Re: [CentOS] Centos6.5 Intel Corporation Centrino Advanced-N 6235 not working
On 10/12/13 07:02, Johan Vermeulen wrote: [root@jvermeulen ~]# dmesg | grep iwlwifi iwlwifi :03:00.0: PCI INT A - GSI 17 (level, low) - IRQ 17 iwlwifi :03:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 iwlwifi :03:00.0: irq 32 for MSI/MSI-X iwlwifi :03:00.0: firmware: requesting iwlwifi-6000g2b-6.ucode iwlwifi :03:00.0: request for firmware file 'iwlwifi-6000g2b-6.ucode' failed. iwlwifi :03:00.0: no suitable firmware found! iwlwifi :03:00.0: PCI INT A disabled $ rpm -qf /lib/firmware/iwlwifi-6000g2b-6.ucode kernel-firmware-2.6.32-431.el6.noarch Did you verify that the firmware file is available? -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Help with VMware ESXi manager for CentOS - newbie level
On 10/09/13 18:52, John R Pierce wrote: On 9/10/2013 2:15 AM, Tom G. Christensen wrote: and has initscripts in /etc/init.d reminiscent of RHEL /etc/init.d is from ATT Unix System V I'm well aware of that, but I fail to see how it is relevant in this context since I doubt that is where VMware looked for inspiration. -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Help with VMware ESXi manager for CentOS - newbie level
On 06/09/13 19:33, John R Pierce wrote: On 9/6/2013 1:49 AM, Tom G. Christensen wrote: ESXi has a very limited unix userland environment which may or may not be based on RHEL. It's not really meant for general use and I have no experience with it. its not. from what all I've been able to tell, its a custom shell running in a BSD like environment. there's no linux kernel in there at all. I never said anything about a Linux kernel, I said userland based on RHEL. I had a look at it now and while it might not be based on RHEL sources it looks like it was built on an RHEL 5 host, judging by the python banner which says it was built with [GCC version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-50] Most of the standard unix commands are provided by busybox. But it seems to be using glibc and has initscripts in /etc/init.d reminiscent of RHEL, there's even a chkconfig to enable/disable services, no runlevels though. The filesystem layout is much like RHEL and it seems to definitely be a Linux userland so IMHO not very BSD like at all. -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Help with VMware ESXi manager for CentOS - newbie level
On 05/09/13 18:14, Scott Robbins wrote: On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 11:04:51AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:46 AM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: And yes, I'm well aware that ESXi is a modified version of, mmm, is it still RHEL 3, or have they gone up yet? The linux components were just for the shell-level interaction and I think they are mostly gone now. In any case, they don't have security updates nearly as often as RHEL/Centos pushes a new kernel which is an advantage for uptime on the guests. If I remember correctly (but I'm no longer at that job, so don't have access to double check) around VMware 4.x or 5.x it no longer had a Linux shell. Although there are still some commands that work, I _think_ that it's now a very stripped down shell, as opposed to 3.5 which had all the commands available in a Linux shell. So, if I am correct, then Les has summed it up nicely. The Service Console was removed in the move from ESX to ESXi, so ESX 4.1 and lower has a Service Console based on RHEL (el5 for ESX 4.x, el3 for ESX 3.x). ESXi has a very limited unix userland environment which may or may not be based on RHEL. It's not really meant for general use and I have no experience with it. I prefer to use either the client or the webadministration (vCenter), alternatively I use the vSphere Manager Appliance for remote cli access using esxcli or vi-cfg, and sometimes I'll toy around with PowerCLI in a Windows VM. -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] looking for a decent free / Open Source flash media server
Rudi Ahlers wrote: Does anyone have any suggestions for me? http://www.wowzamedia.com/index.html -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Adding Repositories and using yum to download packages
Jatin Davey wrote: Hi I am using CentOS 5.3 and after installing the OS i scrolled to the /etc/yum.repos.d directory and i could not find any repositories being present there. So i googled a bit on adding the repositories and found the link: That sounds very much like you've actually installed RHEL and not CentOS. You can look at /etc/redhat-release to see what you've actually installed. -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 3.8+Wine
TeeWei Hian wrote: Can wine install in CentOS 3.8? Yes. snip [r...@gloin yum.repos.d]# rpm -ivh /home/wine/* warning: /home/wine/wine-1.0.1-1.el5.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, You're trying to install el5 packages on el3 which is never going to work. You can get wine for el3 from rpmforge: http://packages.sw.be/wine/ snip -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL, centos and seeing if i now understand this
Robert P. J. Day wrote: the issue was not what support was available from *redhat*, it was trying to clarify what was available from the *centos* community. but thanks for playing. It simple really, you want guaranteed support that gets your problems solved you pay for RHEL. If you want to do it on the cheap then you run CentOS and get support from a random bunch of people on a maillist where half of the participants haven't got a clue and hope to not piss of the people who do. I'll give you a hint though, consultants selling CentOS solutions and expecting the list to provide commercial grade support for them will tend to piss people off. -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Many missing updates for CentOS 4?
According to centos-announce there's been no updates for CentOS 4 i386/x86_64 since the seamonkey errata (CESA-2009:0325) on 2009-03-06. A quick rundown shows a rather worrying backlog of missing security updates, some more than a month old: 2009:0313 - Moderate: wireshark 2009:0333 - Moderate: libpng/libpng10 2009:0331 - Important: kernel 2009:0344 - Moderate: libsoup 2009:0354 - Moderate: evolution-data-server 2009:0355 - Moderate: evolution and evolution-data-server 2009:0341 - Moderate: curl 2009:0345 - Moderate: ghostscript (superceded by 2009:0420) 2009:0258 - Moderate: thunderbird 2009:0362 - Moderate: NetworkManager 2009:0373 - Moderate: systemtap 2009:0397 - Critical: firefox 2009:0398 - Critical: seamonkey 2009:0337 - Moderate: php 2009:0409 - Important: krb5 2009:0411 - Moderate: device-mapper-multipath 2009:0420 - Moderate: ghostscript Is there any work being done on these? -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: looking for stunnel configuration file for /etc/xinetd.d/
Rudi Ahlers wrote: Hi all Does anyone have a config file for stunnel, to work with /etc/xinetd.d? I use the following setup to allow normal IMAP access to an Exchange system that only speaks IMAP+TLS/SSL. /etc/xinetd.d/exhange-imaps: # Redirect IMAP on port 143 using stunnel service exchange { type= UNLISTED port= 143 socket_type = stream wait= no user= root protocol= tcp server = /usr/sbin/stunnel server_args = /etc/stunnel/exchange-imaps.conf log_on_success += USERID log_on_failure += USERID } /etc/stunnel/exchange-imaps.conf: client = yes connect = imap.example.com:993 -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Thunderbird does not follow url links in Firefox
Theo Band wrote: Since the recent update from firefox2 to firefox3 the links in my mails do no longer work. No window pops up. After some debug I found the problem. Let's share it with others that experience the same problem: Thank you for tracking this down. Your suggested fix also works fine with a custom el4 build of thunderbird 2.0.0.17. -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: CentOS on a Sunfire 880
John R Pierce wrote: Solaris 7 (2.7, sunos 5.7) is way past end of service life, and 8 is nearly there. 9 is nearing the end. Let's stick to the facts: http://www.sun.com/service/eosl/solaris/solaris_vintage_eol_5.2005.xml Solaris 7 reached its EOSL just last month. Solaris 8 won't reach it for another 3½ years! Solaris 9 hasn't even stopped shipping yet so it's not nearing the end in any way. -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Problem of sort utf8 file.
Peter Cai wrote: PS: the background of this problem is that Postgresql's order by command depends on the sort result of the OS. AFAIK PostgreSQL will determine its own locale from the system locale when it's initdb'ed for the first time, that locale will then be used for all databases even if you later change the system locale. Perhaps you need to dump your databases and do a new initdb with the proper locale set before this starts working the way you want. -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: finding older rpms
Rogelio wrote: I'm on a fairly old RHEL box, when I cat /proc/version, I get the following: Linux version 2.4.21-4.ELsmp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-20)) This is RHEL3 GA, released Oct 23, 2003. At this stage, I guess I don't have 'yum', so where exactly do I get the individual RPMs? Using up2date ofcourse, or simple logging into your RHN account at redhat. If you don't have a working RHN subscription for that host then you won't get any updates as they are not available anywhere outside of Redhat. If you can't get any updates then I would strongly recommend you reinstall with CentOS. -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: apt on Centos 5.1
Scott Silva wrote: snip And I would assume that apt won't be able to update from the CentOS repos. Your assumption is wrong. As Dag explained on his blog modern apt-rpm supports repomd format and can use the same repositories as yum. -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: DMA mode
David Mackintosh wrote: On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 10:17:14AM +0200, Tom G. Christensen wrote: Google suggests booting with ide0=noprobe ide1=noprobe to make sure the ata-piix driver is used. If you don't want to reinstall then make sure initrd contains the ata-piix driver and that references to /dev/hd* are replaced with /dev/sd* in fstab etc. Hi Tom, I can also confirm that this works, thank you for the assistance. Can I ask what you used as your google query? I think I missed something obvious. Well I don't remember the exact query I did however I just now searched for DL140 Linux SATA and the third hit is to a thread on the HP ITRC forums with the suggested fix. -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Network problems on new CentOS 5 install on P35, ICH9R mobo
Juan C. Valido wrote: On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 23:49 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: Dick Roth wrote: Juan C. Valido wrote: On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 06:09 -0400, Dick Roth wrote: Had to replace dying cpu and mobo, so also replaced IDE with new SATA drive. Installed from latest ISO onto SATA and can't get networking to lease an IP address from my ISP (Comcast). The network utility always comes up with a private address (192.168.0.2) instead of Comcast IP. To add to confusion, if I boot into old IDE drive, I get proper network connection to internet, but lose my swap! Particulars: mobo=Gigabyte P35-DS3R SATA Controller=AHCI PATA Controller=JMicron 20360 new drive=ATA WDC WD1600AAJS-2 old drive=WDC WD400JB-00JJA0 DVD-RW=Pioneer DVR-112D (PATA) NICs=eth0=Realtek RTL-8029(AS) (DHCP) eth1=Realtek RTL-8029(AS) (Static) Has anyone seen this? Will 5.2 help with this situation? Been working on this for days! If it helps any, I tried installing 5,1 on a P35-DS3L and I believe I had issues with the network card, loaded RHEL 5.2 desktop and everything worked so maybe 5.2 will work for you. Thanks for the info, Juan. I'll just hold tight until 5.2 comes down the pike. Dick Release notes list the following Realtek drivers added, but I don't see yours mentions: http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.2/html/Release_Notes/x86/ar01s01.html Network driver r8169 updated to add support for the following devices: RTL8169sb/8110sb RTL8169sc/8110sc RTL8168b/8111b RTL8101e RTL8100e I don't know maybe it's not listed but it's compatible, I know that it works. Same thing with OSX86, it works GRIN Updating the r8169 driver will not solve a driver issue with the RTL8029 chip. The RTL8029 is an old NE2000 clone chip (must be atleast 10 years old by now). It was common on cheap 10Mbit PCI cards and is supported by the ne2k-pci driver for many years (and the plain ne2k driver before PCI support was split out). -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: DMA mode
David Mackintosh wrote: Hi folks, I have an HP Proliant 140DL G2 server with what appears to be an IDE drive in non-DMA mode. Performance on the server is extremely bad when large amounts of disk activity is taking place. I think the problem is that my drive is not in DMA mode: # hdparm /dev/hda This should be /dev/sda and not /dev/hda which means you're most likely using the generic-ide driver and not ata-piix. Google suggests booting with ide0=noprobe ide1=noprobe to make sure the ata-piix driver is used. If you don't want to reinstall then make sure initrd contains the ata-piix driver and that references to /dev/hd* are replaced with /dev/sd* in fstab etc. -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: PHP 5.2.5 when ?
Mark Weaver wrote: Santa Claus wrote: Hi Thanks to all who responded. But I repeat the question: how to upgrade CentOS4 to PHP 5.2.5 correctly? 1. download form php.net http://php.net + make ... etc. 2. or go search rpms/rpm in private repositories ? you can get what you want with this repo info: [dag] name=Dag RPM Repository for *Red Hat Enterprise Linux* baseurl=http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el$releasever/en/$basearch/dag gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 dag/rpmforge does *NOT* provide php 5.2.x. For php 5.2.x on CentOS 4 and 5 I would recommend the Les RPM de Remi repository at http://remi.collet.free.fr/index.php It contains only the bits necessary for php 5.2.x and it's the least intrusive repository for php 5.2.5 on CentOS 4 and 5 that I've found. -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: ivtv
Jason Pyeron wrote: I have this old memory that the kernels used are a hodge podge of backports etc. So for a kernel-smp-2.6.9-55.0.9.EL should I use 0.4.10? Quoted from http://ivtvdriver.org/index.php/Download: The latest stable releases can be found here. Currently this is version 0.4.10 for kernels = 2.6.15, version 0.6.7 for kernel 2.6.16, version 0.7.4 for kernel 2.6.17, version 0.10.6 for kernels = 2.6.18 and = 2.6.21.x and version 1.0.3 for kernels = 2.6.22 and = 2.6.23. 0.4.10 works well on CentOS 4. I have 12 hosts with this config each with 3 Hauppauge PVR-350 cards. I record both TV and radio. Ps, anyone have any sugestion about dkms and ivtv? Yes, use ivtv kmdls from atrpms instead. Just remember to put an includepkgs into the repo file to avoid getting the full atrpms experience (it upgrades lots of system stuff). Something like this will get you started: $ cat atrpms.repo [atrpms] name=Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 - i386 - ATrpms baseurl=http://dl.atrpms.net/el4-i386/atrpms/stable failovermethod=priority enabled=1 priority=10 includepkg=ivtv perl-Video-ivtv perl-Video-Frequencies ivtv-kmdl yum-plugin-kmdl ivtv-firmware Start by installing the yum-plugin-kmdl package to make yum properly handle installing/removing kmdls matching the kernels installed. -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos