Re: [CentOS] ugly login screen - squirrel
Prabhpal S. Mavi, Can you provide a URL to use to view what it actually looks like? Is it on an external server? I installed squirrelmail from the tar.bz2 file available from their web site at the link. http://squirrelmail.org/download.php Here is a link to the page where it can be viewed from. http://linux1.iwcc.edu/webmail/src/login.php Michael Peterson Prabhpal S. Mavi wrote: Dear Friends Greetings, i am CentOS User for some years now, have installed and configured squirrelmail number of times without issues. but this time it is on CentOS 6.2 x64 - i see very ugly login interface. of squirrelmail, i wish to mention that the package was installed from epelrepo becuse it is not available on centos or rpmforge repo either. i can login also, after login this is how i see the inside interface. id anyone has come across the same? any solution? here is what i see on squirrelmail login page: bgcolor=#ff border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 width=100% SquirrelMail Logo SquirrelMail version 1.4.22-2.el6 By the SquirrelMail Project Team bgcolor=#ff border=0 width=350 bgcolor=#dcdcdcSquirrelMail Login bgcolor=#ff bgcolor=#ff border=0 width=100% width=30%Name: width=70% width=30%Password: width=70% Please note that this is a traditional mailing list, and the HTML was chopped off - we only do plain text. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS and Bandwidth
I am looking forward to using CentOS 6 soon. I have the torrent running to download and help others download it. I am trying out Scientific Linux 6 while awaiting the arrival of CentOS 6. It took a lot of work to get it installed and configured on a system. I plan to run them both on 2 systems and see what happens. I look forward to the release of CentOS 6.1 soon also. Let me know where I can browse to see if I can help in any areas other than the torrent. If I have a T1 size pipe going out what is my max possible kB out? I have the torrent turned up to 100kB and my VPN still seems responsive. Thanks for all the hard working in getting this release ready. Good job on getting CentOS 5.6 out first however. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Update from 5.2 to 5.3 kernel not on mirror
I have tried today and at least twice last week since the release of 5.3 on Tuesday and got past the yum update glibc step just fine and have already done yum clean all several times and get through the first part of the yum update where you have to answer y and then it downloads all of the packages it seems but errors out and says that the kernel is not available on any mirrors. The system is running 32 Bit CentOS 5.2. It is a Pentium D system. Has anyone else had this issue? Is there a fix in progress for it? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update from 5.2 to 5.3 kernel not on mirror
John R Pierce wrote: Michael Peterson wrote: I have tried today and at least twice last week since the release of 5.3 on Tuesday and got past the yum update glibc step just fine and have already done yum clean all several times and get through the first part of the yum update where you have to answer y and then it downloads all of the packages it seems but errors out and says that the kernel is not available on any mirrors. The system is running 32 Bit CentOS 5.2. It is a Pentium D system. Has anyone else had this issue? Is there a fix in progress for it? could you give the exact error message, also what kernel you're running now, and any changes you may have made to /etc/yum.repos.d/* ? # uname -a Linux freescruz.com 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5 #1 SMP Wed Nov 12 09:30:27 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux (note, we're intentionally running the prior kernel until my associate can get around to rebuilding some audio kernel modules he requires) # yum list kernel\* Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * epel: mirror.hmc.edu * rpmforge: fr2.rpmfind.net * base: centos.cogentcloud.com * updates: mirror.stanford.edu * addons: mirror.hmc.edu * extras: www.cyberuse.com Excluding Packages from Red Hat Enterprise 5 - RPMforge.net - dag Finished Excluding Packages from CentOS-5 - Base Finished Excluding Packages from CentOS-5 - Updates Finished 1450 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Installed Packages kernel.i686 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5 installed kernel.i686 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 installed kernel.i686 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 installed kernel-devel.i686 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5 installed kernel-devel.i686 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 installed kernel-devel.i686 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 installed kernel-headers.i386 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 installed Available Packages kernel-PAE.i686 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates kernel-PAE-devel.i686 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates kernel-debug.i686 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates kernel-debug-devel.i686 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates kernel-doc.noarch 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates kernel-xen.i686 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates kernel-xen-devel.i686 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates kerneloops.i386 0.11-1.el5.rf rpmforge ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos John I am also getting the error message on a Celeron 500 that has 5.2 that I am trying to update. From the Celeron I have: The error message is: Error Downloading Packages: kernel - 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686: failure: RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128-1.6.el5.i686.rpm from updates: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. # uname --all Linux router 2.6.18-92.el5 #1 SMP Tue Jun 10 18:49:47 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux # yum list kernel\* Installed Packages kernel.i686 2.6.18-92.el5 installed kernel-devel.i6862.6.18-92.el5 installed kernel-headers.i386 2.6.18-92.el5 installed Available Packages kernel.i686 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates kernel-PAE.i686 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates kernel-PAE-devel.i6862.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates kernel-debug.i6862.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates kernel-debug-devel.i686 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates kernel-devel.i6862.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates kernel-doc.noarch2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates kernel-headers.i386 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates kernel-xen.i686 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 updates kernel-xen-devel.i686
Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system
Dhaval Thakar wrote: Hi, I need to implement trouble tracking system, we have 250 users in one premise 3 desktop support technicians. I need to implement trouble ticket system, where user will enter their application / other issues. Mail will be sent to technician available on duty. trouble ticket will be provided to user will be given close stat once resolved. Kindly suggest me one such application based on open source. The one I have been looking at and tested some is: http://www.eticketsupport.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cannot get CentOS to install
JohnS wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 14:15 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote: JohnS wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:21 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote: I would really like to get CentOS 5.2 or 5.3 installed on the system if there is a work around. --- What are you using to burn the CDs? How old is the CD Drive that your are using to install? How old is the cable? Last thing strip it down to the bare minimum harwdare and install? JohnStanley I burned the CD images on Windows using Roxio and an AOpen DVD Read/ CDRW drive. The burned CD's test fine in more than one system. I do have to test them with ide=nodma to get them to pass. The CD Drive and IDE Cable on the system I am trying to install is 5 years old. I searched the CentOS site and mailing list for similar issues and found one dating back to last year. The anaconda errors were similar. I finally got 5.2 to install and the fix was to tell the kernel to ignore the ide tape device. The tape drive is on hdd and the following allowed me to do a GUI install with 512 MB. linux ide=nodma hdd=none Just currious does the tape drive work since install? Would like like to know the brand of it also for reference. I thought I would post my result so that this request for help could be closed. Thanks for having this list to provide the avenue to a solution. JohnStanley ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I have used mt and cpio to access the tape drive with and they work fine. The tape drive is an ECRIX VXA-1a ATAPI TAPE drive. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cannot get CentOS to install
JohnS wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:21 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote: I would really like to get CentOS 5.2 or 5.3 installed on the system if there is a work around. --- What are you using to burn the CDs? How old is the CD Drive that your are using to install? How old is the cable? Last thing strip it down to the bare minimum harwdare and install? JohnStanley ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I burned the CD images on Windows using Roxio and an AOpen DVD Read/ CDRW drive. The burned CD's test fine in more than one system. I do have to test them with ide=nodma to get them to pass. The CD Drive and IDE Cable on the system I am trying to install is 5 years old. I searched the CentOS site and mailing list for similar issues and found one dating back to last year. The anaconda errors were similar. I finally got 5.2 to install and the fix was to tell the kernel to ignore the ide tape device. The tape drive is on hdd and the following allowed me to do a GUI install with 512 MB. linux ide=nodma hdd=none I thought I would post my result so that this request for help could be closed. Thanks for having this list to provide the avenue to a solution. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cannot get CentOS to install
Michael Peterson wrote: Scott Silva wrote: on 3-11-2009 1:44 PM Michael Peterson spake the following: William L. Maltby wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 16:37 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote: I used google but did not come up with anything current to solve my problem. I have not tried any other search engines yet. There is not a search for the CentOS list so I am creating a new post. See below - it's really hard to find. I have tested the CentOS 5.2 and RHEL 5.3 CD's and they passed. I had to use linux mediacheck ide=nodma to get them to pass. The newest releases seem to most times fail with just linux mediacheck. Try making the media after padding the iso image with about 300k of zeros. When you search the archives (there is a search - I'll mention below) there are a couple of threads about this. I have tried linux ide=nodma and linux text ide=nodma after trying linux and linux text Anaconda fails on both CentOS 5.2 and RHEL 5.3 in all cases. With only 512MB or ram you will have to use text mode only, IIRC. Also in the archives. There's also some threads that mention noacpi, acpi=no and some other stuff I can't recall. The system I am trying to install on is running CentOS 3.x. The hardware is P4 2.8 CPU, 512 MB RAM, 120GB 3ware IDE/PATA RAID HD, ATI Video, CDRW CD, Dual Nic, Floppy and IDE/PATA Tape drive. Please provide any options to the kernel that I should try besides the ones mentioned above that fail. snip For your google searches, go to the advanced section and specify centos.org. That gets what's in the archives. To search directly from CentOS site, click Search on http://centos.org/ HTH, The system I am trying to install on boot with out problems or errors on the 5.2 Live CD. Gui works Firefox and Network work I tried the options mentioned and more and get the same errors. They are: Starting graphical installation ... Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/anaconda, line 900, in ? iutil.makeDriveDeviceNodes() File /usr/lib/anaconda/iutil.py. line 264, in makeDriveDeviceNodes isys.makeDevinode(device, dev /%s % (device,)) File /usr/lib/anaconda.isys.py, line 422, inmakeDevInode _isys.mkdevinode(name,fn) SystemError: (2, 'No such file or directory') install exited abnormally [1/1] sending termination signals ... done The RHEL 5.3 boot disk is the same as above except the line 900 is 924. I have tried text and GUI and ide=nodma pci=noacpi with both. Can you see and write to the hard disks with the Live CD? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos The Live CD can see and access the 3ware RAID connected drives. It is using the swap partition. I was able to switch to root and remount a file system read-write and copy files from one mount point to another. I then deleted the files with no problem. I will try to boot CentOS 5.1 CD 1 on Monday and see what results I get. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos CentOS 5.1 NetInstall CD or CD1 both error out with the same results as 5.2 in anaconda. CentOS 4.4 CD 1 which uses the older style install method boots and looks like it could install on the system. I would really like to get CentOS 5.2 or 5.3 installed on the system if there is a work around. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cannot get CentOS to install
Lanny Marcus wrote: On 3/10/09, William L. Maltby centos4b...@triad.rr.com wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 16:37 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote: I used google but did not come up with anything current to solve my problem. I have not tried any other search engines yet. There is not a search for the CentOS list so I am creating a new post. Using Google to search you can begin with: site:centos.org and then your search terms snip With only 512MB or ram you will have to use text mode only, IIRC. Also in the archives. There's also some threads that mention noacpi, acpi=no and some other stuff I can't recall. I have installed CentOS 5.2 (32 bit) using the graphical install on a box with 384 MB of RAM. Slow, but it worked. My daughters box is a P4 1.6 GHz with 384 MB of RAM. It will install with 512 MB of RAM, more happily. Wife's box and mine have 512 MB of RAM. The hardware is P4 2.8 CPU, 512 MB RAM, 120GB 3ware IDE/PATA RAID HD, ATI Video, CDRW CD, Dual Nic, Floppy and IDE/PATA Tape drive. Have you tried the CentOS LiveCD on that HW, to see if everything will work properly? I haven't had to use any special parameters, to get the graphical installs to work on our old Desktop boxes. If it won't go with the LiveCD, try another version ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos The system works properly with the LiveCD. GUI and network come up fine. No kernel options needed. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cannot get CentOS to install
John R Pierce wrote: Michael Peterson wrote: The hardware is P4 2.8 CPU, 512 MB RAM, 120GB 3ware IDE/PATA RAID HD, ATI Video, CDRW CD, Dual Nic, Floppy and IDE/PATA Tape drive. probably more important than any of the data you've given there is, what chipset on the mainboard, which 3ware card, and what dual NIC chips ? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos The Live CD of 5.2 works with out kernel parameters and gives no errors but the install CD will not boot GUI or Text. The Chipset is Intel. The 3ware card is Escalade 7000-2 The NIC chips are both internal Intel 82557 Pro 100 as per the Live CD hwconf file. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cannot get CentOS to install
William L. Maltby wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 16:37 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote: I used google but did not come up with anything current to solve my problem. I have not tried any other search engines yet. There is not a search for the CentOS list so I am creating a new post. See below - it's really hard to find. I have tested the CentOS 5.2 and RHEL 5.3 CD's and they passed. I had to use linux mediacheck ide=nodma to get them to pass. The newest releases seem to most times fail with just linux mediacheck. Try making the media after padding the iso image with about 300k of zeros. When you search the archives (there is a search - I'll mention below) there are a couple of threads about this. I have tried linux ide=nodma and linux text ide=nodma after trying linux and linux text Anaconda fails on both CentOS 5.2 and RHEL 5.3 in all cases. With only 512MB or ram you will have to use text mode only, IIRC. Also in the archives. There's also some threads that mention noacpi, acpi=no and some other stuff I can't recall. The system I am trying to install on is running CentOS 3.x. The hardware is P4 2.8 CPU, 512 MB RAM, 120GB 3ware IDE/PATA RAID HD, ATI Video, CDRW CD, Dual Nic, Floppy and IDE/PATA Tape drive. Please provide any options to the kernel that I should try besides the ones mentioned above that fail. snip For your google searches, go to the advanced section and specify centos.org. That gets what's in the archives. To search directly from CentOS site, click Search on http://centos.org/ HTH, The system I am trying to install on boot with out problems or errors on the 5.2 Live CD. Gui works Firefox and Network work I tried the options mentioned and more and get the same errors. They are: Starting graphical installation ... Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/anaconda, line 900, in ? iutil.makeDriveDeviceNodes() File /usr/lib/anaconda/iutil.py. line 264, in makeDriveDeviceNodes isys.makeDevinode(device, dev /%s % (device,)) File /usr/lib/anaconda.isys.py, line 422, inmakeDevInode _isys.mkdevinode(name,fn) SystemError: (2, 'No such file or directory') install exited abnormally [1/1] sending termination signals ... done The RHEL 5.3 boot disk is the same as above except the line 900 is 924. I have tried text and GUI and ide=nodma pci=noacpi with both. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 live cd won't boot
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Tblader wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:50:48 -0500: Anyone have a workaround for booting the 5.2 LiveCD? I'm getting this error: no root yet, udev rule will write symlink Then I drop to a shell, with a message to create a symlink to /dev/root and then exit the shell. And that is really the original, downloaded live CD and it *is* booting from a CD/DVD drive? Kai Could you please provide a description of the components in the system you are trying to boot it in? Do you have at least 256-512 MB of RAM? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Cannot get CentOS to install
I used google but did not come up with anything current to solve my problem. I have not tried any other search engines yet. There is not a search for the CentOS list so I am creating a new post. I have tested the CentOS 5.2 and RHEL 5.3 CD's and they passed. I had to use linux mediacheck ide=nodma to get them to pass. The newest releases seem to most times fail with just linux mediacheck. I have tried linux ide=nodma and linux text ide=nodma after trying linux and linux text Anaconda fails on both CentOS 5.2 and RHEL 5.3 in all cases. The system I am trying to install on is running CentOS 3.x. The hardware is P4 2.8 CPU, 512 MB RAM, 120GB 3ware IDE/PATA RAID HD, ATI Video, CDRW CD, Dual Nic, Floppy and IDE/PATA Tape drive. Please provide any options to the kernel that I should try besides the ones mentioned above that fail. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Clonezilla SE with CentOS5
Sorin Srbu wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 2:50 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Clonezilla SE with CentOS5 Does anybody on this list use this solution and can say something about it in the running-Clonezilla-with-CentOS-context, be it recommendations, gotchas', warnings or whatever? I'm using it installed via yum on Centos and it works great. I use a 2-NIC server where machines are normally plugged into the private side in a lab to be imaged via PXE booting but it also works to use a clonezilla-live CD boot anywhere on the network to save or restore. Thanks Les and Thomas. I appreciate the feedback. I'll look into installing this solution. I'm currently using a g4u-based routine with an ftp-server running of off a Win2k3-machine+dhcp. It works, but is slightly awkward to use. Clonezilla seems a bit more worked-on compared and more of a complete solution. Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Please let us know how it works for you. I did not know that you could install it on CentOS. I just started looking at it lately and can not get the live CD to work on new or old hardware. I have used PartImage and hoped it would be easier to use but no luck even getting it up to test yet. Glad to read that someone has gotten it to work. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] iptables: forwarding on internal device
Hello, The system you are trying to forward with has at least two nics on different networks? However you are trying to forward between aliases on one nic that is located on your internal network? And the other nic connects to a DMZ or gateway network? This system is not a decicated routing/forwarding system but runs other services for network clients/servers that connect to it? Michael Marcus Moeller wrote: Hi, iptables -L -v now shows: 0 0 ACCEPT all -- eth0 eth0anywhere anywherestate NEW,RELATED,ESTABLISHED But the packages are still dropped: Feb 9 10:48:20 firewall kernel: DROP-TCP IN=eth0 OUT=eth0 SRC=192.168.100.192 DST=172.28.2.161 LEN=44 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=59 ID=54 PROTO=TCP SPT=9100 DPT=4068 WINDOW=0 RES=0x00 ACK SYN URGP=0 My guess is will ACCEPT packets but since you haven't defined a FORWARD or an OUPUT chain it drops them. As mentioned, I have added a rule like: /sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth0 -m state --state NEW,RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT to forward packages on the internal device. Best Regards Marcus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: ls and rm: argument list too long
Scott Silva wrote: on 10-24-2008 11:19 AM Ed Westphal spake the following: MHR wrote: On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Programming to the lowest common denominator may not feel sexy, but it can prevent many headaches in the future. I spent quite a bit of time many years ago getting a large FORTRAN system working that had been written on a system that use 7 character variable names where standard FORTRAN only permitted 6 (it was amazing how many of the variable names differed only in the 7th character). While this would be relatively easy to deal with today, it was a bitch when all programs were on 80-column punch cards. Okay, now you're officially old. (Like me.) mhr Forgive my senility, but I'm continually amazed how many of us ole fossils are still around, and running Linux! Not to use up too much bandwidth, but the switch from Fortran 2 to 2D, for disk, was a big event way back when. Then Fortran 4 came around! Be still my old heart! ENW When I learned Fortran IV in 1980 my teacher said that Fortran and Cobol were the languages of the future! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I have been learning and using COBOL since the mid 80's. I use COBOL at the present time for Web Programming also. The COBOL we use runs on UNIX and Linux. I use it in addition to PHP/MySQL for Web Programming. I have looked at Fortran programs but never had to learn the language. It is on a PDP 11 that we shutdown in the late 90's. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Michael Peterson wrote on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:03:13 -0500 (CDT): I run a Virtual Host entry without a ServerName directive and have been through several releases of CentOS and Apache and all works fine for me. You can do that, it depends on your configuration. A standard name-based virtual host configuration will not work without a ServerName directive, because it's that directive (and the ServerAlias ones) that has to match what the client sends as Host header. Have a look at the documentation instead of guessing ;-) Kai I did not guess. I have always consulted the documentation first. I have my Apache configuration file setup according the currently available Apache documentation. Pardon my lack of sleep after consulting my configuration file again. I do not use ServerAlias at all. I do use ServerName for all of my VirtualHost entries however. Please do not assume people guess just because they do not provide a link to back up the information they provide. If it is not an answer from experience only, I take it that maybe to please those that need it I should post a link for reference in the future. I am doing tasks with CentOS that are however undocumented other than by me at the present time in some cases however. I have been working with Apache for over 8 years and do not belong to just this list thank you. I consult any available manuals and online documentation first before asking a list anything. After such a blatant insult I should think about dropping this list. But I think other than your lack of disregard for my try at providing assistance to the list. I have something to offer even if no one else is doing the things I am doing with CentOS at the present time. I think for the time being other than a post I am working on to answer a post I made earlier this month that has went unanswered so far that I will just watch and learn and try to keep my fingers quiet as much as possible as far as this list is concerned. In your first sentence you say You can do that, it depends on your configuration. . Did you consult the documentation or are you asking me to do it for you. Here is one of the sources for the Name Virtual Host issue resolutions: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/vhosts/name-based.html This example is straight from the documentation listed above. |NameVirtualHost *:80 VirtualHost *:80 ServerName www.domain.tld ServerAlias domain.tld *.domain.tld DocumentRoot /www/domain /VirtualHost VirtualHost *:80 ServerName www.otherdomain.tld DocumentRoot /www/otherdomain /VirtualHost There is no ServerAlias for the second VirtualHost entry. This is per the Apache standard straight from the available current online documentation. I only use ServerName and have not tried ServerAlias. I hope this solves the NameVIrtualHost issue for the time being at least. | Michael ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:43:24 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:28:39 + (UTC): In other words, ServerName alone fails to distinguish two named virtual hosts. Oh, it sure does. If it is present in both - which it isn't in your config. Kai Yes, a retest confirms your observation. I am therefore left with the need to remove the VirtualHost that has no ServerName. I can access the site with an IP address, which, I think, this is meant to prevent. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos You need to remove the :80 in the VirtualHost declarations that contains Servername entries. I have several Domain and Sub-Domain host names running against one IP using the VirtualHost pratice. My most recent server is running on CentOS 5.2. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems
Michael Peterson wrote on Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:09:54 -0500: You need to remove the :80 in the VirtualHost declarations that contains Servername entries. No, that's perfectly ok and recommended. His problem was that he was using a virtual host without a ServerName directive. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I run a Virtual Host entry without a ServerName directive and have been through several releases of CentOS and Apache and all works fine for me. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Trying to use CentOS 5.2 to make a WAN Router
I have a CIDR block of IP addresses that I need to pass through to a WAN. I am trying to have a CentOS 5.2 basic install with 2 NICs be the router/gateway between the WAN and the public IP CIDR block. Has anyone done this? Other than turning on IP forwarding what did you have to do? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Unable to install CentOS 5.2 on New HP Intel Core 2 Quad
Our new lab has HP Intel Core 2 Quad systems with DVD/CDRW and SATA. I can provide the model number if needed. They stop on kernel startup when trying to boot the CentOS 5.2 boot CD. It is during ACPI. I have tried linux noprobe and linux pci=noacpi and linux noprobe pci=noacpi. I still cannot get to the first install screen. Fedora 10 Live will not but up either. I am using Fedora 9 from Live and DVD Install to teach a fall class and it works fine. Would CentOS 5.3 possibly work once it is released? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Boot CentOS 5 to command line
Once you boot into GUI you can login as root or login as a user and once in a terminal window su - to root and then change the line in /etc/inittab from id:5:initdefault: to id:3:initdefault: You can also do init 3 after saving the change to see what will happen before rebooting. This will keep the GUI login from being run and boot all enabled console screens and leave you at a character login. The way to boot without any services as needed is to login as root or become root with su - once the system is booted into runlevel 3 or 5 and do init 1 or telinit 1. This will put the system in single user runlevel and shut off all services similar to rescue mode. This would only allow you work from the console until you changed back to runlevel 3 or 5. _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ABBAS KHAN Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 1:46 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Boot CentOS 5 to command line Hi fellows, Pretty new to CentOS. I was trying to find a way to boot CentOS into command prompt instead of GUI (or without loading any services). Tried using 'Crl+Alt+F1' at the boot process, but, that holds the screen at mounting and doing fstab and doesn't proceed further. Is there anyother way to boot CentOS into command prompt without using Rescue option from the installation CD? Thanks. Best. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Virtual Box
Has anyone else tried and successfully installed CentOS 5.1 into the latest (1.62) Virtual Box in Windows XP Pro? I can get Ubuntu and EasyS to install fine but CentOS and Fedora so far fail to install even after several attempts. With CentOS 5.1 it keeps saying not enough disk space even if I allocate 32 GB and 64 GB of virtual space. I have at least 40+ GB free on the hard drive. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.3.0/1505 - Release Date: 6/16/2008 7:20 AM ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] mdmonitor not triggering program on fail events
What version of CentOS are you running? Are you looking at root emails or having them forwarded to your local or system account? I have CentOS 5.1 running with Software RAID in place and I have a hard drive failing. I received an email first from SMART and then from MDADM that the drive was going bad. These occurred automatically. I have root emails forwarded to my local account on the system and then I check the email through pop via dovecot to get them. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ow Mun Heng Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:26 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] mdmonitor not triggering program on fail events No One has any clues?? On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 12:11 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote: Hi, Can anyone help me with this since I want to get it done the correct way I'm trying to make mdmonitor to execute a program when it detects a fail event automatically. Currently, from what I see, init is calling mdmonitor with these options mdadm --monitor --scan -f (note that the --program is not there) and this is in my /etc/mdadm.conf MAILADDR root PROGRAM /root/program_2_run.sh short of hacking the mdmonitor script to hardcode the program there, is there an alternate, more elegant way? Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.3.0/1499 - Release Date: 6/12/2008 7:13 AM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.3.0/1499 - Release Date: 6/12/2008 7:13 AM ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] COBOL
We use COBOL on Unix. I have worked with NCR/ATT Unix and since 1995 have been supporting COBOL on SCO Unix. I am in the process of porting to CentOS and RHEL. We use RM/COBOL. It is supported by Liant at www.liant.com We use it for internal and Internet programming. They also support Web Services using COBOL. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 1:47 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] COBOL Just curious, maybe some old timers could help me out. I am working with a company that is migrating 20 years of Mainframe Software Development to Unix, HPUX. How much harder would it be to go to Linux, Centos Linux? Also, anyone have any experience with Fujitsu Cobol on Centos? The Fujitsu people only support Red Hat, and said I'd be on my own with Centos. In other words if it works, then I don't care about Fujitsu support. I know some of you are thinking, did someone say COBOL? Nobody uses COBOL anymore! If so, let me say You are wrong. Many large corporations are taking their old business logic that was written in COBOL decades ago, and moving it to new modern platforms, like Linux. Programatically giving these applications a GUI face-lift, while maintaining their original business logic. I know because many companies pay me to do just that. I have a client that wants to use Centos Linux with Fujistu Cobol, and Fujitsu says it's gotta be Red Hat, any help will much appreciated. Thanks, -- Michael Anderson, J3k Solutions Sr.Systems Programmer/Analyst 832.515.3868 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] clustered mail server?
It works fine with Dovecot also. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David G. Mackay Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 10:05 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] clustered mail server? On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 10:30 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: Thank you for your input. I can't justify exchange (and don't want MS) for 10 users. I do want IMAP though, and the calendar address book would be nice. This IMO has nothing todo with CentOS though, but at the same time it shouldn't be limited to which Linux distro I'm using. As you have said I may need to look at file system clustering instead, but have never attempted it, so I don't know where to begin even. I know a lot of MTA's can support a central user DB, but that won't sync the emails. And this won't be a commercial installation either, it's for a for a project in a rural community about 700km's from me, so it's more a matter of if 1 server dies / crashes / packes up, and I can only get to it 5 days later, the mail server still works :) You might take a look at SquirrelMail. It integrates well with cyrus imap. Dave ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
