Re: [CentOS] Centos7 ds-389

2014-12-02 Thread Johan Vermeulen


Op 26-11-14 om 09:27 schreef Johan Vermeulen:


Op 25-11-14 om 19:08 schreef Tris Hoar:

On 25/11/2014 16:52, Johan Vermeulen wrote:

Hello All,

I'm looking at setting up ds-389 on both Centos6.6 en Centos7, both
minimal installs with
epel repo enabled.

When running yum search ds-389 on Centos7 I get only 3 packages,

389-ds-base
389-ds-base-devel
389-ds-base-libs

On Centos6.6 I get the whole list:

389-ds.noarch : 389 Directory, Administration, and Console Suite
389-ds-base.x86_64 : 389 Directory Server (base)
389-ds-base-devel.i686 : Development libraries for 389 Directory Server
389-ds-base-devel.x86_64 : Development libraries for 389 Directory 
Server

389-ds-base-libs.i686 : Core libraries for 389 Directory Server
389-ds-base-libs.x86_64 : Core libraries for 389 Directory Server
389-ds-console.noarch : 389 Directory Server Management Console
389-ds-console-doc.noarch : Web docs for 389 Directory Server 
Management

Console
389-dsgw.x86_64 : 389 Directory Server Gateway (dsgw)

Is this a change in policy?

I apologise if this has been answered before.
A quick google did not provide an answer.

Greetings, Johan



Half the those packages are for i686 which is not longer a supported 
architecture in 7, and many of the others are from epel


389-ds-base.x86_64   1.2.11.15-48.el6_6 rhel-x86_64-server-6
389-ds-base-devel.x86_64 1.2.11.15-48.el6_6 
rhel-x86_64-server-optional-6

389-ds-base-libs.x86_64  1.2.11.15-48.el6_6 rhel-x86_64-server-6

Is what I see on one of my RHEL6 servers.

Tris


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom 
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please 
notify postmas...@bgfl.org


The views expressed within this email are those of the individual, 
and not necessarily those of the organisation

*
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Hello Tris,

thanks for the reply. You are right, some of the packages are i686, 
logically they are nog in Centos7.

But I have epel enabled on the Centos7 box and I am not seeing

 389-admin.x86_64 : 389 Administration Server (admin)
389-admin-console.noarch : 389 Admin Server Management Console

The setup works without 389-admin as far as I can see on a first test, 
but launching

the console is difficult without 389-admin-console.

Greetings, Johan

I found the answer here:

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47865

Looks like the other 389-ds packages are due for Centos7.1.

Greetings, J.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos7 ds-389

2014-11-26 Thread Johan Vermeulen


Op 25-11-14 om 19:08 schreef Tris Hoar:

On 25/11/2014 16:52, Johan Vermeulen wrote:

Hello All,

I'm looking at setting up ds-389 on both Centos6.6 en Centos7, both
minimal installs with
epel repo enabled.

When running yum search ds-389 on Centos7 I get only 3 packages,

389-ds-base
389-ds-base-devel
389-ds-base-libs

On Centos6.6 I get the whole list:

389-ds.noarch : 389 Directory, Administration, and Console Suite
389-ds-base.x86_64 : 389 Directory Server (base)
389-ds-base-devel.i686 : Development libraries for 389 Directory Server
389-ds-base-devel.x86_64 : Development libraries for 389 Directory 
Server

389-ds-base-libs.i686 : Core libraries for 389 Directory Server
389-ds-base-libs.x86_64 : Core libraries for 389 Directory Server
389-ds-console.noarch : 389 Directory Server Management Console
389-ds-console-doc.noarch : Web docs for 389 Directory Server Management
Console
389-dsgw.x86_64 : 389 Directory Server Gateway (dsgw)

Is this a change in policy?

I apologise if this has been answered before.
A quick google did not provide an answer.

Greetings, Johan



Half the those packages are for i686 which is not longer a supported 
architecture in 7, and many of the others are from epel


389-ds-base.x86_64   1.2.11.15-48.el6_6   rhel-x86_64-server-6
389-ds-base-devel.x86_64 1.2.11.15-48.el6_6 rhel-x86_64-server-optional-6
389-ds-base-libs.x86_64  1.2.11.15-48.el6_6   rhel-x86_64-server-6

Is what I see on one of my RHEL6 servers.

Tris


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom 
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please 
notify postmas...@bgfl.org


The views expressed within this email are those of the individual, and 
not necessarily those of the organisation

*
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Hello Tris,

thanks for the reply. You are right, some of the packages are i686, 
logically they are nog in Centos7.

But I have epel enabled on the Centos7 box and I am not seeing

 389-admin.x86_64 : 389 Administration Server (admin)
389-admin-console.noarch : 389 Admin Server Management Console

The setup works without 389-admin as far as I can see on a first test, 
but launching

the console is difficult without 389-admin-console.

Greetings, Johan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Centos7 ds-389

2014-11-25 Thread Johan Vermeulen

Hello All,

I'm looking at setting up ds-389 on both Centos6.6 en Centos7, both 
minimal installs with

epel repo enabled.

When running yum search ds-389 on Centos7 I get only 3 packages,

389-ds-base
389-ds-base-devel
389-ds-base-libs

On Centos6.6 I get the whole list:

389-ds.noarch : 389 Directory, Administration, and Console Suite
389-ds-base.x86_64 : 389 Directory Server (base)
389-ds-base-devel.i686 : Development libraries for 389 Directory Server
389-ds-base-devel.x86_64 : Development libraries for 389 Directory Server
389-ds-base-libs.i686 : Core libraries for 389 Directory Server
389-ds-base-libs.x86_64 : Core libraries for 389 Directory Server
389-ds-console.noarch : 389 Directory Server Management Console
389-ds-console-doc.noarch : Web docs for 389 Directory Server Management 
Console

389-dsgw.x86_64 : 389 Directory Server Gateway (dsgw)

Is this a change in policy?

I apologise if this has been answered before.
A quick google did not provide an answer.

Greetings, Johan

--
Johan Vermeulen
IT-medewerker

Powered by Linux.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos7 ds-389

2014-11-25 Thread Tris Hoar

On 25/11/2014 16:52, Johan Vermeulen wrote:

Hello All,

I'm looking at setting up ds-389 on both Centos6.6 en Centos7, both
minimal installs with
epel repo enabled.

When running yum search ds-389 on Centos7 I get only 3 packages,

389-ds-base
389-ds-base-devel
389-ds-base-libs

On Centos6.6 I get the whole list:

389-ds.noarch : 389 Directory, Administration, and Console Suite
389-ds-base.x86_64 : 389 Directory Server (base)
389-ds-base-devel.i686 : Development libraries for 389 Directory Server
389-ds-base-devel.x86_64 : Development libraries for 389 Directory Server
389-ds-base-libs.i686 : Core libraries for 389 Directory Server
389-ds-base-libs.x86_64 : Core libraries for 389 Directory Server
389-ds-console.noarch : 389 Directory Server Management Console
389-ds-console-doc.noarch : Web docs for 389 Directory Server Management
Console
389-dsgw.x86_64 : 389 Directory Server Gateway (dsgw)

Is this a change in policy?

I apologise if this has been answered before.
A quick google did not provide an answer.

Greetings, Johan



Half the those packages are for i686 which is not longer a supported 
architecture in 7, and many of the others are from epel


389-ds-base.x86_64   1.2.11.15-48.el6_6   rhel-x86_64-server-6
389-ds-base-devel.x86_64 1.2.11.15-48.el6_6 
rhel-x86_64-server-optional-6

389-ds-base-libs.x86_64  1.2.11.15-48.el6_6   rhel-x86_64-server-6

Is what I see on one of my RHEL6 servers.

Tris


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 
to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email 
in error please notify postmas...@bgfl.org


The views expressed within this email are those of the 
individual, and not necessarily those of the organisation

*
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos