Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.7 i386 and x86_64

2011-09-15 Thread WBEL-User03
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:41:22 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
===
 Thank you for all the hard dedicated work.
===
 I am echoing Always Learning's appreciation.  Thank you, Karanbir,
and all the other developers, QA personnel  repository/infrastructure
maintainers for getting 5.7 released.
 I'd like to contribute financially, to assist CentOS in this work.
But it appears your cash donation policy is still under review[1].  Any
idea when that will be complete?

[1]http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=23


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk5yOAAACgkQckGmqURqb5PvpQCeMOz7uAag8L9zzL31UIQbmHn+
3h4AoITeWv7hT3HHgPMouS+8V0+lG2TR
=pJk7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.7 i386 and x86_64

2011-09-14 Thread Keith Roberts
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote:

 To: centos@centos.org
 From: Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.7 i386 and x86_64
 
 On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 00:33 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:

 We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.7 for
 i386 and x86_64 Architectures.

 Thank you for all the hard dedicated work.

+1 Yes.

Keith

-
Websites:
http://www.karsites.net
http://www.php-debuggers.net
http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk

All email addresses are challenge-response protected with
TMDA [http://tmda.net]
-
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.7 i386 and x86_64

2011-09-14 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 09/14/2011 06:59 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
 Yes, I did notice that, just wondered why.  It seems more prone to breakage 
 (creating multiple symlinks vs one)

There are a couple of reasons. I wont go into all, but the 2 that stick
out the most for me are:

1) symlinking a step deeper means we can have more finer grained control
over the content exported from the release/ and the release/repo
level, specially when it involved shared content ( Extras as one
functional example, addons and contribs as another - but non impacted here )

2) This is the more important one : with /6/ and 6.X/ being real
physical locations there is still the door open that allows /6/ to
become the CR repo. Entirely, across the OS/ and Updates/+ CR/ whereas
6.X/cr/ then becomes local to what is representative of a next-release
content repo ( in relation to the point release its injected into ).
This becomes even more relevant when you factor in 'CR/ content will not
move to vault.c.o when the release.X content does'. Furthermore, this
is an important issue when we consider that the CR repo is opt-in,
having a /6/ stream that is always updated and always just-usable
irrespective of what 6.X one installs on their machines is always going
to be a good goal to achieve, imho. Impact on how we do things, how we
store stuff, stage content, get it into the mirrors, export to users and
yum clients : massive. Ofcourse, the only experience that needs to be
protected is the yum-client interface, and can we achieve this refactor
without impacting yum-client interfaces ? I dont know. What I do know,
is that very very few external mirrors have the capacity to handle
something of this nature. Solve'able problems no doubt.

There are also site-specific benefits like being able to add and track
local repo's without needing to add in hackery over the centos mirror
rsync exported content within a release/ or release.X/ tree. And for
people who run multiple machines, or need to have different production
environments this tends to be quite a big deal.

From the user perspective, it should not make a difference as to where
the symlinks are setup to - from. If there is an impact, do tell.

- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.7 i386 and x86_64

2011-09-13 Thread Always Learning
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 00:33 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:

 We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.7 for
 i386 and x86_64 Architectures.

Thank you for all the hard dedicated work.

-- 
With best regards,

Paul.
England,
EU.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.7 i386 and x86_64

2011-09-13 Thread James A. Peltier
Any reason why 5 is not a symlink to 5.7 whereas 4 is a symlink to 4.8?  Looks 
like the same applies to 6!?!

- Original Message -
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
| 
| We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.7
| for
| i386 and x86_64 Architectures.
| 
| CentOS-5.7 is based on the upstream release EL 5.7 and includes
| packages from all variants including Server and Client. All upstream
| repositories have been combined into one, to make it easier for end
| users to work with.
| 
| This is just an announcement email, not the release notes. The Release
| Notes for CentOS-5.7 can be found on-line at :
| http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.7 and everyone is
| encouraged to look through them once. Also worth browsing through are
| the CentOS FAQs at http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ
| 
| +++
| Upgrading from CentOS-5.6 ( or CentOS-5.0/5.1/5.2/5.3/5.4/5.5):
| 
| If you are already running CentOS-5.6 or an older CentOS-5 distro, all
| you need to do is update your machine via yum by running :
| 
| 'yum update'
| 
| Running 'yum list updates' before doing the update is recommended, so
| you can get a list of packages that are going to be updated. To check
| you are indeed on CentOS-5.7, run : 'rpm -q centos-release' and that
| should return: 'centos-release-5-7.el5.centos.1'
| 
| If you are running CentOS-5.6 and have the CR repo enabled, a simple
| 'yum update' will still move your machine to 5.7. But since the CR
| repo
| already contained all the 5.7 updates, there will only be a handful of
| rpms that need to be installed for the 5.6 to 5.7 upgrade. If you are
| not running the CR repo, we highly encourage everyone to install and
| run
| this repository on their machines. More details on the CR repo can be
| found online at
| http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CR
| 
| +++
| Downloading CentOS-5.7 for new installs:
| 
| When possible, consider using torrents to run the downloads. Not only
| does it help the community and keeps mirrors from running up high
| bandwidth bills, in most cases you will find its also the fastest
| means
| to download the distro. There are currently over a hundred people
| seeding CentOS-5 and it's possible to get upto 100mbps downloads via
| these torrents.
| 
| - -- Via BitTorrent :
| CD:
| http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.7/isos/i386/CentOS-5.7-i386-bin-1to8.torrent
| 
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.7/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.7-x86_64-bin-1to8.torrent
| 
| DVD:
| http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.7/isos/i386/CentOS-5.7-i386-bin-DVD.torrent
| 
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.7/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.7-x86_64-bin-DVD.torrent
| 
| md5sum's for these torrent files:
| 
| 8e29e525f45c4a7b3a963cc01ec3459a CentOS-5.7-i386-bin-1to8.torrent
| 32c9e0826b50d6be44823523be403c7f CentOS-5.7-x86_64-bin-1to8.torrent
| 795d6c11b5ef8907653360af52b9f317 CentOS-5.7-i386-bin-DVD.torrent
| 04c563f2c838bf6b255fcc5fcc18cf66 CentOS-5.7-x86_64-bin-DVD.torrent
| 
| sha1sum's for these torrent files:
| 
| 8a945ba89b03328480fde20eaa0b638ceb7f4509
| CentOS-5.7-i386-bin-1to8.torrent
| b1a18ba25e77543c4df9078dfafba990fbd58601
| CentOS-5.7-x86_64-bin-1to8.torrent
| d3c4ed0d14fe1873bbcee931224e5e8819f779dc
| CentOS-5.7-i386-bin-DVD.torrent
| 302850dd4f9a8198b303f872c83a5a16ec1c40c2
| CentOS-5.7-x86_64-bin-DVD.torrent
| 
| 
| While torrent files will do their own content checks, and only the
| right
| torrent will register and download from torrent.centos.org - its very
| important for your own security that an md5/sha1sum check is done on
| the
| .torrent file itself, and ensure that only the torrent.centos.org
| tracker is being used. Sha1sum's are more secure than md5's. Whenever
| possible, use sha1sum's instead of md5.
| 
| - -- Via direct download:
| Due to bandwidth considerations the CentOS Project does not publish
| ISOs
| directly from our network machines. However direct downloads are
| available from external mirrors over http, ftp and rsync. A geoip
| based list is available at
| http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5/isos/
| to give you the best predictable match ( and only lists mirrors that
| are
| updated already, so you don't need to waste time looking for a sync'd
| mirror )
| 
| Some mirrors also publish DVD images that can be downloaded directly.
| Refer to the mirrors list page at http://www.centos.org/mirrors for
| more
| details Mirrors that offer DVDs are clearly marked on the page.
| 
| +++
| sha1sum for these ISOS:
| 
| i386:
| 6acbf1db3f4dce6dce7df15c54394a7cef6c3a7d CentOS-5.7-i386-bin-1of8.iso
| 241e5ea801b449ff59191c620db0a6b00b4aaaf5 CentOS-5.7-i386-bin-2of8.iso
| 0955c2029c1839b1e3601bb4238a2cd6c84e9aca CentOS-5.7-i386-bin-3of8.iso
| 7e094a60e2ddb7904e425487b8c4936e464f10a5 CentOS-5.7-i386-bin-4of8.iso
| 3eb0ee0b146140c4ef812d69fbc8712da1c0661d CentOS-5.7-i386-bin-5of8.iso
| 31b689247da34a58119b91821b13f70424e85a16 CentOS-5.7-i386-bin-6of8.iso

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.7 i386 and x86_64

2011-09-13 Thread John R. Dennison
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:24:48PM -0700, James A. Peltier wrote:
 Any reason why 5 is not a symlink to 5.7 whereas 4 is a symlink to
 4.8?  Looks like the same applies to 6!?!

Because the contents of 5/ are symlinks to the 5.7/ directories!?!




John
-- 
Another age must be the judge.

-- Charles Babbage, realizing the technology did not exist to construct his
   difference engine, 1837; a full-size implementation exists at the Mountain
   View, CA Computer History Museum (CHM), where this quote is displayed.  The
   same can be said of the PLATO computer project, which was celebrated in the
   PLATO@50 conference at the CHM, 2-3 June 2010


pgpEcfBtteuhD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.7 i386 and x86_64

2011-09-13 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/13/11 9:40 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
 On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:24:48PM -0700, James A. Peltier wrote:
   Any reason why 5 is not a symlink to 5.7 whereas 4 is a symlink to
   4.8?  Looks like the same applies to 6!?!
 Because the contents of 5/ are symlinks to the 5.7/ directories!?!

yeah I noticed that they've changed that.  in 4.x, cd centos; ln -s 4 
4.8   but in 5.x+, its more like,

 cd centos/5.7
 for i in *; do ln $i ../5/$i; done



-- 
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.7 i386 and x86_64

2011-09-13 Thread James A. Peltier
- Original Message -
| On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:24:48PM -0700, James A. Peltier wrote:
|  Any reason why 5 is not a symlink to 5.7 whereas 4 is a symlink to
|  4.8? Looks like the same applies to 6!?!
| 
| Because the contents of 5/ are symlinks to the 5.7/ directories!?!

Yes, I did notice that, just wondered why.  It seems more prone to breakage 
(creating multiple symlinks vs one)
-- 
James A. Peltier
IT Services - Research Computing Group
Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus
Phone   : 778-782-6573
Fax : 778-782-3045
E-Mail  : jpelt...@sfu.ca
Website : http://www.sfu.ca/itservices
  http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier
I will do the best I can with the talent I have

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos