Re: [CentOS] Is there any way I can deploy cPanel web hosting control panel with Microsoft Exchange 2016 groupware behind one static public IP?

[Richard Grainger]

You can use bind your cPanel web server to a different port or
(better) you can put your services behind a reverse proxy/load
balancer. In this scenario, for web servers running on the standard
ports (ie TCP 80 and 443), you can use HTTP host headers/SNI to
redirect requests to the appropriate backend web server based on the
domain name used.

So yes, you can have a whole bunch of stuff running behind one public
IP address if you're willing to cope with the complexity.  But
sometimes life is simpler if you can use more.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 4:45 PM Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
 wrote:
>
> Good evening from Singapore,
>
>
> Is there any way I can deploy cPanel web hosting control panel with Microsoft 
> Exchange 2016 groupware behind one static public IP? Or do I need 2 static 
> public IP addresses at the minimum? With Exchange 2016 groupware taking up 
> HTTP, HTTPS, IMAP, IMAPS, POP3, POP3S, SMTP, and SMTP/S ports, I personally 
> don't think I can deploy cPanel behind the same public IP as Exchange.
>
>
> Please advise. Perhaps you have a brilliant idea. This is for experimental, 
> testing and laboratory purposes.
>
>
> Thank you very much.
>
>
> ===BEGIN SIGNATURE===
>
> Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic Qualifications as at 30 Oct 2017
>
> [1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/
>
> [2] http://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/
>
> [3] 
> https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming
>
> ===END SIGNATURE===
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Updated krb5 rpm package altered existing krb5.conf - No go

[Richard Grainger]

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 6:56 PM Götz Reinicke
 wrote:

> /etc/krb5.conf
>
I looked at the spec file in the source RPM for the krb5-libs package
and it it has the correct %config(noreplace) directive next to that
file in the %files section, so this is mysterious.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Updated krb5 rpm package altered existing krb5.conf - No go

[Richard Grainger]

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 3:54 PM Götz Reinicke
 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I did an centos update from 7.4 to 7.5 and the krb5 package altered the 
> existing and used config file! That should be a no go from my pov, as in my 
> setup it broke some services which had a problem with the includedir line 
> which was added.

Which config file?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How do I get the kernel srpm?

[Richard Grainger]

yumdownloader --source kernel

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 9:35 PM, Robert Heller  wrote:
> I tried to follow the work flow shown in https://wiki.centos.org/Sources, but
> it does not seem to work:
>
> I did this:
>
> mkdir CentOS
> pushd CentOS
> git clone https://git.centos.org/git/centos-git-common.git
> git clone https://git.centos.org/git/rpms/kernel.git
> pushd kernel/
> git checkout c6
> ../centos-git-common/get_sources.sh
>
> And I got the message:
>
> Missing metadata. Please run from inside a sources git repo
>
> What am I missing?
>
>
> --
> Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
> Deepwoods Software-- Custom Software Services
> http://www.deepsoft.com/  -- Linux Administration Services
> hel...@deepsoft.com   -- Webhosting Services
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Semi-OT: install python package in userspace

[Richard Grainger]

If you can use python3 rather than python2, it looks like the
dependencies in the standard repos are new enough.  Do you want me to
have a go at packaging scikit-learn for python3 and adding it to the
repo?

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Richard Grainger <grain...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just had a look at scikit-learn.  An issue you have with the current
> version of this package is that is depends on NumPy (>= 1.8.2).  The
> version of NumPy in CentOS 7 base is 1.7.1. You may need to look at
> building a Python virtual environment.  You can google that ;)
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:43 AM, Richard Grainger <grain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I created the epypel (Extra Extra Python Packages for Enterprise
>> Linux) yum repo for exactly this reason:
>> https://harbottle.gitlab.io/epypel/
>>
>> There are a bunch of additional Python 2 and Python 3 packages there
>> and if you want any added, please put in a request here:
>> https://gitlab.com/harbottle/epypel/issues/new
>>
>> The repo does not upgrade any packages in base or EPEL, so should be
>> safe to use on most CentOS 7 systems.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 5:25 PM,  <m.r...@5-cent.us> wrote:
>>> CentOS 7 box. As there's no package in any of the repos, we're trying to
>>> install scikit-learn in the user's space. It refuses. My late try was,
>>> after d/l a .whl from last year, hoping that would work with the numpy
>>> package in the regular repos, I did a pip install --user scikit-learn...,
>>> and it still seems to want to write to system space: OSError: [Errno 13]
>>> Permission denied:
>>> '/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/numpy-1.7.1.dist-info
>>>
>>> Anyone got any pointers?
>>>
>>>mark
>>>
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Semi-OT: install python package in userspace

[Richard Grainger]

Just had a look at scikit-learn.  An issue you have with the current
version of this package is that is depends on NumPy (>= 1.8.2).  The
version of NumPy in CentOS 7 base is 1.7.1. You may need to look at
building a Python virtual environment.  You can google that ;)

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:43 AM, Richard Grainger <grain...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I created the epypel (Extra Extra Python Packages for Enterprise
> Linux) yum repo for exactly this reason:
> https://harbottle.gitlab.io/epypel/
>
> There are a bunch of additional Python 2 and Python 3 packages there
> and if you want any added, please put in a request here:
> https://gitlab.com/harbottle/epypel/issues/new
>
> The repo does not upgrade any packages in base or EPEL, so should be
> safe to use on most CentOS 7 systems.
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 5:25 PM,  <m.r...@5-cent.us> wrote:
>> CentOS 7 box. As there's no package in any of the repos, we're trying to
>> install scikit-learn in the user's space. It refuses. My late try was,
>> after d/l a .whl from last year, hoping that would work with the numpy
>> package in the regular repos, I did a pip install --user scikit-learn...,
>> and it still seems to want to write to system space: OSError: [Errno 13]
>> Permission denied:
>> '/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/numpy-1.7.1.dist-info
>>
>> Anyone got any pointers?
>>
>>mark
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Semi-OT: install python package in userspace

[Richard Grainger]

I created the epypel (Extra Extra Python Packages for Enterprise
Linux) yum repo for exactly this reason:
https://harbottle.gitlab.io/epypel/

There are a bunch of additional Python 2 and Python 3 packages there
and if you want any added, please put in a request here:
https://gitlab.com/harbottle/epypel/issues/new

The repo does not upgrade any packages in base or EPEL, so should be
safe to use on most CentOS 7 systems.

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 5:25 PM,   wrote:
> CentOS 7 box. As there's no package in any of the repos, we're trying to
> install scikit-learn in the user's space. It refuses. My late try was,
> after d/l a .whl from last year, hoping that would work with the numpy
> package in the regular repos, I did a pip install --user scikit-learn...,
> and it still seems to want to write to system space: OSError: [Errno 13]
> Permission denied:
> '/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/numpy-1.7.1.dist-info
>
> Anyone got any pointers?
>
>mark
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How Can I ...

[Richard Grainger]

If your CentOS machine has graphics (Gnome etc), you should be able to point 
your file browser at smb://ip_address/share_name

> On 23 Mar 2018, at 23:22, Christian, Mark  wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 22:57 +, Tom Bishop wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 5:50 PM Eugene Poole  wrote:
>>> 
>>> I've got a WD My Passport Ultra 1TB (USB) plugged into my router and I
>>> have 4 Windows machines, all running Windows 7, and all 4 machines can
>>> see the device as drive 'Y'. I use this device several ways, i.e. all my
>>> Windows machines use the same Firefox bookmarks and cookies
>>> 
>>> I've got 5 machines running CentOS 6 x86_64 and I'd like to know what do
>>> I have to do for them to 'see' that same 1TB device? Right now I use
>>> winscp to get the data from CentOS and save it on the device via Windows.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Eugene Poole
>>> Woodstock, Georgia
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> 
>> 
>> I would assume they are being shared via smb for your windows machines, I
>> would read up on accessing winblows file shares with centos. Most likely
>> you will need to install samba in order to see the shares.
>> 
>> If you can provide more details on how the router is sharing the files for
>> windows we can provide more detailed guidance.
> something similar to this might work for you
> 
> $ sudo mount.cifs //192.168.1.254/share /mnt -ouser=route_account,vers=2.0
> 
> 
> vers=2.0 might not be necessary for you if your router supports more modern
> versions of smb or if you are not running a newish kernel that defaults to 3.0
> 
> man mount.cifs 
> 
> The default since v4.13.5 is for the client and server to negotiate the 
> highest
> possible version greater than or equal to 2.1. In kernels prior to v4.13, the
> default was 1.0. For kernels between v4.13 and v4.13.5 the default is 3.0.
> 
> Mark
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] selinux: how to allow access?

[Richard Grainger]

> Yet again I could not find any documentation explaining how to do basic
> things like this :(  Selinux is more like a curse than anything else :( Why
> is there not even a good documentation?

More trolling?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Best practices to manager multiples sysadmins working as root with multiple servers?

[Richard Grainger]

My suggestion, if you have the freedom to design a solution from
scratch, is to look at FreeIPA and sssd.  With these tools you can
easily centralise your access and sudo rules. You can use any
configuration management tool to get things up and running (I like
Puppet, but your mileage may vary).

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 3:30 PM, marcos sr  wrote:
> Hello
>
> In my new company they have a lot of CentOS linux servers. I was wondering
> what is the best practice do manage access root to a multiples sysadmin in
> multiple servers.
>
> Pupper? Ldap? Proxy Server with ssh?
>
> Thanks for attention.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] RADIUS

[Richard Grainger]

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 1:57 PM, hw <h...@gc-24.de> wrote:
> Richard Grainger wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:56 PM, hw <h...@gc-24.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> That requires some way to distinguish between customers, and it means
>>> that distinguishing between devices is not sufficient for registered
>>> customers.
>>
>>
>> Once the customer logs into the captive web portal on the guest WiFi
>> SSID you know who they are and can set limits accordingly.
>
>
> How do I deploy such a captive portal?  It seems that a wireless controller
> can do that, but I don´t have one (yet).

I can't recommend a particular commercial product or free solution, sorry.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] RADIUS

[Richard Grainger]

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:56 PM, hw  wrote:
> That requires some way to distinguish between customers, and it means
> that distinguishing between devices is not sufficient for registered
> customers.

Once the customer logs into the captive web portal on the guest WiFi
SSID you know who they are and can set limits accordingly.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] RADIUS

[Richard Grainger]

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:22 AM, hw  wrote:

> As a customer visting a store, would you go to the lengths of configuring
> your
> cell phone (or other wireless device) to authenticate with a RADIUS server
> in
> order to gain internet access through the wirless network of the store?
>
> From what I´m being told, everyone already has internet access with their
> cell
> phones from their phone service provider and is apparently happy with that
> even though the amount of data they can transmit is ridiculously low.  So
> why
> would anyone do any configuring and have to worry about protecting ther
> privacy
> when and for using the wireless network of a shop they´re visting?
>
> I have no idea what the lengths of configuring might be other than that
> anything
> you try to do with a cell phone or a tablet is so extremely painful or
> outright
> impossible that I only touch them when I get paid for it.  Perhaps RADIUS
> authentication is easy with such devices.

Corporate mobile devices are typically configured using MDM to already
have the company 802.1x profile so they "just work" on the corporate
WiFi.  Guest mobile devices will connect to another SSID, which
usually only allows access to the internet (sometimes after agreeing
to a AUP via a captive web portal).
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] RADIUS

[Richard Grainger]

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:25 AM, hw  wrote:

> But MAC addresses can be faked, can´t they?

Yes, someone can go to the trouble of obtaining a known corporate MAC
address and MAC-spoofing their personal device so they can PXE-boot a
corporate build on a VLAN that is otherwise useless.  If your
corporate build on it's own is precious enough in itself that you
worry about this eventuality, then make the build server insist on
authentication before the build initiates.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] RADIUS

[Richard Grainger]

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:33 AM, hw  wrote:

> That would be a problem because clients using PXE-boot require network
> access,
> and it wouldn´t contribute to security if unauthorized clients were allwed
> to
> PXE-boot.

Two solutions to this:

1. Enable "exception by MAC address": only known MAC addresses get put
onto the PXE boot VLAN. Other unauthenticated client goes onto a "no
access" VLAN (many places make this the same VLAN as the guest WiFi
VLAN with internet access only, sometimes with a captive portal).
Authenticated clients go onto the corporate VLAN.
2. (this can be in addition or instead of 1).  The PXE server itself
will only serve known MAC addresses and/or requires a token/password
to initiate the install.  Regardless, there's not huge utility to
installing your personal machine with a corporate build from a PXE
server, which you then can't use because you don;t have corporate
credentials, but I suppose it may have some risk with regards to
software licensing or builds containing other stuff you don't want
strangers to access, so lockdowns can't hurt.

> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] which group for running docker as a regular user on CentOS 7

[Richard Grainger]

On my system it is just a group called "docker". Your mileage may vary.

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:20 AM, soko.tica  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have installed docker and would like to run the containers without sudo.
>
> I have placed myself in dockerroot group, but still to no avail. Centos
> doesn't have the operator group.
>
> What should I do?
>
> Thanks in advance
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

[Richard Grainger]

Nux!:

SRPMS published: https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/SRPMS/

Cheers!

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Richard Grainger <grain...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, I will look into getting the SRPMS up on the site (though they are
> just the ones from EPEL anyway).
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> That's great, I know many people were looking for this.
>>
>> Any chance you can also publish the SRPMs?
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Richard Grainger" <grain...@gmail.com>
>> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
>> > Sent: Sunday, 8 October, 2017 19:43:57
>> > Subject: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7
>>
>> > Hi all
>> >
>> > I've created a yum repo for 32 bit wine packages on RHEL and CentOS 7:
>> >
>> > https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/
>> >
>> > The Wine packages work on both 32 bit and 64 bit RHEL/CentOS 7. There
>> is no
>> > 32 bit version of the EPEL repo, where the standard RHEL/CentOS Wine
>> > packages can be found, so you may find this new repo useful if you need
>> to
>> > run Windows software that requires the 32 bit version of Wine.
>> >
>> > The packages are all built from the EPEL source RPMs.  I had to tweak
>> the
>> > spec file for wine itself slightly, but for the dependencies it's all
>> pure
>> > rebuilds.
>> >
>> > Instructions:
>> >
>> > Code:
>> > yum -y install https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wi
>> ne32/7/i386/wine32-release.rpm
>> > yum -y install wine.i686
>> >
>> >
>> > Please give it a try and tell me what you think!  It probably needs more
>> > testing.
>> > ___
>> > CentOS mailing list
>> > CentOS@centos.org
>> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

[Richard Grainger]

Ah, no, those are just wine dependencies from epel. No base updates :)

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:

> Richard,
>
> I haven't checked, but I see more than wine packages in that repo, hence
> my thoughts about that.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Richard Grainger" <grain...@gmail.com>
> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> > Sent: Monday, 9 October, 2017 14:29:03
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS
> 7
>
> > Shouldn't be anything overwriting Base...what do you think does so?
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> >
> >> Ah, ok. I was wondering how you  managed to build that, because when I
> >> tried it did not work, but I see you have backported also other bits and
> >> bobs.
> >> If those overwrite Base, perhaps add a warning of sorts.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >>
> >> Nux!
> >> www.nux.ro
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >> > From: "Richard Grainger" <grain...@gmail.com>
> >> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> >> > Sent: Monday, 9 October, 2017 13:28:22
> >> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and
> CentOS
> >> 7
> >>
> >> > Yes, I will look into getting the SRPMS up on the site (though they
> are
> >> > just the ones from EPEL anyway).
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hello,
> >> >>
> >> >> That's great, I know many people were looking for this.
> >> >>
> >> >> Any chance you can also publish the SRPMs?
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >> >>
> >> >> Nux!
> >> >> www.nux.ro
> >> >>
> >> >> - Original Message -
> >> >> > From: "Richard Grainger" <grain...@gmail.com>
> >> >> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> >> >> > Sent: Sunday, 8 October, 2017 19:43:57
> >> >> > Subject: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and
> CentOS 7
> >> >>
> >> >> > Hi all
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I've created a yum repo for 32 bit wine packages on RHEL and
> CentOS 7:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The Wine packages work on both 32 bit and 64 bit RHEL/CentOS 7.
> There
> >> is
> >> >> no
> >> >> > 32 bit version of the EPEL repo, where the standard RHEL/CentOS
> Wine
> >> >> > packages can be found, so you may find this new repo useful if you
> >> need
> >> >> to
> >> >> > run Windows software that requires the 32 bit version of Wine.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The packages are all built from the EPEL source RPMs.  I had to
> tweak
> >> the
> >> >> > spec file for wine itself slightly, but for the dependencies it's
> all
> >> >> pure
> >> >> > rebuilds.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Instructions:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Code:
> >> >> > yum -y install https://harbottle.gitlab.io/
> >> wine32/7/i386/wine32-release.
> >> >> rpm
> >> >> > yum -y install wine.i686
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Please give it a try and tell me what you think!  It probably needs
> >> more
> >> >> > testing.
> >> >> > ___
> >> >> > CentOS mailing list
> >> >> > CentOS@centos.org
> >> >> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >> >> ___
> >> >> CentOS mailing list
> >> >> CentOS@centos.org
> >> >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >> >>
> >> > ___
> >> > CentOS mailing list
> >> > CentOS@centos.org
> >> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >> ___
> >> CentOS mailing list
> >> CentOS@centos.org
> >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >>
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

[Richard Grainger]

Shouldn't be anything overwriting Base...what do you think does so?

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:

> Ah, ok. I was wondering how you  managed to build that, because when I
> tried it did not work, but I see you have backported also other bits and
> bobs.
> If those overwrite Base, perhaps add a warning of sorts.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Richard Grainger" <grain...@gmail.com>
> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> > Sent: Monday, 9 October, 2017 13:28:22
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS
> 7
>
> > Yes, I will look into getting the SRPMS up on the site (though they are
> > just the ones from EPEL anyway).
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> That's great, I know many people were looking for this.
> >>
> >> Any chance you can also publish the SRPMs?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >>
> >> Nux!
> >> www.nux.ro
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >> > From: "Richard Grainger" <grain...@gmail.com>
> >> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> >> > Sent: Sunday, 8 October, 2017 19:43:57
> >> > Subject: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7
> >>
> >> > Hi all
> >> >
> >> > I've created a yum repo for 32 bit wine packages on RHEL and CentOS 7:
> >> >
> >> > https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/
> >> >
> >> > The Wine packages work on both 32 bit and 64 bit RHEL/CentOS 7. There
> is
> >> no
> >> > 32 bit version of the EPEL repo, where the standard RHEL/CentOS Wine
> >> > packages can be found, so you may find this new repo useful if you
> need
> >> to
> >> > run Windows software that requires the 32 bit version of Wine.
> >> >
> >> > The packages are all built from the EPEL source RPMs.  I had to tweak
> the
> >> > spec file for wine itself slightly, but for the dependencies it's all
> >> pure
> >> > rebuilds.
> >> >
> >> > Instructions:
> >> >
> >> > Code:
> >> > yum -y install https://harbottle.gitlab.io/
> wine32/7/i386/wine32-release.
> >> rpm
> >> > yum -y install wine.i686
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Please give it a try and tell me what you think!  It probably needs
> more
> >> > testing.
> >> > ___
> >> > CentOS mailing list
> >> > CentOS@centos.org
> >> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >> ___
> >> CentOS mailing list
> >> CentOS@centos.org
> >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >>
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

[Richard Grainger]

Yes, I will look into getting the SRPMS up on the site (though they are
just the ones from EPEL anyway).

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> That's great, I know many people were looking for this.
>
> Any chance you can also publish the SRPMs?
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -
> > From: "Richard Grainger" <grain...@gmail.com>
> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, 8 October, 2017 19:43:57
> > Subject: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > I've created a yum repo for 32 bit wine packages on RHEL and CentOS 7:
> >
> > https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/
> >
> > The Wine packages work on both 32 bit and 64 bit RHEL/CentOS 7. There is
> no
> > 32 bit version of the EPEL repo, where the standard RHEL/CentOS Wine
> > packages can be found, so you may find this new repo useful if you need
> to
> > run Windows software that requires the 32 bit version of Wine.
> >
> > The packages are all built from the EPEL source RPMs.  I had to tweak the
> > spec file for wine itself slightly, but for the dependencies it's all
> pure
> > rebuilds.
> >
> > Instructions:
> >
> > Code:
> > yum -y install https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/wine32-release.
> rpm
> > yum -y install wine.i686
> >
> >
> > Please give it a try and tell me what you think!  It probably needs more
> > testing.
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

[Richard Grainger]

Yes, works fine alongside 64 bit wine from EPEL. :)

Sent from my iPhone

> On 9 Oct 2017, at 02:03, Peter <pe...@pajamian.dhs.org> wrote:
> 
> This is great, thank you very much!
> 
> Did you make it parallel-installable to the 64 bit wine from epel?
> 
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
>> On 09/10/17 07:43, Richard Grainger wrote:
>> Hi all
>> 
>> I've created a yum repo for 32 bit wine packages on RHEL and CentOS 7:
>> 
>> https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/
>> 
>> The Wine packages work on both 32 bit and 64 bit RHEL/CentOS 7. There is no
>> 32 bit version of the EPEL repo, where the standard RHEL/CentOS Wine
>> packages can be found, so you may find this new repo useful if you need to
>> run Windows software that requires the 32 bit version of Wine.
>> 
>> The packages are all built from the EPEL source RPMs.  I had to tweak the
>> spec file for wine itself slightly, but for the dependencies it's all pure
>> rebuilds.
>> 
>> Instructions:
>> 
>> Code:
>> yum -y install https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/wine32-release.rpm
>> yum -y install wine.i686
>> 
>> 
>> Please give it a try and tell me what you think!  It probably needs more
>> testing.
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

[Richard Grainger]

Yeah, forget that.  Yum/DNF all the things! ;)

On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Vitalino Victor <vitalin...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks!
>
> This is much useful.
>
> Now, no compile wine 32-bit is more required hehe
>
> https://github.com/zma/usefulscripts/blob/master/script/install-wine-i686-
> centos7.sh
>
>
>
> 2017-10-08 15:43 GMT-03:00 Richard Grainger <grain...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > I've created a yum repo for 32 bit wine packages on RHEL and CentOS 7:
> >
> > https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/
> >
> > The Wine packages work on both 32 bit and 64 bit RHEL/CentOS 7. There is
> no
> > 32 bit version of the EPEL repo, where the standard RHEL/CentOS Wine
> > packages can be found, so you may find this new repo useful if you need
> to
> > run Windows software that requires the 32 bit version of Wine.
> >
> > The packages are all built from the EPEL source RPMs.  I had to tweak the
> > spec file for wine itself slightly, but for the dependencies it's all
> pure
> > rebuilds.
> >
> > Instructions:
> >
> > Code:
> > yum -y install https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/wine32-release.
> > rpm
> > yum -y install wine.i686
> >
> >
> > Please give it a try and tell me what you think!  It probably needs more
> > testing.
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

[Richard Grainger]

Hi all

I've created a yum repo for 32 bit wine packages on RHEL and CentOS 7:

https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/

The Wine packages work on both 32 bit and 64 bit RHEL/CentOS 7. There is no
32 bit version of the EPEL repo, where the standard RHEL/CentOS Wine
packages can be found, so you may find this new repo useful if you need to
run Windows software that requires the 32 bit version of Wine.

The packages are all built from the EPEL source RPMs.  I had to tweak the
spec file for wine itself slightly, but for the dependencies it's all pure
rebuilds.

Instructions:

Code:
yum -y install https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/i386/wine32-release.rpm
yum -y install wine.i686


Please give it a try and tell me what you think!  It probably needs more
testing.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Airprint to old printer using Centos server

[Richard Grainger]

Hi Gary

I got this working in a previous role a while ago:
http://thirdlineit.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/active-directory-authenticated-airprint.html
(ignore the authentication aspects).  I also managed to do it recently
on my home network using Ubuntu, so the principle still works.
Summary:

1. Install CUPS
2. Enable IPP for the printer queues
3. To make the printers visible across subnets/VLANs/broadcast domains
you can use DNS-SD instead of avahi.  Basically you just need to
create special DNS records for each printer queue and this avoids
having to forward avahi requests.  Here is one page that describes the
process: 
http://www.craig-tolley.co.uk/mini-projects/configuring-airprint-using-dns/
...but there are other guides out there.

Hope this helps!
Richard


On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Gary Stainburn  wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've found a number of articles on setting up a Linux / CUPS / Avahi server to
> allow airprinting, but they all seem to be quite old.
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1) Does anyone have a link for a more recent article, hopefully specifically
> for Centos7.
>
> 2) I'm on a structured, VLAN network.  Will I have to put a WIFI card into my
> Centos server to give it a presence on the WIFI before this will work?
>
> Gary
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Announcement: new yum repos

[Richard Grainger]

Hi

I've created a couple of new public yum repos suitable for CentOS 7:

ergel (Extra Ruby Gems for Enterprise Linux)

repo: https://harbottle.gitlab.io/ergel/7/x86_64/
homepage: https://gitlab.com/harbottle/ergel

epmel (Extra Perl Modules for Enterprise Linux)

repo: https://harbottle.gitlab.io/epmel/7/x86_64/
homepage: https://gitlab.com/harbottle/epmel

The repos are designed to work in conjunction with EPEL, so you will
need this installed first and they should be "safe" (they don't
upgrade packages in base).

Feedback and requests for additions welcome!

Cheers
Richard
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos