Re: [CentOS] New installation woes
Steve Huff wrote: > On Nov 19, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Vandaman wrote: > > > What is the bug? It does not appear in the site you > linked to. > > It would be surprising if Red Hat are unaware of > upstream changes > > as one would expect it to be rolled out into Fedora > rawhide at least > > even if the changes are backported int RHEL. > > > we went over this last month: > > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/065972.html > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066185.html > > and also on the rpmforge users list: > > http://lists.rpmforge.net/pipermail/users/2008-October/001973.html > > you were on the CentOS list then, i'm surprised you > don't remember. please search the archives before > posting; what you said has nothing to do with the issue. > Seems a little impertinent what our learned friend Steve Huff has sent to me off-list in a huff :- - I was subscribed for a few days last month. - Many of us don't do "just CentOS". We have other mailing lists and OS's installed. We also happen to have lives as well to live. - Even this month when I'm subscribed fulltime to the list, I don't read all messages on the list (nuff' said). - What is posted on the list is "not Gospel". If something affects all CentOS users, perhaps a prominent announcement could be made on the website or somewhere. - I'm sure there are issues other than the Debian Openssl bug that affect all CentOS users. Regards, Vandaman. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] New installation woes
Dag Wieers wrote on Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:23:56 +0100 (CET): > The reason we have a perl-DBD-mysql is because that is the upstream name > and the naming convention dictates to use the upstream name. That is the > only reliable way for not having RPM clashes. But was it necessary to obsolete perl-DBD-MySQL? The older versions (up to 4.007) obviously didn't and there was no priorities problem until then (with 4.008). There was another package (I don't recall the name, python stuff?) that had the same problems recently. I agree that check_obsoletes should have been in the yum config in the first place, but on first glance and from my point of view as just being a user and not a packager the obsoletion seems to have been unnecessary. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] New installation woes
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Vandaman wrote: What is the bug? It does not appear in the site you linked to. It would be surprising if Red Hat are unaware of upstream changes as one would expect it to be rolled out into Fedora rawhide at least even if the changes are backported int RHEL. *packaging bug* the link shows that upstream is named all lowercase for mysql, so the rpm should also. And the other bug is in yum-priorities. It is not protecting base against certain dependencies being pulled that obsolete base packages. The plugin should reject non-base packages that replace base packages much like it protects from updating base packages with non-base packages. Someone interested to become famous by looking into and fixing this ? -- -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] New installation woes
Vandaman wrote: Dag Wieers wrote: We did not do anything. It is a bug in the priorities plugin. The reason we have a perl-DBD-mysql is because that is the upstream name and the naming convention dictates to use the upstream name. That is the only reliable way for not having RPM clashes. Maybe someone should report to Red Hat that perl-DBD-MySQL has a packaging bug ? http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBD-mysql/ What is the bug? It does not appear in the site you linked to. It would be surprising if Red Hat are unaware of upstream changes as one would expect it to be rolled out into Fedora rawhide at least even if the changes are backported int RHEL. *packaging bug* the link shows that upstream is named all lowercase for mysql, so the rpm should also. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] New installation woes
Dag Wieers wrote: > We did not do anything. It is a bug in the priorities > plugin. > > The reason we have a perl-DBD-mysql is because that is the > upstream name and the naming convention dictates to use the > upstream name. That is the only reliable way for not having > RPM clashes. > > Maybe someone should report to Red Hat that perl-DBD-MySQL > has a packaging bug ? > > http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBD-mysql/ > What is the bug? It does not appear in the site you linked to. It would be surprising if Red Hat are unaware of upstream changes as one would expect it to be rolled out into Fedora rawhide at least even if the changes are backported int RHEL. Regards, Vandaman. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] New installation woes
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:27:24 +0100: You seem to have the rpmforge repository installed, because the package in the base repositories is called perl-DBD-MySQL (note the mixed case MySQL). and got replaced because the default install of yum-priorities doesn't check_obsoletes. base package perl-DBD-MySQL was indeed obsoleted by the rpmforge perl-DBD-mysql a few weeks ago. I fear a lot of people got caught by this without guard. I wonder why rpmforge did this. We did not do anything. It is a bug in the priorities plugin. The reason we have a perl-DBD-mysql is because that is the upstream name and the naming convention dictates to use the upstream name. That is the only reliable way for not having RPM clashes. Maybe someone should report to Red Hat that perl-DBD-MySQL has a packaging bug ? http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBD-mysql/ -- -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] New installation woes
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:27:24 +0100: You seem to have the rpmforge repository installed, because the package in the base repositories is called perl-DBD-MySQL (note the mixed case MySQL). and got replaced because the default install of yum-priorities doesn't check_obsoletes. base package perl-DBD-MySQL was indeed obsoleted by the rpmforge perl-DBD-mysql a few weeks ago. I fear a lot of people got caught by this without guard. I wonder why rpmforge did this. Kai Yes, I did place rpmforge, mirrors.rpmforge, rhel-mondo, and rpmforge in the repos. I had not installed the protect base or the priorities at the time of the intitial update. Just now, I ran update with the other repos disabled and got about 5 libraries updated. Now, what is the fix to update the rest of the things that amount to about 30 or so packages? I will get the priorities and protect base before running any further updates. Sam ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] New installation woes
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:27:24 +0100: > You seem to have the rpmforge repository installed, because the package > in the base repositories is called perl-DBD-MySQL (note the mixed case > MySQL). and got replaced because the default install of yum-priorities doesn't check_obsoletes. base package perl-DBD-MySQL was indeed obsoleted by the rpmforge perl-DBD-mysql a few weeks ago. I fear a lot of people got caught by this without guard. I wonder why rpmforge did this. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] New installation woes
Sam Drinkard wrote: > I've just installed CentOS 5.2 for the x86_64 on a SuperMicro X6DA8-G > board with two 250g SATA drives configured in the bios as a raid 1 > array. After getting the base installed, I've tried to yum update the > system and I wind up with these errors > > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: Missing Dependency: > libmysqlclient.so.14(libmysqlclient_14)(64bit) is needed by package > perl-DBD-mysql You seem to have the rpmforge repository installed, because the package in the base repositories is called perl-DBD-MySQL (note the mixed case MySQL). You should use the priorities plugin to clear that up. And you need to exclude perl-DBD-mysql from the rpmforge repository, as the priorities plugin seems to be case sensitive. More information on Priorities: http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities More info on Repositories: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories Cheers, Ralph pgpRF8g3bWqFK.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] New installation woes
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Sam Drinkard wrote: I've just installed CentOS 5.2 for the x86_64 on a SuperMicro X6DA8-G board with two 250g SATA drives configured in the bios as a raid 1 array. After getting the base installed, I've tried to yum update the system and I wind up with these errors --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.14(libmysqlclient_14)(64bit) is needed by package snip I'd like to think that out of the box centos would at least update without a bunch of missing dependencies. Any pointers as to what the best solution is? Thanks.. Sam What is in /etc/yum.repos.d? -- Jim Wildman, CISSP, RHCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rossberry.com "Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one." Thomas Paine ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] New installation woes
I've just installed CentOS 5.2 for the x86_64 on a SuperMicro X6DA8-G board with two 250g SATA drives configured in the bios as a raid 1 array. After getting the base installed, I've tried to yum update the system and I wind up with these errors --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.14(libmysqlclient_14)(64bit) is needed by package perl-DBD-mysql Error: Missing Dependency: libgsf-1.so.1()(64bit) is needed by package libwpd Error: Missing Dependency: libneon.so.24()(64bit) is needed by package subversion Error: Missing Dependency: libaprutil-0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package subversion Error: Missing Dependency: libpq.so.3()(64bit) is needed by package perl-DBD-Pg Error: Missing Dependency: libapr-0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package subversion Error: Missing Dependency: libevent-1.1a.so.1()(64bit) is needed by package nfs-utils Error: Missing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.14()(64bit) is needed by package perl-DBD-mysql I'd like to think that out of the box centos would at least update without a bunch of missing dependencies. Any pointers as to what the best solution is? Thanks.. Sam ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
