Re: [CentOS] Segmentation fault
hi each test was fresh install now i've installed centos 4.8 (works fine) and upgraded do 5.3 (via cd/netinst), and the segfault appears again df -h gives me about 29G free on the / partition any other hints? fous 2009/9/18 Todd Denniston : > > Warning: WAG questions follow: > > was each of the 5.X tests done from install or upgrades from previous > installs? > [I have seen a library get munged on first install, and a reinstall would fix > it, but if the upgrade > used the same version of the lib, it would not fix it.] > > Just another guess, what processor do you have? > > How close to being full is the disk after the 5.X install? > > -- > Todd Denniston > Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane) > Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Segmentation fault
hi here is my hw config 00:00.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CMIC-WS Host Bridge (GC-LE chipset) (rev 13) 00:00.1 Host bridge: Broadcom CMIC-WS Host Bridge (GC-LE chipset) 00:00.2 Host bridge: Broadcom CMIC-LE 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27) 00:03.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557/8/9/0/1 Ethernet Pro 100 (rev 0d) 00:08.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M [Tornado] (rev 78) 00:0f.0 ISA bridge: Broadcom CSB5 South Bridge (rev 93) 00:0f.1 IDE interface: Broadcom CSB5 IDE Controller (rev 93) 00:0f.2 USB Controller: Broadcom OSB4/CSB5 OHCI USB Controller (rev 05) 00:0f.3 Host bridge: Broadcom CSB5 LPC bridge 00:11.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-X2 PCI-X I/O Bridge (rev 03) 00:11.2 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-X2 PCI-X I/O Bridge (rev 03) 01:04.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82544GC Gigabit Ethernet Controller (LOM) (rev 02) 02:08.0 PCI bridge: Adaptec (formerly DPT) PCI Bridge (rev 01) 02:08.1 I2O: Adaptec (formerly DPT) SmartRAID V Controller (rev 01) 02:09.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AIC-7899P U160/m (rev 01) 02:09.1 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AIC-7899P U160/m (rev 01) processor : 3 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 2 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz stepping: 7 cpu MHz : 2399.907 cache size : 512 KB physical id : 3 siblings: 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 1 apicid : 7 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 2 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid xtpr bogomips: 4798.76 about 4G ram 2009/9/18 James Bensley : > I am clutching at straws here but would that suggest there is a > hardware incompatibility issue, what is you physical set up? > > -- > > Pablo Picasso - "Computers are useless. They can only give you > answers." - http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/p/pablo_picasso.html > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Segmentation fault
fous velkej wrote, On 09/18/2009 09:44 AM: > hi > > i've recently installed centos 5.3 on the machine. > the installation went fine, but after that (on the first boot) it says > a lot of segmentation fault errors > > fe. > # yum > Segmentation fault > > i've tried centos 5.2 and 5.0 also, but none of them works. > but the centos 4.x works fine. > > could anyone tell me where the problem is? > thanx a lot > fous Warning: WAG questions follow: was each of the 5.X tests done from install or upgrades from previous installs? [I have seen a library get munged on first install, and a reinstall would fix it, but if the upgrade used the same version of the lib, it would not fix it.] Just another guess, what processor do you have? How close to being full is the disk after the 5.X install? -- Todd Denniston Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane) Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Segmentation fault
I am clutching at straws here but would that suggest there is a hardware incompatibility issue, what is you physical set up? -- Pablo Picasso - "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." - http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/p/pablo_picasso.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Segmentation fault
hi i've recently installed centos 5.3 on the machine. the installation went fine, but after that (on the first boot) it says a lot of segmentation fault errors fe. # yum Segmentation fault i've tried centos 5.2 and 5.0 also, but none of them works. but the centos 4.x works fine. could anyone tell me where the problem is? thanx a lot fous ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Segmentation fault using flash-plugin under CentOS 5.3 (SOLVED)
carlopmart wrote:
> carlopmart wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I have a very strange problem on my CentOS 5.3 laptop. I have
>> installed latest firefox version from updates repository (3.0.7) with
>> flash-plugin downloaded from adobe website. When i open firefox and i
>> need to access to some web site with flash content, firefox crash with
>> this message:
>>
>> /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.7/run-mozilla.sh: line 131: 9133 Segmentation
>> fault "$prog" ${1+"$@"}
>>
>> Problem appears with versions 3.0.5 and 3.0.6 too. On the other hand,
>> I have another laptop installed with RHEL 5.3 with firefox and
>> flash-plugin (but this flash-plugin is installed from redhat
>> repository - rhn) and this problem doesn't appears ...
>>
>> Where is the problem?? Maybe is it a bug with firefox under CentOS
>> only??
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
> Please any hits?? I have attached strace output using this command:
> "strace firefox http://www.nvidia.com";
>
> many thanks.
Ok I have found th solution to this problem. I need to install curl package
like
says in http://macromedia.mplug.org/.
Many thanks to all for your help.
>
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Segmentation fault using flash-plugin under CentOS 5.3
carlopmart wrote:
Hi all
I have a very strange problem on my CentOS 5.3 laptop. I have installed
latest firefox version from updates repository (3.0.7) with flash-plugin
downloaded from adobe website. When i open firefox and i need to access
to some web site with flash content, firefox crash with this message:
/usr/lib/firefox-3.0.7/run-mozilla.sh: line 131: 9133 Segmentation
fault "$prog" ${1+"$@"}
Problem appears with versions 3.0.5 and 3.0.6 too. On the other hand, I
have another laptop installed with RHEL 5.3 with firefox and
flash-plugin (but this flash-plugin is installed from redhat repository
- rhn) and this problem doesn't appears ...
Where is the problem?? Maybe is it a bug with firefox under CentOS only??
Thanks.
Please any hits?? I have attached strace output using this command: "strace
firefox http://www.nvidia.com";
many thanks.
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
execve("/usr/bin/firefox", ["firefox", "http://www.nvidia.com";], [/* 33 vars
*/]) = 0
brk(0) = 0x8732000
access("/etc/ld.so.preload", R_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=36237, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 36237, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xb7fc5000
close(3)= 0
open("/lib/libtermcap.so.2", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3,
"\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\320\352;\0004\0\0\0"..., 512)
= 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=13084, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0xb7fc4000
mmap2(0x3be000, 14568, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) =
0x3be000
mmap2(0x3c1000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x2) = 0x3c1000
close(3)= 0
open("/lib/libdl.so.2", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0P\372:\0004\0\0\0"...,
512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=16428, ...}) = 0
mmap2(0x3af000, 12408, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) =
0x3af000
mmap2(0x3b1000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x1) = 0x3b1000
close(3)= 0
open("/lib/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY)= 3
read(3,
"\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\320\357'\0004\0\0\0"..., 512)
= 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=1606808, ...}) = 0
mmap2(0x269000, 1324452, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0)
= 0x269000
mmap2(0x3a7000, 12288, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x13e) = 0x3a7000
mmap2(0x3aa000, 9636, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x3aa000
close(3)= 0
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0xb7fc3000
set_thread_area({entry_number:-1 -> 6, base_addr:0xb7fc36c0, limit:1048575,
seg_32bit:1, contents:0, read_exec_only:0, limit_in_pages:1, seg_not_present:0,
useable:1}) = 0
mprotect(0x3b1000, 4096, PROT_READ) = 0
mprotect(0x3a7000, 8192, PROT_READ) = 0
mprotect(0x265000, 4096, PROT_READ) = 0
munmap(0xb7fc5000, 36237) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, NULL, [], 8) = 0
open("/dev/tty", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_LARGEFILE) = 3
close(3)= 0
brk(0) = 0x8732000
brk(0x8753000) = 0x8753000
open("/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=56455296, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 2097152, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xb7dc3000
close(3)= 0
getuid32() = 1000
getgid32() = 10
geteuid32() = 1000
getegid32() = 10
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, NULL, [], 8) = 0
time(NULL) = 1239362175
open("/proc/meminfo", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0444, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0xb7fcd000
read(3, "MemTotal: 3098440 kB\nMemFre"..., 4096) = 771
close(3)= 0
munmap(0xb7fcd000, 4096)= 0
rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGQUIT, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGQUIT, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, NULL, [], 8) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGQUIT, {SIG_IGN, [], 0}, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, 8) = 0
uname({sys="Linux", node="silmaril.hpulabs.org", ...}) = 0
stat64("/home/carlos", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0700, st_size=4096, ...
Re: [CentOS] Segmentation fault using flash-plugin under CentOS 5.3
Rob Kampen wrote:
> carlopmart wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I have a very strange problem on my CentOS 5.3 laptop. I have
>> installed latest firefox version from updates repository (3.0.7) with
>> flash-plugin downloaded from adobe website. When i open firefox and i
>> need to access to some web site with flash content, firefox crash with
>> this message:
>>
>> /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.7/run-mozilla.sh: line 131: 9133 Segmentation
>> fault "$prog" ${1+"$@"}
>>
>> Problem appears with versions 3.0.5 and 3.0.6 too. On the other
>> hand, I have another laptop installed with RHEL 5.3 with firefox and
>> flash-plugin (but this flash-plugin is installed from redhat
>> repository - rhn) and this problem doesn't appears ...
>>
>> Where is the problem?? Maybe is it a bug with firefox under CentOS
>> only??
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
> I too have this problem on one of my centOS work stations - I have two
> almost identical work stations running 64 bit versions of the os, but 32
> bit firefox versions. One machine is quite happy with the new flash, the
> other does a seg fault on any page that has a flash animation. My fix
> has been to use version flash-plugin-9.0.124.0-release.i386 and this
> seems to work fine - go figure
> HTH
>
Thanks Rob, but most of web sites that i need to visit requires flash v. 10,
with verison 9 doesn't works ...
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Segmentation fault using flash-plugin under CentOS 5.3
carlopmart wrote:
Hi all
I have a very strange problem on my CentOS 5.3 laptop. I have installed latest
firefox version from updates repository (3.0.7) with flash-plugin downloaded
from adobe website. When i open firefox and i need to access to some web site
with flash content, firefox crash with this message:
/usr/lib/firefox-3.0.7/run-mozilla.sh: line 131: 9133 Segmentation fault
"$prog" ${1+"$@"}
Problem appears with versions 3.0.5 and 3.0.6 too. On the other hand, I have
another laptop installed with RHEL 5.3 with firefox and flash-plugin (but this
flash-plugin is installed from redhat repository - rhn) and this problem doesn't
appears ...
Where is the problem?? Maybe is it a bug with firefox under CentOS only??
Thanks.
I too have this problem on one of my centOS work stations - I have two
almost identical work stations running 64 bit versions of the os, but 32
bit firefox versions. One machine is quite happy with the new flash, the
other does a seg fault on any page that has a flash animation. My fix
has been to use version flash-plugin-9.0.124.0-release.i386 and this
seems to work fine - go figure
HTH
begin:vcard
fn:Rob Kampen
n:Kampen;Rob
email;internet:r...@kampensonline.net
tel;cell:407-341-3815
version:2.1
end:vcard
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Segmentation fault using flash-plugin under CentOS 5.3
Hi all
I have a very strange problem on my CentOS 5.3 laptop. I have installed
latest
firefox version from updates repository (3.0.7) with flash-plugin downloaded
from adobe website. When i open firefox and i need to access to some web site
with flash content, firefox crash with this message:
/usr/lib/firefox-3.0.7/run-mozilla.sh: line 131: 9133 Segmentation fault
"$prog" ${1+"$@"}
Problem appears with versions 3.0.5 and 3.0.6 too. On the other hand, I have
another laptop installed with RHEL 5.3 with firefox and flash-plugin (but this
flash-plugin is installed from redhat repository - rhn) and this problem
doesn't
appears ...
Where is the problem?? Maybe is it a bug with firefox under CentOS only??
Thanks.
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Segmentation fault YUM
Dear Daniel, I can right now define "Segmentation Fault" When a process is trying to exceed the memroy location of what allocated to it, we normally face in this case "segmentation fault". I face this problem, when i run rrd-analyzer.php(jffnms) manually. Regards, Umair Shakil ETD On 9/15/07, Daniel Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > today in yum update show this problem: > > Segmentation fault > > Any idea about this problem? > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Segmentation fault YUM
On 9/14/07, Daniel Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I rebooted yesterday. Have 2 kernels > I haven't messed with python recently Okay, you have to help us help you. I can't see your screen from here. Please provide information we'd consider useful. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Segmentation fault YUM
I rebooted yesterday. Have 2 kernels I haven't messed with python recently On 9/14/07, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/14/07, Daniel Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > today in yum update show this problem: > > > > Segmentation fault > > > > Any idea about this problem? > > Could you provide us a bit more detail please? > Which version of centos are you using, and on which architecture? > Do you have any additional repositories configured (rpmforge, ATrpms, etc) > Have you been messing with python recently? > How long has it been since you've rebooted (more than 2 kernel updates)? > etc. > > -- > During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a > revolutionary act. > George Orwell > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Segmentation fault YUM
On 9/14/07, Daniel Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Centos 5, i386 > I dont have additional repositories. > The system was installed recently.. And the rest of the information? Also, run yum in debug mode and see what it says. yum -d6 update -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Segmentation fault YUM
Centos 5, i386 I dont have additional repositories. The system was installed recently.. On 9/14/07, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/14/07, Daniel Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > today in yum update show this problem: > > > > Segmentation fault > > > > Any idea about this problem? > > Could you provide us a bit more detail please? > Which version of centos are you using, and on which architecture? > Do you have any additional repositories configured (rpmforge, ATrpms, etc) > Have you been messing with python recently? > How long has it been since you've rebooted (more than 2 kernel updates)? > etc. > > -- > During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a > revolutionary act. > George Orwell > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Segmentation fault YUM
On 9/14/07, Daniel Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > today in yum update show this problem: > > Segmentation fault > > Any idea about this problem? Could you provide us a bit more detail please? Which version of centos are you using, and on which architecture? Do you have any additional repositories configured (rpmforge, ATrpms, etc) Have you been messing with python recently? How long has it been since you've rebooted (more than 2 kernel updates)? etc. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Segmentation fault YUM
Hi, today in yum update show this problem: Segmentation fault Any idea about this problem? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
