[CentOS-virt] centos-virt CPU microcode updates?

2019-05-16 Thread Karel Hendrych

Hi,

is there any guide for CPU microcode updates on CentOS6, Xen 4.10, 
kernel 4.9 ?


Thanks
Karel
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] libvirtd hang on CentOS6 after latest updates

2018-05-25 Thread Karel Hendrych

Bump. Folks, any ideas?

Cheers
Karel

On 22.5.2018 11:33, Karel Hendrych wrote:
Hi, I am seeing frequent libvirtd hangs (clients not responding) after 
last CentOS6-Xen update :


libvirt-libs-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-network-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-nwfilter-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libgcc-4.4.7-18.el6_9.2.x86_64
2:qemu-img-0.12.1.2-2.503.el6_9.5.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-core-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-secret-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-interface-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-nodedev-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
10:centos-release-xen-common-8-4.el6.x86_64
xen-licenses-4.6.6-12.el6.x86_64
xen-libs-4.6.6-12.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-libxl-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-xen-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-gluster-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-logical-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-mpath-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-disk-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-scsi-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-iscsi-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libstdc++-4.4.7-18.el6_9.2.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-config-network-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-lxc-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-client-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
linux-firmware-20171215-82.git2451bb22.el6.noarch
12:dhcp-common-4.1.1-53.P1.el6.centos.4.x86_64
12:dhclient-4.1.1-53.P1.el6.centos.4.x86_64
libvirt-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
10:centos-release-xen-46-8-4.el6.x86_64
10:centos-release-xen-44-8-4.el6.x86_64
tzdata-2018e-3.el6.noarch
libgomp-4.4.7-18.el6_9.2.x86_64
kernel-4.9.86-30.el6.x86_64
xen-hypervisor-4.6.6-12.el6.x86_64
xen-runtime-4.6.6-12.el6.x86_64
xen-4.6.6-12.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-xen-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64

Remedy is to kill -9 libvirtd and start again. Issue can be replicated 
within few domU starts. Usually libvirtd hangs when domU is bringing up 
xen drivers or something around udev, like:


xen_netfront: Initialising Xen virtual ethernet driver

I've been looking into libvirtd strace and debug logs, so far most 
suspicious in libvirtd debug log is this:


libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.760+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/tx-7'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.761+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/tx-6'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.761+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/tx-4'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.762+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/tx-5'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.763+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/tx-2'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.764+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/tx-3'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.765+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/rx-6'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.766+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/rx-5'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.767+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/rx-4'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.767+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/rx-7'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.768+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/rx-2'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.769+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/rx-3'


I could not get rid of this by reducing amount of driver queues (not 
sure if that applies to PV)


Is someone out there seeing similar issues? Anyone perhaps interested in 
reviewing full debug log / strace ?


Cheers
Karel

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https

[CentOS-virt] libvirtd hang on CentOS6 after latest updates

2018-05-22 Thread Karel Hendrych
Hi, I am seeing frequent libvirtd hangs (clients not responding) after 
last CentOS6-Xen update :


libvirt-libs-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-network-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-nwfilter-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libgcc-4.4.7-18.el6_9.2.x86_64
2:qemu-img-0.12.1.2-2.503.el6_9.5.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-core-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-secret-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-interface-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-nodedev-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
10:centos-release-xen-common-8-4.el6.x86_64
xen-licenses-4.6.6-12.el6.x86_64
xen-libs-4.6.6-12.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-libxl-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-xen-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-gluster-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-logical-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-mpath-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-disk-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-scsi-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-iscsi-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libstdc++-4.4.7-18.el6_9.2.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-config-network-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-driver-lxc-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
libvirt-client-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
linux-firmware-20171215-82.git2451bb22.el6.noarch
12:dhcp-common-4.1.1-53.P1.el6.centos.4.x86_64
12:dhclient-4.1.1-53.P1.el6.centos.4.x86_64
libvirt-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64
10:centos-release-xen-46-8-4.el6.x86_64
10:centos-release-xen-44-8-4.el6.x86_64
tzdata-2018e-3.el6.noarch
libgomp-4.4.7-18.el6_9.2.x86_64
kernel-4.9.86-30.el6.x86_64
xen-hypervisor-4.6.6-12.el6.x86_64
xen-runtime-4.6.6-12.el6.x86_64
xen-4.6.6-12.el6.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-xen-4.1.0-2.xen46.el6.x86_64

Remedy is to kill -9 libvirtd and start again. Issue can be replicated 
within few domU starts. Usually libvirtd hangs when domU is bringing up 
xen drivers or something around udev, like:


xen_netfront: Initialising Xen virtual ethernet driver

I've been looking into libvirtd strace and debug logs, so far most 
suspicious in libvirtd debug log is this:


libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.760+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/tx-7'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.761+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/tx-6'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.761+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/tx-4'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.762+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/tx-5'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.763+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/tx-2'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.764+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/tx-3'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.765+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/rx-6'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.766+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/rx-5'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.767+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/rx-4'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.767+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/rx-7'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.768+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/rx-2'
libvirtd.log:2018-05-22 08:32:44.769+: 25455: debug : 
udevRemoveOneDevice:1289 : Failed to find device to remove that has udev 
name '/sys/devices/vif-24-0/net/vif24.0/queues/rx-3'


I could not get rid of this by reducing amount of driver queues (not 
sure if that applies to PV)


Is someone out there seeing similar issues? Anyone perhaps interested in 
reviewing full debug log / strace ?


Cheers
Karel

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] NIC Stability Problems Under Xen 4.4 / CentOS 6 / Linux 3.18

2017-01-27 Thread Karel Hendrych

Have you tried to eliminate all power management features all over?

Are the devices connected to the same network infrastructure?

There has to be something common.

I've been using Intel NICs with Xen/CentOS for ages with no issues.

Karel

On 27.1.2017 02:57, Kevin Stange wrote:

On 01/26/2017 02:08 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:

On 01/26/2017 09:35 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:

On 01/26/2017 09:32 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:

On 01/25/2017 11:49 AM, Kevin Stange wrote:

On 01/24/2017 11:16 AM, Kevin Stange wrote:

On 01/24/2017 09:10 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:29:39PM +0800, -=X.L.O.R.D=- wrote:

Kevin Stange,
It can be either kernel or update the NIC driver or firmware of the NIC
card. Hope that helps!

Xlord
-Original Message-
From: CentOS-virt [mailto:centos-virt-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Kevin
Stange
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 1:04 AM
To: centos-virt@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-virt] NIC Stability Problems Under Xen 4.4 / CentOS 6 /
Linux 3.18





Has anyone experienced similar issues with this configuration, and if so,
does anyone have tips on how to resolve the issues?


Honeslty I would email Intel and see if they can help. This looks like
the NIC decides something is wrong, throws off an PCIe error and
then resets itself.


This happens for several different NICs.  Is there a good contact at
Intel for this kind of thing, or should I just try to reach them through
their web site?


It could also be an error in the Linux stack which would "eat" an
interrupt when migrating interrupts (which was fixed
upstream, see below). Are you running irqbalance? Could you try
turning it off?


irqbalance is enabled on these servers.  I'll try disabling it.


I had stopped irqbalance yesterday afternoon, but had a hypervisor's
NICs fail anyway in early morning this morning, so I'm pretty sure this
is not the right tree to bark up.



Here is a set of drivers/fireware from Intel for those NICs:

https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/15817/Intel-Network-Adapter-Driver-for-PCI-E-Gigabit-Network-Connections-under-Linux-

I will see if I can get a CentOS-6 build of the latest version of that
from our older SRPM:

http://vault.centos.org/6.7/xen4/Source/SPackages/e1000e-2.5.4-3.10.68.2.el6.centos.alt.src.rpm

I am currently very busy with several c5, c6, c7 updates and the i686
altarch c7 tree .. but I have this on my list.  In the meantime, maybe
someone else could also see if those drivers help you (or you could try
to compile / install it).

Do you have another machine that you can use to see if you can duplicate
the issue NOT running the xen.gz hypervisor boot, but just the straight
kernel?


I can't actually reproduce this problem reliably.  It happens randomly
when the servers are up and running anywhere between a few hours and a
month or more, and I haven't been able to isolate any specific way to
cause it to happen.  As a result I can't really test different solutions
on different servers to see what helps.  I was hoping other people were
seeing it so that I could get some direction.  If I can reproduce it, it
won't take me very long to identify what the cause is.  Right now if I
do upgrade the drivers on the systems I won't really know if it's fixed
until I don't see another issue for several months.


Actually .. I think this is the driver for you:

https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/13663

And this explains how to make it work:

http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/network-and-i-o/ethernet-products/05767.html


The different combinations of NICs overlap both the e1000e and igb
drivers, but the most egregious issues have been with the igb ones.
I'll try to give this a shot and report back if I still see issues with
a server after doing so, but it might be a week or two before I find out.


So the NICs giving issues in most cases were igb drivers.  I've tried
replacing the drivers on some HVs with the version you suggested, but it
doesn't seem to have helped with stability.  Any other ideas?


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] Updated centos-release-xen packages (fixes missing initrd issue on upgrade)

2016-02-13 Thread Karel Hendrych
Thanks! Upgrade to 3.18.25-18.el6/4.4.3-10.el6 went fine. No need to 
manualy adjust grub anymore.

BR
--
Karel

On 20.1.2016 19:33, George Dunlap wrote:

I've pushed an update to the centos-release-xen package,
centos-release-xen-7-12.el6, to centos-virt-xen-testing, which should
fix the "missing initrd" issue people have been seeing.

Please test and see if it fixes your issue (and that it makes no other
issues).  If everything works well, I'll get it pushed to
centos-extras.

Thanks,
  -George


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


[CentOS-virt] 3.18.21-16 upgrade, kernel panic, unable to mount root fs

2015-11-01 Thread Karel Hendrych
Hi, just a heads-up: 3.18.21 didn't boot up on HP ML310e Gen8 v2, SATA 
drives in AHCI mode, / on software raid 1, no LVM. It ended up in kernel 
panic with unable to mount root fs. Attached. No difference in grub 
kernel/xen settings.


I didn't investigate the things deeper so far. 4.4.3-3/3.18.17 is 
booting fine.


Any similar experience?

BR
--
Karel
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] 3.18.21-16 upgrade, kernel panic, unable to mount root fs

2015-11-01 Thread Karel Hendrych
Indeed, a good catch. Module initramfs line was missing at 3.18.21 grub 
config.


Thanks!
--
Karel

On 1.11.2015 21:46, Sarah Newman wrote:

On 11/01/2015 12:07 PM, Karel Hendrych wrote:

Hi, just a heads-up: 3.18.21 didn't boot up on HP ML310e Gen8 v2, SATA drives 
in AHCI mode, / on software raid 1, no LVM. It ended up in kernel panic
with unable to mount root fs. Attached. No difference in grub kernel/xen 
settings.

I didn't investigate the things deeper so far. 4.4.3-3/3.18.17 is booting fine.

Any similar experience?


Check the module line for the initramfs is present in grub.conf. It's gone 
missing in all our recent upgrades, but I wasn't sure if it was an upstream
problem or our own.

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] libvirt, xen PV, qemu-system-i386, root user

2015-09-14 Thread Karel Hendrych

Good test, non-buffered dom0 dd write speed is similar with tap2.

I'll likely stay with the QEMU backend. Are there any best practises 
regarding security, at least if QEMU can operate under non-root account?


Cheers
--
Karel

On 12.9.2015 10:51, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 01:35:48AM +0200, Karel Hendrych wrote:

Comparing simple dd bs=1M count=1 on dom0 vs domU. Qemu driver
is achieving pretty much the same like dom0.



So you're measuring buffered speed. Try measuring non-buffered (iflag=direct or 
oflag=direct, depending if you're reading or writing).

-- Pasi


Thanks
--
Karel

On 7.9.2015 21:45, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:

On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 05:47:39PM +0200, Karel Hendrych wrote:

...

changing from:  to:  makes
the domain start without QEMU.

However I see much better performance with QEMU (close to dom0,
tested using simple dd writes) than with tap2 driver. Is that
expected?



How did you measure it? buffered or direct io?


-- Pasi



What's best practise to file based storage on latest CentOS6-xen
(Kernel 3.18.17, Xen 4.4.2-7)

Are there any guides around running QEMU on CentOS6-xen as non-root user?

Cheers
--
Karel

On 7.9.2015 17:42, Karel Hendrych wrote:

Hi, spot on!


On 6.9.2015 12:56, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:

On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 09:08:50AM +0200, Karel Hendrych wrote:

Hi, after migrating to libvirt/libxl according to:



Hi,


https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Xen/Xen4QuickStart/Xen4Libvirt

I've noticed that my Xen PV domains are being launched by
qemu-system-i386 running under root privileges.

I am wondering why is this? Previously no qemu process was used.

If qemu is needed for some reason, are there any guidelines for
non-root operation?



In general qemu is used for the following purposes:

- for certain domU disk backend types (image files), and/or if there's
no blktap driver in dom0 kernel.
- domU graphical console (PVFB) VNC server, if it's enabled for the domU.



--
Karel Hendrych



-- Pasi

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] libvirt, xen PV, qemu-system-i386, root user

2015-09-07 Thread Karel Hendrych

Hi, spot on!


On 6.9.2015 12:56, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:

On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 09:08:50AM +0200, Karel Hendrych wrote:

Hi, after migrating to libvirt/libxl according to:



Hi,


https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Xen/Xen4QuickStart/Xen4Libvirt

I've noticed that my Xen PV domains are being launched by
qemu-system-i386 running under root privileges.

I am wondering why is this? Previously no qemu process was used.

If qemu is needed for some reason, are there any guidelines for
non-root operation?



In general qemu is used for the following purposes:

- for certain domU disk backend types (image files), and/or if there's no 
blktap driver in dom0 kernel.
- domU graphical console (PVFB) VNC server, if it's enabled for the domU.



--
Karel Hendrych



-- Pasi

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


[CentOS-virt] libvirt, xen PV, qemu-system-i386, root user

2015-09-06 Thread Karel Hendrych

Hi, after migrating to libvirt/libxl according to:

https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Xen/Xen4QuickStart/Xen4Libvirt

I've noticed that my Xen PV domains are being launched by 
qemu-system-i386 running under root privileges.


I am wondering why is this? Previously no qemu process was used.

If qemu is needed for some reason, are there any guidelines for non-root 
operation?


Thanks
--
Karel Hendrych
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt