Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-29 Thread JohnS

On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 15:15 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
 On 05/28/2009 02:11 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
  3Ware and Areca supply quite useful utilities that also work in Linux
  very well.
 
 yes, some of the LSI and HP kit is also quite handy to work with. I was 
 going to setup a section on these HBA's in the wiki, would you be able 
 to help on that ? If so, drop an email to the centos-docs list with your 
 WikiName and we can take it from there. I'll do a template of what is in 
 my mind in a few minutes time.
---
Karan

Be aware there is no managment solution for the particular card that she
has Adaptec 2200S. RHEL and CentOS v5 are not supported.

JohnStanley

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-29 Thread JohnS

On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 09:25 -0700, Dianne Yumul wrote:
 Thanks for the help Karanbir and Rainer.
 
  That sounds quite silly - also going through reboots means downtime,
  isnt that the sort of thing that raid1 was designed to protect against
  anyway.
 
 I guess it would be silly :). I just wanted to make sure it was doing  
 what it ought too.
 
  Have you looked into adaptec supplied management s/w ? In pretty much
  ever case with such hba's the most functional way to look at state  
  and
  do any management on raid tends to be from vendor supplied s/w
 
  Adaptec - I don't know.
  They aquired a lot of companies over the years and thus the quality of
  the management-apps is/was sometimes questionable - and you never knew
  which one was good and which one wasn't as it varied between different
  revisions of the same hardware (which might have a similar name but a
  totally different tech inside...).
 
 I checked the Adaptec site again and found a link to the Adaptec  
 Storage Manager.

Be aware the Storage Manager does not support CentOS 5.

 I don't know how I missed that, thanks for the push in the right  
 direction.
 Hopefully it works.
 
 Thanks,
 
 dianne
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-28 Thread Karanbir Singh
Hi,

On 05/27/2009 06:17 PM, Dianne Yumul wrote:
 I was hoping to get recommendations on the proper way to test a RAID
 1 hardware configuration.  The controller is an Adaptec 2200S.  I
 found an article, but not for this controller, that suggests to power
 off the system, pull one of the drives, boot the OS and power off
 again. Would this be the way to go?

That sounds quite silly - also going through reboots means downtime, 
isnt that the sort of thing that raid1 was designed to protect against 
anyway.

 Also any suggestions on what to use to monitor it as well? Can't get
 smartmontools to work.

Have you looked into adaptec supplied management s/w ? In pretty much 
ever case with such hba's the most functional way to look at state and 
do any management on raid tends to be from vendor supplied s/w


-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : 2522...@icq
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-28 Thread Rainer Duffner
Karanbir Singh schrieb:

 Have you looked into adaptec supplied management s/w ? In pretty much 
 ever case with such hba's the most functional way to look at state and 
 do any management on raid tends to be from vendor supplied s/w


   

3Ware and Areca supply quite useful utilities that also work in Linux
very well.

Adaptec - I don't know.
They aquired a lot of companies over the years and thus the quality of
the management-apps is/was sometimes questionable - and you never knew
which one was good and which one wasn't as it varied between different
revisions of the same hardware (which might have a similar name but a
totally different tech inside...).

I've got lot's of Adaptec-SCSI gear at home - just no use for it
anymore, because SCSI-drives don't make sense anymore in a desktop.
It's not even the capacity - it's the noise.



Rainer




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-28 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 05/28/2009 02:11 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
 3Ware and Areca supply quite useful utilities that also work in Linux
 very well.

yes, some of the LSI and HP kit is also quite handy to work with. I was 
going to setup a section on these HBA's in the wiki, would you be able 
to help on that ? If so, drop an email to the centos-docs list with your 
WikiName and we can take it from there. I'll do a template of what is in 
my mind in a few minutes time.

-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : 2522...@icq
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-28 Thread Dianne Yumul
Thanks for the help Karanbir and Rainer.

 That sounds quite silly - also going through reboots means downtime,
 isnt that the sort of thing that raid1 was designed to protect against
 anyway.

I guess it would be silly :). I just wanted to make sure it was doing  
what it ought too.

 Have you looked into adaptec supplied management s/w ? In pretty much
 ever case with such hba's the most functional way to look at state  
 and
 do any management on raid tends to be from vendor supplied s/w

 Adaptec - I don't know.
 They aquired a lot of companies over the years and thus the quality of
 the management-apps is/was sometimes questionable - and you never knew
 which one was good and which one wasn't as it varied between different
 revisions of the same hardware (which might have a similar name but a
 totally different tech inside...).

I checked the Adaptec site again and found a link to the Adaptec  
Storage Manager.
I don't know how I missed that, thanks for the push in the right  
direction.
Hopefully it works.

Thanks,

dianne
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-28 Thread Scott Silva
on 5-28-2009 9:25 AM Dianne Yumul spake the following:
 Thanks for the help Karanbir and Rainer.
 
 That sounds quite silly - also going through reboots means downtime,
 isnt that the sort of thing that raid1 was designed to protect against
 anyway.
 
 I guess it would be silly :). I just wanted to make sure it was doing  
 what it ought too.
 
 Have you looked into adaptec supplied management s/w ? In pretty much
 ever case with such hba's the most functional way to look at state  
 and
 do any management on raid tends to be from vendor supplied s/w
 Adaptec - I don't know.
 They aquired a lot of companies over the years and thus the quality of
 the management-apps is/was sometimes questionable - and you never knew
 which one was good and which one wasn't as it varied between different
 revisions of the same hardware (which might have a similar name but a
 totally different tech inside...).
 
 I checked the Adaptec site again and found a link to the Adaptec  
 Storage Manager.
 I don't know how I missed that, thanks for the push in the right  
 direction.
 Hopefully it works.
 
It worked for me when I ran a 2800S, but it is far from a light weight app.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-28 Thread Guy Boisvert
Dianne Yumul wrote:
 
 I checked the Adaptec site again and found a link to the Adaptec  
 Storage Manager.
 I don't know how I missed that, thanks for the push in the right  
 direction.
 Hopefully it works.
 
 Thanks,
 
 dianne

Hi,

I use the Adaptec Storage manager under CentOS 5 (with Adaptec 3405 
HBA).  It seems to be decent (functionality wise) but i saw that it 
works under Java...  My deception was great when i saw that.  I had 
numerous problems with Java and management tools on the past.  I just 
hope i wont't have to fight with Java all over again...


Guy Boisvert, ing.
IngTegration inc.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-28 Thread Dianne Yumul
Thanks Scott and Guy, I appreciate the advice/warning.

I can't download it at the moment because the Adaptec site requires  
the serial number. I have to reboot and get it from the SMOR (Storage  
Manager on ROM) utility. Then I'll have to see if it's worth the  
trouble to install and run :)

Would you have any suggestions on how I would test the RAID 1  
configuration? (Sorry if you already saw the question on the previous  
posts)

Thanks,

dianne
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-28 Thread Phil Schaffner
Dianne Yumul wrote:
...
 Would you have any suggestions on how I would test the RAID 1  
 configuration? (Sorry if you already saw the question on the previous  
 posts)

Dianne,

If you feel you must test the functionality of the ability of the RAID1 
to recover from a failed drive, the power down, remove drive, boot, 
power down, replace drive, boot process will test the ability of the 
system to re-sync the drives.  A more rigorous test would be to zero out 
the partition table of the removed drive, or to use a new blank drive to 
test the recovery; however, what I think Karanbir meant by silly is 
that all these tests simply confirm that the RAID is working as 
designed.  If it doesn't, then you should have bought different hardware 
to start with.

Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-28 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 05/28/2009 07:43 PM, Dianne Yumul wrote:
 I can't download it at the moment because the Adaptec site requires
 the serial number. I have to reboot and get it from the SMOR (Storage
 Manager on ROM) utility. Then I'll have to see if it's worth the
 trouble to install and run :)

what sort of license is this distributed under ?


-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : 2522...@icq
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-28 Thread Dianne Yumul
On May 28, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:

 If you feel you must test the functionality of the ability of the  
 RAID1
 to recover from a failed drive, the power down, remove drive, boot,
 power down, replace drive, boot process will test the ability of the
 system to re-sync the drives.  A more rigorous test would be to  
 zero out
 the partition table of the removed drive, or to use a new blank  
 drive to
 test the recovery; however, what I think Karanbir meant by silly is
 that all these tests simply confirm that the RAID is working as
 designed.  If it doesn't, then you should have bought different  
 hardware
 to start with.

Thanks Phil for the clarification, felt like the light bulb suddenly  
turned on in my head. I should be more concerned at monitoring the  
health of the hard drives then.

dianne
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-28 Thread Dianne Yumul

On May 28, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:

what sort of license is this distributed under ?


I'm sorry but I'm not sure. It's software that supposedly comes with  
it when you buy it. But the server was assembled by somebody else and  
they probably neglected to include the CD when they shipped the  
server to us. Here's the page with the download link.


http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/speed/raid/aac/sm/asm-linux_v2_12(922) 
_rpm.htm


I'm going to give it a try but don't know when because I would have  
to bring the server down just to get the serial number.


Thanks Karanbir and everyone for all the help.

dianne___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-28 Thread Les Mikesell
Phil Schaffner wrote:
 Dianne Yumul wrote:
 ...
 Would you have any suggestions on how I would test the RAID 1  
 configuration? (Sorry if you already saw the question on the previous  
 posts)
 
 Dianne,
 
 If you feel you must test the functionality of the ability of the RAID1 
 to recover from a failed drive, the power down, remove drive, boot, 
 power down, replace drive, boot process will test the ability of the 
 system to re-sync the drives.  A more rigorous test would be to zero out 
 the partition table of the removed drive, or to use a new blank drive to 
 test the recovery; however, what I think Karanbir meant by silly is 
 that all these tests simply confirm that the RAID is working as 
 designed.  If it doesn't, then you should have bought different hardware 
 to start with.

The thing you need to know about RAIDs at runtime is whether or not one 
or more of the drives have already failed since their job is to hide 
this fact from you but you still need to replace it before you lose the 
other one and your data.  Most systems have an error light or something 
that doesn't help much in a remote data center - so you need some 
hardware-specific monitor tool to report the status.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-28 Thread Dianne Yumul
On May 28, 2009, at 2:01 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:

 The thing you need to know about RAIDs at runtime is whether or not  
 one
 or more of the drives have already failed since their job is to hide
 this fact from you but you still need to replace it before you lose  
 the
 other one and your data...

Got it. Thank you Les, I appreciate the explanation.

dianne
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-28 Thread Scott Silva
on 5-28-2009 1:56 PM Dianne Yumul spake the following:
 On May 28, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
 what sort of license is this distributed under ?
 
 I'm sorry but I'm not sure. It's software that supposedly comes with it
 when you buy it. But the server was assembled by somebody else and they
 probably neglected to include the CD when they shipped the server to us.
 Here's the page with the download link.
 
 http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/speed/raid/aac/sm/asm-linux_v2_12(922)_rpm.htm
 
 I'm going to give it a try but don't know when because I would have to
 bring the server down just to get the serial number.
 
 Thanks Karanbir and everyone for all the help.
 
 dianne
 
Sent you a message offlist on this...



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-27 Thread Dianne Yumul
Hello everyone,

I was hoping to get recommendations on the proper way to test a RAID  
1 hardware configuration.  The controller is an Adaptec 2200S.  I  
found an article, but not for this controller, that suggests to power  
off the system, pull one of the drives, boot the OS and power off  
again. Would this be the way to go?

Also any suggestions on what to use to monitor it as well? Can't get  
smartmontools to work.

Thank you and have a nice day.

Dianne
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos