Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing
Mark: Labels look OK, restorecon has nothing to do, and: -rwxr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /bin/ps dr-xr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:proc_t:s0 /proc I'll send the audit log on to Dan. Cheers, John On 2 December 2014 at 16:10, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: Could you send me a copy of your audit.log. You should not be getting hundreds of AVC's a day. ausearch -m avc,user_avc -ts today On 12/02/2014 05:08 AM, John Beranek wrote: I'll jump in here to say we'll try your suggestion, but I guess what's not been mentioned is that we get the setroubleshoot abrt's only a few times a day, but we're getting 1s of setroubleshoot messages in /var/log/messages a day. e.g. Dec 2 10:03:55 server audispd: queue is full - dropping event Dec 2 10:04:00 server audispd: last message repeated 199 times Dec 2 10:04:00 server rsyslogd-2177: imuxsock begins to drop messages from pid 5967 due to rate-limiting Dec 2 10:04:01 server rsyslogd-2177: imuxsock lost 2 messages from pid 5967 due to rate-limiting Dec 2 10:04:01 server audispd: queue is full - dropping event Dec 2 10:04:02 server audispd: last message repeated 134 times Dec 2 10:04:02 server setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from read access on the file /proc/pid/stat. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 2274b1c7-fd69-4fa8-8e67-cd7a9da9eff4 Dec 2 10:04:02 server audispd: queue is full - dropping event Dec 2 10:04:03 server audispd: last message repeated 48 times Dec 2 10:04:03 server setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from getattr access on the directory /proc/pid. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 2d09d555-8834-4c27-976b-6647f8673286 Dec 2 10:04:03 server audispd: queue is full - dropping event Dec 2 10:04:03 server audispd: last message repeated 15 times Dec 2 10:04:03 server rsyslogd-2177: imuxsock begins to drop messages from pid 5967 due to rate-limiting Dec 2 10:04:03 server setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from search access on the directory /proc/pid/stat. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 0ef0c7a1-acb2-433a-aaa2-361cc95b6069 Dec 2 10:04:04 server setroubleshoot: last message repeated 2 times Dec 2 10:04:04 server setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from getattr access on the directory /proc/pid. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 58f859b0-7382-428e-81f0-3e85f66d79fc Dec 2 10:04:04 server setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from search access on the directory /proc/pid/stat. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 2448a46d-5089-4f85-aae8-e9013341471f Dec 2 10:04:05 server setroubleshoot: last message repeated 2 times Dec 2 10:04:05 server setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from getattr access on the directory /proc/pid. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l f935416b-54fe-4bbd-b66c-2e1b2e6724be Dec 2 10:04:06 server setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from search access on the directory /proc/pid/stat. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l d8dbf973-7bc2-4fd5-9540-18c4040be03c Dec 2 10:04:06 server setroubleshoot: last message repeated 2 times Dec 2 10:04:06 server sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot, dropping message Dec 2 10:04:06 server sedispatch: last message repeated 3 times Cheers, John On 1 December 2014 at 17:19, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/01/2014 10:39 AM, Gary Smithson wrote: We are currently running libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.2.x86_64 How far back would you suggest we go? would libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.1.x86_64 be sufficient Ok might not be related. One other suggestion would be to clear the database out. And see if there was something in the database that was causing it problems. Make sure there is no setroubleshootd running and /var/lib/setroubleshoot/setroubleshoot_database.xml -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Daniel J Walsh Sent: 01 December 2014 15:10 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing I am not sure. I was just seeing email on this today. Could you try to downgrade the latest version of libxml to see if the problem goes away. On 12/01/2014 10:01 AM, Gary Smithson wrote: Thanks Could you please clarify, which version libxml is broken and has there been a newer version released that will fix it. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Daniel J Walsh Sent: 01 December 2014 14:58 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing This seems to be a problem with an updated version of libxml. On 11/28/2014 09:04 AM, Gary Smithson wrote: When running Node.js through Phusion Passenger on Centos 6.5 ( Linux 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6
Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing
Indeed, thanks Dan - it doesn't get us to a completely clean running that would allow us to run our Node app as we are under Passenger with SELinux enforcing, but it at least has stopped the excessive amount of AVCs we were getting. John On 3 December 2014 at 10:01, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: Looks like turning on three booleans will solve most of the problem. httpd_execmem, httpd_run_stickshift, allow_httpd_anon_write On 12/03/2014 03:55 AM, John Beranek wrote: Mark: Labels look OK, restorecon has nothing to do, and: -rwxr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /bin/ps dr-xr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:proc_t:s0 /proc I'll send the audit log on to Dan. Cheers, John On 2 December 2014 at 16:10, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: Could you send me a copy of your audit.log. You should not be getting hundreds of AVC's a day. ausearch -m avc,user_avc -ts today On 12/02/2014 05:08 AM, John Beranek wrote: I'll jump in here to say we'll try your suggestion, but I guess what's not been mentioned is that we get the setroubleshoot abrt's only a few times a day, but we're getting 1s of setroubleshoot messages in /var/log/messages a day. e.g. Dec 2 10:03:55 server audispd: queue is full - dropping event Dec 2 10:04:00 server audispd: last message repeated 199 times Dec 2 10:04:00 server rsyslogd-2177: imuxsock begins to drop messages from pid 5967 due to rate-limiting Dec 2 10:04:01 server rsyslogd-2177: imuxsock lost 2 messages from pid 5967 due to rate-limiting Dec 2 10:04:01 server audispd: queue is full - dropping event Dec 2 10:04:02 server audispd: last message repeated 134 times Dec 2 10:04:02 server setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from read access on the file /proc/pid/stat. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 2274b1c7-fd69-4fa8-8e67-cd7a9da9eff4 Dec 2 10:04:02 server audispd: queue is full - dropping event Dec 2 10:04:03 server audispd: last message repeated 48 times Dec 2 10:04:03 server setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from getattr access on the directory /proc/pid. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 2d09d555-8834-4c27-976b-6647f8673286 Dec 2 10:04:03 server audispd: queue is full - dropping event Dec 2 10:04:03 server audispd: last message repeated 15 times Dec 2 10:04:03 server rsyslogd-2177: imuxsock begins to drop messages from pid 5967 due to rate-limiting Dec 2 10:04:03 server setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from search access on the directory /proc/pid/stat. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 0ef0c7a1-acb2-433a-aaa2-361cc95b6069 Dec 2 10:04:04 server setroubleshoot: last message repeated 2 times Dec 2 10:04:04 server setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from getattr access on the directory /proc/pid. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 58f859b0-7382-428e-81f0-3e85f66d79fc Dec 2 10:04:04 server setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from search access on the directory /proc/pid/stat. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 2448a46d-5089-4f85-aae8-e9013341471f Dec 2 10:04:05 server setroubleshoot: last message repeated 2 times Dec 2 10:04:05 server setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from getattr access on the directory /proc/pid. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l f935416b-54fe-4bbd-b66c-2e1b2e6724be Dec 2 10:04:06 server setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from search access on the directory /proc/pid/stat. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l d8dbf973-7bc2-4fd5-9540-18c4040be03c Dec 2 10:04:06 server setroubleshoot: last message repeated 2 times Dec 2 10:04:06 server sedispatch: AVC Message for setroubleshoot, dropping message Dec 2 10:04:06 server sedispatch: last message repeated 3 times Cheers, John On 1 December 2014 at 17:19, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/01/2014 10:39 AM, Gary Smithson wrote: We are currently running libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.2.x86_64 How far back would you suggest we go? would libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.1.x86_64 be sufficient Ok might not be related. One other suggestion would be to clear the database out. And see if there was something in the database that was causing it problems. Make sure there is no setroubleshootd running and /var/lib/setroubleshoot/setroubleshoot_database.xml -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Daniel J Walsh Sent: 01 December 2014 15:10 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing I am not sure. I was just seeing email on this today. Could you try to downgrade the latest version of libxml to see if the problem goes away. On 12/01/2014 10:01 AM, Gary Smithson wrote: Thanks Could you please clarify
Re: [CentOS] SEtroubleshootd Crashing
: /usr/sbin/setroubleshootd kernel: 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 last_occurrence: 1417101625 time: Thu 27 Nov 2014 03:20:25 PM UTC uid:0 username: root sosreport.tar.xz: Binary file, 3642240 bytes backtrace: :analyze.py:426:lookup_signature:ProgramError: [Errno 1001] signature not found : :Traceback (most recent call last): : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 401, in auto_save_callback :self.save() : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 377, in save :self.prune() : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 340, in prune :self.delete_signature(sig, prune=True) : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 471, in delete_signature :siginfo = self.lookup_signature(sig) : File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/setroubleshoot/analyze.py, line 426, in lookup_signature :raise ProgramError(ERR_NO_SIGNATURE_MATCH) :ProgramError: [Errno 1001] signature not found : :Local variables in innermost frame: :matches: [] :siginfo: None :self: setroubleshoot.analyze.SETroubleshootDatabase object at 0x151d590 :sig: setroubleshoot.signature.SEFaultSignature object at 0x645a050 We are running the following versions Passenger/htttpd/node passenger --version Phusion Passenger version 4.0.53 httpd -v Server version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) Server built: Jul 23 2014 14:17:29 node -v v0.10.32 This email is from the Press Association. For more information, see www.pressassociation.com. This email may contain confidential information. Only the addressee is permitted to read, copy, distribute or otherwise use this email or any attachments. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any opinion expressed in this email is personal to the sender and may not reflect the opinion of the Press Association. Any email reply to this address may be subject to interception or monitoring for operational reasons or for lawful business practices. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos This email is from the Press Association. For more information, see www.pressassociation.com. This email may contain confidential information. Only the addressee is permitted to read, copy, distribute or otherwise use this email or any attachments. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any opinion expressed in this email is personal to the sender and may not reflect the opinion of the Press Association. Any email reply to this address may be subject to interception or monitoring for operational reasons or for lawful business practices. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos This email is from the Press Association. For more information, see www.pressassociation.com. This email may contain confidential information. Only the addressee is permitted to read, copy, distribute or otherwise use this email or any attachments. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any opinion expressed in this email is personal to the sender and may not reflect the opinion of the Press Association. Any email reply to this address may be subject to interception or monitoring for operational reasons or for lawful business practices. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] netcat or netcat6 for Centos 6.3
On 06/03/2013 20:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote: In my testing of HIP, there is reference to use 'nc6' for a simple TCP character echo server. No such animal in Centos, and after a bit of digging I find this refers to Netcat6 which seems to be a dead app? Is it available as an rpm somewhere for Centos? My searching is coming up empty. Or just about any service that I can start on one system and connect from another that would perform this simple echo test. nc on CentOS 6 has -4 and -6 options for this. Cheers, John. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] nc not working as advertised
On 07/03/2013 22:06, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 7 Mar 2013, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I can't get nc to do anything worthwhile. In fact I can't even get the examples in the manpage to work. From either my C6 servers or my F17 notebooks. For example: echo -n GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n\r\n | nc medon.htt-consult.com 80 You mean echo -ne GET ... Certainly works for me with the right echo options, and one of those old-style basic HTTP requests. John. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos
On 02/11/2011 10:31, Patrick Lists wrote: On 11/02/2011 11:02 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: What is a socket in their pricing model? The word can mean so many different things... Afaik it refers to a physical cpu socket. So they count actual cpu's, not the amount of cores in each cpu. I was just asking myself this very question the other day, and I couldn't determine how many sockets you are using if you use, say, 2 _virtual_ processors. John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos
On 07/11/2011 16:45, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 07.11.2011 17:42, schrieb John Beranek: On 02/11/2011 10:31, Patrick Lists wrote: On 11/02/2011 11:02 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: What is a socket in their pricing model? The word can mean so many different things... Afaik it refers to a physical cpu socket. So they count actual cpu's, not the amount of cores in each cpu. I was just asking myself this very question the other day, and I couldn't determine how many sockets you are using if you use, say, 2 _virtual_ processors. in newer VMware versions (Workstation 7/8) you can assign virtual CPUs and cores per virtual CPU, i guess VMware ESXi 5 will have this feature too, but not my nested vm is currently not running and production will stay on ESXi 4.1 for some time Still doesn't answer how many sockets you're using if you have a RHEL 5/6 guest VM with 2 (or 4) virtual VMware processors... John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos
On 07/11/2011 18:57, John R Pierce wrote: On 11/07/11 9:36 AM, John Beranek wrote: Still doesn't answer how many sockets you're using if you have a RHEL 5/6 guest VM with 2 (or 4) virtual VMware processors... can you even run another VM hypervisor under vmware?!? I don't understand why people think I want to install another hypervisor in our VMware cluster. I want to _run a RHEL box in a VMware cluster_. I can't understand the licensing model of RHEL because a VM doesn't have a socket. John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos
On 07/11/2011 22:23, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 07.11.2011 22:50, schrieb Marko Vojinovic: Typically, you have no way of knowing the physical structure of the cloud machine where your virtual machine is being hosted. Also, this structure may even change over time due to upgrades of the cloud hardware (by the cloud provider). You wouldn't even know about it. again: the physical structure does not matter you pay for virtaul CPUs as you do also for virtual appliances of some vendors where you can get a license with 2 vCPUs or 4 vCPUs - independent if you have your own hardware or using any hsoting service what is there so difficulty to understand? The difficulty in understanding is that RHEL licensing is quoted solely on *SOCKETS*. My VMs don't have sockets! What is difficult to understand there!? John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] No MySQL password in ps aux!
On 12/09/2011 03:37, Devin Reade wrote: Getting back to the original question, it is a feature of mysql (not of CentOS per se), but there's nothing that stops other (C) programs from doing something similar. Shortly after startup, a programmer can set things up so that command line arguments (or in this case one of them) is hidden from anyone from viewing the process table. You can even do this in something like Perl, here you just modify '$0'. John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: Making KDE Default
On 07/09/2011 22:35, Jeremy Sanders wrote: Michael D. Berger wrote: I learned from Anne that if I boot to level 5, after I enter the username, can select Gnome or KDE. I note that the default is always Gnome. How can I make the default KDE? How can I get KDE with startx after booting to level 3? Assuming it is the same as fedora, put the lines DESKTOP=KDE DISPLAYMANAGER=KDE in /etc/sysconfig/desktop to change it for all users. You beat me to the punch: [root@test-centos6-vm ~]# head -25 /etc/X11/prefdm #!/bin/sh PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin # We need to source this so that the login screens get translated [ -f /etc/sysconfig/i18n ] . /etc/sysconfig/i18n # Run preferred X display manager quit_arg= preferred= if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/desktop ]; then . /etc/sysconfig/desktop if [ $DISPLAYMANAGER = GNOME ]; then preferred=/usr/sbin/gdm quit_arg=--retain-splash elif [ $DISPLAYMANAGER = KDE ]; then preferred=/usr/bin/kdm elif [ $DISPLAYMANAGER = WDM ]; then preferred=/usr/bin/wdm elif [ $DISPLAYMANAGER = XDM ]; then preferred=/usr/bin/xdm elif [ -n $DISPLAYMANAGER ]; then preferred=$DISPLAYMANAGER else quit_arg=--retain-splash John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0 and freenx
On 02/08/11 12:26, Helmut Drodofsky wrote: Hi, http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX says: NX and FreeNX are only available for Centos 4 and 5 http://pkgs.org/centos-6-rhel-6/atrpms-x86_64/freenx-server-0.7.3-18.el6.x86_64.rpm.html John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Convert Filesystem to Ext4
On 19/04/2011 23:51, Kenni Lund wrote: Den 19/04/2011 19.42 skrev Matt lm7...@gmail.com mailto:lm7...@gmail.com: On a running 64 bit CentOS 5.6 box is it possible to convert from Ext3 to Ext4 to improve performance? This is entirely from memory, so it might be incorrect and not relevant anymore: When ext4 got released, it was possible to upgrade ext3 to ext4, but while you would gain some ext4 features and minor performance improvements, the only way to get native ext4 performance, was to delete and recreate the partition. That's not quite true, you can force files on a partition to be re-created using extents with something like the below: find /home -xdev -type f -print0 | xargs -0 chattr +e find /home -xdev -type d -print0 | xargs -0 chattr +e Cheers, John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] php53 and MSSQL
[Reposted now I've joined the list, so I hopefully don't get moderated out] Hi, I've upgraded lots of machines to 5.6 (thanks!) and there was one particular machine that I'd also like to upgrade to PHP 5.3. Unfortunately it seems I can't. On the machine I have php-mssql installed, and it appears that there is no php53-mssql. php-mssql is built from the php-extras SRPM, so is there going to be a php53-extras SRPM? I've checked upstream, and they also don't have a php53-mssql package, so if there _were_ to be solved it'd have to be in the 'Extras' repository I guess... Cheers, John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] php53 and MSSQL
On 15/04/11 12:23, John Beranek wrote: [Reposted now I've joined the list, so I hopefully don't get moderated out] Hi, I've upgraded lots of machines to 5.6 (thanks!) and there was one particular machine that I'd also like to upgrade to PHP 5.3. Unfortunately it seems I can't. On the machine I have php-mssql installed, and it appears that there is no php53-mssql. I was going to see if I could rebuild the php53 SRPM support with MSSQL support, until I found that the SRPMs still aren't available on the CentOS mirrors yet. Downloading the upstream RPM now, will see how that goes... John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] php53 and MSSQL
On 15/04/11 13:49, Phil Schaffner wrote: John Beranek wrote on 04/15/2011 07:45 AM: On 15/04/11 12:23, John Beranek wrote: [Reposted now I've joined the list, so I hopefully don't get moderated out] Hi, I've upgraded lots of machines to 5.6 (thanks!) and there was one particular machine that I'd also like to upgrade to PHP 5.3. Unfortunately it seems I can't. On the machine I have php-mssql installed, and it appears that there is no php53-mssql. I was going to see if I could rebuild the php53 SRPM support with MSSQL support, until I found that the SRPMs still aren't available on the CentOS mirrors yet. Downloading the upstream RPM now, will see how that goes... I sound like a shill for IUS this morning - not the case I assure you - but they have php53u-mssql-5.3.6-1.ius.el5 Well, I've now rebuilt the RHEL SRPM with mssql support. It's now built in the openSUSE Build Service at: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=php53project=home%3Ajohnberanek%3Aphp53_centos Not ideal in that it's the while php53 SRPM, and additionally because OBS is currently building with CentOS 5.5 instead of 5.6. The latter issue has brought me to raise a bug in the OBS Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687848 Update CentOS build to 5.6 Installed my built PHP 5.3 RPMs on the machine I wanted them on - painful! Why do you need to remove the PHP 5.1 RPMs before you can install the 'php53' ones, surely the php53 RPMs could have had Deprecated lines!? John. -- John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot. http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
