Re: [CentOS] Re: DRBD 8.2 crashes CentOS 5.2 on rsync from remote host
What server are? IBM, HP, DELL? 2008/8/18 Toshaan Bharvani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Scott Silva wrote: >> on 8-14-2008 12:55 AM Chris Miller spake the following: >>> nate wrote: Chris Miller wrote: > I've got a pair of HA servers I'm trying to get into production. > Here are some specs : > [..] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at > virtual address c This typically means bad RAM >>> >>> While I won't rule this out, my local hardware vendor does a 48 hour >>> burn-in including a full gamut of tests (including memory) before >>> handing over the servers. These servers are less than two weeks old... >>> >>> Seems like this is a common type of error in some situations. I tried >>> to boot in kexec/kdump mode (CentOS 5 replacement for diskdumputils), >>> but the e1000 driver isn't seeing the NICs after a reboot via the >>> "capture kernel", so I can't replicate the (rsync induced) problem >>> and perform kernel debugging. I'll explore this more tomorrow. >>> >>> Chris >> When the servers are shipped to you, do you open them and make sure >> all modules are seated completely, and haven't been dislodged by the >> shipping? >> >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > why not try a memtest, you can download a bootable cd/usb and do a check > > > > Get news, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Check it > out! > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: ****[CentOS] Fetchmail pop server and clean spam messages
But i want to leave clean messages on the server 2008/8/2 Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 20:55 +0200, nightduke wrote: >> Hi i want to fetchmail from a pop server and check every email to any >> rbl spamhaus,spamcop,etc and if match at any rbl the email will be >> deleted. >> >> It's possible to do this? > > sure... > > fetchmail => smtp server > > smtp server configured with MailScanner > > MailScanner 'tags' e-mail > > procmail or sieve identifies tags and deletes tagged e-mail (procmail or > sieve choice determined by your choice of IMAP server - > cyrus-imapd/sieve, dovecot/procmail, dovecot/sieve) > > Craig > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Fetchmail pop server and clean spam messages
Hi i want to fetchmail from a pop server and check every email to any rbl spamhaus,spamcop,etc and if match at any rbl the email will be deleted. It's possible to do this? Thanks Nightduke ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] fetchmail from a server and delete spam messages
Hi i have an old account on a pop3 server... i don't use for a long time...but i want to receive the emails from there sometimes... but i have a problem...this email has a lot of spam emails... I wish to know if there's a way to check all the emails and those emails that match at spamhaus or spamcop will be deleted... Anyone know f this can be done? Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Ideas for stopping ssh brute force attacks
Visit offical site to grab latest OpenSSH 5.1 2008/7/23 Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Florin Andrei wrote: >> Bowie Bailey wrote: >> > >> > I know it's "security through obscurity" >> >> That's not necessarily a bad thing. >> >> It is bad if it's the _only_ protection. > > Right. I was just trying to head off the inevitable objections. > > Not that it worked... :) > > -- > Bowie > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] recommendations for copying large filesystems
stops sync? 2008/6/22 Raja Subramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Now that I know the details - I don' think this is going to work. Not with >> 100 TB of data. It kind-of-works with 1 TB. >> Can anybody comment on the feasibility of rsync on 1 million files? > > rsync always broke on my filesystems with 200-300k files > due to out of memory errors (my box had 2GB RAM). > > - Raja > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] backup question
http://www.rsnapshot.org/ 2008/6/22 Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sunday 22 June 2008 09:37:38 admin wrote: >> I've had good results using Clonezilla for complete backup of OS+data. > > Is there any compression? Does it span multiple CDs if necessary? > > Anne > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] recommendations for copying large filesystems
Can add fiber network card to each server? fiber switch? if not try to plugin to each server giga ethernet card put a crossover cable and start rsync... i did that with 1tb of photos and takes a lot of timekeep power supply working and cross the fingers I hope this can help 2008/6/21 John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Mag Gam wrote: >> >> Network is a 10/100 >> 1 million large files >> No SAN, JBOD > > assuming 100baseT wire speed of about 10Mbyte/sec, moving 100TB will take a > minimum of 100TB/10MB/s = 10,000,000 seconds or 2900 hours, or about 4 > months. even on a gigE network, this would still take about 2 weeks or > more. > > > > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?
I prefer raid level of ibm For Dell you can find more info about raid level at http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/storage/RAID/RAIDbk0.pdf But add hot spare disks Nightduke 2008/5/22, Warren Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > > > So, how does it perform with 6 discs for example? Say I have 3 HDD's in > RAID-0, and another 3 in RAID-0, then RAID-1 the 2 RAID-0 stripes. > > > > There's actually two kinds of RAID-10. Some like to say RAID-01 or RAID-1+0 > or things like that to distinguish them. It's a matter of whether it's > mirrors over stripes or stripes over mirrors. You're talking about mirrors > over stripes, but I'm talking about doing it the other way around. > > Your way has the advantage of letting you add disks in pairs, but to get > that you get only single-disk redundancy: if a second disk goes out, your > array is gone, no matter which disk it is. > > If you do it the other way, you have to use groups of 4 (two mirrors striped > together) but you get the advantage that with a single disk missing, you can > lose another if it's in the other mirror. Of course, if you lose two in the > same mirror, you're toast. > > > And what would you recommend on 8 / 10 HDD's? > > > > As I said, usually RAID-5 or -6 usually makes more sense with so many > spindles. If you're talking RAID-10 (my way) with so many disks, it starts > getting expensive with 8, 12, etc. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
