Re: [CentOS] forcing yum to download but not install
You can use the yum download-only plugin, or you can enable a keep cache variable in your /etc/yum.repos.d/yourfile.repo. Don't remember the syntax off the top of my head. However a quick google search should turn them both up. Other option if you want to sync a repo you can check out an application called cobbler. On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote: Hey folks, Is there any way to fake a yum update just to get yum to force a download of all the files it needs, without actually installing them. I finally have a RPM cache/proxy working and I just want to populate it. The server I want to actually update cannot be updated until tomorrow but I'd like to do a fake update just to force the RPMs into my cache so they will all be pre-downloaded. I don't see anyway from the man page to do this. thanks, -Alan -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] forcing yum to download but not install
Oh but keep in mind if you enable keep cache in your repo file it will still install them, just it will keep a copy as well. Keep that in mind. On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:42 AM, cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote: You can use the yum download-only plugin, or you can enable a keep cache variable in your /etc/yum.repos.d/yourfile.repo. Don't remember the syntax off the top of my head. However a quick google search should turn them both up. Other option if you want to sync a repo you can check out an application called cobbler. On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote: Hey folks, Is there any way to fake a yum update just to get yum to force a download of all the files it needs, without actually installing them. I finally have a RPM cache/proxy working and I just want to populate it. The server I want to actually update cannot be updated until tomorrow but I'd like to do a fake update just to force the RPMs into my cache so they will all be pre-downloaded. I don't see anyway from the man page to do this. thanks, -Alan -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] forcing yum to download but not install
Which is why you should use cobbler because it does all that for you. On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Ryan Wagoner rswago...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote: Hey folks, Is there any way to fake a yum update just to get yum to force a download of all the files it needs, without actually installing them. I finally have a RPM cache/proxy working and I just want to populate it. The server I want to actually update cannot be updated until tomorrow but I'd like to do a fake update just to force the RPMs into my cache so they will all be pre-downloaded. I don't see anyway from the man page to do this. thanks, -Alan Why not just mirror the CentOS repo with rsync? You can have a script rsync nightly so updates are ready to install when you need them. Additionally your repo will be consistent with CentOS. If you use a proxy you could have inconsistent results depending on the cache time to live. Ryan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] forcing yum to download but not install
Alan, if your worried about keeping an up to date repository locally and consistently, then yes cobbler is the way to go. If all you want to do is an update and save off the RPMS once.. then use the yum download only plugin. On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:02 PM, cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote: Which is why you should use cobbler because it does all that for you. I actually just installed cobbler a few weeks ago and will look into it for this to see if it has a way to grab a repository without rsync -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] forcing yum to download but not install
I would highly advise against trying to time a CTRL-C in a specific amount of time. Not sure why you would even try and do that when, that's the exact purpose of the yum-download only which is easier to install and run then wait for a whole update to complete and try and manually kill the job. Sorry but that idea is just bad. On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rswrote: Vreme: 12/19/2011 05:39 PM, Alan McKay piše: Hey folks, Is there any way to fake a yum update just to get yum to force a download of all the files it needs, without actually installing them. I finally have a RPM cache/proxy working and I just want to populate it. The server I want to actually update cannot be updated until tomorrow but I'd like to do a fake update just to force the RPMs into my cache so they will all be pre-downloaded. I don't see anyway from the man page to do this. thanks, -Alan Let me let you on little secret. It seams nobody thought about it. run yum update and wait until it downloads last package. then when it starts Transaction check just abort it with Ctrl+C. That will download all packages you need but will not install them. The next time you run update it will show them bold. At this point you can even copy /var/cache/yum to be safe, but it should keep the packages until yum clean all or finish of yum update. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6 gateway/firewall problem
Can you fpaste your firewall rules? I would omit the actual public IP's for security sake. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck l.wandreb...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I'm using system-config-firewall (C6 x86_64, fully up to date) to configure a gateway/firewall box. 2 nics, eth0 (configured as bridge0, mtu 7200) connected to the lan, eth1 being connected directly to the internet (public ip, mtu 1500). ssh port is open and accessible. nat is working fine. I've put bridge0 as a trusted interface, eth1 is masqueraded. I've put ports 20,21,80 as forwarded ports on eth1 to lan machines. Thing is nmap (and classical ways to access these protocols) say it's closed. I've tried to make 20,21,80 open and forwarded, to no avail. Could someone give me a hand ? Thanks, Laurent. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6 gateway/firewall problem
actually if you could cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables, i find it easier to read. also try this to troubleshoot watch n 1 'iptables -t nat -L -n -v' it will show you the when a packet hits a rule I find it very helpful when troubleshooting. But if not mistake about what your intent is your forwarding rules that you have in prerouting should be in INPUT chain. You're trying to come in from an outside net to your FW and be forwarded to what you have NAT'd behind it right? On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck l.wandreb...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:44:11 -0500 cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote: Can you fpaste your firewall rules? I would omit the actual public IP's for security sake. http://fpaste.org/wE0L/ If you need anything else, ask :) Thanks, Laurent. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6 gateway/firewall problem
sorry that's watch -n 1 'iptables -t nat -L -n -v' On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:04 AM, cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote: actually if you could cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables, i find it easier to read. also try this to troubleshoot watch n 1 'iptables -t nat -L -n -v' it will show you the when a packet hits a rule I find it very helpful when troubleshooting. But if not mistake about what your intent is your forwarding rules that you have in prerouting should be in INPUT chain. You're trying to come in from an outside net to your FW and be forwarded to what you have NAT'd behind it right? On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck l.wandreb...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:44:11 -0500 cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote: Can you fpaste your firewall rules? I would omit the actual public IP's for security sake. http://fpaste.org/wE0L/ If you need anything else, ask :) Thanks, Laurent. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6 gateway/firewall problem
My best guess would be to move your forwarding rules to the INPUT chain instead of being in the PREROUTING. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck l.wandreb...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:07:41 -0500 cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote: sorry that's watch -n 1 'iptables -t nat -L -n -v' snip But if not mistake about what your intent is your forwarding rules that you have in prerouting should be in INPUT chain. You're trying to come in from an outside net to your FW and be forwarded to what you have NAT'd behind it right? absolutely. I've updated fpaste with /etc/sysconfig/iptables Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6 gateway/firewall problem
Also to note, if you edit your /etc/sysconfig/iptables file manually there is a line in /etc/init.d./iptables at line number 300 that will save on service iptables restart; meaning if you run that command the buffer will save over the file and basically revert any changes you just made to the file. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:05 AM, cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote: Here's a really good overview of how the iptables process works http://fedoraunity.org/Members/kanarip/iptables-howto On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:53 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:23:45 -0500 cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote: My best guess would be to move your forwarding rules to the INPUT chain instead of being in the PREROUTING. Will try that once I figure out iptables syntax. Is it me or I hit a system-config-firewall bug in rules generation ? These days, I either edit /etc/sysconfig/iptables or iptables-save iptables. Take one, clone it, edit the line. -s source, -d destination, -p protocol covers most of it, along with -j ACCEPT or -j DROP. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6 gateway/firewall problem
Here's a really good overview of how the iptables process works http://fedoraunity.org/Members/kanarip/iptables-howto On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:53 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:23:45 -0500 cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote: My best guess would be to move your forwarding rules to the INPUT chain instead of being in the PREROUTING. Will try that once I figure out iptables syntax. Is it me or I hit a system-config-firewall bug in rules generation ? These days, I either edit /etc/sysconfig/iptables or iptables-save iptables. Take one, clone it, edit the line. -s source, -d destination, -p protocol covers most of it, along with -j ACCEPT or -j DROP. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6 gateway/firewall problem
@John, yea good catch thanks =) On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:59 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.ukwrote: On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, cliff here wrote: Also to note, if you edit your /etc/sysconfig/iptables file manually there is a line in /etc/init.d./iptables at line number 300 that will save on service iptables restart; meaning if you run that command the buffer will save over the file and basically revert any changes you just made to the file. Well, it's line 300 on CentOS 5, not on CentOS 6. If you mean that having IPTABLES_SAVE_ON_STOP=yes set means it saves on restart, well yes. But that's not the default, so you've changed your setup to do that as far as I'm aware. jh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SSH keys question
You should check the perms on the dirs, ssh will not allow it use the keys if they are too permissive. So I would check starting at /home On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:29 PM, John Kennedy skeb...@gmail.com wrote: All, I have 3 servers. All 3 are CentOS 5.5. All 3 have identical /etc/ssh/sshd_config files. I used ssh-keygen (with no arguments) to generate keys with no password. I then added all 3 id_rsa.pub keys to the authorized_keys file. With this set up, I should be able to ssh between all 3 boxes without needing a password. The problem is that one of the servers keeps asking for a password even with the keys set up. servera -- serverb No password serverb -- servera No password servera -- serverc Password serverc -- servera No password serverb -- serverc Password serverc -- serverb No password If they are all identical from an ssh standpoint (at least the authorized_keys, /etc/sshd_config, and UID for the user on all 3 hosts), why will serverc not play nicely with the other 2 Is there something else I should be checking? Thanks, John -- John Kennedy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SSH keys question
I do believe the perms need to be at 700 for the ./ssh dir and 640 for the actual key files contained. On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com wrote: On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, cliff here wrote: You should check the perms on the dirs, ssh will not allow it use the keys if they are too permissive. So I would check starting at /home This is the most likely cause; I'd check there too. If not, 1. Ensure the file hash is the same (e.g., no extraneous whitespace in the middle of the key) 2. sshd is usually pretty good about writing errors to syslog. -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com http://www.madboa.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] e2fsck with millions of files
Yep, same answer here, I had RHEL4.8 on a 2.6 TB MSA, and you just leave it going over the weekend. On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:14:23AM -0500, Sean Carolan wrote: I have a large (1.5TB) partition with millions of files on it. e2fsck has been running nearly 12 hours and is still on Checking directory structure. Any tips for speeding this along? Yes -- use ext4. Otherwise, it's inevitable. -- Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org http://mattdm.org/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] JBD: failed to read block at offset
Im getting errors like JBD: failed to read block at offset 4360 on a raid 5 parition , have run several fcsk on it are these Journal errors recoverable? I've done a physical scan of the hard disks with HP insight manager as well -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DNS or firewall problem
Well if you want the kernel to route IPV4 traffic, then yes it has to be 1 On 7/6/10, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote: cliff here wrote: net.ipv4.conf.ip_forward = 0 ?? change to = 1 ?? yea that needs to be a 1 That cannot be mandatory, as I have a 0 there and do not have the OP's problem. As I mentioned, the default in shorewall is that loc to $FW, ie connection from machines on the local LAN to server, is set to REJECT. Maybe that is the default in the iptables setting too? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DNS or firewall problem
yea that needs to be a 1 On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Thomas Dukes tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Cliff Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 8:05 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] DNS or firewall problem Do u have ipv4 forwarding on in your /etc/syscttl Sent from my iPhone Uhhh, in /etc/sysctl.conf, net.ipv4.conf.ip_forward = 0 ?? change to = 1 ?? --Eddie On Jul 5, 2010, at 7:00 PM, Thomas Dukes tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote: Been working this for over a month now and I'm stumped. Everything was working until the 'crash'. Backup was no good so I did a fresh install of centos 5.5. Trying to get things back like they were but its been a really long time since I had to set things up from scratch, Redhat 2.0. My centos server acts as a gateway/firewall/router for my home network. Internal machines can access the internet. The server can access the internet. I can access my server/services from outside the local network but internal machines cannot. Any ideas/suggestions? Thanks, --Eddie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Can't install Centos with DVD on KVM.
Subject line explains most of it I'm trying to install Centos from a dvd iso, that has been verified on KVM (Fedora 13) box. Virtual machine boots, and will launch anaconda and will test the media, but on the next step after that it says it can't find CD media. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can't install Centos with DVD on KVM.
still stumped. On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:51 AM, cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote: Subject line explains most of it I'm trying to install Centos from a dvd iso, that has been verified on KVM (Fedora 13) box. Virtual machine boots, and will launch anaconda and will test the media, but on the next step after that it says it can't find CD media. -- - NOTICE: This message, including all attachments, is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to its intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying Received in error and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
