/

*Jean-Marc LIGER
Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseaux de Communication
*
FACULTÉ DE MÉDECINE
Direction Technique, Informatique, Réseaux et Multimédia
15 rue de l’École de Médecine – 75270 Paris cedex 06
Tél : +33 (0)1 76 53 00 71

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] Red Hat VirtIO SCSI pass-through controller

2017-03-15 Thread Jean-Marc LIGER


Le 14/03/2017 à 19:05, Gena Makhomed a écrit :


Hello, All!

virtio-win.iso contains two different Windows drivers.
these Windows Server 2012 R2 drivers have different hardware IDs:

\vioscsi\2k12R2\amd64\vioscsi.inf
"Red Hat VirtIO SCSI pass-through controller"
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1004_00081AF4_00
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1048_11001AF4_01

\viostor\2k12R2\amd64\viostor.inf
"Red Hat VirtIO SCSI controller"
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1001_00021AF4_00
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1042_11001AF4_01

When I use "VirtIO SCSI controller" in virt-manager,
and when I install Windows Server 2012 R2 -
I can use only viostor driver and can't use vioscsi driver,
Windows Server 2012 R2 can't load vioscsi driver (?)
from virtio-win.iso and did not see virtual hard disks
with vioscsi driver. Only viostor driver work normally.

How I can use "Red Hat VirtIO SCSI pass-through controller"
for Windows Server 2012 R2 virtual machine, what I need
to configure in xml-config?

current /etc/libvirt/qemu/windows.xml config:

   
  function='0x0'/>




  discard='unmap'/>

  
  
  
  function='0x0'/>



Additional info:


virtio-win.iso version: virtio-win-0.1.126.iso
from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Windows_Virtio_Drivers


Maybe you can try the lastest virtio-win-0.1.133.iso :
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virtio-win/direct-downloads/latest-virtio/virtio-win.iso

Or try to reinstall the latest spice guest tools 0.132 :
https://www.spice-space.org/download/binaries/spice-guest-tools/spice-guest-tools-latest.exe



OS: CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core)

QEMU: qemu-kvm-1.5.3-126.el7_3.5.x86_64


Why don't you upgrade qemu-kvm to qemu-kvm-ev ?


Windows Server 2012 R2 MSDN installation ISO image:
en_windows_server_2012_r2_with_update_x64_dvd_6052708.iso
sha1sum: 865494e969704be1c4496d8614314361d025775e
size: 5397889024 bytes

devcon.exe output inside Windows Server 2012 R2 Virtual Machine:

PCI\VEN_1AF4_1001_00021AF4_00\3&13C0B0C5&0&40
Name: Red Hat VirtIO SCSI controller
Hardware IDs:
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1001_00021AF4_00
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1001_00021AF4
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1001_01
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1001_0100
Compatible IDs:
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1001_00
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1001
PCI\VEN_1AF4_01
PCI\VEN_1AF4_0100
PCI\VEN_1AF4
PCI\CC_01
PCI\CC_0100
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1001_00021AF4_00\3&13C0B0C5&0&50
Name: Red Hat VirtIO SCSI controller
Hardware IDs:
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1001_00021AF4_00
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1001_00021AF4
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1001_01
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1001_0100
Compatible IDs:
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1001_00
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1001
PCI\VEN_1AF4_01
PCI\VEN_1AF4_0100
PCI\VEN_1AF4
PCI\CC_01
PCI\CC_0100
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1004_00081AF4_00\3&13C0B0C5&0&38
Name: Red Hat VirtIO SCSI controller
Hardware IDs:
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1004_00081AF4_00
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1004_00081AF4
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1004_01
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1004_0100
Compatible IDs:
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1004_00
PCI\VEN_1AF4_1004
PCI\VEN_1AF4_01
PCI\VEN_1AF4_0100
PCI\VEN_1AF4
PCI\CC_01
PCI\CC_0100



___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] Updated libvirt packages (2.2.0-1) in testing

2017-01-06 Thread Jean-Marc Liger


Le 05/01/2017 à 18:29, George Dunlap a écrit :

The CentOS 7.3 release updated to libvirt 2.0,  which is now taking
precedence over the previous virt sig libvirt packages (which were
1.3).

I've pulled in the changes from Fedora 25, which uses libvirt 2.2.0.
I've built and tested them for CentOS 7 and they work for me.  (I'm
having some infrastructure issue testing C6.)

Please test them if you have an opportunity.  I'll leave them there
for a week and then push them to release if I don't have any
complaints.


Hi Georges,

You should pick last libvirt packages directly from 
ftp://ftp.libvirt.org/libvirt/ as they maintain compatibility for both 
C6 and C7.


Regards,
Jean-Marc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] yum update Failing with libvirt-daemon error

2016-12-31 Thread Jean-Marc Liger

Jiri Denemark has already proposed to help rebuild libvirt for 
CentOS-Xen but I don't know if he got all that is need to do so ?


Maybe I could help also, but I would have to learn the Centos build 
system first.


Regards,
Jean-Marc

Le 31/12/2016 à 08:46, Francis The Metman a écrit :

Dear Jean-Marc, Thank you for replying.
I Installed CentOS 7 and centos-virt from the normal repos (CentOS-Xen) in 
December 2015 and have not had to build anything. I am running CentOS 7, not 
sure if it has automatically updated itself to 7.3,  so I would expect the 
updates to come from the repo, and not need building from source.
Regards
Francis


- Original Message -

From: "Jean-Marc Liger" <jean-marc.li...@parisdescartes.fr>
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" <centos-virt@centos.org>
Sent: Saturday, 31 December, 2016 1:24:44 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] yum update Failing with libvirt-daemon error

As libvirt from Xen is 1.3.0 and libvirt from CentOS 7.3 is now
2.0.0,
libvirt from Xen has to be rebuild to upgrade the new libvirt 2.0.0

See my previous post :
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2016-November/005255.html

I've done it for my own repo :
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/

Regards,
Jean-Marc

Le 30/12/2016 à 17:56, Francis The Metman a écrit :

PJ
My server is critical to me, but not the public, fortunately.
I can take it down as I suggested, but am a bit reluctant to do so
until I have heard more opinions.
Presumably your system update failed using your script, so it will
probably fail for me if I copy it.
I will keep a copy anyway.


- Original Message -

From: "PJ Welsh" <pjwe...@gmail.com>
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS"
<centos-virt@centos.org>
Sent: Friday, 30 December, 2016 2:14:07 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] yum update Failing with libvirt-daemon
error



It may be worth a try if you can bring down your systems to do
that.
I have 4 productions servers in this state with no test option at
this moment that is running CentOS 7.3 (the dev box is running 6.8
with same same Xen version).
It realy seems odd that only 2 of us have noticed this or have
this
issue. I have a very basic install on those servers. Along the
lines
that you are thinking, my standard (manual) minor version update
practice for many years on all of my servers has been a
recommended
script with:
#!/bin/bash

yum -y update glibc\*

yum -y update yum\* rpm\* pyth\*
yum -y update mkinitrd nash

yum -y update selinux\*
yum -y update --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=base,updates,custom
--skip-broken
yum -y update --skip-broken



This effectively eliminates the Xen repo until the very end of any
updates.


Thanks
PJ


On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Francis The Metman <
themet...@themetman.net > wrote:


I am still waiting in hope someone will have an idea on what to
do.
Perhaps I should do this:-

boot into a normal kernel
uninstall centos-virt
update the system
reinstall centos-virt

What do you think?
Francis



- Original Message -

From: "PJ Welsh" < pjwe...@gmail.com >
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" <
centos-virt@centos.org >
Sent: Thursday, 29 December, 2016 6:42:21 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] yum update Failing with libvirt-daemon
error



Anyone have an idea of what may have happened or how to fix? I'm
only
seeing this issue after the OS update to CentOS 7.3.
Thanks
PJ


On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 10:19 AM, PJ Welsh < pjwe...@gmail.com >
wrote:



I'v also got this issue when trying to update my CentOS 7.3
systems.
I did see a new user request that mentioned beginning to help
with
libvrit 2.0 and/or 2.5 updates. Just not sure what to do in the
short term? Any hints/help would be appreciated:

Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: mirrors.cmich.edu
* elrepo: mirrors.netix.net
* epel: mirror.cs.princeton.edu
* extras: centos.mirrors.hoobly.com
* updates: mirror.spro.net
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package libguestfs.x86_64 1:1.28.1-1.55.el7.centos.4 will be
updated
---> Package libguestfs.x86_64 1:1.32.7-3.el7.centos will be an
update
---> Package libguestfs-tools.noarch 1:1.28.1-1.55.el7.centos.4
will
be updated
---> Package libguestfs-tools.noarch 1:1.32.7-3.el7.centos will
be
an
update
---> Package libguestfs-tools-c.x86_64 1:1.28.1-1.55.el7.centos.4
will be updated
---> Package libguestfs-tools-c.x86_64 1:1.32.7-3.el7.centos will
be
an update
---> Package libvirt.x86_64 0:1.3.0-1.el7 will be updated
---> Package libvirt.x86_64 0:2.0.0-10.el7_3.2 will be an update
---> Package libvirt-client.x86_64 0:1.3.0-1.el7 will be updated
---> Package libvirt-client.x86_64 0:2.0.0-10.el7_3.2 will be an
update
---> Package libvirt-daemon.x86_64 0:1.3.0-1.el7 will be updated
--> Processing Dependenc

Re: [CentOS-virt] yum update Failing with libvirt-daemon error

2016-12-30 Thread Jean-Marc Liger

As libvirt from Xen is 1.3.0 and libvirt from CentOS 7.3 is now 2.0.0, 
libvirt from Xen has to be rebuild to upgrade the new libvirt 2.0.0


See my previous post : 
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2016-November/005255.html


I've done it for my own repo : 
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/


Regards,
Jean-Marc

Le 30/12/2016 à 17:56, Francis The Metman a écrit :

PJ
My server is critical to me, but not the public, fortunately.
I can take it down as I suggested, but am a bit reluctant to do so until I have 
heard more opinions.
Presumably your system update failed using your script, so it will probably 
fail for me if I copy it.
I will keep a copy anyway.


- Original Message -

From: "PJ Welsh" 
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" 
Sent: Friday, 30 December, 2016 2:14:07 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] yum update Failing with libvirt-daemon error



It may be worth a try if you can bring down your systems to do that.
I have 4 productions servers in this state with no test option at
this moment that is running CentOS 7.3 (the dev box is running 6.8
with same same Xen version).
It realy seems odd that only 2 of us have noticed this or have this
issue. I have a very basic install on those servers. Along the lines
that you are thinking, my standard (manual) minor version update
practice for many years on all of my servers has been a recommended
script with:
#!/bin/bash

yum -y update glibc\*

yum -y update yum\* rpm\* pyth\*
yum -y update mkinitrd nash

yum -y update selinux\*
yum -y update --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=base,updates,custom
--skip-broken
yum -y update --skip-broken



This effectively eliminates the Xen repo until the very end of any
updates.


Thanks
PJ


On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Francis The Metman <
themet...@themetman.net > wrote:


I am still waiting in hope someone will have an idea on what to do.
Perhaps I should do this:-

boot into a normal kernel
uninstall centos-virt
update the system
reinstall centos-virt

What do you think?
Francis



- Original Message -

From: "PJ Welsh" < pjwe...@gmail.com >
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" <
centos-virt@centos.org >
Sent: Thursday, 29 December, 2016 6:42:21 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] yum update Failing with libvirt-daemon
error



Anyone have an idea of what may have happened or how to fix? I'm
only
seeing this issue after the OS update to CentOS 7.3.
Thanks
PJ


On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 10:19 AM, PJ Welsh < pjwe...@gmail.com >
wrote:



I'v also got this issue when trying to update my CentOS 7.3
systems.
I did see a new user request that mentioned beginning to help with
libvrit 2.0 and/or 2.5 updates. Just not sure what to do in the
short term? Any hints/help would be appreciated:

Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: mirrors.cmich.edu
* elrepo: mirrors.netix.net
* epel: mirror.cs.princeton.edu
* extras: centos.mirrors.hoobly.com
* updates: mirror.spro.net
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package libguestfs.x86_64 1:1.28.1-1.55.el7.centos.4 will be
updated
---> Package libguestfs.x86_64 1:1.32.7-3.el7.centos will be an
update
---> Package libguestfs-tools.noarch 1:1.28.1-1.55.el7.centos.4
will
be updated
---> Package libguestfs-tools.noarch 1:1.32.7-3.el7.centos will be
an
update
---> Package libguestfs-tools-c.x86_64 1:1.28.1-1.55.el7.centos.4
will be updated
---> Package libguestfs-tools-c.x86_64 1:1.32.7-3.el7.centos will
be
an update
---> Package libvirt.x86_64 0:1.3.0-1.el7 will be updated
---> Package libvirt.x86_64 0:2.0.0-10.el7_3.2 will be an update
---> Package libvirt-client.x86_64 0:1.3.0-1.el7 will be updated
---> Package libvirt-client.x86_64 0:2.0.0-10.el7_3.2 will be an
update
---> Package libvirt-daemon.x86_64 0:1.3.0-1.el7 will be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libvirt-daemon = 1.3.0-1.el7 for
package:
libvirt-daemon-driver-libxl-1.3.0-1.el7.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libvirt-daemon = 1.3.0-1.el7 for
package:
libvirt-daemon-xen-1.3.0-1.el7.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libvirt-daemon = 1.3.0-1.el7 for
package:
libvirt-daemon-driver-xen-1.3.0-1.el7.x86_64
---> Package libvirt-daemon.x86_64 0:2.0.0-10.el7_3.2 will be an
update
---> Package libvirt-daemon-config-network.x86_64 0:1.3.0-1.el7
will
be updated
---> Package libvirt-daemon-config-network.x86_64
0:2.0.0-10.el7_3.2
will be an update
---> Package libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter.x86_64 0:1.3.0-1.el7
will
be updated
---> Package libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter.x86_64
0:2.0.0-10.el7_3.2
will be an update
---> Package libvirt-daemon-driver-interface.x86_64 0:1.3.0-1.el7
will be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libvirt-daemon-driver-interface =
1.3.0-1.el7 for package: libvirt-daemon-xen-1.3.0-1.el7.x86_64
---> Package libvirt-daemon-driver-interface.x86_64
0:2.0.0-10.el7_3.2 will be an update
---> Package libvirt-daemon-driver-lxc.x86_64

[CentOS-virt] Last Mesa with VirGL support

2016-07-12 Thread Jean-Marc Liger


Hi,

If you are interested in giving some testing, I've rebuilt from Fedora 
the last Mesa stack with VirGL 3D and others drivers enabled.


https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/

Regards,
Jean-Marc Liger


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] [x-post] Upstream possible patches to libvirt to enable building upstream libvirt packages with libxl

2016-06-07 Thread Jean-Marc Liger




Le 19/05/2016 16:51, Jean-Marc Liger a écrit :

Le 18/05/2016 22:11, Le Nucksi a écrit :

Jean-Marc Liger <jean-marc.liger@...> writes:


Le 15/05/2016 à 20:42, Le Nucksi a écrit :


On 05/14/2016 07:16 AM, Le Nucksi wrote:

Hello list,

is there a way to get more recent libvirt builds for CentOS 7 that 
include

support for the xl (modern Xen) toolstack?

Hy,

I am maintening the firt mentionned repo. I personnaly don't use xen 
but

I planned to include xen support for the next libvirt release and I had
already rebuilt the last xen packages from Virt SIG for this purpose. I
have just rebuilt the current libvirt with xen and libxsl enabled.

Hello Jean-Marc,

good to have found you here and thank you very much for your work!
I've just installed them and up to now they appear to work flawlessly.
I'ld come back to you if I find something unflawless if that is ok 
for you.


Hello Le,

Even if I can't offer full and strong support, I should try to 
investigate if something was going wrong.


Hi Le,

I've just rebuild libvirt 1.3.5.

JML


Best regards,
Jean-Marc Liger

Best regards,
Le
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] [x-post] Upstream possible patches to libvirt to enable building upstream libvirt packages with libxl

2016-05-16 Thread Jean-Marc Liger


Le 15/05/2016 à 20:42, Le Nucksi a écrit :


On 05/14/2016 07:16 AM, Le Nucksi wrote:

Hello list,

is there a way to get more recent libvirt builds for CentOS 7 that include
support for the xl (modern Xen) toolstack?

I tried to build libvirt from the SRPM, which succeeded, however, without
the mentioned Xen parts.
I have also found two repos from people who provide upstream libvirt builds
for CentOS 7, again, without the Xen parts.
- https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/ and
- https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:aevseev/libvirt

Within the CentOS virtualization SIG builds for Xen there is a 1.3.x build
of libvirt that includes support for the modern Xen toolstack.
Would it be possible to inline this into the upstream to enable building it
with Xen features on CentOS 7 such that the aforementioned people's RPMs
would contain it?

I appreciate any enlightment on the topic.

I think you should either contact the owners of those libvirt repos, or
contact the centos virt sig. I don't know if anyone on these lists is directly
involved with those repos

- Cole



Hy,

I am maintening the firt mentionned repo. I personnaly don't use xen but 
I planned to include xen support for the next libvirt release and I had 
already rebuilt the last xen packages from Virt SIG for this purpose. I 
have just rebuilt the current libvirt with xen and libxsl enabled.


Best regards,
Jean-Marc Liger


Hello list,

I emailed the libvirt-users list to see if there would be a way to get more
recent libvirt builds into my CentOS 7 + VIRT SIG/Xen packages.

Here's what Cole Robinson from RedHat replied on that matter. Also the
initial email.

I'd appreciate your feedback on this. The more recent libvirt builds appear
to include quite some improvements especially for the libxl parts.

Best regards,
Le

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] Mouse and display issues with Windows 10 guest

2016-01-27 Thread Jean-Marc LIGER




Le 27/01/2016 15:24, Robert Nichols a écrit :

On 01/27/2016 07:34 AM, Dmitry E. Mikhailov wrote:

On 27.01.2016 00:51, Robert Nichols wrote:


Any suggestions or success reports would be appreciated.


What's the host OS?

I enjoy Windows 8.1 (virtio/qxl) on CentOS 7.2 laptop (the one I'm
writing now on).


CentOS 6.7. Sorry I forgot to mention that.

As I said, Windows 7 runs just fine in a couple of VMs.

One thing I haven't tried is removing the virtio drivers that got
carried over in the Windows 7 -> 10 upgrade. I haven't found any
virtio drivers labeled for use with Windows 10. (How the heck you
uninstall a driver that's no longer associated with any device is
going to take a bit of searching.)



You can use the virtio drivers for Windows 8.1
JML
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] kvm-qemu-ev in testing

2015-11-30 Thread Jean-Marc LIGER


Le 31/10/2015 01:52, Gena Makhomed a écrit :

On 29.10.2015 0:00, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:


it will be in http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/
enabled by
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos-release-qemu-ev-1.0-1.el7.noarch.rpm 



Is it possible to add patch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248758
into qemu-kvm-ev from Red Hat, oVirt and cbs/centos ?

Rebuilding each qemu-kvm-ev from sources is just wasting of time.



Hy,

Could you rediff this patch for qemu-kvm-ev 2.3.0 series ?

JML
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests

2015-11-08 Thread Jean-Marc LIGER




Le 04/11/2015 12:19, Johnny Hughes a écrit :

On 11/04/2015 04:31 AM, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote:


Le 03/11/2015 00:49, Jean-Marc LIGER a écrit :

Le 02/11/2015 18:28, Johnny Hughes a écrit :

On 10/31/2015 04:34 PM, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote:

Hi Lucian,

It seems to be upstream libvirt-1.2.15-2 with options with_xen and
with_libxl enabled.
http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1348


Right, and we can use that version, or a newer one and enable rbd as well.

You might use this preview one :
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs-RHEL-7.2-preview/libvirt-1.2.17-3.el7.src.rpm

I personally rebuild libvirt from last official releases which enable
ceph by default for el7 :
http://libvirt.org/sources/

My dogfooding tests still **can be found here :
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/


The next question is, is there a difference between the generic rbd and
building against ceph-devel.  (As in, is one ceph only and the other
generic only or can you use both when built against ceph-devel, etc)

Since qemu-kvm-ev enables ceph, if we can also enable ceph in libvirt,
seems like a win to me, if it also does rbd the same as building against
librados2-devel and librbd1-devel.

Maybe I'm wrong but ceph-devel seems to have been replaced by librados2-devel 
and librbd1-devel in el7.

%package devel-compat
Summary:Compatibility package for Ceph headers
Group:  Development/Libraries
License:LGPL-2.0
Obsoletes:  ceph-devel
Requires:   %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Requires:   librados2-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Requires:   libradosstriper1-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Requires:   librbd1-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Requires:   libcephfs1-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Requires:   libcephfs_jni1-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Provides:   ceph-devel
%description devel-compat
This is a compatibility package to accommodate ceph-devel split into
librados2-devel, librbd1-devel and libcephfs1-devel. Packages still
depending
on ceph-devel should be fixed to depend on librados2-devel, librbd1-devel,
libcephfs1-devel or libradosstriper1-devel instead.


I concur that the spec file uses that the way it is written.  What I
wonder is *IF* one wants to use ceph specifically, then are libvirt
packages built against librados2-devel and librbd1-devel going to work
then as well?

I do concur that it seems in the beta for rhel-7.2 this all gets
resolved for 7.2.  Since that should be happening soon(ish) .. based on
previous release history, we should wait and see exactly what is in 7.2
when released.

We also need to test that with ceph community packages to see if rbd
built that way actually works with ceph as well.


For whom wants to test, I've rebuild the last ceph community packages 
and libvirt rhel-7.2 preview on top of them in COPR :

https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/tests-upstream/builds/


These may only work with CentOS 7 as well .. have to look at if those
build in CentOS 6.7.

Which ceph release forCentOS 6.7Hammer or Firefly ?
Jean-Marc Liger




___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests

2015-11-04 Thread Jean-Marc LIGER




Le 03/11/2015 00:49, Jean-Marc LIGER a écrit :


Le 02/11/2015 18:28, Johnny Hughes a écrit :

On 10/31/2015 04:34 PM, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote:

Hi Lucian,

It seems to be upstream libvirt-1.2.15-2 with options with_xen and
with_libxl enabled.
http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1348


Right, and we can use that version, or a newer one and enable rbd as well.


You might use this preview one :
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs-RHEL-7.2-preview/libvirt-1.2.17-3.el7.src.rpm

I personally rebuild libvirt from last official releases which enable 
ceph by default for el7 :

http://libvirt.org/sources/

My dogfooding tests still **can be found here :
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/


The next question is, is there a difference between the generic rbd and
building against ceph-devel.  (As in, is one ceph only and the other
generic only or can you use both when built against ceph-devel, etc)

Since qemu-kvm-ev enables ceph, if we can also enable ceph in libvirt,
seems like a win to me, if it also does rbd the same as building against
librados2-devel and librbd1-devel.

Maybe I'm wrong but ceph-devel seems to have been replaced by librados2-devel 
and librbd1-devel in el7.


%package devel-compat
Summary:Compatibility package for Ceph headers
Group:  Development/Libraries
License:LGPL-2.0
Obsoletes:  ceph-devel
Requires:   %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Requires:   librados2-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Requires:   libradosstriper1-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Requires:   librbd1-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Requires:   libcephfs1-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Requires:   libcephfs_jni1-devel = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Provides:   ceph-devel
%description devel-compat
This is a compatibility package to accommodate ceph-devel split into
librados2-devel, librbd1-devel and libcephfs1-devel. Packages still 
depending

on ceph-devel should be fixed to depend on librados2-devel, librbd1-devel,
libcephfs1-devel or libradosstriper1-devel instead.


These may only work with CentOS 7 as well .. have to look at if those
build in CentOS 6.7.


Which ceph release forCentOS 6.7Hammer or Firefly ?
Jean-Marc Liger


Thoughts?

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes



Regards,
Jean-Marc

Le 28/10/2015 09:38, Nux! a écrit :

Pasi,

Where are these RPMs, how are they built, what exactly are the
differences vs the stock ones?

Regards,
Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen"<pa...@iki.fi>
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS"
<centos-virt@centos.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 28 October, 2015 08:36:18
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:19:16PM +, Nux! wrote:

To clarify my own request:

RBD (for CEPH) support is available in the version bundled in RHEL
7.2 Beta, so
we'll have it in CentOS 7.2 (or whatever will be the identifying
number).

The hooks seems just like a matter of creating files in the correct
location.

..So, all is good in the world once again.


Except the VirtSIG provides a different version/build of libvirt
rpms, so we
still need to enable RBD/Ceph support separately in VirtSIG provided
version..


-- Pasi


Regards,
Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Nux!"<n...@li.nux.ro>
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS"
<centos-virt@centos.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 27 October, 2015 15:22:27
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests
So... how exactly do we proceed?

Anyone from the Virt SIG, please stand up?

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen"<pa...@iki.fi>
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS"
<centos-virt@centos.org>
Sent: Sunday, 25 October, 2015 11:02:22
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 05:44:20PM +0100, Nux! wrote:

Hi folks,


Hi,


I know you're rebuilding livbirt for the SIG. Would it be
possible to enable RBD
support in it?


Yes, we should definitely enable RBD / Ceph support in libvirt!




I know quite a few cases (in the Cloudstack community) that
switched to Ubuntu
particularly because CEPH support was missing.
The recommendation is to rebuild the rpms, but this is not a
viable thing for
everyone. E.g.
http://blog.widodh.nl/2015/04/rebuilding-libvirt-under-centos-7-1-with-rbd-storage-pool-support/


Another thing that I noticed on the CentOS ml recently is an
alleged lack of
hooks,https://www.libvirt.org/hooks.html

And last but not least, where could I find the libvirt (s)rpms
that the SIG
produces?

Lucian


-- Pasi



___
CentO

Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests http://libvirt.org/sources/

2015-11-02 Thread Jean-Marc LIGER



Le 02/11/2015 18:28, Johnny Hughes a écrit :

On 10/31/2015 04:34 PM, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote:

Hi Lucian,

It seems to be upstream libvirt-1.2.15-2 with options with_xen and
with_libxl enabled.
http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1348


Right, and we can use that version, or a newer one and enable rbd as well.


You might use this preview one :
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs-RHEL-7.2-preview/libvirt-1.2.17-3.el7.src.rpm

I personally rebuild libvirt from last official releases which enable 
ceph by default for el7 :

http://libvirt.org/sources/

My dogfooding tests still **can be found here :
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/


The next question is, is there a difference between the generic rbd and
building against ceph-devel.  (As in, is one ceph only and the other
generic only or can you use both when built against ceph-devel, etc)

Since qemu-kvm-ev enables ceph, if we can also enable ceph in libvirt,
seems like a win to me, if it also does rbd the same as building against
librados2-devel and librbd1-devel.


Maybe I'm wrong but ceph-devel seems to have been replaced by librados2-devel 
and librbd1-devel in el7.


These may only work with CentOS 7 as well .. have to look at if those
build in CentOS 6.7.


Which ceph release forCentOS 6.7Hammer or Firefly ?
Jean-Marc Liger


Thoughts?

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes



Regards,
Jean-Marc

Le 28/10/2015 09:38, Nux! a écrit :

Pasi,

Where are these RPMs, how are they built, what exactly are the
differences vs the stock ones?

Regards,
Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pa...@iki.fi>
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS"
<centos-virt@centos.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 28 October, 2015 08:36:18
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:19:16PM +, Nux! wrote:

To clarify my own request:

RBD (for CEPH) support is available in the version bundled in RHEL
7.2 Beta, so
we'll have it in CentOS 7.2 (or whatever will be the identifying
number).

The hooks seems just like a matter of creating files in the correct
location.

..So, all is good in the world once again.


Except the VirtSIG provides a different version/build of libvirt
rpms, so we
still need to enable RBD/Ceph support separately in VirtSIG provided
version..


-- Pasi


Regards,
Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Nux!" <n...@li.nux.ro>
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS"
<centos-virt@centos.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 27 October, 2015 15:22:27
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests
So... how exactly do we proceed?

Anyone from the Virt SIG, please stand up?

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pa...@iki.fi>
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS"
<centos-virt@centos.org>
Sent: Sunday, 25 October, 2015 11:02:22
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 05:44:20PM +0100, Nux! wrote:

Hi folks,


Hi,


I know you're rebuilding livbirt for the SIG. Would it be
possible to enable RBD
support in it?


Yes, we should definitely enable RBD / Ceph support in libvirt!




I know quite a few cases (in the Cloudstack community) that
switched to Ubuntu
particularly because CEPH support was missing.
The recommendation is to rebuild the rpms, but this is not a
viable thing for
everyone. E.g.
http://blog.widodh.nl/2015/04/rebuilding-libvirt-under-centos-7-1-with-rbd-storage-pool-support/


Another thing that I noticed on the CentOS ml recently is an
alleged lack of
hooks, https://www.libvirt.org/hooks.html

And last but not least, where could I find the libvirt (s)rpms
that the SIG
produces?

Lucian


-- Pasi



___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests

2015-11-02 Thread Jean-Marc LIGER



Le 02/11/2015 18:28, Johnny Hughes a écrit :

On 10/31/2015 04:34 PM, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote:

Hi Lucian,

It seems to be upstream libvirt-1.2.15-2 with options with_xen and
with_libxl enabled.
http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1348


Right, and we can use that version, or a newer one and enable rbd as well.


You might use this preview one :
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs-RHEL-7.2-preview/libvirt-1.2.17-3.el7.src.rpm

I personally rebuild libvirt from last official releases which enable 
ceph by default for el7 :

http://libvirt.org/sources/

My dogfooding tests still **can be found here :
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/


The next question is, is there a difference between the generic rbd and
building against ceph-devel.  (As in, is one ceph only and the other
generic only or can you use both when built against ceph-devel, etc)

Since qemu-kvm-ev enables ceph, if we can also enable ceph in libvirt,
seems like a win to me, if it also does rbd the same as building against
librados2-devel and librbd1-devel.


Maybe I'm wrong but ceph-devel seems to have been replaced by librados2-devel 
and librbd1-devel in el7.


These may only work with CentOS 7 as well .. have to look at if those
build in CentOS 6.7.


Which ceph release forCentOS 6.7Hammer or Firefly ?
Jean-Marc Liger


Thoughts?

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes



Regards,
Jean-Marc

Le 28/10/2015 09:38, Nux! a écrit :

Pasi,

Where are these RPMs, how are they built, what exactly are the
differences vs the stock ones?

Regards,
Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen"<pa...@iki.fi>
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS"
<centos-virt@centos.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 28 October, 2015 08:36:18
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:19:16PM +, Nux! wrote:

To clarify my own request:

RBD (for CEPH) support is available in the version bundled in RHEL
7.2 Beta, so
we'll have it in CentOS 7.2 (or whatever will be the identifying
number).

The hooks seems just like a matter of creating files in the correct
location.

..So, all is good in the world once again.


Except the VirtSIG provides a different version/build of libvirt
rpms, so we
still need to enable RBD/Ceph support separately in VirtSIG provided
version..


-- Pasi


Regards,
Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Nux!"<n...@li.nux.ro>
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS"
<centos-virt@centos.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 27 October, 2015 15:22:27
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests
So... how exactly do we proceed?

Anyone from the Virt SIG, please stand up?

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen"<pa...@iki.fi>
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS"
<centos-virt@centos.org>
Sent: Sunday, 25 October, 2015 11:02:22
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 05:44:20PM +0100, Nux! wrote:

Hi folks,


Hi,


I know you're rebuilding livbirt for the SIG. Would it be
possible to enable RBD
support in it?


Yes, we should definitely enable RBD / Ceph support in libvirt!




I know quite a few cases (in the Cloudstack community) that
switched to Ubuntu
particularly because CEPH support was missing.
The recommendation is to rebuild the rpms, but this is not a
viable thing for
everyone. E.g.
http://blog.widodh.nl/2015/04/rebuilding-libvirt-under-centos-7-1-with-rbd-storage-pool-support/


Another thing that I noticed on the CentOS ml recently is an
alleged lack of
hooks,https://www.libvirt.org/hooks.html

And last but not least, where could I find the libvirt (s)rpms
that the SIG
produces?

Lucian


-- Pasi



___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests

2015-10-31 Thread Jean-Marc LIGER


Hi Lucian,

It seems to be upstream libvirt-1.2.15-2 with options with_xen and 
with_libxl enabled.

http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1348

Regards,
Jean-Marc

Le 28/10/2015 09:38, Nux! a écrit :

Pasi,

Where are these RPMs, how are they built, what exactly are the differences vs 
the stock ones?

Regards,
Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" 
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" 
Sent: Wednesday, 28 October, 2015 08:36:18
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:19:16PM +, Nux! wrote:

To clarify my own request:

RBD (for CEPH) support is available in the version bundled in RHEL 7.2 Beta, so
we'll have it in CentOS 7.2 (or whatever will be the identifying number).

The hooks seems just like a matter of creating files in the correct location.

..So, all is good in the world once again.


Except the VirtSIG provides a different version/build of libvirt rpms, so we
still need to enable RBD/Ceph support separately in VirtSIG provided version..


-- Pasi


Regards,
Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Nux!" 
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" 
Sent: Tuesday, 27 October, 2015 15:22:27
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests
So... how exactly do we proceed?

Anyone from the Virt SIG, please stand up?

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -

From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" 
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" 
Sent: Sunday, 25 October, 2015 11:02:22
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 05:44:20PM +0100, Nux! wrote:

Hi folks,


Hi,


I know you're rebuilding livbirt for the SIG. Would it be possible to enable RBD
support in it?


Yes, we should definitely enable RBD / Ceph support in libvirt!




I know quite a few cases (in the Cloudstack community) that switched to Ubuntu
particularly because CEPH support was missing.
The recommendation is to rebuild the rpms, but this is not a viable thing for
everyone. E.g.
http://blog.widodh.nl/2015/04/rebuilding-libvirt-under-centos-7-1-with-rbd-storage-pool-support/

Another thing that I noticed on the CentOS ml recently is an alleged lack of
hooks, https://www.libvirt.org/hooks.html

And last but not least, where could I find the libvirt (s)rpms that the SIG
produces?

Lucian



-- Pasi

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] qemu-kvm SLIC acpitable workaround of Windows bug

2015-08-18 Thread Jean-Marc LIGER


Le 31/07/2015 17:50, Gena Makhomed a écrit :

On 31.07.2015 10:19, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248758



Have you checked 3.5.4 RC or CentOS Virt SIG[2]
to see if the bug has been fixed in latest qemu-kvm-ev ?

[1] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5-pre/
[2] http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-kvm-common-testing/x86_64/os/


Patch mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff with workaround
not included into qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.6.1.src.rpm

Bug not in qemu, bug in windows - windows reject SLIC table
if oem_id and oem_table_id from SLIC table and from RSDT table
is different, and this windows bug prevent any virt-p2v migration
of OEM windows from hardware node to VM inside CentOS/RHEL server,
even with config

  qemu:commandline
qemu:arg value='-acpitable'/
qemu:arg value='file=/path/to/sys/firmware/acpi/tables/SLIC'/
  /qemu:commandline

because during acpi tables rebuild qemu-kvm from qemu-kvm-ev
create RSDT table with BOCHS oem_id and BXPCRSDT oem_table_id.



Hi

I've just rebuild a qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.centos.6.2.src.rpm with 
your patch applied :

https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/build/109631/

Regards,
Jean-Marc

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] Mitel only supported VMware virtualization platform for some CentOS servers based products

[CentOS-virt] Mitel only supported VMware virtualization platform for some CentOS servers based products

[CentOS-virt] Kimchi and noVNC

Re: [CentOS-virt] Red Hat VirtIO SCSI pass-through controller

Re: [CentOS-virt] Updated libvirt packages (2.2.0-1) in testing

Re: [CentOS-virt] yum update Failing with libvirt-daemon error

Re: [CentOS-virt] yum update Failing with libvirt-daemon error

[CentOS-virt] Last Mesa with VirGL support

Re: [CentOS-virt] [x-post] Upstream possible patches to libvirt to enable building upstream libvirt packages with libxl

Re: [CentOS-virt] [x-post] Upstream possible patches to libvirt to enable building upstream libvirt packages with libxl

Re: [CentOS-virt] Mouse and display issues with Windows 10 guest

Re: [CentOS-virt] kvm-qemu-ev in testing

Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests

Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests

Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests http://libvirt.org/sources/

Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests

Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests

Re: [CentOS-virt] qemu-kvm SLIC acpitable workaround of Windows bug

18 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information