[CentOS] Re: Linux backup help

2008-11-18 Thread Scott Silva
on 11-14-2008 1:09 PM Amos Shapira spake the following:
 Is there a way to freeze a list of installed packages and exact
 versions, then tell yum (or any other tool/script) to install exactly
 these verions either on the same or another systme?
 
 I'm asking from perspective of being able to update and test in my
 test or staging environment then when tests pass I want to replicate
 the exact list of package versions in production.
 
 Thanks,
 
 --Amos
Why not just clone the system?
Put it on DVD, and make images of those disks available.
If you are installing on a system in a country with limited bandwidth, mail or
otherwise ship a DVD there.

That will be the easiest way. Or just make your own repo with only the
packages you want, and set new systems to only use that repo.

But if the systems touch the internet in any way, you will just be creating a
security nightmare for yourself. If your software is so finicky that an update
breaks it, you need to redesign the app. The Enterprise distros don't change
that much, and if you have a test system, you would always test the updates
there first, and then script the updates and any tweaks that need to be done
from a central server. You could update globally this way to any system with a
connection, and you could send a CD or DVD to those that don't.


-- 
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Linux backup help

2008-11-16 Thread Amos Shapira
2008/11/16 Ian Forde [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Actually, that's the problem that Red Hat Satellite Server can solve.
 You can approve packages for deployment.  Thus, when provisioning new
 servers, they get updates from the approved list.  And servers are
 grouped by class.  For the free version, one should investigate Project
 SpaceWalk.  http://www.redhat.com/spacewalk/

Thanks for the pointer. I've looked at it a few weeks ago back when
there was some news about it and it looked promising but I didn't have
time to learn it in depth. Will keep it in my stack of things to look
at.

Cheers,

--Amos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Linux backup help

2008-11-15 Thread Amos Shapira
2008/11/15 Warren Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

[ long rant in favor of keeping the entire yum cache instead of a list
of package versions deleted ]

 move around entire cache backups across continents.

 Continents??  What, now we're worried about protecting against total
 continental destruction?  Maybe you're thinking you'll need those backups to
 help reboot civilization on another continent?

 Sheesh, talk about overengineering...  I would have thought that sending
 backups to another time zone would be more than sufficient.

My production and test/staging servers are over 12,000 km (or 7700
miles) away from my office. I need to be able to move configurations
around between my office and two separate hosted sites. Also I have
around 10 different system configuration prototypes (roles) with
more expected to be added - so every such cache is multiplied by
that number. I pay for the traffic and we easily hit our traffic quota
during a busy month of tests and updates, not to mention the huge drag
on time to copy things around back and forth.

On top of that - the cache is not reliable - it would contain deleted
packages, packages installed manually individually on one system for
testing, packages which were replaced by newer ones etc. It can be
cleaned (accidentally or when it runs out of space) etc.

Your solution of it's cheap so waste it is not just wasteful but not
sustainable as our operation will grow (or possibly even at its
current size).

Thanks for the advise, but the more I think about this solution the
more I'm convinced it's not going to help me.

I'll try to try to find or build something based on rpm -qa and yum.

Cheers,

--Amos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Linux backup help

2008-11-15 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg



Amos Shapira wrote:

I'll try to try to find or build something based on rpm -qa and yum.


no reason to use yum: it's for resolving dependencies, but in your case 
they would already be resolved.

Instead you could more simply and reliably wget the files and rpm -U them.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Linux backup help

2008-11-15 Thread Amos Shapira
2008/11/16 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


 Amos Shapira wrote:

 I'll try to try to find or build something based on rpm -qa and yum.

 no reason to use yum: it's for resolving dependencies, but in your case they
 would already be resolved.
 Instead you could more simply and reliably wget the files and rpm -U them.

Right, except that this might require to re-implement yum's ability to
find and download the right package from the right repository. Not
sure what's the advantage of wget+rpm over a simple yum install
then.

In the meantime, on another list I got the following recipe:

A. Installing the missing packages.
(On the source machine:)
$ rpm -qa --queryformat=%{NAME}-%{ARCH}\n | sort  package_list.txt
(On the target machine:)
$ yum install -y $(cay package_list.txt)

B. Remove extra packages:
(On the target machine:)
$ rpm -qa --queryformat=%{NAME}-%{ARCH}\n | sort  package_list_new.txt
$ yum remove $(diff package_list_new.txt package_list.txt | grep  |
cut -d -f2)

The provider of the above says it works for him on Fedora, CentOS and
RHEL, so it sounds like it's been tested for a while.

I'll test it further before actually using it.

Cheers,

--Amos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Linux backup help

2008-11-15 Thread Ian Forde
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 15:08 -0700, Warren Young wrote:
 Amos Shapira wrote:
  Is there a way to freeze a list of installed packages and exact
  versions, then tell yum (or any other tool/script) to install exactly
  these verions either on the same or another systme?
 
 There isn't a need for an explicit feature.  Just update one server, 
 test it, then copy all of /var/cache/yum/updates/packages to the other 
 machines.  You can then say rpm -Fvh *.rpm in that directory to bring 
 that machine up to the same level as the other one.

Actually, that's the problem that Red Hat Satellite Server can solve.
You can approve packages for deployment.  Thus, when provisioning new
servers, they get updates from the approved list.  And servers are
grouped by class.  For the free version, one should investigate Project
SpaceWalk.  http://www.redhat.com/spacewalk/

-I

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Linux backup help

2008-11-14 Thread Amos Shapira
Is there a way to freeze a list of installed packages and exact
versions, then tell yum (or any other tool/script) to install exactly
these verions either on the same or another systme?

I'm asking from perspective of being able to update and test in my
test or staging environment then when tests pass I want to replicate
the exact list of package versions in production.

Thanks,

--Amos

On 11/12/08, Marc Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Kevin Kempter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 writes:

 Hi All;

 I'm awaiting a new linux laptop that will be my primary work machine. I
 want
 to implement a strategy that allows me as easily as possible to revert
 back
 to a former state. My primary concern is a scenario where I apply system
 updates and it breaks something that for me is critical.

 I wonder if a simple rsync script would work. If so, here's what I'm
 thinking:

 1) updates are available so I execute the rsync script which pulls any
 updated
 files from my laptop to a backup server/drive

 2) apply updates

 3) if something breaks (even if I can no longer login) I boot the laptop,
 run
 the rsync script in the opposite direction (push files from the backup
 drive
 to the laptop)

 I assume that if I were to execute step 3 above that my system would be in
 the
 exact state that it was before I ran the updates. Is this a correct
 assumption ?  Are there better approaches ?


 Thanks in advance..

 Look at rsnapshot, which is rsync based and enables hourly, daily,
 weekly and monthly rotating backups.

 This is what I used on my laptop, to an external USB HD. It provides an
 OSX Time Machine like schema, albeit without the fancy GUI.

 http://rsnapshot.org/

 HTH,

 Marc Schwartz

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


-- 
Sent from Google Mail for mobile | mobile.google.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Linux backup help

2008-11-14 Thread Warren Young

Amos Shapira wrote:

Is there a way to freeze a list of installed packages and exact
versions, then tell yum (or any other tool/script) to install exactly
these verions either on the same or another systme?


There isn't a need for an explicit feature.  Just update one server, 
test it, then copy all of /var/cache/yum/updates/packages to the other 
machines.  You can then say rpm -Fvh *.rpm in that directory to bring 
that machine up to the same level as the other one.


We don't do it exactly that way.  We copy the current package cache to 
new machines after installation to speed a regular yum update, as it 
needs only enough bandwidth to download what's changed since updating 
the package cache clone.  Because of CentOS/RHEL's policy of not 
upgrading versions, only patching the released version, we haven't had 
any serious problems by allowing production systems to track the current 
yum repositories.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Linux backup help

2008-11-14 Thread Amos Shapira
What about disaster recovery?
Assuming I take the approach you suggest and have to restore the cache
(with the tested versions) after it's lost in a disaster, is there a
way to do that (short of backing it up)? I'd  rather be able to keep a
list of package versions instead of having to move around entire cache
backups across continents.

Thanks,

--Amos

On 11/15/08, Warren Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Amos Shapira wrote:
 Is there a way to freeze a list of installed packages and exact
 versions, then tell yum (or any other tool/script) to install exactly
 these verions either on the same or another systme?

 There isn't a need for an explicit feature.  Just update one server,
 test it, then copy all of /var/cache/yum/updates/packages to the other
 machines.  You can then say rpm -Fvh *.rpm in that directory to bring
 that machine up to the same level as the other one.

 We don't do it exactly that way.  We copy the current package cache to
 new machines after installation to speed a regular yum update, as it
 needs only enough bandwidth to download what's changed since updating
 the package cache clone.  Because of CentOS/RHEL's policy of not
 upgrading versions, only patching the released version, we haven't had
 any serious problems by allowing production systems to track the current
 yum repositories.
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


-- 
Sent from Google Mail for mobile | mobile.google.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Linux backup help

2008-11-14 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg


Amos Shapira wrote:

What about disaster recovery?
Assuming I take the approach you suggest and have to restore the cache
(with the tested versions) after it's lost in a disaster, is there a
way to do that (short of backing it up)? I'd  rather be able to keep a
list of package versions instead of having to move around entire cache
backups across continents.


something like this?
rpm -qa  installed_packages

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Linux backup help

2008-11-14 Thread Amos Shapira
Looks good.

And is there a tool which can read this output and fetch the right
packages from the right repositories, or do I have to write my own?

Would a script which massages this into an input for | xargs yum
install be the way to go?

Thanks!

--Amos

On 11/15/08, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Amos Shapira wrote:
 What about disaster recovery?
 Assuming I take the approach you suggest and have to restore the cache
 (with the tested versions) after it's lost in a disaster, is there a
 way to do that (short of backing it up)? I'd  rather be able to keep a
 list of package versions instead of having to move around entire cache
 backups across continents.

 something like this?
 rpm -qa  installed_packages

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


-- 
Sent from Google Mail for mobile | mobile.google.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Linux backup help

2008-11-14 Thread Warren Young

Amos Shapira wrote:

Assuming I take the approach you suggest and have to restore the cache
(with the tested versions) after it's lost in a disaster, is there a
way to do that (short of backing it up)? 


I don't see why this is a big deal.

First off, even way out at the end of a RHEL/CentOS release's lifetime, 
the full set of patched packages will be just a few gigs of data.  (It 
almost *has* to be smaller than a single-layer DVD...the patch set can't 
practically be bigger than the original OS it's patching.)  Today, a 
couple of gigs costs nearly nothing to store, and 3 years from now when 
the last CentOS 5 patches come out, storage and bandwidth costs will be 
1/4 what they are now.


Second, this scheme replicates the cache to multiple machines.  Most of 
the time, only a single machine will get killed at a time, so you can 
get the cache copy from one of its neighbors.  If you're worried about a 
disaster that can take out a whole building's worth of machines at once, 
surely the cost of a few gigs of professional off-site storage isn't out 
of the question?


I keep the most precious 4 GB of my home data backed up on Amazon S3. 
This costs me about 75 cents a month.  The solution I'm proposing would 
take maybe half that out at the end of its useful life, and more like 
1/10 that today.  Total cost over three years is maybe the cost of lunch 
for you and a few friends.  You'll spend more than that of your 
company's time writing the script to pull the data from a public 
repository, and on top of that it's a waste of someone else's bandwidth 
to treat them as your company's backup system.



move around entire cache backups across continents.


Continents??  What, now we're worried about protecting against total 
continental destruction?  Maybe you're thinking you'll need those 
backups to help reboot civilization on another continent?


Sheesh, talk about overengineering...  I would have thought that sending 
backups to another time zone would be more than sufficient.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Re: Linux backup help

2008-11-11 Thread Marc Schwartz
Kevin Kempter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:

 Hi All;

 I'm awaiting a new linux laptop that will be my primary work machine. I want 
 to implement a strategy that allows me as easily as possible to revert back 
 to a former state. My primary concern is a scenario where I apply system 
 updates and it breaks something that for me is critical.   

 I wonder if a simple rsync script would work. If so, here's what I'm thinking:

 1) updates are available so I execute the rsync script which pulls any 
 updated 
 files from my laptop to a backup server/drive

 2) apply updates

 3) if something breaks (even if I can no longer login) I boot the laptop, run 
 the rsync script in the opposite direction (push files from the backup drive 
 to the laptop) 

 I assume that if I were to execute step 3 above that my system would be in 
 the 
 exact state that it was before I ran the updates. Is this a correct 
 assumption ?  Are there better approaches ?


 Thanks in advance..

Look at rsnapshot, which is rsync based and enables hourly, daily,
weekly and monthly rotating backups.

This is what I used on my laptop, to an external USB HD. It provides an
OSX Time Machine like schema, albeit without the fancy GUI.

http://rsnapshot.org/

HTH,

Marc Schwartz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos