Re: [CentOS] Missing something about sendmail
Paul R. Ganci wrote: Hi All, I have a strange problem that I don't understand. I have an access file which has the following line: Did you run makemap? Does the db file contain the same stuff as the text file? Christopher ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Missing something about sendmail
Christopher Chan wrote: I have a strange problem that I don't understand. I have an access file which has the following line: Did you run makemap? Does the db file contain the same stuff as the text file? Yes. The output of makemap -u hash access.db access_dump shows 168.144.250.215 OK # xsmtp02.mail2web.com It is there. After a lot of research I realized I am using two features that muck with the check_relay ruleset. The DCC hackmc script to make DCC understand about whitelisting from the access database and FEATURE(`require_rdns2',`forgedignore')dnl which requires the relay to have a rDNS. This changes the usual check_relay code albeit I haven't figured out how it can generate a 553 error code along with an OK. -- Paul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Missing something about sendmail
Paul R. Ganci wrote on Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:23:33 -0600: OK # xsmtp02.mail2web.com You cannot put comments in the file like this, it's interpreted as the error message. You can use only comments that start the line. Is this because I have commented out dnl FEATURE(delay_checks)dnl in my sendmail.mc? No, delay_checks is necessary for instance if you want to use other access mechanisms like SMTP AUTH. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Missing something about sendmail
Kai Schaetzl wrote: OK # xsmtp02.mail2web.com You cannot put comments in the file like this, it's interpreted as the error message. You can use only comments that start the line Crap ... after all the experience I had with sendmail I never realized that. I guess you learn something new every day. Thanks that seems to have fixed the problem. -- Paul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Missing something about sendmail
Hi All, I have a strange problem that I don't understand. I have an access file which has the following line: 168.144.250.215 OK # xsmtp02.mail2web.com Yet email from this IP address is getting rejected. From my log file Oct 15 21:52:33 mx01 sendmail[10569]: ruleset=check_relay, arg1=xsmtp02.mail2web.com, arg2=168.144.250.215, relay=xsmtp02.mail2web.com [168.144.250.215], reject=553 5.3.0 OK # xsmtp02.mail2web.com Is this because I have commented out dnl FEATURE(delay_checks)dnl in my sendmail.mc? What is the ruleset check_relay actually doing in this case. I have seen other cases where it rejected a message but always with a useful message. why is there a reject=553 code but with an OK after it? Can somebody give me a clue as to what I have misconfigured. -- Paul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
