Re: [CentOS] /etc/rc5.d

2008-09-11 Thread Romeo Ninov


[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote / napísal(a):

I have a shell script, /usr/bin/joevpn, which does a quick VPN
connect.  Basically (HOST and DOFIL are defined above and are correct.
I just did not list them here)

 case $1 in

 start)
date  $DOFIL
while [ -f $DOFIL ]
do
echo y | /usr/local/bin/vpnclient connect $HOST
sleep 10
done
;;
# Reconnects in case of disconnect (in while loop)
This works.  And in /etc/init.d I have a runjoevpn (which linked to
/etc/rc5.d/S99runjoevpn).  It works like the others.  Below, $1 is checked
(not shown here for brevity) and if it is start then start below is
called:

  start() {
date  /root/joe.log
/usr/bin/joevpn start 
RES=$?
return $RES
  }

This all works and everything.  I am just curious as to why when I do
a ps I get this:
/bin/bash /etc/rc5.d/S99runjoevpn

Shouldn't that init script terminate since I have an  when I do the
start() function above? No other rc5 stuff (i.e. tomcat for instance)
shows up in the ps, though tomcat is running, it started up and returned.
Is this OK or am I missing something?

  
Because you start it each 10 seconds and because of while construction 
the start script NEVER end

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list

2008-09-05 Thread Romeo Ninov



[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote / napísal(a):

Lanny Marcus  scribbled on Friday, September 05, 2008 12:18 AM:

  

You have been approved for payment the sum of ?1,000,000:00 (One
Million Great British Pounds)
  

Like everyone else on the list, we could use the $



Great British Pound? I didn't know UK stopped using Pounds Sterling... ;-)
  

Sorin, before try to be funny maybe it is very wise to check the situation:

http://www.xe.com/iso4217.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_sterling
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list

2008-09-05 Thread Romeo Ninov



Sorin Srbu  wrote / napísal(a):

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Romeo Ninov
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:24 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list



You have been approved for payment the sum of ?1,000,000:00 (One
Million Great British Pounds)

  

Like everyone else on the list, we could use the $



Great British Pound? I didn't know UK stopped using Pounds Sterling... ;-)

  

Sorin, before try to be funny maybe it is very wise to check the situation:

http://www.xe.com/iso4217.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_sterling



I did. Just forgot to paste in the wiki-link. To fast fingers. 8-) Does anybody 
actually ever use the formal long name?
  
  
According to my personal experience not so often, but at the end that's 
official form, ISO standard like two letters counthry ISO codes RO, BG, 
GB, etc

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] kickstart problems

2008-09-04 Thread Romeo Ninov



Paolo Supino  wrote / napísal(a):



On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Marco Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


hi,

we had the same problem with newer HP pcs and servers (broadcom nics).
pxe works well on broadcom, the install not. doesn't matter if you're
using kickstart or manual install.

the problem was in centos 4.2. after updating the install
environment to
4.5 the problem was gone... so it was a driver issue! the install
kernel
is not exactly the normal linux kernel i think.

if anaconda just says that it cannot find install image, etc. the
system
has no connectivity at this time.

hope this is helpful...

bests
 marco

Paolo Supino wrote:


 On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Romeo Ninov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Paolo Supino  wrote / napísal(a):



 On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Romeo Ninov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Paolo Supino  wrote / napísal(a):



On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:14 AM, nate
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi Nate
   

3: After the error comes up I get the HTTP setup
configuration
   screen with
the source website (in IP) and CentOS
directory as I
 entered
   them in the
pxeconfiguration file and as it appears in
the kickstart
   configuration file
and all I have to do is press the 'OK' button to
 continue the
   installation
to a successful completion.

   If that's the case the next most likely culprit is

url --url http://192.168.11.1/source


   Just because the PXE boot loader can download the
 kickstart
   config does not mean that the installation process
 will work
   with that NIC.

   Also I've had lots of broadcom systems not
work with
kickstart over
   the years, it's not uncommon for newer systems
to have
 newer
   revs of the chipsets and those revs not being
 supported by the
   installer.

   But it sounds like in your case it does work, so I
 would look
   at the url above, as it likely is the cause of the
 problem.
Check
   the http access logs on the server for 404s and
 similar errors.

   nate

   ___
   CentOS mailing list
   CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org
mailto:CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org
 mailto:CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org
mailto:CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org
mailto:CentOS@centos.org
mailto:CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org
mailto:CentOS@centos.org
 mailto:CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org
mailto:CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org


   http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



Hi Nate

 After figuring what I was doing wrong (see
previous reply
...) I started going through each of my systems
in order to
boot them and install CentOS 5.2 on each. For the
most
 part it
works, but only for the most part? Because once
in a few
 boots
(not machine specific) anaconda stops and either
asks me what
interface it needs to configure

Re: [CentOS] kickstart problems

2008-09-04 Thread Romeo Ninov



Paolo Supino  wrote / napísal(a):


On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Romeo Ninov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




Paolo Supino  wrote / napísal(a):



On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Marco Fretz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   hi,

   we had the same problem with newer HP pcs and servers
(broadcom nics).
   pxe works well on broadcom, the install not. doesn't matter
if you're
   using kickstart or manual install.

   the problem was in centos 4.2. after updating the install
   environment to
   4.5 the problem was gone... so it was a driver issue! the
install
   kernel
   is not exactly the normal linux kernel i think.

   if anaconda just says that it cannot find install image,
etc. the
   system
   has no connectivity at this time.

   hope this is helpful...

   bests
marco

   Paolo Supino wrote:
   
   
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Romeo Ninov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
   
   
Paolo Supino  wrote / napísal(a):
   
   
   
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Romeo Ninov
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
   
   
   Paolo Supino  wrote / napísal(a):
   
   
   
   On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:14 AM, nate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
  Paolo Supino wrote:
   Hi Nate
  
   
   3: After the error comes up I get the
HTTP setup
   configuration
  screen with
   the source website (in IP) and CentOS
   directory as I
entered
  them in the
   pxeconfiguration file and as it
appears in
   the kickstart
  configuration file
   and all I have to do is press the
'OK' button to
continue the
  installation
   to a successful completion.
   
  If that's the case the next most likely
culprit is
   
   url --url http://192.168.11.1/source
   
   
  Just because the PXE boot loader can
download the
kickstart
  config does not mean that the
installation process
will work
  with that NIC.
   
  Also I've had lots of broadcom systems not
   work with
   kickstart over

Re: [CentOS] A new blog on the block for Linux newbies

2008-09-04 Thread Romeo Ninov



[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote / napísal(a):

Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd  scribbled on Wednesday, September 03,
2008 11:13 PM:

  

2) Why can you possibly help if you yourself are a newbie? It's just the
blind leading the blind.



I've noticed that sometimes only a not-so-new-newbie can help another newbie.
A pro can sometimes not see the problem from the newbies perspective, or
relate even, for the reason he or she *is* a pro and passed the obstacles
years ago. Get my drift?
  
Absolute true, but very often newbie ever if find/detect the problem 
give stupid/dangerous/senseless solution/idea. SO maybe there should be 
some balance and cooperation :-)

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] A new blog on the block for Linux newbies

2008-09-04 Thread Romeo Ninov


Anne Wilson  wrote / napísal(a):

On Thursday 04 September 2008 10:03:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Romeo Ninov  scribbled on Thursday, September 04, 2008 10:36 AM:


2) Why can you possibly help if you yourself are a newbie? It's just
the blind leading the blind.
  

I've noticed that sometimes only a not-so-new-newbie can help another
newbie. A pro can sometimes not see the problem from the newbies
perspective, or relate even, for the reason he or she *is* a pro and
passed the obstacles years ago. Get my drift?


Absolute true, but very often newbie ever if find/detect the problem
give stupid/dangerous/senseless solution/idea. SO maybe there should be
some balance and cooperation :-)
  

Definitely! Cut them some slack, we've all been there at one point or
other. 8-)



It's good that a newbie wants to help other newbies.  As for the quality of 
information, I've seen people who have several years of experience give 
advice that was true years ago but completely wrong now.  A newbie basing his 
information on what he learned as working for him will at least be up to 
date.


  
Anne, that's true too, but usually information and experience of newbie 
ever it is contemporary is not enough for resolve mid or high complexity 
problems. The only advantage will be for some very general notes and 
suggestions. And ever in this case the advise can be wrong or useless 
(as example - filesystems sizing)

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

2008-09-03 Thread Romeo Ninov



Sadaruwan Samaraweera  wrote / napísal(a):


Hi Good People,

 I've created a blog to help newbies in the world of Linux. 
Can you people see it and tell what departments that I've to improve 
more to help the grate community of Linux.


Thank you
--
Sadaruwan Samaraweera


Sounds interest, but
1. how do you think - is it appropriate to post in the list with 
subject: (no subject)


2. Where is the link of blog?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] A new blog on the block for Linux newbies

2008-09-03 Thread Romeo Ninov



Sadaruwan Samaraweera  wrote / napísal(a):

Hi Good People,

 I've created a blog to help newbies in the world of Linux. 
Can you people see it and tell what departments that I've to improve 
more to help the grate community of Linux.


Please click this link to go to my blog http://slinuxworld.blogspot.com/

Thank you
--
Sadaruwan Samaraweera

Looks interest, but it is only collection of links everyone can find 
using search engine. For ne one helpful blog should add some value to 
the community as personal articles, ever comments

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] GIMP 2.4 on CentOS 5?

2008-09-03 Thread Romeo Ninov



Niki Kovacs  wrote / napísal(a):

Hi,

I'm using CentOS 5 on all our desktops here (work  home), and I'm 
quite happy with it. There's one detail I'd like to change. GIMP comes 
in version 2.2. There have been some changes in version 2.4, and it's 
also been around for quite some time. There are quite some functions 
in 2.4 that I'd like to use. As far as I understand, building GIMP 2.4 
would involve some changes to [base] packages, like upgrading GTK.


Anyone built GIMP 2.4 successfully without wrecking the system? I 
guess I'd take an SRPM from FC8 from rpm.pbone.net, and then start 
from here. Only I prefer to ask first.


Cheers from the cloudy South of France,

Niki


Salut,
IMHO build from SRPM and install will be bigger problem (in sense of 
dependencies, etc) so i suggest to build in from source and install it 
in unstandard directory like /opt/gimp

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Proxy with no cache

2008-09-03 Thread Romeo Ninov


Sergio Belkin  wrote / napísal(a):

Hi,
I'd want to install a proxy server but  I no need cache, what software
do you recommend me?

thanks in advance!

  
Take a look on some socks server (dante). BTW i think squid can be 
configured as noncaching proxy

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] kickstart problems

2008-09-02 Thread Romeo Ninov



Paolo Supino  wrote / napísal(a):



On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:14 AM, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Paolo Supino wrote:
 Hi Nate


 3: After the error comes up I get the HTTP setup configuration
screen with
 the source website (in IP) and CentOS directory as I entered
them in the
 pxeconfiguration file and as it appears in the kickstart
configuration file
 and all I have to do is press the 'OK' button to continue the
installation
 to a successful completion.

If that's the case the next most likely culprit is

 url --url http://192.168.11.1/source


Just because the PXE boot loader can download the kickstart
config does not mean that the installation process will work
with that NIC.

Also I've had lots of broadcom systems not work with kickstart over
the years, it's not uncommon for newer systems to have newer
revs of the chipsets and those revs not being supported by the
installer.

But it sounds like in your case it does work, so I would look
at the url above, as it likely is the cause of the problem. Check
the http access logs on the server for 404s and similar errors.

nate

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



Hi Nate

  After figuring what I was doing wrong (see previous reply ...) I 
started going through each of my systems in order to boot them and 
install CentOS 5.2 on each. For the most part it works, but only for 
the most part? Because once in a few boots (not machine specific) 
anaconda stops and either asks me what interface it needs to configure 
or fails to load 'stage2.img' from the web server on 192.168.11.1 
http://192.168.11.1 ... All cables are good cables. The network 
switch is a Cisco 3750G with no configuration) and all the NICs are 
broadcom with firmware 3.8.9. http://3.8.9. Can you throw a guess 
where the problem might be lying (I hate inconsistencies)?




Have you check apache logs for something. Check also the server messages
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] kickstart problems

2008-09-02 Thread Romeo Ninov



Paolo Supino  wrote / napísal(a):



On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Romeo Ninov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




Paolo Supino  wrote / napísal(a):



On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:14 AM, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi Nate
   

3: After the error comes up I get the HTTP setup
configuration
   screen with
the source website (in IP) and CentOS directory as I entered
   them in the
pxeconfiguration file and as it appears in the kickstart
   configuration file
and all I have to do is press the 'OK' button to continue the
   installation
to a successful completion.

   If that's the case the next most likely culprit is

url --url http://192.168.11.1/source


   Just because the PXE boot loader can download the kickstart
   config does not mean that the installation process will work
   with that NIC.

   Also I've had lots of broadcom systems not work with
kickstart over
   the years, it's not uncommon for newer systems to have newer
   revs of the chipsets and those revs not being supported by the
   installer.

   But it sounds like in your case it does work, so I would look
   at the url above, as it likely is the cause of the problem.
Check
   the http access logs on the server for 404s and similar errors.

   nate

   ___
   CentOS mailing list
   CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org
mailto:CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org

   http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



Hi Nate

 After figuring what I was doing wrong (see previous reply
...) I started going through each of my systems in order to
boot them and install CentOS 5.2 on each. For the most part it
works, but only for the most part? Because once in a few boots
(not machine specific) anaconda stops and either asks me what
interface it needs to configure or fails to load 'stage2.img'
from the web server on 192.168.11.1 http://192.168.11.1
http://192.168.11.1 ... All cables are good cables. The
network switch is a Cisco 3750G with no configuration) and all
the NICs are broadcom with firmware 3.8.9. http://3.8.9.
http://3.8.9. Can you throw a guess where the problem might
be lying (I hate inconsistencies)?


Have you check apache logs for something. Check also the server
messages

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org mailto:CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Hi Romeo

  Yes I did, and nothing shows up in either access_log or error_log :-(
I just had a node that stopped asking me for IP configuration (twice) 
and only on the second time (checked on the server using tcpdump) did 
it actually try to contact the server to retrieve network 
configuration continue and it successfully retrieved 'stage2.img' from 
the web server :-(


Paolo, what about DHCP or bootp servers. Check the logs, flush ARP cache 
from server(s)

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] new software raid installs

2008-08-29 Thread Romeo Ninov

you should wait till full sync between 2 copies of the RAID

Jerry Geis  wrote / napísal(a):

I have noticed that when I do software raid installed (RAID1)
that I reboot and one of the first things it says is

md1 is not in sync doing background reconstruction...

md0 is my /root partition
md1 is my /home partition

why would md1 not be in sync after an install.

Jerry

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] problem with slave dns servers

2008-08-28 Thread Romeo Ninov
Have you describe all the slave servers in you domain configuration (in 
registrant)?


Mark Quitoriano  wrote / napísal(a):

Hi,

I have 4 bind9 dns installed on centos 4. My primary dns server went 
down and all of my domains doesn't resolve even if the 3 slave dns is 
up and running. Im not sure where to configure this is it in my domain 
registration or in bind?



--
Regards,
Mark Quitoriano
Blog | http://mark.quitoriano.org
VicidialNOW! | http://www.vicidialnow.com
APUG! | http://asterisk.org.ph



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] How to enable bind to listen querys from all my network

2008-08-28 Thread Romeo Ninov

Set bind to listen to IP, not network, for example 10.10.80.1, no 10.10.80.0

Miguel A. Velasco  wrote / napísal(a):

Hello all,

I´ve installed a proxy Squid in my gateway and a Cache DNS Server with
bind. The problem is the server is only resolving is own querys but not
the client queries from my company.
When I do:
$service named start
I see in /var/log/messages:

starting BIND 9.3.4-P1 -u named -t /var/named/chroot
found 1 CPU, using 1 worker thread
loading configuration from '/etc/named.conf'
listening on IPv6 interface lo, ::1#53
listening on IPv4 interface lo, 127.0.0.1#53
command channel listening on 127.0.0.1#953
command channel listening on ::1#953
zone 0.in-addr.arpa/IN/localhost_resolver: loaded serial 42
zone 0.0.127.in-addr.arpa/IN/localhost_resolver: loaded serial 1997022700
zone 255.in-addr.arpa/IN/localhost_resolver: loaded serial 42
zone
0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa/IN/localhost_resolver: 


loaded serial 1997022700
zone localdomain/IN/localhost_resolver: loaded serial 42
zone localhost/IN/localhost_resolver: loaded serial 42
running

I don´t understand why is only listening on IPv4 interface lo,
127.0.0.1#53
I have bind-chroot installed with the following options in 
/etc/named.conf:


options {
listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; 10.10.80.0; };
listen-on-v6 port 53 { ::1; };
directory   /var/named;
dump-file   /var/named/data/cache_dump.db;
statistics-file /var/named/data/named_stats.txt;
memstatistics-file /var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt;

// Those options should be used carefully because they disable 
port

// randomization
// query-sourceport 53;
// query-source-v6 port 53;

allow-query { localhost; };
};
logging {
channel default_debug {
file data/named.run;
severity dynamic;
};
};
view localhost_resolver {
match-clients  { localhost; };
match-destinations { localhost; };
recursion yes;
include /etc/named.rfc1912.zones;
};

Where 10.10.80.0 is my network range. What may I do my server really
listen for all my network? Nowadays it´s listenning just itself 

Thanks very much for your attention.
Miguel A. Velasco

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] How to enable bind to listen querys from all my network

2008-08-28 Thread Romeo Ninov
Set bind to listen to IP, not network, for example 10.10.80.1, no 
10.10.80.0


Miguel A. Velasco  wrote / napísal(a):

Hello all,

I´ve installed a proxy Squid in my gateway and a Cache DNS Server with
bind. The problem is the server is only resolving is own querys but not
the client queries from my company.
When I do:
$service named start
I see in /var/log/messages:

starting BIND 9.3.4-P1 -u named -t /var/named/chroot
found 1 CPU, using 1 worker thread
loading configuration from '/etc/named.conf'
listening on IPv6 interface lo, ::1#53
listening on IPv4 interface lo, 127.0.0.1#53
command channel listening on 127.0.0.1#953
command channel listening on ::1#953
zone 0.in-addr.arpa/IN/localhost_resolver: loaded serial 42
zone 0.0.127.in-addr.arpa/IN/localhost_resolver: loaded serial 1997022700
zone 255.in-addr.arpa/IN/localhost_resolver: loaded serial 42
zone
0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa/IN/localhost_resolver: 


loaded serial 1997022700
zone localdomain/IN/localhost_resolver: loaded serial 42
zone localhost/IN/localhost_resolver: loaded serial 42
running

I don´t understand why is only listening on IPv4 interface lo,
127.0.0.1#53
I have bind-chroot installed with the following options in 
/etc/named.conf:


options {
listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; 10.10.80.0; };
listen-on-v6 port 53 { ::1; };
directory   /var/named;
dump-file   /var/named/data/cache_dump.db;
statistics-file /var/named/data/named_stats.txt;
memstatistics-file /var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt;

// Those options should be used carefully because they disable 
port

// randomization
// query-sourceport 53;
// query-source-v6 port 53;

allow-query { localhost; };
};
logging {
channel default_debug {
file data/named.run;
severity dynamic;
};
};
view localhost_resolver {
match-clients  { localhost; };
match-destinations { localhost; };
recursion yes;
include /etc/named.rfc1912.zones;
};

Where 10.10.80.0 is my network range. What may I do my server really
listen for all my network? Nowadays it´s listenning just itself 

Thanks very much for your attention.
Miguel A. Velasco

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] problem with slave dns servers

2008-08-28 Thread Romeo Ninov

Depend how often you change DNS records, but normally 2-3 days IMHO is OK

Mark Quitoriano  wrote / napísal(a):

hmmm... yeah i think is et everything to 300 which is not good. What
is the recommended TTL settings? some sites recommend 4 days some 1
hour.


On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Michel van Deventer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Hi,

what is the TTL of your DNS records ? After TTL expires, the slaves
don't respond to queries either, because the records aren't valid
anymore. If your primary is down longer than the TTL of your DNS records
you could reconfigure one of the slaves as a new primary or maybe
consider making more than 1 primary.

On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 09:01 +0200, Romeo Ninov wrote:


Have you describe all the slave servers in you domain configuration (in
registrant)?

Mark Quitoriano  wrote / napísal(a):
  

Hi,

I have 4 bind9 dns installed on centos 4. My primary dns server went
down and all of my domains doesn't resolve even if the 3 slave dns is
up and running. Im not sure where to configure this is it in my domain
registration or in bind?


--


   Regards,

   Michel


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos





--
Regards,
Mark Quitoriano
Blog | http://mark.quitoriano.org
VicidialNOW! | http://www.vicidialnow.com
APUG! | http://asterisk.org.ph
  



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] How to enable bind to listen querys from all my network

2008-08-28 Thread Romeo Ninov
But do you have this IP on your machine? You should set IP from your 
machine, not IP in general!!!


Miguel A. Velasco  wrote / napísal(a):

Romeo Ninov escribió:
Set bind to listen to IP, not network, for example 10.10.80.1, no 
10.10.80.0

Thanks Romeo, I´ve also tried it but doen´t work.
Miguel A. Velasco



Miguel A. Velasco  wrote / napísal(a):

Hello all,

I´ve installed a proxy Squid in my gateway and a Cache DNS Server with
bind. The problem is the server is only resolving is own querys but not
the client queries from my company.
When I do:
$service named start
I see in /var/log/messages:

starting BIND 9.3.4-P1 -u named -t /var/named/chroot
found 1 CPU, using 1 worker thread
loading configuration from '/etc/named.conf'
listening on IPv6 interface lo, ::1#53
listening on IPv4 interface lo, 127.0.0.1#53
command channel listening on 127.0.0.1#953
command channel listening on ::1#953
zone 0.in-addr.arpa/IN/localhost_resolver: loaded serial 42
zone 0.0.127.in-addr.arpa/IN/localhost_resolver: loaded serial 
1997022700

zone 255.in-addr.arpa/IN/localhost_resolver: loaded serial 42
zone
0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa/IN/localhost_resolver: 


loaded serial 1997022700
zone localdomain/IN/localhost_resolver: loaded serial 42
zone localhost/IN/localhost_resolver: loaded serial 42
running

I don´t understand why is only listening on IPv4 interface lo,
127.0.0.1#53
I have bind-chroot installed with the following options in 
/etc/named.conf:


options {
listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; 10.10.80.0; };
listen-on-v6 port 53 { ::1; };
directory   /var/named;
dump-file   /var/named/data/cache_dump.db;
statistics-file /var/named/data/named_stats.txt;
memstatistics-file /var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt;

// Those options should be used carefully because they 
disable port

// randomization
// query-sourceport 53;
// query-source-v6 port 53;

allow-query { localhost; };
};
logging {
channel default_debug {
file data/named.run;
severity dynamic;
};
};
view localhost_resolver {
match-clients  { localhost; };
match-destinations { localhost; };
recursion yes;
include /etc/named.rfc1912.zones;
};

Where 10.10.80.0 is my network range. What may I do my server really
listen for all my network? Nowadays it´s listenning just itself 

Thanks very much for your attention.
Miguel A. Velasco

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

2008-08-26 Thread Romeo Ninov

Do you have installed kernel-devel package?

Ian jonhson  wrote / napísal(a):

I have downloaded the src.rpm according the wiki instructions.
however, when I executed

$ rpm -i kernel-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5.src.rpm

I got a lot of warnings and after the following command:

$ rpmbuild -bp --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2 prep-err.log |
tee prep-out.log

No files are created in BUILD directory. The prep-err.log said:

error: Failed build dependencies:
unifdef is needed by kernel-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5.x86_64

My hardware is a 64bit machine. Are there something different in kernel version
32 and 64? or, something I miss?


Thanks again,

Ian


On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Ian jonhson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi,

My jobs need to recompile the kernel codes, but I don't know
how to yum the kernel source codes.

Any help?
  

First look in http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/I_need_the_Kernel_Source

and then http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

2008-08-26 Thread Romeo Ninov

What about kernel-headers

Ian jonhson  wrote / napísal(a):

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Romeo Ninov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Do you have installed kernel-devel package?




Sure. but the problem is still there.


Any help?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos