RE: [CentOS] Latest samaba updates

2008-07-12 Thread John
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of David G. Mackay
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 8:24 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: RE: [CentOS] Latest samaba updates

On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 12:32 -0400, John wrote:
 Remember this. It is going to work when set to Permisive regardless!! 

Thanks, I will remember.  Now I just need to find out what it means by
read-only.  A find -perm 400 on the directory gives no hits, nor do most
other variations, like 444, etc.

Dave
---
See man ls. There is special SELinux Context Perms that it will show using
the special ls options. Otherwise with a regular ls /dev/null you want see.
I do remember seeing a few SE Linux know hows on the list maybe they can
chime in on this for you.

JohnStanley


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] Latest samaba updates

2008-07-11 Thread David G. Mackay
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 12:32 -0400, John wrote:
 Remember this. It is going to work when set to Permisive regardless!! 

Thanks, I will remember.  Now I just need to find out what it means by
read-only.  A find -perm 400 on the directory gives no hits, nor do most
other variations, like 444, etc.

Dave


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Latest samaba updates

2008-07-11 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:24 AM, David G. Mackay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks, I will remember.  Now I just need to find out what it means by
 read-only.  A find -perm 400 on the directory gives no hits, nor do most
 other variations, like 444, etc.

Try:

find . \! -perm /222

See man find for details.

HTH,
Filipe
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Latest samaba updates

2008-07-11 Thread David G. Mackay

On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 09:09 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: 
 On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:24 AM, David G. Mackay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thanks, I will remember.  Now I just need to find out what it means by
  read-only.  A find -perm 400 on the directory gives no hits, nor do most
  other variations, like 444, etc.
 
 Try:
 
 find . \! -perm /222
 
 See man find for details.

Thank you.  The other question is whether selinux is concerned about a
file being r/o at the owner, group, or anonymous level.  Is 644 OK, or
640, or 644?

Dave


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] Latest samaba updates

2008-07-10 Thread John
Remember this. It is going to work when set to Permisive regardless!! 


John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of David G. Mackay
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 10:36 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: RE: [CentOS] Latest samaba updates


On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 02:33 -0400, John wrote:
 Did it give you a rpm.new.smb.config file on update of Samba? Users 
 file also? I would first check my Selinux file Permissions for Samba. 
 Then file permissions on the shared directories and also make sure 
 that they are replicating on the file in the directory.
 
 My idea would be disable SE Linux then make sure all you permissions 
 are correct for the shares, then enable selinux. From you bug report 
 it looks like permision problems. Also you have new selinux options in 
 your smb.conf file, so check them out also.

The plot thickens.  I set selinux to permissive, and was able to log in from
the windows VM.  Next, I set up a new CentOS5.2 VM, and got samba going on
it.  Then I updated everything but the samba and selinux policy packages and
everything still worked.  Finally, I added the samba and selinux packages,
and everything worked as it should.  I have no idea what set of
circumstances led to the original failure.  I guess I'll just have to
reinstall Centos on the real iron.

Dave


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] Latest samaba updates

2008-07-09 Thread John
 -Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of David G. Mackay
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 5:20 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Latest samaba updates

When I let yum install the latest samba updates, it ate my smb users file
and smb.conf.  Once I restored those, it gave me several selinux avc
denials, one of which I can't clear up.  See
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2965 for details.

Anyone else having problems like this?

Dave

Did it give you a rpm.new.smb.config file on update of Samba? Users file
also? I would first check my Selinux file Permissions for Samba. Then file
permissions on the shared directories and also make sure that they are
replicating on the file in the directory.

My idea would be disable SE Linux then make sure all you permissions are
correct for the shares, then enable selinux. From you bug report it looks
like permision problems. Also you have new selinux options in your smb.conf
file, so check them out also.

Good Luck,
JohnStanley


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] Latest samaba updates

2008-07-09 Thread David G. Mackay

On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 02:33 -0400, John wrote:
 Did it give you a rpm.new.smb.config file on update of Samba? Users file
 also? I would first check my Selinux file Permissions for Samba. Then file
 permissions on the shared directories and also make sure that they are
 replicating on the file in the directory.
 
 My idea would be disable SE Linux then make sure all you permissions are
 correct for the shares, then enable selinux. From you bug report it looks
 like permision problems. Also you have new selinux options in your smb.conf
 file, so check them out also.

The plot thickens.  I set selinux to permissive, and was able to log in
from the windows VM.  Next, I set up a new CentOS5.2 VM, and got samba
going on it.  Then I updated everything but the samba and selinux policy
packages and everything still worked.  Finally, I added the samba and
selinux packages, and everything worked as it should.  I have no idea
what set of circumstances led to the original failure.  I guess I'll
just have to reinstall Centos on the real iron.

Dave


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Latest samaba updates

2008-07-08 Thread David G. Mackay
When I let yum install the latest samba updates, it ate my smb users
file and smb.conf.  Once I restored those, it gave me several selinux
avc denials, one of which I can't clear up.  See
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2965 for details.

Anyone else having problems like this?

Dave


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos