Re: [CentOS] Bacula dbcheck in CentOS6
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > I don't have an account on the Redhat bugzilla, so that'll be for > someone else. The accounts are free to all. jh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bacula dbcheck in CentOS6
Am 24.11.2011 14:28, schrieb Karanbir Singh: > On 11/24/2011 09:13 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote: >>> Anyone else notice that /usr/libexec/bacula/make_catalog_backup.pl runs a >>> "dbcheck -B" >>> which doesn't seem to exist in the version of dbcheck shipped with it? >>> >>> That makes it rather hard to do a catalogue backup with the shipped script? >> >> That's an error in the RPM install script. > > Hope you filed a bugreport! ( bugs.centos.org and the if needed followup > with a report at bugzilla.redhat.com, and cross reference ) Indeed I did, after finding to my surprise that it hadn't been reported yet: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5260 I don't have an account on the Redhat bugzilla, so that'll be for someone else. -- Tilman Schmidt Phoenix Software GmbH Bonn, Germany ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bacula dbcheck in CentOS6
On 11/24/2011 09:13 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote: >> Anyone else notice that /usr/libexec/bacula/make_catalog_backup.pl runs a >> "dbcheck -B" >> which doesn't seem to exist in the version of dbcheck shipped with it? >> >> That makes it rather hard to do a catalogue backup with the shipped script? > > That's an error in the RPM install script. Hope you filed a bugreport! ( bugs.centos.org and the if needed followup with a report at bugzilla.redhat.com, and cross reference ) - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Bacula dbcheck in CentOS6
[Is it true that nobody replied to this in four months?] On Mon Jul 18 09:34:08 EDT 2011, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Anyone else notice that /usr/libexec/bacula/make_catalog_backup.pl runs a > "dbcheck -B" > which doesn't seem to exist in the version of dbcheck shipped with it? > > That makes it rather hard to do a catalogue backup with the shipped script? That's an error in the RPM install script. It uses the "alternatives" mechanism for switching between database backends but messes up. /usr/sbin/dbcheck ends up being linked to /usr/sbin/bscan.mysql instead of /usr/sbin/dbcheck.mysql. Consequently, when make_catalog_backup.pl tries to run dbcheck it's actually bscan which gets run. Not understanding the -B option is probably the least of its problems. :-) Until the RPM gets fixed, you can manually correct the bad symlink with: ln -sf /etc/alternatives/bacula-dbcheck /usr/sbin/dbcheck HTH T. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Bacula dbcheck in CentOS6
Anyone else notice that /usr/libexec/bacula/make_catalog_backup.pl runs a "dbcheck -B" which doesn't seem to exist in the version of dbcheck shipped with it? # strings /usr/sbin/dbcheck |grep -i print sprintf vfprintf snprintf -dt print timestamp in debug output -?print this message %d block read errors not printed. That makes it rather hard to do a catalogue backup with the shipped script? jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
